Page 1,216«..1020..1,2151,2161,2171,218..1,2301,240..»

Palestinians outraged by peace meeting with Israelis in Tel Aviv – The Jerusalem Post

Posted By on February 16, 2020

Palestinian factions have condemned the participation of Palestinian figures in a meeting organized by The Israeli Peace Parliament, a public unaffiliated forum whose members are former representatives of a variety of political parties and movements, including former ministers and members of the Knesset.Fridays meeting in Tel Aviv was held under the banner Yes to Peace, No to Annexation and Two States for Two People.Twenty Palestinians participated in the meeting. Among them: former Palestinian Authority economy minister Bassem Khoury; former PA health ministers Fathi Abu Mughlieh and Sameeh al-Abed; former PA local governance minister Hussein al-Araj; and former PA prisoners affairs minister Ashraf al-Ajrami.The Israeli delegation was represented by former Labor MK and interior minister Ophir Paz-Penis; former Knesset speaker and Jewish Agency chairman Avraham Burg; former foreign minister and interior minister Shlomo Ben-Ami; former Labor MK Colette Avital; and several former Meretz MKs.Denouncing the gathering, Hamas said it was a blow to all Palestinian positions rejecting US President Donald Trumps recently unveiled plan for Mideast peace."Hamas spokesman Hazem Qassem said the meeting was also a form of normalization with Israel that is rejected by all Palestinians. These meetings encourage some parties in the region to normalize their relations with the Zionist entity, Qassem said. They also weaken the movement of solidarity with our Palestinian people. He also criticized the PA for allowing such meetings with Israelis despite its leaders threats to cut all ties with Israel.Palestinian Islamic Jihad official Ahmed al-Mudalal strongly condemned the meeting in Tel Aviv. How can we convince the world to reject normalization [with Israel] when some of us are promoting it and involved in it? he asked. These meetings are intended to support Trumps 'Deal of the Century.'The PLOs Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) denounced the meeting as a stabbing of the Palestinian people. Fridays meeting between Israelis and Palestinians was held under the direct sponsorship of the PA leadership and Mahmoud Abbas, the PFLP claimed.The PFLP called on the PA leadership to dismantle the PLOs Committee for Interaction with Israeli Society, which is responsible for organizing meetings between Palestinians and Israelis. Participation in normalization meetings with hostile Zionists proves that the Palestinian leadership is not serious about renouncing the Oslo Accords, halting security coordination [with Israel] and suspending all meetings with the Zionist entity, the PFLP added.Al-Ahrar (The Free), a group of dissident Fatah members in the Gaza Strip, denounced the meeting as national and immoral crime and said it violated the PAs position against the Trump plan. The meeting encourages the occupation and the US administration to continue their steps to implement the Trump plan, the group said.

Read the original:
Palestinians outraged by peace meeting with Israelis in Tel Aviv - The Jerusalem Post

Oy vey: Zionist surfing website attacked by Jewish foundation, called "despicable, anti-Semitic!" – BeachGrit

Posted By on February 16, 2020

Scared of nobody, loved Hawaii etc.

Yesterday, the gatekeeper of surfings historical archives, Matt Warshaw, loosed a three-minute filmictribute to former worldnumber two, Jodie Cooper.

If that name ringeth a bell, it might be because much of last year was eaten up by a court case where she successfully accused a Lennox Head local, the surf mat aficionado Mark Thomson, of attacking her in the surf.

But, as you will learn, there is much, much more to the dazzling Jodie Cooper.

BeachGrit: Yesterday you loosed a swinging little clip of Jodie Cooper, a woman who remains an important strand in our cultural DNA for two reasons: one, she was one of the female pros who loved surfing Hawaii and, two, she didnt take any shit from boneheads. Do you remember when Johnny Boy Gomes belted her at Rocky Point? Lets gather around the campfire while you retell that fabulous story.

Warshaw: I re-read Jodies version of the Johnny-Boy story yesterdaywhat a nightmare, on so many levels. Apparently everybody in pro surfing was out at Beach Park, I think it was 1993. Johnny-Boy and Bud Llamas take off on the same wave, get tangled, John comes up and starts knocking Bud around. Everybody looks the other way, except Jodie, who tells Johnny to chill out, so he lets go of Bud, paddles over and hits Jodie in the head. Nobody in the water does or says a thing. For two years after that, she says, he harassed her.

And, then, just last year, she was pounced on and wrestled by surf-mat king Mark Thomson at Lennox.

And before that, she got bit by a shark. On the hand, shaved off a couple of knuckles.

Johnny-Boy and Bud Llamas take off on the same wave, get tangled, John comes up and starts knocking Bud around. Everybody looks the other way, except Jodie, who tells Johnny to chill out, so he lets go of Bud, paddles over and hits Jodie in the head. Nobody in the water does or says a thing. For two years after that, she says, he harassed her.

Do you love her fighting spirit?

There isnt much about Jodie Cooper that I dont love.

You once wrote of a dinner date and mid-sized crush and described her thus: endlessly cheerful, gorgeous, fine dinner companion, raspy voice. Again, lets all gather at your feet while you tell that story.

Having a crush on Jodie Cooper in the 1980s was as daring and radical as thinking Tom Curren had good style. Everyone had a crush on Jodie. For me, Ive always had a thing for girls who look like boys who dress like girls, and that was Jodie all the way. Id talked to her a few times before, probably at the Op Pro, and in Hawaii. She and Pam Burridge and Barton Lynch were my favorite people on tour. Im trying to think, looking back whatever it is, 30-something years, if I thought it was a date-date, and I remember being before nervous beforehand, so I guess I did. Im sure she didnt think so. We went to Mongkut Thai, in downtown San Clemente. Five minutes in I knew it was just a friendly dinner, which was fine, maybe even a relief, and we had a really nice time. I remember her voice, and also that for such a small person she had these big rough country-girl hands.

