Page 137«..1020..136137138139..150160..»

Jury selection wraps in Pittsburgh synagogue massacre with testimony expected Tuesday – ABC News

Posted By on May 26, 2023

  1. Jury selection wraps in Pittsburgh synagogue massacre with testimony expected Tuesday  ABC News
  2. Jury set for Pittsburgh synagogue shooting trial  Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
  3. Jury selection concludes in trial for Pittsburgh synagogue shooter who killed 11  Fox News

Read the rest here:

Jury selection wraps in Pittsburgh synagogue massacre with testimony expected Tuesday - ABC News

What is Judaism? – Center for Religious & Spiritual Life – Gettysburg.edu

Posted By on May 24, 2023

In his book Basic Judaism, Rabbi Milton Steinberg notes that the word Judaism has two distinct meanings. First, Judaism points to a multifaceted, complete civilization: the total history of the Jewish people that includes both sacred and secular elements. This definition is not linked to one specific ethnic identity, nor does it have one single geographical location. Instead, it incorporates a complex pattern of interwoven nationalities, cultures, and practices. Perhaps the most important point to underscore here is that Judaism is not a raceinsofar as that term is even used any more. Instead, just like Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, and Muslims, Jews come in all colors, physical characteristics, and nationalities.

Second, the word Judaism also describes the spiritual aspect of that civilization: Jewish religious practices and beliefs. In describing the Jewish religion, Steinberg goes on to say that it is made up of no less than seven strands: doctrine, ethics, rites and customs, laws, a sacred literature, institutions, and the people Israel.

Judaism today is descended from Rabbinic Judaism, that is, the Judaism that emerged after the destruction of the second temple by the Romans in 70 ce. This form of Judaism was centered around the Torah and the synagogue, instead of the temple. From the first century ce until the nineteenth century, there was basically only one way of being Jewish, and for the most part, by choice or not, it consisted of a life lived separated from the larger society.

With the growing secularization in nineteenth-century Western Europe, however, Jews became more active participants in secular society, even while maintaining their sacred practices and beliefs. Different interpretations of Judaism developed that guided the interplay between these sacred and secular worlds. Over time, these differences resulted in the four main branches of Judaism that exist today.

Orthodox Judaism is the modern term for what historically has been mainline Judaism: in other words, before the nineteenth century, Orthodox Judaism was Judaism, plain and simple. It is based on an understanding of the Torah as the unchangeable, inerrant revelation of God that provides the sole guide for all aspects of ones daily life. Accordingly, Orthodox Jews meticulously observe Jewish law, that is, halakhah (literally the way one walks), which is based on an understanding that all 613 commandments within the Torah have been revealed as the direct, immutable will of God.

Reform Judaism emerged during the Enlightenment as some sought to reform Jewish thought and practice in light of new scientific developments, political ideas, and modernism. While Orthodox Judaism considers the Torah the unchanging divine command of God, Reform Judaism sees the Torah as written by divinely inspired human authors. The Torahand the commandments thereinis regarded as instructional and inspirational, but not absolutely binding. Reform Judaism emphasizes obligation to the neighbor, care for the world, and the injunction to offer hospitality and care to all in need. All other aspects of Judaism are open to negotiation.

Conservative Judaism was founded as a response to what were viewed as overly radical changes in Reform Judaism: it was believed that while change was needed, Reform Judaism had moved too far too quickly. Conservative Judaism emphasizes on ritual practice, rather than specific doctrines. One of the distinguishing marks of Conservative Judaism, as opposed to Reform Judaism, is its preservation of the halakhic process when deciding how traditional interpretation of Jewish law might be changed. In that process, rabbis consult sacred scriptures and commentaries, rabbinic codes of law, and previous generations of rabbinical opinion, in order to craft a new reading for today.

Reconstructionist Judaism is the most recent to emerge. It holds that what is important about Judaism is not that everyone believes the same things about divine revelation, miracles, and God, or that people follow Jewish law in the same way. Instead, it sees the value of Judaism first as a cultural force uniting, supporting, and nurturing the Jewish people over time and space. As such, everything is open to debate and modificationall beliefs, all doctrines, all practicesaccording to the current needs of the Jewish community. Tradition is important as a way of maintaining community, but it has only a voice, not a vetoand, of course, there are many different views about how much of a vote tradition should have in any specific decision about Jewish life.

Taken as a whole, the Tanakh is the name of the Hebrew scriptures. The name is an acronym for the three sections of scripture, Torah, Neviim, and Kethuvim. Torah, also called the Pentateuch, includes the books of Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. Neviim, or prophets, includes the eight books of Joshua, Judges, Samuel, Kings, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and the Twelve. Finally, Kethuvim is the name for the writings, a collection of books, canonized last and used for a wide variety of purposes. This is the full list of books contained in this section: Psalms, Proverbs, Job, a group called the five scrollsthe five short books of the Song of Songs, Ruth, Lamentations, Ecclesiastes, and Esther, each of which is read for a specific Jewish holidayand finally Daniel, Ezra-Nehemiah, and Chronicles. In Jewish tradition, Ezra and Nehemiah historically are viewed as one book, as is Chronicles.

