Page 1,115«..1020..1,1141,1151,1161,117..1,1201,130..»

New Report Shows Online Payment Processors Still Have a Hate Group Problem – Right Wing Watch

Posted By on May 2, 2020

A new report shows that online payment processors and merchants, including Stripe, Amazon, and DonorBox, continue to facilitate the financial solvency of racist hate groups in a time where extremism-related crimes have spiked.

In areport published Monday, Center for Media and Democracy investigative reporter Alex Kotch found that at least 24 white nationalist, neo-Nazi, and neo-Confederate groups use one or more online fundraising services. Kotch used Southern Poverty Law Centers 2019 list of hate groups as a reference. Even as some payment facilitators have attempted to revoke thesegroups ability to fundraise, determined groups have found ways to get around bans.

In some cases, these groups have slipped through the cracks of company policies; in others, the policies are not strict enough to ban certain white nationalist groups, Kotch writes.

Right Wing Watch and ThinkProgressco-published a reportin August 2018 that found that many of the countrys best known white supremacist groups were still bringing in revenue through the use of severalof the largest online payment processors a full year after those companies had promised to combat hate on their platforms. That promise camein wake of the violent Unite the Right white supremacist gathering in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017, which resulted inthe murder of an anti-hate activist. Stripe, oneofthe most-used processors by extremists, was notified of the problem by anti-hate activists last spring, butthe company chose inaction.

CMDs report makes clear that the problem continues to persist at an alarming scale. In one particularly shocking example from the report, founderPhilip Lester of GiveForms,a paid nonprofit fundraising tool,was asked about his companys handling of payments for the white nationalist hate groupAmerican Freedom Party. After a conversation with the groups web administrator, Lester reportedly determined that there was no empirical evidence of racism, hatred or bigotry being promoted by AFP, an organization founded by neo-Nazi skinheads and whose leadersengage with anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial.

The number of hate groups continues to increase in the United States, and horrific acts of violence have spun out of white nationalist ideology in the last few years. As the United Statesturns toward 2020 and anelection that many extremists view as make-or-break for their movement, it is unclear when, if ever, payment processors will stand up against hate the way many promised they would in 2017.

See the original post:

New Report Shows Online Payment Processors Still Have a Hate Group Problem - Right Wing Watch

A Ukrainian priest who saved Jews during the Holocaust has never been honored by Yad Vashem. New research could change that. – JTA News

Posted By on May 2, 2020

(JTA) Pope Pius XII, the leader of the Catholic church through the World War II years, does not have a great reputation in the Jewish community.

Although he hid some Jews in churches during the Holocaust, a large body of historical evidence, including some researched by John Cornwell, points to the fact that Pius helped Hitler to power and trivialized the Holocaust, despite having reliable knowledge of its true extent. Cornwall wrote a 1999 book titled Hitlers Pope, and the nickname has since stuck.

Pius archives in the Vatican were opened briefly last month, just before the coronavirus outbreak became a serious pandemic. As detailed in a Religious News Service report this week, German researchers have found more evidence that Pius was very aware of the genocide of Jews and took little to no action against it.

But the archives also shed new light on a lesser-known but crucial figure in the story: Andrey Sheptytsky, who led Ukraines Greek Catholic Church at the time.

Some have long called for Sheptytsky to be made a Righteous Among the Nations, Israels title for non-Jews who risked their lives to save Jews from the Holocaust. But Yad Vashem, Israels Holocaust memorial, has resisted doing so. The new information about Sheptytsky offers his supporters a new chance to have his historical record honored.

The background

Sheptytsky and his brother, Klymentiy, who has been recognized as a Righteous, harbored more than 100 Jews in monasteries and organized groups that helped them go into hiding, according to multiple historians, including Yale historian Timothy Snyder. Andrey Sheptytsky also publicly protested the murder of Jews and denounced his own congregants for participating in the violence.

Born to a noble Polish family in Ukraine in 1865, Andrey Sheptytsky joined the clergy despite his fathers opposition. Klymentiy, who was four years younger than Andrey, followed in his older brothers footsteps. Andrey spoke Hebrew fluently and was a regular donor to Jewish causes in the Lviv area, where he lived.

Pope Pius XII, circa 1940. (ullstein bild via Getty Images)

But Andrey Sheptytsky also welcomed the German invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941 and sent chaplains to accompany the Ukrainian soldiers who fought with the Nazis, as part of the Galizien Waffen-SS Division.

A determined objector to the anti-religious Soviet Union which was an enemy of Germany when the Nazis invaded Ukraine Sheptytsky saw the Germans briefly as liberators, Snyder wrote in a 2009 defense of Sheptytsky.

These lamentable choices, as Snyder called them, have stood in the way of recognition for Sheptytsky and his Catholic beatification, which is also being blocked because of resistance by Polish clergymen albeit for reasons connected to the complicated history between the two nations.

Yad Vashem has rejected at least a dozen requests to recognize Sheptytsky since the 1960s, even though the museum has in the past honored Nazi activists and loyalists, including Oskar Schindler and Hans Calmeyer.

The Anti-Defamation League honored Sheptytsky with the Jan Karski Courage to Care Award in 2013.

The new evidence

In the Vatican archives, University of Munster researchers discovered that Sheptytsky wrote the pope a letter that spoke of 200,000 Jews massacred in Ukraine under the outright diabolical German occupation.

Writing such a letter, whose full contents have not been published yet, constituted a capital crime under the Nazi occupation, and may therefore be seen as new evidence the Sheptytsky risked his life to save Jews.

It could also have a big impact on whether to reopen Yad Vashems review of the case, said Berel Rodal, a founder of Ukrainian Jewish Encounter, which promotes dialogue between Jews and non-Jewish Ukrainians.

A staffer under Pius XII at the Vaticans Secretariat of State, Angelo DellAcqua, who later became a cardinal, warned in a memo at the time not to believe a Jewish Agency report about the Holocaust because Jews easily exaggerate. He also dismissed the Sheptytsky account by saying that Orientals are really not an example of honesty, the German research revealed.

On Sheptytsky, Yad Vashem has for too long resisted pressure, including by Snyder and a chief rabbi of Ukraine, Rodal said.

Pressure isnt going to work. Whats necessary is for Yad Vashem to receive new material so they can reverse their decision without appearing inconsistent. This letter could be it, Rodal said.

Experts are monitoring the news coming out from the Vatican, aYad Vashem spokesperson said.

We hope that once the health crisis is over, we will be able to resume regular work and examine these documents first hand, the spokesperson said. At that time historians will have a better understanding of all their implications.

Link:
A Ukrainian priest who saved Jews during the Holocaust has never been honored by Yad Vashem. New research could change that. - JTA News

Wilmington Trust’s Sharon L. Klein Named to 2020 Forbes/SHOOK List of Top Women Wealth Advisors – Olean Times Herald

Posted By on May 2, 2020

NEW YORK, May 1, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- Wilmington Trust today announced that Sharon L. Klein, President, Family Wealth, Eastern U.S. Region, has been named as one of the top 200 advisors in the country on the Forbes Top Women Wealth Advisors list. This annual list recognizes the top 1,000 women advisors in the United States. Less than one-in-five of these top women advisors oversee $1 billion or more in client assets, and Klein is featured as one of them.