Jodie swung the door open to the closet in 1997. Do you remember? Do you remember the response to her being gay? Did you tear down your bedroom posters in tears?

She came out in sort of an oblique way, at least as far as the news got to America. Surfing mag called her up for a little one-column interview, and the question was What is the punkest thing about you? and Jodie said something like, My lifestyle, being gay, is pretty punk. Which it was, in surfing terms, back then. It still is.

You lived through the heady eighties and nineties when Jodie was in her competitive prime. What were your impressions of Jodie as a surfer? I think, a little off style-wise and hence no world title maybe, but, when they happened, big turns and wonderful demonstrations of strength.

The women pros of that age were all a little off, style-wise, except maybe Pam. Wendy Botha and Frieda Zamba won all those world titles, and neither of them had a better style then Jodie. Alsoand this wasnt true for Frieda or Wendy or any of the othersthe bigger the surf got, the better Jodie looked, especially at Sunset. I dont think she ever quite hit Margo Obergs level in bigger surf, but pretty close. Jodie loved being out there when it was heavy, and it showed. Shed hang on the North Shore for weeks after all the other girls left. She was never a particularly ambitious world tour competitor but in terms of pushing it in bigger waves, nobody from her generation could touch her. Layne Beachley was the next one, after Jodie, to really charge.

Last I heard, Jodie was working costumes on the movie adaption of the surf novel Breath, nailing that seventies-era perfectly and the taking down Carcass in court. How about you?

Jodie and I wrote a couple letters back and forth, as you did back in the 80s, and that was about it. I left Orange County in 1990 and lost touch with everybody in the surf biz for a couple of years, Jodie included. She did the commentary at a couple of WSL contests recently, Bells or Margarets, or both, and to me she sounded kind of reined in, a little nervous, not much like I rememer her. But it was good to see her onscreen anyway. Jodie seems indomitable in a way, unbreakable, but theres something kind of hard-luck about her too. I dont quite know why. Maybe Im just still pissed on her behalf because that geezer Thompson who assaulted her basically walked, which seemed like a pretty grievous miscarriage of justice.

Read this article:
Oy vey: Zionist surfing website attacked by Jewish foundation, called "despicable, anti-Semitic!" - BeachGrit

Falash Mura aliyah is nothing but election spin – Ynetnews

Posted By on February 16, 2020

The government's recently approved motion to fly some 400 Falash Mura to Israel is a part of a behavior pattern that repeatedly disgraces an entire community.

It is no coincidence this move was approved just three weeks before the March 2 elections. This is a political decision, not a Zionist one.

Falash Mura in Gondar, Ethiopia

(Photo: Nati Markus)

The government has not decided to bring the hundreds waiting in Gondar out of any sincere concern on the part of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his ministers for the deep longing of the Falash Muras' families waiting for them in Israel.

It is based on the patronizing assumption that if the government were to bring 400 Jews right before Election Day all of us, the voters of Ethiopian origin, would flock to vote Likud.

Netanyahu's government had numerous chances to end the travesty that has been going on for too many years purely because of political considerations.

So far, this government had chosen not to follow through on its promises, but now, right before the elections, they suddenly remember that a certain group had been waiting in camps in Gondar for many, many years. Bringing the Falash Mura at this time is nothing less than election spin.

Netanyahu thought to himself defection of that Gadi Yevarkan, an Ethiopian Israeli MK, from Blue & White into his waiting embrace would shift the support of the entire community in favor of Likud. As if the entire community is a herd of sheep who can only be persuaded to vote Likud again if the ruling party includes an Ethiopian politician in its ranks.

Is there anything more patronizing than this?

I don't know whether Netanyahu is fully aware that most of us hold very diverse opinions about Israel's political situation.

Some of us lean to the right, some have left-wing propensities, and some are bang in the center.

Most of us, just like everyone else in Israeli society, are disturbed by rising violence on the streets, the growing poverty that is slowly eroding all that is good about this country, the dismal state of the healthcare system, the precarious security situation in the south.

Here's a little surprise for you, Mr. Netanyahu. Some Ethiopian families even have fierce debates over U.S. President Donald Trump's "Deal of the Century." Amazing, isn't it?

The Ethiopian community is not only concerned about the racism directed at us, the abandonment of Ethiopian Israeli Avera Mengistu to Hamas captivity in the Gaza Strip, the immediate immigration of the Falash Mura or the establishment of a committee to look into how the Police Investigations Department covered up cases of our cruel treatment at the hands of police officers.

Demonstrators protesting the killing of Israeli Ethiopian teen Solomon Tekah by a policeman

(Photo: Reuters)

The government's decision to bring another 400 people will not change our voting patterns. On the contrary - if you thought this group was a Jewish group worthy of immigration to their historic homeland, you would have immediately allowed them to come, just like so many white Jews from around the world do.

This attempt to bribe us right before the elections is an insult to an entire community's intelligence and reveals a very narrow and distorted perspective.

As if we're not sitting around your campfire too and all that bothers us on a daily basis is the Falash Mura immigration, or lack thereof, to Israel.

By the way, bringing the Falash Mura right before the elections was down to former Likud MK Avraham Neguise, who is now at odds with Netanyahu. The incumbent should not give the credit for the move to the defector Yevarkan.

And another thing: At a recent government meeting, it was also decided to establish a commission of inquiry to examine the problematic behavior of the PID.

It is important to note here that this decision is not an attempt to bribe the Ethiopian constituency.

Actually, I'm worried Netanyahu is giving us too many gifts at once. We're not built for that.

