Page 1,310«..1020..1,3091,3101,3111,312..1,3201,330..»

Meet the ‘groyper army,’ a movement that wants conservatives to be racist and anti-Semitic – JTA News

Posted By on December 7, 2019

WASHINGTON (JTA) The young man in the smiley face baseball hat and the Teddy Spaghetti t-shirt had a question for Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA, a pro-Trump youth movement. It was about an incident that long predated both of their births, and Kirk knew just what to say.

Why do you deny the attack on the USS Liberty which is well documented by both U.S. and Israeli sources and which resulted in the deaths and injuries of over 200 Americans? the man asked Kirk at an October event at the University of New Hampshire organized by Turning Point USA.

I deny that it was a deliberate attack by the Israeli government, Kirk replied coolly.

U.S. and Israeli officials long ago concluded that the attack on the Liberty was a tragic mistake. In the midst of the 1967 Six-Day War, Israel mistakenly identified the ship as Egyptian or Soviet and launched an airstrike, killing 34 crewmen. Israel apologized for the attack and paid damages to the United States and the families of the victims, but the incident has nonetheless been embraced by conspiracy theorists as a code for Israeli nefariousness.

It has also been embraced as part of a strategy by the far-right to publicly confront mainstream Republicans and insinuate their ideas into establishment conservatism. Led by Nick Fuentes, a 22-year-old YouTube personality, the so-called groyper army has regularly and publicly challenged mainstream conservatives for their views on the USS Liberty as part of a broader effort to paint them as subservient to Israel and unworthy heirs of President Donald Trumps America first agenda.

RT if you think that Charlie Kirk and Turning Point USA are not for America First, Fuentes says in a tweet pinned to the top of his Twitter feed.

At events around the country, groypers have heckled mainstream conservatives and asked provocative questions often about Israel, immigration and LGBTQ rights in an effort to unmask them as fake conservatives and frauds. Named for a more grotesque version of the cartoon Pepe the Frog, which has been coopted by white nationalists, the goal appears to be to move conservatism closer to white nationalism, according to Marilyn Mayo, a senior research fellow at the Anti-Defamation Leagues Center on Extremism.

What theyre trying to do, theres this whole grouping who refer to themselves as the dissident right, they want to move the Overton window, said Mayo, using a a term that refers to the spectrum of acceptable political discourse. They want to make racism and anti-Semitism mainstream.

Turning Point is a particularly ripe target for that effort because of its emergence as the vanguard of Trumps following among young adults. Last month, young people disrupted a Turning Point appearance by rising GOP star, Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-Texas, at Arizona State University. Days later they made headlines when they drove Donald Trump Jr. off the stage at an event the group organized at UCLA.

What a HUGE victory today, Fuentes posted on Telegram, a secure messaging app favored by white nationalists, according to The Daily Beast. Cannot be understated what an incredible win we saw at UCLA.

Groypers carefully couch their views in code and irony. Provocative questions about race are often wrapped in anodyne terms like identity and demographics. And at a recent Turning Point USA event in Ohio, a questioner asked Kirk if there were any awesome, fun dance parties at a recent speaking engagement in Israel, an apparent reference to the myth that Israelis were caught on video dancing after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

In an interview last year, Fuentes said he avoids the term white nationalist for purely tactical reasons.

The reason I wouldnt call myself a white nationalist its not because I dont see the necessity for white people to have a homeland and for white people to have a country, Fuentes said. Its because I think that kind of terminology is used almost exclusively by the left to defame and I think the terminology and the labels that we use I dont think that we can look at them outside of the context of their connotations in America.

The strategy appears to be bearing some fruit. In April, Ann Coulter retweeted a Fuentes tweet on immigration. Michelle Malkin, a Fox News regular, criticized efforts to silence groypers, who she described as truth-tellers.

Theyve been trying to figure out since Charlottesville what new tactics can we do to recruit more people and get the attention of the media, said Mayo. What were really seeing is that some of the views that these white supremacists present at these Q&As are views that some people who are considered mainstream have adopted.

There has been some skilled pushback from mainstream conservatives. When a heckler in Arizona shouted that Crenshaw is pro-sodomy, the congressman capably parried.

Bring it out guys, Crenshaw said. Let everybody know who you are.

Ben Shapiro, the Jewish conservative pundit, last month called out the groypers at an event of the Young American Foundation, another conservative youth movement that has denounced Fuentes. Shapiro noted that despite his best efforts, Fuentes was not always successful at maintaining an ironic distance from his bigotry.

You also happen to have the unfortunate habit of saying really disgusting things when you think other people arent listening, Shapiro said, recounting an incident in which Fuentes questioned the number of Jews murdered during the Holocaust by considering whether Cookie Monster could have baked six million cookies in five years. Shapiro then quoted a Nazi official describing how Jews were murdered.

But maybe he was just being ironic, bro, Shapiro said.

Howard Graves, a senior researcher at the Southern Poverty Law Center, who tracks the extreme right, said he saw in the groypers a new iteration of the 2016 election, when Trump pushed the Republican party rightward on issues like immigration.

It is recapturing that spirit of the 2016 election where there is this kind of no-holds-barred insurgent campaign against conservatism, he said.

View post:
Meet the 'groyper army,' a movement that wants conservatives to be racist and anti-Semitic - JTA News

State AG: Town is trying to keep Hasidic Jews out – Times Union

Posted By on December 7, 2019

State AG: Town is trying to keep Hasidic Jews out

New York

State Attorney General Letitia James is accusing a Hudson Valley town and county of "a concerted, systematic effort" to keep Hasidic Jewish families from moving into the town, where a developer says bias is blocking hundreds of planned homes.

James filed legal papers Thursday seeking to join a developer's suit against Orange County and the town of Chester over the way they have handled a plan for a 431-home community in the town about 60 miles north of midtown Manhattan.

The Greens at Chester project has been met with what the local governments call legitimate concerns about infrastructure and building codes. But the developers and James say what's really at play is a prejudiced drive to stop the project.

"Blocking the construction of homes to prevent a religious group from living in a community is flat-out discriminatory," James, a Democrat, said in a statement.

A lawyer for the town suggested James' office was interloping to try to pressure the town into settling.

"There is no reason for it to be unnecessarily involved in this matter on behalf of a private developer that can sufficiently represent itself," Chester attorney Mary Marzolla said in a statement.

Town Supervisor Robert Valentine, who won office on Republican and other lines, said he was disheartened by James' actions and looked forward to an eventual court decision "based on input from both sides and not on political influence."

Hasidic enclaves have sprouted in parts of Orange County, and their growth has sparked concern and complaints from some other residents about development density, schools, and other issues.

The complaints have, in turn, fueled accusations of anti-Jewish bias.

"We remain deeply concerned by the blatant anti-Semitism arising out of Orange County," Evan Bernstein, the regional director of the Anti-Defamation League, a Jewish civil rights group, said Thursday. He commended the attorney general's bid to get involved in the Greens at Chester case.