The Sabbath: The heart and soul of Jewish practice is the weekly celebration of the Sabbath. The laws governing the Sabbath are meant to establish a day of physical rest (the Sabbath is for the body as well as the soul) and spiritual renewal, in which one may restore relationships with God, within the family, and within the community. For this reason labor is prohibited on the Sabbathdoing business, shopping, doing housework, using electricity, etc. These proscriptions, however, are seen as gifts, not punishments, for they set aside the sacred time in which life can flourish, nurtured by prayer and contemplation, rest and reflection, laughter and joy. The life of every Jew, every Jewish family, and every Jewish community revolves around the Sabbath.

The Days of Awe: The most sacred Jewish holidays are called the Days of Awe, the high holy days of Rosh Hashanah, which marks the New Year in Judaism, and Yom Kippur, which is the Day of Atonement. Yom Kippur is the culmination of the season, and it is a twenty-five-hour day of solemn prayer, repentance, and strict fasting. During that day, forgiveness is sought from God and from others for the transgressions of the past year, in order to purify and prepare oneself for the coming year.

Passover: Another important holiday is Passover, which commemorates the deliverance of the Hebrews out of slavery in Egypt. The major event of Passover is the Seder, a special meal in which special foods are eaten, special songs are sung, and a special book is used. This book is called the haggadah, and it contains the passages from the Bible as well as rabbinic interpretation that explains the significance of the celebration and describes the rituals that are to be performed throughout the course of the evening.

Basic Judaism, by Rabbi Milton Steinberg Living Judaism, by Rabbi Wayne Dosick Introduction to Judaism: A Sourcebook, by Lydia Kukoff An Introduction to Judaism, by Nicholas de Lange Judaism: A Very Short Introduction, by Norman Solomon The Way of Torah: An Introduction to Judaism, by Jacob Neusner The Sabbath, by Abraham Joshua Heschel Night, by Elie Wiesel The Sunflower, by Simon Wiesenthal

Read more:

What is Judaism? - Center for Religious & Spiritual Life - Gettysburg.edu

Removal of Nazi Symbols From School’s Sound of Music’ Performance Draws Mixed Reaction – NBC Southern California

Posted By on May 24, 2023

Removal of Nazi Symbols From School's Sound of Music' Performance Draws Mixed Reaction  NBC Southern California

More:
Removal of Nazi Symbols From School's Sound of Music' Performance Draws Mixed Reaction - NBC Southern California

Senate Unanimously Passes Rosen-led Resolution Recognizing Jewish …

Posted By on May 24, 2023

WASHINGTON, DC Last night, the U.S. Senate unanimously passed a bipartisan resolution recognizing Jewish Heritage American Month. The resolution, introduced by Senators Jacky Rosen (D-NV), Tim Scott (R-SC), Ben Cardin (D-MD), and Rick Scott (R-FL), and cosponsored by 33 Senators, celebrates the many contributions of Jewish Americans to the United States and calls on elected officials, faith leaders, and civil society leaders to condemn and combat any and all acts of antisemitism.

At a time of rising antisemitism, its important to honor and celebrate the impact Jewish Americans have had on our countrys history and culture, said Senator Rosen. Im glad the Senate has passed this resolution to encourage Americans to learn more about the contributions of Jewish Americans. Let us continue working to build a more inclusive, welcoming nation where Jewish Americans can proudly express their faith and identity.

Todays unanimous passage of our Jewish American Heritage Resolution is a strong declaration of support during a time where antisemitic rhetoric and incidents are at an all-time high, said Senator Cardin. Together, we are embodying the Jewish value, Tikkun Olam, which in Hebrew means repairing the world. I am proud of our resolution and my faith, which has helped inspire and guide my life in public service.

I am proud to see the passage of our resolution recognizing Jewish American Heritage Month and honoring the wonderful contributions of Jewish Americans to our great nation, said Senator Rick Scott. While it is important to set aside this time to honor the Jewish people, we must also commit to standing resolutely with them every day while shining a light on and condemning anti-Semitism of any kind. In Florida, we are blessed to be home to many vibrant Jewish communities and I will continue my work with leaders at the local, state and federal level to support them and their right to live safely and pursue their American Dream.

Jewish Americans are a vibrant part of our nations history, and their extraordinary accomplishments have pushed America forward as a beacon of hope, faith, and freedom, said Senator Tim Scott. I am proud to stand with the Jewish community, especially as despicable antisemitism is on the rise. We must reaffirm our commitment to not only calling out this hate, but crushing it wherever it rears its ugly head.