Therefore, I wanted to tell him that establishing the commission is a bribe for the Arabs, the disabled and other groups in Israeli society too - because the PID covers up the police's cruel treatment towards them too.

In this instance, the bribe was intended for us, but everyone ended up benefiting from it.

So I guess that's something.

Read more from the original source:
Falash Mura aliyah is nothing but election spin - Ynetnews

Canadians, like New Yorkers, sue their government to force change in yeshivas – Forward

Posted By on February 16, 2020

Read in Yiddish.

For the first time, the Canadian government is getting a taste of what New York City and state have been dealing with for years a trial over a lawsuit accusing it of failing to provide adequate secular education to Hasidic children.

Yohanan Lowen, and his wife Shifra, claim in the lawsuit against the province of Quebec that when Yohanan graduated at age 18, he was unable to read or write in French or English or perform basic arithmetic.

(Shifra Lowen has written for the Forverts).

The plaintiffs finished their high school education without knowing about the St. Lawrence River or the theory of evolution, a summary of the claim reads.

The Lowens filed the lawsuit, which alleges that education authorities did not provide proper oversight of the Hasidic schools he attended in a Montreal suburb, in 2015.

Yohanan was born into the Tash Hasidic community, which among Hasidic Jews has a reputation for extreme insularity, and left in 2010.

The trial began on Monday in Quebec Superior Court. The Lowens are not seeking financial damages. Rather, they are aiming to have the court impose a declaratory judgment, which would force the province to ensure that students of private religious schools receive an education that meets the standards of the provincial curriculum.

The Lowens lawsuit comes amid increasing scrutiny of Hasidic yeshivas in New York State, where some people who have left various Haredi communities have sued the state and the city citing similar reasons as the Lowens. Little has changed in New York, however, as pro-yeshiva groups, yeshiva critics led by YAFFED and state education authorities have spent years arguing over the basic facts of what is taught in Hasidic schools.

On Monday, Marie-Jose Bernier, a youth protection employee, testified that many children in Hasidic schools suffer from educational neglect, lacking basic general knowledge and possessing only rudimentary English and no French at all. A 2014 investigation by Quebecs youth protection services determined that 280 of 320 boys in the Hasidic education system who were examined were developmentally compromised. Some couldnt read a menu or count change.

While the educational issues in New York are strikingly similar, the political situation in Quebec may be more conducive to those seeking to reform Hasidic schools there. Furthermore, the tension between French and English language partisans in Quebec will likely play a role.

Under the previous Liberal government, the province had entered an agreement with some Hasidic schools that saw secular studies taught at home under the supervision of local Anglophone school boards. Those school boards have, however, been dismantled by the new ruling coalition Coalition Avenir Qubec as part of an education overhaul passed on Saturday in part to strengthen the role of French in the provinces education system. With the Anglophone school boards gone, the future of the deal between some yeshivas and Quebec that allowed the schools to not teach secular subjects appears to be in jeopardy.

Bruce Johnston, the Lowens lawyer, argued that Quebec has known for 30 years that some religious schools have been operating illegally but failed to enforce the laws.

Were not saying these people are ill-intentioned, but whatever strategy they had was a failure, Johnston told the court, before asking the judge: By tolerating illegal schools, did the government violate its own law?

Lawyers for the Tash Hasidic community contend that educational standards have improved since the Lowens left the fold.

The trial is expected to last until February 20th.

Read the original post:

Canadians, like New Yorkers, sue their government to force change in yeshivas - Forward

Orthodox Jewish group slams Assembly bill aimed at land preservation – Times Herald-Record

Posted By on February 16, 2020

Jane Anderson Times Herald-Record @JaneAndersonTHR

ThursdayFeb13,2020at6:22PM

This week's passage of a state Assembly bill that would help preserve land in Orange County has raised charges of anti-Hasidim motives from an Orthodox Jewish group.

Named the Orange County Community Preservation Act, the bill adds Orange County to the list of Hudson Valley counties that are eligible to raise funding for community preservation through taxes on property sales. It was sponsored by Assemblywoman Aileen Gunther and passed in the Assembly on Tuesday. Currently, only Putnam County and Westchester County have countywide permission to raise such funds, although there are individual municipalities like the Town of Warwick that have their own permission to do so.

Yossi Gestetner, of the Orthodox Jewish Public Affairs Council (OJPAC), a group with a stated mission of Countering the defamation of the Orthodox Jewish community, says the proposed law targets Jews.

This bill is a direct result of local agitation in Orange County against Hasidim who buy properties, said a tweet posted by OJPAC on the day the bill was passed.

The bill is similar to one that Gov. Andrew Cuomo vetoed in November. That bill, sponsored by Sen. James Skoufis and Assemblyman Colin Schmitt, would have allowed the Town of Chester to collect a 0.75 percent real-estate transfer tax for use in purchasing land or the development rights of land within the town.

In his veto message, Cuomo said he could not approve the PDR legislation because it is mentioned in legislation pending against the town.

Developers of The Greens at Chester, a 431-home development being built on more than 100 acres off Conklingtown Road, filed a 101-page federal complaint July 19, accusing Chester town officials, Orange County, and County Executive Steven Neuhaus of blocking its development in what attorneys argue is an attempt to prevent an influx of Hasidic residents.

In a press release announcing the bill's passage on Tuesday, Schmitt who co-sponsored the bill with about a dozen other Assembly members noted the bill's bipartisan support. He lauded the Assembly's action: This legislation is critical and necessary to protect our open space and farmland and preserve our natural resources.

janderson@th-record.com

Read more:

Orthodox Jewish group slams Assembly bill aimed at land preservation - Times Herald-Record

Transcript: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in Conversation with Bill Moyers – BillMoyers.com

Posted By on February 15, 2020

SERENE JONES: There are few in our community that demonstrate all that Union stands for more than Judith and Bill Moyers. Ten years ago, I remember it very well, Bill Moyers started this lecture series in honor of Judiths 75th birthday. The lecture is one of a kind in that it honors global women leaders who have been deeply shaped by spiritual values and faith.

