What Changes Are Coming to the Transatlantic Digital Landscape? – German Marshall Fund
Posted By admin on May 6, 2022
In late March, political agreement was reached on the European Unions (EU) Digital Markets Act (DMA), closely followed a month later by the Digital Services Act (DSA). The implementation of the two acts over the coming months and years means that the EU is poised to reshape the digital landscape for millions, perhaps even beyond its borders. The final text of the DMA leaked on April 14 and is expected to pass a vote in early May, while the final details of the DSA are still forthcoming. Together, these bills promise greater openness and transparency for users, regulators, and researchers. Policymakers in the United States have identified similar challenges in the digital economy to those framed by the DSA and DMA and have proposed legislation that often parallels these EU initiatives. But US legislative action remains stymied by partisan debates and endless congressional hearings. While the transatlantic policy agenda is not exactly moving in lockstep, a window of opportunity may still be open with congressional focus on antitrust legislation. With US-EU cooperationincluding on digital policyheightened by the war in Ukraine and strengthened through cooperation in the Trade and Tech Council, these major recent developments in platform regulation will be watched closely, including by those outside the tech policy world.
The DMA is the EUs attempt to address the use of dominant market power by certain companies to stifle competition. European officials often use the expression breaking open, not breaking up to describe the DMAs approach to these digital behemothsallowing space for competing products and promoting interoperability to create a more open digital environment and not, for example, dividing Meta (formerly Facebook) into separate companies for Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram.
The DMA targets gatekeepers of core platform servicessearch engines, app stores, social networks, video-sharing platforms, communications apps, or cloud services. Gatekeepers are identified as companies with an EU market capitalization of at least 75 billion, or with 45 million monthly users (about 10 percent of the EU population). The list of gatekeepers skews heavilybut not uniquelytoward Silicon Valley companies. The DMA sets out rules for these gatekeepers: they will not be able to favor proprietary services over similar third-party ones or use data collected from third-party sellers to offer competing products, and would need to offer users choices for search engines, virtual assistants, or web browsers. Large platforms can no longer combine user data from across their services to target advertising without explicit user consent. New companies will be able to more easily enter a market if, for example, consumers and developers have access to app stores that do not charge a high developer fee. Transparency requirements also mean that companies who advertise on these platforms will have more access to their marketing and performance data.
The case of interoperabilitythe ability of different platforms and services to communicate with each otherhas been among the most debated aspects of the DMA and offers a good case study into ongoing disputes around some of these requirements. The DMA presents interoperability as a way to lessen gatekeepers control over communication services and allow consumer choice. Opponents claim that interoperability that is both user-friendly and privacy-protecting is technically impossible. Some argue that interoperability that breaks end-to-end encryption could in fact strengthen the gatekeeper, who could market encryption as an enticing reason to stay inside one system. Another argument claims that if users of a service with less privacy protection are allowed to communicate with users of a paid app offering greater privacy, the paid messaging service would lose its source of revenue if new, outside users essentially gain access for free. Beyond these debates, there are outstanding questions about what interoperability would look like in practice: When sending a message from encrypted Service A to non-encrypted Service B, would a pop-up warn you that your message is leaving an encrypted service? What level of transparency is needed for users to decide whether a potential weakening of privacy is a worthwhile trade-off? And would this be more difficult to scale in a US context, given that Americans have a much higher use of non-encrypted SMS rather than messaging apps like Signal or WhatsApp? Such open-ended questions will have to be worked out in the process of implementing these new rules in practice.
Beyond these debates, there are outstanding questions about what interoperability would look like in practice.
