Page 1,211«..1020..1,2101,2111,2121,213..1,2201,230..»

‘Israel’ Will See Resurrection Day When Hezbollah Fires Precision-guided Missiles: Zionist Experts – Al-Manar TV

Posted By on February 19, 2020

A number of Israeli politicians, military commanders, and experts testified that Hezbollah precision-guided missiles can massively destroy the vital and strategic installations in the Zionist entity during any upcoming war.

The former PM Ehud Barak said that Hezbollah precision-guided missiles can hit the infrastructure, energy plants, governmental installations, the defense ministry headquarters, and the premiers office.

The commander of operations division in the Israeli army, Aharon Halifa, added that the military bases, seaports, and the transportation network will be hit during the upcoming war with Hezbollah.

The Zionist analysts went on to say that Hezbollah missiles can even hit the Knesset headquarters, describing the Resistance group as a growing monster that is unprecedentedly threatening Israel.

The analysts also called on the Israeli competent authorities to prepare in a completely different manner for the next war, which will be just as Israels Resurrection Day because of Hezbollah precision-guided missiles.

Source: Al-Manar English Website

View original post here:
'Israel' Will See Resurrection Day When Hezbollah Fires Precision-guided Missiles: Zionist Experts - Al-Manar TV

Khalidi takes on hegemonic narrative of Jewish nationalism in personal new book – Mondoweiss

Posted By on February 19, 2020

There was an urgency about Rashid Khalidi when the dean of Palestinian-American historians addressed a jam-packed crowd at the prestigious Politics & Prose bookstore in DC, Feb. 10. He told us he was taking off the academic gloves in his new book, The Hundred-Years War on Palestine. This book is more personal, he said. It draws on his illustrious familys more than hundred years experience witnessing and directly confronting the colonial invasion of his country, continuing to this day in his own work as an academic truth-teller.

A questioner challenged Khalidi as to whether he was faithful to the historians duty of objectivity. He replied, The fact is there is a hegemonic narrative about Israel and Palestine, which takes the Western, pro-Zionist perspective. Eighty percent of what is said about the issue in the U.S. sticks to the hegemonic narrative. Its not my job to repeat that narrative. Besides, historians, in fact, usually advance an argument or thesis. They dont just say, On the one hand or on the other hand.

Cover of The Hundred Years War on Palestine:A History of Settler Colonialism and Resistance, 19172017

Khalidi said the book deliberately aims at general American readers, who often know next to nothing about Palestine-Israel and, at best, see the conflict as a tragedy of two peoples struggling for their rightful national destiny. But, he argues, the real story is of a colonial conquest by the West of the small land of Palestine and a subsequent endless crushing of Palestinian resistance. The Palestinians are David; Israel is Goliath, with its external supporters. Since 1917, supporters have always included the worlds hegemons: Great Britain, the U.S., the U.S.S.R. (in the run up to statehood), and France (in the 1950s). Just as essential has been the material and political support of vast ethnic and religious networks of Zionists (think Christian Zionist).

People need to understand that Israel is a settler-colonial state, Khalidi said, but a unique one. The European Jewish colonists who literally called themselves colonial before colonialism fell into disrepute after World War II did not come from a mother country and were not part of one other nation, such as Great Britain. Rather, they came from many countries and were members of a totally modern national movement. The history of the Jews began in Palestine in Biblical times, but establishing a national state was not what Jews ever wanted before the late 1800s invention of Zionism.

In 1899, Khalidis great-great-great uncle, Yusuf Diya al-Din Pasha al-Khalidi, understood the motives and aims of the early Zionist settlers. A former mayor of Jerusalem, fluent in Turkish, German, French and English, he knew about European anti-semitism and the writings of Zionisms founder, Theodor Herzl, calling for a Jewish State. He sent a long letter in French to the French chief rabbi to be passed on to Herzl, who had long lived in Paris. He expressed sympathy and understanding for Zionist aspirations. But he warned it would be folly to try to impose a Jewish State on the Palestinians, who fully inhabited Palestine. He beseeched Herzl to abandon any such intentions. He pointed out that such a move would undermine the extensive Jewish communities that long had existed throughout the Middle East. Herzls reply was polite, Khalidi told his audience, but it simply ignored Yusuf Diyas basic point that Palestine was already inhabited by people unwilling to be supplanted.

And so began the continuing pattern of Zionists and their state sponsors dismissing Palestinians as insignificant, if not nonexistent. On that point, Khalidi cited as landmarks the 1917 Balfour Declaration; the League of Nations Mandate for the U.K. to rule Palestine; the 1947 UN Partition Resolution, which was bulldozed through the General Assembly by the U.S. and the U.S.S.R; the U.S. greenlight given to Israel in 1967 to conquer the West Bank, Gaza and the Golan Heights from neighboring Arab states; the UN response to that aggression in Resolution 242; all the way to President Trumps just-released peace plan.

In closing, Khalidi asserted that all nationalisms fabricate a history to justify themselves. But the particular and peculiar thing in the case of Israel is that the trauma and ideas that generated Jewish settler-colonialism all happened in Europe, but were moved to Palestine. In other words, for more than 100 years the Palestinian people have had a Jewish nationalist dream working itself out in their land, taking their property and destroying their rights and dignity and their very lives.

In the beginning, there was Palestine. Transforming it into the The Land of Israel has meant looking past the Palestinians who live there, disappearing them physically when possible, and all the while delegitimizing their story. Khalidi, the scion of an ancient and honored family, breaks the spell of the nationalist dream by exposing us to the existence of the Palestinian people, then and now, and telling their bittersweet story.

Go here to see the original:
Khalidi takes on hegemonic narrative of Jewish nationalism in personal new book - Mondoweiss

Pro-Israel Activists Urge Durham Jewish Federation to Drop Mayor With BDS Ties From Event – Algemeiner

Posted By on February 19, 2020

A view of the Jewish Federation of Durham-Chapel Hill building. Photo: Screenshot via Google.

JNS.org A group of pro-Israel activists in North Carolina is calling on the Jewish Federation of Durham-Chapel Hill to rescind an invitation to Durham Mayor Steve Schewel to speak at a Feb. 20 event, citing the mayors role in a 2018 city council resolution banning police training with Israel.