The ranking is a merit-based designation developed by SHOOK Research for advisors with at least seven years of experience. It is based on both qualitative and quantitative data from nominations and in-person interviews. The data is evaluated by an algorithm and considers factors such as revenue trends, assets under management, client experience and industry experience. Forbes received 32,000 nominations this year.

This follows Klein's earlier recognition to the Forbes Best-In-State Wealth Advisors2020list, an annual designation that recognizes the top advisors in the United States. Klein is featured on the list of the top high net worth wealth advisors in New York City.

"Sharon's ranking on these prestigious lists reaffirms the high-quality of wealth services and the professionalism she brings to her clients every day," said Bill LaFond, Head of Family Wealth Wilmington Trust. "With over 25 years in the wealth management arena, Sharon continues to demonstrate an outstanding commitment to her work, and it's gratifying to see her honored by Forbes on multiple occasions."

Klein is responsible for coordinating the delivery of all Wealth Management services, leading teams of professionals across the areas of planning, trust, investment management, family office, and private banking, to high-net-worth clients in the Eastern United States. She also heads Wilmington Trust's National Divorce Advisory Practice.

A noted expert on family wealth issues, Klein has addressed a number of professional organizations, including the Heckerling Institute on Estate Planning, the New York University Institute on Federal Taxation, the Notre Dame Estate Planning Institute, the Duke University Estate Planning Conference, and the Bloomberg BNA Tax Management Advisory Board.

She is a Fellow of the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel and a member of New York Bankers Association Trust & Investment Division Executive Committee, The Rockefeller University Committee on Trust and Estate Gift Plans, the Professional Advisory Council of the Anti-Defamation League, the Estates, Gifts and Trusts Advisory Board for The Bureau of National Affairs, and the Thomson Reuters Trusts & Estates Advisory Board. Klein is Chair of the Domestic Relations Committee of Trusts & Estates magazine, where she sits on the Board. She is on the Board of Directors of the American Brain Foundation, and a member of its Finance Committee. Klein was also recently named as an Accredited Estate Planner by the National Association of Estate Planners and Councils.

For more information about this designation, please visit Forbes.com.

ABOUT WILMINGTON TRUSTWilmington Trust is a registered service mark, used in connection with various fiduciary and non-fiduciary services, including trustee, custodial, agency, investment management, and other services, offered to trust, individual, and institutional clients by certain subsidiaries and affiliates of Wilmington Trust Corporation. Such subsidiaries and affiliates include, but are not limited to, Manufacturers & Traders Trust Company (M&T Bank), Wilmington Trust Company (operating in Delaware only), Wilmington Trust, N.A., Wilmington Trust Investment Advisors, Inc., Wilmington Funds Management Corporation, and Wilmington Trust Investment Management, LLC. Wilmington Trust Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of M&T Bank Corporation. International corporate and institutional services are offered through Wilmington Trust Corporation's international affiliates. Loans, credit cards, retail and business deposits, and other business and personal banking services and products are offered by M&T Bank, member FDIC.

This material is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the sale of any financial product or service.

Media Contact:

Maya DillonDirector of Corporate Communicationsphone: (212) 415-0557

ABOUT WILMINGTON TRUSTWilmington Trust is a registered service mark, used in connection with various fiduciary and non-fiduciary services, including trustee, custodial, agency, investment management, and other services, offered to trust, individual, and institutional clients by certain subsidiaries and affiliates of Wilmington Trust Corporation. Such subsidiaries and affiliates include, but are not limited to, Manufacturers & Traders Trust Company (M&T Bank), Wilmington Trust Company (operating in Delaware only), Wilmington Trust, N.A., Wilmington Trust Investment Advisors, Inc., Wilmington Funds Management Corporation, and Wilmington Trust Investment Management, LLC. Wilmington Trust Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of M&T Bank Corporation. International corporate and institutional services are offered through Wilmington Trust Corporation's international affiliates. Loans, credit cards, retail and business deposits, and other business and personal banking services and products are offered by M&T Bank, member FDIC.

This material is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the sale of any financial product or service.

Original post:
Wilmington Trust's Sharon L. Klein Named to 2020 Forbes/SHOOK List of Top Women Wealth Advisors - Olean Times Herald

COVID-19 and America’s Counter-Terrorism Response – War on the Rocks

Posted By on May 2, 2020

Ever since the Sept. 11 attacks, U.S. foreign policy and national security have been swallowed whole by counter-terrorism considerations, even as a number of counter-terrorism experts have cautioned against overemphasizing the terrorist threat.

If anything could ever shake the United States out of its counter-terrorism fixation it would be a crisis of even greater magnitude than 9/11. It seemed like that moment finally came with the COVID-19 pandemic, as the death toll in New York alone has been greater than the 9/11 attacks.

Yet what we have seen so far is the opposite. Instead of reorienting toward other paradigms and reexamining its strategic priorities, the United States continues to reflexively overextend its counter-terrorism tools to deal with some of the more problematic aspects of the virus spread.

The Department of Justice under Attorney General William Barr released a memo on March 24 advising that, because coronavirus appears to meet the statutory definition of a biological agent under 18 U.S.C. 178(1), such acts potentially could implicate the nations terrorism-related statute [including] 2332a (use of a weapon involving a biological agent).

In other words, the United States is expanding the definition of terrorism to encompass the intentional spread of the new coronavirus, and the Department of Justice memo outlines how federal terrorism charges could be brought against individuals who have threatened to spread the virus deliberately.

The COVID-19 pandemic, like many crises and emergencies in the past, has been exploited by extremist actors. The question is how to respond without confounding the definition of terrorism. No doubt this advice from the department was released in response to disturbing evidence emerging of the way right-wing extremist groups in particular are attempting to exploit this crisis to promote accelerationist fringe theories.

Even a cursory scroll through neo-Nazi forums and white supremacist Telegram channels shows how right-wing extremists are pushing disinformation and conspiracy theories to stoke extremist narratives and encourage mobilization.

In the United States, right-wing extremism has accounted for 70 percent of extremist-related killings in the past 10 years; in 2018, right-wing extremists killed more people than in 1995, which was the year of the Oklahoma City bombing.

The COVID-19 pandemic is affording right-wing violent extremists more opportunities to radicalize and mobilize. Federal Protective Services within the Department of Homeland Security highlighted in a leaked memo that white supremacists and neo-Nazis are advocating the obligation of infected members to spread the virus to law enforcement and minority communities. Civil society groups, like the Anti-Defamation League, that are tracking right-wing extremism have identified memes on right-wing forums like What to Do if You Get Corona 19, that say, visit your local mosque, visit your local synagogue, spend the day on public transport, spend time in your local diverse neighborhood.

