Page 1,213«..1020..1,2121,2131,2141,215..1,2201,230..»

March Drinking Liberally: Combating the Rising Tides of Hate – Patch.com

Posted By on February 17, 2020

In March, Drinking Liberally-Redmond is honored to have the local chapter of the Anti-Defamation League, represented by Kendall Kosai, ADL PNW Associate Regional Director, to lead a conversation about combating the rising tides of hate in the nation, and in particular here in the Pacific Northwest.

There is no doubt that there has been a rise in hate crimes and extremism in Washington; to cite just one example, we have recently had a Washington state legislator accused of domestic terrorism. The ADL stands on the front lines in addressing these issues. Join us for a conversation around the rise of hate in Washington state and what you can do about it.

Kendall Kosai is the Associate Regional Director of the ADL Pacific Northwest Region. He spearheads the regions advocacy and community engagement work. A native to the Pacific Northwest, Kendall has worked in the civil rights space on a federal and local level for nearly a decade.

There is no fee for attending our meetings, but we do ask everyone who attends to 1) buy food and/or a drink to support the restaurant that supports us, and 2) contribute when the hat-is-passed to pay for our speakers' meal and operating expenses.

Drinking Liberally - Redmond gives like-minded progressives a place to talk politics. You don't need to be a policy expert - just come and learn from peers, trade jokes, vent in an informal, friendly environment.

"Building a Community of Progressive Action through Social Interaction"

The rest is here:
March Drinking Liberally: Combating the Rising Tides of Hate - Patch.com

Conservative movement apologizes for list of innovative rabbis that featured only men – Jewish Journal

Posted By on February 17, 2020

(JTA) The Conservative movements congregational umbrella group apologized for publishing an article about innovative rabbis that only included men.

The article by the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism in the February issue of its Journeys publication featured five rabbis who meet people where they are. Among other things, the rabbis organized events in cafes and ice cream shops to engage Jews outside of the synagogue.

But the article, which is no longer available online, quickly drew criticism on social media for its lack of gender diversity.

One of the rabbis on the list, Jesse Olitzky of Congregation Beth El in South Orange, New Jersey, even wrote in a comment Wednesday on his Facebook page that he was embarrassed and ashamed that he hadnt asked about who else was being featured on the list and that only male rabbis are represented.

Another Conservative rabbi, Daniel Novick, posted his own list on Facebook of five female rabbis meeting people where they are.

On Thursday, United Synagogue addressed the article in a Facebook post.

We apologize and take full responsibility, the organization wrote. We understand the kind of message this type of omission can send, and we are profoundly sorry.

United Synagogue also noted the many female speakers at its recent conferences and will continue to use this as an opportunity to look inward to further examine our internal processes for engaging, gathering, and sharing stories of our community.

The post Conservative movement apologizes for list of innovative rabbis that featured only men appeared first on Jewish Telegraphic Agency.

Conservative movement apologizes for list of innovative rabbis that featured only men

View original post here:
Conservative movement apologizes for list of innovative rabbis that featured only men - Jewish Journal

The Haskalah Series Part VII: Exploring The East – The Jewish Press – JewishPress.com

Posted By on February 17, 2020

Photo Credit: Jewish Press

The story of Eastern European Haskalah as compared to Western European Haskalah was different in structure, yet similar in tone. While it was less focused on the dominant gentile culture, it was just as persistent in its efforts to root out traditional Jewish culture. As for that dominant gentile culture, there was not much to aspire to in the Polish peasants or the Russian proletariat. Jewish socialist and communist factions did emerge, but they were primarily focused on political rights, although social integration was of assumed benefit as well in order to service the primary goal.

The factionalism within Haskalah points to a phenomenon we all know so well: when the Jewish soul is not preoccupied with its ultimate lifes mission service of G-d it is frenzied and displaced, and therefore absorbed with another mission, service of causes.

19th century Eastern European Jewry was absorbed in sundry movements from historical societies to political crusading, from social restructuring to Zionism, from educational reform to culture shaping. The tortured Jewish inclination to fix, to build, to innovate is on full display during the period.