It concerns a 117-acre property where a previous, non-Hasidic owner got permission for the same number of homes, also after a long dispute with the town. Current owners Greens at Chester LLC bought it for $12.1 million in 2017.

Read the original here:
State AG: Town is trying to keep Hasidic Jews out - Times Union

The Tell: Three of the impeachment witness lawyers were Jewish, and it matters – JTA News

Posted By on December 7, 2019

WASHINGTON (JTA) On Wednesday, theU.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee launched impeachment hearings just hours afterthe Intelligence Committee, chaired by Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., concluded its own impeachment inquiry.

The 300-page Intelligence Committee report concludes that President Donald Trump placed his own personal and political interests abovethenational interests oftheUnited States in asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, calling it the act of a president who viewed himself as unaccountable and determined to use his vast official powers to secure his reelection.

It is nowthe Judiciary Committees task to decide whether to recommend articles of impeachment. And whilethe officials who appeared before Schiffs committee were fact witnesses who describedthe events surroundingthe Ukraine scandal, Judiciary Committee chair Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., brought three witnesses all constitutional scholars that he hoped would outline a theory of impeachment.

All three witnesses are Jewish: Noah Feldman of Harvard, Pamela Karlan of Stanford and Michael Gerhardt of the University of North Carolina. So are Schiff and Nadler, and so wastheDemocrats counsel who directedthe first 45 minutes of questioning, Norm Eisen.

Why does this matter?

Well, predictably, it mattered to anti-Semites.

Ann Coulter,the right-wing agitator, tweeted, Too little ethnic diversity amongthe professors for me to take them seriously. Consideringherpast flirtations with anti-Semitism, one could conclude that she wasnt faultingtheprofessors just for being white.

TruNews,the YouTube channel run by ananti-Semitic Florida pastor who has coinedthe term Jew coupto describethe impeachment process, took to Twitter to accuse Jewish socialist Jerry Nadler and his three Jewish witnesses of escalatingtheJew coup. TruNews also helpfully informed us that Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University scholar and witnesses called by theRepublicans who testified thattheevidence for impeachment simply does not add up, is a Roman Catholic.

Twitter removedthe tweet. Anti-Defamation League CEO Jonathan Greenblattscreenshotted it for posterity,calling on social media platforms to take action against blatantly anti-Semitic posts.

Why not ignorethe blatant anti-Semitism?

Because the fringes no longer have pariah status: TruNews has been accredited for White House news conferences. Trump has taken questions from them (about his plans for Israeli-Palestinian peace, of all things) and his son, Donald Jr., gave TruNews an impromptu interview earlier this year at a Michigan rally. (Trump Jr.s spokeswoman told The Washington Post that he was not aware atthe time of TruNews outlook.)

Those views have crept intothe mainstream discourse.

While the hearings were underway, Breitbart News,the Trump-boosting news site, posted a story, Norm Eisen, Democrat Impeachment Counsel, Linked to George Soros.Breitbart reportedthat Soros Open Society Foundation had helped fund an ethics watchdog Eisen founded, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, tothe tune of $1.35 million in 2017. (This is not a secret: Its on the Open Society website.)

Butthe Breitbart story failed to explainthe relevance. Eisen is not pretending to be nonpartisan or unaffiliated from a liberal outlook; there is no suggestion that Soros money is reachingthe committee itself.

Soros,the liberal Jewish billionaire philanthropist, is incessantly attached to conspiracies. Fiona Hill, a former senior National Security Council staffer, noted last month how the baseless Soros conspiracy theories besetthe Ukraine scandaland called them anti-Semitic.

Republicans onthe panel attempted to depictthe three scholars onthe Democratic side as effete elitists, another classic trope.

Democrats still dont get it, Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said on Twitter. They are pushing ahead with impeachment based on opinions from liberal law professors from coastal universities.

McCarthy, from California, attended a coastal university (Cal State, Bakersfield), and Turley, the GOPs scholar, teaches at one, George Washington but never mind.

This creates Jewish fear

I got texts from leading Jewish Democrats during Wednesdays hearings wondering, with not inconsiderable trepidation, whether thescholars were indeed Jewish.

The trepidation is a shame because considerations of how being Jewish shapes ones outlook should be free of anxieties about what anti-Semites will make of it. And there are meaningful Jewish stories behindthe decisions of these witnesses to become constitutional scholars:

I grew up in Alabama, and I grew up Jewish in Alabama inthe1960s, Gerhardt told C-Span last year, and that was a time of great turbulence, andthe timethecivil rights movement was sort of unfolding, and it was all unfolding in front of me, and I paid attention to it, and that those events that arose inthe 60s and early 70s really shaped my interest in civil rights, but also my interest in law.

Karlan, delivering closing remarks in 2006 at theannual meeting oftheliberal American Constitution Society, called herself one ofthe snarky, bisexual, Jewish women who wantthe freedom to say what we think, read what we want and love who we do,calling on listeners to seize backthe high ground on patriotism and on love of our country from the rich, pampered, prodigal, sanctimonious, incurious, white, straight sons ofthe powerful.

Feldman, who in 2015 launched Harvards Julis-Rabinowitz Program in Jewish and Israeli Law, also helped draftthe Iraqi constitution; he is gripped by how and whether religious and civil law can coexist.

Jewish law and Israeli law are distinct and different,Feldman was quoted as saying by Tablet atthe time ofthelaunch oftheHarvard program, yet they also interact and make claims on each other.

In Other News

Georgia on my mind:Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, a conservative narrowly elected a year ago with a boost from Trump, this week named businesswoman Kelly Loeffler to filltheSenate seat vacated by Johnny Isakson, who is ill.Thetwist is that Trump wanted Kemp to name Doug Collins,theranking member ofthe Judiciary Committee who ledthecharge Wednesday againsttheimpeachment and now Trump and Kemp are onthe outs. Trump is losing his luster in the South (gubernatorial candidates he backed were defeated in Kentucky and Louisiana and won narrowly in Mississippi) and women in Atlantas suburbs, emboldened since Trumps election, are thehinge on whether Georgia turns blue next year. Kemp does not want to further alienate them.

A lot of those women are Jewish. I spoke to two who head up asalon of 1,500 Jewish women aimed at flippingthestatefor Democrats, and also toAtlanta-area Jews who are grappling with how to rebuild a moribund alliance with African-Americansas a means to topple Republicans.Two Jewish candidates feature in two separate Senate races next year, and I met with both.

Two states and only two states:Earlier this year, Rep. Alan Lowenthal, D-Calif, introduced a resolution backed by J Street,theliberal Middle East policy group, that wouldrecommit Congress to a two-state outcome totheIsraeli-Palestinian conflict. Theidea was to keeptheoutcome alive while boththeTrump and Netanyahu governments had retreated from it.Theresolution likely comes to a vote before this week ends, and it has had a rocky road.

Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., themajority leader, endeavored to sign on Republicans totheresolution. They agreed, iftheword only was removed fromthe phrase onlytheoutcome of a two-state solution that enhances stability and security for Israel, Palestinians, and their neighbors can both ensurethestate of Israels survival as a Jewish and democratic state and fulfillthelegitimate aspirations ofthePalestinian people for a state of their own. J Street forcefully objected andthe Republicans balked.The resolution will pass with only, but a look atthesponsor list features only Democrats it wont accrue many, if any, Republicans.

Bipartisanship is becoming harder: AIPAC has been asking its members for weeks to get senators to sponsor legislation that would extend sanctions to entities dealing with already sanctioned Palestinian groups. So far, it has 20 sponsors for the Palestinian International Terrorism Support Prevention Act of 2019, but until this week there was just one Democrat, Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., who initiated thebill with Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla. Ive heard another two Democrats have just signed on.

Clemmons making Clemmonade:Alan Clemmons istheRepublican South Carolina state legislator you may never have heard of who is shaking up U.S. Israel policy. His2015 bill penalizing Israel boycotters has become a template for other state bills doingthesame thing. He ledthepush in 2016 fortheGOP to removethetwo-state outcome commitment from its platform. Clemmons now chairs ALEC, the American Legislative Exchange Council, a conservative group that circulates templates for state legislation themodel Clemmons pursued after passing his 2015 bill targetingthe movement to boycott, divest from and sanction Israel. That puts him in a position of enormous influence in theconservative world. ALEC had its annual get-together this week in Scottsdale, Arizona. ALEC is a wellspring of learning of, by and for legislators, he said in a release.

Worth a Look

Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law & Justice Jay Sekulow hosts the GMA Honors Celebration and Hall of Fame Induction at the Allen Arena at Lipscomb University in Nashville, Tennessee on April 29, 2014. (Rick Diamond/Getty Images for GMA)

Elizabeth Williamson atTheNew York Times profiles Jay Sekulow,the un-Giuliani:theTrump lawyer not currently mired in scandal and his own legal difficulties. He is alsothe general counsel for Jews for Jesus. Politico reported this week that Sekulows son, Jordan, also a lawyer on Trumps team, gleefully anticipated damagingthe scholars that House Democrats invited to impeachment. I cant wait to find out what crazy stuff the law professors have written, Jordan said on his dads radio show. I bet anti-Israel, borderline anti-Semitic. Maybe anti-American? That was before we learned all three were Jewish.

Tweet So Sweet

Seforim Chatter, an account dedicated to Jewish exegetical texts,uncovers a book on how to properly consume Hanukkah doughnuts.

Stay In Touch

Share your thoughts on The Tell, or suggest a topic for us. Connect with Ron Kampeas on Twitter at@kampeasor email him atthetell@jta.org.

The Tell is a weekly roundup of the latest Jewish political news from Ron Kampeas, the Jewish Telegraphic Agencys Washington bureau chief.Sign up hereto receive The Tell in your inbox on Thursday evenings.

Here is the original post:
The Tell: Three of the impeachment witness lawyers were Jewish, and it matters - JTA News

Three of the impeachment witness lawyers were Jewish, and it matters – The Jewish News of Northern California

Posted By on December 7, 2019

On Wednesday, theU.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee launched impeachment hearings just hours afterthe Intelligence Committee, chaired by Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., concluded its own impeachment inquiry.

The 300-page Intelligence Committee report concludes that President Donald Trump placed his own personal and political interests abovethenational interests oftheUnited States in asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, calling it the act of a president who viewed himself as unaccountable and determined to use his vast official powers to secure his reelection.

It is nowthe Judiciary Committees task to decide whether to recommend articles of impeachment. And whilethe officials who appeared before Schiffs committee were fact witnesses who describedthe events surroundingthe Ukraine scandal, Judiciary Committee chair Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., brought three witnesses all constitutional scholars that he hoped would outline a theory of impeachment.

All three witnesses are Jewish: Noah Feldman of Harvard, Pamela Karlan of Stanford and Michael Gerhardt of the University of North Carolina. So are Schiff and Nadler, and so wastheDemocrats counsel who directedthe first 45 minutes of questioning, Norm Eisen.

Well, predictably, it mattered to anti-Semites.

Ann Coulter,the right-wing agitator, tweeted, Too little ethnic diversity amongthe professors for me to take them seriously.Consideringherpast flirtations with anti-Semitism, one could conclude that she wasnt faultingtheprofessors just for being white.

TruNews,the YouTube channel run by ananti-Semitic Florida pastor who has coinedthe term Jew coupto describethe impeachment process, took to Twitter to accuse Jewish socialist Jerry Nadler and his three Jewish witnesses of escalatingtheJew coup. TruNews also helpfully informed us that Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University scholar and witnesses called by theRepublicans who testified thattheevidence for impeachment simply does not add up, is a Roman Catholic.

Twitter removedthe tweet. Anti-Defamation League CEO Jonathan Greenblattscreenshotted it for posterity,calling on social media platforms to take action against blatantly anti-Semitic posts.

Because the fringes no longer have pariah status: TruNews has been accredited for White House news conferences.Trump has taken questions from them (about his plans for Israeli-Palestinian peace, of all things)and his son, Donald Jr., gave TruNews an impromptu interview earlier this year at a Michigan rally. (Trump Jr.s spokeswoman told The Washington Post that he was not aware atthe time of TruNews outlook.)

Those views have crept intothe mainstream discourse.

While the hearings were underway, Breitbart News,the Trump-boosting news site, posted a story, Norm Eisen, Democrat Impeachment Counsel, Linked to George Soros.Breitbart reportedthat Soros Open Society Foundation had helped fund an ethics watchdog Eisen founded, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, tothe tune of $1.35 million in 2017. (This is not a secret: Its on the Open Society website.)

Butthe Breitbart story failed to explainthe relevance. Eisen is not pretending to be nonpartisan or unaffiliated from a liberal outlook; there is no suggestion that Soros money is reachingthe committee itself.

Soros,the liberal Jewish billionaire philanthropist, is incessantly attached to conspiracies. Fiona Hill, a former senior National Security Council staffer, noted last month how the baseless Soros conspiracy theories besetthe Ukraine scandaland called them anti-Semitic.

Republicans onthe panel attempted to depictthe three scholars onthe Democratic side as effete elitists, another classic trope.

Democrats still dont get it, Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said on Twitter. They are pushing ahead with impeachment based on opinions from liberal law professors from coastal universities.

McCarthy, from California, attended a coastal university (Cal State, Bakersfield), and Turley, the GOPs scholar, teaches at one, George Washington but never mind.

I got texts from leading Jewish Democrats during Wednesdays hearings wondering, with not inconsiderable trepidation, whether thescholars were indeed Jewish.

The trepidation is a shame because considerations of how being Jewish shapes ones outlook should be free of anxieties about what anti-Semites will make of it. And there are meaningful Jewish stories behindthe decisions of these witnesses to become constitutional scholars:

I grew up in Alabama, and I grew up Jewish in Alabama inthe1960s,Gerhardt told C-Span last year, and that was a time of great turbulence, andthe timethecivil rights movement was sort of unfolding, and it was all unfolding in front of me, and I paid attention to it, and that those events that arose inthe 60s and early 70s really shaped my interest in civil rights, but also my interest in law.