The risk is not just limited to an increase in hateful rhetoric and conspiracy theories but is leading to actual attacks and plots. On March 24, FBI agents killed known right-wing extremist Timothy Wilson in a shootout during a sting operation. FBI agents honed in on at this time because Wilson was planning to use a car bomb to blow up a hospital treating a number of COVID-19 patients. It was also recently reported that the leading member of the U.S. coronavirus task force, Dr. Anthony Fauci, has needed extra security because of a number of credible threats against his safety. On neo-Nazi Telegram channels, extremists have urged followers to target essential businesses that serve minority communities, like grocery stores, with homemade chemical weapons.

The most recent attempted attack was by John Michael Rathbun, who was charged with attempting to target a Jewish assisted living facility in Longmeadow, Massachusetts, with an explosive device, after it was alleged that he posted on multiple online white supremacist forums that it was Jew killing day.

Governments must account for a potential uptick in extremism in their emergency management planning and responses during crises. Law enforcement must also use federal statutes at their disposal to prosecute and deter violent extremism and terrorism. But the way the Department of Justices prosecutorial advice is being taken is an overextension of counter-terrorism legislation and definitions. Instead of being used to prosecute COVID-19-related violence or threats committed on behalf of political or ideological causes, it is being used to address more common law-and-order issues during this pandemic.

Since Barr issued the guidance, two people have been charged with terrorism offenses related to COVID-19, so the guidance has not been widely applied yet. However, in the two instances where bioterrorism charges have been made, neither individual had known links to terrorist groups or extremist ideologies, nor were they deliberately spreading the virus to promote accelerationism, target minority groups, or take down the government.

One man in Florida, James Jamal Curry, was charged with a federal terrorism offense perpetrating a biological weapons hoax and violating 18 U.S.C. 1038(a)(l) for claiming he had the coronavirus and spitting on a police officer who responded to a domestic violence incident.

In Texas, Christopher Charles Perez was also charged with violating 18 U.S.C. 1038, which criminalizes hoaxes related to weapons of mass destruction, for writing a Facebook post that claimed he paid someone to spread the coronavirus at grocery stores to deter people from visiting them. (He purportedly sought to scare people from going out in public, to prevent the virus broader dissemination through community transmission.)

Clearly, neither of these two individuals actions fall within the scope of weaponizing the virus to commit targeted violence for political purposes. The complaints have not outlined any evidence that Currys or Perezs threats to spread COVID-19 were committed on behalf of political or ideological causes.

Instead their offenses fall within the frame of terroristic offenses. Despite the similarity in nomenclature, there is a big difference between a terrorism offense and a terroristic offense. A terroristic offense is one where someone causes imminent fear of harm to an individual or the public at large. It is a fairly common criminal charge that often goes along with assault or threat of assault charges, or making other threats or hoaxes that cause a response by public authorities.

State and local authorities have already charged at least five individuals with terroristic offenses for intentionally spreading the virus or threatening to spread the virus. One man was charged with making a terror threat after he coughed in a grocery store clerks face and claimed he had the coronavirus. Another woman was charged with terroristic offenses for doing the same in a store in Pennsylvania. A Missouri man was arrested and charged with second-degree terror offenses for licking a row of deodorants in a local Walmart.

Most recently, a Texas teenager is now wanted by police and will be charged with making a terrorist threat as distinct from being charged under federal terrorism statutes for a string of videos she posted on social media threatening that she has the coronavirus and is intentionally spreading it around.

All of these individuals are likely either mentally disturbed, idiotic pranksters, or drunk and disorderly and with no known links to terrorist groups or political motivations behind their actions. It makes sense to charge them with the lesser terroristic offense.

Both Texas and Florida have terroristic offenses within their statutes, and the cases of Perez and Curry could, and arguably should, have been charged under them, not under federal terrorism statutes. The recent memo from the Department of Justice, however, means that states now have the option, and guidance, to use federal terrorism statutes instead of charging for terroristic offenses, assault, or disturbing the peace under state laws.

To charge individuals under federal terrorism statutes for threatening to spread the virus, if the government does not also prove that they did so on behalf of a terrorist cause or group, is a troubling expansion of our normative understanding of terrorism. It is also an example of the reflexive manner in which the United States continues to deal with every emergency through the counter-terrorism prism while at the same time not addressing the clear and present threat of domestic terrorism from far-right extremist actors.

It also raises the question: How can you equate a cough or a sneeze, even the threat of one to spread disease, with a manipulated biological agent? As former U.S. attorney Harry Litman has pointed out: Until now, the core concept of a biological agent in terrorism law is an engineered or synthesized toxin, like anthrax. Shifting that definition to a naturally occurring virus we all can catch and carry, and one we so far know so little about, is not just inapt, its overkill. Nevertheless, the complaint filed in U.S. District Court in Florida against Curry claimed that the COVID-19 virus satisfies the biological agent definition in Title 18 of United States Code because it is a virus capable of causing death.

The courts have checked federal prosecutors in previous terrorism cases when they have overextended statutes, such as the case of Carol Anne Bond v. the United States of America. In this case, Bond was charged under federal statutes put in place to implement the Chemical Weapons Convention because she used chemical agents in a domestic dispute between spouses. The Supreme Court found that the convention was not meant to cover local activities and that Bonds actions fell within the state criminal jurisdiction and therefore state laws were sufficient to prosecute an assault. The same argument could be made here that state laws are sufficient to prosecute individuals who have threatened assaults via the virus without any clear political or ideological agendas.

There is little precedent to make the case that the spread of a virus already in the human body is the same as the transfer of a harmful biological agent using an intentional vector or an engineered toxin. There will likely be difficulties in successfully prosecuting these charges in federal court. So expanding the definition of terrorism to deal with violations of government orders, absent a clear link to extremist groups or political motivation, makes little sense and has further problematic long-term implications.

It risks distorting our understanding of terrorism in unproductive ways. The definition of terrorism has been debated for decades and is inconsistent across jurisdictions. But a general principle has applied: Terrorism is an act or threat of violence in pursuit of political or ideological aims.

The FBIs own published definition states that international terrorism is violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups who are inspired by, or associated with, designated foreign terrorist organizations or nations (state-sponsored), and domestic terrorism is the same violent or criminal act committed to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature. The U.S.Code of Federal Regulations defines terrorism as the unlawful use of force and violence in furtherance of political or social objectives.

This is not to say that definitions cannot be changed or expanded. After 9/11, the USA Patriot Act expanded the definition of terrorism to include domestic terrorism as well as international terrorism and defined it as action that is dangerous to human life, that is a violation of state or federal criminal laws, and when the act is intended to (i) intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination or kidnapping.

Yet the individuals who have been recently charged with federal terrorism offenses for intentionally spreading or threatening to spread the coronavirus as a weapon of a biological agent had no political or ideological aims. Nor were they seeking to influence the government. Nevertheless, the recent Department of Justice guidance equates transmission of the disease to a terrorist attack via chemical or biological agent and makes no mention of linking the intentional spread to broader political or ideological aims.