This evening you all are here and you know that no one better represents this extraordinary legacy than Judith Davidson Moyers. A church-going Texan by birth, Judiths life has been one long extended example of what a woman of spirit does.

Her prestigious awards are too numerous to name. Her work in higher education has been constant and diligent. Her leadership role as the president of Public Affairs Television, the critical role that she played in the programs and documentaries, the voluminous programs and documentaries produced by her and Bill, programs calling us to conscience, exciting moral courage.

Judith, mother and grandmother, were so happy that all three of her children are with us tonight. She is indubitable, a constant source of energy, innovative ideas and vision. She and Bill are recipients of Unions highest award, the Union Medal, and the crowning achievement, as I see it, was her vital service on Unions own board of trustees. Her heart is big. Her mind is brilliant. Her faith is deep and undaunted. And her arms are strong enough to hold the breadth of our humanity. Would you join me in welcoming a true woman of spirit, Judith Davidson Moyers.

JUDITH DAVIDSON MOYERS: Thank you so much. I told Serene just this minute, Thats a little over the top. It has been my pleasure for ten years now to suggest to Serene and the dean and the faculty which of the millions of Women of Spirit we should invite to come to Union. All over the globe, women continue to take action to change the world. Here at Union, especially.

You know, its been generations now where students have combined scholarship and activism. In the past ten years, we have had fabulous women here for this Women of Spirit honor. You have the list. Its in this, and so Im not going to call their names, which breaks my heart, because usually I do, and take time with each one. But youll see. But dont do it right now.

Each of these women has taken action in different spheres. Climate change. The environment. Poverty. Human rights. Labor organizing. Politics. And reform of our criminal justice system. One even by writing Pulitzer Prize-winning novels and essays. That was Marilyn Robinson.

Tonight we are honored to bring you a very special guest to be in conversation with journalist Bill Moyers. You all know Bill. Hes almost 50 years in television, and has 40 Emmy awards, so I dont need to say anymore. I could. Believe me. Weve been married 65 years. Where is he? And I worked with him closely every day for 30 years. And were still married.

My introduction will be brief, because we all want to hear from Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Very few Americans in our history can match the role she has played, does play in our democracy. When she went to the Harvard Law School she was only one of nine women, and there were 500 men. And she had to have her classwork, of course, and she also juggled being a wife and mother. At law school.

She faced resistance from some faculty and administrators, but she became the first female on the Harvard Law Review. Her late husband, Martin Ginsburg, came down with cancer while they were still in law school, and she attended his classes as well as hers and took those notes. And typed those papers. For both of them.

She had to transfer for her final year and came to Columbia Law School. No surprise, she rose to be the top of her class. However, after graduation it wasnt easy for a woman to get a job in a law firm. Youll hear more about that. She did law research and finally she had a faculty position at the Rutgers Law School.

Later she became the first tenured female professor at Columbia Law School. There, while directing the Womens Rights Project of the ACLU, she took six landmark cases on gender equality to the Supreme Court. President Jimmy Carter appointed her to the D.C. Court of Appeals, where she served for 13 years. And in 1993, President Clinton appointed her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. Wow. Only the second woman to take the bench.

Both at the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court she established that there was such a thing as sex discrimination. That had not been established. And, that that violated the Constitution. This changed the landscape of gender-based law.

Throughout her career she has championed the equal citizens stature, constantly reminding all that the Constitution protects the rights of everyone. At the Supreme Court, Justice Ginsburg has also been a force for consensus building, balance and decency.

She has provided a strong voice of dissent from conservative majority opinions, for example, rebuking the majoritys willful demolition, her words, willful demolition of the Voting Rights Act. She continues to inspire us and protect us, and we thank her as a Women of Spirit. Its my honor to welcome Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: Thank you. Please sit down.

BILL MOYERS: And that is just the Republican caucus. Welcome indeed. As you can see, Justice Ginsburg, its a full house here to greet you. The chapel is packed with Union faculty, staff, administration, friends. Guests have come from the Jewish Theological Seminary across the way, and from the religion departments of Barnard and Columbia, your law school alma mater. Still more in the balcony yonder, and in a room you and I cant see, the overflowing room, its overflowing. And many are joining us by streaming. So the Union community has gathered and we thank you very much for coming.

First, a personal note. Two weeks ago, Judith and I were at the Library of Congress. The LBJ Foundation was presenting the Justice with its annual Liberty and Justice Award for All. And they had asked me to do a brief tribute to the Justice, so I spent weeks plunging into her work. The books about her. The biography. Biographies. The most recent and excellent book called Conversations with RBG, which is just out and is a terrific book.

And especially her briefs. I have read briefs in my life, but never as many briefs as I have read in the last three months. And what I discovered in both the dissenting briefs and the affirming briefs is a remarkable style, a remarkable body of prose that is lean and muscular as if itd been in with a first rate trainer for the last 30 years. And that was picturesque and descriptive and insightful. I never enjoyed reading anything legal as much as I did those briefs.

And then I discovered a little known fact about her. Maybe some of you do who know her well personally. But she had studied European literature at Cornell in the 50s with Vladimir Nabokov. And he had obviously had, reportedly had, and substantially had an impact on this unusual, remarkable, visible and particular prose.

So in your spare time, I urge you to get those briefs, Im going to mention a few of then a little later, and read them. They are remarkable literature. So I want to begin by asking you, Justice Ginsburg, what did you take away from that time with Nabokov that you feel definitely shifted your way of writing?

