Page 1,037«..1020..1,0361,0371,0381,039..1,0501,060..»

ADL seeks information on how New Jersey is handling rash of anti-Semitism – World Israel News

Posted By on July 1, 2020

According to ADLs most recent audit, there were a total of 345 anti-Semitic incidents in New Jersey the highest number ever recorded in the state.

By World Israel News Staff

Following the release of the Anti-Defamation Leagues 2019 Audit of Antisemitic Incidents in May, which found a73 percent spike in casesin New Jersey, the ADL has filed open records requests for information on how various towns are responding.

The towns in which requests were filed are Jackson, Toms River, Howell, and Brick.

According to ADLs most recent audit, there were a total of 345 anti-Semitic incidents in New Jersey in 2019 the highest number ever recorded in the state and the second-highest number recorded anywhere in the country last year.

In addition to the incidents of vandalism, assault and harassment documented in ADLs audit, there has been rising anti-Semitism online targeting the Orthodox and Haredi communities in Ocean County (the county that saw the highest number of anti-Semitic incidents anywhere in the state last year).

Prior to being removed from Facebook earlier this year, a Facebook group called Rise Up Ocean County hosted comments promoting violence against the Orthodox Jewish community, such as, We need to get rid of them like Hitler did, and, When they resist, bulldoze them.

More recently, in the wake of Covid-19, social media posts brought to ADLs attention have ranged from blaming the Orthodox Jewish community for the spread of the virus to referring to the community as an inbred cult that believes it is above the law.

There have also been threats of assault. In March, a New Jersey man was arrested for threatening to attack Orthodox Jews in Lakewood with a baseball bat.

Local elected officials and community leaders have also used blatantly anti-Semitic language when speaking about the Jewish community in relation to COVID-19, ADL reports.

The Ocean County fire marshal called Lakewoods Orthodox Jews trash, dirty ones, and filth, and wrote on social media that Lakewood should be turned into a hole in the ground.

Similarly, former Jackson Township Council president Barry Calogero suggested that people in Jackson were hiding behind their culture and religious beliefs to put others at risk, and calling for the National Guard to be deployed to Lakewood.

Last year, anti-Semitic incidents reached unprecedented levels in New Jersey. Now, in the wake of COVID-19, things only seem to be getting worse. We hope that the responses we receive to our OPRA filings will shed light on how our local elected officials are grappling with and responding to this scourge, and the policy decisions they are making as a result, said Etzion Neuer, Interim Regional Director of ADLs New York / New Jersey Office.

At a time when strong moral leadership is imperative, it is incumbent upon our elected officials to use their platforms to stomp out hatred and anti-Semitism, whenever and wherever it may arise, he said.

ADLanti-semitismNew Jersey

More here:
ADL seeks information on how New Jersey is handling rash of anti-Semitism - World Israel News

Fact check: Democratic Party did not found the KKK, did not start the Civil War – USA TODAY

Posted By on July 1, 2020

Historical Confederate monuments are being taken down and defaced from protests over the death of George Floyd. Storyful

As America marks a month of protests against systemic racism and many peopledraw comparisons between current events and thecivil rights movement, an oversimplified trope about the Democratic Partys racist past has been resurrectedonline.

Friendly reminder that if you support the Democrat Party, you support the party that founded the KKK and start a civil war to keep their slaves," claims animage of a tweetInstagram user @snowflake.tears shared on June on 19.

Many Instagram users read between the lines for the tweets implication about the modern Democratic and Republican parties. Some argued this past action discredited current liberal policies while others said it did not matter.

Everyone knows that Abraham Lincoln fought to free the slaves, but he also created the Republican Party, and was the leader of it to help fight to free the slaves, yet its said that most black people still vote for Democrats who fought to keep the slaves, user @shrukenshmuck commented.

Im a conservative but I find this argument pretty stupid because clearly thats not what they support anymore, values change overtime, user @james.dubee wrote.

Historians agree that although factions of the Democratic Party did majorly contribute to the Civil War's start and KKK's founding, it is inaccurate to say the party isresponsible for either.

Instagram user @snowflake.tears has not yet returned USA TODAYs request for comment.

Princeton University Edwards Professor of American History Tera Hunter told USA TODAY this trope is a fallback argument used to discredit current Democratic Party policies.

At the core of the effort to discredit the current Democratic Party is the refusal to accept the realignment of the party structure in the mid-20th century, Hunt said.

In September 2019,NPR host Shereen Marisol Maraji called the claim, one of the most well-worn clapbacks in modern American politics.

Comedian Trevor Noah tackled the misleading trope on an episode of "The Daily Show" in March 2016, after two CNN contributors debated the topic.

Every time I go onto Facebook I see these things: Did you know the Democrats are the real racist party and did you know the Republicans freed the slaves? Noah joked. A lot of people like to skip over the fact that when it comes to race relations, historically, Republicans and Democrats switched positions.

A similar meme attributing the claimto U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentBen Carson has been circulating social media since November 2016.

Who started the KKK? That was Democrats. Who was the party of slavery? Who was the part of Jim Crow and segregation? Who opposed the Civil Rights Movement? Who opposed voting rights? It was all the Democrats, the meme reads.

Other posts making more specificclaims about the Democratic Partystarting the Civil War or founding the KKK continue to circulate.

This trope was rated false by PolitiFact and theAssociated Press in October 2018.

Lincoln Memorial in April 2015 in Washington, DC.(Photo: Mandel Ngan/Getty Images)

Abolitionists founded the Republican Party and elected President Abraham Lincoln in response to escalating tensions around slavery after the Kansas-NebraskaBill of 1854threatened the balance of slave states to free states.

Southern states, primarily lead by Democrats, initiated secession proceedings and launched the Civil War. However, historians say the party is not to blame.

The short answer is that the Democratic Party did not start the Civil War, Hunter said. The war was initiated by Southern slaveholding states seceding from the United States.

Fact check: Congress did not designate Confederate veterans as U.S. veterans

Smithsonians National Museum of American HistoryCurator of Political and Military History, Jon Grinspan agreed with Hunter.

A splinter of a splinter of a Democratic Party really contributed to thesecession and the coming of the war, he told USA TODAY. It would be wrong to say the Democratic Party started the Civil War. It would be right to say some Democrats really contributed to the start of the Civil War.

Grinspan pointed to the many Democrats, nicknamed Copperheads, that fought for the Union as evidence that the Civil War was not Democrats versusRepublicans.