Health and security experts have been warning about a global pandemic for years, and there have been numerous tabletop exercises conducted on the transnational spread of flu-like viruses. The Department of Homeland Security and state and local governments have taken an all-hazards approach to disaster management to account for other emergencies besides a major terrorist attack and they should have thought through how to deal with criminal aspects of other types of emergencies like natural disasters and pandemics. Yet we have not been able to wrest ourselves out of the constraints of the counter-terrorism paradigm, and the Department of Justices advice reflects this reflexive thinking.

Its especially confusing when there are individuals who arguably should have been charged with terrorism, like Rathbun, who was alleged to have been motivated by white supremacist ideology in his attack against the care facility. But because such acts of targeted violence dont fall under U.S. federal terrorism statutes, Rathbun was charged with arson instead. Even though the Patriot Act expanded the definition of terrorism to include domestic terrorism, there are no domestic terrorism statutes per se or designated domestic terrorist organizations, and therefore his actions cannot be labeled or charged as domestic terrorism in court. Many counter-terrorism experts have argued that the lack of domestic terrorism statutes has hampered our ability to address the expansion of far-right violent extremism. If there is to be an expansion of Americas 9/11 counter-terrorism framework, it should be here.

As Bruce Hoffman and Jacob Ware have written, there are numerous challenges to addressing domestic far-right extremism, making it more politically expedient to focus on tackling still-present foreign jihadist threats. However, the United States is likely to face more, not less, violence and extremism from domestic far-right actors, particularly as they are seeking to exploit times of crises to accelerate the collapse of society or a coming race war.

Also true is the fact that terrorism definitions and statutes have changed and shifted over the years to address emerging threats. However, the new legal guidance addressing those threats has the potential to expand the definition of terrorism beyond what should be acceptable while also not addressing what needs addressing in the United States, which is the need for carefully constructed domestic terrorism laws to combat the expansion of right-wing extremism and violence while also protecting basic First Amendment rights.

Instead of continuing to squeeze the United States pandemic response through the narrow backdoor of the counter-terrorism edifice it has steadily built since 9/11, this crisis should help dismantle some of its excess and revise it to meet emerging terrorism threats and challenges. By treating common criminal threats and assaults absent political motivation as terrorism and not charging domestic extremists with domestic terrorism because there are no statutes, it is confusing and blurring our normative understanding of terrorism while leaving unaddressed the real threat of right-wing domestic terrorism.

Lydia Khalil is a research fellow at the Lowy Institute and a research associate at the Alfred Deakin Institute, Deakin University and the Centre for Resilient and Inclusive Societies.

Image: U.S. Navy (Photo by Ensign Alexander Perrien)

Here is the original post:
COVID-19 and America's Counter-Terrorism Response - War on the Rocks

A Seat at the Table: Jewish Chefs, Writers Share Recipes, Stories, History of Ashkenazi Cooking – NBC Bay Area

Posted By on May 1, 2020

Since Russ & Daughters opened in Manhattan in 1914, the family-run store has weathered the Spanish flu, two world wars, recessions and the Great Depression. With the new coronavirus pandemic sweeping the country, the current generation, Niki Russ Federman and Josh Russ Tupper, is doing what the family has always done: deliver bagels and cream cheese, lox and herring to people craving the emotional sustenance that the traditional Jewish favorites bring.

At Katzs Delicatessen, Jake Dell begins his mornings making matzoh balls to keep up with the spike in orders for matzoh ball soup as his customers seek comfort in uncertain times. The deli whose slogan became Send a Salami to Your Boy in the Army during World War II is now delivering matzoh ball soup to seniors, low-income residents and New York City health care workers.

Theres something very reassuring about it, something very normal about it, Dell said.

The owners of the two Lower East Side landmark institutions are among the chefs and scholars, historians and cookbook authors who are featured in the newest online course to be offered by YIVO Institute for Jewish Research. A Seat at the Table: A Journey into Jewish Food will be launched on May 1 and because of the coronavirus pandemic it will be free.

Two years in the making, the course provides a history of Ashkenazi food, or the cuisine of Eastern Europe, looking at it from its origin in religion and texts to its spread through diasporas around the world. The lectures use food as a way to teach history, with one on borscht, for example, exploring how borders and concepts of national identity change, and others looking at differences among traditions of the Ashkenazi, the Sephardic Jews of Spain and Portugal and the Mizrahi Jews of the Middle East and Central Asia.

Darra Goldstein, a retired Russian professor who taught at Williams College and a cookbook author, leads the course with more than 20 chefs, writers, culinary historians and others. There are cooking demonstrations by Liz Alpern and Jeffrey Yoskowitz of The Gefilteria in New York City, virtual visits to Russ & Daughters and Katzs Delicatessen and short video lectures by Ilan Stavans, the Mexican-American essayist who writes on American, Hispanic and Jewish cultures. Michael Twitty, known for exploring the legacy of Africa in American Southern cooking and his blending together of kosher and soul food, is also among those participating.

Goldstein conceived of different mini-lectures and thought of who should present them. She talks about cookbooks as social documents, rich in what they can say about how society changes, and about how corporations advertised products to Jewish households. Objects from the YIVO archives help to tell the story: packaging for Streits kosher chow mein from the 1950s, a pushcart permit issued to Israel Bloom of New York Citys Delancey Street in 1923, and a photograph of women and children in Bialystok, Poland, in 1932, carrying pots for cholent, a slow-cooked stew that conforms with a prohibition against work on the Sabbath.

The roots of Ashkenazi cooking lie in if not quite poverty, then certainly not in abundance for most people, she said. Obviously there were wealthy people who could eat more lavishly, but its a lot of very basic foods that would be prepared by putting more than one ingredient together, so that what you end up with is a really delicious dish that is more than the sum of its parts. And so I think that thats something that we can learn to do in our quarantine times.

Goldstein herself had gotten black radishes from a friend, was planning to grate them and combine them with onions, salt, and schmaltz or rendered chicken fat, and then refrigerate the mixture for four or five days. The result is a spread, one that her father really loved and would put on black bread, she said.

I think its about trying to find a way to make something really special out of what might be very basic, she said.

A Seat at the Table is made up of seven units, which will come out in installments once a week and which include about 100 videos. As of last week, about 1,000 people had registered for the course and more than 2,000 for all of YIVOs online classes, which have been free since mid-March.The food course was to have cost $55 for YIVO members and $60 for non-members.

One idea is to reclaim the cuisine from a stereotype of heavy, heartburn-inducing meals, said Ben Kaplan, YIVO's director of education. Whats been lost is its original character, its roots in fresh vegetables and fruits tied to the land of Eastern Europe, he said.

It actually can be eaten in a way thats healthy, it can be eaten in a way that connects people to local farms, he said.

That is what motivated Liz Alpern and Jeffrey Yoskowitz to open The Gefilteria. They shared a passion for Ashkenazi food even as it was dismissed as bland, boring and flavorless, Alpern said.

We took gefilte fish out of the jar, she said, because for them nothing better symbolized how bad things had gotten. They turned their attention to making a high-quality version before moving on to all the other foods of the Ashkenazi canon pickles, chicken soup, borscht and handmade matzoh, she said.

