Page 1,193«..1020..1,1921,1931,1941,195..1,2001,210..»

Judge raises concern over attitude of Hasidic mother in care row – The Australian Jewish News

Posted By on February 29, 2020

Judge Judith Rowe said the woman made a litany of detailed criticisms about her ex-husband during the latest round of litigation.

She complained that he let the children, aged nine and seven, use non-kosher toothpaste and played non-Jewish music in the car.

Get The Jewish News Daily Edition by email and never miss our top storiesFree Sign Up

The judge said the woman remained rigid and had spoken in a way which was extremely concerning.

Detail of the case emerged more than three years ago.

Judge Rowe, who has overseen family court hearings in London, raised concern about the womans attitude in the latest in a series of rulings published online.

She has not identified the family involved.

The couple had lived a Satmar ultra-orthodox Jewish life, and litigation began after the man left the community.

The children remained with their mother but spent time with their father.

Judge Rowe has decided the parents should share their childrens care.

The father described a settled, happy, modern orthodox life, said the judge.

I thought the fathers evidence was straightforward, measured, loving and affectionate about the children.

She said the womans evidence was by contrast, extremely concerning.

The mother advanced a litany of detailed criticisms against the father including the wrong kippah, the non-kosher toothpaste, allowing the children mixed swimming on holiday, bathing the children together, playing non-Jewish music in the car, not showing the children that he was using a permissible light switch during the Sabbath, and giving chocolate yoghurt that is not kosher, said the judge.

Every allegation seemed to be of equal concern to the mother.

Judge Rowe said if the children were to remain healthy they had to be supported to become part of both parents worlds.

While the fathers life has moved far closer to a life in which the children can be and are seen to be comfortable and happy, the mother has remained rigid in her condemnation of anything outside Satmar, said the judge.

The mother has shown in her evidence that if anything she is more rejecting than previously of anything not Satmar or against Satmar.

The mother must change her position. She must support the children in their involvement in the fathers life now.

I will not countenance the exclusion of this father from a full role in the secular and religious lives of his children.

Read more:

Judge raises concern over attitude of Hasidic mother in care row - The Australian Jewish News

Bernie Sanders says he is proud to be Jewish so why is he skipping the biggest celebration of Jewish pride? – JTA News

Posted By on February 29, 2020

NEW YORK (JTA) On Sunday night, Sen. Bernie Sanders announced via tweet that he would not be attending the upcoming AIPAC policy conference in Washington, D.C., accusing the pro-Israel lobby of being a platform for bigotry. His statement came one week after his campaign released a video about how Sanders is proud to be Jewish and a month after a four-minute video with similar themes.

Given that Sanders refuses to address the diverse, bipartisan group of 18,000 pro-Israel, mostly Jewish constituents, one is compelled to ask: What kind of Jewish pride does Sanders have?

Only four years ago, Sanders thanked his supporters for a landslide victory in New Hampshire and notably left out his Jewishness.Instead, he described himself asthe son of a Polish immigrant who came to this country speaking no English and having no money. As one rabbi noted at the time, no Pole would have considered him their own.

Two days later, in a debate with Hillary Clinton, Sanders referred to his historic candidacy of somebody with my background without overtly stating he was Jewish.

At the time, the media, his detractors and even his supporters pondered on why he avoided his Judaism. A better question today, as the candidate is making his Jewish identity more central to this years campaign, is why a proud Jew refuses to engage with one of Jewish Americas most influential organizations.

One answer can be found in Sanders most recent campaign video itself.

Set to solemn music, the two-minute clip focuses on the rise in violent anti-Semitism and white nationalism, the Trump administrations toxic rhetoric and the Sanders familys persecution during the Holocaust.

The clip is a manifestation of underdog Judaism, one rooted in powerlessness and victimhood a Judaism of suffering, persecution and discrimination.

In 110 seconds, viewers are shown clips of neo-Nazis chanting threats in Charlottesville, heaps of Jewish corpses in a concentration camp, the wrought-iron gates of Auschwitz and an ambulance at the scene of the infamous Monsey attack, when a man wielded a machete at Hasidic Jews on Hanukkah.

What emerges is not a video about Jewish pride but about Bernie Sanders supposed commitment to fighting anti-Semitism and religious bigotry.

Here, a paradox develops. While Sanders condemns anti-Semitism, he shows us that the only thing he is proud of is the Jewish experience of persecution. The Judaism he can accept is one that is helpless, indefensible and virtually powerless a voiceless, crippled Judaism. A Judaism devoid of the State of Israel.

But Jews with some inkling of memory know all too well about the consequences of powerlessness.

On Oct. 6, 1943, a delegation of 400 rabbis marched to Washington, D.C., to ask President Roosevelt to do more to save European Jews. Infamously, the group was told that the president was busy. Later it was learned that Roosevelt had several free hours.

AIPAC was founded on the footsteps of this story, and the heaps of the Auschwitz ashes, after the organized American Jewish community learned a painful lesson: Powerlessness did little to help the plight of their European brethren.

Since then, the lobby has been unapologetically committed to bipartisanship, even at times when both sides agree on little. Despite what its critics believe, AIPAC does not give campaign contributions (the PAC in its name stands for public affairs committee) and wont endorse any candidates. Its commitment to bipartisanship often places it squarely between partisan issues it would rather avoid, like having to explain Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahus surprise visit to Congress or President Obama walking back his red line policy against the Assad regimes use of chemical weapons the same one he enlisted AIPACs help to promote.

AIPAC is the voice on Capitol Hill insisting that Americans put policy before party lines. Its focus on passing legislation rather than the personalities who pass them holds up a mirror to American citizens and politicians who arent doing the same, the ones who are too enwrapped with the polarized zeitgeist to allow reason to preside. It pays little heed to the buzz of populism or fringe progressivism.

Ifthe enemy of my enemy is my friend,AIPACshould be the coolest kid on the block it is routinely accused of both pandering to the left and levying attacks on the Democratic Party.

It is precisely the lobbys bipartisan nature that is anathema to Sanders, whose campaign strategy is to paint the world in Manichean terms, dividing Americans into us vs. them, good vs. evil.

This paradigm, in which suffering is sacred, puts a modern Israel one that is stronger, politically and militarily, than the one Sanders experienced when he spent time on a kibbutz in 1963 firmly in the evil category.