As a co-founder of the Senate Bipartisan Task Force for Combating Antisemitism, Senator Rosen has been leading the fight against antisemitism in the United States and around the world. Recently, Senator Rosen introduced the bipartisan Holocaust Education and Antisemitism Lessons (HEAL) Act to strengthen Holocaust education at public schools. In 2020, Senator Rosens bipartisan Never Again Education Act was signed into law, establishing a federal fund through the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum to provide teachers with resources and training necessary to teach students the important lessons of the Holocaust.

###

Go here to read the rest:

Senate Unanimously Passes Rosen-led Resolution Recognizing Jewish ...

What Should Christians Know about Zionism?

Posted By on May 24, 2023

Zionism is defined as the Jewish national movement of self-determination in the land of Israel the historical birthplace and biblical homeland of the Jewish people. This national movement is very important for Christians to be familiar with and be knowledgeable about. Zionism is growing today, and it is expected to grow in the coming years.

Zionism is a national movement to get Jews back to their homeland of Zion (Israel) while maintaining and exercising governmental, political, and authoritarian power over the nation. Supporters of Zionism are known as Zionists and they strive to redevelop a national Jewish presence in the land of Zion.

The roots of Zionism include religious beliefs as well as political matters. Throughout the past and even stretching into the modern-day, strong anti-Semitism exists in the hearts of many people. Anti-Semitism means a person has strong hatred and hostility toward the Jewish people.

The truth of anti-Semitism can be seen in individuals holding a negative view of Jews as well as it can stretch to other inhabitants overtaking the Jews' land. In the modern-day, many biblical sites and landmarks have been overtaken by Muslims and the Islamic followers prevent anyone from going to these holy sites.

Muslims have even been known to destroy sacred Jewish artifacts, buildings, and burial grounds. Despite the growing anti-Semitism across different people groups, it is vital for Christians to remember that God did choose Israel as His chosen people (Deuteronomy 14:2) and He does promise to bless the Jews in the future (Romans 11:25-32).

I do not want you to be ignorant of this mystery, brothers and sisters, so that you may not be conceited: Israel has experienced a hardening in part until the full number of the Gentiles has come in, and in this way all Israel will be saved. As it is written: The deliverer will come from Zion; he will turn godlessness away from Jacob. And this is my covenant with them when I take away their sins (Romans 11:25-27).

There are two strong components to Zionism, the religious movement, and the political movement. The political movement is what first started Zionism and then it later developed into a religious movement. Theodor Herzl was the man who first established Zionism as a political movement in 1897 (Ibid.).

Herzl himself was an Austro-Hungarian Jew, who had the strong desire to restore the Jewish people to their rightful homeland of Zion. He wrote a detailed pamphlet in 1896 explaining the necessity of Zionism, which he titled Der Judenstaat (The Jewish State) (Theodor Herzl, My Jewish Learning,2021).

Herzl advocated in Der Judenstaat that the Jewish nation would not be able to survive unless they had a nation of their own. At the time of Herzls writing in 1896, the land of Palestine was where he believed the true home of the Jewish nation belonged and that according to the Hebrew Scriptures, the Jewish people rightfully owned this area of land (Ibid.).

Herzl never saw the achievement of his goal as he died in 1904, which was a great number of years beforeIsrael was truly recognized as its own state by the United Nations.

The Balfour Declaration was crafted in 1917 by British Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour, who wrote to Baron Rothschild and Balfour poured out his heart to Rothschild and told him that the British government firmly supported the notion of the Jews establishing their homeland in Palestine.

This letter, later coined as The Balfour Declaration, grew to be included within the 1923 Mandate for Palestine, which allowed the United Kingdom to have the responsibility to establish a national homeland for the Jews as Palestine was under British rule in the 1920s (Ibid.). However, the Jewish national homeland was not established right away in the 1920s.

World War II came on the scene in September 1939 and lasted until September 1945. During the Second World War, the Jews were intensively persecuted by the German Nazis. Adolf Hitler hated the Jews and desired for all of them to be killed, which he massively did through concentration camps and death camps spread across Europe.

Jews during this time were widely persecuted and murdered because of their ethnicity and religious beliefs. There were 75 million people killed during World War II and out of the 75 million, six million European Jews were killed in the Holocaust.

After the end of the Holocaust in 1945, national Zionists were dedicated and passionate about restoring a Jewish homeland that would be safe for the Jews. Zionists were finally granted their long-awaited request in 1948, in which Israel was declared its own state. Shortly after Israel was declared its own nation, Jews from all over the world flocked to their national homeland.