This is as true today as it was then. While many secular Jews are absorbed with medical breakthroughs, political endeavors and scientific advancement, a great deal of our non-religious brethren are at the forefront of questionable activism, like securing the monkey Naruto the rights to his own photograph, or writing long-suffering articles about the sexism of the term hey guys. Jewish restlessness is apparent everywhere. The deep desire for meaning pulsates through each appeal to protect the Amur Leopard and each protest for a parents right to choose a childs gender.

As the Haskalah permeated even the most far-flung regions of Poland and Russia, the most insular communities became enraptured with the maskilic mystique. The Chofetz Chaim writes about this time: There is no house without a dead one, with a reference to the tenth plague in which each Egyptian family lost a child. For this era, there was no house without a proverbial dead one. One rabbinic figure describes how all of his siblings left the fortress of Torah observance. Another announces his decision to step down from his position as rav because his wife and children have all assimilated.

While the remaining courageous and committed Jews developed a keen sense of pride and stalwart dedication, which was needed to brave both the anti-Semitic forces without and the assimilating forces within, vast swaths of Jewry assimilated, quasi-assimilated, or simply converted during this period. Although it is difficult to properly assess, the numbers suggested are something like 50% assimilation rates in the East.

And now we return to the question we posed at the beginning of this series What happened to the Jew of old? when we wondered how the fierce and formidable Jew of our history, the Jew who withstood chronic oppression as well as sudden vicious bouts of this age-old historical malady, the Jew who had overcome countless efforts to convert and tame him, now submitted with barely a protest.

The answer is long and complex. It can be about urbanization patterns and political changes. It can be about social acceptance and the centralization of power. It can be about philosophical writings and morally bankrupt actors. It can be about emancipation efforts and educational achievements. In truth, we can hardly even assess it. It is a story too extraordinary to comprehend. We can only try to follow its maddening plot and glean what we can.

Perhaps that is best done through a personal account, which animates the actual deterioration, the messy intersection of variables so interwoven that its too reductionist to try and pull them apart for individual analysis. The story of the Haskalah is, ultimately, a human story, and therefore replete with multi-layered human behavior.

Pauline Wengeroff was born Pessele Epstein and grew up in a characteristic Jewish community in Russia. She describes her early childhood, in those insular days of the 1830s where, for shtetl Jewry, distance and the sluggish arrival of modernity preserved its isolation for but a few moments longer.

At our home the time of day was referred to by the names of the three daily services, she recounts in her memoir, Rememberings. The morning was referred to as before the davenen, afternoon was called before or after Mincheh, and dusk was between Mincheh and Maariv. With this she proudly illustrates her familys Torah-centric existence. For her father, of what importance was the life of the individual except as fruitful ground for Talmud study. For her mother, life revolved around exacting fulfillment of every Torah regulation. [my mother] gave a prize for every worm the women found [in the produce]. She lived in fear that their search would not be meticulous enough.

She describes her fathers silken caftan with its velvet stripes topped off with his regal streimel for Shabbos. She describes her mothers great joy at listening to the young men in the family immersed in their Talmud studies.

And then she describes the changes that swept through their little village, the enactment of all those abstract factors mentioned earlier. The shrinking of the Pale of Settlement that displaced her family and forced them to urbanize. The push from German Jews to educate the Russian-Jewish masses, the arrival of government authorities to enforce western costume amongst the backward Jews, and, of course, the proliferation of the written word a literary onslaught. Rav Avigdor Miller describes: Libraries have been written against the Jewish character by enemies of our people, and oceans of ink and hurricanes of speech have issued from the pens and mouths of the vilifiers of the Talmud.

The propaganda of maskilic writing was to be found everywhere. In fables that used clever metaphors to disparage the traditional Jews; in fictional serials designed to cast the old, religious grandfather as the tyrannical dictator squelching the young and in philosophical essays drawing on the words of revered figures like Maimonides to justify the study of secular education and acculturation. The one thing the maskilim were not is ignorant. Manipulating Torah writings to support an assimilationist agenda, the Haskalah thinkers drew on their own wealth of Torah learning to achieve their ambitions: the radical restructuring of Jewish culture and tradition.