One cannot be serious about Jewish pride if the only virtuous Jew is a persecuted one. To quote the late Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir: If we have to have a choice between dead and pitied and being alive with a bad image, wed rather be alive and have the bad image.

AIPACs conference next week will be the greatest show of American support for its vital ally in the Middle East. It will feature Reform Jews, Orthodox Jews, gay Jews, straight Jews, Democrats and Republicans all uniting under one tent for a common cause. There will be moments of unity and moments of divide, moments of praise and moments of critique.

But there will be 18,000 constituents raising their voices together. If that is not Jewish pride, what is?

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of JTA or its parent company, 70 Faces Media.

Go here to see the original:

Bernie Sanders says he is proud to be Jewish so why is he skipping the biggest celebration of Jewish pride? - JTA News

Theatre Review: ‘The Wanderers’ at Theatre J – MD Theatre Guide

Posted By on February 29, 2020

Dina Thomas as Esther in Theatre Js production of The Wanderers. Photo by Teresa Castracane.

Anna Zieglers beautiful and riveting new play peels away the window dressing of two seemingly disparate Jewish marriagesone secular, the other Hasidicto reveal the unseen commonalities that bind the two couples together, with a startling twist that explodes in emotion, the audience learning all is not as it appears to be.

Stifled by the roles that gender norms have allotted them, wives Esther (Dina Thomas) and Sophie (Kathryn Tkel) seek ways to create more meaningful lives, efforts that ultimately threaten the status quo of the communities they inhabit and the marriages they enteredboth women divulging the intense desperation they feel at being trapped in relationships that demand, in both overt and subtle ways, that they subjugate their ambitions to their husbands demands.

If you love great theatre, you must see The Wanderers. Without a doubt, it is one of the best plays on offer this season.

Husbands Schmuli (Jamie Smithson) and Abe (Alexander Strain) also make decisions that threaten to upend their lives, one in keeping with the culture he was raised in, the other driven by the trauma inherited as a result of a tumultuous break with that same culture.

Director Amber McGinnis has assembled a brilliant cast. Strain (Abe) draws the audience into Abes tormented inner world, awash in guilt and self-loathing, and Tessa Klein (Julia) deftly projects a subtle detachment, the meaning of which becomes clear as the truth is revealed. Kathryn Tkel (Sophie) embodies the angst and disappointment of a mid-life crisis, communicating both heartbreak and spirited defiance, andDina Thomas (Esther) alternately provides some of the plays most stirring moments as well as frequent comic relief. Jamie Smithson (Schmuli) delivered such a convincing performance that he almost seemed to have walked straight out of a Hasidic community and onto the stage.

Andrew R. Cohens (scenic design) set is awash in light but sparsea simple bench serving as the only prop. Heather Lockards (costume design) costumes serve to provide an authenticity to the proceedings with her detailed attention to the subtle and not-so-subtle differences in dress among characters living in very different worlds.

Witty and moving, this is a story about good people trying to do their best, but coming up short, something we can all understand. If you love great theatre, you must see The Wanderers. Without a doubt, it is one of the best plays on offer this season.

Running Time: Approximately 1 hour and 45 minutes with nointermission.

The Wanderers runs through March 15 at Theatre J, Edlavitch DC Jewish Community Center, 1529 16th Street, NW Washington, DC 20036. For more information or to purchase tickets, click here.

Read the original here:

Theatre Review: 'The Wanderers' at Theatre J - MD Theatre Guide

KJ fraud convict expected to win early prison release – Times Herald-Record

Posted By on February 29, 2020

A Kiryas Joel man incarcerated for 19 years for financial fraud may leave prison five years ahead of schedule under a new law that makes him eligible for home confinement when he turns 60 in September.

Mordechai Samet, arrested with other suspects in an FBI roundup in 2001 and charged with leading several fraud schemes, appears to have overcome a major drawback to early release: the prospect that he would then be deported back to his native Israel. He and a group that lobbied on his behalf say federal authorities last week lifted the immigration detainer on him, enabling the father of 11 to return to his family in Kiryas Joel when he gets out.

The Orthodox Jewish newspaper Hamodia reported the decision on Feb. 22, based on an interview with the leader of an organization that campaigned for prison reforms Congress passed in 2018 and for Samet's early release under that law, the First Step Act.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the agency that reportedly agreed to remove Samet's detainer after refusing to do so last year, didn't respond to requests from the Times Herald-Record to verify the report.

Samet, reached by email at Otisville Federal Correctional Institution, told the Record he was informed that the detainer had been lifted. He had been uncertain about his release prospects in earlier email exchanges with the Record since November, saying he didn't know how to resolve the problem with the detainer and his Israeli citizenship.

Rabbi Moshe Margaretten, who announced ICE's decision on Twitter and was the source for the Hamodia story, told the Record he would call back when he was reached on his cell phone on Friday, but he didn't. The article indicated that his group, Tzedek Association, secured the ICE decision with White House support and other politicians' help.

Margaretten said on Twitter on Feb. 21: Tzedek is thrilled to share the amazing news that with the help of Hashem, after many months of tireless efforts by a tremendously talented team of advocates in DC and NY, we can confirm that ICE has lifted the detainer of Mordechai Samet!

Activists had been collecting donations for months to lobby for a reprieve for Samet from what was viewed in the Hasidic community as an excessive sentence. One online campaign, which features a 10-minute video about Samet's case with testimonials from his children and other supporters, indicates it raised more than $1.1 million.

The provision of the First Step Act that benefits Samet is one that allows federal prisoners to be released at age 60 and finish their prison terms under home confinement if they have served two thirds of the sentences.

Samet was set to be released from prison in 2025 for his 2002 conviction on 33 counts of racketeering, money laundering and other charges. Colleen McMahon, the federal judge who presided over the cases of Samet and his co-defendants, accused him of living a life of unremitting fraud and defining the word racketeer when she sentenced him.

He led a group of mostly young men that netted more than $5.5 million through a series of scams, including fake lotteries and using dozens of fake identities to obtain fraudulent tax refunds and business loans. Samet was ordered to pay $4.1 million in restitution to the government as part of his sentence.