In the year 1949, nearly 250,000 Jews immigrated to Israel, which is now recognized as the largest number of inhabitants to immigrate to a land in a single year in modern history (Ibid.). As of 2021, 74.8% of all inhabitants of Israel are Jews. It is without a doubt to conclude that Zionism has impacted Jews and the world.

Within the current state of Zionism, there are left and right Zionists, somewhat reflecting liberal and non-liberal views of Judaism.

Zionists who lean toward the left are more liberal and are willing to forfeit some of the Israel-controlled land in order to obtain peace with the surrounding Arab nation. The left Zionists are not passionate about the beliefs found in the sacred Jewish texts.

Zionists who lean toward the right are more religious in their Judaism and stress the importance of an Israeli government based upon the Jewish customs, traditions, and beliefs as found in the Jewish sacred texts (Ibid.).

Even though there is disagreement with the Zionists in the modern-day, the end goal of the political side of Zionism has been completed. Israel has been erected once again as the national homeland of the Jews; however, in the future, God will ultimately restore Israel with all of the spiritual blessings as promised in the Old Testament.

As believers, we need to follow the truth of the Bible and adhere to its teachings. A person may have strong prejudices towards the Jews for their part in the crucifixion of our Lord Jesus, but Jesus does not want Christians to hate Jews.

All people have sinned (Romans 3:23), which means we are all equally responsible for Jesus death. The Lord wants us to extend love, mercy, and forgiveness to all people including the Jews.

This righteousness is given through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe. There is no difference between Jew and Gentile, for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and all are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus (Romans 3:22-24).

Within the study of theology, there are dispensationalists who agree with the Zionistic teaching of Israel being the rightful home of the Jews. Dispensationalism teaches that God will once again restore the Jews to their promised homeland with all the future blessings promised in the past (Jeremiah 32; Ezekiel 34).

For further reading:

Anti-Semitism, the Oldest Hatred

What Is the Importance of Israel?

If You Hate Jews, You Hate Jesus

What Is the Biblical Significance of Mount Zion?

Photo Credit: iStock/Getty Images Plus/Luke_Franzen

Vivian Brickerloves Jesus, studying the Word of God, and helping others in their walk with Christ. She has earned a Bachelor of Arts and Master's degree in Christian Ministry with a deep academic emphasis in theology. Her favorite things to do are spending time with her family and friends, reading, and spending time outside. When she is not writing, she is embarking on other adventures.

More:
What Should Christians Know about Zionism?

SYNAGOGUE – JewishEncyclopedia.com

Posted By on May 24, 2023

These episodes in the history of the synagogue in Christian countries have had very few parallels in Mohammedan lands, although the rule of Islam also began with an edict against the synagogue. It was decreed in the "pact of Omar" (see Jew. Encyc. vi. 655, s.v. Islam) that in those countries which should be conquered no new synagogues might be built, nor old ones repaired. The calif Al-Mutawakkil confirmed this decree in the ninth century, and commanded all synagogues to be transformed into mosques. The Egyptian calif Al-akim (d. 1020) also destroyed synagogues, and many were razed inAfrica and Spain by the fury of the Almohades (after 1140). The great synagogue of Jerusalem was destroyed in 1473, although the Jews were soon permitted to rebuild it. In eastern Mohammedan countries the names of Biblical personages or of representatives of tradition (e.g., a tanna or amora) were given to many synagogues. The following examples are taken from Benjamin of Tudela ("Itinerary"), from the list of tombs compiled for R. Jehiel of Paris (1240), and from a similar list entitled "Eleh ha-Massa'ot"; the two last-named sources are appended to Grnhut's edition of Benjamin of Tudela (pp. 140-160). Some examples are found also in Pethahiah's itinerary, and in Sambari's chronicle of the year 1682, printed in Neubauer, "M. J. C." i. In the following list the name "Sambari" precedes the page numbers of citations from this latter source; all other references are to the pages of Grnhut's edition of Benjamin of Tudela's "Itinerary."