Rav Reuven Grozovksy describes how, even in the yeshivos the haskalah made nests in the form of various clandestine groups and in the reading of outside literature the fire took hold even of the homes of the rabbis, where sets of Achad Haams works could now be found. Achad Haam was a popular maskil.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Paulines memoir documents how her brothers and brothers-in-law snuck novels and philosophy books into their Gemaras, taking great measures to read this material in the traditional singsong Talmudic chant so the parents would not catch on. They studied Talmud and Schiller, and they studied Schiller using the Talmudic method. Every important sentence was studied and examined, debated and analyzed out loud Fully grown men who, up until that moment, had led an almost ascetic life were blinded by the new ways the Enlightenment shattered the sacredness and destroyed many dear treasures, she writes.

And then, with the big move to the city, Pauline describes the ultimate breakdown to the traditional Jewish family the deterioration of parental authority. Quite different times began, she says. Never again did we children come under our fathers unlimited power we young people did not realize what the old people knew: that even the smallest change in external behavior would carry with it an inner revolution of the personality.

She recounts a myriad of little things. Her sister deciding to walk outside with her husband, a behavior not acceptable in this Chassidic community, which urged a level of modesty and privacy in marriage that barred public displays. Another sister choosing to wear a hooped skirt which was the rage in the 1850s, one which their mother promptly disposed of within moments. She, Pauline, forgetting the propriety of her older sisters engagements, and spontaneously hugging her intended

The incidents, which started small, spiraled into something big. Something huge. So that by the end of her life, Pauline finds herself an elderly woman who has slowly lost, willingly and unwillingly, the center fulcrum and also all the bits and pieces, the very essence of her Jewishness. She allowed her husband to convince her to dispose of her head coverings, her sheitlach, she brought treif food into her home, and ultimately, her children converted to Christianity. The baptism of my children was the heaviest blow I suffered in my entire life. But the loving heart of a mother can bear much, she writes. I grieved not just as a mother, but as a Jew, for the entire Jewish people, which was losing so many of its strong members.

Paulines is the tragic tale of countless European Jewry during this time of turmoil, excitement, hope and confusion, one which resulted in, as Pauline puts it, the destruction of so many dear treasures.

So what happened to the Jew of old?

So much happened to the Jew of old. So much, that its really impossible to say.

Read more from the original source:

The Haskalah Series Part VII: Exploring The East - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com

Column B: One person really can change the world – Myhorrynews

Posted By on February 17, 2020

Harekla Hajabba earned $2.80 a day as recently as 20 years ago, selling oranges in Mangalore, India.

An English-speaking potential customer asked him the price of the oranges, and because Hajabba couldnt read or write or speak English, he couldnt respond and missed the sale.

That experience made him wish he could start a school. He didnt want the kids in his village to go through life with the problems he had.

Still making $2.80 a day, he did start a school in a local mosque, and 28 kids showed up.

When he needed a bigger place, he got a loan. With it, and what hed saved from his $2.80 a day income, he bought a piece of property and built a real school.

At first it had room for only the primary-aged kids, but eventually, with help from his government, he expanded it enough to include high school kids too.

Today, there are 100 students at the Dakshina Kannada Zilla Panchayat Higher Primary and Composite High School.

Hajabba is in his 60s now and is working on building a college for the high school kids to attend when they graduate.

In Mangalore, they call him Askshar Santa, which means Saint of Letters.

Hes been given Indias fourth-highest civilian award, the Padma Shir, which is given to people who do good things for India.

He didnt get the first or second or third highest award because education is not a priority in that country.

Corinne Sanders wrote Hajabbas story on Morning Smiles, a feel good email site that, second to prayer, is the best way to start the day.

When you feel like you just cant take on one more chore, or help one more person, or do one more good deed, Morning Smiles is a wonderful reminder that if we werent supposed to help, whatever the situation is wouldnt have come to our attention.

To share again one of my favorite quotes from the Talmud:

Do not be daunted by the enormity of the worlds grief. Do justly now. Walk humbly, now. You are not obligated to complete the work, but neither are you free to abandon it.

Contact Charles D. Perry at 843-488-7236

Go here to read the rest:

Column B: One person really can change the world - Myhorrynews

Amnesty International mourns the loss of professor Jos Zalaquett – Amnesty International

Posted By on February 17, 2020

Jos Zalaquett was a prominent lawyer and academic, who fought for human rights, truth and justice worldwide.

