Page 1,288«..1020..1,2871,2881,2891,290..1,3001,310..»

Blue and White party liberal Zionist heroes refused to cut deal with Palestinian legislators – Mondoweiss

Posted By on December 23, 2019

One of the idealistic hopes that arose during the recent Israeli political wrangling was the possibility that centrist Benny Gantz would end the Netanyahu era by forming a minority government of 44 Jewish members of Knesset on the center-left with the outside support of legislators who would keep the government from being voted out. The outside bloc was ten or more Palestinian members of Knesset and eight seats held by rightwinger Avigdor Lieberman.

The Palestinian political leader Ayman Odeh implored Gantz to rise to the moment and make such a coalition, based on the idea of equality of Palestinians and Jews. In a stirring speech at J Street in October, Odeh explained that this was what Yitzhak Rabin had done in 1993: formed a governing coalition with the outside support of Palestinian parties, and it had allowed him to pursue the peace process.

Rabin led a minority government supported from the outside by the Arab and Arab Jewish parties Without [Palestinian leader Tawfik] Ziad there would have been no Rabin coalition, no negotiations, and no peace process. This is a time for bravery once again I am calling on Benny Gantz. Be brave like Rabin was in 1993 and it would be my honor to be brave like Tawfik Ziad. In the words of the great America poet Lin Manuel Miranda, history has its eyes on us. Our demand is nothing more and nothing less than a basic agenda for equality.

Odehs hope soon died. Gantz failed to form any kind of coalition, including a minority one. As the New York Timesand other media told us, it was because Avigdor Lieberman refused to have anything to do with Palestinians, labeling them a fifth column, and Gantz needed Liebermans eight seats.

Well, not really.

Yesterday I was shocked to learn something I should have known weeks ago: The reason the possibility of a minority government led by Benny Gantz in Israel did not go forward was that members of his own centrist party refused to sit with Palestinians.

Evan Gottesman and Eli Kowaz discussed the minority government idea on the Israel Policy Forum podcast (Dec. 12th):

Gottesman: It didnt seem like it was torpedoed by Lieberman even though in the public reaction to it, Lieberman had to take the role of saying, You know I would never sit with the Arabs, and taking on his typical bellicose stance. But it looked like that sort of initiative was actually most controversial within Kahol Lavan [Blue and White] itself, that there were some of the rightwing MKs within Kahol Lavan opposed to a narrow minority government that would be supported from the outside by the Joint List.

Kowaz: So from my understanding, it didnt even get to the point of inviting Avigdor Lieberman to be part of that government because of what you just noted about the Kahol Lavan MKs talking about, on the right. Kahol Lavanencompasses a lot of different political viewpoints.

Gottesman: That was Zvi Hauser and Yoaz Hendel I believe.

Kowaz: Exactly. Those are members of Bogie Yaalons Telem faction in Kahol Lavan.

This important point has not come out in the American press. The New York Times has repeatedly sanitized it. (Marc Schulman of Newsweek acknowledged it in passing but gave equal blame to Lieberman.)

You can find this point in the Israeli press, but over there, racism is ho-hum news. Gantz was reported last month to be angry at the racists. Because of Yoaz Hendel and Tzvika Hauser, Im not Prime Minister, he said.

But no problem. Gantz is now keeping the two men on his Blue and White list for the March elections. Even though Yoaz Hendel explicitly opposed Palestinian political participation, per the Israeli press last summer:

Blue and White will establish a broad and state-oriented nationalist unity government, Hendel said. We respect the Arab citizens of Israel and see them as citizens entitled to all rights, but we will not sit with the Arab parties, which fundamentally deny the existence of Israel as a Jewish state. Period.

The issue here is American liberals, our liberal press and liberal Zionists. Benny Gantz is a hero to liberal Zionists. They see him as the man who can take down Netanyahu. An Opening for Hope, the New Israel Fund said of Gantz getting the opportunity to form a government just last month.

[S]omething is changing for the better in Israel.

If Israels Jewish electorate said anything clearly, it was a clear no to Jewish extremists who incite against Arab citizens. And Israels Arabs citizens turned out in large numbers to vote for the Joint List, a party that the first time in a quarter century has reached out to Jewish parties to build political partnership.

Now look why that didnt happen. Because of racism inside the Blue and White Party. Liberal Americans who are connected to Israel ought to be denouncing this racism and putting pressure on Gantz to purge open racists from his party. Its not happening. Kowaz and Gottesman of Israel Policy Forum dont seem to regard this news as problematic. No, once again Israeli political culture has revealed itself to be deeply racist; and American friends of Israel walk on by.

Read the original:
Blue and White party liberal Zionist heroes refused to cut deal with Palestinian legislators - Mondoweiss

Trump’s Executive Order on Combating Anti-Semitism: Why the Ruckus? – Aish

Posted By on December 23, 2019

Applying Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to Jews is not new. It's the adoption of the IHRA Definition of Anti-Semitism thats causing all the commotion.

Is it anti-Semitism to support the destruction of the one and only Jewish nation-state home to approximately half of the Jews in the world today? Is it anti-Semitism to say that Jews do not have a right to self-determination that Jews have no right to exercise sovereignty within any borders in their ancestral homeland, the Land of Israel?

This question lies at the heart of todays debate over anti-Semitism.

When U.S. President Donald Trump signed the Executive Order on Combating Anti-Semitism last week, he answered this question in the affirmative by incorporating the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) Definition of Antisemitism, which includes as a contemporary example of anti-Semitism [d]enying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.

Applying Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to Jews, as the Executive Order does, is not new. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color and national origin in programs and activities that receive federal funding. National origin discrimination has been interpreted for years to include discrimination against those who have shared ancestry or ethnicity. In this way, Title VI protects religious groups such as Jews, Sikhs and Muslims. That part of the Executive Order was not new. What is new is that the Executive Order requires all executive branch agencies and departments charged with enforcing Title VI (not just the U.S. Department of Education) to apply the IHRA Definition of Anti-Semitism when determining whether unlawful conduct has been motivated by discriminatory intent. It is the adoption of this definition of anti-Semitism that is causing the ruckus.