We believe the Federations promotion of Schewel is part of a systemic problem plaguing Jewish institutions todaythat is, the normalization of pro-BDS rhetoric that is jeopardizing the Jewish people and silencing strong Zionist voices, according to a letter obtained by JNS from the North Carolina Coalition for Israel and Fight Back Now.

We therefore implore the Jewish Federation of Durham-Chapel Hill to rescind its invitation to Schewel to introduce this event. Moreover, we urge Jewish Federations in the United States to implement policies prohibiting BDS activists from being given a platform by the organizations, the group said.

Schewel is scheduled to offer a special introduction for aneventtitled Ignited Talks: The State of Black Durham at the Levin Jewish Community Center at 7:30 p.m. on Feb. 20.

February 18, 2020 1:18 pm

Its long overdue that our Jewish leaders and institutions actively defend us from the toxic BDS advocates and sympathizers who are making this country so hostile to Zionists, said Kathryn Wolf, a Durham resident and executive director of Fight Back Now, a non-profit advocacy group battling the Deadly Exchangecampaign nationally.

We live in a region in North Carolina that is rife with anti-Zionism, she continued. Its a daily struggle to confront the constant barrage of pro-BDS speakers, seminars and events here. When our leaders undermine us by elevating BDS proponents, its hurtful, of course, but more important, its harmful.

The Jewish Federation of Durham-Chapel Hill told JNS in a statement that Schewel is not hosting the event, but that he and Durham City Council Member Mark Anthony Middleton are introducing two important speakers and advocatesHenry McKoy, former North Carolina Assistant Secretary of Commerce, and Camryn Smith, co-director of Neighborhood Allies of Durhamabout their research on the state of African-American-owned businesses and barriers to the success of those businesses in Durham today.

The focus of this event is specifically on the growth of commerce by folks of color in Durham and how the citys growth and gentrification affect those folks (which is why the Mayor and City Council Member are there). Many Durham business owners of color will be in attendance: a partnership that is unprecedented in our community. To focus on Mayor Schewel is to detract from an important, impactful issue in Durham.

The Durham City Council voted in April 2018 toapprovea policy banning its police from engaging in international exchanges where officers could receive military-style training in foreign countries.

The resolution was adopted after a coalition of groups, dubbed Demilitarize! Durham2Palestine Coalition, which includes the anti-Israel Jewish Voice for Peace that supports the BDS movement, in addition to other Muslim, pro-Palestinian and civil-rights groups, urged its passage in order to prevent any partnership the citys law-enforcement might enter into with Israels military or police.

Pro-Israel groups say the Deadly Exchange campaign by JVP incorrectlyconflatesIsrael with issues of racial bias or police mistreatment of minority communities in the United States.

Last year, a federal lawsuit wasfiled by the North Caroline Coalition for Israel and Rabbi Jerome Fox against the City of Durham that accuses the city of promoting antisemitic rhetoric and violating open-meetings laws.

Here is the original post:
Pro-Israel Activists Urge Durham Jewish Federation to Drop Mayor With BDS Ties From Event - Algemeiner

Smotrich Fights Back Against UTJ Attack Campaign Regarding "Woman Of The Wall" – Yeshiva World News

Posted By on February 19, 2020

On Monday, the pro-Zionist faction of UTJ began a campaign attacking the Yamina party and specifically the Transportation Minister Bezalel Smotrich. The attack came partly following the rumor that Smotrich allowed the Women of the Wall to set up a Tefillin Booth at the Savidor Train Station in Tel Aviv, a rumor which was refuted by Smotrichs office.

The UTJ campaign wrote: The Yamina party has lost its direction, and the values of Torah and Halacha have simply disappeared.

Following the publication of the campaign, Smotrich rebuked the leader of the UTJ party Moshe Gafne and threatened that he would take out of the archive the news where Gafne capitulated to the Christian Caucus at the Knesset Finance Committee and begin spreading it through the media. He also threatened to spread around Gafnes comments where he sided with left-wing politicians, most notably, MK Ahmed Tibi.

UTJ wised up and rebuked those responsible for the campaign and those in charge of the Zionist faction of the party. They even went so far as to promise Smotrich an apology on behalf of the faction.

Kikar HaShabbat News site stated that there is tension within UTJ with regard to how to properly approach the Zionist camp and sway them to vote for UTJ. While some believe the party should campaign with full force within the Zionist camp, Gafne believes that a more subtle approach would benefit the party more so as to avoid direct conflict with Zionist parties such as Yamina.

(YWN Israel Desk Jerusalem)

Here is the original post:
Smotrich Fights Back Against UTJ Attack Campaign Regarding "Woman Of The Wall" - Yeshiva World News

Bennett fights against voter defection in appeal to Anglo voters – The Jerusalem Post