In the village of Jaujar, in Egypt, there was a synagogue named in honor of the prophet Elijah, since Phinehas b. Eleazar was born there (Sambari, p. 121; Phinehas = Elijah; see Jew. Encyc. v. 122). The synagogue of the Palestinians at Fostat was also called after Elijah; the prophet Jeremiah was said to have prayed there (Sambari, p. 118; p. 137); and there were other synagogues of Elijah at Damascus (p. 157, "between the gardensa very splendid edifice "), Byblus (p. 158, "an extraordinarily splendid edifice "), Laodicea (p. 158), and ama (p. 159), while Grtz believed ("Gesch." 1st ed., v. 53) that there was a synagogue of Elijah also in Sicily, at the time of Pope Gregory I. Benjamin found a "Keneset Mosheh" outside the city of Fostat (p. 94). According to Sambari (p. 119; comp. p. 137), the name of "Kanisat Musa" was given to the synagogue of Damwah (see Jew. Encyc. v. 64, s.v. Egypt), in which Moses himself was said to have prayed (comp. Ex. ix. 29), and in which, on the 7th of Adar, the Jews of all Egypt assembled, during the period of the Nagids, for fasting and prayer. One of the three synagogues of Aleppo was called after Moses (p. 158). Benjamin mentions synagogues named in honor of Ezra at Laodicea (= Kalneh; comp. Sambari, p. 158), Haran, and Jazirat ibn Omar, on the upper Tigris, the first one having been built, he was told, by Ezra himself (pp. 47 et seq.). Pethahiah mentions two synagogues built by Ezra at Nisibis. There was a synagogue at Ezra s tomb, and one near the grave of the prophet Ezekiel; the latter was said to have been built by King Jehoiachin ("Itinerary," ed. Benisch, pp. 61, 68). In the province of Mosul (Ashur), Benjamin (p. 48) saw the synagogues of the three prophets Obadiah, Jonah, and Nahum. The tomb of Daniel at Susa and the graves of Mordecaiand Esther (pp. 68, 75, Pethahiah) were placed in front of synagogues, and Benjamin (p. 41) mentions a synagogue near Tiberias named in honor of Caleb, the son of Jephunnehapparently the synagogue built, according to Pethahiah's itinerary, by Joshua, the son of Nun.

At Ramlah (Rama) the Christians found the tomb of Samuel beside the synagogue (p. 39, Benjamin), while at Kafr Jubar, near Damascus, there was a synagogue built, according to legend, by Elisha (Sambari, p. 152). Among the Tannaim the name of Simeon b. Yoai was given to two synagogues, one at Meron (pp. 141, 154) and the other at Kafr Bir'im (p. 154, "a very splendid edifice, built of large stones with great pillars"; see above). At Damascus, according to Benjamin, there was a synagogue of Eleazar b. 'Arak (Pethahiah says Eleazar b. Azariah), and at Nisibis one of Judah b. Bathyra. Several Babylonian synagogues mentioned by Benjamin were named in honor of amoraim: the synagogues of Rab, Samuel, Isaac, Nappaa, Rabba, Mar ashisha, Ze'era b. ama, Mari, Mer (at Hillah), Papa, Huna, Joseph, and Joseph b. ama (pp. 60, 61, 63, 65). All these synagogues stood at the graves of the amoraim whose names they bore.

These examples show that the synagogues bearing the names of Biblical or Talmudic celebrities were often similar in character to the "ubbah" (vault; Hebr. ) regularly built over the grave of a Mohammedan saint, and serving as an oratory for the pilgrims to the tomb. Similar ubbahs were erected, according to Benjamin (p. 63), over the graves of Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah, the three friends of Daniel, near the tomb of Ezekiel. In his commentary on Job xxi. 32 Ibn Ezra states that Hai Gaon explained the word "gadish" as the "ubbah over the grave, according to the custom in Mohammedan countries."

Some of the synagogues mentioned in the sources quoted above are described as buildings of exceptional beauty, although statements to that effect are rarely found elsewhere. It is also quite noteworthy that Benjamin of Tudela does not praise the architecture of any synagogue in the European countries through which he traveled; but it must be borne in mind that the cities of Spain were not included in his descriptions. According to Judah al-arizi, there were several magnificent synagogues at Toledo, second to none, among them being the splendid edifice built by Joseph b. Solomon ibn Shoshan (Grtz, "Gesch." 3d ed., vi. 189). The synagogue of Samuel Abulafia at Toledo and other Spanish synagogues still standing have been mentioned above. Bagdad contained twenty-eight, according to Benjamin of Tudela (Pethahiah says thirty), in addition to the synagogue of the exilarch, which is described by Benjamin as a "building resting on marble columns of various colors and inlaid with gold and silver, with verses from the Psalms inscribed in golden letters upon the pillars. The approach to the Ark was formed by ten steps, and on the upper one sat the exilarch together with the princes of the house of David." The anonymous itinerary mentioned above, in referring to the synagogue which the author saw at Tyre, describes it as "a large and very fine building" (Benjamin of Tudela, ed. Grnhut, p. 158).

The synagogue of Worms, built in the eleventh century (see A. Epstein, "Jdische Alterthmer in Worms und Speier," Breslau, 1896), and the Altneue Synagogue of Prague are the two oldest structures of their kind which still exist in Europe, and are of interest both historically and architecturally. The five Roman synagogues built under one roof formed until recently a venerable architectural curiosity. The great synagogue of Amsterdam, dedicated in 1675, is a monument both to the faith of the Hispano-Portuguese Maranos and to the religious freedom which Holland was the first to grant to the modern Jews; a similar monument is the Bevis Marks Synagogue, London, which was dedicated in 1701 (see Gaster, "History of the Ancient Synagogue," London, 1901).