Fact check: Joe Biden's great-grandfather didn't own slaves, fight for Confederacy

The Ku Klux Klan was founded in 1866 by ex-Confederate soldiers Frank McCord, Richard Reed, John Lester, John Kennedy, J. Calvin Jones and James Crowe in Pulaski, Tennessee. The group was originally a social club but quickly became a violent white supremacist group.

Its first grand wizard was Nathan Bedford Forrest, an ex-Confederate general and prominent slave trader.

Fact check:Photo shows Biden with Byrd, who once had ties to KKK, but wasn't a grand wizard

Experts agree the KKK attracted many ex-Confederate soldiers and Southerners who opposed Reconstruction, most of whom were Democrats. Forrest even spoke at the 1868 Democratic National Convention.

The KKK is almost a paramilitary organization thats trying to benefit one party. It syncs up with the Democratic Party, which really was aracist party openly at the time, Grinspan said. But the KKK isnt the Democratic Party, and the Democratic Party isnt the KKK.

Although the KKK did serve the Democratic Partys interests, Grinspan stressed that not all Democrats supported the KKK.

Anti-Defamation Leagues Center on Extremism Senior Fellow Mark Pitcavage told the Associated Press that many KKK members were Democrats because the Whig Party had died off and Southerners disliked Republicans after the Civil War. Despite KKK members' primary political affiliation, Pitcavage said it is wrong to say the Democratic Party started the KKK.

Fact check: Yes, historians do teach that first Black members of Congress were Republicans

After Reconstruction and as the Jim Crow period set in during the 1870s, the Klan became obsolete.Through violence, intimidation and systematic oppression, the KKK had served its purpose to help whites retake Southern governments.

In 1915, Cornell William J. Simmons restarted the KKK. This second KKK was made up of Republicans and Democrats, although Democrats were more widely involved.

The idea that these things overlap in a Venn diagram, the way they did with the first Klan, just isnt as tight with the second Klan, Grinspan said.

According to Grinspan, the Republican Party was much more concerned with protecting African Americans and their voting rights from its founding through the early 20th century. In the mid-20th century, both parties' stances on racial equity began to switch.

President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act on July 2, 1964.(Photo: National Archives / Getty Images)

It starts with FDR and the New Deal, but the actions with Lyndon B. Johnson in the 1960s with the Voting Rights Act and civil rights legislation really kind of seals the deal, Grinspan said.

Fact check: Southern Dems held up 1964 Civil Rights Act, set filibuster record at 60 days

As the Democrats introduced policies to support voting rights, it became the favored party for most Black voters and has remained so since. With that realignment, many racist voters who opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 left the Democratic Party to become Republicans.

That was 150 years ago and the parties are totally different today, Grinspan said. Its like a dinosaur to a modern-day bird. So much evolution has happened. These really arent the same groups anymore.

Noah has mocked the political trope of highlighting the Democratic Partys racist past to question its current progressive policies.

That was true in like 1910, but then after World War II Democratic presidents like Truman and Johnson started supporting civil rights laws and that led to a mass exodus of racists from the Democratic Party, Noah mocked the claim in 2016. Just because something used to be something doesnt mean it still is. What matters more is what it is now.

Fact check: Yes, Kente cloths were historically worn by empire involved in West African slave trade

We rate the claim that the Democratic Party started the Civil War to preserve slavery and founded the KKK as FALSE because it is not supported by our research. Experts agreethat although factions of the Democratic Party were responsible for the South's secession and the rise of theKKK it is inaccurate to claim the party is responsible for either. The Democratic Party was undoubtedly the party of racism and white supremacy during and after the Civil War. However, it evolved throughout the late 20th century, and garnered the support of most Black voters.

Thank you for supporting our journalism. You can subscribe to our print edition, ad-free app or electronic newspaper replica here.

Our fact check work is supported in part by a grant from Facebook.

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/06/30/fact-check-democratic-party-did-not-found-kkk-start-civil-war/3253803001/

Read the original post:
Fact check: Democratic Party did not found the KKK, did not start the Civil War - USA TODAY

Ex-Hasid: Why my former community makes for such …

Posted By on July 1, 2020

From the critically acclaimed Israeli hit series "Shtisel" -- in which universal struggles between generations just happen to be set within a Haredi (umbrella term for ultra-Orthodox) community -- to Netflix's original documentary "One of Us" -- an important but incomplete portrait of people who flee the Hasidic community -- depictions of extremely religious Jews are becoming more mainstream.

And "Unorthodox," the latest series to offer insight into this community through the eyes of a young woman who flees a repressive marriage, provides four hours of voyeuristic thrills in a somewhat accurate, albeit one-dimensional portrait of Hasidim.

At 15, I first encountered the fascination of outsiders with the world I grew up in. Standing with a gaggle of women on a strip of grass, I watched as FBI agents arrested my neighbor down the street in the Hasidic enclave of Kiryas Joel, a modest suburb in New York. They carried the young father, who was eventually sentenced to prison, down the concrete stairs, his peyos (side curls) dangling in shame.

Reporters scrambled to get a shot of him and then turned the camera to us, the stunned neighbors. I might have felt like I was in a movie -- if I'd known what a movie was like. I had never seen one. As a sheltered Hasidic girl, I was as fascinated by the television crews that swept into town as they were with me.

But even after years away from it, I still wonder: Why does my former community make for such compelling cinema? Hasidim are an insular people. Built on a foundation of devotional religious practices and ancient customs, the community prefers its isolation. Founded in the 18th century by the Baal Shem Tov, the movement spread rapidly throughout Eastern Europe, splintering into larger and smaller sects led by local rabbis. After the Holocaust, Hasidim managed to rebuild from the enormous loss and have grown exponentially in the years since then.

To some outsiders, their elusiveness only serves to increase their allure. Enter writers and producers keen on lifting the curtain and granting viewers a peek into a community that, to some, may seem like a Margaret Atwood-style literary concoction.

I, however, am not a typical viewer of -- or player in -- dramas about Hasidim. Unlike in "Unorthodox" or "One of Us," my family's transition away from Hasidic life has left us with one foot firmly ensconced in the secular world and the other still with our Hasidic families, as we straddle that proverbial wall as best we can.

This may seem strange since the prevailing narrative of those who leave ultra-Orthodox communities would make viewers believe that we all "flee" with a few belongings, divorce our spouses and cut ties with our families who eventually disown us. But that's not what happened to us -- and to many others who lovingly glide in and out of these disparate worlds.

My husband and I left Kiryas Joel, our hometown, after a few too many run-ins with the "modesty committee" -- men tasked with maintaining the highest standards of modesty in my community. As a Hasidic woman of the Satmar sect, I was expected to shave my head, down to a stubble, the morning after my wedding -- and to maintain that length for the duration of my marriage.