Karlan, delivering closing remarks in 2006 at theannual meeting oftheliberal American Constitution Society, called herself one ofthesnarky, bisexual, Jewish women who wantthe freedom to say what we think, read what we want and love who we do,calling on listeners to seize backthe high ground on patriotism and on love of our country from the rich, pampered, prodigal, sanctimonious, incurious, white, straight sons ofthe powerful.

Feldman, who in 2015 launched Harvards Julis-Rabinowitz Program in Jewish and Israeli Law, also helped draftthe Iraqi constitution; he is gripped by how and whether religious and civil law can coexist.

Jewish law and Israeli law are distinct and different,Feldman was quoted as saying by Tablet atthe time ofthelaunch oftheHarvard program, yet they also interact and make claims on each other.

Georgia on my mind:Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, a conservative narrowly elected a year ago with a boost from Trump, this week named businesswoman Kelly Loeffler to filltheSenate seat vacated by Johnny Isakson, who is ill.Thetwist is that Trump wanted Kemp to name Doug Collins,theranking member ofthe Judiciary Committee who ledthecharge Wednesday againsttheimpeachment and now Trump and Kemp are onthe outs. Trump is losing his luster in the South (gubernatorial candidates he backed were defeated in Kentucky and Louisiana and won narrowly in Mississippi) and women in Atlantas suburbs, emboldened since Trumps election, are thehinge on whether Georgia turns blue next year. Kemp does not want to further alienate them.

A lot of those women are Jewish. I spoke to two who head up asalon of 1,500 Jewish women aimed at flippingthestatefor Democrats, and also toAtlanta-area Jews who are grappling with how to rebuild a moribund alliance with African-Americansas a means to topple Republicans.Two Jewish candidates feature in two separate Senate races next year, and I met with both.

Two states and only two states:Earlier this year, Rep. Alan Lowenthal, D-Calif, introduced a resolution backed by J Street,theliberal Middle East policy group, that wouldrecommit Congress to a two-state outcome totheIsraeli-Palestinian conflict. Theidea was to keeptheoutcome alive while boththeTrump and Netanyahu governments had retreated from it.Theresolution likely comes to a vote before this week ends, and it has had a rocky road.

Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., themajority leader, endeavored to sign on Republicans totheresolution. They agreed, iftheword only was removed fromthe phrase onlytheoutcome of a two-state solution that enhances stability and security for Israel, Palestinians, and their neighbors can both ensurethestate of Israels survival as a Jewish and democratic state and fulfillthelegitimate aspirations ofthePalestinian people for a state of their own. J Street forcefully objected andthe Republicans balked.The resolution will pass with only, but a look atthesponsor list features only Democrats it wont accrue many, if any, Republicans.

Bipartisanship is becoming harder:AIPAC has been asking its members for weeks to get senators to sponsor legislation that would extend sanctions to entities dealing with already sanctioned Palestinian groups. So far, it has 20 sponsors for the Palestinian International Terrorism Support Prevention Act of 2019, but until this week there was just one Democrat, Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., who initiated thebill with Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla. Ive heard another two Democrats have just signed on.

Clemmons making Clemmonade:Alan Clemmons istheRepublican South Carolina state legislator you may never have heard of who is shaking up U.S. Israel policy. His2015 bill penalizing Israel boycotters has become a template for other state bills doingthesame thing. He ledthepush in 2016 fortheGOP to removethetwo-state outcome commitment from its platform. Clemmons now chairs ALEC, the American Legislative Exchange Council, a conservative group that circulates templates for state legislation themodel Clemmons pursued after passing his 2015 bill targetingthe movement to boycott, divest from and sanction Israel. That puts him in a position of enormous influence in theconservative world. ALEC had its annual get-together this week in Scottsdale, Arizona. ALEC is a wellspring of learning of, by and for legislators, he said in a release.

Elizabeth Williamson atTheNew York TimesprofilesJay Sekulow,the un-Giuliani:theTrump lawyer not currently mired in scandal and his own legal difficulties. He is alsothe general counsel for Jews for Jesus. Politico reported this week that Sekulows son, Jordan, also a lawyer on Trumps team,gleefullyanticipated damagingthe scholars that House Democrats invited to impeachment. I cant wait to find out what crazy stuff the law professors have written, Jordan said on his dads radio show. I bet anti-Israel, borderline anti-Semitic. Maybe anti-American? That was before we learned all three were Jewish.

Seforim Chatter, an account dedicated to Jewish exegetical texts,uncoversa book on how to properly consume Hanukkah doughnuts.

See the article here:
Three of the impeachment witness lawyers were Jewish, and it matters - The Jewish News of Northern California

PewDiePie Is the Most-Watched YouTube Creator of 2019 With 4 Billion Views – Variety

Posted By on December 7, 2019

PewDiePies Bro Army remains stronger than ever: The top YouTuber is the most-viewed creator of 2019 on the platform year-to-date, with more than 4 billion views this year, according to YouTube.

The comedian, game vlogger and meme aficionado, whose real name is Felix Kjellberg, is also the most-subscribed individual YouTube creator, currently with 102 million followers. Indeed, PewDiePies video views for the year were boosted by the months-long running battle stoked by Kjellberg and his fans to keep his sub count ahead of Indias T-Series music channel (which has since surpassed PewDiePie).

YouTube released the top 10 most-viewed creators ranking as part of its year-in-review compilations, which culminates in the 2019 YouTube Rewind mashup released Thursday which does feature PewDiePie this year.

After PewDiePie, the most-viewed YouTube creators of 2019 are: Brazilian vlogger Felipe Neto (2.8 billion); animation channel Pencilmation (2.8 billion); Dutch gaming creator Jelly (2.5 billion); David Dobrik (2.4 billion); trick-shot artists Dude Perfect (2.3 billion); creator-philanthropist MrBeast (2.2 billion); Australian gamer LazarBeam (2 billion); Fischers, a seven-member Japanese vlog crew (1.9 billion); and Canadian cosplayer-gamer AzzyLand (1.9 billion).

PewDiePie has been masterful at cultivating his fanbase, and produces a popular regular series, Meme Review. Most recently, he weighed in on the Baby Yoda, and with characteristic bluster said he would eat the tiny green alien from Disney Plus The Mandalorian to get rid of the meme. Also popular on PewDiePies channel this year was a film documenting the wedding of Kjellberg and his longtime girlfriend Marzia. (Last week, Marzia Kjellberg said in an Instagram post that thieves broke into their house and stole 90% of my valuables.)

A recent study found that PewDiePie has a higher favorability rating than NBA superstar LeBron James among Gen Z males in the U.S. PewDiePie and Lebron James have the same level of name recognition (95%) among Gen Z males, but more of them (62%) have a favorable view of PewDiePie than James (55%), per the Morning Consult survey.