Special reference must be made to the wooden synagogues built in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries in some Polish cities, many of them being markedly original in style. They also attest the wealth and culture of the Polish Jews before the year 1548 (see M. Bersohn, "Einiges ber die Alten Holzsynagogen in Polen," in "Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft fr Jdische Volkskunde," 1901, viii. 159-183; 1904, xiv. 1-20). Bodenschatz, in the middle of the eighteenth century, stated that "rather handsome and large synagogues are found in Germany, especially in Hamburg, and also among the Portuguese, as well as in Prague, particularly in the Polish quarter, besides Frth and Bayersdorf; but the Dutch synagogues are more splendid than all the rest" ("Die Kirchliche Verfassung der Juden," ii. 35).

In the nineteenth century the great changes which ushered in a new epoch in the history of the civic and intellectual status of the European Jews affected also the style and the internal life of the synagogue, especially as religious reform proceeds primarily from that institution, and is chiefly concerned with synagogal worship. A private synagogue at Berlin (1817) became the first "seminary for young Jewish preachers" (Grtz, "Gesch." xi. 415); while the synagogue of the Reform-Tempel-Verein at Hamburg (1818) was the first to introduce radical innovations in the ritual of public worship, thereby causing a permanent schism in Judaism, both in Germany and elsewhere. These reforms likewise influenced the arrangement of the synagogue itself. The introduction of the organ, the shifting of the almemar from the center of the building to a position just in front of the Ark, the substitution of stationary benches for movable desks, and the abolition of the high lattices for women, were important from an architectural point of view. The chief factors which promoted and determined the construction of new synagogues were the emancipation of the Jews from the seclusion of the ghetto, their increasing refinement of taste, and their participation in all the necessities and luxuries of culture. Internal causes, however, which were not always unmixed blessings, were the prime agents in the increased importance of the synagogue. As the external observances of religion and the sanctity of tradition lost in meaning and often disappeared entirely within the family and in the life of the individual, the synagogue grew in importance as a center for the preservation of Judaism. It thus becomes explicable why the religious attitude of both large and small communities in Europe and America appears most of all in the arrangement and the care of the synagogues; and it is not mere vanity and ostentation, which lead communities on both sides of the Atlantic to make sacrifices in order to build splendid edifices for religious purposes, such as are found in many cities.

The increasing importance which the synagogue has thus acquired in modern Jewish life is, consequently, justified from a historical point of view, both because it is a development of the earliest institution of the Diasporaone which it has preserved for two thousand yearsand because it is the function of the synagogue to maintain the religious life and stimulate the concept of Judaism within the congregation. The synagogue has in the future, as it has had in the past, a distinct mission to fulfil for the Jews.

No mention is made in the Talmud of any tax for the building of synagogues; but the Tosefta to B. B. i. 6, as reported by Alfasi, says: "The men of a city urge one another to build a synagogue [] and to buy a book of the Law, the Prophets, and the Hagiographa" (see "Yad," Tefillah, xi.; Shulan 'Aruk, Ora ayyim, 150, 151). The codes teach, further, on the strength of a saying ascribed to Rab (Shab. 11a), that the building should stand in the highest part of the town (comp. Prov. i. 21) and rise above all surrounding edifices. Of course, this rule can not always be carried out where the Jews live as a small minority in a town of Gentiles; but a synagogue should never occupy the lower part of a house which contains bedrooms in an upper story. According to a tosefta, the doors of the synagogue should be in the east; but the opinion has prevailed that they should be opposite the Ark and in that part of the room toward which the worshipers face in prayer. The Ark is built to receive the scrolls of the Law. "They put a platform in the middle of the house," says Maimonides, "so that he who reads from the Law, or he who speaks words of exhortation to the people, may stand upon it, and all may hear him" (see Almemar). According to the same author, the elders sit facing the people, who are seated in rows one behind the other, all with their eyes turned toward the elders and toward the Holy Place (neither code speaks in this connection of the women's gallery). When the "messenger of the congregation" arises in prayer he stands on the floor before the Ark (this, however, is not the custom among the Sephardim of the present time). In the Holy Land, in Syria, Babylonia, and North Africa, etc., the floor is spread with matting, on which the worshipers sit; but in the countries of Christendom they occupy chairs or benches.

Honor should be paid to synagogues and houses of study. People must not conduct themselves lightly nor laugh, mock, discuss trifles, or walk about therein; in summer they must not resort to it for shelter from the heat, nor in winter should they make it serve as a retreat from the rain. Neither should they eat or drink therein, although the learned and their disciples may do so in case of an emergency. Every one before entering should wipe the mud from his shoes; and no one should come in with soiled body or garments. Accounts must not be cast in the synagogue or house of study, except those pertaining to public charity or to religious matters. Nor should funeral speeches be delivered therein, except at a public mourning for one of the great men of the time. A synagogue or house of study which has two entrances should not be used as a thoroughfare; this rule was made in analogy with that in the Mishnah (Ber. ix. 5) forbidding the use of the Temple mount as a thoroughfare.