But my husband and I were not your typical Satmar Hasids. We frequented the library and watched movies -- and, at some point, I stopped shaving my head. The committee learned of my transgression through the grapevine of yentas, and eventually we were issued an ultimatum: shave my head or expel my son from the only boys' school in town.

We moved out to a different, less restrictive ultra-Orthodox community. Although the first few years were unbearably difficult, laden with guilt and vast cultural gaps, we were adamant to hold on to tradition and family.

Perhaps because we still maintain a strong connection to that ultra-religious world, I don't carry many grievances toward Hasidim who still adhere to its demanding tenets. And now, when I watch films and shows depicting their lives, I find myself looking for the nuance that should be afforded to every community represented in cinema and television -- especially since, for so many viewers at home and on lockdown, this may be the only insight they get into the community I once called home.

In particular, I seek a compassionate rendering of customs and peculiarities -- and for the Hasidic characters to be treated sympathetically, dynamically and given agency where appropriate, a high bar "Shtisel" has set.

The show does not force a narrative about what it means to be Hasidic; rather, it shows Hasidim as simply human, with dreams and desires, hopes and heartbreak. From the overall ethos of the community down to the idiosyncrasies, "Shtisel" is a rousing master class on how to authentically portray ultra-Orthodox Jews.

The show opens in Akiva's dream. He is in a deli ordering a piece of potato kugel, a traditional baked dish, where he meets his recently deceased mother. The next morning, Akiva shares this dream with his father, Shulem (Doval'e Glickman) -- a bespectacled, salt-and-pepper bearded, stubborn yet soft middle-aged Hasidic man.

Over plates of Israeli chopped salad in a small Jerusalem apartment, we are introduced to this father-and-son duo who, if not for their specific attire and mannerisms, might have been well placed in any kitchen anywhere in the world.

This is everyday life for Akiva and his father, the principal of the all-boys school where Akiva teaches. The episodic through lines are less rooted in drama and more in the human story of community and love from the lens of the Shtisels: Its patriarch, Shulem; Akiva's sister Giti (Neta Riskin); Giti's ne'er-do-well, philandering husband; their five children, including Ruchami, played by "Unorthodox" star Shira Haas; and a number of other exceptional cast members.

Akiva's penchant for art renders him a black sheep. He has trouble finding a suitable match, which aggravates both his father and matchmakers. Date after date, Akiva rejects every girl offered to him only to fall for a twice-widowed artist many years his senior. (Worth noting here that dating is not the norm in most Hasidic sects.) Their courtship presents an internal dilemma for Shulem, who adores his son but fails to understand why he can't fall in line.

But "Shtisel" has no real villains or heroines. Its characters are sympathetic, whether Haredi or secular, toeing the line or coloring outside it.

In contrast, Netflix's 2017 original documentary feature, "One of Us" (which has been getting renewed life from the popularity of "Unorthodox") affords viewers little reprieve from the grimy underbelly of Hasidism. The film follows three ex-Hasidim -- Ari Hershkowitz, Luzer Twersky and Etty Ausch -- as they each navigate the trials and tribulations of lives upended.

Where "Shtisel" creates a Hasidic world defined by both its simplicity and its dynamism, and "One of Us" presents the perspective of those who choose to leave, "Unorthodox" falls somewhere uncomfortably in between.

Shot in Berlin and New York, "Unorthodox" focuses on short and waifish Esther Shapiro, played by the heartrending Haas, as she navigates her own journey to a self-determined life. Mesmerized by music and dreaming of a creative existence outside the boundaries of wife and mother, Esty chafes under the circumscribed life of a Satmar Hasid in Williamsburg, Brooklyn.

Saddled with a mother who has left her husband and their community for Berlin, and raised by her grandmother and a harsh aunt, Esty struggles to find her place. Still, when Esty is 18, a matchmaker succeeds in arranging a marriage with Yanky, played by a convincing Amit Rahav, sporting an envious set of side curls and a wide-eyed, penetrable gaze.

The two agree to marry after a short beshow, the meeting between a prospective bride and groom. Many modern viewers might be incredulous at this swift process, but it happened to me when I was 17. I met my husband for the first time in my childhood playroom, the door slightly ajar (people of opposite gender may not be in one room alone, unless they're married). Like Esty and Yanky, we sat across each other and made awkward chit-chat, while our parents waited in another room. Trays of cakes I had baked that day for a potential engagement party stood at the ready on the kitchen counter.

After the well-shot but somewhat imprecise wedding, in which women sport stringy wigs crying out for a sheitel macher's (wig stylist) comb, and men wear shtreimels (fur hats) that appear unrealistically stiff, Esty and Yanky endure months of painful attempts at consummating the marriage. The sexual scenes, gawkish and distressing, should come with a trigger warning. Though plausible, they seem farcical, lacking any tenderness.

True to stereotype, Esty's mother-in-law appears meddlesome: After Yanky confides their sexual ineptitude to her, his mother brings Esty a bottle of lubricant and tells her to treat him like a king. When Esty is finally broken -- literally and metaphorically -- and falls pregnant, she escapes to Berlin with a wad of Euros stuffed into the waist of her thick, beige stockings.

In Berlin, she sidles up to a group of music conservatory students, feeding off their creativity and pining for their success. Curiously, she assimilates rapidly and nearly painlessly, and her secular friends seem to embrace her and her social awkwardness. While forgivable on the surface (this is, after all, fiction), it's a gross misrepresentation of the agonizing liminal years most who leave, including myself, spend acculturating.

In a poignant if overplayed scene, Esty joins the group at a lake, removing her wig and dunking her shaved head to a dramatic score, evoking ritual bathing and tired tropes about water and rebirth.

But perhaps the single triumphant accomplishment of a plot that leaves something to be desired arrives in a bittersweet moment when we wish for Yanky and Esty to find peace -- whether they separate or stay married, remain religious or abandon their Hasidic lives.

In a hotel in Berlin, Yanky, as a show of his commitment to Esty, chops off his peyos to prove that he, too, could change. Esty, in a wrenching moment, tells him it's too late -- she has moved on. I was left empathizing with Yanky and hoping he found his way after Esty's rejection -- and empathy for a lost and loving Hasid is a feat many showrunners in this subgenre have largely failed to achieve.

While I certainly do not wish to discourage the portrayal of Hasidim in cinema -- and I do not posit that writers of fiction and drama need to adhere to strict accuracy -- I am nevertheless hopeful that the growing interest in my former community will give birth to more shows that present my sisters, aunts, uncles, former neighbors and friends, as people indistinct of others in their humanness.