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: We called him Nabokov, the various pronunciations. He was a man who was in love with the sound of words. I think English was his third language. His first language was French and then Russian. And he explained why he liked writing in English better than other languages.

And he gave his example. The white horse. Well, if you say it in French, its le cheval blanc. But when you say cheval, you see a brown horse. You have to adjust your image to make it white. But because we put the adjective first, when the horse comes, its already white.

BILL MOYERS: it true that he influenced your using the phrase "gender discrimination" instead of "sex discrimination," and that you made the change? JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: That change was brought about by my secretary at Columbia Law School. Millicent Tryan (PH) was her name. She said to me one day, Ive been typing these briefs and audibles for you, and the word sex juts out all over. Dont you know that the men you are addressing because the federal bench was then virtually all male. Dont you know that their first association with the word sex is not what you want to be on their minds.

So choose a gender-neutral word, a grammar book term, and that will ward off distracting associations. So I thought that she was so right, and I began to use gender-based discrimination. And the court picked it up too. So now you will see gender used.

BILL MOYERS: Did you ever think of giving up law for a novel? Did you ever think of becoming a novelist after that experience?

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG:I loved the law. I loved the study of law. Unlike many law students, I thoroughly enjoyed my three years in law school. I dont think I have the capacity to be a good novelist. But in the trade, I have been in for goodness knows how many years its hard to believe Ive been on the Supreme Court for 27 years. BILL MOYERS: Right. Do you have in your head how many briefs you have written?

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: How many opinions?

BILL MOYERS: Yes, opinions.

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: Hundreds and hundreds, because before I was on the Supreme Court I was for 13 years on the Court of Appeals for the D.C. circuit. In those 13 years I wrote hundreds of opinions, and on the Supreme Court, I dont have an accurate count of them, but there is a record of how many, and theyre in the hundreds.

Theres an opinion of the court in every case, but then every justice is free to write separately either a concurring opinion, joining in on the majoritys judgment, but for different reasons, or a dissenting opinion. And you perhaps noticed a difference between an opinion that speaks for the court.

At our conferences Ill take careful notes of what my colleagues thought about a case, and if am assigned the opinion, I will try to incorporate other views, because Im writing for the court. But if Im writing a dissent, I dont have to worry about what the others

BILL MOYERS: Right.

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: thought. I have a free hand.

BILL MOYERS: Well, if you had become a novelist, wed have missed some marvelous opinions, and Im so glad I had that chance to read them. But it takes me back to the question why did you become a lawyer?

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: Goes back to my undergraduate days at Cornell University. It was not a great time for our country. It was the heyday of Senator Joseph McCarthy from Wisconsin. There was a tremendous red scare in the country. There was the House UnAmerican Activities Committee and the Senate comparable investigating committee, calling people, many of them in the entertainment business, or writers, having them come before Congress to try to justify why they had belonged to a pink-tinged organization in their youth, in the 1930s, at height of the Depression.

I had a great professor for constitutional law at Cornell. His name was Robert E.Cushman. And he wanted me to be aware that our country was straying from its most basic values. That is the right to think, speak and write as you believe. And not as a big brother government tells you is the right way to think, speak and write.

And he made me aware that there were lawyers standing up for these people, reminding our Congress that we had a First Amendment that guarantees freedom of expression. We have a Fifth Amendment protecting us against self-incrimination.

I drew from that that being a lawyer was a pretty nifty thing to be, because you could earn a living, but you could also do things for which you were not paid that would make conditions a little better in your community. So it was that idea of a lawyer is more than someone who works for a days pay, but someone who has a skill that can help make things a little better.

BILL MOYERS: There runs through your life and your work a deep moral thread. A moral imperative. Where does that come from?

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: Where did it? I dont know in particular where you drew that from, but I have often quoted an expression that Martin Luther King was fond of, and that is that the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice. And I believe that fervently.

Ive seen it in my own lifetime. Things may not be now as we would like them to be, but think of how far we have come. For example, I grew up when World War II was raging, and we were fighting a war against odious racism. And yet, our own troops, until the very end of the war, were rigidly separated

BILL MOYERS: Right.

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: by race. That was wrong, and I think World War II was a major contributor to the Supreme Court eventually ending apartheid in America, with the Brown v. Board decision.

BILL MOYERS: 1954 I believe.

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: Yes.

BILL MOYERS: Yes.

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: In 54. But you think of the way things were, the racial injustice that existed in our country, the confined opportunities open to women. It was the closed door era for women, and I have seen those doors open wide. Ive seen what was once the closed door replaced by a welcome mat. So I am an optimist, because I know that there is the possibility of change if people really care to make it happen.

And thats important, because I never could have done what I did if there hadnt been a groundswell among women in the late 60s and throughout the 70s, wanting to tear down the barriers. Wanting to free both women and men to be you and me. To follow your own talents

BILL MOYERS: Right.

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG:as far as it could take you.

BILL MOYERS: When I ask you that question about that moral imperative, I thought you were perhaps going to come back with something about the Hebrew prophets. And I did my graduate work in theology and church history, and the only courses I came close to flunking were two years of Hebrew. If I hadnt been married to Judith I would never have come out of it.

But I did spend enough time with that to think I heard, in some of your opinions, that cadence of the prophet. That outrage that comes with the sight of injustice. And I found where you said, after you took the oath at the Supreme Court, I am a judge born, raised and proud of being a Jew. The demand for justice runs through the entirety of the Jewish tradition. I hope in my years on the bench of the Supreme Court of the United States I will have the strength and courage to remain constant in the service of that demand. When I read that, I realized that explains the Biblical command on the wall that

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: Justice, justice

BILL MOYERS: was in your chamber. Is it still in your chamber?