It is important to note that there is nothing in either the IHRA Definition or the Executive Order that precludes anyone from criticizing the policies of the government of Israel. In fact, the IHRA definition explicitly states that criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic. So why are some individuals opposed to this definition? Because it makes clear that opposing Israels existence as a Jewish homeland is anti-Semitism. Those who oppose Israels right to exist as a Jewish nation-state condemn the Executive Orders adoption of the IHRA definition because it labels their position anti-Semitic. Anti-Semites dont like to be called anti-Semites.

It is not unlawful in the United States to make racist or anti-Jewish comments. In America, the First Amendment protects your right to express yourself as a bigot. Nothing in the Executive Order changes that fact. But the First Amendment does not insulate and prevent those who make racist or anti-Semitic comments from being labeled as racists and anti-Semites. By incorporating the IHRA definition, the Executive Order delineates what constitutes anti-Semitism so that it can be recognized, labeled and condemned.

Those who believe that the Jews have a right to self-determination in some borders in the Land of Israel do not have to agree with the policies of the Government of Israel. There are Jews in Israel and around the globe who support the right of a Jewish nation-state, but who do not support some or all of the policies of the current government. Criticizing those policies is not anti-Semitic. What is anti-Semitic, according to the IHRA Definition, is claiming that there is no right to a Jewish state within any borders.

Denying the right of Jewish self-determination is tantamount to supporting the destruction of the worlds only Jewish nation-state. It means supporting the destruction of the safety net for Jews who are persecuted around the globe. And it demands that Jews shed what many consider a key component of their Jewish identity namely, the yearning and determination of the Jews to return to Zion (Jerusalem) and to re-establish Jewish sovereignty in their ancestral homeland. Those who support self-determination for other groups (like the Palestinians, the Kurds or the Tibetans), but deny the right to Jewish self-determination apply a double standard to the Jews is anti-Semitism.

Zionism the yearning and desire of Jews to exercise their right to self-determination and to re-establish a Jewish homeland in the Land of Israel is an inherent part of the Jews shared ancestry and ethnicity. Zionism as the political movement of the Jewish people may have originated in the 19th century, but the determination to return to Zion, is as old as Abraham and the Bible. To be a Zionist means to support the right of Jewish self-determination. Those who oppose Zionism deny Jews this right. Judea Pearl, father of the late journalist Daniel Pearl, coined a term for this. He calls it Zionophobia an irrational fear or hatred of a homeland for the Jewish people. The IHRA definition recognizes that Zionophobia denying this fundamental core Jewish belief is anti-Semitism.

Not all Jews are Zionists, just as not all Jews observe the Sabbath or adhere to kosher dietary rules. However, just as it is anti-Semitic to attack, harass or discriminate against Jews on the basis of their Sabbath or kashrut observance, so, too, is it anti-Semitic to attack, harass or marginalize Jews who advocate, express or support the Zionist part of their Jewish identity.

To combat anti-Semitism effectively, we must recognize that it targets all Jews. It doesnt matter how one identifies Ashkenazi, Sephardi, Mizrahi, Conservative, Orthodox, Reform, Chassidic, haredi, Chiloni, Zionist or non-Zionist. If a Jew is targeted because he or she expresses a component of his or her identity as a Jew, that is anti-Semitism. By incorporating the IHRA definition, the Executive Order does not define all Jews as Zionists. It merely recognizes that Jews (including students on college campuses) who view Zionism as a key component of their identity as Jews may not be harassed and demonized for expressing or supporting that part of their ethnic and religious identity.

On university campuses, anti-Zionist activity has moved well beyond speech. Today, students who express support for Israels existence as the Jewish homeland are boycotted, harassed, demonized, excluded and pushed to the periphery. It makes no difference whether or not these students support the policies of the current government of Israel. If they express support for the Jewish nation-state at all, they are treated by anti-Israel groups as the enemy, and are forced to closet their Zionism and often their Judaism in order to be accepted as full members of the college community. Students report being afraid to wear items that distinguish them as Jewish, including kipahs, Stars of David and even T-shirts with Hebrew letters, because such items render them targets for abuse.

University administrators have repeatedly failed to address this problem adequately, primarily because they have not understood when and how anti-Zionism becomes anti-Semitism. Equally importantly, administrators have not appreciated that failure to protect students who express the Zionist part of their Jewish identity from persistent and pervasive harassment and discrimination will subject the universities to legal liability under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Trumps Executive Order made both of these points abundantly clear. It clarified for universities that, as the IHRA definition provides, the following are some contemporary examples of anti-Semitism:

Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.

Applying double standards by requiring of [Israel] a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.

Using the symbols and images associated with classic anti-Semitism to characterize Israel or Israelis.

Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.

Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the State of Israel.

Recognizing these as examples of anti-Semitism does not make expression of these views unlawful. Trumps Executive Order does not bar students or professors from expressing these perspectives, and it certainly does not prevent students or professors from engaging in constructive, challenging dialogue regarding the policies of the current government of Israel.

However, the Executive Order puts universities on notice that they must treat this type of anti-Semitism the same way they treat racism or other forms of discrimination. Universities must call out and condemn as anti-Semitic the persistent and pervasive demonization of Zionists, just as they would call out and condemn persistent and pervasive anti-black, anti-Hispanic or anti-Muslim rhetoric. When anti-Semitic rhetoric is ignored, it escalates into anti-Semitic conduct. Universities, therefore, must act to prevent the creation of a hostile environment on campus. Failure to protect students will, according to Trumps Executive Order, result in legal liability and could cause the U.S. Department of Education to withhold federal funding from the offending institution of higher learning.

As anti-Semitism around the globe continues to rise, it is imperative that society define it. If we cannot define it, we will never be able to recognize and effectively combat it. Trumps measure took a bold and necessary first step by prescribing a domestic definition for U.S. federal agencies. Now we must utilize this definition to combat anti-Semitism in all its forms and from all sides of the spectrum in academia, in politics, in the media, in places of worship, online and in our own communities.