PewDiePies popularity continues unabated in spite of or perhaps because of the fact that he has been the subject of ongoing controversies, including past criticism of his anti-Semitic jokes that Kjellberg acknowledged had gone too far.

After the mosque attacker in the mass killings in Christchurch, New Zealand called out the subscribe to PewDiePie meme in his live-streamed video, Kjellberg said he felt the responsibility to do something about it. In September, the Swedish-born YouTuber announced that he would be donating $50,000 to the Anti-Defamation League anti-hate group in a video unveiling his YouTube Red Diamond Creator Award, a new honor for channels that have hit the 100 million subscriber mark. But a day later backtracked and said his initial decision was a mistake and that the contribution didnt feel genuine.

Read more from the original source:
PewDiePie Is the Most-Watched YouTube Creator of 2019 With 4 Billion Views - Variety

How Cowardice and Anti-Semitism Stopped One of the Earliest Anti-Nazi Films from Getting Made – Mosaic

Posted By on December 7, 2019

In 1933, Herman Mankiewicza writer and producer with a successful career at MGMauthored a screenplay for a movie called The Mad Dog of Europe, set in Transylvania (an obvious stand-in for Germany) and focusing on two families, one Jewish and the other Christian. Deeply scarred by his service in World War I, a member of the latter family then falls under the influence of a deranged former housepainter named Adolf Mitler, and melodrama ensues. Mankiewicz teamed up with the producer Sam Jaffe to make the movie, but their efforts, which continued right up until 1939, were thwarted at every turn, as Sydney Ladensohn Stern recounts:

Although the studios top executives were almost all Jewish, they were well aware of anti-Semitisms prevalence in American culture and the dangers it posed to them. While leaders in other industries were praised for fulfilling the American Dream, successful motion-picture business executives were routinely portrayed as ignorant, jumped-up former garment merchantspants pressers, delicatessen dealers, furriers, and penny showmen, as Karl K. Kitchen wrote in Columbia, the official Knights of Columbus magazine. . . .

They were maligned as greedy capitalists whose sensational products corrupted wholesome Christian Americans, especially during a time when the Depression fueled so many resentments. They knew that if they depicted Nazi abuses, they risked being branded as warmongers, trying to pull the United States into a European problem to help their co-religionists.

Even as Mankiewicz and Jaffe had little luck finding backers, they soon encountered more active opponents, including Will Hays, the president of the Motion Picture Producers and Distributors of America (MPPDA):

Hays summoned [Jaffe] and Mankiewicz to his office and accused them of greed: they were exploiting a scarehead situation for the picture which, if made, might return them a tremendous profit while creating heavy losses for the industry. Then he asked, even if they were to find a studio willing to rent them production facilities, how could they exhibit the film if all the major theaters refused them? . . .

As Jaffe set up an office and hired the playwright Lynn Root to work on the script, a number of Jewish organizations mobilized. They, too, wanted Americans informed about Hitler and the Nazis, but they wanted the word spread by non-Jewish messengers. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which had been organized in 1913 specifically to combat anti-Semitism, joined studio heads and the MPPDA in actively opposing the realization of Mad Dog. They feared it would provoke accusations of Jewish warmongering, and they worried that if it failed commercially, it would demonstrate American apathy to Hitler or even pave the way for pro-Nazi films.

Read more at Commentary

More about: ADL, American Jewish History, Anti-Semitism, Hollywood, Nazi Germany

Here is the original post:
How Cowardice and Anti-Semitism Stopped One of the Earliest Anti-Nazi Films from Getting Made - Mosaic

What To Do About The Increasingly Vicious Anti-Jew Campus Protests – The Federalist

Posted By on December 7, 2019

On November 20 in Toronto, Canada, York Universitys Students Against Israeli Apartheid (SAIA) tried to shut down a school-approved event featuring a panel of Israel Defense Forces (IDF) veterans from Reservists on Duty, a group that travels to college campuses to provide facts about antisemitism and the boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel.

SAIA attracted around 600 protesters representing students as well as entities outside the school. According to Reservists on Duty CEO Amit Deri, this was the first protest where the group encountered a BDS and Antifa collaboration. What resulted was antisemitic violence colored with calls for genocide as protestors attempted to intimidate, demonize, and disenfranchise Israelis, Zionists, and Jews.

The presence of Toronto Police and private security personnel did not keep protestors and attendees from intermingling. One video shows individuals shoving and trying to punch one another in a packed stairwell. A pro-Palestine protestor claims he was punched by a pro-Israel attendee. Reservists on Duty stated protestors assaulted a few Jewish students. One person was injured during the protest.

Several videos show protestors inside the event space disrupting the panel by shouting and waving images, which were likely similar to those SAIA distributed in advance of the event in which an IDF soldier was Photoshopped to appear to strangle a Palestinian child.

Outside the event space, large groups gathered, banging on doors and chanting over loudspeakers. According to the Jerusalem Post, several protestors told event organizers to go back to the ovens. Numerous videos show protestors chanting Viva, Viva Intifada, referencing deadly periods of Palestinian attacks on Israelis.

Per the Anti-Defamation League, during the Intifada of 1987 to 1990, masses of civilians attacked Israeli troops with stones, axes, Molotov cocktails, hand grenades, and firearms. The Second Intifada of 2000 was a campaign of deadly terrorism targeting Israeli civilians on buses, restaurants and on city streets, killing over 1,000 Israelis, and wounding thousands more.

In the days following the well-covered antisemitic protests, Canadian politicians Roman Baber, the York Centre Member of Provincial Parliament, Doug Ford, the Ontario premier, and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau condemned protestors violence and hate.

York University has begun reviewing its methods for handling free speech about the conflicts in the Middle East. Toronto Police are investigating whether hate crimes occurred. Public outcry, coupled with the measured responses of administrators and police, will be important in finding ways to stem the growth of dangerous antisemitism on college campuses without quashing free speech.

Anti-Israel sentiment has long been problematic on college campuses, where groups often cloak antisemitism in social justice language. Allegiance to such movements, as well as events involving Israel on the world stage, led to numerous problematic displays of antisemitism, terror support, and misleading anti-Zionism at the University of Toronto, Michigan State University, Oberlin College, Butler University, and McGill University in recent weeks.

Other instances of on-campus antisemitism have received the attention of those who can make a difference.

On November 14, former IDF humanitarian officer Hen Mazzig spoke before students and faculty at New Yorks Vassar College. A group of 25 to 30 members of Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) disrupted his presentation by chanting outside the event space. For around 15 minutes, the noise was so loud that Mazzig could not speak. Among SJPs chants was from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free, which has historically been a call for the annihilation of the Jewish state of Israel.

Mazzigs talk centered around his experience as a Mizrahi Jew, a descendant of the 850,000 Jewish refugees who were expelled from Arab and Muslim countries between 1941 and 1972. As he explains in a guest column in The College Fix, he and other Mizrahi Jews are breathing proof that Israel has savednot only white lives, but also those of people of color.