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: Its from Deuteronomy. And it says, Justice, justice shall thou pursue, that thou may thrive. Yes. And also what I came away with from my Jewish heritage is a love of learning. Learning is highly prized among Jews. My father came here from Russia when he was 13. He went to night school to learn English. He never had any formal education except Hebrew school in any country.

My mother was the first child in her large family to be born in the U.S.A. Education was tremendously important to them. And I grew up learning to love to read. My fondest memories as a child were sitting on my mothers lap while she read to me. So yes, its the opposition to injustice and wanting to do something about it. Theres a Jewish expression about the obligation to help repair tears in the society in which we live.

BILL MOYERS: I came upon an editorial you wrote in your high school paper, I believe, in which you did an amazing account of the importance of the Magna Carta. Or the ten commandments first. The Magna Carta, the 1681 or 91

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: Bill of Rights.

BILL MOYERS: Bill of Rights in England, the Declaration of Independence, which marked the framework for a new government, and the UN charter that was adopted

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: Yes.

BILL MOYERS: and how did you at that age bring those documents together in whats a brief but remarkable exposition?

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: It was in the eighth grade. World War II had just ended and there was great optimism. There was an organization with a name something like the World Federalists. Everyone was hoping for this one world that would live at peace, and that the rule of law would take over.

It hasnt worked out quite as well as the expectation at the time, but it was very, very hopeful time. And the UN charter was the ideal one world. At peace. Was alive. It didnt take too long before the Iron Curtain came down and we began what endured for so many years.

BILL MOYERS: But you were optimistic, despite the fact that you were born in the midst of the Depression. You were born in 33.

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: Yes.

BILL MOYERS: I was born in 34. Judith was born in 35. So weve got between us 250-some odd years. And it was after the Depression and after World War II. I think both us were quite optimistic then, even though we were too young to know what optimism was. But we were hopeful about the future.

But something else I almost brought it tonight and I thought it would take too long. So that was in the eighth grade. Was it in high school then you came upon that writing by Anne Frank in which she and Id never seen this before. I read her diary. Seen the documentaries. But she talks about the plight of women.

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: Yes.

BILL MOYERS: And why women are taking the subordination to men. She said its stupid.

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: Yes.

BILL MOYERS: She says, Its stupid. And she says, I can only explain it by the fact that, well, men are more physical, men do the work and men can do as they please, or something like that. And then she says, I just hope women will wake up one day and realize whats been done to them, and do something about it.

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: Yes. And she was 15 years old.

BILL MOYERS: Fifteen years old. Where did you find that?

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: Its in the diary toward the end. It was one of the last entries before she was sent off to I think Bergen-Belsen, where she died, I think about a month short of her 16th birthday.

BILL MOYERS: Can you remember what you thought when you read that about women in Anne Franks diary?

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: I dont remember the first time I encountered it, because I read the diaries a few times. But it was a real eye-opener. I knew that these situations, these conditions existed, but I thought, Well, thats just the way it is. Theres not much you can do about it. Youll have to cope with it. But thats a remarkable entry in her diary.

BILL MOYERS: Right.

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: And she mentioned some progress too. She said, In some countries theyve been given equal rights.

BILL MOYERS: Things were better. Right. For women. Who were your role models when you were a young girl? I know one was your mother, Celia.

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: I had a fictional role model and a real one. Youre right that my mother was a constant encourager, telling me, Be independent, whatever else you do. It would be nice if you met and married Prince Charming, but be prepared to fend for yourself.

The fictional heroine was Nancy Drew, because most books for children at that time were of the Jane and Jack variety, where Jack was running and doing all kinds of fun things, and Jane or Jill was sitting in a pretty pink party dress. But Nancy Drew was a doer. She was leading around her boyfriend. She had adventures. She solved mysteries.

The real woman who was a heroine for me was Amelia Earhart. I cant say that I had women judges as a model, except for Deborah in the Bible, because women werent on the bench. I mean even when I started law school women were only 3 percent of the lawyers across the country. I think young women today have many women who inspire them. Theres no closed doors for women anymore. Women can be admirals. They can be chief judges. So it was Nancy Drew and Amelia Earhart.

BILL MOYERS: What about the Greek deities?

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: Oh yes. My mother took me on weekly trips to the library. And while she got her hair done, I would pick out the five books Id take home. And Greek mythology I loved. My closest friend growing up was Catholic, and she had all these saints and I had nothing but this one God. So thats when I became a lover of Greek mythology.

BILL MOYERS: Athena in particular, I believe.

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: Oh, Pallas Athena, who gave her father a headache.

BILL MOYERS: She is said to have been I was struck by this when I came across it, because when I was about that age, growing up in a small town in east Texas, walking down East Burleson Street. They had just opened the new, small library built by the Business and Professional Women there, our first real external library outside of the courthouse.

And I went in and I picked out two books to take home. First books that Id ever had. One was Jules Vernes Around the World in 80 Days, and the other was a book of Greek heroes. And about the same time you were reading about Athena, I was reading about the males who were often the object of their wrath.

So we have that in common. That framed an issue with me. Jules Verne enhanced my desire to be a journalist, because hed travel the world and did it on somebody elses expense account. And I liked that. But Athena was said to have established the rule of law when she

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: Yes.

BILL MOYERS: tried Orestes? Right?

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: Yes.

BILL MOYERS: For the murder of her for the murder oher mother, who had killed his father.

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: Yes.

BILL MOYERS: And so she was said to have put down the first frame for the rule of justice.

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: Yes.

BILL MOYERS: And I wondered if you saw something in the future for you because of that?

JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG: I did not dream

BILL MOYERS: Okay.