He initiated his human rights work as a law student campaigning for Salvador Allende in Chile. Upon Allendes election as president in 1970, Jos Zalaquett served as cabinet minister, which he left for a post at the university. In 1973, General Augusto Pinochet launched a violent military coup which forcibly ousted the elected government of Allende and imposed a military dictatorship from 1973 to 1990. In that period, thousands of people were arrested, imprisoned, tortured, and killed.

In the aftermath of the coup, Jos Zalaquett founded the Committee for Peace to help the victims of the military regime. Under Zalaquett's leadership, the committee, later known as the Vicara de la Solidaridad, was the foremost human rights organization operating in Chile throughout the dictatorship. The Vicara defended hundreds of detainees and helped family members of the disappeared to demand legally the whereabouts of their loved ones. In retaliation for his work, Jos Zalaquett was imprisoned in 1975 and 1976, and sent into exile in 1976.

He left Chile with two military officers walking him all the way to his plane, where they sat him down and buckled his seatbelt. He moved first to France and then to the USA, where he joined Amnesty International to demand with many other Chilean exiles an end to Pinochet's dictatorship and raise awareness internationally about the situation in his home country. Pep, as he was known, became Chair of the International Executive Committee of Amnesty International, and later its Deputy Secretary General.

Jos Zalaquett was a prominent human rights lawyer who leaves behind an enormous legacy. His time with Amnesty International, as a Chair of the international Board and later as a Deputy Secretary General, was a gift for us. His wisdom and passion to fight for the rights of people have been an inspiration for Amnesty's movement

Ten years later, he returned to Chile. In 1990 Jos Zalaquett was appointed to the National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation, and with his nine colleagues wrote a report on the fate of the victims of the Pinochet regime. As such, he became an internationally respected authority on truth and reconciliation, advising similar human rights commissions on three continents. From 2001-2005 Jos served as a Commissioner at Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, including a term as its Chairman.

He was also member of the International Commission of Jurists and of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Transparency and Public Probity, and a board member of the Chilean chapter of Transparency International. Jos Zalaquett conducted human rights missions to numerous countries in Africa, the Americas, the Middle East and Southeast Asia, working on transitional justice issues. He wrote extensively about human rights in books, specialized journals and newspapers.

He was a prominent professor at different universities. Jos Zalaquett received honorary doctorates from the University of Notre Dame and the City University of New York. His awards include a MacArthur Foundation award (1990 to 1995), the UNESCO Prize for the Teaching of Human Rights (1994), the B'nai B'rith Human Rights Award, and the National Prize for Humanities and Social Sciences (Chile, 2003).

Jos Zalaquett was a prominent human rights lawyer who leaves behind an enormous legacy. His time with Amnesty International, as a Chair of the international Board and later as a Deputy Secretary General, was a gift for us. His wisdom and passion to fight for the rights of people have been an inspiration for Amnesty's movement, said Sarah Beamish, Amnesty Internationals Chair of the International Board.

Everyone at Amnesty International would like to express our deepest condolences to Pep Zalaquett's family, colleagues and community. He has left an immense legacy that will continue to guide our struggles for human rights.

Rest in Power, Pep!

For more information or to arrange an interview, contact Duncan Tucker:duncan.tucker@amnesty.org

Go here to see the original:
Amnesty International mourns the loss of professor Jos Zalaquett - Amnesty International

The Deal of the Century endorses Zionist ethno-religious claims – Mondoweiss

Posted By on February 17, 2020

President Donald Trumps deal of the century released last month was not about so much a peace plan as it was a presidential executive order that confers legitimacy and acceptance to the core founding tenets and claims of Zionism. Indeed, the deal represents the wish list for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and settler-colonial forces of Zionism in Israel and in the U.S. It is a deal both between Netanyahu and Trump on the one hand and between Netanyahu and Jewish Israeli settlers in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt) on the other, about the extent to which Zionist ethno-religious underpinnings and biblical claims of the land are going to be implemented.

In essence, Trumps peace plan is designed to appease Israeli settlers and their supporters in Israel and the United States by rejecting outright the establishment of a viable, sovereign, and independent Palestinian statelet alone recognizing Palestinians right to self-determination and liberty. Moreover, it endorses the Zionistethno-religious perceptions related to the conflict with Palestinians over the land.