In an attempt to advocate for the marginalized, these students shouted down the gay son of refugees, Mazzig wrote. In an effort to stand up for minority rights, they denigrated a Jew of color. In the pursuit of peace, they perhaps unknowingly made public calls for the death of my family.SJP subsequently took to Facebook to call deadly intifadas popular uprisings and states it does not believe Zionism should have a platform [at Vassar].

Several days later, SJP member Ezra Mead wrote an op-ed in The Forward, claiming Mazzig uses his gay identity and intersectionality, and explaining the group protested because members believed [Mazzigs] talk would be little more than pro-Israel propaganda. In closing, Mead indicated Mazzig should be disposessed of his right to free speech because there can be no free exchange of ideasabout the forced dispossession and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.

SJPs equivocations revealed the hatred and bigotry underlying their social justice message.

Administrators at another school, New York University (NYU), failed to protect Jewish students from a hostile atmosphere of antisemitism that developed on its campus in 2018.

In spring 2018, 53 of the schools 360 student clubs agreed to boycott NYUs two pro-Israel groups, which led to passage of an anti-Israel resolution, circulation of a threatening flier, and a week of protests. At an April 2018 rally for Israel, members of SJP and Jewish Voice for Peace set fire to an Israeli flag, and grabbed a student singing the Israeli national anthem. These events left Jewish students at NYU in fear of displaying symbols of their religion.

The administration essentially told me that they were supportive of the Jewish community, but no concrete actions would be taken against SJP, Adela Cojab, former president of pro-Israel campus group NYU Realize Israel, told Fox News. The school advised her not to post on social media and to lower [her] own presence and the presence of [her] community.

A year later, in April 2019, SJP won the Presidents Service Award for its positive effects on the NYU community.

In June, Cojab brought her concerns to the Department of Education. On November 13, the Departments Office for Civil Rights announced it had begun a full-scale investigation into the environment of antisemitism at NYU.

Should the Department of Education decide NYUs campus environment is harmful, the school will be required to create a set of remedial steps to address anti-Semitism on campus. If it fails to do so, its federal funding may be at risk.

Institutions of higher learning are increasingly in thrall to anti-Israel groups that disguise bigotry and antisemitism behind flowery manipulations of the truth.

As these groups instigate violence and promote an atmosphere of hostility and misinformation, there are hopeful reminders of how each person has the power to make a difference. Graduates of affected institutions may be able to initiate change by reaching out to alumni officers about their rationale for withholding donations.

Responsive administrators like Vassar College President Elizabeth Bradley can make an important impact. The Department of Educations investigation at NYU proves students have options when administrations fail.

Although they may seem the most hopeless, events at York University demonstrate the power of public outcry to put a cold spotlight on antisemitic behaviors and the violence they spawn. Jews and gentiles alike can help ensure campuses are safe for Jewish students in the wake of rising antisemitism. We also must secure freedom of expression in such environments.

In this battle, the freedom to speak is the greatest weapon. Those whose arguments and facts are weak are attempting to supplant free speech rather than engage in dialogue. When we allow those who hate Israel and Judaism to speak freely, their words become their undoing.

The way we amplify the actions and alarming speech of antisemitism, and the words we choose for ourselves, are especially important. It is only by using our voices to spread truth that we can conquer hate and promote dialogues that create solutions rather than rancor.

Beth Bailey is a civilian intelligence analyst turned freelance writer in southeast Michigan. Her work can be found in the Washington Examiner and the Detroit News.

More:
What To Do About The Increasingly Vicious Anti-Jew Campus Protests - The Federalist

Brooke Goldstein Upholds the Civil Rights of Jews – Jewish Journal

Posted By on December 7, 2019

When Brooke Goldstein was in her third year at Yeshiva Universitys Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law in New York City, her graduation was almost delayed because she had to skip so many classes.

At the time, she was in the midst of filming a documentary on terrorist groups that recruit children for suicide bombings. Ironically, while the professor of a class called Human Rights and Genocide Clinic wanted to delay her credits, Goldstein was working to expose a human rights issue.

Goldstein told the Journal that filming the 2006 documentary The Making of a Martyr was an eye-opening experience for me. I used to think that the so-called Israeli-Palestinian conflict was very black and white; that there were good guys and bad guys and that was the end of it. But when I spent time with 6-year-old Muslim children who were repeating to me terrorist slogans like We have nowhere to go but up [blow up], I realized theres a complexity to the situation, and I became extraordinarily empathetic to these innocent children.

I decided to dedicate my life to exposing human rights violations, and not just against these children. These children, like children anywhere in the world, deserve their right to life. How tragic is it that they are being continually abused and, frankly, murdered for political gains?

With Goldstein, theres no equivocating, no relativizing, no virtue signaling. She simply is a proud Jewess, speaking the truth about our history, Israel and the threats of our various enemies.

Inspired by her experience exposing human rights violations and using facts and the law as her weapons Goldstein has transformed how the Jewish community defends itself. In 2010, she created The Lawfare Project (TLP), an international pro-Israel litigation fund that has facilitated nearly 80 lawsuits around the globe. It maintains an international network of more than 400 attorneys dedicated to defending and upholding the civil and human rights of the Jewish community.

There is this very liberal, democratic tradition in our country: using the courts to engage in litigation to uphold the basic rights of minorities, Goldstein said. Yet, while Jews have always been at the forefront of advocating for other minorities Rabbi [Abraham Joshua] Heschel marching with Martin Luther King [Jr.], for example we have never ourselves, as a minority community, really taken advantage of our rights to equal protection under the law, by strategically using the legal system to fight against anti-Semitic discrimination.

Throughout most of our Diaspora history, the reigning governments typically used the law against Jews. There often were two sets of laws: one for Jews and one for everyone else. In 1913, Bnai Brith founded the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). The ADLs original mission statement was to stop, by appeals to reason and conscience and, if necessary, by appeals to law, the defamation of the Jewish people.But it rarely went the legal route.

If we dont fight to enforce our rights, why should we expect anyone to respect them?

Brooke Goldstein

The big changes of the mid-20th century, such as removing quotas for Jews at universities and ending exclusions at restaurants and country clubs, largely were results of cultural shifts after the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Groups including the National Jewish Commission on Law and Public Affairs (COLPA) and Agudath Israel of America did use litigation, but mostly to help Orthodox Jews obey Jewish law while maintaining employment.

Born and raised in Toronto, Goldstein first practiced entertainment law after graduating from Cardozo. However, the release of The Making of a Martyr moved her in a different direction. Exposing the state-sponsored indoctrination and recruitment of innocent Muslim children was eye-opening, she said. This hate education is the root cause of terrorism.

Goldstein began working as in-house counsel for Daniel Pipes Middle East Forum (MEF) and also ran MEFs legal fund, which provided pro-bono counsel and financial support to members of the counterterrorist community and moderate Muslims speaking out against Islamist terrorism.

She then came up with the idea of creating a legal defense fund for Jews using the law to defend and enforce the basic civil rights of Jews just as it is used to defend the rights of every other minority group.