Read more here:
Trump's Executive Order on Combating Anti-Semitism: Why the Ruckus? - Aish

Rebellion in Habayit Hayehudi over Union with Otzma Yehudit – The Jewish Press – JewishPress.com

Posted By on December 23, 2019

Photo Credit: Yonatan Sindel/Flash90

The Liberal wing of Habayit Hayehudi opposes the deal between their party leader, Education Minister Rabbi Rafi Peretz, and Otzma Yehudit led by Itamar Ben-Gvir, Srugim reported Saturday night. In response, Habayit Hayehudi members are collecting signatures to protest the move and demand it be cancelled. If not, they say, they would convene the partys central members, and demand to hold primaries.

In the petition, the opposition against Peretz within Habayit Hayehudi claims that that the Otzma deal was made behind MK Moti Yogevs back, who was updated about it only a few minutes before the signing. They also accuse Peretz of being a one-man party, concerned only with keeping his Knesset seat.

Following the Saturday night meeting of the Habayit Hayehudi opposition, on Sunday they sent a letter to Rabbi Peretz signed by 30 deputy mayors and municipal council members, laying out their conditions for the implementation of his agreement.

The opponents demanded to negotiate with Transport Minister Bezalel Smotrichs National Union party, arguing that this [party] is our sister, it wouldnt be right without them. They also called for the ratification of the Otzma agreement by the Habayit Hayehudi central committee in time, and not delay it and then use the pretext that there is no time to debate it. Finally, they called for primaries to decide the next party chairman.

Meanwhile, Army Radio reported Sunday that Smotrich approached New Right co-leader Ayelet Shaked saying he would prefer to run with her party in the March 2 elections rather than with Habayit Hayehudi. Kipa suggested this was Smotrichs response to being snubbed by Peretz and Ben-Gvir, who started their honeymoon behind his back, too. The Smotrich camp has denied this allegation.

A Smotrich Shaked Bennett front could siphon the Religious Zionist vote from Habayit Hayehudi and Otzma, pushing them into the precipice below the 3.25% vote threshold. However, just as Smotrich and the Liberal faction in Habayit Hayehudi are leery of a run with the Kahane tainted Otzma Yehudit, so are Bennett and Shaked leery of running alongside a zealous religious Zionist such as Smotrich.

For a deeper understanding of these entangled relationships we recommend reading Jean-Paul Sartre 1944 existentialist play No Exit.

In the very recent past (feels like only a few hours ago), Smotrich and Shaked were considered close associates and even collaborated to promote aggregate primaries of all the religious Zionist forces. Peretz objected because he feared he was in the unique position to score very low in such a vote, well behind his more charismatic competitors.

Last Wednesday, Smotrich called for those inclusive religious Zionist primaries according to the following principles: True unity, no temporary zipper connections but a full and true connection here and now; let the voters choose the leaders, not the party insiders; and opening the door to anyone who identifies with the way and values of religious Zionism, while closing the doors set up by politicians who cynically exploit bylaws and mechanisms to get their way.

At least for the moment, Rabbi Rafi Peretz seems to have decided to turn his back on these principles and prefers a fast electoral solution in his union with Itamar Ben-Gvir.

Original post:
Rebellion in Habayit Hayehudi over Union with Otzma Yehudit - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com

Israel Alone Is Willing to Use Force to Check Iran – Mosaic

Posted By on December 23, 2019

To safeguard its interests, protect its allies, and prevent a resurgence of Islamic State, the United States must contain the Islamic Republics expansionism, and to do so, argues Reuel Marc Gerecht, Washington must focus its attention on Syria. In the words of the former commander of Iranian forces in Syria, the country as the key region to Iranian strategy, where Tehrans interests can most be hurt. But if the U.S. refuses to take action, it will leave Israel alone to stand up to the ayatollahs:

[T]o ensure that the clerical regime cannot exploit Iraqs highway system to move soldiers and materiel, including medium-range missiles, easily into the Levant, Syria is the choke point; . . . if Tehran can develop medium-range missile bases and permanently deploy a significant ground force in Syria, all protected by advanced Russian air-defense systems, then it may be able to check Israels capacity to play a Middle Eastern cop, which is the role the Obama and Trump administrations have defaulted onto the Jewish state as Washington has thinned its objectives and responsibilities in the region.

With Trumps decision not to respond militarily to Iranian attacks against shipping in the Persian Gulf and a critical Saudi oil facility, the president has seriously undermined the fear that others have had of American power. If Washington is unwilling to risk war to thwart the clerical regimes ambitions, then the only real hard-power check on Tehran is Jerusalem.

And surrounded by ever-better missiles in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Iran, Israel naturally would hesitate to strike the Islamic Republic. Even with the Iron Dome anti-missile shield, civilian casualties might be staggering, . . . And the possibility of an Israeli military check against the ongoing Iranian nuclear-weapons quest will diminish appreciably. The Israelis might still make an effort to take out the clerical regimes primary nuclear facilities, given Jerusalems existential fear of an Iranian nuke, but the Islamic Republic would have an increasing advantage: the more ballistic and cruise missiles Tehran can deploy, the more tempting it becomes for any Israeli cabinet to just live with a doctrine of mutually assured destruction.

Read more at Caravan

More about: Iran, Israeli Security, Syrian civil war, U.S. Foreign policy

Read the original post:
Israel Alone Is Willing to Use Force to Check Iran - Mosaic

Hamas: Attempts to Normalize of Ties with Zionist Regime Treasonous – IQNA (International Quran News Agency)

Posted By on December 23, 2019

TEHRAN (IQNA) A spokesman for the Palestinian resistance movement Hamas has condemned attempts aimed at normalizing diplomatic relations between some Arab countries with the Israeli regime, describing such behavior as treason.

In a press release on Sunday, Abdul-Latif al-Qanua said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahus move to welcome Tel Avivs warming relations with Arab countries was a reflection of how deep these ties have gone, and the level some Arab regimes have sunk to.

He warned that the normalization of Arab states' ties with the Israeli regime would harm the Palestinian cause, Press TV reported.

He stressed the importance of supporting the Palestinian people through prosecuting the Israeli war criminals at the International Criminal Court (ICC) instead of establishing new relations with "an illegal entity."

The UAE minister of foreign affairs and international cooperation on Saturday tweeted an article supporting an alliance between Arab countries and Israel. The posting received an immediate welcome from the Israeli prime minister.

In the post on his official Twitter account, Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan tweeted a link to a story in The Spectator, a weekly British magazine, titled Islams reformation: an Arab-Israeli alliance is taking shape in the Middle East.

Netanyahu responded to the top Emirati diplomat, welcoming close relations between Israel and Arab countries in the region.

I welcome the closer relations between Israel and many Arab states. The time has come for normalization and peace, he tweeted.

Meanwhile, Israeli authorities have said that the regime's officials are apparently injecting more momentum into their efforts to bring out in the open their clandestine relations with a number of Arab countries, particularly Persian Gulf littoral states.

According to Israeli officials, who have been quoted by AFP as saying, they are also hoping to reach out to Arab peoples through participation in the Expo 2020 Dubai, which the biggest and most luxurious city of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) is going to host for 173 days.

Israel has full diplomatic ties with only two Arab states, Egypt and Jordan, but latest reports suggest Tel Aviv has been working behind the scenes to establish formal contacts with other Arab countries such as the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Bahrain.

In August, Israeli foreign minister Israel Katz said he was working toward transparent normalization and signed agreements with a number of Persian Gulf littoral states as the countries do not shy away from disclosing their clandestine relations with Tel Aviv following years of secretive contacts.

Netanyahu in late November last year visited Oman, where he met Sultan Sayyid Qaboos at the Bait al-Barakah Royal Palace in the coastal city of Seeb near the capital Muscat.

In October 2018, Israels culture and sports minister Miri Regev traveled to the UAE for the Abu Dhabi Grand Slam judo tournament, where the regimes anthem was played for the first time.

During the visit, she also toured Abu Dhabis Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque accompanied by Emirati officials.

Read the original here:
Hamas: Attempts to Normalize of Ties with Zionist Regime Treasonous - IQNA (International Quran News Agency)

Shaked: Relationship with Bennett is ‘excellent’ – Arutz Sheva

Posted By on December 23, 2019

MK Ayelet Shaked (New Right) on Saturday night appeared on Israel's "Meet the Press" program.

Clarifying that her relationship with Defense Minister Naftali Bennett (New Right) is "excellent" and there is "mutual respect and compromise" despite the silence over the past week, Shaked expressed dismay over the fact that "for one week I'm quiet, and there's a commotion."

She also said that she believed it was better to hold large-scale primaries for Religious Zionism, in which each person could apply to run, but unfortunately that did not happen.

Regarding her party's achievement in September's elections, Shaked said, "Seven Knesset seats is a nice achievement, but it's not good enough. We think that right now, running in two parties, one which represents the liberal right-wing and the other which represents the religious aspect of Religious Zionism, is a process which can lead to a right-wing government with 61 Knesset seats."

"In the coming week, we will do a lot of things to bring in new strength. Bennett is Defense Minister and that's an important thing for the State of Israel. The fact that he's Defense Minister gives him priority, the achievement in the Defense Ministry is a good thing for Israel. We have an agreement and full partnership, we went into politics together in order to work and achieve things, we could have taken two smaller portfolios and we chose the Defense Ministry over those two portfolios."

Read the original here:
Shaked: Relationship with Bennett is 'excellent' - Arutz Sheva

The End of a Jewish Presence in Europe? – The Jewish Press – JewishPress.com

Posted By on December 23, 2019

Photo Credit: WikiCommons / Daniel Vorndran / DXR

{Originally posted to the Gatestone Institute website}

On December 3, the French National Assembly passed a resolution adopting the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliances definition of anti-Semitism. The resolution stressed that the definition encompasses manifestations of hatred toward the State of Israel justified solely by the perception of the latter as a Jewish collective. MP Meyer Habib, who supported the resolution, delivered a passionate and poignant speech, highlighting the extent of the anti-Semitic threat in todays France, and the close links between hatred of the Jews and hatred toward Israel:

Since 2006, twelve French people have been murdered in France because they were Jewish. Although Jews represent less than one percent of the population, half of the racist acts committed in France are committed against Jews. Anti-Zionism is an obsessive demonization of Israel and an abuse of anti-racist and anti-colonial rhetoric to deprive the Jews of their identity.

He added that getting the votes to pass the resolution was extremely difficult because of a general lack of political courage sadly, a quality often absent in France when it comes to anti-Semitism and Israel.

French political leaders often declare that fighting against anti-Semitism is of utmost importance; they say it every time a Jew is murdered in the country. The only anti-Semitism they seem ready to fight, however, is right-wing anti-Semitism. They seemingly refuse to see that all the Jews killed or assaulted in France since 2006 were victims of Muslim anti-Semites and French political leaders never utter a word about it. They appear to hide Islamic anti-Semitism embedded in the Quran and Hadiths and reinforced in the 1930s by the Nazis friendship with the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini under a Muslim hatred of the Jews based on a supposedly legitimate Muslim hatred of Zionist crimes'.

French political leaders also seemingly refuse to see another form of anti-Semitism that is on the rise: leftist anti-Semitism. It is precisely this leftist anti-Semitism that uses the mask of anti-Zionism to spread anti-Jewish hatred.

French political leaders also never speak about the way the French mainstream media talk about Israel, or about the consequences of those articles and reports. They constantly and falsely describe Israel as an evil country whose soldiers cavalierly kill Arabs on a daily basis and whose citizens illegally occupy territories (despite having been there for more than 3,000 years) that might belong to another people whom they cruelly deprive of everything.

French political leaders do not criticize anti-Israel articles and reports: the way most of them talk about Israel is just as anti-Israel as the worst anti-Israel articles. The government itself does no better. When Israeli Jews are murdered in a terrorist attack, the French government publishes a statement deploring the attack and urging Israel to show restraint and avoid starting a cycle of violence. When an attack takes place in the eastern part of Jerusalem or in the West Bank, the statement mentions that East Jerusalem and the West Bank are Palestinian territories illegally occupied by Israel. It is a way of saying that Jews should not be there, that the victims are the guilty party, and that those who attack them had good reason to do so.

November 12, when US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said that Jewish communities in the disputed territories do not contravene international law, the French government immediately issued a statement saying that the Israeli policy of colonization in the Palestinian occupied territories is illegal under international law, in particular international humanitarian law.

This reaction is in line with the positions taken by the French government in recent years: when US President Donald J. Trump recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and moved the US embassy there, French President Emmanuel Macron said that the move was a serious mistake and stressed that the French embassy would remain in the make-believe capital of Israel, Tel Aviv. An official statement added that France is the friend of Palestine and supports the creation of a Palestinian state, with Jerusalem as its capital. France does not recognize Jerusalem as part of Israels territory: the French consulate in Jerusalem is described in French official documents as the French Consulate in Jerusalem; the word Israel is omitted. When French citizens residing in Israel vote, the votes of those in Jerusalem are counted separately from the votes of those elsewhere in Israel.

At the Institute of the Arab World, funded by the French government and Arab countries, opened its doors in the center of Paris in 1987, the conferences and exhibitions are often imbued with anti-Israeli hatred. Currently, at an exhibition called AlUla, marvel of Arabia, visitors can see a map where the entire land of Israel is covered with the words Palestinian territories. When Jewish organizations protested, the word, Israel was finally added next to Palestinian territories.

Almost all the murders of Jews in France were not only committed by Muslim anti-Semites, but by Muslims unjustly identifying French Jews with criminal Israel. Mohamed Merah, who murdered Jewish schoolchildren in Toulouse, told a police officer that he killed Jewish children because the Jews kill Palestinian children and that he saw many reports on French TV showing it. What he said did not prompt the French government to ask French television stations to be more careful to avoid whatever could be regarded as incitement to hatred and murder.

At the moment, Meyer Habib is nearly the only French MP denouncing anti-Semitism, anti-Zionism, anti-Israeli bias in the French media and the anti-Israel positions of the French government and many politicians. He often receives anti-Semitic death threats; his family and he need to live under around-the-clock police protection. He represents French citizens living abroad in Israel, Italy and Turkey; he could not be elected anywhere on French territory.

Habib has also said that the December 3 resolution is just a resolution. Only a minority of MPs voted in favor of it. The only reason it was passed at all is that many MPs chose to abstain. Several voted against it and once again announced that they were proudly anti-Zionist. Either way, the resolution will not become a law and has no consequences.

The French media, political leaders and government will almost certainly not change their hostile positions regarding Israel. No French political leader supports Meyer Habib or dares to disagree with the French governments statements regarding Israel, except to say that the French government is still too pro-Israel.

As a demographic change is rapidly taking place in France, the countrys media, political leaders and government are behaving accordingly. Jews have become a shrinking part of the population 0.6 % and carry no political weight. The French Muslim population is quickly growing to more than 12% of the total. It has become virtually impossible to win an election in France without now counting on the Muslim vote.

The few people who still criticize Islam and Muslim anti-Semitism in France are mercilessly harassed by Islamic organizations and even more harshly condemned by the courts. A few days ago, on December 4, a prosecutor asked the court to sentence Christine Tasin, president of the anti-Islamic movement Republican Resistance. In June 2017, she wrote an article containing the statements: Anti-Muslim acts of anger are inevitable in the short or medium term in all European countries, including France, which are undergoing a Muslim invasion and Islam may be incompatible with Western civilization. Tasin was accused by the Collective Against Islamophobia in France (CCIF) of inciting anti-Muslim terrorism. The CCIF, is an organization created by Muslims of France, the French branch of the Muslim Brotherhood. The prosecutor said that the charge pressed by the CCIF was perfectly valid, and that Tasin needs a lesson. She could be the first person in France to be sent to prison for the crime of Islamophobia.

Many participants at the Islamic and leftist demonstration against Islamophobia in Paris on November 10 shouted explicitly anti-Zionist slogans, such as Israel Assassin and Palestine shall win. Several demonstrators carried Palestinian and Hamas flags. By contrast, a demonstration a week later, denouncing Islamic terrorism, brought together fewer than 2,000 participants.

On October 30 in Paris, when President Macron inaugurated the European Center for Judaism, he named all the Jews recently murdered in France. He did not, however, name the murderers. He merely denounced the foul beast, an expression created by Bertolt Brecht and now often used in France to incriminate Nazi sympathizers. He mentioned threats posed by those who want to sow hatred and division and expressed his support for the Muslims wounded in a failed attack on the mosque in Bayonne, in southwest France. He spoke positively of a time when a large part of Spain was Muslim, and said that there, in Andalusia, the Jews, despite their dhimmi status, developed an extraordinary culture.

The author Barbara Lefebvre saw in these words a eulogy for Jews an acceptance of dhimmitude [being ruled under Islam as a third-class tolerated citizen, sometimes paying a protection tax] and of the submission that comes with it. She wrote that summoning the brown plague and the dark hours of our history to evoke the threat faced by the Jews living in France is a historic, memorial and political insult, and that Macrons speech paved the way for condemning the French Jews to move out of the country or lock themselves in a community bubble, like dhimmis in the land of Islam.

In Europe, France is no exception. Anti-Semitism is advancing throughout the continent and often has a Middle Eastern cast. Yet, the authorities talk only about right-wing anti-Semitism.

In Germany, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution conducted a study analyzing Muslim attacks perpetrated against the Jews there in 2017 but it explicitly refused to say that these attacks were anti-Semitic, and instead attributed them to religious and cultural beliefs that Muslim immigrants bring with them to Germany.

German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas added, as if it were an excuse, that Muslims arriving in Germany come from countries in which the powerful incite hatred toward Jews and Israel. A study conducted in the United Kingdom by the Institute for Jewish Policy Research showed that anti-Semitism is far more prevalent among British Muslims than among other citizens of the country but the study was reported only in the British Jewish press.

Leftist anti-Semitism is present all over Europe. Its followers, as in France, do their best to hide and protect Middle Eastern anti-Semitism.

In the United Kingdom, anti-Semites entered the Labor Party through the Left. The leader of the Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn, was recently accused by Britains chief rabbi Ephraim Mirvis of anti-Jewish racism.

Most major European media are as anti-Israel as the major French media. In July, Josef Schuster, president of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, described an article published by the magazine Spiegel as using anti-Semitic clichs to vilify Israel. It is not the only article of its kind in the German press. Shuli Davidovich, an Israeli press attach in London, said a decade ago:

Definitely some papers never give any credit to Israel for some people especially in such papers as the Guardian, the human face of the Israeli does not exist. Its always the helmet, the rifle, the aggressor, the occupier.

Today, nothing has changed. The Guardian often publishes articles supporting the economic and cultural boycott of Israel. Manfred Gerstenfeld, a commentator, noted the growing abundance of anti-Semitic cartoons that now accompany anti-Israeli articles in the European press. Anti-Semitic cartoons, he pointed out, abound in Norway a country with only 700 Jews. Many cartoons, he said, depict Jews as parasites, exactly as in the Muslim countries press.

Most of Europes political leaders are as hostile to Israel as Frances political leaders are. The European Union stubbornly defends the idea that Israel must return to the 1949 armistice line, often referred to as the 1967 borders. The EU claims that Israel illegally occupies Palestinian territories. Every time Federica Mogherini, Vice President of the European Commission until last month, speaks about the Middle East, she describes Israel as an occupying power. Her successor, Josep Borrell, advocates for unilateral recognition of Palestinian statehood. Iran wants to wipe out Israel, he has said; nothing new about that. You have to live with it. Nine of the 28 member States of the European Union Sweden, Cyprus, Malta, Hungary, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Romania recognize a state of Palestine but ignore that the Palestinian Authority has never renounced its plan to obliterate Israel and take its place, nor stopped committing acts of terrorism.

The demographic transformation happening in France is also spreading throughout Western Europe, and the growing submission to Islam is being silently accepted by the ruling authorities almost everywhere. Political parties opposed to Islamization are pushed to the margins. Some Central European leaders Prime Minister Viktor Orbn in Hungary, Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki in Poland and President Milo Zeman in the Czech Republic are the only ones explicitly to reject the Islamization of their countries and take measures to curb Muslim immigration. They are often condemned by Western European leaders who want to force them to welcome immigrants by the thousands.

Reports show, not surprisingly, that the rise in the number of Muslim immigrants has led to an even broader rise in anti-Semitism.

In 2018, the EUs Fundamental Rights Agency surveyed Jews in the 12 European countries with the largest Jewish populations. The report concluded that 28% experienced some form of harassment for being Jewish, 47% worry about anti-Semitic verbal insult or harassment and 40% about physical attack, 38% have considered emigrating in the past five years over safety fears.

Another study, undertaken by Germanys University of Bielefeld in 2011, showed that 40% of European adults agreed with the statement, Israel behaves toward the Palestinians like the Nazis behaved toward the Jews.

In an article named Judenrein Europe, the American political commentator Joel Kotkin wrote that all available data show that anti-Jewish hatred and anti-Israel prejudices will continue to spread throughout all Europe, and that it could mean the end of Jewish presence on the continent:

For millennia, following the destruction of the Second Temple and the beginning of the diaspora, Europe was home to the majority of the worlds Jews. That chapter of history is over. As Jews continue fleeing the continent, by the end of this century all thats left will be a Jewish graveyard.

See original here:
The End of a Jewish Presence in Europe? - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com

Hanukkah: Lighting the path to Redemption – Arutz Sheva

Posted By on December 23, 2019

Daniel Pinner Daniel Pinner is a veteran immigrant from England, a teacher and an electrician by profession; a Torah scholar who has been active in causes promoting Eretz Israel and Torat Israel.

How many candles do we light on each of the nights of Hanukkah?

The Talmud (Shabbat 21b) records the different opinions of Beit Shammai (the Academy of Shammai) and Beit Hillel (the Academy of Hillel): Beit Shammai says that on the first day we light eight [candles], and from then on decrease by one each day; Beit Hillel says that on the first day we light one [candle], and from then on increase by one each day.

The difference is not merely technical. Rather, it is indicative of two different world-views. Shammai typically emphasises the future potential, and Hillel typically emphasises the presently-existing actual.

Hence on Hanukkah, according to the Academy of Shammai the number of candles we light on each night indicates the number of days still to come (the potential, the future yet to come); according to the Academy of Hillel, the number of candles indicates which night of Hanukkah this is (the actual, what exists in the present).

This follows the explanation of the Amora (Talmudic sage of the post-Mishnaic period) Rabbi Yossi bar Avin [1], cited in the Talmud (ibid).

Another Amora, Rabbi Yossi bar Zavida [2], offered an alternative explanation for Hillel and Shammais difference of opinion:

According to him, Shammai saw the Hanukkah candles as paralleling the bulls which were sacrificed on Sukkot, which diminished from thirteen bulls on the first day of Sukkot, to twelve on the second day, and so on down to seven bulls on the seventh and final day of Sukkot (Numbers 29:12-34).

Hillel, by contrast, applied the principle that we increase sanctity, and we do not decrease it.

The principle that we increase sanctity, and we do not decrease it occurs throughout the Talmud to adjudicate such diverse halakhot as determining the place where the show-bread was offered (Shekalim 6:4 and Menachot 11:7), the tasks that certain rabbis could perform (Berachot 28a and Yoma 20b), how many verses each man called up to the Torah on a weekday should read (Megillah 21b), under what circumstances a Kohen who has been disqualified can be restored to his office (Horayot 12b), recycling the parchment of Tefillin to make a Mezuzah or vice versa (Soferim 14:20), and dozens of other instances.

Shammai, by contrast, saw a parallel between Sukkot and Hanukkah

Rabbi Yossi bar Zavidas explanation of Shammais ruling compels the question: What is the connexion between Sukkot and Hanukkah?

The seventy bulls sacrificed during Sukkot (13 on the first day, 12 on the second, and so on down to 7 on the final day) correspond to the seventy nations of the world. (This idea occurs in countless Midrashim; see for example Bamidbar Rabbah 21:24, Eichah Rabbah 1:23, Shir ha-Shirim Rabbah 1 [15]:2, Midrash Shocher Tov to Psalms 109, and Yalkut Shimoni, Psalms 868.)

We would sacrifice 70 bulls during Sukkot to atone for the sins of all 70 nations, hence Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levis aphorism that had the nations of the world known how beneficial the Holy Temple was for them, they would have built fortresses around it to defend it, for it was even more beneficial for them than it was for Israel (Bamidbar Rabbah 1:3 and Tanhuma, Bamidbar 3).