The DSA updates the 2000 e-Commerce Directive governing online platforms and marketplaces to harmonize the laws across EU member states and create one set of rules regarding illegal content, including how users notify platforms of illegal content and the subsequent actions that platforms must take. What is illegal offline is already illegal onlinethe DSA aims at ensuring this concept exists in practice, too. The e-Commerce Directive laid out the liability regime for platforms, under which they have no general obligation to monitor for illegal content but are governed by a notice-and-action mechanism, meaning that once informed about illegal content, they must act or face liability. This would not change with the DSA. In contrast to the broader protections afforded by the US First Amendment, European countries have stricter speech laws, including hate speech laws or those outlawing, for example, Holocaust denial. Partly due to these differences in speech rules across EU countries, there are some outstanding questions about over-enforcement and preemptive blocking of content resulting in a takedown of otherwise legal speech.
Obligations in the DSA apply across online intermediaries, but special importance and extra requirements are given to very large online platforms (VLOPs) of over 45 million monthly users. These VLOPs have new due diligence obligations under the DSA and must assess different systemic risks that could be caused or exacerbated by their products or design. The DSA applies this notion to three main risks in the context of VLOPs: 1) the spread of illegal content; 2) negative impact on fundamental rights such as free expression and privacy; and 3) deceptive practices. These must be followed by risk-mitigating measures, such as content moderation approaches (like warning labels) or codes of conduct, which can then be assessed by independent auditors. The DSA also sets out parameters and procedures for crisis protocols, including the display of information by member state authorities in the event of a public health emergency or natural disaster.
The DSA also requires different levels of transparency from platforms for the public, regulators, or vetted researchers. These requirements mean platforms would provide data and information about their content moderation decisions, advertising, and the way algorithmic amplification shapes what users see. Redress mechanisms also mean that users will be able to request information about why their content was removed. This more systematic approach seeks to move away from separate debates over individual pieces of content, and transparency around internal algorithmic decision-making will allow more targeted understanding of how these algorithms present and personalize content and the harms that may result. There are outstanding questions about these algorithmic transparency requirements, including ensuring privacy of user data, and US observers have raised questions about whether such transparency requirements around platforms algorithms would be constitutional under the US First Amendment (in which mandatory transparency would be seen as a form of compelled speech). Overall, however, the DSA marks a shift from a more self-regulatory approach to one with more binding rules. The self-regulatory Code of Practice on Disinformation, for example, will evolve into a co-regulatory instrument with the DSA.
As the DMA and DSA near the finish line, the question turns to one of enforcement. The DMA will be enforced by the EU Commission, with the potential for fines and penalties of up to 10 percent of global turnover or 20 percent for repeat offenders. DSA enforcement includes fines up to 6 percent of global turnover. VLOPs will be supervised by the EU Commission, with a proportional supervisory fee of up to 0.05 percent of global annual income. National regulators oversee smaller platforms, and new digital services coordinators will have oversight and investigatory powers. Questions remain, however, about the DSAs proposed European board for digital services and the future relationship between national-level digital services coordinators and other national regulators.
The level of specificity in the final draft and the resources afforded to enforcement, keeping in mind that gatekeeper firms will likely also challenge enforcement in court, should be considered when thinking about the DMAs future impact.
One issue hanging over centralized enforcement at the EU Commission level for the DMA is personnel: an 80-member enforcement team was proposed in its initial draft, a figure now largely seen as inadequate. The European Councils chief economist is reported to have said that the EU Commission will be shorthanded for the first few years with regards to implementing the DMAa consequence of budgetary constraints. Debates around enforcement or under-enforcement of the General Data Protection Regulation, where the data protection authorities in Luxembourg and Ireland lack the resources to pursue investigations, remain front of mind. In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) lacks similar enforcement capabilities, as the Build Back Better agenda, which would have allotted significant resources to the FTC, failed to move forward. The level of specificity in the final draft and the resources afforded to enforcement, keeping in mind that gatekeeper firms will likely also challenge enforcement in court, should be considered when thinking about the DMAs future impact.
In contrast to the EU, policymaking in the United States may seem like endless cycles of new bills that go nowhere and perpetual congressional hearings, with the November midterm elections dictating and narrowing the chances for passing major legislation. Nevertheless, one area of unexpected cooperation has been antitrust. Senator Amy Klobuchars focus on increasing competition has found a rare bedfellow with co-sponsor Senator Chuck Grassley and an apparently accommodating framework for Republican diatribes against so-called anti-conservative content moderation policies. In this context, two recent bills share a better chance than most of becoming law, and it is worth examining what approach they take to platform regulation and the changes they would enact.