TLP stands on its own, outside the realm of hasbara, leaflets and protests. Goldstein stated, We file groundbreaking cases around the world to tackle the major issues facing the Jewish people from BDS (boycott, divestment and sanctions) to national origin or religious discrimination to state-sponsored discrimination.We are like the pro-Israel ACLU.

Not everyone, though, saw Goldsteins use of litigation as a positive.

When I first proposed a Jewish civil rights litigation fund there was backlash from some of the traditional Jewish leadership, Goldstein said. Thats too aggressive, they said. This is not how we do things.

As a civil rights attorney, aggressively asserting the rights ofmy clients to be free from unlawful discrimination is a compliment. That means youre a good lawyer. Can you imagine the NAACP (The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) being accused by the black community of too aggressively advocating for black civil rights? If we dont stand up for ourselves, who will? And if we dont fight to enforce our rights, why should we expect anyone to respect them?

Goldstein believes many Jews in the Diaspora have a problem with Jewish pride. We should be able to stand up like every other minority group in this country and say we deserve justice and say it loudly. We have every right to avail ourselves of the legal system, to equal protection under the law.

The community spends so much money on so-called pro-Israel advocacy,and its not moving the needle. Dollars are being spent educating Jewish students how to defend themselves, handing out pamphlets and leaflets for them to memorize, as though its the job of a Jewish student to defend Israel. The change you can make with one lawsuit or even one legal letter is enormous, she said. Not only can you ensure that the rights of your clients are respected and protected, and that similar unlawful behavior is deterred, but you go from defense to offense. And when one minority community enforces the law, all minority communities benefit.

Nine years after its launch, TLP successfully has litigated or helped litigate 79 cases in 17 jurisdictions around the world. TLPs website points to these cases as the most significant thus far:

San Francisco State University (SFSU)

SFSU has earned a reputation as one of the most anti-Semitic campuses in the country, after more than three decades of discrimination and abuse of Jewish students by peers, professors and administrators.

With Winston & Strawn LLP, TLP represented five SFSU students and two non-student San Francisco residents. They filed two lawsuits against the California State University (CSU) public university system, one in federal and one in state court, alleging violations of the First Amendment, 14th Amendment (Equal Protection Clause), Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act.

In March 2019, TLP and Winston & Strawn reached a landmark settlement against CSU, which ensured that CSU recognize Zionism as an integral part of Jewish identity.

We have never ourselves, as a minority community, really taken advantage of our rights to equal protection under the law, by strategically using the legal system to fight against anti-Semitic discrimination. Brooke Goldstein

National Lawyers Guild (NLG)

NLG, a public interest association of legal professionals, refused to sell advertisement space in its annual gala journal to an Israeli company. According to an email the NLG national office sent, the guilds refusal was based on an official resolution barring [NLG] from accepting funds from Israeli organizations.

TLP is lead counsel representing Bibliotechnical Athenaeum, the Israeli organization whose ad NLG rejected. TLP argued that New York City and state human rights and anti-discrimination laws prohibit an entity from engaging in BDS-related discriminatory conduct based on national origin and/or citizenship.

The NLGs second motion to dismiss the case most recently was rejected on March 2, 2018.

Kuwait Airways Corp. (KAC); Saudi Arabia Airlines (Saudia)

KAC refuses to recognize Israeli nationals passports or fly them on any of its flights. After alerting the U.S. Department of Transportation of KACs discriminatory behavior in 2017, TLP took steps to force the airline to choose between complying with federal and international law or face the termination of its lease at JFK International Airport. KAC canceled its JFK-London route, resulting in millions of dollars in pecuniary loss.

At the same time, TLP brought a suit against KAC in Switzerland, which resulted in KAC shutting down all its inter-European flights. TLP now is litigating in Frankfurt, Germany, to force KAC to comply with German anti-discrimination law on its flights to non-Arab League destinations with transfers in Kuwait. More than half of all KAC flight paths have been canceled because of TLPs anti-discrimination actions.

Spain

Numerous city councils throughout Spain have adopted discriminatory resolutions and other official policies of refusing to enter into any agreements or contracts (political, commercial, cultural) with Israeli entities and non-Israeli entities that cooperate or do business with Israeli companies.

TLP initiated legal action in various Spanish courts to invalidate the discriminatory council decisions. To date, its Spanish counsel successfully has nullified 65 city council and local resolutions, and paved the way for criminal action against government officials and city councils that continue to adopt BDS-related policies.

As a result of legal action taken last year by Spanish Jews represented by TLP, Google LLC reached an understanding with TLPs lawyers to block defamatory content, including material promoting Nazi ideology and Holocaust denial. The settlement came about when TLP filed several take-down notices with Google LLC, identifying content in its search results that included extreme and defamatory racism against the Jewish people. Googles lawyers examined the complaints and subsequently, various examples of anti-Semitic content identified in the notices were blocked from appearing in Google searches in Spain. This is the first time Google blocked illegal content against the Jewish people based on defamation complaints.

Leila Khaled

Khaled, a notorious plane hijacker and member of the designated terrorist group the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), has been traveling throughout Europe with impunity and giving speeches glorifying terrorism, including at the European Parliament.

TLP submitted a criminal complaint to the National Court of Spain against Khaled, charging her with public exaltation of terror financing, while applying for a European arrest warrant and lobbying for Khaleds inclusion on EU and Interpol databases.

In coordination with its Italian counsel from the Solomon Project, TLP engaged in a media and legal campaign that successfully resulted in Italys Interior Ministry barring the entry of Khaled into the country.

Hamas and Hezbollah TV

TV channels run by terrorist groups such as Al-Aqsa TV (Hamas) and Al-Manar (Hezbollah) regularly air programming targeting children that incites violence against Jews and promotes acts of terrorism.

TLP, upon discovering that a U.S.-based Internet Protocol TV (IPTV) provider was giving customers access to the two channels, drafted a memorandum of law analyzing potential criminal and civil liabilities to which the provider was exposed. After sharing the memorandum with law enforcement, an investigation was launched into the IPTV provider and the broadcast was shut down.

Correcting the Narrative

While TLP is tackling BDS in the courts, Goldstein believes there is an urgent need to change the underlying ideological narrative.

If you cant articulate why Jews, a minority community, deserve the right to sovereignty, then you have already ceded that space to the Jew-haters who are invading the left, and who seek to move the left toward a place that denies the right of Israel to exist, she said.

Im reminded of M.J. Nurenbergers The Scared and the Doomed, Goldstein said. During our peoples darkest hour, as Hitlers war machine kicked into high gear, much of the Diaspora establishment eschewed collective action to save European Jewry. These cosmopolitan, assimilated Jews did not want to risk their hard-earned place in American society by speaking out of turn.They wanted to be a part of the prevailing culture, not disturb it.

Goldstein said that in 2019, the price of anti-Semitism in the U.S. is plummeting. And its only going to get cheaper if American Jews avoid demanding respect and asserting their Jewish Zionist pride. Its time for the Jewish community as a whole to reject the anti-Semitic regressive left, not empower it, she said.