And Hanukkah is the Festival that celebrates our victory over the Seleucid Empire which defiled our Holy Temple, which for decades used its seemingly invincible military might to prevent us from bringing any sacrifices. As a result of the Hanukkah victory, the sacrifices in the Holy Temple were restored, and those 70 bulls, atoning for the 70 nations, could once again be sacrificed.

As Sukkot teaches our potential to elevate the entire world not only Israel in sanctity, so Hanukkah is the Festival that celebrates the restoration of that potential. So Shammai, who focuses on the potential, derives the laws of Hanukkah from the laws of Sukkot.

Hillel, by contrast, focuses on the actual. The Holy Temple is the very epitome of sanctity, the actualisation of sanctity in this physical, temporal world. So Hillel derives the laws of Hanukkah from the principle that we increase sanctity, and we do not decrease it hence according to him we increase from one candle on the first night to two candles on the second night, and so forth.

In this, as in almost all disputes between Hillel and Shammai, we follow Hillels opinion.

The Talmud (Eiruvin 13b) records that for three years the Academy of Shammai and the Academy of Hillel disputed, each one claiming that the halakhah follows us!. A Heavenly Voice came forth, proclaiming: Both are the words of the Living God and the halakhah follows the Academy of Hillel.

The Yerushalmi cites the same episode in several places (Berachot 1:4, Yevamot 1:6, Sotah 3:4, Kiddushin 1:1), but provides an additional detail: Where did this Heavenly Voice come forth? In Yavneh.

In Yavneh meaning after the destruction of the Holy Temple, after the Sanhedrin relocated from the Chamber of Hewn Stone at the entrance of the Holy Temple to Yavneh.

So we follow the opinion of the Academy of Hillel in the present era, the time in which the Holy Temple is yet to be restored.

And when will Beit Shammais opinion constitute practical halakhah? The Zohar (Raayah Meheimnah Volume 3, Parashat Pinchas 245) explains that Hillels opinion is appropriate for this world, while Shammais opinion is reserved for the days of mashiach.

So in the days of mashiach, the time when todays potential will become the actual, we will light eight candles on the first night of Hanukkah, seven on the second, and steadily diminish until we will light one candle on the eighth and final night.

For thousands of years we have lit the Menorah according to Hillels ruling, lighting one candle on the first night, two on the second night, and so on.

But in the future time to come, in the days of mashiach, when the third and final and eternal Holy Temple will stand, we will celebrate Hanukkah according to the ruling of the Academy of Shammai. Then we will light eight candles on the first night, seven on the second night, and so on.

And so this Sunday afternoon, a few hours before Hanukkah begins, as I prepare my Hanukkah Menorah for the first night of Hanukkah while the sun is still shining, I will fill eight vials of olive oil ready for lighting. Because I dont know what might happen between preparing the Menorah and sunset, and I want to be ready for anything that may happen. And maybe, just maybe, before sunset

Endnotes

[1] Rabbi Yossi bar Avin was a fifth-generation Amora one of the last of all the Israeli Amoraim (the Amoraim would continue in Babylon for another century). Born in Israel, he went down to Babylon (Yevamot 75b), and later returned to Israel (Yerushalmi Pesachim 10:2). He lived in the mid-4th century, almost four centuries after Hillel and Shammai. His chain of learning descends from Hillel: Rabbi Yossi bar Avin was a disciple of Rabbi Avahu, who was a disciple of Rabbi Yochanan bar Nafcha, who was a disciple of Rabbi Yannai, who was a disciple of Rabbi Chanina bar Chama, who was a disciple of Rabbi Yehudah the Nasi [Head of the Sanhedrin], who was son and disciple of Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel, who was son and disciple of Rabban Gamliel, who was son and disciple of Rabban Shimon (the second), who was son and disciple of Rabban Gamliel the Elder, who was son and disciple of Rabban Shimon (the first), who was son and disciple of Hillel.

[2] Rabbi Yossi bar Zavida (in some texts called Rabbi Yossi bar Zavda, probably erroneously) was a contemporary, colleague, and friend of Rabbi Yossi bar Avin (Berachot 22a), and also studied under Rabbi Avahu, so he came from the identical chain of learning and tradition.

[Readers who are interested in receiving Daniel Pinners writings direct to their mailbox are invited to join a Yahoo group by emailing DanielPinnerWritings@groups.io.]

Read the rest here:

Hanukkah: Lighting the path to Redemption - Arutz Sheva

Light of Hanukkah inspires inclusive vision – The Bozeman Daily Chronicle

Posted By on December 23, 2019

Twenty-twenty is greater than the terminology of eye doctors. All of us can share in the blessing of 20/20 vision witnessing the light of Hanukkah. The Jewish Festival of Lights inspires us to have a broader and more inclusive vision.

The Talmud, canonized 2,000 years ago as the repository of vast amounts of Jewish thought, lore and law, describes Hanukkah. The Maccabees, a small group of fighters who lived over 2,000 years ago, miraculously defeated the oppressive Greco-Syrians. Upon entering the Jerusalems Holy Temple, the Maccabees found utter destruction. Amidst the damage, they found one cruse of oil, enough for one day. But a miracle occurred, and they were able to light the candelabra for eight days. The following year they established these days as a holiday for praise and thanksgiving.

Hanukkah is a miracle of human perseverance and divine presence. The rabbis of yesteryear proactively reframed the historical account of the Maccabees military victory in terms of a divine miracle of the everlasting cruse of oil. They clearly wanted future generations to realize the power of spirit over the strength of physical prowess and overarching reality.

After all, can we have faith when evidence foments doubt? Can we persevere when challenges abound? Do we have the fortitude of believing in a better tomorrow when today is most difficult? As the days grow darker this time of year, we muster up deep faith that future days will be brighter and life unfolds goodness.

This perspective is embedded in Jewish tradition. We initiate days as beginning with the evening just as the biblical narrative describes the original days of creation as starting in the evening followed by morning. The Jewish Sabbath starts with sunset on Friday continuing through Saturday. Our mission in life is to move from darkness to light and that is one reason Hanukkah is so valuable.

