Jewish American Heritage Month

Posted By admin on April 11, 2022

This is the fifth part of my multi-part story of how, as a non-believer, I spent years in my teens and twenties looking at all the evidence for and against Christianity as fairly as I could, eventually concluding it wasnt true. The introduction is here, and Ill link all the parts back there as I write them.

At this point in the story, I was still in sixth form (the last two years of school).

The Messiah

One thing that did strike me as notable about Christianity was that it hadnt, in general, convinced the Jews. Specifically, the Jewish people had rejected the claim that Jesus was the Messiah. Which struck me as an important point; I knew that Judaism regarded the Messiah as vitally important and believing Jews were really looking forward to him turning up, so it sounded as though theyd have been thrilled had they actually thought hed done so. Which meant that they must have had good reason to believe that Jesus wasnt the one they were waiting for. I concluded it would be worth finding out what that reason was.

Of course, the traditional Christian explanation of this was that the Jews had failed to recognise their Messiah when they saw him as he didnt fit their incorrect expectations of what the Messiah would be. Yup; Christianitys explanation for this awkward point was that the Jews were wrong about a key part of their own religion. This was still more than two decades before the coining of words like mansplaining and whitesplaining, so I did not think of this as Gentilesplaining when mentally shaking my head at it; but I got the concept even if I didnt have a term for it. So, no, I wanted to hear what Judaism had to say about the Messiah and why they thought Jesus didnt fit the bill.

Since this was also several years before the Internet, this was not particularly easy. I spent a lot more time looking through the religious sections of all available libraries, and eventually found a book with the information I needed. Im afraid I cant at this stage remember either what the book was or precisely what information on the subject I got from that book as opposed to what Ive learned from numerous sources since, so some of this I might not have picked up until later; therefore, on this key point Im going to have to be a bit vague. However, the gist is that messiah (which is an Anglicised version of mashiach, the Hebrew word for anointed) is on one level a term that Judaism used for any king or priest, but that the Messiah was a title used for a particular king and descendant of King David, who was supposed to rule over Israel in a time when Israels enemies had been miraculously and permanently defeated and Israel herself was living in a time of peace and plenty.

That seemed pretty conclusive. Since Jesus clearly didnt fit the definition of the Messiah, it seemed entirely logical that the Jews had concluded that he was not, in fact, the Messiah. Sadly, I dont think I thought of the Monty Python quote at that point, so that was a good cue missed; but the message was still clear enough.

So where did this leave me?

Thinking about it now, Im really not sure why this wasnt the end of the argument for me. Christianity claimed that Jesus was the Messiah. He clearly wasnt the Messiah. Thats a pretty basic point on which to be wrong. I genuinely cant remember how I excused this to myself; I guess I was so determined to give Christianity a fair hearing that I gave them a free pass on this blatant inaccuracy.

Next up: More of the same sort of thing, but this time during my medical school years.

See the original post here:

My nonconversion story. Part 5: He's not the Messiah - Freethought Blogs

Category: Judaism
Tags: