Page 1,108«..1020..1,1071,1081,1091,110..1,1201,130..»

Let us each find a way to remain committed to sustaining the Jewish people – Forward

Posted By on May 8, 2020

iStock

The conversation returned to the image of the ner tamid, a continuous flame that required meticulous care to ensure its everlasting presence.

In this new era of virtual reunions, my rabbinical school classmates recently started a Whatsapp group. Ten weeks ago, we started with personal news, some joyous and some sorrowful. Conversation was lighthearted, rabbis in the field enjoying some rare moments of social connection. Little did we know, little did all of us know, how quickly the conversation would turn.

As Covid-19 hit worldwide, the rabbi Whatsapp discussion drastically shifted. Whose Shabbat service is going online? How do we help mourners navigate Kaddish? What about funerals? School rabbis began to wonder about online learning, zoom tefillot, and virtual community building. Camp rabbis were stuck, left to posit whether summer memories would manifest at all. And as the weeks drag by, the questions grow with uncertainty, anxiety, and frustration. It is no longer whether the Jewish community, worldwide will suffer from the economic ramifications of this pandemic. Rather, the question becomes, how much?

At the end of every Jewish wedding ceremony, the couple breaks the infamous glass. Shattering into pieces too small to count, the rabbi often describes the ritual as a reminder of the destruction of the Temples in Jerusalem. We remember the diaspora of our people and decentralization of the Jewish faith for thousands of years. While I am wary of the comparison of this time to the destruction of the Beit HaMikdash, there is a stark reality painted before our eyes: if the Jewish community does not remain committed to Jewish professionals, Jewish schools, and Jewish institutions, Judaism as we know will destabilize. A weakening unlike anything we have ever seen. A clamoring for resources instead of a necessary move to step forward, brainstorming ways to grow stronger, to emerge together. Now is not the time to defame movements, criticize political views, or attack methods of worship. Now is the time to let our Jewish leaders know, while we may not physically gather, the Jewish community is present, strong, and more committed than ever before.

Nicole Guzik

The Talmud reminds us that after the destruction of the Temple, Jews were inspired to create a mikdash meat, a miniature sanctuary. Ezekiel reads, Yet I have been to them as a little sanctuary in the countries where they have come. The rabbis interpreted this phrase as the need to extend Gods presence through the building of synagogues and halls for study. Centralized locations where Jews would gather, meet, create families, banter, pour over Torah, nosh challah, celebrate, cry, learn and embrace. Shul, camp, school, Hillels, shtiebels, JCCs the current versions of the mikdash meat. The places in where adults and children explore their relationships with God, discover faith, and learn the value of Jewish community.

In a recent online class, I asked the question, Now that we must move away from the synagogue, for an undetermined amount of time, what exactly does one need to create a mikdash meat at home? Some suggested a room for books, others described the Shabbat dinner table as what brings holiness into their homes. But repeatedly, the conversation returned to the image of the ner tamid, a continuous flame that required meticulous care to ensure its everlasting presence.

Tehillim reminds us, Your word is a lamp to my feet, a light for my path. Meaning, it has always been the light of Torah that propels our community. For thousands of years, we are held together by a thread of divine light that urges us to bring blessing and goodness into this world. It is easy to take this light for granted. Whether it was the High Priest that was committed to the kindling of the ner tamid, the rabbis of the Talmud that were devoted to a resurgence of learning and interpretation, or Jewish leaders of the modern era that have built innovative centers for adults and children to wrestle with their faith, the light has never wavered. Quite the contrary: it is that very light that brightens our homes when so many of us feel consumed by this current plague of darkness.

But now, I call on you. Members of the Jewish community, I am speaking to each of you. The beacons of light upon which so many rely are threatening to vanish. Clergy are turning to each other, wondering about the future, hopeful that you too, will stand with us, ensuring the vibrancy of Judaism for millennia to come.

After the pandemic dissipates, will our Jewish institutions ever look the same? It is hard to know and difficult to predict. But as your Jewish leaders remain draped in uncertainty, it is time for every Jew to raise their hand and declare a personal commitment to the future of the Jewish people. It will only be with you in which the ner tamid remains lit, offering the kind of fire and hope we all need to survive these unprecedented times.

Imagine the fragments of the glass at the end of the wedding. Many couples have the new ritual of keeping the shards in a mezuzah or picture frame, a reminder of the wedding to cherish within their home. A constant reminder of how easily something can break without tender devotion, thoughtful care, and endless love.

This cannot be the time in which the Jewish community shrinks away, returning when the world looks a little safer, feels a little brighter. This cannot be the time in which we say to ourselves, Let someone else build it for me. This cannot be the time in which we let the fire that sustains our faith burn out.

This cannot be the message other generations use to describe us.

Let us each find a way to remain committed to sustaining the Jewish people. Do everything in your power to join a synagogue. Call your camp directors and let them know they are not alone. Reach out to Hillels and remind them of their worth. Keep your childs Jewish education alive and vibrant. Let your school administrators and educators know that you do not want to take this year off. It will be a struggle. But give your Jewish leaders the confidence in knowing that you want to struggle with us. May our children and grandchildren look back at this moment with honor and pride.

Yes, the world grew dark. But it was our light that brightened the way.

Rabbi Nicole Guzik has served as a rabbi at Sinai Temple for ten years. She focuses on innovative womens programming, young family retention and recruitment, and supervises Beit Bracha, Sinai Temples mainstreamed religious school for children with special needs.

Rabbi Guzik also writes a weekly Torah commentary in the Jewish Journal, A Bisl Torah.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are the authors own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Forward.

Read more here:

Let us each find a way to remain committed to sustaining the Jewish people - Forward

Gearing up to create unity from a distance on Lag B’Omer – JNS.org

Posted By on May 8, 2020

(May 8, 2020 / JNS) The holiday of Lag BOmer is one of the most boisterous events in Israel, in particular the bonfires in Meron at the tomb of one of the greatest Jewish sages, Rabbi Simeon bar Yochai. The second-century sage is considered by many the author of the Zohar, one of the most important works of Kabbalah, the mystical teaching of Judaism.

Rabbi Shimon requested that the day of his passing be observed joyfully, says Rabbi Shais Taub, a popular lecturer who writes about Jewish mysticism, about the minor Jewish holiday marked this year starting at sundown on May 11 through the evening of May 12. For hundreds of years, a part of those joyous events was the grand bonfire in Meron, a small northern town of close to a thousand residents.

On Lag BOmer, it becomes the hub of Israel, with two-dozen bonfires and nearly half a million people coming for 24 hours of celebration. To prepare for it takes an entire year and costs the government more than 15 million shekels (nearly $4.3 million). Despite the scaling down of COVID-19 restrictions in the country, this year the Ministry of Religious Affairs says there will be a much smaller version of celebration at the tomb out of precautions for the coronavirus pandemic thats still raging in many countries, including the United States. There will only be four bonfires, with the amount of participants limited to around 10 participants at each lighting.

In even more difficult times, there were lightings in Meron, according to Rabbi Yosef Shvinger, director of the National Center for Holy Places in Israel. I am happy that I have the merit to take part in continuing this tradition, even during this difficult time.

Subscribe to The JNS Daily Syndicateby email and never missour top stories

Several customs of the day includes going to the park, kids playing with bows and arrows, and, of course, those bonfires, complete with roasted marshmallows.

Haredi men take part in the celebration of the Jewish holiday of Lag BOmer on Mount Meron in northern Israel. May 7, 2015. Credit: Meir Vaknin/Flash90

It is probably unrealistic to partake in some of the more common customs of the day, says Taub. With that, he notes other customs that are connected to the talmudic story of a plague that killed 24,000 of the students of the first-century sage Rabbi Akiva could be marked. On Lag BOmer, it is said that the plague stopped. In our current situation, we could relate to this idea, and perhaps find relevance for ourselves. The idea of a plague coming to an end each of us can relate to as a cause for joy.

As a sign of mourning for the 24,000 students, after Passover many do not get their hair cut, listen to music, purchase new clothes or even marry. On Lag BOmer, says Taub, they are permitted, thus, If you have an instrument, play it, or listen to the Jewish music you enjoy.

A day memorable for families

With music in mind, every year Shloime and Mirele Greenwald enjoy an outdoor concert in their neighborhood of Brooklyn, N.Y. Our children always look forward to the joy and pomp in the Crown Heights streets, says Shloimy Greenwald. With being locked in for almost two months, a concert would do wonders. With experience in organizing a truck that traveled around the streets of heavily Jewish communities in Brooklyn with a band before Passover, he brainstormed together with Zalmy Cohen and Berel Junik a grand online Jewish concert.

There is nothing like music to bring joy on what would have been just another day in the house, says Greenwald, who will also be holding a fundraiser that day for Hatzalah, the volunteer ambulance corporation with branches across the United States. Just like other years, I want this day be memorable for families, and especially, the children.

In New York City, Romemu will be having an online evening of Lag BOmer teachings around the fire with music and song, followed by virtual attendees doing a dance of liberation in their homes.

Most synagogues contacted have said that while other years they may have done events, this year they will not be doing them.

At Chabad of West Boca Raton in Florida, they will be having a drive-by barbecuemeaning, cars can come for some kosher takeout food. Previously, they had a drive-by pickup of challah and chicken soup for Shabbat, which worked out well.

It was special to see everyone, says Chani Bukiet, co-director of the center with her husband, Rabbi Zalman Bukiet. It is sad be calling it special, however, people just want human contact. They want to see another face, they want a smile, a good word in person, even if it is from six feet away and with a mask on.

When they were thinking of what to do for Lag BOmer, in addition to their online Zoom and Facebook Live classes, they decided to do another drive-by. While we cannot hug each other, rub shoulders and sing Jewish songs in one place, for the days theme of Jewish unity, at least we can eat from the same barbecue, she says.

At Cheder Menachem Day School in North Brunswick, N.J., things wont be like they used to, says Rabbi Yaakov Chaiton, principal at the school, when every year they would go to a park to have fun. We are encouraging our students to go with their families to a safe place where there is greenery, such as their backyard, or remaining in a socially safe distance in a park for a picnic.

They will be encouraging the students to learn from the story of Rabbi Akiva. The Talmud, he says, tells that the calamity happened after they failed to exhibit respect for one another. We are teaching the students to foster love for their friends and even more in our difficult times with their siblings, by learning to be more respectful to one another.

Sefaria, the largest online resource for Jewish texts in Hebrew and English, wrote to subscribers that while they cannot do their usual holiday activities, they could always learn from Jewish teachings, timeless lessons of Lag BOmer.

Parading and uniting like never before

On their site are stories of Rabbi Akiva and Rabbi Simeon in their original source from the Talmud in Hebrew and English. Their team also compiled the sources to some of the customs of the day, including why many play with a bow and arrow. There is also a compilation of traditional and more modern songs for the holiday.

In this spirit, CKids, also run by the Chabad-Lubavitch movement, is creating an online event they are dubbing The Biggest Parade Ever. Local communities will be creating their own parades with children from local branches filming themselves at home holding banners on Jewish observance. With more than 500 local CKids clubs signed up for the event, parade organizers will merge childrens video clips from each branch that will then be broadcasted online to look as if they are celebrating together. While a grand parade in the past was in one city, says Zalman Loewenthal, director of CKids, today communities from across the globe, such as Honolulu, Melbourne, Buenos Aires and Los Angeles, will be parading and uniting like never before.

A child holds a poster to be part of a virtual Lag BOmer parade organized by CKids, which it is dubbing The Biggest Parade Ever. Source: Screenshot.

There will also be entertainment for the children during the marches, which were pre-filmed with social distancing, such as a science show by Dr. Schnitzel, in addition to singers and illusionists.

In several locations, Chabad Houses will be conducting a Lag BOmer car parade. In Atlanta, Chabad Intown will be driving along many of the streets with flags mounted on the cars and a truck playing a custom-made video about the themes of the day. A tracker will notify community members when they will be on their block, so that locals could stand near their doors and cheer on the proceedings. They will also be stopping at local hospitals with a message of thanks for their service and health-care workers.

Georgia was the first state to open up after receiving national criticism for technically not closing down at all. In fact, coronavirus cases have gone up in parts of the state since restrictions were eased earlier this week.

Michoel Goldin, aka Dr. Shnitzel, records a science show for CKids virtual Lag BOmer parade, which it is dubbing The Biggest Parade Ever. Credit: DrShnitzel.com

Still, the emissaries are stressing that safety precautionsand face masksare in order from the privacy of their own cars. But even seeing a bit of someones face, however, is something many are awaiting.

I have not seen almost anybody from our community, laments Dena Schusterman, co-director of Chabad Intown with her husband, Rabbi EliyahuShusterman. We have seen them through just Facebook, Instagram and during online classes.

She says that every time she sees someone one of her Zoom classes, she becomes emotional. I really want to cry. I just want to hug them, to socialize, to just be normal, she says.

Shusterman is looking forward to seeing the students in their school, and all the community members and many others who regularly attend their holiday events. While we will not be close, she makes a point of stressing, it will be a very emotional [somewhat] face-to-face reunion.

The times, she says, are difficult, but she keeps reminding herself not give up and to be the most creative we could be with social distancing, and create an atmosphere of excitement, of Jewish pride. This is the best that we can do.

Excerpt from:

Gearing up to create unity from a distance on Lag B'Omer - JNS.org

De Blasio’s disagreements with the health department – City & State

Posted By on May 8, 2020

On Friday, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio announced that New York City Health + Hospitals, the citys public hospital system, will be leading the citys new contact tracing program, with some assistance from the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.

De Blasios decision not to have the health department oversee this initiative, however, has struck some as odd and indicative of the mayors contentious relationship with the department. On Friday afternoon, city and state legislators wrote a letter condemning his decision to put the citys public hospital system in charge instead of the health department, which has 150 years of contact tracing experience.

New York City has the best health department in the nation, and possibly the world. The Department of Health & Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) has vast experience in infectious disease outbreaks and contact tracing. The move to strip it of the leadership of this critical program defies explanation and raises many practical concerns, the lawmakers wrote.

They also wrote that the health department has conducted contact tracing in many outbreaks and epidemics, from tuberculosis and venereal diseases in the 1930s, to more recently HIV/AIDS, Ebola, Hepatitis, and, thus far, COVID-19.

De Blasio has also created city coronavirus task forces, none of which are being led by city health officials. The mayor notably put his wife, first lady Chirlane McCray, in charge of one task force despite her not having a medical background. Like President Donald Trump, de Blasio frequently puts politics ahead of the advice of medical experts, regardless of the effect it may have on city residents.

During the onset of the citys COVID-19 outbreak, he based many of his decisions on his personal and political interests, particularly when it came to following the advice of the citys health department. De Blasio ignored its proposals to combat the virus in early March, and refused to anonymize nasal swab tests so they could be used to estimate the viruss spread. It wasnt until top city health department officials Bureau of Communicable Disease Assistant Commissioner Dr. Marcelle Layton and Deputy Health Commissioner Dr. Demetre Daskalakis threatened to resign that de Blasio agreed to close the citys schools, restaurants, bars and gyms.

The mayor has been butting heads with the department since he took office, when he lifted restrictions on the Hasidic Jewish circumcision ritual in 2015, despite numerous herpes infections that occurred because of it. That same year, amid a Legionnaires disease outbreak in the Bronx, he asked health officials to perform unnecessary tasks to make himself look good. And as recently as a measles outbreak that began in 2018, he failed to make measles vaccinations mandatory, which resulted in hundreds of cases of the illness.

Its not unusual for politicians and public health officials to clash, but de Blasios detestation of the citys health department is uniquely intense. Theres always a bit of a split between the political appointees, whose jobs are to make a mayor look good, and public health professionals, who sometimes have to make unpopular recommendations, a former head of the health department told The New Yorker. But, with the de Blasio people, that antagonism is 10 times worse. They are so much more impossible to work with than other administrations.

However, those who have worked with de Blasio have also recounted that the mayor tends to be dubious of all public health officials recommendations and has belabored them for hours. He certainly has no trust in his field of expert commissioners and high-ranking agency officials, a former City Hall official told Politico. If an expert at an agency says to him, Mayor this is whats happening, instead of granting that some truth and acting on it, he will laboriously poke and prod at that opinion for hours.

As recently as March 11, the mayor questioned the guidance of the World Health Organization, shortly after it had declared the coronavirus to be a global pandemic. I think we can say at this point in time, were looking at all the guidance, but with a bit of a trust but verify worldview, de Blasio said during a press conference.

While de Blasio was running for mayor in 2013, he promised the citys ultra-Orthodox Jewish community that he would overturn the citys metzitzah bpeh ritual requirements, a practice that involves a mohel sucking blood from a babys penis right after it has been circumcised. In 2012, the health department mandated that any parent who wanted their child to take part in the ritual must sign a consent form that acknowledged the risks involved. The order came after a baby who underwent the ritual contracted herpes and died in 2011.

During his first term as mayor, de Blasio delivered on his promise to lift these restrictions and asked that any cases of herpes be self-reported in 2015. But in 2017, it was revealed that six new herpes infections had been tied to the controversial ritual, which resulted in criticism of de Blasio, who has often been accused of being especially lenient when it comes to the citys Hasidic Jewish community. Its also worth noting that de Blasio represented much of Brooklyn's Hasidic community when he was a member of the City Council.

The city then threatened to tighten the restrictions if the Hasidic community failed to follow its lax guidelines for the circumcision ritual. Given how protective families are of mohels and the practice of metzitzah, working with families and the community when there is a new case of neonatal herpes continues to be our better option, the health department said in 2017. That said, our main priority is to protect the health of babies, if the community is not living up to the deal announced in 2015, well go back to the drawing board and start over.

In October 2018, measles broke out in the Williamsburg, Brooklyn, Hasidic community after anti-vaccination literature had been plastered and shared throughout the community. Many felt de Blasio was, again, giving the Hasidim liberties he wouldnt give others by allowing them to opt out of vaccinations for religious reasons, despite there being nothing included in the Talmud about avoiding vaccination.

It wasnt until April, after 250 measles cases had been identified, that the mayor declared a public health emergency and called for mandatory measles vaccinations for people in Williamsburg. The mayor should have gone out sooner and gave the push to say people should be vaccinated without coming out and saying were going to do penalties and to strong-arm anyone, City Councilman Chaim Deutsch told Politico in April 2019. You need to be diplomatic in the way you come out. You cant come out with force all of a sudden. You need to come out and say, Listen, we need you to work with us. This is an epidemic now in the city, and its getting worse and worse.

The health department also said something should have been done sooner to combat anti-vaccination sentiments. Our missed opportunity is not being louder earlier about the anti-vax sentiment, Daskalakis told Politico at the time.

In 2015, the city faced a Legionnaires' disease outbreak that killed at least 12 people and infected at least 130 in the Bronx. While de Blasio was receiving praise for his handling of the situation in the media, the health department was dealing with his politically driven and unnecessary inspection of water cooling towers in the Bronx. The mayor made health officials inspect the towers for traces of the disease, even though the source of the outbreak, a Bronx hotel, had already been identified. The preponderance of medical and scientific information available now points to one of the original five sites as the source of this outbreak, with the Opera House Hotel as the most likely source of the outbreak, a city official told The New York Times in 2015, as investigations into the outbreak were still underway.

Officials felt the move was calculated, meant to signify to the press that the mayor had done everything he could to contain the outbreak. De Blasio also tried to get then-Deputy Commissioner of Environmental Health Daniel Kass fired, after he refused to follow de Blasios pointless direction. But Mary Bassett, then the commissioner of the citys health department, refused. Dan Kass is one of the best environmental health experts in the country, Bassett told The New Yorker. New York has one of the best health departments in the United States, possibly the world. Wed all be better off if we were listening really closely to them right now.

Read this article:

De Blasio's disagreements with the health department - City & State

How Jewish mystics sought to vanquish Hitler and the coronavirus – Haaretz

Posted By on May 8, 2020

This past Purim, in late March, a delegation of kabbalists and rabbis from Jerusalem flew over Israel in a helicopter, praying and blowing shofars and horns. Their aim was to prevent the spread of the coronavirus in Israel. I imagine that you, in contrast to many others, were not amazed by this.

Not only was I not amazed, I was even happy. Truly. First of all, ritual activity of this type is a facet of Jewish culture that interests me very much. The second reason I wasnt amazed is that this wasnt the first time this has happened. There were precedents.

You write about one of them in your article, Three Charms for Killing Adolf Hitler [an abridged version exists in English]. In 1940, a similar flight took place also originating in Jerusalem. At that time the kabbalists goal was to protect the Land of Israel from the Nazis.

They wanted specifically to protect the country against an invasion by [the Germans]. Their flight took place over the countrys borders, and they prayed and slaughtered white roosters in the air and sprayed their blood from on high. The flight was only part of a larger effort by kabbalists in Jerusalem to block an invasion and vanquish Hitler. From their point of view, by the way, it worked: Rommel failed at El Alamein [in 1942] and was forced to retreat. Its not an especially famous event, but if you peruse historical sources closely, you can trace its course.

Lets concentrate on the similarities between these ceremonial acts. What does flying over the country symbolize?

The idea is that you demarcate a particular region and create a protected space within it. Magical-mystical activity of this kind also took place in the Talmudic period among the Babylonian Jews, who designated certain spaces as safe against demons. The principle is to isolate a specific area and protect it, and this repeats itself even in as basic an act as drawing the circle of Honi Hameagel [a 1st-century B.C.E. Jewish teacher, who according to the Talmud drew a circle around himself to beseech God for rain during a drought], for example. Its interesting to note that the Jerusalem kabbalists perceived Hitler and the Nazis as both evil itself and as its emissaries.

Three-headed snake

Confronting Hitler is tantamount to confronting the sitra ahra [Aramaic for the other side, meaning the realm of evil].

That is stated explicitly in some of the few [kabbalistic] testimonies that have been preserved. A kabbalist named Mutzafi, for example, relates that after he took part in activities of that kind, he saw in a dream an iron snake with three heads. The snake warned him that he was taking on the sitra ahra, and that nothing can truly harm the sitra ahra. Mutzafi decided to make do with praying for the evil to bypass the Jewish people, and not to target Hitler and his cohorts specifically.

Its a very dangerous struggle. If the conception is that the reality we see is merely a reflection of cosmic struggles that are occurring against the divinity, then evil according to the kabbalist perception possesses tremendous power. Each person has to decide how much of a risk he is willing to take.

You cite a long list of means adopted to fight the Nazis: special prayers, self-denial and fasting, rituals and gatherings at Rachels Tomb and at tombs of tzaddikim (righteous men).

The 1940 flight was one episode amid a great struggle by kabbalists and rabbis in Jerusalem. There were defensive actions, aimed at asking for mercy, to induce God to mobilize and help such as prayers, prostrations on graves of holy men, weeping and pleading. At the same time, there were also more aggressive acts.

My research on this subject started with a piece of paper I found in the National Library: a note that someone wrote to Rabbi Eliyahu Dehuki, titled Three charms for killing Adolf Hitler. It captivated me immediately. We have an extensive and fascinating literature of magical practices that has accompanied the Jewish people from the fifth century on how to manipulate reality by means of ritual. Someone took three recipes from that body of work and provided them to Dehuki, one of the lesser-known kabbalists in Jerusalem at that time. They are very aggressive recipes, by the way two of them entail killing an animal.

In Hitlers name

Killing a rooster. It had to be purchased in Hitlers name and then slaughtered or, horrifically, buried alive.

These recipes make use of what is known as the principle law of similarity: the attempt to bring about in reality something that has been performed in a symbolic way; and the principle of contact: to take something that was in contact with someone upon whom we wish to exercise the magic his clothing, fingernails or hair and to make use of it.

If you act on the object that represents someone, you are effectively acting on the one represented by it. Accordingly, if you are supposed to be slaughtering a rooster, it is impossible to make do with any random fowl. The recipe calls for the rooster to be purchased in Hitlers name, so that already on the occasion of acquiring it you create the connection between the object and what it signifies and then you raise it at home under the name of Hitler. Through the name and through the intentionality [of your actions], an association is forged between the rooster and Hitler.

Judaism attributes vast importance to a name and finds a deep connection between it and the essence [of the individual]. For example, if someone who is very ill goes to a rabbi, the rabbi may instruct him to change his name or to add a letter to it, in order to be cured. The act of slaughtering a fowl or, unfortunately, of burying it alive in the earth, as the recipe calls for, is intended to create a reality that will affect the real Hitler. And according to the law of similarity, when I slaughter that rooster, Hitler will be slaughtered likewise.

Great importance is also associated to the name of Hitlers mother. The kabbalists took the trouble to find out her name. Some of the sources you quote refer to him as Adolf Hitler son of Klara.

Magic is not some sort of hocus-pocus Lets do something and see what happens. You need to know the mothers name, because its important to aim precisely at the object of the forces we will unleash. We want the recipe to work on Adolf Hitler, son of Klara, and not for the evil forces to operate on some other, innocent Adolf Hitler.

In some of the sources you cite, she is actually called Gertrude. How did the kabbalists manage to establish her name?

There are several places where texts were amended, where the word Gertrude was erased and replaced by Klara. I imagine that they had connections with the British and were able to find out through them.

There is no real evidence that the plane flight took place you learned about it from indirect testimony.

For a long time I tried to understand whether it happened in reality. I looked for corroboration and proof. I talked at length to the novelist Haim Beer about it; he wrote about the flight in one of his books. He gave me access to his archive and shared with me newspaper clippings and other materials.

There is a lot of insistent testimony concerning the very fact of the event, but I also could not help but ask myself questions about its feasibility. For example, where did Jerusalem rabbis and kabbalists get hold of a plane in 1940? In the end, I found a newspaper article in which [the engineer and film producer] Wim Van Leer, who was a pilot, relates that he met the pilot of that flight. The latter described the scene of a plane filled with cages of fowls and blood, and talked about the kabbalists bloodstained white clothes. It was very colorful.

Rommel and the Brits

Can you bring yourself to believe another claim, according to Van Leers account: namely, that the British were the ones who asked the kabbalists to help them try to block the Nazis? That thats how they obtained the plane?

No. I absolutely dont buy that. But theres no doubt that there was some sort of connection between the kabbalists and the British authorities.

Lets take a step back for a moment and try to understand the nature of this type of thinking the notion that history is now unfolding in Germany and I, a kabbalist from Jerusalem, have the privilege and the ability to alter reality and influence the course of history.

The perception is that the reality in Israel is a product of a cosmic reality, over which the kabbalists tried to exert influence. The question they undoubtedly asked themselves was whether they were facing a situation of hiding of the face of God when God turns away from us because of something we did and for which we must try to atone, to seek mercy and forgiveness or whether this is a crisis of the divinity that requires repair, meaning we must resort to ritual acts.

The whole world is being managed all the time under divine supervision, and the way to activate it, according to the Jerusalem kabbalists, is by way of various rituals. We must act from down below upward in order to improve the situation of the whole world whether by participating in an act against the sitra ahra, or by requesting the [dead] tzaddikim to act on our behalf.

The 2020 flight also ended with a prayer, uttered above the tomb of Rabbi Meir Baal Haness [in Tiberias], and with a gathering at the tomb of Rashbi [Rabbi Shimon Bar Yochai, on Mt. Meron]. There is a desire to harness the powers of the righteous for the great cause.

Rashbi is [traditionally said to be] the author of the Zohar, the foundational work of kabbala, and worship of the tzaddikim and the understanding that they can work for us are part of the kabbalist approach. During the period of the [flourishing of the] kabbala in Safed, many rituals were practiced that were associated with the graves of the tzaddikim. The Lag Baomer festivities on Mount Meron constitute an extremely significant religious gathering, even by international criteria.

Be that as it may, the perception of magic here is practical. A toolbox. Its not something remote and theoretical. Its perhaps more like recipes in a cookbook. Its a matter for technicians.

There is a great similarity. Just as a cookbook recipe explains, step by step, what you need to do in order to bake a cheesecake from the ingredients and how they are mixed, to the baking and if you follow it meticulously you will get a cheesecake, it is the same with the recipes for magic. I noted in my book [Jewish Magic Before the Rise of Kabbalah, English version published in 2017] that magic is quite a boring thing, maybe best suited to technicians, but the concept behind it is amazing.

The literature of magic is actually a map of human existence. It aims to deal with life, and it brings to the surface distress, needs and difficulties in a manner thats both unrestrained and uncensored. Nothing is silenced and nothing is swept under the rug. No other genre provides precise instructions for how to summon the dead into a dream in order to ask them questions, how to cause a couple to separate or how to catch a thief.

Are these instructions meant for kabbalists only, or are laypeople also allowed to use magical recipes?

The literature of magical recipes does not state who the instructions are meant for. But its clear that if you must perform purification rites or refrain from speaking over three days, in order to acquire the ability to act as is set forth, for example, in the early magical text Harba de-Moshe [The Sword of Moses] then apparently its not intended for everyone; and it might be easier to go to someone who is known to be qualified in the practice.

Some sources also refer to the danger involved in having anything to do with forces of this kind. On the other hand, many recipes describe relatively simple procedures that anyone can carry out certainly in an instance like if you fall into a well, when it might otherwise be quite difficult to find someone to rescue you.

Forbidden practice

Lets talk about the fundamental dispute concerning magic namely, that its practice is forbidden in Judaism.

Categorically, magic is forbidden. It is written, Thou shalt not suffer a sorceress to live [Exodus 22:17]. The punishment for a sorcerer or sorceress is death by stoning. The sages reiterated this in the Mishna and the Talmud. The Scriptures state explicitly that it is prohibited to enlist the aid of mediums, magicians, whisperers and so forth.

Yes, because the Chosen People was given an alternative: prophets from among them. But arent Moses deeds acts of magic?

No one will say that Moses is a magician or a sorcerer, because that is forbidden. So the terminology of the miracle is invoked. But what is he actually doing? He is changing reality. In terms of halakha [traditional religious law], that is absolutely forbidden. The question then becomes how to live with this. How do you reconcile such a prohibition with a reality in which you dont want to dismiss such forces you dont want to dissociate yourself from Elijah who stops the rain and ascends to heaven in a storm. Or from Elisha, of whom it is said that even his bones could resurrect the dead.

In order not to sideline all these heroes, we need to explain why what they do is all right, whereas what others do is prohibited. There are all kinds of complex systems of explanations, which I dont think we need to go into here; at the same time, there are some legal authorities who declare that magic is indeed banned by the Torah and that it is an idolatrous influence on Judaism.

You said earlier that magic is a practical matter, but within it one has to draw a distinction between magic that is intended to help to heal the sick, find a partner, assist one in ones livelihood, etc. and harmful magic, namely magical practice that is intended to hurt someone, do him ill.

I believe there are very few people who are capable of deriving pleasure or benefit from doing harm for harms sake. In the course of fieldwork I did among people who inscribe amulets and create magical plates, I sat with one man in his impressive workroom in Kiryat Gat. After a lengthy conversation I asked if he also did things that were intended to cause harm. He pointed to an object on the table and said, A woman asked me to inscribe that amulet against her husband, because he beat and abused her so did I do a good deed or a bad deed?

When the Jerusalem kabbalists try to kill Hitler, were they doing a good deed or a bad deed? There are very few magical recipes I am familiar with that are for the benefit of society as a whole [as opposed to intended to address a specific problem]. Magic is meant to help a person with his own private troubles. The Book of Secrets contains a recipe for getting rid of a debtor who is putting pressure you. Obviously, if you owe someone money and instead of paying him back you try to get rid of him that is mafia-style magic. But as with life, so with magic. It reflects life as it is, and if you have a particular need, you get a response, even if its not nice.

Its not pretty, but its certainly human.

It deals with humanity, without any embellishment. The literature [of magic] brings to the surface wishes, desires, anxieties, ambitions, jealousies and in a collective way. It is a cumulative literature, a kind of collective knowledge that people pass from one to another, adding and copying things. Its folklore in the sense of broad popular knowledge that expresses a common identity.

Is pulsa denura, for example, a harmful magical practice?

Pulsa denura, Aramaic for lashes of fire, is a ceremony that rests on what is known as herem kol bo, a ban or excommunication, which comes from Sefer Kol Bo, an Ashkenazi compendium from the Middle Ages. Is it a harmful magical practice? The question is whether you want to call it magic at all. I am certain that those who perform the ceremony would not consider it magic.

The ceremony of the excommunication of Hitler by the Jerusalem kabbalists, which is also based on the herem kol bo, was performed in a synagogue. They opened the Holy Ark, took out the scrolls and cursed Hitler, Goebbels and Goering. I dont think that in their opinion they were engaged in magic. From their viewpoint, they would not involve the Torah scrolls, which embody the divine presence, in a forbidden act of magic. They defined for themselves what they were doing as being permitted; like, lets say, using amulets.

Are amulets considered to have magical properties?

There are those who deride them, but they are not illegitimate. No one will be excommunicated for writing amulets. Rabbis write amulets.

So, there are semantic games at work.

Yes. There are semantic games. I dont walk around with a box of religion and a box of magic. I think there are many points where there is an overlap, and there also many things in common, so its a matter of semantics and the way things are seen.

Almost all the kabbalists who massed their forces to repel the aggressor are of Eastern origin. Was the practical kabbala identified more with Mizrahim?

There were also some of Ashkenazi origin. But there was a far greater presence of kabbalists of Sephardi [or Mizrahi] origin in Jerusalem. There is no doubt of that at all. Its a sensitive subject, so I am weighing my words. You know, Hasidism itself is based on a belief in the power of the tzaddik, and in practice on the supernatural power of the tzaddik. His ability to affect events in the world, to bring down abundance from above that can be called the miracle-working side of the tzaddik, and it can also be called the magical side.

And Hasidism, as we know, is not a Mizrahi stream.

At home I have a bottle of water from the mikveh [ritual bath] of the Lubavitcher Rebbe his body touched the water, and therefore, in cases of distress or sickness, it can heal. Because of the fact that it was in contact with a righteous man, it bears something of his virtuous quality and can act in the world.

Ill put it differently: How, in the end, did Jewish magical practice become the preserve of the Mizrahim? What political-cultural development led to that identification or appropriation?

The tradition of affecting reality, whether by appealing to tzaddkim or by means of utterances, ceremonies or speaking holy names is rooted in Judaism long before the terms Ashkenazi and Mizrahi came into use. It begins with the idea of God who created the world by means of speech, and because we are in his image, our speech, too, has the power to affect reality. The Gemara states that if the righteous so wished, they would be capable of creating a world.

I did not study that topic nor am I an expert in it, but in general it is always worth examining what magical beliefs and deeds represent to those who criticize them.

The important distinction is not between Mizrahim and Ashkenazim, as magical elements exist in the religious-traditionalist culture of both groups, but between those who are perceived by critics as primitive and therefore inferior, and what they perceive as enlightened and developed namely, adhering to their own values. In the end it comes down to a battle over identity and power, and the relations between them.

Continue reading here:

How Jewish mystics sought to vanquish Hitler and the coronavirus - Haaretz

Unorthodox and empty insight – WORLD News Group

Posted By on May 8, 2020

Men in dark formal suits, with long hair protruding from under their hats, stride purposefully through New Yorks streets. Women with wigs and conservative dresses push strollers on Brooklyns sidewalks.

The Hasidic community is an enigma to most of us, a world of mysterious Old World tradition in 21st-century America. Perhaps thats why a series like Unorthodox is so intriguing: It promises insight into a culture that seems so different.

The four-part Netflix series is based on the memoirs of Deborah Feldman, a Hasidic Jew who grew up in Williamsburg, N.Y. Feldman (named Esther or Esty in the series) rejects her religion, her community, and her unhappy marriage when she flees America for Berlin.

Like most teens, Esther wants to fit in but has always felt different. She lives with her grandparents. Her father is an alcoholic, living on the edges of the Hasidic community and disappointing his parents. Her mother left when Esty was a child. Her arranged marriage to Yanky Shapiro gives her hope for a normal life. But an overbearing mother-in-law, an unhappy marital life, and the lack of children make Esty even more unhappy. She throws it away and flees to her estranged mother, now a virtual stranger living in Berlin.

Her community doesnt take this sitting down. We cant have our people losing their way. It sets a bad precedent, says a rabbi. They send husband Yanky with his more worldly, dangerous cousin Moishe to bring Esty home.

In some ways, Unorthodox is not unique. As we grow up, we learn our church or communitys norms are not the only possible answers to lifes questions. We accept them as true or choose a different path. Some of Unorthodoxs agonizing scenes are when lost Esty reaches out to her beloved grandma, desperate for love and care. Her grandmother rejects her. Meanwhile, the extremely insular and restrictive nature of the Hasidic world make Estys flight to freedom more understandable.

But Estys journey does not take her closer to God: She never searches the Bible for answers or looks for meaning beyond the truisms of humanist values. The community of Berlin musicians that she joins is kind and accepting, but they represent modern values devoid of any room for the God of the Bible and His revelation of law and redemption. We can understand that Esther wants to leave the Hasidic community, but we cannot rejoice that in her new life she has no room for Christianity.

Unorthodox is not for young viewers, with its awkwardly humorous depiction of an unhappy marital sex life focused only on baby production. Further, Estys new friends accept homosexuality. She is unfaithful to her husband while still married, though the series doesnt show this explicitly. Viewers should also be aware of brief female nudity during a ritual cleansing bath.

Continue reading here:

Unorthodox and empty insight - WORLD News Group

Crown Heights Nears Top Of Social Distancing Summonses: Data – Prospect Heights, NY Patch

Posted By on May 8, 2020

CROWN HEIGHTS, BROOKLYN Crown Heights is a hot spot of social distancing violations or at least sits in a swath of Brooklyn where cops have cracked down more than nearly any other place in the city.

Newly-released NYPD data shows cops in the 77th Precinct covering north Crown Heights issued 22 social distancing summons that's the fourth-most of any police precinct.

It also neighbors the top three police precincts for social distancing tickets. They sit in a mostly-unbroken stretch of Brooklyn from Williamsburg to Canarsie, which led the city with 66 summonses.

Those four Brooklyn precincts the 69th, 90th, 73rd and 77th accounted for 155 summonses, according to the data. That's 41 percent of all summons issued citywide for social distancing.

NYPD Data - Most social dis... by Matt Troutman on Scribd

To keep up to date with coronavirus developments in Crown Heights, sign up for Patch's news alerts and newsletter.

Social distancing enforcement has become a hot-button issue after videos circulated of violent NYPD arrests of people of color in Brooklyn. Police only arrested one white person out of 40-such arrests in Brooklyn.

Crown Heights is not only home to significant communities of color, but also another community who have received attention for social distancing Hasidic Jews.

Mayor Bill de Blasio drew intense criticism last week when he appeared to single out what he called the "Jewish community" after large Hasidic funeral in Williamsburg. Police soon after cracked down on a Hasidic Jewish funeral in Borough Park.

Many in the Hasidic Jewish community have said such large gatherings, while highly visible, don't represent the majority of people who follow social distancing guidelines.

Regardless, the issue of unequal enforcement of social distancing was given stark visual contrast over last weekend. Nice weather brought out largely-white crowds to city parks, where police officers handed out masks. Meanwhile, videos showed people in color in Brooklyn being arrested and threatened with arrest for not social distancing.

Brooklyn accounted for 206 out of 374 social distancing summons, NYPD data shows. Just 42 of those summonses in Brooklyn went to white people.

People of color citywide accounted for 80 percent of all social distancing summonses.

Coronavirus In NYC: Latest Happenings And Guidance

Email PatchNYC@patch.com to reach a Patch reporter or fill out this anonymous form to share your coronavirus stories. All messages are confidential.

Read more from the original source:

Crown Heights Nears Top Of Social Distancing Summonses: Data - Prospect Heights, NY Patch

More Jewish shows and movies to watch while stuck at home – The Jewish News of Northern California

Posted By on May 8, 2020

Youve finished Fauda on Netflix, The Plot Against America on HBO and The Marvelous Mrs. Maiselon Amazon Prime and perhaps the rest of the Jewish and Israeli content from my hunkered down at home viewing suggestions on March 18.

But theres still plenty of Jewish content to tackle.

Todays bounty of Judaically infused content is primed and ready for the cheers, jeers and general over-analysis (based on your personal Jewish lens) that we apply to our media consumption.

So lets create our own at-home film festivals and screening sessions to explore the context of what were watching.

Think critically. Feel deeply about what youre watching. And ask the usual questions.

As you discuss any show or film with Jewish themes, use these questions to launch conversations and controversies around the content:

Presentation: Does this show or film present Jews as victims, justice-seekers, aggressors or with any stereotypical Jewish characteristics? How do you feel about how Jews are presented? (Answers may include: Jews are always victims, Jews have to be careful about not being seen as aggressors and remember the Holocaust.)

Your experiences: Does the portrayal of Jewish life and practice in this show or film resonate with your own Jewish experience? Why or why not? Find a moment or character whom you can relate to, even if their personal practice doesnt match your own (might as well find a way to encourage empathy during quarantine).

Identity and content: How does a characters Jewish identity or commentary serve the content? For instance, in Showtimes 2018 fantasy-comedy The House With a Clock in Its Walls (available online on several platforms), a character who lost her husband and daughter in the Holocaust gasses a room of dolls. Yes, theyre creepy and evil dolls, but visually it looks as if shes gassing effigies of children. How do we feel about this?

Good for the Jews?: Overall, is this TV show or film good for the Jews? (The answer is always simultaneously yes, no and remember the Holocaust.)

Now, here are some suggestions for making your own film festivals, double features and film school screening sessions.

The Goldbergs was a popular radio show from 1929 to 1946 and then a comedy-drama on TV from 1949 to 1956 with the catchphrase Yoo-hoo! Mrs. Goldberg. Check out this episode on YouTube and compare it to ABCs sitcom, which is just concluding its seventh season. How has the world changed for Jews, in the world at-large and in Hollywood? How has Jewish representation on TV changed?

This is a matchup of a Broadway and big-screen musical classic against a comedy about a Polish rabbi (Gene Wilder) traveling across the American frontier to San Francisco, with Harrison Ford as a bank robber who befriends him. Sounds crazy, no? Compare shtetls and perceptions of America, as well as attitudes toward Torah and observances of Shabbat. Both are available for rental from YouTube, iTunes, Google Play and Amazon Prime.

Which is your favorite pair of scheming Broadway producers who ogle a tall blonde woman and take advantage of old ladies in order to fund a musical about Hitler, hoping that it will close immediately? Zero Mostel and Gene Wilder in the 1967 version? Or Nathan Lane and Matthew Broderick in 2005? Both can be rented on YouTube, Google Play or Amazon Prime, or found on other platforms.

In the following movies and TV shows, discuss how Orthodox and ultra-Orthodox communities are depicted. Are the depictions rendered with love, respect, disdain, frustration or resentment? Based on these portrayals, how do you perceive the American or Israeli Orthodox community? How do these movies and TV shows portray women? And what does it mean for characters to accept or reject the values of the community around them?

Heres my list: the 1992 movie A Stranger Among Us, directed by Sidney Lumet and starring Melanie Griffith as a cop who goes undercover in a Hasidic community (rent it on YouTube, Google Play or Amazon Prime); the 1998 movie A Price Above Rubies, starring Rene Zellwegger as an Orthodox Jew (find it on HBO Now, YouTube, iTunes, Google Play or Amazon Prime); the 2001 documentary Trembling Before G-d, about gay and lesbian Orthodox Jews (rent on Amazon Prime); the 2017 documentary One of Us, about Orthodox Jews facing ostracism and anxiety (Netflix); the 2020 fictional miniseries Unorthodox, about an unhappy Hasidic woman who leaves Brooklyn (Netflix); and the Israeli two-season drama Shtisel, about a fictional, traditionally religious family in Jerusalem (Netflix).

Make this a film festival! And afterward discuss Jews and power: What do we think about Jews exerting power? What Jewish texts support the ideas of justice and revenge? Whats the difference between justice and revenge? Is revenge ever justified?

I suggest these films: the 2009 Quentin Tarantino film Inglourious Basterds, in which a band of fighters, including Brad Pitt, track down and graphically slay Nazis (Netflix, or rent it on YouTube, iTunes, Google Play or Amazon Prime); the 2018 drama Operation Finale, about the search for and extraction of Adolf Eichmann from South America to stand trial in Israel (Hulu, or rent it on YouTube, iTunes, Google Play or Amazon Prime); the 2005 Steven Spielberg action-drama movie Munich, in which an Israeli special ops squad is tasked with finding and assassinating the terrorists who massacred Israelis at the 1972 Olympics; actor Guri Weinberg plays his own father, Moshe, who was one of the Israeli athletes killed. (Rent it on YouTube, iTunes, Google Play or Amazon Prime).

Bottom line: Theres more content now than there used to be, with more being added all the time. So tune in, get creative, get cerebral. Netflix and kvell and Purell. And, as always, #RememberTheHolocaust.

More here:

More Jewish shows and movies to watch while stuck at home - The Jewish News of Northern California

BBC – History – World Wars: Denying the Holocaust

Posted By on May 8, 2020

Disappearances

Buchenwald camp survivorsSome deniers posit that the Jews said to have been killed under the Nazi regime actually survived the war, and succeeded in avoiding detection by going to places such as the Soviet Union or the United States. In these countries, the deniers claim, there were already so many Jews that no one noticed a couple of million more.

Deniers such as Arthur Butz offer other equally fantastic explanations as to the supposed 'disappearance' of millions of Jews. Many of those who were reported killed in the war, he suggests, actually survived - but did not re-establish contact with their pre-war relatives because they were in bad marriages. After the war they found other partners, established better relationships, started a new life and failed to correct the record. This improbable explanation of why these people deserted their families would be hilarious, were the topic not so serious.

The real facts are much better documented. For example, it is known that Nazis used gas buses at one point to murder Jews (eventually they abandoned this system because it was not efficient enough). This is known partly because SS-Major General Dr Harald Turner, chief of the German Administration in Serbia, wrote to Karl Wolff, chief of Heinrich Himmler's personal staff, on 11 April 1942.

In the note Turner describes a 'delousing van' - the quotation marks around the word already suggest that it is a euphemism - then makes it quite clear what this means:

Additional details about these buses are to be found in a letter from Willy Just to SS Lieutenant Colonel Walter Rauff on 5 June 1942. In the letter, Just describes how a load of '97,000 have been processed'. He leaves little doubt about the nature of the load, when he writes about it pushing against the door as a result of 'fear aroused by the darkness'.

Just also offers Rauff a series of suggestions on how the vans might be improved. Since there was a problem of 'off-road manoeuvrability', he suggests that the cargo area be reduced. This would make the operation more efficient, because '... were the cargo area smaller, but fully occupied, the operation would take considerably less time, because there would be no empty space.'

Deniers find it impossible to 'explain away' these kinds of documents so they generally ignore them.

Most of all, deniers focus on the extermination camp run by the Nazis at Auschwitz. They claim - despite overwhelming documentary and physical evidence as well as eye-witness accounts by both perpetrators and victims - that it was not an extermination camp. They ignore or try to explain away evidence that leaves no doubt as to Auschwitz's nefarious purposes. A small sample of the many pieces of documentary evidence demonstrates the far-fetched nature of their claims.

Though the Germans made concerted attempts to avoid direct references to the gassings that took place in the camp, sometimes even those in the upper echelons slipped up. On 29 January 1943, for example, SS Captain Bischoff, head of the Auschwitz Central Construction Management, wrote to officials in Berlin regarding Crematorium 2, and in this letter he referred to a Vergasungskeller (gassing cellar).

In the Auschwitz archives one can inspect the architectural drawings for Crematoria 4 and 5. These call for 30 x 40cm windows, through which Zyklon B was to be thrown. In February 1943 the Auschwitz Construction Office issued a work order for the 'production of 12 gas-tight doors (window shutters) approximately 30/40cm'. In Auschwitz there remain a number of decrepit 30 x 40cm window shutters. The remnants of a gas-tight seal are still visible around their edges. The handle for closing the windows is on the outside, a decidedly impractical arrangement for any room, unless one wanted to ensure that those inside could not open them.

On 28 February, according to the civilian contractors' daily time-sheets, the gas-tight shutters were installed. A time-sheet dated 2 March 1943, and submitted by the contractor for work on Crematorium 4, mentions a 'concrete floor in gas chamber'. These documents indicate that by March 1943 workers officially designated a room in Crematorium 4 a 'gas chamber'.' The drawings, work order, time-sheets, and remaining windows constitute a simple but stunning example of the confluence of evidence concerning the gassing of prisoners at the camp.

Deniers also claim that the gas chambers were actually delousing chambers or morgues. But the documentary evidence proves this a bogus claim. In a letter dated 31 March, Bischoff refers to a 'gas [tight] door' for Crematorium 2, which was to be fitted with a rubberised sealing strip and a peephole for inspection. The deniers fail to explain why a door for a delousing chamber or morgue would need a peephole.

Another claim is that the gas chambers were air-raid shelters. This argument ignores the fact that these supposed shelters were too small to house the camp inmates, and were over a kilometer away from where the guards were quartered - a decidedly silly arrangement if these shelters were meant to protect them. Furthermore, the doors had a metal grille over the peephole on the inside of the door - to protect the glass from being broken from within - exactly the opposite of where it would be were it the door for an air-raid shelter. And indeed there were proper one- or two-person air-raid shelters for guards around the camp. They are still visible at the perimeter of Birkenau.

Most importantly, to support their position, deniers also have to ignore testimony given by perpetrators such as Hans Stark, a member of the Auschwitz 'Gestapo.' At his trial Stark described the killing process.

Stark told the court that, because the Zyklon B '... was in granular form, it trickled down over the people as it was being poured in. They then started to cry out terribly for they now knew what was happening to them.'

In February 1943 Auschwitz camp building authorities complained to Topf, the company that built the crematoria equipment, that they needed ventilation blowers 'most urgently'. Why the urgency, if this was an air-raid shelter, morgue, or delousing chamber?

Deniers hypothesise that the urgency was a result of official fears that the camp would be hit with a typhus epidemic, which would cause a tremendous spike in the death toll. Without the proper ventilation system, the crematoria would not be able to operate.

Deniers try to bolster their argument about the typhus by pointing to documents which show that at this point in time the planned monthly incineration rate of Auschwitz had been boosted to 120,000 bodies. Deniers claim this was because of the typhus epidemic. However, the camp's projected population was 150,000. For the deniers' explanation to make sense, in one month an epidemic would have to kill four-fifths of Auschwitz's population and the Germans would have to repopulate the camp with 120,000 people. This claim exceeded the absolute worst case epidemiological scenario.

On 6 March 1943, one of the civilian employees working on the construction of Crematorium 2 referred to the air extraction system of 'Auskleidekeller [undressing cellar] 2'. No normal morgue could require an undressing room, particularly one that was 50 yards long. In that same month, there were at least four additional references to Auskleidekeller. It is telling that civilians who, according to the deniers, were in Birkenau to work on underground morgues, repeatedly referred not to morgues but to the ventilation of the 'undressing cellars'.

In the same letter the employee asked about preheating the areas that would be used as the gas chamber. If these were morgues they should be cooled, not preheated. Heating a gas chamber, on the other hand, would speed the gassing process by more quickly vaporising the gas from the Zyklon B.

A letter dated 31 March 1943, regarding Crematorium 3, spoke of it as having a Gastr, a gas door. Deniers argue that this could mean many things. But the inventory attached to the handover documents for the crematorium states that it had a Gasdichtetr, a 'gas-tight door'. One might argue about the meaning of Gastr, but it is hard to squabble over a gas-tight door.

Deniers have said for years that physical evidence is lacking because they have seen no holes in the roof of the Birkenau gas chamber where the Zyklon was poured in. (In some of the gas chambers the Zyklon B was poured in through the roof, while in others it was thrown in through the windows.) The roof was dynamited at war's end, and today lies broken in pieces, but three of the four original holes were positively identified in a recent paper. Their location in the concrete matches with eyewitness testimony, aerial photos from 1944, and a ground photo from 1943. The physical evidence shows unmistakably that the Zyklon holes were cast into the concrete when the building was constructed.

There is much additional evidence affirming Auschwitz/Birkenau's role as a killing centre. There is no reputable evidence that affirms the deniers' claims.

Anne FrankDeniers have repeatedly attacked the authenticity of the famous Diary of Anne Frank, which tells of the young Jewish author's experiences as she and her family hid from Nazi persecution in Holland. It seems they believe that by creating doubts about this popular book, which is often a young person's first encounter with the literature of the Holocaust, they can generate broader doubts about the Holocaust itself. Their attacks on the diary became so widespread, that eventually the Netherlands State Institute for War Documentation, the archives to which Anne's father left the work, subjected the glue, paper and ink of the diary to extensive forensic tests. They found them all to be from the 1940s.

The investigators compared Anne's handwriting in the diary to other samples of her writing, including letters she wrote before going into hiding, and traditional student autograph books she signed before the war. The tests found the handwriting to be that of the same person. In fact, every test to which the diary was subjected proved that this was a genuine World War Two era work by a teenager.

Deniers also argue that there are multiple versions of the Diary of Anne Frank. This, they claim, proves it is a fraud. Actually, there are multiple versions of the diary, and Anne herself explains why this is so. In 1944, a Dutch government official, broadcasting from London, urged the population to save eyewitness accounts of their wartime experience, including memorabilia and diaries. Hearing this, Anne, decided to rewrite some of the entries. She also used her diary as a basis for a novel, The Annexe. Hence the different versions.

Deniers also make the claim that the diary is in green ballpoint pen, something that was not readily available during the war. And there are, in fact, some minor stylistic marginal notes in green ink. However, as the Dutch investigation demonstrated, the only ballpoint writing is on two scraps of paper included among the loose leaves, and these have no significance whatsoever in terms of content. Moreover, the handwriting on the scraps of paper differs markedly from those in the diary, indicating that they were written by someone else, an editor perhaps.

The final result of the Dutch investigation was a critical 712-page edition of the diary containing the original version, Anne's edited copy, and the published version as well as the experts' findings. While some may argue that the Netherlands State Institute for War Documentation used an elephant to swat a fly, once again it becomes clear that the deniers glibly make claims that have no relationship to the most basic rules of truth and evidence.

All this evidence, and much else, demonstrates the nature of the deniers' claims. Much of this information was entered into the High Court of Justice in London as evidence when the author of this article was sued for libel by David Irving, a man who has written many books on World War Two, a number of which deny the Holocaust.

Irving sued for libel because he had been described as a Holocaust denier in one of the present author's books. He contended this was not true, because his claims about the Holocaust were correct. The judge in the case, Judge Gray, however, found Irving, who introduced virtually all of the standard denial arguments into his submission, to be indeed a Holocaust denier.

Dismissing Irving's claims that the gas chambers were an impossibility, the judge noted that that the 'cumulative effect of the documentary evidence for the genocidal operation of the gas chambers' was not only 'considerable' but 'mutually corroborative'.

Judge Gray, who found the eyewitness and documentary evidence to be 'striking[ly]... consistent', concluded that 'no objective, fair-minded historian would have serious cause to doubt' the existence of gas chambers at Auschwitz, which were used on a substantial scale to kill Jews. He found Irving's arguments - and by extension the claims of deniers in general - to be 'perverse and egregious'.

Furthermore, the judge said that Irving had 'significantly misrepresented what the evidence, objectively examined, reveals'. (For the complete judgement, the daily transcripts, and the expert witness reports see http://www.hdot.org - the link is given below.)

Holocaust denial is a form of virulent anti-Semitism. But it is not only that. It is also an attack on reasoned inquiry and inconvenient history. If this history can be denied any history can be denied.

Holocaust deniers have, thus far, been decidedly unsuccessful in convincing the broader public of their claims - although many people worry that after the last of the Holocaust survivors has died (most are now in their 80s) deniers will achieve greater success. However, historians, carefully relying on a broad array of documentary and material evidence, a small sample of which is mentioned in this article, can and already have demonstrated that Holocaust denial is a tissue of lies.

More here:

BBC - History - World Wars: Denying the Holocaust

World War II in Europe Ended 75 Years AgoBut the World Is Still Fighting Over Who Gets to Say What Happened – TIME

Posted By on May 8, 2020

At the end of March, the historian Jan Grabowski was set to have a busy few weeks. First came the release of what he describes as the most important of his 17 books, which features his research into the Polish policemen responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Polish Jews during the Holocaust. A week later, a hearing was set to take place in Warsaw in a lawsuit he filed against a nationalist organization aligned with Polands ruling Law and Justice Party, over its claim that he falsifies the history of Poland by doing that work.

That hearing has been postponed indefinitely because of the pandemic, but the issues it raises are not going away anytime soon. I have no doubts of course my detractors will strike sometime soon because thats what they do. Its a question of time, he tells TIME by phone while in lockdown in Warsaw. Whenever I write about something that speaks to the fact that segments of Polish society during the war were complicit with the Holocaust, I become an enemy of the people.

Europes physical battles of World War II ended 75 years ago with German surrender on May 7, 1945. But that doesnt mean the fighting is over: A wave of right-wing nationalist leaders, who have come to power in Europe in recent years, are waging a war of words over the past. While outright Holocaust denial remains an issue, says scholar Deborah Lipstadt, author of Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory, these days theres more rewriting the history, taking inconvenient details and reshaping them.

So, as historians like Grabowski, 58, try to tell the story of what happened all those decades ago, theyre facing resistance from officials who have their own reasons for wanting to tell the story a certain wayand, they say, the outcome could affect the lessons the world takes from World War II for generations to come.

On May 9, Russia will celebrate Victory Day, the countrys most important national holiday. As might be expected for a festival that marks the surrender of Nazi forces to the Soviet Union, official commemorations are mostly centered on the Soviet triumph in ending a war that killed over 8 million Soviet soldiers. In a few months will fall another significant World War II anniversaryone that fewer in Russia are keen to embrace. On Aug. 23, it will be 81 years since Adolf Hitlers Nazi Germany and Joseph Stalins Soviet Union inked the nonaggression treaty commonly known as the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, which helped usher in World War II.

The Foreign Minister of Germany, Joachim von Ribbentrop, Soviet Leader Iosif (Joseph) Stalin and Soviet foreign minister Vyacheslav Molotov (foreground L-R) pose for a photo at the singing ceremony of the German-Soviet Treaty of Nonaggression, Aug. 23, 1939, in Moscow

TASS via Getty Images

A week after the pact was signed, Hitler invaded western Poland. The Soviet Union followed two weeks later by invading eastern Poland. At least 3 million Jewish and 1.9 million non-Jewish Poles were killed during the Nazi reign of terror that followed; it is also estimated that, under wartime Soviet occupation, half a million Polish citizens died. And although the pact promised ten years of non-aggression between Germany and the Soviet Union, on June 22, 1941, Hitler launched a blitzkrieg attack on the USSR, calling for the capture of Moscow within four months. The subsequent fighting ultimately led to the deaths of an estimated 26 million people across the Soviet Union. After the wars end in 1945, the annexed region of Poland became part of the USSR until it gained independence in 1989.

By that point, the war had ushered in a new world order. The United States had emerged as the foremost economic superpower, and the United Nations was founded. Empires vanished, as European colonies in Asia, Africa and the Middle East fought for and won their independence. Europe was devastated. And the mythos of the war had already begun to take shape. The American narrative often simply left out the role of the nations Cold War enemies in the USSR, and the Soviet Union was involved in its own myth-making project. There, authorities denied the existence of a secret Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact protocol that made plans to divide territory in areas like Poland between Germany and the USSR. Russian officials have since said the Soviet incursion into Poland wasnt an invasion but an act of self-defense because Poland had blocked the formation of a coalition against Hitlers Germany before the war. Propaganda in films and literature glorified the war role. Censorship prevented a discussion about the trauma, so that the population would forget about the tragedy and move on, says Irina Scherbakova, a Russian historian and founding member of the human-rights organization Memorial.

These stories of World War IIstories of victory or victimhoodbecame the backbone for the new regimes that rose in its wake. In Eastern Europe, the legitimacy of the communist regimes that came to power after the Second World War was constructed around this narrative of only [the] Soviet Union can guarantee our safety from [the] German threat. says Jan T. Gross, an expert on post-war Soviet and East European politics and the Holocaust and professor emeritus at Princeton University. But underneath, there is a great disquiet.

In the 1960s, Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev made May 9 a national holiday and introduced grand military parades. In 1995, Boris Yeltsin, the first leader of post-Soviet Russia, made those military parades an annual tradition. The Victory Day parade has only expanded under Vladimir Putin, who has been Russias de facto leader since 2000. In recent years, it has typically featured thousands of military personnel marching alongside dozens of tanks and armored vehicles among hundreds of thousands of spectators.

A gala concert was held in Red Square to mark the 70th anniversary victory, May 9, 2015 in Moscow.

Handout/Host photo agency / RIA Novosti / Getty Images

This year, with 12 million Muscovites confined to their home in a lockdown against the coronavirus, Putin, after much resistance, decided to postpone the parade that was to commemorate Victory Days Diamond Jubilee. Moscows Red Square, the familiar brick expanse in Russias capital city, will be ghostly quiet on May 9 for the first time in over 25 years. But even without the parade, the power of the memory of victory is clear.

For proof, look to Putin himself. As he has made moves to extend his political power, he has likewise attempted to more assertively impose his version of the narrative of World War II. The government has weaponized the war through rhetoric, legislation, revising textbooks and cultural events as a means of shoring up public support for a regime that promotes a vision of Russia as a reborn global power, says Scherbakova.

Over the past few years, Putin has also cast the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and its secret protocolthe very existence of which was denied by most of his forebearsas a move the Soviet Union was forced into by Western leaders alleged collusion with Hitler at the time of the 1938 Munich agreement, under which Britain and France allowed Hitler to annex the Sudetenland in what was then Czechoslovakia. When the Soviet Union realised that it was left to face Hitlers Germany on its own, it acted to try to avoid a direct confrontation, and this resulted in signing the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, Putin said during a 2015 press conference with German Chancellor Angela Merkel. Last August, Russia put the original pact and its secret protocol on display at the State Archives in Moscow, alongside the 1938 agreement.

Taking particular aim at Russia, the European Parliament issued a resolution last September on the importance of European remembrance for the future of Europe, specifically urging Russia to come to terms with its tragic past. Calling the resolution sheer nonsense, Putin and his officials in December took to blaming Poland for the start of World War II. Speaking for an hour on the subject of the war during a Dec. 20 summit, he claimed that in 1938 Poland assumed the role of instigator and that Poland and Germany acted together. Putin brought up the subject of Polish responsibility no less than five times in a single week that month. In an unusual outburst at a meeting with the Defense Ministry on Dec. 24, he proclaimed that the Polish ambassador to Nazi Germany in the 1930s was scum and an anti-Semitic pig. That same day, the speaker of Russias parliament publicly called for Poland to apologize for starting the war. The Polish government, in response, accused Putin of reviving propaganda from the time of Stalinist totalitarianism.

Pawe Jaboski, Polands deputy foreign affairs minister, believes Russia focused on Poland because it is a vocal proponent of the sanctions imposed on Russia in response to its annexation of Crimea in March 2014. Russia is using historical memory, he argues, to try to create an image of blamelessness.

In that, Russia would not be alone. A monument erected in Budapest in 2014 under the nationalistic Fidesz party came under fire for depicting Hungary as the archangel Gabriel being attacked by Germany; critics say it whitewashes the fact that the wartime government was complicit in the murder of a large part of the countrys Jewish population. Lithuanias Museum of Occupations and Freedom Fights, located in the capital Vilnius, was in 2018 re-named from the Museum of Genocide Victims and focuses almost entirely on the murder of the Lithuanian non-Jewish population, while perpetrators of the Holocaust are lauded as victims in their countries struggle against Soviet occupation. The museum has been widely criticized in a country where Germans murdered about 90% of the Jewish populationone of the highest rates in Europe. The Holocaust disappears as the unique event it empirically was, says Dovid Katz, an American Yiddish historian based in Vilnius.

But Poland, Putins target, has also taken particularly forceful steps to introduce its own version of history. Historians say Polands ruling Law and Justice Party (PiS) has pursued a nationalistic revision of history since it came into office in 2015. The government wants to emphasize that Poles suffered under German occupation and most importantly they were not perpetrators or collaborators, says Svenja Bethke, a history lecturer at the U.K.s University of Leicester. Spokespeople for PiS and Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki did not respond to requests for comment for this article.

In February 2018, Polish President Andrzej Duda signed a bill into law making it illegal to accuse the Polish state or people of involvement or responsibility for crimes committed by Nazis during the war, citing the need protect Polands and the Polish peoples good nameeven though historians agree that, in a society that fostered widespread anti-Semitism, relatively few non-Jewish Poles tried to protect their Jewish neighbors from the Nazis. The law, commonly known as the Holocaust Law, meant that phrases like Polish death camp were banned from use by the media, as that wording may suggest a camp established and run by Poland.

Far-right protesters march in support of the law introducing a penalty for using the term 'Polish death or concentration camps' near the Presidential Palace in Warsaw on Feb. 5, 2018

NurPhoto via Getty ImagesMaciej Luczniewski/NurPhoto

Following international condemnation, the parliament amended the law in June 2018, replacing the original criminal penalty with a civil one. Since then, Poland has concentrated on a public relations strategy for getting its interpretation of history out there, such as through op-eds and statements by the Prime Minister. In November 2019, Netflix added text to its recent documentary The Devil Next Door that clarified that death camps in Poland were run by Nazi Germany after Morawiecki wrote a letter to Netflixs CEO. Better than punishing somebody for using the wrong language is to explain write about it, make movies about it and show people real facts, not punish them, Wojciech Surmacz, President of the state-run Polish Press Agency, tells TIME of the approach. Just show them the truth.

In the years after the invasion of Poland, Jan Grabowskis father had an experience that was all too familiar for Polands Jewish population. His neighbor, knowing the family was Jewish, went to the Gestapo to turn them in. But then something unusual happened: the officer who came to grill Grabowskis grandfather realized they had both served in the same unit in the Austro-Hungarian army during World War I. On the basis of that connection, he vowed not to tell his superiors about them.

By thus surviving the war, Grabowskis father became one of only 1% of Polish Jews to outlive the German occupation. And so, for the historian, getting to the truth about that timethe real truthis personal. Over the last 20 years, he has researched the countless times Poles informed Germans about local Jewish people, many instances of which are documented in German court records in Warsaw. Several members of my family were murdered during the war, he says. One of my grandfathers brothers was murdered one year after the war by Poles, who simply did not like very much to see a Jew returning to Poland.

Holocaust historian Jan Grabowski in his office in Ottawa in 2017.

Courtesy of Jan Grabowski

But, despite the personal nature of his work, Grabowski has stopped giving workshops for Polish teachers on the history of World War II and the Holocaust because, he says, teachers were afraid to attend sessions that might slander the good name of Poland or to be associated with someone targeted by nationalists. In addition to the lawsuit Grabowski filed against the Polish League Against Defamation, which is aligned with PiS, he is also embroiled in a suit filed by the same group on behalf of a woman who objects to a book that Grabowski co-edited, which describes her deceased uncle robbing a Jewish girl and allegedly helping Germans find Jews who were in hiding. The group accused him of being a carrier of lies in a June 2017 letter sent to the University of Ottawa, where he is a professor. More than 180 Holocaust scholars in the U.S. and worldwide issued a statement of support for Grabowski, denouncing the accusations as baseless and an attack on academic freedom and integrity.

Grabowskis work is part of a field that has flourished since the collapse of communism. For example, the 2000 book Neighbors: The Destruction of the Jewish Community in Jedwabne, Poland by Jan T. Gross, documented the slaughter of about 1,600 Jews by their Polish neighbors in 1941 in the village of Jedwabne, outside Warsaw. But, now that the fight over this history has ramped up, some experts worry that the field may start to shrink.

Jaboski, Polands deputy foreign affairs minister, tells TIME that academics are free and that if there are any attempts at rewriting history its done by those who try to portray the grey area as representing the whole story. But Dariusz Stola, a professor at the Institute of Political Studies of the Polish Academy of Sciences, says he fears Polands 2018 law has triggered an atmosphere of intimidation that discourages scholars, especially those of the younger generation from tackling difficult subjects related to crimes committed on 20th century Polish soil.

If future historians are discouraged from such study, the consequences could be grave, and not just within academia.

Memory is shaped by current events. The story of World War II, like any world-shaping event, is told by people in the present looking back to try to make sense of what they are going through now. The United States is certainly not immune from this phenomenon, as post-war attitudes obscured discussion of the countrys own WWII injustices, ranging from racial segregation in the armed forces to the incarceration of Japanese Americans. History is about the past, but you write it in the present, says Rob Citino, Senior Historian at the National WWII Museum in New Orleans. Memory is about the past, but youre living in the present, and the way you remember things is very much altered by what youre going through at the time. History is a technical field. Memoryeverybody has one.

A British sergeant is lifted up as Moscow women celebrate VE Day on May 8, 1945.

Getty Images

Likewise, memories of the past inform present-day policymaking. World War II provides what is perhaps the most famous example of this phenomenon: From the Vietnam War in the 60s to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, Western leaders have invoked Munich to warn of the danger of appeasing dictators. And in Russia, memories of World War II have been implicitly used in an attempt to legitimize the invasion of Ukraine and annexation of Crimea. Putin compared the Ukrainian militarys offensive in Donbas to the Nazi siege of Leningrad during World War II, and Russian officials compared the return of Crimea to Russia and victory in World War II as moments of which citizens could be proud.

There is some evidence that efforts to tweak those memories are working. Within Russia, the publics pride for the past appears to be reflected in the largely supportive response to Putins decision to annex Crimea. Just 3% are embarrassed by their countrys Soviet history and the 2014 capture of Crimea, according to a 2016 survey by Independent polling agency the Levada Center. Meanwhile, Stalinwhose labor camps, executions, forced famines and policy of collectivization led to the death of 20 million citizenshasnt been so popular in years. Levada found that, in 2003, 35% of respondents said they thought Stalin played a rather positive role Russias history; in 2019, the figure rose to 52%. Support for the Nazi-Soviet pact has also risen in the past decade. The center also found in a 2017 survey that 31% of respondents somewhat approved of the Nazi-Soviet pact, up from 26% in 2005. Central and Eastern Europe, however, remember the pact as something that doomed half of Europe to decades of misery.

So, if leaders in any one nation succeed in convincing the public to rely on a vision of the past based on nationalism, not historical research, they will have done much more than rewrite textbooks. As they fill their arsenals with friendly analogies, they remove the possibility of learning from what really happened.

Yet not everyone is prepared to accept a state-led account of the pastand if victorious historical narratives have aimed to unite the population in Russia, they have largely failed. The current model of national historical experience splits people up instead of bringing them together, Andrei Kolesnikov, Chair of the Russian Domestic Politics and Political Institutions Program at the Carnegie Moscow Center, has written.

In fact, Olga Malinova, a politics professor at Moscows Higher School of Economics, says a new trend of historical debate in Russia is emerging. People in social networks are having serious debates about how Victory Day should be commemorated, whether it should be commemorated at all, she says.

And there and elsewhere, despite everything, scholarship continues to be produced. Nobody gives a damn about the risks, says Princetons Gross. Over the last 20 years, there have been piles of books in Polish where these matters are very well-documented. Last fall, Polish prosecutors dropped a roughly four-year-old case over the fact that Gross wrote that the Poles killed more Jews than they did Germans in a 2015 op-ed. And a review of Jan Grabowskis latest book, On Duty: The Role of Polish Police in the Holocaust in a prominent local newspaper praised it for reminding readers how much there is still to learn about the extermination of Europes Jewish population. They and their colleagues plan to keep doing the work, so that others can learnperhaps prompting more of the type of conversations that make a top-down rewriting of history so difficult. Seventy-five years later, there is still much work to be done in learning about that past.

When you do the history of the Holocaust, its a commitment, Grabowski says. I have an obligation to the dead.

Thank you! For your security, we've sent a confirmation email to the address you entered. Click the link to confirm your subscription and begin receiving our newsletters. If you don't get the confirmation within 10 minutes, please check your spam folder.

Write to Olivia B. Waxman at olivia.waxman@time.com.

More here:

World War II in Europe Ended 75 Years AgoBut the World Is Still Fighting Over Who Gets to Say What Happened - TIME

The long silence of the Auschwitz cellist – FRANCE 24

Posted By on May 8, 2020

Berlin (AFP)

One of the last living members of the women's orchestra at Auschwitz, Anita Lasker-Wallfisch, is at 95 among the most prominent survivors raising her voice against hate.

But for four decades she kept her silence.

Even her two children were long kept in the dark about what their steely, stoic mother suffered at the Nazi death camp in today's Poland and at Bergen-Belsen, where she was liberated 75 years ago.

Born in 1925 into a Jewish family in what was then the German town of Breslau, today Wroclaw in Poland, Anita was sent to Auschwitz in 1943 while still a teenager. Her sister Renate was deported on a separate train.

Already an accomplished cellist, she was able to join the camp's orchestra for women and girls -- a fact she says likely saved her life.

The musicians were forced to play marches for slave labourers on their way to and from work each day, and for the SS guards.

But the scars left by those years were long her closely guarded secret.

"I didn't want to overwhelm my children with my terrible past, I wanted to leave it behind," she told AFP by telephone from London in an antiquated German, having spoken only English to her children.

- 'Hung in the air' -

That toxic silence in the intervening decades passed the trauma down to a second generation also scarred by their parents' suffering and loss, her daughter said.

Maya Jacobs-Wallfisch is now a psychotherapist specialising in transgenerational trauma.

For years, there were no words for Anita to tell her daughter and son, the cellist Raphael Wallfisch, how their grandparents were murdered in April 1942, or how Aunt Renate returned from the camps "a skeleton with gaping wounds on her legs".

Nor could she find a way to explain how she, reduced to the camp registration number 69388, played her instrument "a few metres from the crematorium, with an awful view of the selection ramp" for labour or the gas chambers.

The pain she carried with her "hung in the air", Anita said, but she never spoke about it -- not even with her husband, pianist Peter Wallfisch.

"We had other things to do, we had to begin our life again from zero," she said.

- 'Locked-up' trauma -

Lasker-Wallfisch struggled with the burden of her memories but her children were not fooled. Maya said she knew all along that her mother guarded a dark, corrosive secret.

She grew up with "strange parents" who spoke German among themselves, a language their children didn't understand, while hating everything that came from Germany.

Friends asked Maya why her mother had a "telephone number" tattooed on her lower arm. One day, rummaging through a drawer, she found shocking photos from Bergen-Belsen, where her mother and aunt were transferred in March 1944.

Secrets and silence "are never healthy", Maya, 62, said. "I absorbed everything but of course without knowing what 'everything' was."

"Trauma doesn't go away, it is locked up... For some people, it is the only strategy to stay sane," she said. "But the wounds of the past are deep and may come to haunt the next generation."

Lasker-Wallfisch says she owes her life to music. It is also what led her back to Germany for the first time in more than 40 years, when she began to speak out about her experiences.

- '2,000-year-old virus' -

"I never wanted to return to Germany," she said.

But "my curiosity to see Bergen-Belsen was too great", she added.

In July 1989 she visited the camp where more than 50,000 people including Anne Frank lost their lives, to attend a concert of the English Chamber Orchestra she co-founded.

She also returned to her birthplace in Wroclaw, and to Auschwitz-Birkenau.

Seeing the camp "empty, without a single person, was... unreal".

Since then Lasker-Wallfisch has repeatedly denounced discrimination and the resurgence of extremism. Until the virus outbreak, she was a fixture on television and at schools across Germany.

In January 2018, on the occasion of Holocaust Remembrance Day, she delivered a fiery speech to the Bundestag lower house of parliament.

She was the first survivor to address the chamber since more than 90 members of the far-right Alternative for Germany party won seats there the previous autumn.

In an unwavering voice, she told the deputies that hatred of Jews and Holocaust denial were staging a dangerous comeback.

"Anti-Semitism is a 2,000-year-old virus that is apparently incurable," she said.

"Hatred is simply a poison and in the end you poison yourself."

2020 AFP

Read the original post:

The long silence of the Auschwitz cellist - FRANCE 24


Page 1,108«..1020..1,1071,1081,1091,110..1,1201,130..»

matomo tracker