In the penultimate scene of "Unorthodox," Esty's conservatory audition with a stirring rendition traditionally sung as the bride is led to the chuppah becomes a resounding validation for all Hasidic women straining under the burden of predetermined monotony. And yet, for every woman wrestling with what feel like chains, there are a hundred others who, whether because of contentment, innocence, or lack of agency, would never toss their lot in a lake in Berlin.

Read the original here:

Ex-Hasid: Why my former community makes for such ...

A Glimpse Inside the Hidden World of Hasidic Women – The …

Posted By on July 1, 2020

Sharon Pulwer was lost in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, shortly after moving here from Israel to study photography, when she came across the black hats and modest clothes of religious Jews in New York City. A secular Jew, she was momentarily taken aback. I was very surprised that there was this very vivid part of Jewish life here that I was not aware about.

Ms. Pulwer, now 24, had stumbled upon members of Chabad-Lubavitch, Orthodox Jews who follow the teachings of Menachem M. Schneerson, the groups charismatic rabbi, who died in 1994. As she learned more, Ms. Pulwer became intrigued by the communitys adherence to biblical precepts that strictly delimit the roles of men and women. For a man, the highest calling is a life of scholarly study of religious text; for a woman, it is devotion to the faith, the family and the home.

I am a Jewish woman myself, and I had the same questions about femininity and Judaism, and a womans place in a Jewish world, Ms. Pulwer said. Eager to learn, she approached a group outside 770 Eastern Parkway, unaware it was the world headquarters of the movement, and was surprised to find herself welcomed in as an observer.

As Ms. Pulwer and her camera moved deeper into the world of Orthodox women, she found a richness in the all-female spheres they inhabited. In Crown Heights, where about 20,000 Chabad-Lubavitch live, there was Dalia G. Shusterman, 45, the drummer in an all-women band (who may perform only for female audiences); Devorah Benjamin, a wedding planner who pays for poor couples weddings; and Neomi Schlifer, 34, a secular woman who chose Orthodoxy and runs womens support groups for the community.

The women, Ms. Pulwer said, take things that can be seen as gender roles and make it something special. They are making it their own, making it into something they are proud of.

There is a really interesting and beautiful tension between self-expression and following the rules, she said. And finding yourself within this religious world.

Sara Blau, 29, is a mother of four who works at Beth Rivkah, a local girls school, as a special-programs manager. She has written 19 childrens books. Navigating a strict interpretation of Judaism and the encroachment of the outside world can be challenging, particularly with the intrusion of social media and technology. Girls at her school use smartphones, but they are equipped with filters for the internet.

We use modern technology to spread Gods awareness, Ms. Blau told Ms. Pulwer in an interview. Were not looking to hide and be sheltered. Were looking to take what we have and go out and inspire the world.

And when you have a mission, you can do that, she continued. When youre passionate, you can do that.

When she was 21, Anat Hazan told Ms. Pulwer, she placed a wig over her mischievous light brown curls in accordance with the religious precept that a married womans hair should be only for her husband. While some women chose merely to cover their hair with a cloth or sheitel, or wig, the most zealous shave their heads beneath to ensure that their hair is never seen by others.

There is a certain energy to the hair, and after you get married it can hurt you instead of benefiting you, said Ms. Hazan, now 49. She has published a booklet, The Sheitel Advantage, which has since made her a sought-out authority on the subject.

It takes a lot of self-acceptance for a girl to cover her head with a wig, Ms. Hazan said. Its an act that has a very deep meaning beyond its physical expression and its not only for modesty reasons, since in many times the wig is more beautiful than a womans hair.

Devorah Benjamin was born in England and moved to Crown Heights when she was 19. She shared with Ms. Pulwer her personal mission of the last three decades: throwing weddings for poor or parentless couples via the organization she founded, Keren Simchas Chosson VKallah, or the Fund to Bring Joy to the Groom and Bride.

I hear from people who are not Orthodox or not Jewish that ask why we need an organization for weddings. Let them go to the courthouse and get married, said Ms. Benjamin, who pays for most of the weddings herself. Tradition is very important. It is tradition to have a wedding. It is tradition that people come and dance, she said. Its the foundation, a new family, a new generation coming.

To Ms. Benjamin, the highly circumscribed spheres separating the sexes are comfortable. I have my role, and they have their roles, and we need that in life, she said. It doesnt make me feel like Im less.

Read the original here:

A Glimpse Inside the Hidden World of Hasidic Women - The ...

Unorthodox’s Shira Haas: "I’ve been working towards this for eight years" – i-D

Posted By on July 1, 2020

Shira is wearing a swimsuit by DODO BAR OR.

The last couple of months were supposed to look a little different for Shira Haas. Following the breakout success of Unorthodox, its 25-year-old lead was due to fly around the globe to attend film festivals, award ceremonies and premieres, riding a wave of overwhelmingly positive reviews -- until the godforsaken coronavirus came along, that is. She suddenly found herself stuck at home in Tel Aviv, unable to see family, friends and colleagues. But, while for many of us in lockdown it felt like the walls were closing in, urging us to find ways to dispose of our partners and roommates, for Shira it meant that she finally had time to sit down and process what had happened since the show premiered on Netflix.

For those that have yet to see it: Unorthodox tells the story of Haas' character Esty Shapiro, who grows up in Brooklyns ultra-Orthodox Satmar community, one of the largest Hasidic Jewish movements in the world. Due to its strict traditions and the constant involvement of family members, Esty starts to feel suffocated in the insular community. After she marries Yanky, a young Hasidic man, marking the start of a domestic, family-oriented life, she decides to escape to start anew in Berlin. There, Esty, who is in fact curious, ambitious and a gifted singer, is able to shed some of the smothering expectations that come with being a young Hasidic wife. This happens quite literally, in fact: the scene in which she wades into Berlin's Lake Wannsee, takes off her sheitel (the traditional wig most Hasidic women wear after getting married), and submerges herself in the water can only be described a cathartic rite of passage, and of the most powerfully liberating moments in recent television.

Jumper Marine Serre AW20.

While Shira grew up in a secular and supportive family in a city close to Tel Aviv, she can relate to the transformative moment that her character undergoes. "At eight years old I was already very inquisitive," she says over the phone. "I was like a forty-year-old trapped in the body of a child, always asking these serious questions." And that never changed, she explains. She kept on pushing to find her inner voice, just as Esty does -- in Unorthodox, she ultimately auditions as a singer at a Berlin conservatoire. "When I started acting, it really opened these doors for me, and I was able to pursue my artistic dreams," Shira says.

In that light, Unorthodox could be seen as much as a coming-of-age story as it is a glimpse into a community hardly represented in popular culture. And that's where the strength of the series lies, in its portrayal of Etsys decision to leave her community as one thats completely understandable and relatable. After all, everybody has the right to go and find their own community, and not be predestined by the one into which they are born.

Sandals Balenciaga.

"Family to me is very important," Shira says. "I see mine every Friday at Shabbat dinners, and my grandmother is my number one person who I've missed terribly during this lockdown. But my acting family is also very special to me. When you're part of a set for a couple of intense months, you really start to form a community with your fellow actors, and develop these rituals that tie you together." Being able to move between all these different facets that make up your identity, that provide you with a sense of belonging, is ultimately what real freedom is -- something ultra-Orthodox young women like Esty unfortunately don't always get to do. Indeed, those who do decide to turn away from the community often end up being completely ostracised.

"I think a lot of people worldwide resonated with her character," Shira says. "The reactions I got from all corners in the world -- whether from secular people, or Jewish, from the elderly or the young, from Argentina or Germany -- they were all basically unequivocal: I could be Esty. But the fact that it touched so many people, and that it was such a universal story, really took me by surprise."

There have been some criticisms as well, particularly coming from members from the Hasidic community itself, deeming that the series portrays its members too harshly, as bitter and devoid of any empathy. This, however, seems to come with the territory of it being a dramatised series, Shira explains. Unorthodox never aims to be a documentary; it wants to tell the universal story of a girl finding her own feet through the prism of a particular community. "A series that will make an impact will most likely evoke emotion, and I welcome everybody's thoughts on it. But generally speaking the feedback has been really amazing," she adds.

"I understand that to many outsiders the Hasidic community might be this alien notion but I've always approached it with an open mind and curiosity. Not many people might know this but even within the ultra-Orthodox Jewish faith you have many different varieties." In Shtisel, for example, another series currently on Netflix, she portrays an Israeli girl from a Haredi family, another faction in Judaism known for its strict adherence to traditions, as opposed to modern values and practices. "To really understand all the rituals that are part of these communities, you must really do your research," Shira explains. "That's one of the reasons that we had a consultant on the Unorthodox set who was incredibly particular about details -- even the height of men's socks didn't go unnoticed, it had to be correct! Striving for accuracy was really important." While she doesn't bring it up herself, or boast about it, we cant leave out the fact that Shira learned to speak Yiddish for the part, with no prior knowledge of the language at all.

Dress Louis Vuitton Pre-fall 20.

It is tempting to see Esty as Shira's breakout role, but that would diminish the career that she had before the series. Take her part in The Zookeeper's Wife (2017), for example, where she stars alongside Jessica Chastain, or the role of young Fania in Natalie Portman's directorial-debut, A Tale of Love and Darkness (2015). "I see how people might perceive the Esty character as consolidating my career but I've been working towards it for eight years. Each time I take on a new film I am like 'This is the part and I need to give it my everything.' But yes, if you'd [told] me four years ago that I as an Israeli actress would be starring in a big international Netflix production I probably wouldn't believe it. Maybe in a couple of years I will look back at Esty and think: it really laid the foundation to my career."

Swimsuit DODO BAR OR.

Top Victoria Beckham Pre-fall 20. Bodysuit Y/Project.

Top Talia Collins. Skirt Marine Serre AW20. Head scarf Saint Laurent by Anthony Vaccarello. Socks DROMe.

Credits

Photography Yaniv Edry @ Today.MgmtStylist Michelle CameronHair Yaniv ZadaMakeup Michal RonenStyling assistance Shiri Shanhav and Lucie Tallandier

See the rest here:

Unorthodox's Shira Haas: "I've been working towards this for eight years" - i-D

‘The rabbi has no body’: Tape reveals how ally of convicted sex offender tried to whitewash his acts – Haaretz

Posted By on July 1, 2020

Moshe Dror Tzanani, a senior rabbi in Rabbi Eliezer Berlands Shuvu Banim Hasidic community, has been recorded trying to explain away the accusations of sexual assault for which Berland was imprisoned.

The recording, obtained by Haaretz, was made in the summer of 2016 just a few months before Berland was convicted in a plea deal of assault and indecent acts against women. He was sentenced to 18 months in prison, of which he served 10.

Berland is once again under arrest; the police suspect him of fraud, tax fraud, tax evasion, money laundering and exploiting his followers. Shuvu Banim is an extremist sect of the Bratslav Hasidim and Tzanani is considered Berlands most likely successor.

The recording concerns an incident that was not included in the evidence used to convict Berland. In the defense brief submitted in a civil lawsuit filed against him by the person who exposed the Berland affair, Tzanani said he never justified Berlands actions.

Two people are heard in the conversation: Tzanani and a man whose name has not yet been released. In the recording, the second man can be heard saying that a relative of his now in her 20s was sexually harassed when she met with Berland.

A few years ago, she met with the rabbi; it was in Betar. She went into [the room with him] and the rabbi touched her, the man said. He put his hands under her blouse and groped. He gave her a kiss on the mouth and told her that, with this, he was correcting the sin of slander. She said she felt that this wasnt anything impure, but it confused her a lot.

The young womans relative told Tzanani that she did not attribute great importance to the incident at the time, but Berland's arrest caused her feelings to resurface.

Rotem Tubul, Berlands lawyer, told Haaretz for this article: Such claims were made a few years ago and since then, Rabbi Berland has served a prison sentence, was released, and we know nothing about any claim in this matter.

In the recording, Tzanani quickly denied the claims against Berland. With us, even to look at a woman is forbidden, certainly not to touch in such a way, he said. "But Im telling you there are holy men who are entirely soul; its not a body at all. The rabbi has no connection to these things.

The statement that Berland has no body was repeated many times during the conversation. She needs to know: The rabbi is a complete ascetic, he has no body at all, Tzanani said. Sometimes he sees all sorts of things.

We've got more newsletters we think you'll find interesting.

Please try again later.

The email address you have provided is already registered.

Berland himself has made such claims over the years, including that he is God in the form of a man. Tzanani agrees; he has said the holy spirit rests in Berland, a man he says has immersed in a boiling ritual bath and suffered no harm, and just a year ago revived a dead person someone who was completely dead, and he resurrected him.

During the conversation, Tzanani said that it was preferable not to discuss the matter at all, and that if there was contact between Berland and a female follower, it was justified because it was not sexual.

It seems he saw some sort of thing and he needed to do this thing, but, God forbid, it was not anything, Tzanani said. Im telling you that the rabbi has nothing concerning the body.

When Tzanani's interlocutor once again noted that Berland told the young woman that he was touching her in order to correct the sin of slander, Tzanani responded: Yes, its known that the rabbi understands transfigurations; maybe he saw in her a transfiguration, something. You understand?

Tzanani was not immediately available for comment, but his statements in the recording could shed light on the role other people might have played in the Berland affair. In a civil suit filed in 2017, the plaintiffs said people close to Berland approved of, justified and explicitly whitewashed the defendants criminal acts.

At the time, Tzanani said he never ignored and did not approve of, validate or whitewash any crimes. Tzanani said he never justified a criminal act by Berland and never gave religious justification for any such act.

After Berland was released from prison early on medical grounds, he returned to lead his community, despite denunciations by ultra-Orthodox leaders. Two months ago, an ultra-Orthodox rabbinical court issued a harsh ruling concerning the sex crimes Berland was convicted of.

Explicit testimony and evidence has been received about forbidden and most serious acts, the court stated. Those who guard their souls must stay away from him.

The head of the rabbinical court, Rabbi Sariel Rosenberg, described in a letter that he had no doubt that Berland regularly hugged and kissed women and virgins, and put his hands under their clothes, and there were testimonies about it that were not refuted at all.

Regarding the corruption charges, the police suspect that Berland and a number of close associates collected money from people suffering from various diseases in return for promises that they would be healed. He also allegedly provided them with candy instead of medication.

The issue of healing also arose in the conversation between Tzanani and the young womans relative.

Tzanani described how someone once told him that Berland had met with his sick wife and he kissed her on the shoulder. Two days later, the disease passed. Do you understand? There are holy men; its not on our level . But you need to know that the holy man has no feeling at all. There is nothing.

Read more:

'The rabbi has no body': Tape reveals how ally of convicted sex offender tried to whitewash his acts - Haaretz

‘Defund the police’: A sick joke that’s coming far too close to reality – New York Post

Posted By on July 1, 2020

Sensible people laughed when they first heard calls to #DefundthePolice after the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis. No one should be laughing now.

Some of this citys leading politicians are moving toward implementing versions of this dangerous concept, and ordinary Gothamites will pay the price.

While there is no statistical evidence of an epidemic of unjustified killings of blacks by cops, the Floyd incident did raise questions about racialized police misconduct. But discrete, sensible policing reforms to address that problem are one thing; dismantling and defunding police departments, quite another. The latter idea is downright absurd.

Initially, even many liberals claimed the radicals #Defund and #Abolish sloganeering was just that: sloganeering, not intended literally. Democrats said it was all about reimagining police work and better training not actual cuts to departments.

But the momentum behind this crackpot idea has grown, as the radicals realized liberals werent serious about opposing them. The Democrats base buys the big lie that cops are a racist force that threatens the lives of every African American.

In New York, even before the #Defund movement got underway, crime rates were rising as a result of misguided bail reform enacted by the Legislature last year. The coronavirus pandemic compounded the difficulties of policing, what with Mayor Bill de Blasio emptying jails and deputizing the NYPD to shut down weddings and Hasidic funerals. Now add the violent protests and sheer anti-cop abuse tolerated no, encouraged by a hard-left political class.

But if you think all thats bad, imagine what it will be like after Hizzoner and City Council Speaker Corey Johnson implement their plan to cut $1 billion from the NYPDs $6 billion budget. It would slash the ranks of the uniformed force by 1,163 officers. Overtime cuts wont just reduce costs but also make it less likely that cops will be available when needed.

Looking to get ahead of the mob of protesters and pundits targeting his department, Police Commissioner Dermot Shea has already disbanded the 600-officer plainclothes anti-crime unit.

He blamed it for being involved in too many shooting cases. But since it was tasked with seeking out violent offenders, of course, such a unit would be involved in shootings. Shea was in effect offering a sacrifice to the BLM volcano, in the hopes that the rest of the force would be spared.

Predictably, that concession has had the opposite effect on the NYPDs critics: It only whetted their appetites for more defunding and, worse, lent legitimacy to their anti-police rhetoric.

No wonder police retirements are spiking. Among the ranks of officers throwing in the towel was Deputy Inspector Richard Brea, commander of the 46th Precinct in The Bronx. He departed after blaming both the lack of political support and the cancellation of the anti-crime unit for the forces problems.

Some of the arguments for cuts sound plausible. In addition to its routine wheelhouse of law enforcement, the NYPD has been asked to act as therapists to the mentally ill, provide school security and combat terrorism. In theory, some of that could be offloaded to other agencies. But when things go wrong, the cops will still be called to sort things out. New Yorks Finest are still the best bet to deal with many routine crises.

Nor is it wise to pretend that New York is no longer a terror target, absolving the NYPD of the obligation to prepare for such threats with vital intelligence collecting.

Despite the happy-clappy talk about reimagining policing, defunding means exactly what it sounds like. What is being contemplated is the gutting of the NYPD in order to appease the radical mobs liberal politicians fear. That means the officers New Yorkers rely on to help them when the chips are down wont be there when they are needed.

The result will be a New York City increasingly unlivable for ordinary citizens, especially poor people of color. Many are still under the impression that their elected officials care about keeping them, their loved ones and their property safe. Reality will soon awake them from their reverie.

Jonathan S. Tobin is editor in chief of JNS.org. Twitter at: @JonathanS_Tobin

Read more from the original source:

'Defund the police': A sick joke that's coming far too close to reality - New York Post

Zionism meaning: What is Zionism, what does it mean? – Express

Posted By on June 30, 2020

Zionism is a hotly debated topic in modern world politics and now the subject has been brought to the centre of British news after the Black Lives Matter UK movement were accused of using language associated with antisemitism following claims mainstream British politics is gagged of the right to critique Zionism. Express.co.uk has compiled a guide to explain what Zionism is and what it means.

Black Lives Matter UK (BLMUK) shared a post on Sunday which has incurred backlash from several Jewish organisation.

The tweet reads: As Isreal moves forward with the annexation of the West Bank, and mainstream British politics is gagged of the right to critique Zionism, and Israels settler colonial pursuits, we loudly and clearly stand beside our Palestinian comrades. Free Palestine.

The tweet was shared in the wake of Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer sacking shadow education minister Rebecca Long-Bailey after she retweeted a story which Sir Keir said contained an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory.

Jewish groups and some MPs welcomed Sir Keir's decision but Mrs Long-Bailey's allies on the party's left said it had been an overreaction.

READ MORE:Andrew Neil CATCHES out Labour frontbencher for 'repeatedly lying'

The BLMUK tweet sparked controversy on social media, prompting a number of responses.

Holocaust Education Trusts chief executive Karen Pollock said: I cant stop thinking about this.

Its irresponsible, disappointing and dangerous to post something like this to thousands of followers who sincerely want to fight racism.

Gagged? Gagged by whom? The insinuation is depressingly clear. You cant fight racism with racism.

The Jewish Leadership Council tweeted: We unequivocally support the fight against anti-black racism.

That people suffer abuse & prejudice because of the colour of their skin is abhorrent & we are actively involved in this fight as a community. But please do not fight racism with racism - we must be allies.

The Black Lives Matter UK group has not responded to requests for comment or confirmed the tweet, but did link the post to previous articles written about Zionism and Palestine.

The movement suggested more than 40 Jewish groups around the world had opposed cynical and false accusations of antisemitism that dangerously conflate anti-Jewish racism with opposition to Israels policies and system of occupation and apartheid.

The BLMUK tweets also link to an article published by The Independent in 2018 which drew parallels between the Palestinian cause and the struggle against anti-Black racism.

BLMUK also tweeted: We stand with Palestinians at this most urgent time, and against the accelerated attacks on their rights laid out above and in many other sources.

Ours is a united fight against colonialism in all its forms. Justice is indivisible.

DON'T MISSPiers Morgan CLASHES with Ken Livingstone in fiery debate on Hitler[INSIGHT]Jeremy Corbyn on brink as Labour MP set to quit over antisemitism[EXPLAINER]Jeremy Corbyn questions Israels RIGHT TO EXIST in SHOCK footage[VIDEO]

Zionism is Israels national ideology.

Zionists believe Judaism is a nationality as well as a religion and they believe Jews deserve their own state in their ancestral home, Israel.

The word Zion is a Hebrew term which refers to Jerusalem.

Throughout history Jews have considered certain areas in Israel as sacred, in a similar vein as Christians and Muslims.

The Jewish religious text, the Torah includes passages where ancient prophets were instructed by their God to return to this homeland.

Modern Zionism took root in the late 19th century and since that time the Zionist movement has successfully established a Jewish homeland in the nation of Israel.

But critics of Zionism have called the movement aggressive and discriminatory.

Arabs and Palestinians living in and around Israel have typically opposed Zionism, as well as many international Jews who disapprove of the movement because they do not believe a national homeland is essential to their religion.

Many disapprove of the movement and the privileges extended to Jews which are not available to those of other faith groups.

For instance, any Jew anywhere in the world can become an Israeli citizen, a right not extended to any other class of person.

Arabs often see Zionism as a species of colonialism and racism aimed at appropriating Palestinian land and systematically disenfranchising the Palestinians that remain.

The modern Zionist movement pits certain groups within the movement against one another.

The Zionist lefts typically wish a less-religious Government and support forgoing some Israeli-controlled land in exchange for peace with Arab nations.

Zionist rights defend their rights to land and prefer a government based strongly on Jewish religious traditions.

The Zionist right currently enjoys commanding positions in the Israeli government and popular opinion.

See the original post here:
Zionism meaning: What is Zionism, what does it mean? - Express

Young professionals launch new watchdog group, citing dissatisfaction with norms – Cleveland Jewish News

Posted By on June 30, 2020

Amid dissatisfaction with mainstream Jewish advocacy organizations, a new alliance of young Jewish American leaders was launched on Monday: HaShevet (Hebrew for The Tribe, which is also a nickname for the Jewish faith and people).

The organization seeks to represent a diversity of political opinions and professional backgrounds and come together, united in our dedication to promote moral clarity within the Jewish advocacy sector, strengthen and mobilize young Jewish professionals to publicly oppose all forms of anti-Semitism (including anti-Zionism), and take up the mantle of Jewish community leadership to safeguard thefuture of the Jewish people, said the organization in an announcement.

Its board of directors includes chairman Bryan Leib, former national director of Americans Against Antisemitism; vice chairman and president Nachman Mostofsky, executive director of Chovevei Zion; secretary Kayla Gubov, a political strategist; treasurer Joel Griffith, Heritage Foundation research fellow; Emma Enig, Republican Jewish Coalition national grassroots coordinator; Samantha Rose Mandeles, Legal Insurrection senior researcher and outreach director; Jennifer Taer, a writer and researcher for the website of investigative correspondent and conservative activist Sara Carter; Rabbi Yitzchok Tendler, co-founder of Young Jewish Conservatives; and Joseph Tipograph, a pro-Israel lawyer.

In its statement, HaShevet said it is driven by an unwavering imperative: the preservation, in safety and security, of the State of Israel and the Jewish Diaspora in North America. We are unabashed Zionists. Our Zionism is inspired by the courage and energy of the Jewish State and our unwavering belief in its legitimacy and enduring value to the world of nations.

The group went on to criticize efforts by anti-Zionists to separate Judaism and Zionism as disingenuous and ill-informed.

HaShevet said it was formed out of being dismayed at the diminishing effectiveness of mainstream Jewish advocacy organizations in North America, as strident and divisive fringe voices are taking advantage of a trend toward groupthink, hypocrisy, and virtue signaling within the mainstream establishment, resulting in Zionism is losing the culture war, as it increasingly becomes relegated to a narrow portion of the American political spectrum.

Therefore, continued HaShevet, political consensus around support of Israel is threatened by a false narrative that paints Israel as a rogue state at odds with the ideals of social justice and tikkun olam, which is Hebrew for repairing the world and making it a better place.

Rotating clockwise: Bryan Leib, Nachman Mostofsky, Joel Griffith and Kayla Gubov. Credit: HaShevet/Facebook.

HaShevet cited the rise in anti-Semitism in the United States, including on social media, college campuses and elsewhere that includes support for boycotting Israel.

Additionally, in its statement, HaShevet denounced alleged silence by much of the leadership of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations and their members regarding the twisted propaganda emanating from the U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights (with the support of supposedly Jewish anti-Israel groups such as If Not Now, Jewish Voices for Peace, and J Street) exemplifies the need to identify and promote the next generation of Jewish leaders who will bring back the good name of Zionism from those who have worked so hard to besmirch it.

JNS has reached out to the Conference of Presidents for a response to the alleged silence.

In its statement, HaShevet said it will begin to build a movement to counter these disturbing developments through education, communication and in working in coalition with other organizations of new generation leaders dedicated to the same cause.

Using social and traditional media, we will call out anti-Semitism in all forms wherever we find it. We will not shy away from condemning Jew-hatred on the political right or the political left, nor will we ignore Islamist anti-Semitism or any Jewish group that legitimizes it. We will move steadily toward developing a robust network and critical mass of young Jewish professionals who are steadfast in their Zionism and commitment to unity, not divisiveness.