Posted By on February 19, 2020

The critical electoral challenge facing the Yamina party in the upcoming elections was laid clear Tuesday night by a pertinent question posed to Yamina leader and defense minister Naftali Bennett by a troubled voter who above all wants to preserve the governance of the Israeli right-wing. If I want to stop Benny Gantz becoming prime minister wouldnt it be better for me to vote for Likud than Yamina? asked Chaya, an attendee at a Yamina party event for Anglo-Israelis in Beit Shemesh. Bennett described the query as the most important question of the night and took pains to argue that what was crucial was the overall size of the right-wing camp, not which is the biggest party. He pledged that Yamina would back Netanyahu to form the next government, so that voting for Yamina meant a vote for the prime minister anyway, adding his mantra that Yamina will keep Netanyahu true to right-wing values.Bennett highlighted this question because he knows why Yamina, and all the iterations of the religious, right-wing political map over the last year have foundered so badly in the polls and remain stuck on a mere seven or eight seats. The consolidation of the majority of voters around the two biggest parties has meant that the smaller parties, such as Yamina, have lost significant numbers of the electorate to the broad, national parties. So in the last two elections, right-wing, religious-Zionist voters concerned that the right-wing will lose power have voted Likud instead of for the religious-Zionist parties, which in the first election in April helped eject Bennett from the Knesset and in the second election put Yamina at just seven seats. On Tuesday night, Bennett argued forcefully to reject this trend and, as he has done over the last two weeks, highlighted what he described as Likuds lack of right-wing consistency, as well as bemoaning the efforts of other Likud, Blue and White, and others, to claw voters away from Yamina. In particular, he attacked the Likud, without directly mentioning Netanyahus name, as not being sufficiently right-wing. Fifteen years ago when a Likud government handed over parts of the Land of Israel to Arabs we tried but couldnt stop it because we were helpless, weak, and feeble, lamented Bennett in reference to the disengagement from Gaza and the evacuation of the Gaza settlements in 2005. When we came in eight years ago, Israel was racing towards a Palestinian state, and we stopped it, he boasted.No one even dared to talk about applying sovereignty over Judea and Samaria until I came out with my sovereignty plan.Bennett also trumpeted the changes senior Yamina leader Ayelet Shaked wrought as former justice minister in appointing more conservative judges to the courts and argued that Likud had done nothing to change the make up of the judicial system with which the right-wing has fought bitterly over the settlements, asylum seekers, and other issues. If you pull us out, you get the old Likud that evicted people from Gush Katif [Gaza settlements in Gaza], you get the Likud that appointed all those [left-wing] judges, you get the Likud that released a thousand murderers, Bennett said in reference to Palestinian prisoner releases conducted by Netanyahu-led governments. In the same vein, Bennett warned that without a strong Yamina a Palestinian state would be established as stipulated under the Trump peace plan. And, as he has done of late, Bennett completed his switch from espousing a broad, national vision as he did when his New Right party ran alone, to his return to a sectoral appeal for the loyalty of the religious-Zionist community. Everyones on us. Blue and White, the haredim, Liberman day in and out is attacking us, the Likud, everywhere I go Bibi comes, said Bennett. The religious-Zionist community was always beloved, but over the last five years everyone was attacking us. Why are there so many campaigns against us? Because were the battery, were the source of energy.The Yamina leader has repeated this message on several occasions over the last two weeks, including at a major campaign event and during a speech at the podium of the Knesset plenum, and the reason for his shift is clear.Having united with the religious hardliners of Bayit Yehudi and National Union, Yamina no longer has any chance of attracting the liberal, right-wing voters he was trying to attract while running under the New Right banner.At Tuesday nights event, he was instead appealing to the sense of identity, community, and religious values of the audience to halt any further erosion of the partys base towards Likud.

View original post here:
Bennett fights against voter defection in appeal to Anglo voters - The Jerusalem Post

Arab rulers and Israel’s leaders: A long and secret history of cooperation – Middle East Eye

Posted By on February 19, 2020

In the last month, Israeli leaders have been actively seeking closer relations and alliances with Arab countries, including the Gulf states, Moroccoand Sudan.

These arestates that, we are told, have finally seen the light and realised that Israel, unlike Iran, is their friend not their enemy.

This is presented as some major change of heart on the part of Arab regimes, which had apparently always shunned relations with Israelin the interest of defending the Palestinians.

This was always a fiction. Most of the 20th century'sArab leaders and ruling families maintained cordial relations with Israel and, before it, the Zionist movement.

This false narrative of resistance has been presented by Arab regimes as well as Israelis. It's been put about by pro-Israeli Arab intellectuals, who claim that these regimes unfairly spurned Israel or even went to war with it at the behest of the Palestinians, rather than in their own nationaland regime interests.

This line of thinking concludes with the assertion that now, finally, is the time that Arab governments put their own interests ahead of the Palestinians, as if they had ever prioritised Palestinian interests before.

The largest number of Arab leaders and ruling families have had cordial relations with Israel and, before it, the Zionist movement, throughout the twentieth century

This was most recently expressed by the Sudanese military commander Abdel Fattah al-Burhan after ameeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Uganda two weeks ago. It was hardly the first such meeting between Sudanese officials and Israel.

Secret overtures had taken place as early as the 1950s, when Sudan was still ruled by the British and Egyptiansand the Umma party sought to gain Israeli support for Sudanese independence.

Following independence, SudanesePrime Minister Abdullah Khalil and Golda Meir, Israel's fourth prime minister,held a clandestine meeting in Paris in 1957.

In the 1980s, Sudanese President Gaafar Nimeirimet with the Israelis and facilitated the Israeli transport of Ethiopian Jews to Israel to become colonial settlers in the land of the Palestinians.

More recently, in January 2016 and with Omar al-Bashir still in charge, foreign minister Ibrahim Ghandour sought to lift the US economic sanctions on Sudan by offering to openformal diplomatic ties with Israel.When questioned about his recent meeting with Netanyahu and the normalisation of relations, Burhans response was that relations with Israel are based on Sudans security and national interests, which come first.

The history of Sudans leaders' connections with Israel is hardly unique. Indeed, Arab cooperation with the Zionist movementgoes back to the dawn of the arrival of Zionist officials in Palestine.

It was on 3 January 1919, two weeks before the beginning of the Paris Peace Conference, that Emir Faisal Ibn al-Hussein, then of the short-lived Kingdom of Hejaz and later the king of Iraq,signed an agreement with the President of the World Zionist Organization Chaim Weizmann. Faisal consented to the creation of a Jewish colonial majority in Palestine, in exchange for becoming the king of a large and independent Arab kingdom in all of Syria.

The justification that Hussein used for his secret contacts with the Israelis was the preservation of his throne, conflated as Jordans national interest, in the face of Nassers pressure

While Faisal was denied his Syrian throne by the French colonial takeover, the agreement, which the Zionists used at the Paris Peace Conference to claim that their colonial-settler plans for Palestine had the agreement of Arab leaders, came to naught.

Not to be outdone by his brother, Emir Abdullah of Transjordan embarked on a lifelong relationship of cooperation with the Zionists, in the hope that they would allow him to be king of Palestine and Transjordan, within which they could realise their goals under his kingship. This cooperation led to his assassination in 1951.

His grandson,King Husseinof Jordan, authorised the first secret meetings between one of his army generals and the Israelis in 1960 in Jerusalem. By 1963, he himself was meeting with Israelis secretly at his doctor's officein London. By the mid-1970s his covert meetings with Israeli leaders would take placeregularly inside Israel.