President Trumpsdealnot only caters to Israelicolonialand expansionist aspirations,butit also yields to the ethno-religious underpinnings of Zionism and Israeli claims to the Palestinian land. The plan stipulates that Israel has the right to annexall Israeli settlements in the West Bank and the Jordan Valley. It further consolidates theincrementalAmericanleanings towardsJerusalem bydeclaring the citythe capital of Israel.As for the Palestinians, the plan offersa future Palestinian stateon theremainder,shrouded and isolated areas within theWest Bank, Gaza, a few East Jerusalem neighborhoods presently on the West Bank side of the wall with few exceptions, and a sliver of land that stretches into the Negev.By recognizing these underlying principles, the dealeffectivelyendorses IsraelsNation-State law passed in 2018, and long-standing assertions with regard to the land and the rights, or lack thereof, for the indigenous Palestinian population.

Israels Nation-State lawovertly states whatZionismand the state of Israelrepresent, thatThe exercise of the right to national self-determination in the State of Israel is unique to the Jewish People. Subheadlined as, Israel is the nation state of the Jewish People, the law defines the countryssymbols, legitimacy, language, laws,and religious customs. While not referencing the Bible outright, it is the clear fulcrum of the laws moral justifications.

It further assertsthe development of Jewish settlement as a national value, and shall act to encourage and promote its establishment and strengthening. Indeed, this could be interpreted to include the oPt.Therefore, the law severs any links between Palestiniansandtheirland. Trumps plan adopts almost literally these stipulations. For the Palestinians, and rightly so, it is a new version of the Balfour Declaration of 1917 that was based on Zionist claims to the land of Palestine. In this President Trump follows in the footsteps of President Woodrow Wilson who endorsed the Declaration at the time.

The essence of the Balfour Declaration is that Jewish Zionists and later Israelis are the only group of people who have the right to the land. The Balfour Declaration (and then the British Mandate) refers to Palestinians asexisting non-Jewish communities in Palestine noting, nothing shall be done which may prejudice [their] civil and religious rights. The declaration in this sense echoes the famous Zionist claim that Palestinians are not a people, and declare them a mere group with no national rights to the land.

The Jewish population,8 percent in 1918,and Jewish immigrantshadarightrecognized by the British Empireto establish a homeland. Both the Declaration and Trumpsdealdo not consider theindigenous Palestinians as havingnational rights. The deal denies byomissionany links between the Palestinians and their land whether historical, cultural or religious, while it recognizesIsraeli exclusive historical links.

Zionisms intentions from the outset of its endeavor in Palestine were explicit. In his correspondence in 1898 replying to the then-mayor of Jerusalem YusufDiya, Theodor Herzlwrote, You see another difficulty, Excellency, in the existence of the non-Jewish population in Palestine. But who would think of sending them away?

Herzls position was predicated on a European justification of colonialism. In the same correspondence, he makes it clear as to the benefits non-Jewish people will acquire from Jewish immigration to, and settlement in, Palestine. In other words, Herzl wondered if Palestinians could be convinced that Zionism would benefit them, and referred to the Palestinians as non-Jews the same as the Balfour Declaration.

Many years later, before becoming Israelsfirst Prime Minister, David Ben-Gurion wrote to his son in 1937 he aspired for territory outside of the limits discussed by the League of Nations.

A state on only part of the land isnt the end, its only the beginning,reported the Jerusalem Postin a more recent comment piece calling for expanding Israels borders, The establishment of a state, even if its only a partial one, will serve as a powerful lever in our historic efforts to redeem the entire country. Redemption is the word most used by settler-colonialists of Israel mixing colonial tenets with ethno-national underpinnings derived from religion. In his speech in 1952 Ben-Gurion asserts in reference to UN Resolution 181: This state is not identical to the land; this state is not identical to the peopleAnd we must distinguish between the State of Israel and the Land of Israel. The identification of land, people, and the state impliesthat Palestiniansare ignored. Trumps deal, if implemented, would deliver what Ben-Burion aspired to.

Ben-Gurions remark alludes to a very important Zionist ethnic-religious tenet regardingwhat expansionist call Greater Israel:manyBiblicalheritage sitesare in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, not within theborders of Israel. Trumps plan offers Israela uniqueopportunity to consolidate its position in consideringoccupied Palestinian landas an inseparable part ofGreater Israel,amost importantview withinZionism. In his book War Over Peace: One Hundred Years of Israels Militaristic Nationalism Uri Ben-Eliezer describes the ethno-religious drives that led Israel into the war of 1967, a war that was aimed to realize the land of Israel beyond the borders of the state of Israel. A war that actualized Ben-Gurions own idea of the land of Israel.

The deal of the century to a large extent reflects the influence of Zionists and like-minded individuals and groups within the close circles of the Administration. The entire team behind the deal is made up of both fervent right-wing fundamentalistsincluding Jared Kushner. Among the most prominent figures who attended the announcement of the deal was Pastor John Hagee, head of Christians United for Israel, who advocates for sovereignty over biblical holy sitesin theWest Bank, seemingly Israeli annexation of the most of the oPt.Hagee offered the closing prayers at the 2018 opening ceremony of the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem.

The deal is one of the main outcomes of the coalition between right-wing Republicans, Zionist organizations, and Evangelical supporters of Israel and Trump. One only needs to look into the close ties between Trumps team that put together thedealand two of thehardline pro-Israel groups,the Republican Jewish Coalition,or RJC,and Christians Unified for Israel,or CUFI. These ties are not a matter of political coalition only, they reflect deep beliefs.Jason Greenblatt,the former Middle East peace envoy, joined the RJC since resigning from the administration. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo,a past keynote speaker atCUFI,told the Christian Broadcasting Network thatheis a dedicated believer and that when it comes to preserving aJewish state, I am confident that the Lord is at work here.In the same interview, hefurther stated thatTrump is just like Queen Esther, to help save the Jewish people from an Iranian menace.

Then there is David Friedman, the ambassador to Israel and a former fundraiser for Israeli settlements, who appears to act as a representative of Israels interests in the U.S. No need to review the fervently-Zionist record of Jared Kushner and his friendship with Israels leaders.

Trump declared that it was Kushner, Friedman, and Greenblatt who convinced him to recognize Israels sovereignty over the Golan Heights by a short lesson in history. Friedman then responded with much zeal during his speech to the Israel lobby group AIPAC that the Golan was the gift of the Purim holiday. An even bigger gift was on the way then, and has now been presented to Netanyahu at the behest of Zionist and right-wing Republican cheerleaders of the Bible.

Read more:
The Deal of the Century endorses Zionist ethno-religious claims - Mondoweiss

Rick Wiles’ Guest: Zionists Are Using Trans Rights to Make Humans Androgynous – Friendly Atheist – Patheos

Posted By on February 17, 2020

Professional Jew-hater Rick Wiles has a colorful history of blaming the Jews for every political move he doesnt like. This week, he hosted two speakers on his TruNews program who claimed that Zionists are apparently trying to make all humans androgynous in order to take over the world or something to that effect:

Featured on the program were Messianic Jews Steve and Jana Ben-Nun of Israeli News Live, who claimed that the transgender rights movement is a Zionist plot to make all of humanity androgynous.

They want to rule the world, Jana Ben-Nun said of the Jews. They want to get Gentile riches, and they want to rule the Gentiles. They dont consider Gentiles [to be] fully human beings. In fact, as an end game, they have this strange doctrine: the Adam Kadmon doctrine. Adam Kadmon was, originally, according to the Zohar and the Talmud, he was androgynous; Adam, he wasnt male or female, he was male and female in one body, and this is why you see this transgender agenda today.

Its true that the Talmud addresses gender fluidity. But at no point do the speakers give any citation for this as a means to take over the world, which has never been a collective Jewish goal. If anything, Jews have maintained a goal of simply wanting to live freely in this world, left alone by gentiles who seek to persecute them (or worse).

The claims that these guest speakers are making that Jews are supposedly putting things in peoples drinks to make them androgynous, as if thats even possible are no different than the equally false claims of the Middle Ages, when Jews were accused of causing the Plague by poisoning the wells.

We all know how that ended up. Radical anti-Semites listening to this garbage will only be encouraged in their hate, which can embolden them to commit violence.