Eleven of the 14 men who were charged pleaded guilty, two were convicted after trials and one was never located.

cmkenna@th-record.com

Read more:

KJ fraud convict expected to win early prison release - Times Herald-Record

What is the Talmud? Biblical Meaning & Definition

Posted By on February 28, 2020

TALMUD

tal'-mud (talmudh):

I. PRELIMINARY REMARKS AND VERBAL EXPLANATIONS

II. IMPORTANCE OF THE TALMUD

III. THE TRADITIONAL LAW UNTIL THE COMPOSITION OF THE MISHNA

IV. DIVISION AND CONTENTS OF THE MISHNA (AND THE TALMUD)

1. Zera`im, "Seeds"

2. Mo`edh, "Feasts"

3. Nashim, "Women"

4. Neziqin, "Damages"

5. Kodhashim, "Sacred Things"

6. Teharoth, "Clean Things"

V. THE PALESTINIAN TALMUD

VI. THE BABYLONIAN TALMUD

VII. THE NON-CANONICAL LITTLE TREATISES AND THE TOSEPHTA'

1. Treatises after the 4th Cedher

2. Seven Little Treatises

LITERATURE

The present writer is, for brevity's sake, under necessity to refer to his Einleitung in den Talmud, 4th edition, Leipzig, 1908. It is quoted here as Introduction.

There are very few books which are mentioned so often and yet are so little known as the Talmud. It is perhaps true that nobody can now be found, who, as did the Capuchin monk Henricus Seynensis, thinks that "Talmud" is the name of a rabbi. Yet a great deal of ignorance on this subject still prevails in many circles. Many are afraid to inform themselves, as this may be too difficult or too tedious; others (the anti-Semites) do not want correct information to be spread on this subject, because this would interfere seriously with their use of the Talmud as a means for their agitation against the Jews.

I. Preliminary Remarks and Verbal Explanations.

(1) Mishnah, "the oral doctrine and the study of it" (from shanah, "to repeat," "to learn," "to teach"), especially

(a) the whole of the oral law which had come into existence up to the end of the 2nd century AD;

(b) the whole of the teaching of one of the rabbis living during the first two centuries AD (tanna', plural tanna'im);

(c) a single tenet;

(d) a collection of such tenets;

(e) above all, the collection made by Rabbi Jehudah (or Judah) ha-Nasi'.

(2) Gemara', "the matter that is leaned" (from gemar, "to accomplish," "to learn"), denotes since the 9th century the collection of the discussions of the Amoraim, i.e. of the rabbis teaching from about 200 to 500 AD.

(3) Talmudh, "the studying" or "the teaching," was in older times used for the discussions of the Amoraim; now it means the Mishna with the discussions thereupon.

(4) Halakhah (from halakh, "to go"):

(a) the life as far as it is ruled by the Law; (b) a statutory precept.

(5) Haggadhah (from higgidh, "to tell"), the non-halakhic exegesis.

II. Importance of the Talmud.

Commonly the Talmud is declared to be the Jewish code of Law. But this is not the case, even for the traditional or "orthodox" Jews. Really the Talmud is the source whence the Jewish Law is to be derived. Whosoever wants to show what the Jewish Law says about a certain case (point, question) has to compare at first the Shulchan `arukh with its commentary, then the other codices (Maimonides, Alphasi, etc.) and the Responsa, and finally the Talmudic discussions; but he is not allowed to give a decisive sentence on the authority of the Talmud alone (see Intro, 116, 117; David Hoffmann, Der Schulchan-Aruch, 2nd edition, Berlin, 1894, 38, 39). On the other hand, no decision is valid if it is against the yield of the Talmudic discussion. The liberal (Reformed) Jews say that the Talmud, though it is interesting and, as a Jewish work of antiquity, ever venerable, has in itself no authority for faith and life.

For both Christians and Jews the Talmud is of value for the following reasons:

(1) on account of the language, Hebrew being used in many parts of the Talmud (especially in Haggadic pieces), Palestinian Aramaic in the Palestinian Talmud, Eastern Aramaic in the Babylonian Talmud (compare "Literature," (7), below). The Talmud also contains words of Babylonian and Persian origin;

(2) for folklore, history, geography, natural and medical science, jurisprudence, archaeology and the understanding of the Old Testament (see "Literature," (6), below, and Introduction, 159-75). For Christians especially the Talmud contains very much which may help the understanding of the New Testament (see "Literature," (12), below).

III. The Traditional Law until the Composition of the Mishna.

The Law found in the Torah of Moses was the only written law which the Jews possessed after their return from the Babylonian exile. This law was neither complete nor sufficient for all times. On account of the ever-changing conditions of life new ordinances became necessary. Who made these we do not know. An authority to do this must have existed; but the claim made by many that after the days of Ezra there existed a college of 120 men called the "Great Synagogue" cannot be proved. Entirely untenable also is the claim of the traditionally orthodox Jews, that ever since the days of Moses there had been in existence, side by side with the written Law, also an oral Law, with all necessary explanations and supplements to the written Law.

What was added to the Pentateuchal Torah was for a long time handed down orally, as can be plainly seen from Josephus and Philo. The increase of such material made it necessary to arrange it. An arrangement according to subject-matter can be traced back to the 1st century AD; very old, perhaps even older, is also the formal adjustment of this material to the Pentateuchal Law, the form of Exegesis (Midrash). Compare Introduction, 19-21.

A comprehensive collection of traditional laws was made by Rabbi Aqiba circa 110-35 AD, if not by an earlier scholar. His work formed the basis of that of Rabbi Me'ir, and this again was the basis of the edition of the Mishna by Rabbi Jehudah ha-Nasi'. In this Mishna, the Mishna paragraph excellence, the anonymous portions generally, although not always, reproduce the views of Rabbi Me'ir.

See TIBERIAS.

The predecessors Rabbi (as R. Jehudah ha-Nasi', the "prince" or the "saint," is usually called), as far as we know, did not put into written form their collections; indeed it has been denied by many, especially by German and French rabbis of the Middle Ages, that Rabbi put into written form the Mishna which he edited. Probably the fact of the matter is that the traditional Law was not allowed to be used in written form for the purposes of instruction and in decisions on matters of the Law, but that written collections of a private character, collections of notes, to use a modern term, existed already at an early period (see Intro, 10).