Husseins long friendship withIsraeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin (who had personally expelled the Palestinian population of the city of Lydda in 1948, and initiated the break-their-bones policies against West Bank and Gaza Palestinians in 1987) was evident during Rabins funeral in 1994.

The justification that Hussein used for his secret contacts with the Israelis was the preservation of his throne, conflated as Jordans "national"interest, in the face ofEgyptian President Gamal Abdel Nassers pressure and later that of the Palestine Liberation Organisation.

Aside from the Hashemite princes and kings, theMaronite Church of Lebanon, as well as right-wing fascist Maronite leaderslike the Phalangists,allied themselves with Zionists from the mid-1940s.This alliance continues to the present, in the interest of setting up a sectarian Christian republic in Lebanon, modelled after the Jewish settler-colony.

Why have Arab rulers accepted the Trump deal?

By the early 1950s it would be Tunisian nationalists of the Neo Destourparty who met with Israeli representatives at the United Nations to help them obtain independence from the French, eliding Israels colonial-settler nature. Tunisia's authoritarian leader Habib Bourguiba would maintain these friendly relations with Israel until the end of his rule in 1987.

In the 1960s, Israel would support Saudi Arabias efforts in maintaining the rule of the imamate in Yemen against the republicans the Israelis airlifted weapons and money to the Yemeni monarchists, which were well-received.

The warmest relations in North Africa would be between Israel and the late King Hassan II of Morocco.

While Israeli leaders met with Moroccan officials in the late 1950s, warm relations had to wait till King Hassan assumed the throne. From 1960 onwardsthe Israelis, through secret agreements with Morocco, airlifted Moroccan Jews to become colonial settlers in the land of the Palestinians.

By 1963, Moroccan minister Mohamed Oufkir had concluded an arrangement with the Israelis to train Moroccan intelligence agents. Israel also helped Morocco track its opposition leaders, including Mehdi Ben Barka, who was captured and killed by Moroccan intelligence in 1965. Indeed, Yitzhak Rabin was invited by King Hassan to visit Morocco secretly in 1976.

By 1986, there were no more reasons for secrecy, and Shimon Peres visited Morocco with much public fanfare. In 1994, Morocco and Israel officially exchanged liaison offices.

In 2018, Benjamin Netanyahu met secretly at the UN with Moroccos foreign minister for talks. In the last few weeks, the Israelis offered the Moroccans their help in securing US recognition of Moroccos sovereignty over Western Sahara in exchange for Moroccos formal normalisation of relations with Israel and endorsement of Donald Trump's so-called "deal of the century".

As for the great love affair between the Egyptian political and commercial classes with Israel, it has been a public affair since the late 1970s.

Since 1991, we have seen Israeli leaders, officialsand athletesvisit most Gulf countries openly, including Qatar, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Oman, and secretly Saudi Arabia, never mind the opening of liaison or trade offices in these countries.

Arab relations with Israel, whether hostile or friendly, were never governed by the interests of the Palestinian people, but rather by their own regime interests, which they often misidentify as national interests.

Israel-Sudan: Is Abdel Fattah al-Burhan evolving into a Sudanese Sisi?

Only the latter part of the history of their love for Israel has coincided since 1991 with the Madrid Peace Conference and the Oslo Accords, which transformed the Palestinian national leadership and the PLO into an agency of the Israeli military occupation; this is testament to Israels ceaseless efforts to co-opt Arab political, business, and intellectual elites.

It is also testament of how co-optable these elites are and have always been.

While Israel has been mostly successful in its task as far as the political and business elites are concerned, it has failed miserably to co-opt the Arab intellectual class, except for those amongst them on the payroll of Gulf regimes and Western-funded NGOs. Even less has itgained any popularity among the Arab masses, for whom national interests and the colonisation of Palestinian lands, unlike for the Arab regimes, are not separable at all, and for whom Israel remains the major enemy of all Arabs.

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

Read more:
Arab rulers and Israel's leaders: A long and secret history of cooperation - Middle East Eye

The Worst Election Yet – Tablet Magazine

Posted By on February 19, 2020

As if Israels three-peat elections and Americas rolling revue of primaries, debates, and town hall meetings werent enough, another electoral campaign is upon us: By the end of February, anyone willing to part with $7.50 may cast her or his vote for the 38th World Zionist Congress.

Convened by Theodor Herzl in 1897, the WZC is a very different creature now that its original goalthe establishment of a Jewish homeland in Eretz Yisraelhas long been met. These days, the congress, which convenes every five years and consists of 500 delegates from around the world, touts itself as the Jewish peoples parliament. Israel is allotted 38% of the seats, or 190 delegates, appointed according to the breakdown of political parties in the Knesset. The American Jewish community is the second-largest bloc, with 29% of the seats, or 145 delegates, with the rest of the worlds Jewry splitting the remaining 165 seats.

So, why should we care?

The honest answer is that the reason you probably never heard of this election until very recently is because its a totally meaningless organization with no real power. The most concrete thing to come out of the congress is the privilege to appoint the leadership of a host of legacy global institutionsthe Jewish National Fund, say, or the Jewish Agencybehemoths that have less and less to do with the real lives of actual Jews but that still control, due to historical precedence, a staggering overall budget of $1 billion per year for the next five years. The head of the Jewish Agency, for example, is paid more each year than Israels prime minister ($13,130 per month) for running an organization whose biggest challenge is overseeing the absorption of a trickle of immigrants to Israel, about 30,000 per year.

The upcoming elections, like so many elections these days, seem to be primarily about partisan trench warfare, with activists on the left vying to declare victory and challenge Israels dominant right wing and machers on the right eager to further reject their liberal counterparts. Its impossible to imagine the congress facilitating difficult conversations about the thorny issuesconversion, to name but one obvious examplefacing world Jewry today. Nor is it obvious how any slate might attempt retrieving the fossilized organizations which the congress controls from the brink of extinction.

Normally, then, you might have been forgiven for suggesting that those of us who care more about actual Jewish life and spirituality and less about the alphabet soup of faceless Jewish organizations that only exist to serve their operatives stayfar away from this exercise in mutually accrediting mediocrities.