Some honor is to be paid even to the ruins of a synagogue or house of study. It is not proper to demolish a synagogue and then to build a new one either on the same spot or elsewhere; but the new one should be built first (B. B. 3b), unless the walls of the old one show signs of falling. A synagogue may be turned into a house of study, but not viceversa; for the holiness of the latter is higher than that of the former, and the rule is (Meg. iii. 1): "They raise up in holiness, but do not lower in holiness."

The synagogue of a village, being built only for the people around it, may be sold on a proper occasion; but a synagogue in a great city, which is really built for all Israelites who may come and worship in it, ought not to be sold at all. When a small community sells its synagogue, it ought to impose on the purchaser the condition that the place must not be turned into a bath-house, laundry, cleansing-house (for vessels), or tannery, though a council of seven of the leading men in the community may waive even this condition (ib. 27b).

See the original post here:

SYNAGOGUE - JewishEncyclopedia.com

The Hasidic Community’s Reckoning Over COVID-19 – The Atlantic

Posted By on May 22, 2023

A few weeks ago, Reuven went to a party. It was indoors. No one wore masks. No one who attended was in any rush to get a vaccine. Reuven and his wife were uncomfortable. But if they hadnt gone, his relatives would have felt as if he were judging them for gathering, and they judge me back, he told me. I have to weigh my options. Reuvens parents and siblings roll their eyes when he constantly talks about their risk of getting sick, just as he did at the beginning of the pandemic. Hes meshige far corona, they say. Crazy about the virus.

The Yiddish-speaking, Hasidic Jewish world that Reuven inhabits is intensely communal. Men crowd into synagogues in his Brooklyn neighborhood to pray together three times a daymorning, afternoon, and night. Many large families share small apartments or rowhouses, where they stage elaborate meals each week on Shabbat and during the Jewish calendars many holidays, filling their homes with scrambling kids and occasionally the cousins and uncles who live just blocks away. Orthodox Jews in New York are distinctly vulnerable to the virus for many of the same reasons low-income Black and Latino neighborhoods have been hit hard: crowded living spaces, lack of public-health infrastructure, jobs that require in-person work. For many people in these communities, sealing themselves inside their apartments for a year simply wasnt possible. Reuven knows this; he doesnt fault the Hasidim for the way they live. We shouldn't be judged merely on the fact that we feel that some forms of gatherings are important to us, even during a pandemic, he told me. Whats so disappointing and depressing, and even shocking, is the fact that we chose to do all this with zero precautions, for which there is absolutely no excuse.

New York papers have published plenty of criticism of the Hasidic communitys disregard for COVID-19 safety, covering secretive weddings, massive funerals, and violent anti-lockdown protests. Far less common is pushback like Reuvens, from within the Hasidic world. This spring, his small, independent Yiddish-language magazinecalled Der Veker, meaning One Who Awakenspublished an investigative report on how the COVID-19 death rates in Hasidic neighborhoods compared with those in other parts of New York State. Based on death notices posted by an establishment Hasidic paper, Der Yid, Reuven and his colleagues concluded that the death rate in their community was three to four times higher than the state average. The number of deaths could have been lower, Der Veker implied, if Hasidic leaders had encouraged their followers to take more precautionsand modeled that behavior themselves. Most Hasidim believe that complaining about the community, especially to outsiders, is like washing your dirty laundry in public. There is no mechanism for self-criticism, Reuven said. Hasidic Jews who follow particular rabbis are accustomed to heeding their leaders guidance without question, and those rabbis often crack down on criticism from within their ranks. Reuven worries that speaking out might exacerbate the anti-Semitism the community already faces. But after a brutal year filled with dying, Reuven wants a reckoningone that will happen, he believes, only under external pressure.

Most Americans would find Reuvens Brooklyn world foreign. But some people might recognize his dilemma, especially if they live in other communities where the risk of contracting the coronavirus is high and regard for restrictions is low. How could a community that prides itself on generosity and kindness fail to protect its most vulnerable members from a deadly pandemic?

On a recent Friday afternoon before Shabbat, I visited a bakery in the heart of Borough Parks Hasidic area. Men in black coats circulated busily through the small storefront, collecting pastries and braided loaves of challah to eat that evening, children snaking through their legs. At the time, COVID-19 rates in New York City were roughly as high as they had been during some weeks of the first wave of the pandemic last spring. We all stood in line, shoulder to shoulder, raising our voices to give our orders to three women from outside of the community who stood behind the counter, wearing jeans and black masks. Among the other customers, I didnt see a single mask.