IV. Division and Contents of the Mishna (and the Talmud).

The Mishna (as also the Talmud) is divided into six "orders" (cedharim) or chief parts, the names of which indicate their chief contents, namely, Zera`im, Agriculture; Moe`dh, Feasts; Nashim, Women; Neziqin, Civil and Criminal Law; Qodhashim, Sacrifices; Teharoth, Unclean Things and Their Purification.

The "orders" are divided into tracts (maccekheth, plural maccikhtoth), now 63, and these again into chapters (pereq, plural peraqim), and these again into paragraphs (mishnayoth). It is Customary to cite the Mishna according to tract chapter and paragraph, e.g. Sanh. (Sanhedhrin) x.1. The Babylonian Talmud is cited according to tract and page, e.g. (Babylonian Talmud) Shabbath 30b; in citing the Palestinian Talmud the number of the chapter is also usually given, e.g. (Palestinian Talmud) Shabbath vi.8d (in most of the editions of the Palestinian Talmud each page has two columns, the sheet accordingly has four).

1. Zera`im, "Seeds":

(1) Berakhoth, "Benedictions":

"Hear, O Israel" (Deuteronomy 6:4, shema`); the 18 benedictions, grace at meals, and other prayers.

(2) Pe'ah, "Corner" of the field (Leviticus 19:9; Deuteronomy 24:19).

(3) Dema'i, "Doubtful" fruits (grain, etc.) of which it is uncertain whether the duty for the priests and, in the fixed years, the 2nd tithe have been paid.

(4) Kil'ayim, "Heterogeneous," two kinds, forbidden mixtures (Leviticus 19:19; Deuteronomy 22:9).

(5) Shebhi`ith, "Seventh Year," Sabbatical year (Exodus 23:11; Leviticus 25:1); Shemiqqah (Deuteronomy 15:1).

(6) Terumoth, "Heave Offerings" for the priests (Numbers 18:8; Deuteronomy 18:4).

(7) Ma`aseroth or Ma`aser ri'shon, "First Tithe" (Numbers 18:21).

(8) Ma`aser sheni, "Second Tithe" (Deuteronomy 14:22).

(9) Challah, (offering of a part of the) "Dough" (Numbers 15:18).

(10) `Orlah, "Foreskin" of fruit trees during the first three years (Leviticus 19:23).

(11) Bikkurim, "First-Fruits" (Deuteronomy 26:1; Exodus 23:19).

2. Mo`edh, "Feasts":

(1) Shabbath (Exodus 20:10; 23:12; Deuteronomy 5:14).

(2) `Erubhin, "Mixtures," i.e. ideal combination of localities with the purpose of facilitating the observance of the Sabbatical laws.

(3) Pesachim, "Passover" (Exodus 12; Leviticus 23:5; Numbers 28:16; Deuteronomy 16:1); Numbers 9, the Second Passover (Numbers 9:10).

(4) Sheqalim, "Shekels" for the Temple (compare Nehemiah 10:33; Exodus 30:12).

(5) Yoma', "The Day" of Atonement (Leviticus 16).

(6) Cukkah, "Booth," Feast of Tabernacles (Leviticus 23:34; Numbers 29:12; Deuteronomy 16:13).

(7) Betsah, "Egg" (first word of the treatise) or Yom Tobh, "Feast," on the difference between the Sabbath and festivals (compare Exodus 12:10).

(8) Ro'sh ha-shanah, "New Year," first day of the month Tishri (Leviticus 23:24; Numbers 29:1).

(9) Ta`anith, "Fasting."

(10) Meghillah, "The Roll" of Esther, Purim (Esther 9:28).

(11) Mo`edh qatan, "Minor Feast," or Mashqin, "They irrigate" (first word of the treatise), the days between the first day and the last day of the feast of Passover, and likewise of Tabernacles.

(12) Chaghighah, "Feast Offering," statutes relating to the three feasts of pilgrimage (Passover, Weeks, Tabernacles); compare Deuteronomy 16:16 f.

3. Nashim, "Women":

(1) Yebhamoth, "Sisters-in-Law" (perhaps better, Yebhamuth, Levirate marriage; Deuteronomy 25:5; compare Ruth 4:5; Matthew 22:24).

(2) Kethubhoth, "Marriage Deeds."

(3) Nedharim, "Vows," and their annulment (Numbers 30).

(4) Nazir, "Nazirite" (Numbers 6).

(5) Gittin, "Letters of Divorce" (Deuteronomy 24:1; compare Matthew 5:31).

(6) Cotah, "The Suspected Woman" (Numbers 5:11).

(7) Qiddushin, "Betrothals."

4. Nezikin, "Damages":

(1) (2) and (3) Babha' qamma', Babha' metsi`a', Babha' bathra', "The First Gate," "The Second Gate," "The Last Gate," were in ancient times only one treatise called Neziqin:

(a) Damages and injuries and the responsibility; (b) and (c) right of possession.

(4) and (5) Sanhedhrin, "Court of Justice," and Makkoth "Stripes" (Deuteronomy 25:1; compare 1Corinthians 11:24). In ancient times only one treatise; criminal law and criminal proceedings.

(6) Shebhu`oth, "Oaths" (Leviticus 5:1).

(7) `Edhuyoth, "Attestations" of later teachers as to the opinions of former authorities.

(8) `Abhodhah zarah, "Idolatry," commerce and intercourse with idolaters.

(9) 'Abhoth, (sayings of the) "Fathers"; sayings of the Tanna'im.

(10) Horayoth, (erroneous) "Decisions," and the sin offering to be brought in such a case (Leviticus 4:13).

5. Qodhashim, "Sacred Things":

(1) Zebhahim, "Sacrifices" (Le 1).

(2) Menachoth, "Meal Offerings" (Leviticus 2:5,11; 6:7; Numbers 5:15, etc.).

(3) Chullin, "Common Things," things non-sacred; slaughtering of animals and birds for ordinary use.

(4) Bekhoroth, "The Firstborn" (Exodus 13:2,12; Leviticus 27:26,32; Numbers 8:6, etc.).

(5) `Arakhin, "Estimates," "Valuations" of persons and things dedicated to God (Leviticus 27:2).

(6) Temurah, "Substitution" of a common (non-sacred) thing for a sacred one (compare Leviticus 27:10,33).

(7) Kerithoth, "Excisions," the punishment of being cut off from Israel (Genesis 17:14; Exodus 12:15, etc.).