A lot of Jewish food was victim to mid-century industrialization and they set out to make it relevant and hip and sexy, Yoskowitz said, with fresh flavors and local and thoughtfully sourced ingredients. They traveled to Eastern Europe, read old memoirs and cookbooks, saw the resourcefulness that had been such an element of Jewish cooking before it was lost to the abundance in America and explored fermented vegetables, sour pickles and sauerkraut brine that is probiotic, he said.

That was a huge part of the wisdom of Jewish life, preserving food from times of abundance to times of scarcity and not just preserving them but actually improving their nutritional quality," Yoskowitz said.

Russ & Daughters has seen a surge in orders from people stocking up not only for themselves but also sending care packages across the country of bagels and lox and babkas and latkes, said Niki Russ Federman.

"All the things that we bake and are known for are stand-ins for people to be able to say, 'I cant be with you right now but Im sending you love,'" she said.

Like Katz's Delicatessen, the store is also delivering to the community, to hospitals, nursing homes, churches and community centers.

"So every week, we're feeding a couple of thousand people on the front lines," she said.

Kaplan said the course does not shy away from poverty or how people ate in the displaced persons camps after World War II.

You see how resilient and resourceful and creative people can be and those to me feel like very relevant themes for this time, he said.

Read the original here:

A Seat at the Table: Jewish Chefs, Writers Share Recipes, Stories, History of Ashkenazi Cooking - NBC Bay Area

Ashkenazi: This is hard for us, for me, the coalition comes with a price – The Jerusalem Post

Posted By on May 1, 2020

MK Gabi Ashkenzai was interviewed on Saturday by Channel 12, regarding the coalition talks leading up to the establishment of the government.

"We wanted to replace the government, but the political results didn't allow for anyone to establish a government," he said. "I am convinced that most of the public wants a unity government. Fourth elections are unthinkable. This thing isn't easy us for us, it's hasn't bfor me, but the coalition comes with a price."

"I understand the disappointment of the public, I understand the break. The Blue and White project was amazing, and it wasn't us who broke it down. We are making the right choice, we compromised. We won't fill all of the positions," he added.

When he was faced with the criticism concerning the size of the future government, he said, "The end of the government will be smaller." He added that there were 30 offices in the government, "of which we'll add one more, and even that one we'll eventually take down. We won't fill of the ministerial positions, it's not coincidental that there's a reduction paragraph in the agreement, but I'll accept the criticism."

He added that he was previously a soldier in the Golani Brigade and doesn't "raise white flags."

"I thought that in previous elections that we need to go to a unity government, and they said that we would win against him in the third elections, and we saw what happened."

"The law today allows the prime minister to stay in his position until the court says otherwise. There are painful compromises, and I still think that it was the right decision for the State of Israel."

Regarding any future plans, he said, "We didn't give up on democratic flags, there are many achievements here. There is no legislation that will not be agreed upon. In the first year we will only deal with the coronavirus. Any consented upon legislation will be done."

Go here to see the original:

Ashkenazi: This is hard for us, for me, the coalition comes with a price - The Jerusalem Post

It’s the perfect time to get into pickling – JTA News

Posted By on May 1, 2020

This story originally appeared on The Nosher.

Youve tried coaxing a sourdough starter to life or braiding a challah, turned speckled bananas into muffins, maybe even churned out sheets of pasta. For those lucky enough to hunker down at home in good health during the coronavirus pandemic, experimenting in the kitchen can be a welcome escape.

But what about your produce drawer? If you cant get your hands on baking staples right now, or are looking for a stay-at-home food project thats a bit more nutritious, consider pickling and fermenting.

By making your own pickles or kraut, you can stretch the contents of your fridge, save wilted fruits and vegetables, and make something that lasts for months. Youll also be leaning into a long, rich tradition embraced by Jewish cultures all over the world, a tradition of preserving foods to last in times of scarcity and uncertainty.

Its more of a lifestyle than a recipe, says Jeffrey Yoskowitz, co-founder and chief pickler of The Gefilteria. Pickling and fermenting, says Yoskowitz, who also teaches Jewish food anthropology, is a way of making sure you dont waste, using resources to plan ahead, he says. If you are someone who does this at home, you always have something to add acidity, freshness, and essential nutrients to whatever youre eating.

Which is why, he explains, these methods were a bedrock of Eastern European Jewish cuisine for centuries. To survive the long, harsh winters of that region, preserving cabbage, beets, carrots, cucumbers and turnips was key to making it through to the spring.

In our current reality, who knows if and when you can go to the supermarket or what they may have, says Yoskowitz, co-author of The Gefilte Manifesto cookbook. Things are changing so rapidly, but if you pick up a bunch of green beans or turnips or beets or carrots, you can make them last and have more vegetables between crucial grocery outings.

(Lauren Volo)

These hearty vegetables were not preserved with vinegar, which many modern pickle lovers may find surprising. Vinegar was rare and expensive in that part of the world.

Instead, Ashkenazi Jews used salt in a process called lacto-fermentation, which just requires a brine made from salt and water. The process, an ancient technique discovered in China, came to Eastern Europe in the 16th century via nomadic Turks and Tatars, according to Gil Marks Encyclopedia of Jewish Food. It was embraced for its low cost, the sour, tangy flavor it created and its ability to keep these foods edible for months.

Lacto-fermentation also ups nutritional value, creating good bacteria that studies have shown reduce inflammation, aid digestion and support the immune system. This was also important to staying healthy during those harsh winters.

I like to think youre improving these foods by fermenting them, Yoskowitz says, adding that this nutritional boon is especially valuable now, when processed foods and pantry staples may be in heavy rotation.

A note on the difference between pickling and fermentation:

Fermented pickles are made by submerging vegetables in that saltwater brine, causing naturally occurring good bacteria in the air to gradually turn the vegetables sugars into lactic acid. That process of creating acid lacto-fermentation is why foods fermented with just salt still taste sour. Traditional kosher dill pickles, for example, get their distinctive flavor this way.

Vinegar pickles, on the other hand, use, well, vinegar, and sometimes sugar and spices, and are not fermented. When stored in the fridge, they are called quick pickles or refrigerator pickles. What youll likely find at the grocery store, though, are vinegar pickles that have been canned in boiling water in order to be shelf-stable. Essentially, fermented pickles just use salt, spurring lacto-fermentation, while non-fermented pickles are made with vinegar. So not all pickles are fermented. And not all fermented foods are pickled think yogurt, wine, cheese, sourdough bread and more.

In a time before refrigeration, its hard to underestimate how revolutionary and critical techniques like lacto-fermentation were for survival, says Emily Paster, author of The Joys of Jewish Preserving.

Plus, to make sauerkraut and other simple fermented vegetables, if youve got clean glass jars, salt and a knife, youre ready to start, she says.

Paster points out that though pickling, fermenting, and preserving vegetables and fruit are more often associated with Ashkenazi Jews (like deli pickles, apple sauce and sauerkraut), whatever part of the Diaspora you come from, this tradition was there and it goes back centuries.