The American Innovation and Choice Online Act passed out of committee in the Senate in January 2022, despite some reservations from California Democrats who, while voting for the bill, have shown reticence toward bills targeting home-state companies, a pattern similarly observed in the House. It applies to platforms over a US market capitalization of $550 billion or those with 50 million monthly active US users (or 100,000 monthly active business users) and would address conduct that disadvantages competitors, such as self-preferencing, in which a platform like Amazon or Google favors its own products and services. What would this look in practice? Platforms would be sanctioned if they restrict interoperability or access to data, block users from deinstalling pre-installed apps, boost their own products in search rankings, or condition platform access on the purchasing of other products. The law would be enforced by the FTC, who along with the Department of Justice and state attorneys general would be able to bring lawsuits.
The Open App Markets Act passed out of committee on an even stronger vote in February. It is slightly narrower in scope, targeting large app stores with over 50 million users like Apple and Google. The bills would loosen the restrictions on app developers, allowing the use of alternative payment systemsa significant blow to the commissions of app store ownersand access to the stores operating system. It would require parity in search results and prohibit the harvesting of data from third-party apps to build competitors. Users would be allowed to sideload appsthat is, download them from non-proprietary and alternative app storeswhich is currently unavailable on Apple devices.
As midterm elections approach, time is of the essence for the antitrust bills in Congress.
As in the EU, companies in the United States have predictably protested that these bills would undermine privacy and the integrity of the user experience. Valid critiques about the risks of sideloadingApple devices have less malware than Android devices, for example, which allow outside app downloadsor those raised by legal experts about potential blind spots in the laws can be hard to disentangle from lobbying talking points.
As midterm elections approach, time is of the essence for the antitrust bills in Congress. Despite the bipartisan support behind these bills, it is an open question to what extent these shared priorities might extend beyond November. There is strong opposition to the antitrust push among some Republicans, and the possibility that the anti-Big Tech agenda would shift from competition to a focus on the censoring of conservatives and debates around Section 230, creating lots of noise but leaving the basic business model untouched.
With the DMA and DSAalong with the GDPR and forthcoming Data Governance Act, Data Act, and AI Actthe EU is seeking to set the standard for digital legislation and take advantage of the so-called Brussels effect, in which companies often end up adopting EU standards worldwide. It is likely that decisions imposed on platforms in the EU would affect their operations globally, including in the United States. There is hope among US researchers that they will be able to piggyback on some of the transparency disclosures required by the DSA, regardless of whether similar requirements ever became law in the United States.
The coming months will see new debates and challenges arise regarding these pieces of legislation with the potential to change the online experience for hundreds of millions. The answer may not satisfy those eager to reshape digital marketplaces and peer under the hood of these powerful platforms, but only time will tell whether these transatlantic efforts will achieve their desired ends.