(8) Me`ilah, "Unfaithfulness," as to sacred things, embezzlement (Numbers 5:6; Leviticus 5:15).

(9) Tamidh, "The Daily Morning and Evening Sacrifice" (Ex 29:38; Nu 38:3).

Read the original here:

What is the Talmud? Biblical Meaning & Definition

US National Library of Congress to accept book of Talmud for first time – The Jerusalem Post

Posted By on February 28, 2020

For the first time ever, a book of Talmud will be accepted into the US's National Library of Congress, the largest library in the world.The book of Talmud, translated by world renowned scholar Rabbi Adin Even Israel Steinsaltz, will be released to the library in a celebratory event due to be held on Thursday. The translation from Hebrew to English took Rabbi Steinsaltz 8 years to complete.

The event, first of its kind, will feature Jewish elected officials Congressman Eliot Engel, member of the United States House of Representatives, and Carla Hayden, Principal Director of the Library of Congress.

According to Rabbi Steinsaltz's legacy knowledge is something that connects and mediates cultures and peoples.

Translating the Talmud became the center of Rabbi Steinsaltz's life after he founded the Israel Institute for Talmudic publications in 1965, together with the Israeli government. Steinsaltz is considered by the Chabad as one of the most important rabbis of our time. His work is devoted to addressing education, the study of Talmud, Chassidism and philosophy. He has published over 60 books in many languages, and won the Israel Prize, as well as the President's medal and the 'Worthy Citizen of Jerusalem' award.

"It's a great honor for the both Diaspora and Israeli Jews to receive such honor from a great institution as important as the US National Library of Congress. For all the Talmud's thousands of years of existence, it is very exciting and meaningful for us, especially during times like these, when Judaism suffers from antisemitism," announced Mani Even Israel, the head of the Steinsaltz center.

The library is a research library that serves members, committees, the staff of the US congress and offers general lectures, concerts and exhibitions to the general public.

Visit link:

US National Library of Congress to accept book of Talmud for first time - The Jerusalem Post

Judaism and the Power of Love | Jewish & Israel News – Algemeiner

Posted By on February 28, 2020

Lets face it if you need inspiration before going out on a date or asking someone to marry you, it is unlikely that you will look for such inspiration in a collection of volumes containing Jewish law and a range of idiosyncratic narratives and there is nowhere in the Talmud where you can find love-inducing poetry or compelling romantic prose.

But there may be at least one exception.

A story in Ketubot (62b) records the first meeting between Rabbi Yehudah Hanassis son and his prospective in-laws.

February 28, 2020 12:14 pm

In order to gain their daughters hand in marriage, he proposed to them that he would remain a Torah student for at least 12 years before the wedding.

At exactly that point, the young girl in question entered the room. When her aspiring fianc saw her, he suddenly changed his tune. Turning to her parents, he said, Actually, how about making it six years, not twelve?

Even before they could answer, the young lady came in again, and upon seeing her for the second time, he was so smitten, he said to her parents, Forget the wait, how about we just get married right away, and then I will go off and study?

The Talmud records that the boy was a little embarrassed to tell his father what had happened, but his father just smiled, and told him not to worry. God did exactly the same thing as you did, he told him.

The young man must have looked a bit confused, so his father explained. After the Israelites crossed through the Red Sea, he said, they sang a son of praise, during which they included the following prophetic statement (Ex. 15:17): You will bring them and plant them in Your own mountain, the place You made for yourself to dwell in, the sanctuary, God, which Your hands established.

This was a reference to the fact that the Temple would only be built once the nation had entered the Promised Land, which seems to have been the original plan, and at that stage, everyone seemed very happy with it.

But suddenly, out of the blue, in Parshat Terumah we read that God decided to speed things up and give the nation a Temple long before their arrival in the Land of Israel.

By all appearances, said Rabbi Yehudah Hanassi to his son, just like you, God was no longer ready to wait He wanted an immediate marriage.

This story about the great rabbi and his haplessly romantic son is certainly cute, and the idea that he pacified his love-struck son by making such an analogy is both charming and heartwarming, but surely he could not have been serious?

Is it not bordering on blasphemy to say that God changed his mind like an anxious young lover thrown off his game by the appearance of a pretty girl?

As it turns out, the analogy is borne out by the facts down to the last detail. According to the Midrash, when the Jewish nation proclaimed we will do, we will listen at Sinai, God gifted them with the task of building a Temple.

But the Midrash begins its exposition with a cautionary note taken from scripture (Prov. 4:2): I have given you a fine acquisition namely the Temple so do not desert my Torah. The Temple was a gift that would exemplify commitment to Torah knowledge and Torah study, and clearly God had originally conceived for the Temple to be built only after the Israelites had immersed themselves in the study and observance of Torah over an extended period of time.

On that basis, it was only possible for the Temple to be built after they reached the Promised Land.

But then the Israelites confounded Gods intentions by saying we will do, we will listen. This startling proclamation demonstrated that they were already in love with the Torah, even if they barely knew it, in which case there was really no need to wait.

The Talmud in Berahot records a fascinating incident involving Rabbi Yohanan, who, after being informed that there were elderly Jews in Babylon, simply refused to believe it.

Are you kidding? he exclaimed, it is completely impossible for Jewish people to reach old age outside Israel the Torah explicitly says so (Deut. 11:21): your days and the days of your children will be multiplied on the land, in other words not outside the land of Israel!

He was then told that the Jews of Babylon always got up early to go to synagogue and stayed there until late, which seemed to calm him down.

The commentaries all puzzle over this story why would the early arrival and late departure from synagogue help Babylonian Jewry overcome what the verse says?

In order to explain Rabbi Yohanans strange reaction, they quote another Talmudic source. The Talmud in Megilla proposes the idea that all synagogues and Torah-centers outside the Land of Israel will be transported there at the moment of Messianic redemption.

If a location outside Israel is connected to God and Torah, it is transformed into a part of the Holy Land. On that basis, every synagogue in Babylon was already in the land that God promised your patriarchs, and those who spent time in them were in a virtual Israel, similar to when you are in a foreign country and enter your nations embassy it is as if you are on home soil. Which explains why Babylonian Jews lived such long lives.

It is this concept that clarifies Rabbi Yehudah Hanassis analogy.Plan A was for the Temple tobe builtwhen they reached the Land of Israel, and not before, as God thought that the Torah could only ever be fully appreciated in the Land of Israel.