(via Right Wing Watch)

Read this article:
Rick Wiles' Guest: Zionists Are Using Trans Rights to Make Humans Androgynous - Friendly Atheist - Patheos

Wiles: Zionists Using Transgenderism to Conquer Gentiles, Rule the World – Patheos

Posted By on February 17, 2020

Vicious anti-Semits Rick Wiles welcomes two messianic Jews (i.e. Christians) on his TruNews show last week and they all agreed that those evil Zionists are using transgenderism to make everyone androgynous so they could conquer the gentiles and steal their money. Its not clear how exactly being androgynous would do that, but facts and logic are in short supply here.

They want to rule the world, Jana Ben-Nun said of the Jews. They want to get Gentile riches, and they want to rule the Gentiles. They dont consider Gentiles [to be] fully human beings. In fact, as an end game, they have this strange doctrine: the Adam Kadmon doctrine. Adam Kadmon was, originally, according to the Zohar and the Talmud, he was androgynous; Adam, he wasnt male or female, he was male and female in one body, and this is why you see this transgender agenda today.

Yes, Ben-Nun replied. It gets its origin in Zionism, and it gets its origin in the Talmud, Zohar, and Kabbalah. Its a Kabbalahistic doctrine of Adam Kadmon. They have this doctrine called Tikkun Olamrepairing the worldso how do they want to repair the world? They want to bring it to the original. Who was original? Adam. He was androgynous. So now theyre putting specific things in food, in drink, and basically their end game is to make humans on Earth that will survivewhatever it is they are bringingandrogynous.

What they are really trying to do is undo Gods creation, Wiles said. They are at odds with the Creator.

*scratches head* So they make everyone androgynous and then magically all the gentiles money floats away and into their bank accounts? And they suddenly rule the world? Okey dokey.

See the rest here:
Wiles: Zionists Using Transgenderism to Conquer Gentiles, Rule the World - Patheos

America’s Founding Fathers and the Jews | Jewish & Israel News – Algemeiner

Posted By on February 17, 2020

The House of Representatives Building and the East Portico of the US Capitol. Photo: Flickr.

Around Presidents Day every year, there are well-meaning declarations that Americas founding fathers were friendly to Jews and Zionism.

Friendly quotations are easy to find, but private attitudes tell a different story.

Unexcelled benevolence was true of President George Washington.

On August 18, 1790, congregants of Americas oldest synagogue, Touro Synagogue of Newport, Rhode Island, warmly welcomed President Washingtons visit to their city.

February 17, 2020 7:56 am

Responding that same day, Washington promised the synagogue more than mere religious tolerance because: It is now no more that toleration is spoken of as if it were the indulgence of one class of people that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent natural rights. His letter declared the Government of the United States gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance. He also invoked the Hebrew Bible: May the Children of the Stock of Abraham, who dwell in this land, continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other Inhabitants; while every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and fig tree, and there shall be none to make him afraid.

Compared to this, President Thomas Jefferson offered abstract support for religious liberty combined with Deistic disdain for Jews and Judaism: Jews hold ideas that are degrading and injurious to Jesus possess imperfect and immoral ethics, and their social behavior is repulsive.

Perhaps most interesting is the contrast between second president John Adams and sixth president, his son John Quincy Adams.

Respected by virtually everyone but liked by almost no one, John Adams was an exacting man whose philosophy combined Enlightenment beliefs with a bedrock Puritan faith rooted in lifelong Bible reading.

Adams wrote two important letters to Mordecai Manuel Noah, the American Jewish diplomat, journalist, and early Zionist.

In 1808, he criticized Voltaire, the antisemitic Enlightenment philosopher: How is it possible [that he] should represent the Hebrews in such a contemptible light? They are the most glorious nation that ever inhabited this Earth. The Romans and their Empire were but a Bauble in comparison of the Jews. They have given religion to three-quarters of the Globe and have influenced the affairs of Mankind more, and more happily, than any other Nation ancient or modern.

Then, in an 1819 letter to Noah, he wrote: Farther I could find it in my heart to wish that you had been at the head of a hundred thousand Israelites & marching with them into Judea & making a conquest of that country & restoring your nation to the dominion of it. For I really wish the Jews again in Judea an independent nation.

However, he added the caveat that I believe once restored to an independent government and no longer persecuted they [the Jews] would soon wear away some of the asperities and peculiarities of their character & possibly in time become liberal Unitarian Christians.