Read the rest here:
What Changes Are Coming to the Transatlantic Digital Landscape? - German Marshall Fund
- French PhD Doctorate in Holocaust Denial Revoked [Last Updated On: May 19th, 2011] [Originally Added On: May 19th, 2011]
- Holocaust denial - Chelmno nad Ner [Last Updated On: May 22nd, 2011] [Originally Added On: May 22nd, 2011]
- Anti Semitic Holocaust Denial with David Duke [Last Updated On: May 24th, 2011] [Originally Added On: May 24th, 2011]
- Academic Freedom and Holocaust Denial Newspeak.mov [Last Updated On: May 29th, 2011] [Originally Added On: May 29th, 2011]
- Islamofascist Holocaust Denial [Last Updated On: May 30th, 2011] [Originally Added On: May 30th, 2011]
- Iran President on Holocaust Denial [Last Updated On: May 30th, 2011] [Originally Added On: May 30th, 2011]
- Iran: Holocaust denial conference underway [Last Updated On: May 31st, 2011] [Originally Added On: May 31st, 2011]
- Confronting Holocaust Denial: A Strategy [Last Updated On: May 31st, 2011] [Originally Added On: May 31st, 2011]
- Deborah Lipstatic On Holocaust Denial [Last Updated On: May 31st, 2011] [Originally Added On: May 31st, 2011]
- Nick Griffin, Cook Report, 1997 [Last Updated On: June 1st, 2011] [Originally Added On: June 1st, 2011]
- Holocaust denial by Palestinian official, Abd Al-Rahman Abbad [Last Updated On: June 1st, 2011] [Originally Added On: June 1st, 2011]
- Frank Arthur Hooper Closing Arguments Against Brooklyn Jewish Man Leo Frank August 21, 1913 [Last Updated On: June 4th, 2011] [Originally Added On: June 4th, 2011]
- Armenian Holocaust DENIAL TACTICS #5-7: Invert truth, seek "debate," obfuscate. teachgenocide.ORG [Last Updated On: June 7th, 2011] [Originally Added On: June 7th, 2011]
- DMD and Holocaust Denial [Last Updated On: June 7th, 2011] [Originally Added On: June 7th, 2011]
- Max Blumenthal interviews Holocaust denier David Irving [Last Updated On: June 8th, 2011] [Originally Added On: June 8th, 2011]
- Holocaust Denial and Antisemitism from Hamas' leader [Last Updated On: June 14th, 2011] [Originally Added On: June 14th, 2011]
- Nazi Christmas, OJ and Holocaust Deniers Get Free Speech? [Last Updated On: June 15th, 2011] [Originally Added On: June 15th, 2011]
- Christopher Hitchens on Holocaust Denial, Religion and Free Speech 1/2 [Last Updated On: June 15th, 2011] [Originally Added On: June 15th, 2011]
- We're not gonna take it! Stop Armenian Genocide and Holocaust Denial! [Last Updated On: June 24th, 2011] [Originally Added On: June 24th, 2011]
- Holocaust Denial Seminar Anti Semitic KKK Allies, David Duke [Last Updated On: June 25th, 2011] [Originally Added On: June 25th, 2011]
- Richard Dawkins Compares Creationism to Holocaust Denial [Last Updated On: July 3rd, 2011] [Originally Added On: July 3rd, 2011]
- Holocaust Denial is Anti-Semitism [Last Updated On: July 21st, 2011] [Originally Added On: July 21st, 2011]
- The Zionist War on Free Speech [Last Updated On: August 9th, 2011] [Originally Added On: August 9th, 2011]
- Holocaust Denial Laws ARE Anti-Free Speech [Last Updated On: August 15th, 2011] [Originally Added On: August 15th, 2011]
- This Day in Jewish Heritage: Lynching of B'nai B'rith President Leo Frank, August 17, 1915 [Last Updated On: August 17th, 2011] [Originally Added On: August 17th, 2011]
- This Day in Jewish Heritage: Lynching of B'nai B'rith President Leo Frank, August 17, 1915 [Last Updated On: August 17th, 2011] [Originally Added On: August 17th, 2011]
- Anti-Semitism August 17, 1915, the only lynching of a Jew in USA history. Leo M. Frank gets lynched by a Mob. [Last Updated On: August 17th, 2011] [Originally Added On: August 17th, 2011]
- This Day in Jewish History, The Conviction of Leo Frank and the Founding of the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith October 1913 [Last Updated On: August 26th, 2011] [Originally Added On: August 26th, 2011]
- This Day in Jewish History, The Conviction of Leo Frank and the Founding of the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith October 1913 [Last Updated On: August 26th, 2011] [Originally Added On: August 26th, 2011]
- Turkey Denial Of Holocaust [Last Updated On: August 31st, 2011] [Originally Added On: August 31st, 2011]
- Holocaust deniers are idiots. [Last Updated On: September 4th, 2011] [Originally Added On: September 4th, 2011]
- Flashpoint interview: Bradley R. Smith [Last Updated On: September 6th, 2011] [Originally Added On: September 6th, 2011]
- Holocaust Denial Rabbi Berel Wein [Last Updated On: September 10th, 2011] [Originally Added On: September 10th, 2011]
- Mirrored Holocaust Denial video by Speedy2554 [Last Updated On: September 18th, 2011] [Originally Added On: September 18th, 2011]
- Holocaust Denial Mirror-Original by Speedy2554 [Last Updated On: September 20th, 2011] [Originally Added On: September 20th, 2011]
- Holocaust 'Legend': From Lithuania with Denial [Last Updated On: September 28th, 2011] [Originally Added On: September 28th, 2011]
- Christopher Hitchens on Holocaust Denial, Religion and Free Speech 2/2 [Last Updated On: September 30th, 2011] [Originally Added On: September 30th, 2011]
- Magus Rants: Holocaust Denial [Last Updated On: October 7th, 2011] [Originally Added On: October 7th, 2011]
- Conspiracy Gatekeepers Holocaust deniers [Last Updated On: October 10th, 2011] [Originally Added On: October 10th, 2011]
- Fun with holocaust deniers, part 2 [Last Updated On: October 12th, 2011] [Originally Added On: October 12th, 2011]
- Holocaust Denial As Academic Orthodoxy (1 of 14) - Video [Last Updated On: October 18th, 2011] [Originally Added On: October 18th, 2011]
- Holocaust Denial - Video [Last Updated On: October 19th, 2011] [Originally Added On: October 19th, 2011]
- The 'Holocaust Denial' Debate. - Video [Last Updated On: October 21st, 2011] [Originally Added On: October 21st, 2011]
- Belgium: Politician Roeland Raes sentenced for alleged 'holocaust denial' - Video [Last Updated On: October 23rd, 2011] [Originally Added On: October 23rd, 2011]
- Holocaust Denial Discussed on Iranian TV There Were No Gas Chambers; You Cannot Squeeze 2000 Jews into 100 Square Meters - Video [Last Updated On: October 24th, 2011] [Originally Added On: October 24th, 2011]
- "Occupy Melbourne" Openly Admits its Anti-Jewish Agenda - Video [Last Updated On: October 28th, 2011] [Originally Added On: October 28th, 2011]
- Holocaust denier confronts death camp survivor - Excerpt from DENIAL - Video [Last Updated On: October 31st, 2011] [Originally Added On: October 31st, 2011]
- Mark Weber: Holocaust Denial - Apr 7, 2009 - Video [Last Updated On: November 4th, 2011] [Originally Added On: November 4th, 2011]
- Holocaust deniers are idiots - Video [Last Updated On: November 9th, 2011] [Originally Added On: November 9th, 2011]
- Denial Fiend - Horror Holocaust preview - Video [Last Updated On: November 24th, 2011] [Originally Added On: November 24th, 2011]
- What do Holocaust Deniers believe? - Video [Last Updated On: November 30th, 2011] [Originally Added On: November 30th, 2011]
- Briefing on Confronting Anti-Semitism and Holocaust Denial - Video [Last Updated On: December 1st, 2011] [Originally Added On: December 1st, 2011]
- German DJ fired over Holocaust denial - Video [Last Updated On: December 29th, 2011] [Originally Added On: December 29th, 2011]
- Farrakhan " These Satanic Jews " Holocaust denial - Zionist smashing - Video [Last Updated On: January 3rd, 2012] [Originally Added On: January 3rd, 2012]
- Richard A. Widmann - Holocaust Denial and Anti-Semitism - Video [Last Updated On: January 13th, 2012] [Originally Added On: January 13th, 2012]