But when everyone declared at Sinai we will do, we will listen, they were virtually transported to Israel even before they got there, and Torah was able to establish its home at an embassy in the Sinai wilderness, even though the Israelites had not yet physically reached the Promised Land.

The romantic sentiment underpinning this story is simply stunning. When you fall in love, the impossible becomes possible, and your aspirations are met even before you get there. Indeed, that is the power of love.

And even more stunning than that is the fact that this is a message embedded in the Torah and the Talmud. All you need to do is look for it.

See the article here:

Judaism and the Power of Love | Jewish & Israel News - Algemeiner

Hearts On Fire – The Jewish Press – JewishPress.com

Posted By on February 28, 2020

Photo Credit: Jewish Press

Speak to Bnei Yisrael and let them take for Me a portion, from every man whose heart inspires him to generositygold, silver, and copper; turquoise, purple and scarlet wool; linen and goat hair; red-dyed ram skins, tachash skins, acacia wood, oil, spices, incense; shoham stones and stones for the settings (Shemos 25:2-7).

The most expensive and valuable of these items were the shoham stones and the stones for the settings the Talmud (Kiddushin 31a) says they cost 800,000 gold dinars but they are listed last in this long list. Why?

The Ohr HaChaim answers this question and in the process teaches us a fundamental principle. He explains that these stones were donated by the nesiim who didnt have to expend any effort to attain them; the Talmud (Yoma 75a) tells us that they were brought to the nesiim by the Clouds of Glory. All the other contributions were brought by average members of the Jewish nation who exerted themselves to bring them. Their contributions were thus more significant and therefore listed first.

The Torah tells us that these donations came from people who were generous of heart. Goodness and charitableness were integral components of the donations as indicated how much effort was involved.

Rav Chaim Shmulevitz observed that the essential element of avodas Hashem is effort and travail. The greater the effort and exertion, the more precious the avodah is to Hashem and the more significant it therefore is.

The Talmud (Bava Metzia 38a) states that a man prefers one measure of his own produce to nine of his neighbors. Rashi explains that his own produce is particularly special to him because he toiled to attain it.

The value inherent in effort also explains why we bow when we bring bikkurim to the Beis HaMikdash, explains Rav Chaim Shmulevitz in his Sefer Chaim SheYesh Bahem. He points out that prostration is required for no mitzvah in the Torah other than bikkurim (and you shall lay it before Hashem, and you shall prostrate yourself before Hashem Devarim 26:10). Bikkurim comes after a person has exerted himself plowing, planting, fertilizing, threshing reaping, and selecting. Is there any more exalted degree of giving? asks R Chaim. Certainly, such a selfless expression merits prostration before Hashem.

In the Talmud (Berachos 35a), R Levi raises a contradiction. Tehillim 24:1 states, The earth and all it contains belongs to Hashem, but Tehillim 115:16 states, The heavens are Hashems and the earth He has given over to mankind. Which one is it?

R Levi answers that before a person says a blessing, the earth belongs to Hashem. After he says a blessing, the earth belongs to man. But since the world isnt really mans, when he gives something to Hashem, he is not really giving away his own possessions. In fact, the Chasam Sofer teaches that man cannot give Hashem anything physical; the only thing he can give is his generosity.

The Medrash tells us that when Moshe Rabbeinu had difficulty understanding the mitzvah of machatiz hashekel, Hashem showed him the appearance of a coin made of fire. Our sages tell us that the fiery coin represented passion. The real contribution is intense love and fervor for Hashem with which we give.

The renowned Ohev Yisrael wanted to know who his neighbor would be in Gan Eden, and it was revealed to him that it would be a shepherd from a faraway village. Thinking he must be an extremely holy and exalted person, the Ohev Yisrael traveled to the village to see him.

When he arrived, the Ohev Yisrael was very disappointed. The shepherd was a very simple and coarse Jew who couldnt even read Aleph Beis. The Ohev Yisrael was determined to uncover the shepherds hidden piety and decided to remain in the village for a while.

When nothing at all came to light, the Ohev Yisrael decided one day to quietly follow the shepherd when he took the flock to graze. At first he saw nothing unusual. But then suddenly, without warning, the shepherd began to wildly jump up and down with great fervor. As he leapt about, he vigorously and repeatedly shouted one word, Tamei! He did this for a long time until he fell to the ground totally exhausted.

The Ohev Yisrael was shaken and absolutely mystified. He had no choice but to approach the shepherd and ask for an explanation. Realizing the spirituality of the rabbi standing before him, the shepherd explained:

I was born in a village not far from here and was orphaned at a young age. I couldnt learn in cheder and grew up not knowing how to daven or say a beracha. I didnt learn much about Yiddishkeit. But one thing I do know. I am part of the chosen nation that is beloved by Hashem. I know that Hashem loves me very much. I have a burning desire to reciprocate that love.

I know there are various ways one can come close to Hashem, but I am not learned in those ways. I only know one word from the Torah that I heard in my youth when they read the Torah in shul. I am connected to that word, even though I dont know what it means. I have embraced that holy word from the Torah and every day I sing that word and dance before Hashem to demonstrate to Him my great love for my Father in Heaven.

Astounded, the Ohev Yisrael reverently hugged his future companion in Gan Eden. He instructed him to continue his holy service with one caveat. He suggested that the shepherd replace the word tamei with tahor.

More here:

Hearts On Fire - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com

Q&A: New Megillat Esther With Chassidic Insights for Purim – Chabad.org

Posted By on February 28, 2020

As the Jewish world prepares to celebrate Purim on Monday night, March 9, and Tuesday, March 10 (a day later in Jerusalem), a new edition of the Megillah (The Scroll of Esther) offers a comprehensive new look at the Purim story, including fascinating insights in the light of Chassidism.

Translated and interpolated by Rabbi Yosef Marcus, with additional material by Rabbi Eli Block, the volume includes a new commentary anthologized from Talmud, Midrash and classic Rabbinic commentators, as well as insights from the Chabad-Lubavitch Rebbes, and is copiously annotated and with a sweeping bibliography of sources and comprehensive indices.

Rabbi Yosef Marcus and Rabbi Eli Block recently discussed the groundbreaking new work with Chabad.org

Q: Megillat Esther is one of the most widely read, studied and cherished of the 24 books of the Hebrew Bible, with numerous editions in print. What was the motive behind this new edition? Who are your target readers?