(Sonya Sanford)

Sephardic and Mizrahi Jews, despite living in more temperate climates, made the bounty of the season stretch, too, she notes, from extending the short apricot season by floating excess fruits in sugar syrup to making sure citrus was on hand all year round by encasing whole lemons in salt to pickled vegetables like the pink turnips ubiquitous in falafel joints today.

The Talmud even mentions pickles, stating that one who is about to recite the blessing over bread must have salt and leaftan a word that comes from the word for turnip that means relish or pickles, Marks encyclopedia explains.

Of course, flavor also was a reason to preserve. While tangy sauerkraut and root veggies livened up an otherwise bland winter diet for Eastern Europeans, schug, a fiery fermented hot sauce, and amba, a condiment made from pickled mangoes, added heat and brightness to Middle Eastern and North African dishes, says Yoskowitz. They can do the same for rice, pasta and any other basics were relying on heavily during this crisis.

For Paster, these techniques are a reminder of how past generations thought about food: rarely was it wasted or taken for granted. In contrast, shopping and cooking for food right now is a massive wake-up call, she says, since were used to getting any ingredient we want, any time of the year, and making as many trips to the store as we need.

Yoskowitz agrees. Like much of Jewish food history, pickling and fermenting is about embracing restraint and restriction, he says, from Spanish Jews making sausage out of chicken instead of pork or German Jews making a version of challah with potato.

Embracing this creativity while creating something mouth puckering, delicious and nourishing in the process is inspiring, says Paster.

Its a connection to an earlier time, to our ancestors, she says. It makes you feel good and self-reliant.

Ready to get started? Try these crispy garlic dilly beans from Yoskowitz and Liz Alpern or North African preserved lemons from Paster.

View original post here:

It's the perfect time to get into pickling - JTA News

Israel MPs give govt more time to use spy agency against virus – The News International

Posted By on May 1, 2020

JERUSALEM: Israels parliament on Thursday extended a deadline set by the Supreme Court for the government to put forward a bill authorising its controversial use of the domestic security agency to track coronavirus infections.

In a ruling on Sunday, Israels top court had given the government until Thursday to begin a primary legislative process that would authorise the Shin Bets coronavirus surveillance or discontinue it. But the court ruling also gave the government the option of asking parliament for an extension. In a meeting on Thursday morning, parliaments foreign affairs and defence committee gave the government until midnight Tuesday to obtain legislative approval without having to discontinue its use of the spy agency. Committee chairman Gabi Ashkenazi said the cabinet was meeting on the issue on Sunday, and if it decided not to pursue legislation authorising the programme, the surveillance would be halted immediately. Ashkenazi added that if the government confirmed it wanted to move forward with legislation and requested more time, parliament would consider prolonging the extension.

But he stressed the need to explore alternative technologies for monitoring possible carriers of the novel coronavirus beyond the Shin Bets methods. Last month, the government authorised the spy agency to monitor citizens mobile phones under emergency powers to combat the pandemic.

Excerpt from:

Israel MPs give govt more time to use spy agency against virus - The News International

With Gantz out of the way, Netanyahu marks a new target – Haaretz

Posted By on May 1, 2020

After Independence Day ended Wednesday night, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu joined a conference call with a bevy of Likud officials. On the line were ministers Yuval Steinitz, Yoav Gallant, Zeev Elkin, Tzipi Hotovely and Eli Cohen, and party whip Miki Zohar.

The lockdown is over, the curfew is lifted, Netanyahu announced. He wasnt talking about the coronavirus but the long silence imposed on Likud ministers in recent weeks. He was in a good mood, said a number of people who took part.

There were two reasons for the change in the silence policy. The first contains two parts: the High Court hearing on whether to let a Knesset member under criminal indictment form a government, and the legality of the coalition agreement between Netayahus Likud and Benny Gantzs Kahol Lavan. The petitions on the former question will be heard Sunday, and those on the latter will be heard Monday.

The High Courts decision is expected no later than Wednesday, a day before the end of the 21 days after which if a new government isnt formed or the president doesnt grant more time the Knesset will be dissolved and a new election will be called.

The second reason is the coalition talks between Likud and the Yamina party to its right.

The message of deterrence that Netanyahu instructed his ministers to spread around was: Any annulment of one section of the coalition agreement that would force a return to the table would trigger a new election.

The result wouldnt be the replacing of Netanyahu by another Likud MK who may be innocent of any crime but wont have the unique merits as the criminal defendant testified about himself in Likuds response to the court petitions. Instead, the result would be a fourth election campaign. The High Court will sin, and the public will pay.

We've got more newsletters we think you'll find interesting.

Please try again later.

The email address you have provided is already registered.

Over the past year, toward the end of which Netanyahu became a full criminal defendant, weve gotten used to all sorts of abominations. So it was nothing unusual that a person indicted for bribery, fraud and breach of trust whose trial will open in three weeks ordered his ministers to use threatening language against the top court.

The High Court of Justice, he told them, cant intervene in coalition agreements. This is a well-known principle of constitutional law. Well, none of the ministers bothered to tell him about the sections of the agreement that turn constitutional law into Play-Doh.

One example is the coalition agreements shortening of the Knesset term to three years and the co-called Norwegian Law under which an MK is replaced when he or she resigns after being appointed a minister. That gambit tramples on the people's voting rights.

As he was sending his ministers to the media, there was a turnabout Thursday of course in no way connected to the Prime Ministers Office or residence. The protesters outside the home of Attorney General Avichai Mendelblit who have been attacking the entire legal system had moved all the way to the Jerusalem office of Supreme Court President Esther Hayut. They gathered in front of the building to remind its residents, the members of the High Court Party, as they put it, that the justices dont make the decisions, the public does.

These Bibi-ists, who lambaste the courts, the prosecutors and the police, have proved that they dont do anything without the approval of the denizens of the prime ministers residence. Thats why we should view their little get-together as a promo for the Likud election campaign, if another is decreed upon us. Lacking a major political enemy after the breakup of Kahol Lavan in late March, the bulls-eye on the High Courts back can almost draw itself.

What would happen if the High Court changed sections of the coalition agreement that serve Gantz? That's what I asked a Likud official close to Netanyahu. Would that too lead to a new election? After all, Kahol Lavan is saying: What the High Court rules, we will do.

The Likud official said: There is no danger that the High Court will rule entirely in our favor.

I asked a few Likud people this week if they assume that Netanyahu actually hopes the High Court will intervene so he can blow up the coalition agreement and enter another election campaign against the deep state and have the voters choose: Whos the boss? Hed be asking: Who runs the country, the people through their elected officials or a small, elitist, unelected group of judges and prosecutors sowing evil?

Everyone I asked said they thought Netanyahu prefers a new government now over such an election. After all, currently theres a severe economic crisis with high unemployment and a recession on the way that could be deep and long. So you never know how it will end.

But its clear that Netanyahu is ambivalent. Hell be forced to share power for the first time in his 14 years in office. In terms of his approaching trial, the agreement doesnt give him anything.