Hanukkah concludes this year on Dec. 30, with a bright Hanukkah candelabra, the menorah of eight glowing lights. The festival ends with more light than it starts. Whereas, we expect things to run out and diminish, this festival inspires us to see what endures: love, kindness, truth, hope and peace. This glorious Festival of Lights leads into the new calendar year of 2020.

The Talmud empowers us to focus on the single cruse of oil symbolizing our capacity to make more than what might be apparent. Our inner being is our greatest enduring resource that guards and inspires our lives.

Hanukah begins Sunday evening Dec. 22. I pray that these sacred lights enlighten all of our lives. An ancient story has evolved over millennia. Today, Hanukkah strengthens our generation. May we be blessed with spiritual 20/20 vision. May the coming year grant us meaningful lives filled with goodness that brings peace

Shalom Uveracha-Peace and Blessings.

Rabbi Mark H. Kula serves at Congregation Beth Shalom in Bozeman.

Read the original post:

Light of Hanukkah inspires inclusive vision - The Bozeman Daily Chronicle

13 Facts About the Maccabees Every Jew Should Know – Chabad.org

Posted By on December 23, 2019

1. The Maccabees Are the Heroes of Chanukah

The Maccabees were Jewish fighters who led the revoltagainst the Syrian Greek ruling class, who had suppressed Jewish religion in aneffort to spread their Hellenistic customs and idolatrous beliefs. The Maccabeevictory, and the subsequent miracle of the oil burning in the Temple menorahfor eight days instead of one, is what we celebrate every year during theeight-day holiday of Chanukah.

Read: 13 Chanukah Facts Every Jew Should Know

The Talmud speaks little of Chanukah. The one time the storyis briefly told, the leaders of the group (and their descendants) are referredto as the House of Chashmonai, the ancestral family of Matityahu, the pious andbrave priest who led the group until his passing.

Read: What Happened to Tractate Chanukah?

Matityahu began his revolt in the village of Modiin, wherethe Greeks tried to compel him to publically engage in idol worship. When herefused, violence broke out and a group of Jews ended up taking refuge in cavesamong the surrounding hills.

Read: Whats So Terrible About Idolatry?

According to Josephus, after the Maccabees refused to complywith the Greek demands, they were attacked on Shabbat morning. Devoted toTorah, the Jews refused to fight back, and around 1,000 people, including manywomen and children, died from fire and smoke.

After that, Matityahu made it clear that Judaism is areligion of life, and that the Shabbat laws are temporarily suspended to save alife.

Read: 25 Shabbat Facts Every Jew Should Know

Matityahus five sonsYochanan, Yehuda, Shimon, Elazar, andYonatanjoined the struggle. After a year of leadership, as the elderlyMatityahu neared his end, he exhorted the group to follow Shimons guidance inreligious matters and to appoint Judah as their military leader.

Read: A Brief Bio of Judah the Maccabee

The term Maccabee, which was apparently first onlyassociated with Judah, may be related to the Hebrew word for hammer or theGreek words for strong or fighter.

Perhaps the best-known explanation is that the wordMaccabee comprises the initial letters of a verse theJewish people sang after Gd split the sea: Mi kamocha baeilim Hashem ( ),Who is like You among the mighty, O Gd. Itis said that this phrase was the Maccabean battle cry,written upon their banners and shields.

Read:WhatDoes Maccabee Mean?

Matityahu and Judah were not merely fighting for politicalor national freedom. They saw themselves as fighting for Gd Himself. Josephustells of many instances where they prayed to Gd for success in their battles.In one instance, he records Judah telling his troops that victory depends noton the number of soldiers but on their faithfulness to Gd. He bolstered hisarguments with examples from Jewish history where a few pious Jews managed tovanquish thousands of enemies.

Read: Were the Maccabees Barbarians?

At times, the Maccabees faced overwhelming odds, vastlyoutnumbered and out-weaponed by the massive armies of Greek soldiers andmercenaries sent their way. Yet, with a prayer on their lips, they managed tosurprise the enemy and send them fleeing in fear time and time again.

Read: 10 Facts to Know About War and Judaism

After decisively routing the Greeks from the Land, Judah ledhis band of battle-hardened men to Jerusalem to restore the Holy Temple to itssacred use, which the Greeks had discontinued. They were met by a sorry sight:broken walls, overgrown courtyards, and pagan idols in Gds home. On the 25thday of Kislev (the first day of Chanukah), they rededicated the Temple, lit themenorah,offered the showbread,and resumed regularworship.

Read: 9 Little-Known Facts About the Holy Temple

As recorded in the Talmud, the Maccabees found just enoughpure oil in the Temple to kindle the menorah for a single day. As they had doneso many times before, they threw reason to the wind and placed their trust inGd. They lit the menorah, and a miracle occurred: the oil burned for 8 daysuntil more could be obtained.

They declared that these 8 days be celebrated as theFestival of Lights, commonly known as Chanukah (dedication).

Read: Why Is Chanukah 8 Days Long?

The Chashmonaim took for themselves the throne of kingshipand establish a monarchy. This was a grievous mistake, since they were Levitepriests and Gdhad already promised that only the descendants of David (from the tribeof Judah)may be appointed to the throne (see II Samuel 7:1215).Indeed, they were eventually usurped by Herod, an Edomite, who killed the HasmoneanKing Antigonus and took the throne for himself.

Read:AHistory of Jewish Monarchy

Even after he successfully trounced the Greek armies, Judahcontinued to fight off invaders from near and far. Sadly, he died courageouslyin battle and was laid to rest in Modiin.

Read: How Chanukah Is Celebrated in Modiin

Jewish lore tells the story of the brave Judith,who enticed a Greek general with cheese and wine before decapitating him, thussaving her townspeople from death. And then there is the story of Chanah, who encouraged herseven sons to die rather than cave to the Greek demands that theyworship idols.

Read: 18 Incredibly Brave Jewish Women

Read the rest here:

13 Facts About the Maccabees Every Jew Should Know - Chabad.org


Page 1,288«..1020..1,2871,2881,2891,290..1,3001,310..»

matomo tracker