See the rest here:

Transcript: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in Conversation with Bill Moyers - BillMoyers.com

Review – Tom Stoppard’s Leopoldstadt at the Wyndham’s Theatre – LondonTheatre.co.uk

Posted By on February 15, 2020

The last new Tom Stoppard play to open directly in the West End was Indian Ink -itself based on an earlier radio play - which premiered at the Aldwych Theatre twenty-five years ago. All of his plays since then have mostly been seen first at the National, including the three-part The Coast of Utopia, Arcadia and The Invention of Love (the latter pair of which then transferred to the West End), with one other play Rock 'n' Roll originating at the Royal Court in 2005 (though its West End transfer was already announced before it even opened there).

So the first striking thing about Leopoldstadt is that it has dared to open, under the auspices of London's most prolific producer Sonia Friedman, directly into the West End, where it is booking through mid-June (and can't be extended as Life of Pi is already booked in to follow it, transferring from Sheffield, later that month). It is the sixth collaboration between Friedman and Stoppard, including the West End and Broadway transfers of the Menier's revival of Travesties.

The second thing is its sheer scale and scope: it's nothing less than an epic portrait of a Jewish family's lives across multiple generations of the first half of the last troubled century, beginning in 1899 and ending in 1955, performed by a company of some 41 actors (26 adults, 15 children).

But even more significant than either of these factors is that it marks both a probable end-point in its playwright's career, but also a uniquely personal one that brings out new reservoirs of sadness in a writer whose work is usually populated by more intellectual thought and verbal gymnastics than actual feeling. In a Radio 4 interview ahead of the opening, the 82-year-old writer stated it would likely to be his last play: "I am slowing up. This one took longer to write. And the other thing is, what on earth can you write about after that? When I finished Leopoldstadt I thought, 'I cant go through all that again.' Four years tend to go by between my plays, so I will be 86 or 87 before I write another, and I wondered whether people who are 87 do have plays on."

In an extended programme note, adapted from a 1999 piece that was published in talk magazine, Stoppard discusses finding out about his own Jewish heritage, after he was born to a secular family in Czechoslovakia in 1937, but which he didn't really find out the facts of until the mid-90s.

As someone who only discovered my own Jewish heritage (on my mother's side) less than 20 years ago, when I was already well into my 30s, Stoppard and I have something in common; and his play even identifies a label that would have applied to my matriarchal grandmother: "There were a few thousand who never left, living below the surface with a gentile husband or wife. U-boats, they were called", explains one character to another. The only difference between the characters in this play and my mother's background is that my mother was born and raised in Nazi-occupied Lodz in Poland, not Vienna in Austria where the play is set.

So the play struck a raw cord of emotion in me. But I defy anyone not to be intensely moved by the play as it moves to its conclusion, and the painful and enduring legacy of the Holocaust (which I won't spoil by revealing how it is shown here).

It would also be fair to say that, until then, the play is a bit of a slow-burn, heavy on exposition as it introduces its canvas of characters, and their backgrounds and relationships to each other. Some of this is quite hard going -there is, naturally, a typically Stoppardian diversion into the dubious joys of explaining mathematical theory - but there's also a generous helping of Jewish history and traditions to embrace, too, like the symbolic power of a Passover seder.

It's when the play personalises this that it is at its most potent and effective. It is played and staged with a glowing warmth throughout, with lovely and loving ensemble character work on display across the board, with particularly moving work from Sebastian Armesto and Luke Thallon, Adrian Scarborough and (amplifying the personal connection) Ed Stoppard, the playwright's own actor son, in a leading role.

This is a powerful, important new play from one of our greatest living playwrights that, should it prove to be his swansong, means he has gone out on a significant high, even as he dramatises a low point on world history.

Leopoldstadtis at the Wyndham's Theatreuntil 13th June.

Leopoldstadttickets are available now.

Original post:

Review - Tom Stoppard's Leopoldstadt at the Wyndham's Theatre - LondonTheatre.co.uk

Tel Aviv professor becomes first woman to receive Israel Prize in Talmudic studies – Cleveland Jewish News

Posted By on February 15, 2020

Professor Vered Noam, head of the Chaim Rosenberg School of Jewish Studies and Archaeology at Tel Aviv University, has become the first woman to be awarded the annual Israel Prize for Talmudic studies, it was announced on Monday.

The prize jury, headed by Rabbi Daniel Sperber, a professor of Talmud at Bar-Ilan University in Ramat Gan, described Noam as an internationally renowned scholar.

He added, the importance of her research is widely recognized. In particular, she is a role model for her contribution to the scientific community and the public in general, for making rabbinic and Talmudic literature accessible to all students in Israel.

Born in Jerusalem to childrens author Rivka Elitzur and Bible scholar Professor Yehuda Elitzur, Noam earned her undergraduate and graduate degrees in Talmud from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. She has been working in the Talmud department of Tel Aviv University since 1999, and since 2017 has headed the School of Jewish Studies and Archaeology.

She was a visiting professor at Yale University and also headed the beit midrash (Jewish study hall) at Midreshet Lindenbaum in Jerusalemone of the first Orthodox Jewish-study programs for women.

The prize jury added: She was and continues to be a source of inspiration for an entire generation of women who study Torah in academia and in the world of midrashot [advanced Torah academies] for women in Israel and the world.

Noam said on Tuesday that in our world, Jewish women have a right and a duty to be part of the multigenerational conversation of the Jewish people, and to belong to study and Torah.

The awards ceremony will take place on April 29, Israels Independence Day.

The post Tel Aviv professor becomes first woman to receive Israel Prize in Talmudic studies appeared first on JNS.org.