YM: Our goal, as in the other books in this series, is to present a wide array of commentary, all on one page. Readers should be able to see the straightforward meaning, the Midrashic homilies, which are the between the lines elements that have been passed down by tradition, as well as the mystical elements, particularly as conveyed by the Rebbes of Chabad.

Our target reader is anyone interested in delving deeply into the Megillah text, beginner or scholar, who wishes to analyze it intellectually, as well as finding the spiritual guidance it can personally provide in this day and age.

Q: To the best of our knowledge, who wrote Megillat Esther, when was it composed, and when was it entered into the Jewish canon?

YM: There are various opinions on the matter. The Megillah itself, in chapter nine, attributes it to Mordechai (verse 20) and then to Esther and Mordechai together (verse 29). Some commentators suggest that Mordechai initially recorded the story briefly, and a year later, they wrote a more detailed description together. Rabbi Moshe Alshich points out that the Megillah names Esther before Mordechai in the second instance, which suggests that she initiated the writing of the longer version. The Talmud seems to attribute it to the Men of the Great Assembly, which means that they canonized it or finalized the text to its current form (see Bava Batra 15a and Lekach Tov to Esther 9:20).

According to tradition (Seder Olam), the Megillah was initially written a year after the original Purim triumph.

(Read more: Who Wrote the Book of Esther? -ed)

Q: Why do you think Esther is considered one of the great heroines of world literature? What are some of the features about her that have captured the imaginations of people around the world?

YM: There is a dramatic shift that you notice in how Esther is portrayed, which occurs at the end of chapter four. Until that point, she is described in the passive. She is adopted, taken to the pageant, taken to the king. She is loyal to Mordechai and does not reveal her religion and lineage. While it is certainly an incredible act of courage and self-sacrifice to deny the kings desire to know, it is still a passive act, framed in the Megillah as part of her loyalty to Mordechai.

At the end of chapter four, however, after Mordechai has inspired Esther to risk her life and approach the king on behalf of her people, we suddenly see a new Esther. She begins giving the orders, namely that all the Jews of Shushan should gather and fast for three days. The Midrash records that Mordechai initially pushed back at her idea of fasting for three days, since that would involve fasting on Passover, which is normally forbidden. She wins that argument, perhaps invoking her authority as a prophetess to temporarily override a law (see our commentary). From that point on we see that Esther is acting on her own, taking the initiative on how to neutralize Haman.

Certainly, the most compelling and inspiring aspect of Esthers story is her willingness to endanger her life to save others. She demonstrated that one person can avert a catastrophe and save an entire people. Furthermore, the way she went about it showed incredible patience, fearlessness and wisdom. She did not simply go to the king and beg for her people. She patiently set up a web in which to entrap Haman, while very wisely intuiting what would work with the mercurial king.

Q: What do you say about another female character in the book, Vashti? The classical narrative portrays her as a villain, but she has recently gained traction as a feminist icon speaking truth to patriarchal power. What is your reply to that?

YM: The Megillah itself does not say much about her. But like the rest of the Written Torah, we have a tradition, an oral Torah, that provides us with the between the lines. Just as the Torah does not spell out how to make tefillin or how to slaughter an animal in the kosher manner, or how to define work on Shabbat, the Torah does not give us all the detail about the characters in its narratives. Thats where the oral tradition comes in, and in that tradition, Vashti is identified as the granddaughter of Nebuchadnezar, one of our worst foes, who destroyed the Temple. She apparently did not fall far from that tree and inherited grandpas animus for Jews, encouraging her husband to prevent the rebuilding of the Temple (what my grandfather destroyed you wish to rebuild?!) and humiliating her Jewish maids, whom she forced to work on Shabbat.

(Read more: Was Vashti a Heroine? -ed)

Q: One of the things that leaps out about the work is its chronicling of individual power struggles between the major characters in the drama: Achashveirosh, Vashti, Esther, Mordechai and Haman. How are some of these dynamics illuminated in the commentaries?

YM: The power struggle between Achashverosh and Vashti is very much about her being the descendant of royalty. Rabbi Moshe Alshich points out how the Megillah alternates between calling her Queen Vashti vs. Vashti the Queen. The former is how she thought of herselfthe born queen, while the latter is how Achashverosh attempted to label herVashti who became queen by marrying him. These varying descriptions match precisely to the back and forth between husband and wife in the narrative. Yet at the end Achashverosh does refer to her as Queen Vashti, when he asks the wise men what should be done with her, perhaps trying to evoke her born royal status as a cause for leniency.

EB: Mordechai and Esther vs. Haman is much more than a power struggle; it is a battle of ego and selflessness. In the mystical reading, Haman is painted as someone whose success is unearned, who is full of conceit and therefore lacks any empathy. Mordechai and Esther are the opposite. This theme is fleshed out in the Chassidic Perspective section of the book.

Q: As anti-Semitism again rears its ugly head around the world, what does Megillat Esther, and particularly the character of Haman, teach us about how to interact with or react to those who wish to destroy us?

EB: Dont run and hide. Mordechai is a proud Jew, who is constantly referred to as Yehudi, the Jew, in the Megillah. Haman makes all the arguments of the classical anti-Semite. The Jews are too conspicuous; they are disloyal, they are parasites. Yet, at no point in the Megillah do Mordechai or Esther address Hamans accusations. On the contrary, Haman points out the Jews distinctiveness, and in response, the Jews fast, pray and organize mass study halls!

The Rebbe looked at this and said, this is a Jews response to hatred. We have to stop victim-blaming, stop thinking that if we are less this or that, peoples perceptions will change. We need to retrench ourselves in our true identity, be proud Jews, and interact with the world without apologetics. This will earn us the worlds respect, not retreating from who we are.

(Read: When We Became Jewish -ed)

Q: Megillat Esther had been chanted on Purim and studied for more than two thousand years before the Chassidic masters began to illuminate the work for the Jewish public with insights based on Jewish mystical principles. How would you characterize some of the general approaches to Megillat Esther by Chassidic commentators that were new and revolutionary?