John Quincy Adams was brought up on Bible reading, but had a less charitable attitude towards Jews. He reiterated his fathers hope for the rebuilding of Judea as an independent nation. Yet, as early as the 1790s, he complained in his diary about Jewish money changers in London, and publicly recoiled from the Jews of Frankfurt because the word filth conveys an idea of spotless purity in comparison with Jewish nastiness.

Historian Harold Brackman is coauthor with Ephraim Isaac of From Abraham to Obama: A History of Jews, Africans, and African Americans (Africa World Press, 2015).

Link:
America's Founding Fathers and the Jews | Jewish & Israel News - Algemeiner

Pro-Israel activists urge Durham Federation to nix event involving mayor tied to BDS resolution – JNS.org

Posted By on February 17, 2020

(February 17, 2020 / JNS)

A group of pro-Israel activists in North Carolina is calling on the Jewish Federation of Durham-Chapel Hill to rescind an invitation to Durham Mayor Steve Schewel to speak at a Feb. 20 event, citing the mayors role in a 2018 city council resolution banning police training with Israel.

We believe the Federations promotion of Schewel is part of a systemic problem plaguing Jewish institutions todaythat is, the normalization of pro-BDS rhetoric that is jeopardizing the Jewish people and silencing strong Zionist voices, according to a letter obtained by JNS from the North Carolina Coalition for Israel and Fight Back Now.

We therefore implore the Jewish Federation of Durham-Chapel Hill to rescind its invitation to Schewel to introduce this event. Moreover, we urge Jewish Federations in the United States to implement policies prohibiting BDS activists from being given a platform by the organizations, the group said.

Subscribe to The JNS Daily Syndicateby email and never missour top stories

Schewel is scheduled to offer a special introduction for an event titled Ignited Talks: The State of Black Durham at the Levin Jewish Community Center at 7:30 p.m. on Feb. 20.

Its long overdue that our Jewish leaders and institutions actively defend us from the toxic BDS advocates and sympathizers who are making this country so hostile to Zionists, said Kathryn Wolf, a Durham resident and executive director of Fight Back Now, a nonprofit advocacy group battling the Deadly Exchange campaign nationally.

We live in a region in North Carolina that is rife with anti-Zionism, she continued. Its a daily struggle to confront the constant barrage of pro-BDS speakers, seminars and events here. When our leaders undermine us by elevating BDS proponents, its hurtful, of course, but more important, its harmful.

The Jewish Federation of Durham-Chapel Hill told JNS in a statement that Schewel is not hosting the event, but that he and Durham City Council Member Mark Anthony Middleton are introducing two important speakers and advocatesHenry McKoy, former North Carolina Assistant Secretary of Commerce, and Camryn Smith, co-director of Neighborhood Allies of Durhamabout their research on the state of African-American-owned businesses and barriers to the success of those businesses in Durham today.

The focus of this event is specifically on the growth of commerce by folks of color in Durham and how the citys growth and gentrification affect those folks (which is why the Mayor and City Council Member are there). Many Durham business owners of color will be in attendance: a partnership that is unprecedented in our community. To focus on Mayor Schewel is to detract from an important, impactful issue in Durham.

The Durham City Council voted in April 2018 to approve a policy banning its police from engaging in international exchanges where officers could receive military-style training in foreign countries.

The resolution was adopted after a coalition of groups, dubbed Demilitarize! Durham2Palestine Coalition, which includes the anti-Israel Jewish Voice for Peace that supports the BDS movement, in addition to other Muslim, pro-Palestinian and civil-rights groups, urged its passage in order to prevent any partnership the citys law-enforcement might enter into with Israels military or police.

Pro-Israel groups say the Deadly Exchange campaign by JVP incorrectly conflates Israel with issues of racial bias or police mistreatment of minority communities in the United States.

Last year, a federal lawsuit was filed by the North Caroline Coalition for Israel and Rabbi Jerome Fox against the City of Durham that accuses the city of promoting anti-Semitic rhetoric and violating open-meetings laws.

Read the original here:
Pro-Israel activists urge Durham Federation to nix event involving mayor tied to BDS resolution - JNS.org


Page 1,213«..1020..1,2121,2131,2141,215..1,2201,230..»

matomo tracker