But this being the political winter of our discontent, this referendum, too, has become a slow-paced train wreck, with one well-organized faction set to win the election and then transform these decayed and hollowed institutions into bully pulpits that would allow them to proclaim, loudly, that they now speak for vast swaths of actual Jews worldwide.

They are members ofHatikvahslate, emerging as the main voice of progressive Jews, committed to working with communal partners, especially Muslim organizations, to promote a common defense to our shared safety and values through interfaith and intercommunal dialogue. On their slate youll find such heavy hitters as Peter Beinart, the columnist for the radical leftist publication Jewish Currents and a fulsome defenderof bona fide anti-Semites like Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib; Rabbi Jill Jacobs, who took to Twitter tosuggest that only right-wing white Americans can be anti-Semites, and that any violence from African American perpetrators is, well, complicated; and Jeremy Ben-Ami, leader of J Street, who just last week embraced and kissed Mahmoud Abbas, a Holocaust-denying terrorist who currently squanders a fair share of his budget to reward the murderers of Jews.

There are, of course, also well-meaning people on the Hatikvah slate, but the groups entry into the fold has made this otherwise sleepy election come to life. According to Herbert Block, the executive director of the American Zionist Movement, which oversees the elections stateside, the very first day of voting last monthattractedmore than twice as many ballots as were cast for the last congress, in 2015, and the voting rate remains high.

If youve gotten this far, my feelings here wont be a secret. The WZC was and remains a decayed organization barely worth our time and effort. But now all well-intentioned Jews, particularly ones who still feel connected to Zionism in any of its forms, need to engage, if only to make sure this run-down castle doesnt accidentally fall into the wrong hands and become a moneyed and weaponized bastion from which to attack the very thing it was supposed to defend.

So heres a rudimentary rundown. If you pay the small sum, you can choose from an unprecedentedly large field of 15 slates, or parties, many affiliated with Israeli political parties and each representing divergent views on a host of key issues, from religious pluralism in Israel to the future of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations.

The Reform and the Conservative movements both have their own slates, the formerfocused on religious equality and peace and thelatterfocused on pretty much the same things. Orthodox Jews are represented by four slates:Eretz HaKodseh, which advocates for a vibrant Israel rooted in Torah; the Orthodox Israel Coalition, which represents the Orthodox Union, Yeshiva University, and the Rabbinical Council of America, among other institutions, and which sees as its goal strengthening the engine of religious Zionism; Dorshei Torah VTzion, which bands together a host of progressive modern Orthodox groups, including Yeshivat Chovevei Torah and the Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance; andShas, the Israeli Haredi party, which hesitatingly embraced Zionism in 2010 despite being traditionally opposed to it for halachic reasons.

The Israeli-American Council and the pro-Israel advocacy group Stand With Us banded together to form Kol Yisrael, whose platform prominently asks potential voters if theyre concerned with anti-Semitism; the question is front and center withAmericans 4 Israel as well, a platform that groups Young Judea and other staunchly Zionist groups. Israel Shelanuis for and by Israelis living in America, whileAmerican Forum for Israel is focused on Jews whose families hail from the former Soviet Union and advocates everything from the strength of the IDF in defending Israel and Jews all over the world to strong Israel-diaspora relations. Ohavei Zion, in turn, represents the World Sephardic Zionist Organization, dedicated to promoting spiritual and cultural Sephardic values and heritage, andVision (tagline: The Next Stage of Jewish Liberation) appeals to young voters with grad-schoolish language about promoting conversations aimed at decolonizing Jewish identity as a necessary component of rebuilding Hebrew civilization in the modern age.

Rounding up the list are the two large blocs formed around the left-right divide, withHerut Zionistsand theZOA Coalitionpromoting a Likud-friendly agenda (Say No to an Iranian-proxy Palestinian-Arab terror state!)

Prattling about the occupation from a safe distance is one thing; coming up with a plan to ensure good and affordable Jewish education to any family who wants it is quite another. Judging by the current campaigns, the 38th congress is likely to give us little but more sound and fury.

***

You can help support Tablets unique brand of Jewish journalism.Click here to donate today.

Liel Leibovitz is a senior writer for Tablet Magazine and a host of the Unorthodox podcast.

Original post:
The Worst Election Yet - Tablet Magazine

Jewish 101-year-old woman: Hitler was my neighbor and was terrified of us – Forward

Posted By on February 19, 2020

Yahoo News

Alice Frank Stock

(JTA) A 101-year-old woman living in the United Kingdom has revealed that Adolf Hitler was her next-door neighbor.

Alice Frank Stock lived next to the Nazi leader in Munich on Prinzregentplatz Street in the 1920s and early 30s, she told the news agency SWNS.

There were two entrances, one was for our apartment and the other was number 14, and I cant remember the other one, it was number 13 or 15, and thats where Hitler lived, she said.

She didnt interact with him only catching glimpses of him as he entered the apartment under heavy guard.

I saw him once, twice coming home, she said. And his car would draw up and then two SS men would jump out and stand on each side of his way, and he rushed out to the house terrified of us, that someone will try and kill him.

Once, she recalled, she got a ticket to the opera from her school and was slated to sit in the same box as Hitler.

I got a ticket, it was in the royal box of the smaller opera, she said. I got to the royal box in the evening and there were SS men saying You cant come here, go two boxes further down. And before the curtain went up I looked at the royal box and there was Hitler sitting there.

The post Jewish 101-year-old woman: Hitler was my neighbor and was terrified of us appeared first on Jewish Telegraphic Agency.

Read the original:
Jewish 101-year-old woman: Hitler was my neighbor and was terrified of us - Forward

Essential California: On an ugly anniversary, an apology – Los Angeles Times

Posted By on February 19, 2020

Good morning, and welcome to the Essential California newsletter. Its Tuesday, Feb. 18, and Im writing from Los Angeles.

Newsletter

The stories shaping California

Get up to speed with our Essential California newsletter, sent six days a week.

You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.

Tomorrow is a dark day in California and the nations history. Wednesday marks the 78th anniversary of President Franklin D. Roosevelts signing of Executive Order 9066 in 1942. The order set the stage for the relocation and internment of 120,000 people of Japanese ancestry, most of whom were American citizens living on the West Coast, during World War II.