The post Young professionals launch new watchdog group, citing dissatisfaction with norms appeared first on JNS.org.

See more here:
Young professionals launch new watchdog group, citing dissatisfaction with norms - Cleveland Jewish News

Remembering the handover of ‘one Palestine, complete’ Middle East Monitor – Middle East Monitor

Posted By on June 30, 2020

On this day in 1920, the first High Commissioner for Palestine, 1st ViscountSamuel,Herbert Samuel, was handed the administration of the country by the British government and signed a receipt acknowledging that he had received one Palestine, complete. It was still another three years before the Mandate for Palestine granted to Britain by the League of Nations came into effect.

What: Receipt of one Palestine, complete

Where: Palestine

When: 30 June 1920

The Liberal politician was the first nominally-practising Jew to serve as a cabinet minister and lead a major political party in Britain. Though not a member of the World Zionist Organisation himself, while Liberal Home Secretary in 1914 Samuel obtained the organisations latest publications. Not long after, he found himself campaigning for a Jewish national home in Palestine and co-operating closely, as he wrote in his memoirs, with Zionist leaders to further their cause.

With the outbreak of World War One, Samuels involvement with Zionism grew exponentially. In 1915, he proposed the idea of establishing a British protectorate over Palestine after the war and argued for a homeland in the region for the Jews, who had waited for over eighteen hundred years to return [sic] to Palestine, a land to which their connection, he said, was almost as ancient as history itself. Palestine at the time formed part of the Ottoman Empire, with a majority Muslim indigenous population, having been under Muslim rule for centuries.

READ: Israels incitement against the Palestinian curriculum

Let a Jewish centre be established in Palestine, Samuel urged in a cabinet memorandum that he drafted. Let it achieve, as it may well achieve, some measure of spiritual and intellectual greatness, and insensibly the character of the individual Jew, wherever he might be, would be raised. The sordid associations which have attached to the Jewish name would be, to some degree at least, sloughed off, and the value of the Jews as an element in the civilisation of the European peoples would be enhanced.

Samuels ideas increased the British governments pro-Zionist orientation and paved the way for the 1917 Balfour Declaration, in which the British Foreign Secretary declared the governments support for the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine.

The Ottomans entered World War One in November 1914 on the side of the Central Powers, and the Ottoman Empire was dissolved in 1921 after their defeat. A mandate for the administration of the territories of Palestine was assigned to Britain by the League of Nations and came into effect on 29 September 1923.

In a series of letters exchanged during the war known as the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence the British government agreed to recognise and honour Arab independence after the war if the Arabs rose up against the Ottoman Empire. After the war, however, Britain and France divided up and occupied former Ottoman territory as agreed under the 1916 Sykes-Picot Agreement and accepted the mandate system to govern Palestine. This was seen as a betrayal by the Arabs.

Viscount Samuel was appointed as the first High Commissioner for Palestine by British Prime Minister David Lloyd George. On 30 June 1920, he signed a receipt (complete with E&OE Errors and Omissions Excepted) addressed to him by the head of the British military administration in Palestine, Major General Sir Louis Bols, acknowledging that he had received one Palestine, complete. The receipt marked the handover of the land of Palestine from military to civilian administration.

In the eyes of Palestines indigenous population who were seeking their own independence and right of self-determination, Britain had handed over the territory to settler-colonial Zionists backed by Samuel, who governed the land until 1925. The people of Palestine had not been consulted about any of this.

According to Samuel in a speech that he delivered in Jerusalem in June 1921, the words of the Balfour Declaration, Mean that the Jews, a people who are scattered throughout the world, but whose hearts are always turned to Palestine, should be enabled to found here their home; and that some among them, within the limits which are fixed by the numbers and interests of the present population, should come to Palestine in order to help by their resources and efforts to develop the country to the advantage of all its inhabitants.

READ: We will never give up our birthright, insist Palestinian refugees

Two months later, in a report reviewing his first year as High Commissioner, Samuel said that Zionists sometimes forget or ignore the present inhabitants of Palestine many of whom hold, and hold strongly, very different views.

Britains policy of facilitating Jewish immigration to Palestine with the stated goal of establishing a Jewish national home, and the disregard for the indigenous population and their national aspirations, resulted in the Great Revolt of 1936, a nationalist uprising by the Palestinians against the British administration, and Jewish insurgency in Mandatory Palestine.

Britain decided to end its mandate in Palestine on 15 May 1948. David Ben-Gurion, the Executive Head of the World Zionist Organisation at the time and later the first Prime Minister of Israel, read the Declaration of Independence establishing the State of Israel one day before the mandate ended.

Zionist militias and terrorist gangs had already been committing atrocities against the people of Palestine and, indeed, the British authorities, leading to around 750,000 Palestinians being forced out of the nascent state. More than 400 Palestinian villages and towns were depopulated and destroyed; this figure now exceeds 530. This ethnic cleansing came to be known as the Palestinian Nakba, the Catastrophe. Despite its membership of the United Nations being conditional upon Israel allowing Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and claiming their property, the first government in Tel Aviv passed a series of laws banning them from doing so. In the three years from May 1948 to the end of 1951, some 700,000 Jews settled in the new state.

Israel continues to ignore the legitimate right of return as established by UN Resolution 194 in 1948 and reaffirmed every year since. It was also mentioned specifically as an inalienable right by UN Resolution 3236 in 1974.

Less than two decades after the Nakba, in 1967, Israel occupied the West Bank and the Gaza Strip during the Six Day War and started constructing illegal settlements across the occupied Palestinian territories. Contrary to the Zionist narrative, Israel actually started hostilities by bombing and destroying the Egyptian Air Force on the ground.

Today, Israel continues to exercise military control over Palestinians in the occupied territories, and there are now an estimated 6.5 million refugees and their descendants.

Marking 100 years since the handover of Palestine, the receipt signed by Herbert Samuel for one Palestine, complete has been included in a panel on the Palestinian History Tapestry, which tells the story of the indigenous people of Palestine through skilled, traditional Palestinian embroidery.

The real lesson of the story of one Palestine, complete, says Palestinian author and patron of the Tapestry project Dr Ghada Karmi, is the light it throws on Zionisms influence over the development of British policy, as early as 1920.

Such influence continues to this day, arguably more than ever.

READ: The Nakba in its 72ndyear

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.

View post:
Remembering the handover of 'one Palestine, complete' Middle East Monitor - Middle East Monitor


Page 1,037«..1020..1,0361,0371,0381,039..1,0501,060..»

matomo tracker