And theres always his small hope that the next time his bloc will top 60 Knesset seats; then all this unity-shmunity, corona-shmorona can be dumped in the garbage. On the other hand, the last two times he also believed in this sweet birdsong, which was accompanied by the chorus of his wife and son. And it didnt help

The new Great Satan

Every day that passes since Netanyanu and Gantzs signing of the coalition agreement less than two weeks ago, Bibis position only gets better. The spread of the virus is under control, the number of patients on ventilators is plummeting, and the hysteria that he himself inflamed has ebbed. The curve flattened at just the right time for Netanyahu before Memorial Day and Independence Day.

In a video this week, we saw Sara Netanyahu outlining a heart with her fingers with a scary twinkle in her eyes. And of course this happened at the beginning of the Independence Day torch-lighting ceremony. You know, the ceremony that was once the birthright of the Knesset speaker. Now the speaker is Gantz, and he tends to indulge Netanyahu in his many desires.

Now its clear why Likud insisted on rescuing the committee on national symbols and ceremonies from the Culture Ministry which is supposed to go to Kahol Lavan and leave it with the outgoing head of the that ministry, Miri Regev, the chief spoiler of the royal couple.

In any case, its also clear that Bibi is in Cinema Paradiso. Kahol Lavan has thrown itself on a live hand grenade for him. Or to use another metaphor, the rump Gantz party is at Netanyahus feet, humiliating itself at his every whim, whether in the Knesset, in the media or at the High Court.

Netanyahu never imagined that someone who just a moment earlier planned to block an indicted politician from serving as prime minister would be sending his lawyers to write sentences like: The ending of the prime ministers term bears much broader implications than those in ending a cabinet ministers term.

And with another major achievement, its hard to know whether to attribute it to Machiavellianism at its best or the spinelessness of the other side. This other achievement was letting Kahol Lavan do the drawing up of legislation.

Its as if the unity government being established on the ruins of Basic Laws, on the diminution of the Knessets standing and the shackling of the High Courts hands is an initiative of Kahol Lavan. In doing so, Netanyahu has sentenced Kahol Lavans members to a long and painful stoning by their former partners, the betrayed politicians in Yair Lapids Yesh Atid and Moshe Yaalons Telem.

At the head of the parliamentary committee grinding all these leftovers and abominations into constitutional sausage is a new MK, Eitan Ginzburg of Kahol Lavan. He has suffered a deluge of scorn and abuse from his former colleagues, with whom he had fought in the trenches for three election campaigns.

And all this is happening as Likud whip Miki Zohar and his friends watch from the stands, with their protective masks just barely concealing their broad smiles. Oh, what a lovely civil war.

Its very likely that Netanyahu, a talented political tactician, foresaw all these inputs. But he certainly never imagined that Lapid, the likely new opposition leader and a skilled and determined rival, would declare that when the day to rotate the premiership approaches, hell join up to help prevent Gantz from taking over. This declaration would have been an earthquake if it came as a slip of the tongue or the product of a closed discussion.

But it didnt, it was carefully planned. Lapid entered the committee room at the beginning of the week, sat down and delivered the message.

What a crazy world. In the three election campaigns within 11 months, Lapids banner was complete opposition to Netanyahus staying in power before the indictments were filed and certainly afterward. Amid the possibility that Netanyahu would leave the Prime Ministers Office and be replaced by the person in whose tall shade Lapid had stifled his ambitions for a year, Lapid pulled the rug out from under Gantzs feet and granted some extra hope to Netanyahu.

Only a lethal combination of hatred, vengefulness, disappointment and frustration could lead to this declaration that turned Gantz into the Great Satan and Netanyahu into his deputy. Or to use PC terminology, the alternative Satan.

Even Netanyahus crystal ball couldnt have shown him how Kahol Lavans cohesive cockpit would end up as perhaps the ugliest divorce in Israeli political history. We can assume that most of Lapids voters dont identify with his declaration. We can also assume that this threat will never be carried out. He wouldnt dare. But this assumption hasnt reassured Kahol Lavan.

Right face

If the expanded panel of 11 justices appointed by Hayut gives Netanyahu and Gantz a green light to continue, the next hurdle for Netanyahu will be the Yamina party of Defense Minister Naftali Bennett. (Of course, people on the right say the panel, which tends to be liberal, will liberally strew mines in this case.)

Despite the grumbling coming from the prime ministers residence, and his allergy to Bennett and Ayelet Shaked, Netanyahu prefers to have them inside the government. As Lyndon Johnson once said, its better to have your enemies inside the tent pissing out than outside pissing in.

The only question is the price. Netanyahu is offering them a proposal that seems fair: the Education Ministry and the Jerusalem Affairs and Heritage Ministry. Plus theyd also get a deputy ministership with responsibility for the World Zionist Organizations settlement division the apple of the settlers eye and for national service, which the religious-Zionist community also highly values.

This is an appropriate harvest for Yaminas six Knesset seats but not compared to what it has today in the caretaker government: defense, education and transportation. It also doesnt compare to what Labors Amir Peretz and Itzik Shmuli are looting: a socioeconomic portfolio for each. It also doesnt compare to what Israels infamous two new princes, Zvi Hauser and Yoaz Hendel, are extorting: the chairmanship of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee plus a seat on the Judicial Appointments Committee for Hauser and a whole ministry for Hendel.

But its definitely satisfactory compared to the crumbs left for Likud, the largest party with 36 seats. The way we have shrunk on behalf of unity, Yamina must do the same, Netanyahu reportedly said.

Bennett is still playing hard to get. As far as hes concerned, this is an insulting offer that doesnt respect his eminence and that of his forgotten partner, Shaked two potential prime ministers; well, certainly pretentious ones. On Thursday, the six MKs boycotted the vote in the Knesset on the rotation amendment. They still dont know if theyll be in the government or in the opposition.

People close to Netanyahu are wondering just what it is that Bennett wants. After all, defense, foreign affairs and justice are already in Kahol Lavans hands, and the Finance Ministry is going to Likuds Yisrael Katz. Education is a very senior portfolio, everyone agrees. Likuds Gilad Erdan or Miri Regev would kill for it.

Netanyahu has instructed his ministers: Tell the media that there are no ideological differences between Likud and Yamina; in other words, Bennett and Shaked are playing ego games at the expense of the right.

During that nighttime conference call, there was plenty of the macabre. The Likud ministers, sword hanging over their heads, were sent on their last mission before it falls on them: Let Yamina prey on whats left; 10 or 11 ministries, most of them minor, are at stake. Is there no limit to our altruism? these Likudniks were surely wondering.

Anything but the Health Ministry

As one minister asked Netanyahu, in this day and age, how will we explain that were not insisting on the health portfolio? Well, Netanyahu answered, Kahol Lavan is demanding it, and were discussing the price with him. If we reach an agreement, I suppose theyll appoint a career public servant.

Gantz wouldnt shed a tear if his No. 2, Gabi Ashkenazi, gave up on the Foreign Ministry and heroically took on health. With a knife between his teeth and camouflage paint on his cheeks, the former soldier would be so destroyed by the failures, bureaucracy, diminished personnel and missing beds that hed go MIA.