Original post:

Tel Aviv professor becomes first woman to receive Israel Prize in Talmudic studies - Cleveland Jewish News

YITRO: Lessons from the Altar keep moving forward – The Jewish News of Northern California

Posted By on February 15, 2020

TheTorah columnis supported by a generous donation from Eve Gordon-Ramek.YitroExodus 18:120:23

This weeks Torah portion is central to the theology of the Jewish people.

The Ten Commandments are universally known as the basis for our Western values. The revelation that takes place at Mount Sinai is a unique experience that distinguishes the Jewish people from all others.

In fact, Moses himself challenges us in Deuteronomy (4:33-34) to ask of the days before you and from one end of heaven to the other end of heaven, has there ever been a thing as great as this, or has anything like it been heard? Has any people heard the voice of a god speaking out of a fire, as you have, and lived?

Even Moses himself states that this a unique claim of the Jewish people.

The description of the experience is something that transcends our normal senses. The Talmud states that we were there as one man with one heart (Shabbat 86b). There was incredible unity and clarity for the entire people.

The Sinai experience is something that is so central to our theology that we are all supposed to see ourselves as if we were actually there.

At the end of the parashah, there is an epilogue that is intriguing. God tells Moses (Exodus 20:19-23) to tell the people this: Now that theyve seen that He has spoken to them from the heavens, they must not make any images of gods of silver and gold. They should make an altar filled with earth upon which to bring offerings. When they are to build an altar of stones, they cannot build them hewn, lest they wave their sword over it and desecrate it. The final commandment is not to ascend to the altar using steps so that ones nakedness is not uncovered.

All of the commandments, or mitzvot, in the Torah are important, but it is certainly curious that these would follow such a dramatic event as the national revelation.

At the very least, in the Ten Commandments themselves, we are told that we should not make graven images. Why would it need to be repeated immediately following the great event?

Perhaps in our contemporary world we have an easy way to relate to what might be concerning God at this very moment. When something exciting happens to us today, we are all very fast to capture it with our cell phones. We all have cameras on us and we are quick to try to make sure that we can preserve, or at least share, the memory.

Making an image of silver or gold was the way that the Jewish people could preserve the experience.

The danger, however, was that those images could become so important that they could end up replacing the actual relationship that they all had with God Himself. Seems like a poignant lesson for us today, as well.

The altar of earth reminds us that even though we are trying to reach spiritual heights through offerings to God, we have to make sure that we are grounded at the same time.

The prohibition against hewn stone also sends us a powerful message. The way that we serve God should not be one of war and weapons. A sword should not be used in building an altar. At the most intense and intimate moment between God and the Jewish people, these mitzvot remind us to maintain a proper perspective.

Finally, we come to the forbidden steps.

The altar that is instructed to be built in the coming weeks parashah is accompanied by a ramp. In a world before the American Disabilities Act, why would it be so important to make sure that we have a ramp and not steps?

A visiting student from Yeshiva University who spoke at Congregation Emek Beracha in Palo Alto pointed out that there are some clear differences between steps and a ramp that might shed light on this passage.

In order to climb steps, one must first reach their leg to at least the height of the next step. With a ramp, any incremental step upward can move someone forward. With steps, one can stop and stand still for a long time because each step is a flat surface. The same is not true with a ramp. If one stops to stand, their ankles will give out. They have to keep moving forward.

When it comes to ones spiritual growth, we try to emulate the messages of the ramp.

Keep moving forward, even in slight increments. If one tries to stop because they feel they have achieved their own personal spiritual goals, they should be warned that they are destined to slide backward.

It is at the very moment when the Jewish people reach their apex of spirituality that the Torah needs to remind them of the subtleties of achieving proper spiritual growth. Enjoy the moment without the need to capture it with images. Stay grounded and avoid using weapons in the name of service to God.

Finally make sure that you are constantly moving forward and upward, regardless of how small your steps may be.

Shabbat Shalom.

Excerpt from:

YITRO: Lessons from the Altar keep moving forward - The Jewish News of Northern California

TruNews: Zionism Is Using the Transgender Rights Movement to Make All of Humanity Androgynous – Right Wing Watch

Posted By on February 15, 2020

End Times broadcaster Rick Wiles is not only a virulent anti-Semite but also a radical conspiracy theorist, and those two obsessions merged on Wednesday nights edition of his TruNews program, which resulted in some pretty wild claims being made.

Featured on the program were Messianic Jews Steve and Jana Ben-Nun of Israeli News Live, who claimed that the transgender rights movement is a Zionist plot to make all of humanity androgynous.

They want to rule the world, Jana Ben-Nun said of the Jews. They want to get Gentile riches, and they want to rule the Gentiles. They dont consider Gentiles [to be] fully human beings. In fact, as an end game, they have this strange doctrine: the Adam Kadmon doctrine. Adam Kadmon was, originally, according to the Zohar and the Talmud, he was androgynous; Adam, he wasnt male or female, he was male and female in one body, and this is why you see this transgender agenda today.

Is Zionism behind the transgender movement? Wiles asked.

Yes, Ben-Nun replied. It gets its origin in Zionism, and it gets its origin in the Talmud, Zohar, and Kabbalah. Its a Kabbalahistic doctrine of Adam Kadmon. They have this doctrine called Tikkun Olamrepairing the worldso how do they want to repair the world? They want to bring it to the original. Who was original? Adam. He was androgynous. So now theyre putting specific things in food, in drink, and basically their end game is to make humans on Earth that will survivewhatever it is they are bringingandrogynous.

What they are really trying to do is undo Gods creation, Wiles said. They are at odds with the Creator.

Go here to read the rest:

TruNews: Zionism Is Using the Transgender Rights Movement to Make All of Humanity Androgynous - Right Wing Watch


Page 1,216«..1020..1,2151,2161,2171,218..1,2301,240..»

matomo tracker