- Bald Neo-Nazi Ben White Dominated by JDL UK in Amnesty International event - Video [Last Updated On: January 26th, 2012] [Originally Added On: January 26th, 2012]
- Obama pledges to combat denial on Holocaust commemoration day [Last Updated On: January 27th, 2012] [Originally Added On: January 27th, 2012]
- World observes Holocaust Remembrance Day: Poland, Russia, Argentina, UN, [Last Updated On: February 8th, 2012] [Originally Added On: February 8th, 2012]
- Standing for Truth- 175 Years of Emory - Video [Last Updated On: February 12th, 2012] [Originally Added On: February 12th, 2012]
- Joni's Holocaust Denial part 1 of 2: King David Hotel Bombing [Last Updated On: June 21st, 2012] [Originally Added On: June 21st, 2012]
- C2CAM Lizard Man, Reptoids, and Mutilations Discussed Main Show Only - Video [Last Updated On: October 24th, 2012] [Originally Added On: October 24th, 2012]
- C2CAM Angels or Shapeshifting Aliens Discussed Main Show Only - Video [Last Updated On: October 24th, 2012] [Originally Added On: October 24th, 2012]
- C2CAM Bloodline Conspiracy Discussed Main Show Only - Video [Last Updated On: October 24th, 2012] [Originally Added On: October 24th, 2012]
- C2CAM The Annunaki and Humankind Discussed Main Show Only - Video [Last Updated On: October 24th, 2012] [Originally Added On: October 24th, 2012]
- C2CAM Flying Saucers Special with Stanton Friedman Discussed Main Show Only - Video [Last Updated On: October 24th, 2012] [Originally Added On: October 24th, 2012]
- C2CAM Planet X and Sumerian Tales Discussed Main Show Only - Video [Last Updated On: October 24th, 2012] [Originally Added On: October 24th, 2012]
- C2CAM Multiverse and Parallel Worlds Discussed Main Show Only - Video [Last Updated On: October 24th, 2012] [Originally Added On: October 24th, 2012]
- C2CAM Ghosts and the Spirit World Discussed Main Show Only - Video [Last Updated On: October 24th, 2012] [Originally Added On: October 24th, 2012]
- C2CAM Solomon, Knights Templar and White Gold Discussed Main Show Only - Video [Last Updated On: October 24th, 2012] [Originally Added On: October 24th, 2012]
- C2CAM Star Visitors Discussed Main Show Only - Video [Last Updated On: October 24th, 2012] [Originally Added On: October 24th, 2012]
- C2CAM Loch Ness Monster and Bigfoot Discussed Main Show Only - Video [Last Updated On: October 24th, 2012] [Originally Added On: October 24th, 2012]
- C2CAM Bermuda Triangle and Coral Castle Discussed Main Show Only - Video [Last Updated On: October 24th, 2012] [Originally Added On: October 24th, 2012]
- C2CAM Jim Morrison and The Doors Discussed Main Show Only - Video [Last Updated On: October 24th, 2012] [Originally Added On: October 24th, 2012]
- C2CAM The Lost Ark of the Covenant Discussed Main Show Only - Video [Last Updated On: October 24th, 2012] [Originally Added On: October 24th, 2012]
- Pope Calls Holocaust Denial Intolerable And Unacceptable - Video [Last Updated On: November 5th, 2012] [Originally Added On: November 5th, 2012]
- Spain anti-Semitism new legislation - Video [Last Updated On: November 11th, 2012] [Originally Added On: November 11th, 2012]
- European Jewish Union meets Marine Le Pen - Video [Last Updated On: November 13th, 2012] [Originally Added On: November 13th, 2012]
- Holocaust Denial Awarness - Video [Last Updated On: January 19th, 2013] [Originally Added On: January 19th, 2013]
- Islamic Jew-hatred in the Middle Eastern Media, Part 4: Holocaust Denial - Video [Last Updated On: February 8th, 2013] [Originally Added On: February 8th, 2013]
- From the Ashes of History Holocaust Denial in the 21st century part 2 - Video [Last Updated On: February 11th, 2013] [Originally Added On: February 11th, 2013]
Comments