In Los Angeles, Rafu Shimpo the Japanese-English daily newspaper based in Little Tokyo chronicled the roundup of community leaders by the FBI and mounting fear until it printed its last issue on April 4, 1942. With the staff and publisher forcibly removed to camps, the newsroom remained vacant until they were able to resume publication after the war.

Violet Kazue de Cristoforo, a poet who ran a Japanese-language bookstore in Fresno with her husband, was pregnant with her third child when the executive order was signed. By April, she and her family were enduring stifling heat in a tar-paper shack at the Fresno County fairgrounds, which had been converted into one of the states several assembly centers for Japanese Americans on their way to internment camps. She gave birth to her daughter Kimi over an orange crate in a converted horse stall shortly before the family was relocated to an internment camp in Arkansas.

In the Bay Area, a 23-year-old Oakland-born welder refused to comply with the order, even as his family was sent to a San Bruno racetrack-turned-assembly center. Fred Korematsu changed his name to Clyde Sarah, got minor plastic surgery on his eyes to appear less Japanese and claimed to be of Spanish and Hawaiian descent. By the end of that May, he would be arrested on a San Leandro street corner and jailed in San Francisco, before being interned at a camp in Utah.

Beginning with the efforts of activists in the late 1970s, Feb. 19 has come to be known as a day of remembrance for commemorating this ugly chapter of history. But as my colleague Gustavo Arellano recently wrote, the California State Assembly will do more than just remember this week.

On Thursday, the Assembly is expected to approve a formal apology to all Americans of Japanese descent for the states role in policies that culminated with their mass incarceration.

[Read the story: California to apologize officially for historical mistreatment of Japanese Americans in the Los Angeles Times]

The resolution, which is expected to have Gov. Gavin Newsoms endorsement, was introduced by Assemblyman Al Muratsuchi (D-Torrance) and six others were co-authors. As Gustavo notes in his story, the resolution spells out Californias anti-Japanese heritage in excruciating detail, and also explicitly connects that history to the present.

Given recent national events, the resolution states, it is all the more important to learn from the mistakes of the past and to ensure that such an assault on freedom will never again happen to any community in the United States.

And now, heres whats happening across California:

Past is prologue: How Jackie Laceys and George Gascns time in office shapes the L.A. County D.A.'s race. Jackie Lacey and George Gascn spent more than three decades each working for and eventually running some of the nations largest law enforcement agencies, but their visions to run the largest prosecutorial apparatus in the U.S. couldnt be more different. The Times reviewed crime data, filing rates and other metrics to compare their respective terms in Los Angeles and San Francisco. Los Angeles Times

The Boy Scouts of America filed for bankruptcy protection late Monday as legal claims by former Scouts of past sexual abuse continue to mount. The Scouts Chapter 11 petition, filed in Bankruptcy Court in Delaware, comes amid declining membership and a wave of new sex abuse lawsuits after several states, including California, New York and New Jersey, recently expanded legal options for childhood victims to sue. Los Angeles Times

Should cars be banned on Broadway in downtown L.A.? An L.A. city councilman asked city officials to study the feasibility of a ban on driving and parking along a 1.5-mile stretch of Broadway between 1st and 12th streets. Los Angeles Times

Inside the Marciano Art Foundations spectacular shutdown: Last November, just 2 years after the museums opening, Maurice and Paul Marciano shocked the city and the art establishment by abruptly closing their new showpiece. What went wrong? Los Angeles Times

The Marciano Art Foundation opened in a converted Masonic temple on Wilshire Boulevard near Koreatown.

(Yoshiro Makino / wHY and Marciano Art Foundation)

A Poly High teacher has been placed on leave after allegations of making a racial slur and inappropriate discipline. The Long Beach Unified School District said the teacher was put on administrative leave and then returned to the classroom last week after an investigation. On Friday, she was put on administrative leave again after the district received new complaints. Long Beach Post

Enjoying this newsletter?

A cross-border collaboration between arts groups in San Diegos City Heights neighborhood and Tijuana brings its mission to a new arts space in a popular Tijuana food court. KPBS

How to cover a boss seeking the presidency? Michael Bloombergs rise in the polls has increased the pressure on political reporters employed by his news outlet. New York Times

The Democratic presidential campaign turned west this weekend, with candidates barnstorming Nevada in the lead-up to the states caucuses on Saturday. Los Angeles Times

Meanwhile, Bloomberg has spent more than $124 million on advertising in the 14 Super Tuesday states, well over 10 times what his top rivals have put into the contests that yield the biggest trove of delegates in a single day. He has also qualified for Wednesdays debate. (Reminder that Super Tuesday, which now includes California, is March 3.) Los Angeles Times

A slain Hollywood therapist had twice sought restraining orders against her former boyfriend, whos been arrested on suspicion of her murder. Amie Harwick applied for orders of protection against Gareth Pursehouse in 2011 and 2012, electronic dockets from Los Angeles Superior Court show. Los Angeles Times

U.S. officials said early Monday that 14 American passengers evacuated from the Diamond Princess cruise ship in Japan had tested positive for the new coronavirus but were allowed on flights to military bases in California and Texas. All will face a 14-day quarantine on the bases. Los Angeles Times

In the Noahs Ark of citrus, caretakers try to stave off a fruit apocalypse: Amid a bacterial infection that has upended the agricultural world, UC Riverside is working to protect its Citrus Collection, one of the largest collection of citrus trees in the world. Los Angeles Times

Two librarians from the Mark Twain Branch of the Long Beach Public Library trekked more than 8,000 miles to Phnom Penh, Cambodia, on a mission to buy Khmer books that would better serve their readers. Libraries across Southern California are aiming to serve the immigrant readers of rapidly changing cities by purchasing books in a variety of languages. Los Angeles Times

San Francisco Sheriff Paul Miyamoto is the first Asian American sheriff in California history. He was sworn in last month as San Francisco Countys 37th sheriff in 150 years. USA Today

Jewish bakeries are on the rise in the Bay Area: The region is now home to a kosher bagel shop in Berkeley, a home kitchen in Santa Clara that delivers stretchy Yemeni flatbreads, challah in San Leandro and a currently online-only babka retailer that plans to reopen in Los Altos soon. San Francisco Chronicle

San Diegos historic Spreckels Theatre building is for sale, after more than a half-century of family ownership. San Diego Union-Tribune

Los Angeles: partly sunny, 76. San Diego: partly sunny, 65. San Francisco: sunny, 62. San Jose: sunny, 68. Sacramento: partly sunny, 66. More weather is here.