But Ashkenazi isnt even thinking about it. He doesnt believe he needs to prove his valor, and besides, one concession was enough. During the three election campaigns he was declared the next defense minister; in the agreement with Netanyahu, Gantz has taken that job for the first 18 months.

So Ashkenazi will be foreign minister. When the airlines are back in business, he intends to pass through the VIP lounge at Ben-Gurion Airport en route to Washington and European capitals.

Despite his rugged image, Ashkenazi expects many meetings around the globe with ministers and legislators Capitol Hill included. He often talks about the excellent contacts he has cultivated in Washington, also when he was army chief. Ashkenazi plans to take an active part in the discussions on annexation in the West Bank; sources close to him say hes the moderate you might even say the most leftist of the Kahol Lavan bunch that will navigate this issue.

With or without the health portfolio, Sunday is the big day. Just like Netanyahu, Kahol Lavan officials will be watching the live broadcast of the High Courts hearing on the coalition agreements.

And speaking of Blue and White, as the name of Gantzs party translates, faces were a pale blue this week when Kahol Lavans leaders heard Lapids threat to thwart the rotation of the premiership. They had no idea where it came from; even after the ugly breakup they had hoped Lapid would go easy on them. They thought maybe he would take a middle road: Attack your former partners (after all, the same votes are up for grabs if theres an election), but not forget that Netanyahu is still the main target.

To their amazement, theyve been Lapids only targets over the past two weeks. Theyre finding it hard to cope, a person close to the party told me. Theyre busy with Lapid, with the schism, and with allaying their voters concerns (to no avail). Until a moment ago, Kahol Lavans leaders were used to being hated by half the people and loved by the other half. The new reality is a tough one.

Still, I asked, how are they preparing for the scenario of no government and a new election, after the romance with Netanyahu and Likud? What ticket would they run on?

They trust the legal construct of the agreement with Netanyahu, which was drawn up by their legal adviser, Avi Licht, a source close to them said.

And what if the High Court shows no trust in that agreement, I asked, and we find ourselves in an election in three months? Whats their plan?

Cross your fingers and pray.

Continued here:

With Gantz out of the way, Netanyahu marks a new target - Haaretz

Hassidim and the 1786 plague in Tiberias: We’ve been here before – The Jerusalem Post

Posted By on May 1, 2020

In the year 1777, a group of hassidim made the journey to the Land of Israel. The convoy was headed by two hassidic masters, Rabbi Menahem Mendel of Vitebsk (1730-1788) and Rabbi Avraham of Kalisk (1741-1810).The group comprised 300 people a sizable crowd for such a journey. Indeed, previous groups that had come to the Land of Israel had been significantly smaller.The size of the group was also noteworthy considering how many Jews lived in the Land of Israel at that time. According to estimates, the hassidic aliyah resulted in a 5% increase in the local Jewish population, which numbered some 6,000 people.Over a century after the event, the Zionist writer Rabbi Binyamin (Yehoshua Radler-Feldman, 1880-1957) would describe this hassidic voyage as the Mayflower. It should be noted, however, that not all of the travelers identified with the nascent hassidic movement.The new immigrants settled in Safed, before local tensions resulted in some of them including Menahem Mendel moving to Tiberias in 1781.In 1786 nine years after the hassidim had arrived in the Land of Israel a plague struck the Galilee region.Before setting out for the Land of Israel, Menahem Mendel had been an influential local hassidic leader. He had tried to meet Rabbi Elijah of Vilna the foremost leader of the mitnaggedim, the anti-hassidic faction in an earnest attempt to lower tensions between the feuding camps. Alas, his mediation efforts were unsuccessful. Even in absentia, Menahem Mendel continued to serve as a long-distance hassidic leader.The fledgling hassidic community in the Land of Israel relied on the generosity of its European counterparts, and Menahem Mendel regularly corresponded with colleagues and disciples. In the wake of the 1786 plague, he wrote a letter describing some of the tumultuous events that had occurred. The letter appears to have been written in the summer of that year.MENAHEM MENDEL did not have a specific name for the outbreak, nor did he describe the symptoms; he simply used generic terms. According to the letter, the plague broke out in Tiberias, and though it was torrid, the plague did not last long. It raged for about seven weeks, from around Purim to the beginning of the Hebrew month of Iyar.The rabbi recounted that the Tiberias hassidic community decided not to flee the city, primarily because it was not clear where it was safe to be. Instead, they closed the courtyard shared by the hassidim. With only a few more than 10 men in the courtyard, they were able to hold daily services and pray not only for themselves but for the lives of all of the House of Israel.Others in Tiberias acted similarly, going into self-imposed quarantine and mostly surviving. Those who fled Tiberias were chased by the plague and smitten. Menahem Mendel made a point of noting that the plague did not differentiate between Sefardi and Ashkenazi Jews.The letter was not just a report; it was also an appeal. During the quarantine, the community had borrowed money, and it was now turning to benefactors in Eastern Europe, asking for assistance in repaying the loans. Menahem Mendel explained that it was no small feat that they had succeeded in obtaining essential goods during this tumultuous episode.He also recounted what happened to hassidic Jews who were living in Pekiin at the time. When Menahem Mendel moved to Tiberias in 1781, some hassidim remained in Safed. When a plague struck Safed in 1785, they fled to Pekiin. Now, a year later, they chose a different route: They ran to caves in the Galilee and survived in hiding. Alas, when the Pekiin hassidim returned to their village, they found their homes ransacked and possessions looted.By the month of Iyar, the plague had subsided, but people remained in lockdown until after the festival of Shavuot. The letter was written after Shavuot, and Menahem Mendel noted that even though they were no longer in quarantine and freely moved about Tiberias, they cautiously avoided coming in contact with people from nearby Damascus just as they had been wary of coming in contact with people from Safed and Acre during the 1785 plague.By the time Menahem Mendel put pen to paper, the plague had passed, so his tone was buoyant as he expressed thanks to God for salvation. The letter was signed by those who had endured the plague without loss: each name represented a family that had survived. The rabbi warned that a missing name was not an indication of misfortune. The letter had to be handed to the courier, and many people were not available to affix their signatures, particularly those in Pekiin, Safed and on the road to Aleppo. The writer nevertheless added a few names of individuals and families who had not signed the letter but that he knew to be well.Menahem Mendel concluded with a request that the recipient Rabbi Yissachar Ber of Lubavitch copy the letter and distribute duplicates to all the hassidic leaders, in particular to the grandsons of the Baal Shem Tov. In addition to the fund-raising element, Menahem Mendel encouraged the hassidic community to rejoice with its representatives in the Land of Israel who had just survived a devastating plague. The writer is on the faculty of the Pardes Institute of Jewish Studies and is a rabbi in Tzur Hadassah.

Original post:

Hassidim and the 1786 plague in Tiberias: We've been here before - The Jerusalem Post


Page 1,115«..1020..1,1141,1151,1161,117..1,1201,130..»

matomo tracker