Some progressives have tried to tarnish Goldstein with the right-wing brush because she appears on Fox News and commends President Donald Trump for supporting Israel. Asked what she calls herself, she laughed and said Im Canadian.

She added, Dont expect any civil rights movement to respect you if you dont respect yourself. We are strong when we lead by example, not when we bow to radicalism or partisanship.

Whats next for TLP? We will continue to do what we do best, Goldstein said. Advocate against Jew-hatred and file groundbreaking civil rights cases to ensure our clients achieve the respect they deserve.

On the front burner is responding to a November ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). The court declared that European Union law now requires labels to be placed on products imported from disputed Israeli territories (West Bank, East Jerusalem, the Golan Heights). They have effectively mandated discrimination, Goldstein said. The law now treats Jewish-owned and Muslim-owned businesses differently, even if they operate in the same geographic location.

Moreover, the CJEU added that any consumers ethical considerations whether political, social, economic or environmental also necessitates labeling. Europe has opened up a Pandoras box of politicized product labeling and unleashed unintended consequences that could wreak havoc on international trade, Goldstein said.

How will TLP fight it? We will argue, on the basis of anti-discrimination law, against applying the requirements exclusively to Israel, Goldstein said. We are committed to challenging enforcement in every country and every locality that attempts to discriminate on the basis of ethnicity or religion.

At the same time, Goldstein said shell work toward creating an intelligent, forceful Jewish pridemovement Jews have always supported other minority pride movements. Now its time for ours.

Karen Lehrman Bloch is an author and cultural critic living in New York City.

View original post here:
Brooke Goldstein Upholds the Civil Rights of Jews - Jewish Journal

Wordplay: Stealth attacks in black and white – The Age

Posted By on December 7, 2019

Touch wood, anyway. In all my days of solving and setting crosswords, Ive yet to detect a summons being served, or even a cease-and-desist letter hitting the editors in-tray. Years ago, Sony lawyers snarled at my generic use of Walkman in a puzzle, but thats one litigious blip in three decades.

Doubtless a precedent is an unwise homophone away. Until then, however, let us rejoice in the irreverence of backroom chicanery, with British setters in particular making a sport of the Brexit limbo. Consider Tees, a puzzler for The Independent, who crafted this neat dig: Being extorted translates to Johnsons mantra (3,6,4).

Astonishingly, BEING EXTORTED can mutate into the latest Tory slogan: GET BREXIT DONE. Picaroon, a Guardian compiler, also plied Brexit in his wordplay: Politician Brits execrate violently online (6,9). Here the solution a partial anagram needs to perch online (RY or railway) to make: BREXIT SECRETA-RY.

Comedian and actor Sacha Baron Cohen tackles Facebook and its founder Mark Zuckerberg. Credit:AP

Yet the best ridicule lies in a setters knack to compose a scornful clue, one that lacerates serving politicians, only to deliver a po-faced answer. Knut, another Independent contributor, illustrates the ruse to a fault: Boris, leader of party, awful sneak and rat (9).

Imagine the cabinet gnashing, their lawyers seething, neither posse capable of seeking redress or retraction. Welcome to the refuge of Cryptopia, a writ-free zone of mud-pie hoicking, where any lobber can feign to seek an alternative target. Knut, say, would only mimic shock when confronted by the bailiff, explaining his Boris clue referred to PASTERNAK (jumbling P+SNEAK+RAT), and no-one else. Why, officer, was there another Boris you had in mind?

Why, officer, was there another Boris you had in mind?

No pollie is immune. Theresa May endured a mauling via such answers as MAYDAY and ANTIHEROES (No 1 Theresa in disguise). Back in July, Slormgorm of The Financial Timesalmost apologised: Insult about former PM shocks (7). The answer is DISMAYS, or May inside diss.

Labour or Conservative, home or abroad, the British compiler is intent to sneer at either side of the house or Atlantic. Again, Knut proves the point: Mischievous Mr V. Putin aka The Real Power in the White House? (6,5) Mix MRVPUTINAKA to unmask IVANKA TRUMP, and you grasp the risk-lite revelry. Cryptic face-slapping has been a hobby of solvers and setters alike, long before Facebook was a twinkle in Zuckerbergs eye. Just dont tell the Anti-Defamation League.

davidastle.com

More:
Wordplay: Stealth attacks in black and white - The Age

Letter to the Editor: To All the Decision-makers at Dana Point Times – Dana Point Times

Posted By on December 7, 2019

JILL RICHARDSON, Dana Point

The recent Letter to the Editor from Phil Hoskins was fullof false claims and ended with an outright anti-Semitic attack against a publicofficial.

You, as the editor of the Dana Point Times, printed his letter in its entirety, withoutapparent redaction, making you complicit in propagating these false claims andhate speech.

I was very surprised to see that you, Lillian Boyd, are nowasking me, a reader, to do the fact-checking for you. Nonetheless, I have donethat, using reputable national news sources.

Claim from Hoskins: Rep. Mike Levin misrepresented himselfas a moderate Democrat.

Fact: Levin ran as a progressive candidate and won the 49thCongressional District.

Claim from Hoskins: Levin was smiling away, as if tosay, Thanks, suckers . . . when he showed support for the Green New Dealproposal.

Fact: Levin, a former environmental attorney, has madeclimate change his signature issue. His support of the Green New Deal is inline with this well-known policy stance of his.

Claim from Hoskins: That there might be Soros money in[Rep. Levins] background . . .

Fact: According to KPBS, Democrat and environmentalattorney Mike Levin has raised $1.7 million and spent $1.5 million. Levinsmoney is mostly coming from small donors around the country through a companycalled ActBlue, which fundraises for Democratic candidates.

However, this last claim of Mr. Hoskins is the most heinousone, an outright dog whistle, born of an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory thatbackground money is coming from Soros and the Jewish wealthy, in some nefariousattempt to overthrow the world order. This is such a well-known fact that Ishould not even have to provide a source for it, but the Anti-Defamation Leaguehas addressed it, at length. This statement of Mr. Hoskins should never hadbeen published at all; I hold you, Ms. Boyd, personally liable for perpetuatingthis egregious attack on Levin and subjecting us readers to hate speech in ourlocal free newspaper

I am hereby challenging you and the staff the Dana Point Times to do better. You maynot be responsible for the claims made by the writers in the Letters to theEditor column, but you are responsible to prevent anti-Semitic hate speech andfalse claims from becoming an accepted part of the dialogue there.

Editors note: DanaPoint Times does not publish Letter to the Editor submissions containingpersonal attacks. Per the newspapers policy, the opinions of all readers arerespected and factual assertions within letters are vetted. Phil Hoskinsletter did not contain verbiage to be defined as hate speech. However, he didpose the possibility that Rep. Mike Levin had financial ties to George Soros,an investor associated with anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.

Go here to see the original:
Letter to the Editor: To All the Decision-makers at Dana Point Times - Dana Point Times


Page 1,310«..1020..1,3091,3101,3111,312..1,3201,330..»

matomo tracker