This weeks birthdays for those who made a mark in California:

Rep. Jared Huffman (Feb. 18, 1964), Dr. Dre (Feb. 18, 1965), writer Amy Tan (Feb. 19, 1952), heiress and former kidnapping victim-turned-fugitive Patty Hearst (Feb. 20, 1954), mogul David Geffen (Feb. 21, 1943) and filmmaker/actor Jordan Peele (Feb. 21, 1979).

If you have a memory or story about the Golden State, share it with us. (Please keep your story to 100 words.)

Please let us know what we can do to make this newsletter more useful to you. Send comments, complaints, ideas and unrelated book recommendations to Julia Wick. Follow her on Twitter @Sherlyholmes.

See original here:
Essential California: On an ugly anniversary, an apology - Los Angeles Times

The Movement Creating Better Native American Representation in Film – Yahoo Lifestyle

Posted By on February 19, 2020

"Theres just this sad truth that most people dont really understand or realize that Native Americans are even still alive," Erica Tremblay, a queer/two-spirit Seneca-Cayuga filmmaker from Oklahoma, tells Teen Vogue. She grapples with this complexity in her latest short film, Little Chief which premiered earlier this year as part of the Shorts Selection at the 2020 Sundance Film Festival. Filmed on a rural reservation in Oklahoma with an all-Indigenous cast, Little Chief tells the story of a weary teacher struggling to keep her school and herself afloat and the connection she forms in the face of their shared traumas with an unraveling eleven-year-old, Bear.

For nearly a century, since the era of silent film, Hollywood has provided the primary avenue for Indigenous images and stories to be displayed to non-Native audiences. While historically films have played a highly influential role in shaping deeply flawed perceptions of Indigenous peoples, for example, as extinct cultures trapped in the past, contemporary filmmakers and artists like Tremblay are working to combat these dominant, largely negative narratives. In this way, contributions like hers are an attempt to reflect the complex and vibrant experiences of Native peoples and communities.

All of the representation that you find is stuck in this era and stuck in this specific part of our history," Tremblay says. "But the reality is that there are so many thriving indigenous communities in North America that are beautiful for all sorts of different reasons despite the specific struggles that they have."

The earliest depictions of Native Americans, crafted by white filmmakers, existed largely in a perversion of reality through the Western, and gave way for the birth of the Hollywood Indian in modern imagination. Films like D.W. Griffiths The Battle of Elderbush Gulch and Cecil B. DeMilles The Squaw Man, one of the first full-length feature films produced in Hollywood, told stories of American dominance over both untamed natural elements and Native American peoples, served as a convenient stand-in for more complex character development, and allowed white characters both a backdrop for and a context in which to behave. In this wild, western playground, Native American characters were reduced to a powerfully simple, yet paradoxical dichotomy of the spiritually-inspired innocence of the noble savage versus the brutality and hypersexualization of the bloodthirsty bavage.

Appearing directly opposite, the American cowboy trope provided a convenient proxy for audiences across the country, creating a heroic symbol for the imagined process of colonization of lands and the people in them. The success of these films, upheld by an audience that enjoyed viewing themselves as the benevolent victors in the battle for manmade Western expansion during a time of American exceptionalism and growth, simultaneously created such pervasive misrepresentation of Native Americans that the stereotypes, plots, and ideals depicted within these films persist today in ongoing, corrosive ways, over a century later.

The glamorization of Western expansion, of manifest destiny, of the inherent goodness of the American cowboy and his pursuits rests on a premise of erasure of Native American genocide, one which excludes narratives of violent forced displacement, rape, genocide, and child removal from their families and cultural heritage to become indoctrinated in white, Christian boarding schools.

As insidiously, the complexity of culture and individuality that exists across more than 500 federally recognized Native American tribes and beyond has, in popular imagination, also been flattened to largely inaccurate symbols sloppily stitched together from fragments of a handful of tribes. This is evident from the very inception of film at the turn of the century, from the silent film era in the 1910s through to the 1920s, and 30s a period when these characters were especially popular. John Fords 1939 Western, Stagecoach, is a landmark of this time, garnering two Oscars and cementing John Wayne as the quintessential cowboy, and perhaps American, for the first half of the twentieth century. It is a level of cultural immortality few entertainers can boast, but one which inherently furthers this destructive imagery. The popularity of Westerns waned as the 1960s closed and the antagonists in American action-adventure films shifted to other, international cultures, shockingly inaccurate depictions of Native Americans never wholly left American storytelling.

Mohawk actor Jay Silverheels as Cajou in Saskatchewan.

There are some notable exceptions, brought about in part by an Indian Actors Guild, which was formed in Los Angeles in 1966, to promote the use of Native people in Native roles, to promote the training of Indians in trick riding and other horseman skills, and to promote the teaching of dramatic skills to Indians, as explained by a 1973 academic paper titled The Stereotyping of North American Indians in Motion Pictures. Mohawk actor Jay Silverheels, most notably known for his role as Tonto in the long-running American Western television series The Lone Ranger, was a leader in this movement and helped to form an Indian Actor's Workshop at the Los Angeles Indian Center together with Indigenous artists such as Buffy Sainte-Marie. Until the 2020 Oscars, Sainte-Marie, an Indigenous Canadian activist, singer-songwriter and composer remained the only Indigenous person to have ever won a competitive Academy Award, which she won for her songwriting work on the soundtrack for 1982s An Officer and a Gentleman.