EB: Any text the Chassidic masters handle becomes immediately both cosmic and personal. It is talking about the whole universe, yet is also aimed specifically at you. In the case of the Megillah, the Chassidic literature zooms way out, showing how the plot development, the characters and the dialogue all allude to a spiritually eternal drama of life in exile, life devoid of obvious Divine intervention. Then it zooms all the way in and shows how the Purim story is re-enacted in the heart of every person.

What are those approaches and how are they revolutionary? For that, Ill direct you to the book.

Q: What are some of the key approaches and insights to Megillat Esther provided by the Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem M. Schneerson, of righteous memory?

EB: The Rebbe had certain themes he would return to again and again in his Purim addresses.

Most prominently, the Rebbe spoke about Jewish pride and the indomitable Jewish soul. The way the Rebbe saw it, the Purim story is evidence that a Jews connection to God is eternal. The Jews of the time were intoxicated with Persian culture, they were not spiritually attuned by any stretch. Yet they found within themselves a resolve and dedication that allowed them to remain proud Jews, even while facing the prospect of destruction. This nature of the bond between God and the soul is the subject of many discourses of the Chabad Rebbes, and the Lubavitcher Rebbe in particular.

He would also speak about the power of the Jewish women as exemplified by Esther. As you mentioned, the Megillah is called the book of Esther. The Rebbe dedicated several talks to explaining her centrality to the story, and its message to women today.

(Watch: Esther, Model for Jewish Women -ed)

Purim was also an opportunity to speak about education. The Midrash describes how Mordechai gathered 20,000 children to study in response to Hamans decree; in response, Haman wanted to kill the children first. The Rebbe used this midrashic commentary as a springboard to discuss the imperative of wholesome Jewish education and how it secures the Jewish future.

And of course, joy. To spend Purim in the Rebbes court was to be witness to pure, unbridled joy. Joy, the Rebbe would say, breaks through every environmental and self-imposed limitation. Thats what Purim is all about. It is the soul unleashing itself from its constraints and rejoicing in its relationship with Gd, in the Torah and mitzvot.

Q: What are some key insights that you hope readers can take away from this work, both to make the holiday of Purim more meaningful, as well as insights that can be extended throughout the year?

EB: The Megillah has the potential to transform a persons outlook on contemporary Jewish life. There is no other story in the Torah that bears so much resemblance to our time in the sense of overwhelming assimilation. And the message of the Megillah is clear: Nothing can dampen the inherent Jewishness of a Jew. It is always there. If we develop and express that Jewishness, then we will feel complete and aligned with a purpose, and we become a positive influence on the world around us. So in our public roles, in the workplace or in leadership positions, we should be confident Jews, Yehudim as the Megillah calls us. May we merit to experience light, happiness, joy and glory, as the Jews of Purim did thousands of years ago.

Megillat Esther - With English Translation & Commentaries, Deluxe Edition is available at Jewish bookstores and online at kehotonline.com.

Read more:

Q&A: New Megillat Esther With Chassidic Insights for Purim - Chabad.org

Parshat Truma: Judaism is a gate to the real thing – The Jerusalem Post

Posted By on February 28, 2020

In this weeks Torah portion, Truma, we are swept into a world that is foreign to modern man, though magical and wondrous.We read detailed instructions for building the mishkan, the Tabernacle the temporary temple that accompanied the Jewish nation until the permanent Temple was built on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.The instructions included the Tabernacles area, height, what its walls would be made of, how the wooden boards would be connected to one another, what its ceiling would be made of, and how its opening should be closed; which ritual utensils it would contain, what these utensils would be made of, their exact size, what they would be used for and where they would be situated.We cant help but wonder: Why do you we need to know all these details?The sages of the Talmud and midrash dealt with these issues through an ideological-symbolic perspective. In their opinion, every detail represents a specific essence that exists in reality in every generation and in every culture. The Tabernacle was not only a temporary structure. It stood for several centuries until its role was finished, but the significance it represented never disappeared. For this reason for thousands of years after the Tabernacle ceased to exist Jews still listen to this parasha again and again, and try to understand, with the help of the sages, the messages we are supposed to learn from it.Thus, for example, the main item in the Tabernacle was the Ark of the Covenant. This Ark stood in the most sacred corner of the Tabernacle: the Holy of Holies. The Ark contained the two tablets that Moses brought down from Mount Sinai etched with the Ten Commandments heard at the revelation at Mount Sinai. When we consider that the central item in the Tabernacle was the Ark containing the Tablets of the Covenant, we understand that the Tabernacle was meant to preserve the memory of the revelation at Mount Sinai through the placement of the Torah, which was given at that event, in the center of the Tabernacle.The Ark therefore represents those who hold the Torah within them: those who study Torah. The following sayings by the greatest sages in Babylon during the times of the Amoraim stem from this:The verse states concerning the Ark: From within and from without you shall cover it (Exodus 25:11). Rava said: This alludes to the idea that any Torah scholar whose inside is not like his outside i.e., whose outward expression of righteousness is insincere is not to be considered a Torah scholar.... Rabbi Yannai declared: Pity him who has no courtyard but senselessly makes a gate for his courtyard (Yoma 72).If the Ark represents the talmid hacham, the Torah scholar, we must look at the components of the Ark and deduce what the desired traits are for someone studying Torah. The exterior of the Ark was made of gold, as was its interior. Therefore, concludes Rabba, a Torah scholar must be someone whose interior, his fear of God and his emotional characteristics, must be the same as the image he projects outwardly. Rabbi Yannai takes this one step further and says that being God-fearing is the main thing. The Torah is only an entrance gate to the world of God worship, to the world of responsibility and devotion, of good traits and caring. Whoever studies Torah but does not attain these traits is like someone who builds a gate that leads nowhere. Studying Torah has a purpose. We can take Moses as an example of the ultimate talmid hacham. There was no one in the history of the Jewish nation who studied and taught Torah more than he did, yet the Torah chooses to praise him for his humility: Now this man Moses was exceedingly humble, more so than any person on the face of the earth (Numbers 12:3).Every person who studies Torah should be equipped with this important knowledge: The Torah is a gate, and is the right and suitable gate, to a world that is God-fearing, full of good traits, honesty and humility.The writer is rabbi of the Western Wall and Holy Sites.

Visit link:

Parshat Truma: Judaism is a gate to the real thing - The Jerusalem Post


Page 1,193«..1020..1,1921,1931,1941,195..1,2001,210..»

matomo tracker