The 1970s and beyond gave way to a wave of so-called revisionist Westerns in which the classic Western tropes were complicated by the introduction of anti-heroes, questionable morals, and sympathetic villains. Conspicuously missing from these films were more nuanced depictions of Native Americans; the 1990s Dances With Wolves, The Last of the Mohicans and the animated Pocahontas were widely successful financially, yet, despite being hailed as some of the most influential depictions of Native Americans in the last 30 years, the films relied largely on white savior tropes, and centered depictions of white men going Native, that is, in derogatory terminology, a reversion to stereotypes of uncivilized society in search of self-realization and heroism. By nature of their cultural dominance, these blockbuster movies created by white filmmakers for largely white audiences were as much a continuation of the rhetoric and violence of colonization as the earliest silent films.

Around the turn of the 21st century, there was an influx of Indigenous talent in film, beginning with Smoke Signals, arguably the first film written, directed, and acted by Native Americans to see mainstream critical success. But the present moment is a complex one. The time of stereotypical, reductive depictions of Native Americans is not in the past; it now exists in parallel to more authentically representational filmmaking. This is a time in which Native American actors walked off the set in protest of 2015s The Ridiculous Six and just one year later Disney appeared to attempt righting some of its Pocahontas wrongs with the more culturally contextualized Mori-inspired tale of Moana. Yalitza Aparicios 2018 turn in the Oscar-nominated Roma offered an exceedingly rare view of the Indigenous Mexican experience. Still, despite a growing interest for international films depicting Indigenous stories, films which center specific Native American experiences created by and for Native Americans, have yet to break through to consistent mainstream success.

In the face of this staggering, insidious historical context, contemporary Native American and Indigenous filmmakers and actors have not given up efforts to correct a century of deeply flawed storytelling. Filmmakers across North America attempt to engage in what University of Chicago professor Michelle Raheja calls a visual sovereignty for Indigenous peoples, a creative act of self-representation that has the potential to both undermine stereotypes of Indigenous peoples and to strengthen the intellectual health of communities in the wake of genocide and colonialism.

Films such as Tremblays Little Chief, present an attempt to push this work further. For her, growing up in a reservation community in northeastern Oklahoma, she realized that the specificity of stories she has to tell are lost in pop culture portrayals of Indigenous and Native Americans, which are often flattened to stereotypes she calls poverty porn, where nuance of experience is limited to a uniform life on reservations where no one has running water and no one is employed.

Theres so much we havent even touched upon, theres so many cultures and so many creation stories and world views and we have this very limited, pan-Indian view, that is based only in about 300 years of history, she says. The reality is that theres some really specific and horrific challenges but theres also this beauty and this light. We love and we laugh and we have experiences just like anyone else. For Little Chief, what I really wanted to have a discussion around is [whats] underneath the daily hum of direct trauma, of intergenerational trauma, under all of those complicated layers or the casinos and the tobacco factories and the ill-stocked schools. I wanted to have a conversation about how these two people transcended all of that and have a moment of connection.

19-year-old actress and artist Sivan Alyra Rose is also a prime example of the power of self-representation, making history as the first Native American woman to lead a television series, with her role on Netflixs teen horror series Chambers. The actress, who grew up on the San Carlos Apache reservation in Arizona, experienced first-hand the impact of simply having access to create authentic portrayals of Native Americans.

There is a huge responsibility with the access to make films in the Indigenous community. We dont really have Native American-owned studios, or casting houses or many agencies to help Native American actors, Rose tells Teen Vogue. The avenues for Native Americans to create this type of content, and networks which provide access to resources, she says, dont exist. Its telling that the historic milestone she achieved in cinematic history happened only last year in 2019. Theres just so many connections that arent made within Indigenous communities that I feel like is preventing that from happening.

Still, she sees independent filmmaking and content made for YouTube to be a seeding ground for more representational storytelling, and possibly an indicator of the future Native American filmmaking. From riveting short films to pilots, she notes that these projects embody where she wants the movement to go next Native people producing these stories and having the access to distribute it through channels with wide reach. She also hopes to create something with the lighthearted writing and pop culture impact of Clueless, but with an all-Native cast, written and directed by Native people. For Rose, while revisionist histories and alternate imagined realities cant rewrite the past, they may hold a key to drawing attention to the real, lived experience of present-day Native Americans.

If we did go back and we did recreate Pocahontas, how would it look? How would everyone in the theater feel knowing that actual history didnt go that way? she says. And then today in 2020, the Native Americans of 2020 are still experiencing incredible oppression and injustice. They would be forced to see a veil lifted completely.

She points to Black Panther as an example of the impact of this type of futurism and hopes to similarly see complete casts of Native people, creating a Native version of Wakanda. Looking toward the future, Rose has been discussing potential projects with her tribal leaders back on the San Carlos Apache reservation.

Maybe Ill develop films and movies one day for Natives to feel confident in their Nativeness and to take that [confidence] into the world and not feel the need to assimilate for the benefit of what they want, she says. You dont have to do things youre uncomfortable with for this opportunity. Thats a world I would like to see.

In a chaotic awards show which largely shut out Black films and actors out of the nominations, and in which no women were nominated in the directing category, but which also saw historic wins for international films such as Parasite, Mori Director Taika Waititi Waititi did not let his presence as an Indigenous person go unseen at the 2020 Oscars. Before presenting the Academys honorary awards, (including one for celebrated Cherokee actor Wes Studi), he began with a recognition of the Indigenous people upon whose land Hollywood sits on. It was a fleeting moment of visibility for the Native American experience and context predating American colonization.

The Academy would like to acknowledge that tonight we have gathered on the ancestral lands of the Tongva, the Tataviam, and the Chumash, he said. We acknowledge them as the first peoples of this land on which the motion pictures community lives and works.

Waititi reached a historic milestone himself, winning an Oscar for Best Adapted Screenplay for his film Jojo Rabbit, a revisionist film imbued with his signature point of view and specific Jewish-Mori sensibility. Joining Buffy Sainte-Marie as only the second Indigenous person to ever win a competitive award, he dedicated his win to those that will continue the shift.

[To] all the Indigenous kids throughout the world who want to do art and dance and write stories, he said. We are the original storytellers and we can make it here as well.

Related: Celebrating Native American Heritage Month: Dos and Don'ts

Originally Appeared on Teen Vogue

Read more:
The Movement Creating Better Native American Representation in Film - Yahoo Lifestyle


Page 1,211«..1020..1,2101,2111,2121,213..1,2201,230..»

matomo tracker