I met Reuven on a brutally cold spring morning, one more intolerable day after an endless winter. Hed requested a spot in Brooklyns rambling Prospect Park, not for its convenience, but for its inconvenience. Reuven is not his real name; its a pseudonym he chose. A handful of other Hasidim help him edit and publish Der Vekers thick copies a couple of times a year, but his real identity is unknown to most contributors. Most of Reuvens own family members dont know that he runs Der Veker. If people find out Im behind it, the consequences can be extremely harsh, he told me. He worries that his kids would get kicked out of their yeshivas, or Jewish schools; that he would lose his job; that his marriage would collapse from the stress. As we walked, he kept directing us farther toward the interior of the park, away from the street, in case someone he knows happened to drive by. We passed an elderly couple, a man in a yarmulke and a woman in the kind of wig many Orthodox women wear. Reuven didnt know them, but he instantly stopped speaking, moving away from me to pretend that we werent there together. He made me promise to write that I had approached Der Veker, not the other way around. Even anonymously, he doesnt want to be known as someone who spoke badly of his community.

With a few notable exceptions, secular societys understanding of Hasidim is shaped by the accounts of people who have left it. Popular television shows such as Unorthodox portray the community as oppressive and harsh, filtered through the perspective of those who could not or did not want to subsume their identity into collective religious life. This is not Reuvens experience. He believes that many people in the outside world are lost and isolated; he loves that his neighbors routinely raise thousands of dollars to pay for poor Hasidic brides wedding dresses, and that everyone has the number for the communitys volunteer ambulance corps saved in their phone. Its hard to tackle life when you dont have this kind of safety net, he said. This is the type of luxury we grow up with, and some of us dont even realize how amazing it is. As joggers in brightly colored leggings and expensive sneakers streamed around us like schools of fish, Reuven knew he stood out in his dark overcoat and hat, his long curly sideburns, called peyos, swinging alongside his blue surgical mask. Even though he disagrees with how his community has handled the coronavirus pandemic, he still feels judgment targeted at him.

Read: Orthodox Jewish women are facing an impossible choice right now

Hasidic rabbis who have made public appearances over the past year or spoken about the pandemic have often been defiant. As the first wave hit in New York City last spring, the Satmar rebbe of Kiryas Joel, a Hasidic village roughly 50 miles north of Manhattan, swore he wouldnt shut down schools. Secular people have a family of two or three children, with an apartment with a room for TV, a room for videos, entertainment, and when everyone is not going to school theyll manage at home, he said. Hasidic children have many siblings and sleep in rooms crowded with cots; if they stayed home from school, theyd be out in the streets around other people anyway. A goyish head does not understand this, he said, using the Yiddish version of a Hebrew word that describes non-Jews, which often carries a derogatory connotation. Rabbi Moishe Indig, a representative of the Satmar community of Kiryas Joel, told me that the rebbe had not ignored the pandemic. He insisted that most Hasidic people had followed CDC guidelines during its early stages. People started loosening up only after two months, when a big percentage of the community had, already, the antibodies, he said. Reuven is not impressed by this argument. Even when people continued to die, they continued to claim that there is no need to do anything, because everyone already had it, he said. He felt that, after the first weeks of the pandemic, the rabbis didnt bother to talk directly about COVID-19 and continued with life as usual. If they had said, We believe the virus doesnt exist, or We believe some crazy, crackpot doctor, and we want to do whatever he says, you know, that would have been a little bit better, Reuven said. That [would have] meant that they thought about it.

Since he was a teenager, Reuven has hungered for an intellectual life beyond Jewish texts. In private, he voraciously consumed books about evolution written by Orthodox rabbis. (Did I say the word correctly? he asked, self-conscious about the English he obsessively reads and rarely speaks.) In his world, its a liability to become known as an oifgeklerter, or enlightened persona know-it-all, someone who thinks theyre better than everyone else. No one wants to teach the children of an oifgeklerter. No one wants to marry that persons kids.

Der Veker grew out of a desire for a literary forum that is both capacious and religious, where Yiddish speakers could, say, publish fiction or debate the communitys practice of not publishing pictures of women. The first edition came out in 2016, and some early issues sold six times as many copies as Reuven and his colleagues were expecting. One copy might be passed around to a dozen members of a family or a hundred boys in a yeshiva. Reuven has seen men in synagogue hide a copy of Der Veker in their prayer book to read during marathon services. In the Yiddish-speaking world, this is basically the only place in printnot online, but a physical publicationwhere you can find more critical perspectives that arent under the influence of an editor or a censor, Isaac Bleaman, an assistant professor of linguistics at UC Berkeley who has studied the Hasidic community, told me.

The latest cover of Der Veker features a man with a dark beard and long curls wearing a scarf swept over his shoulder and a velvety black hat. And there was a plague among the congregation of the Lord, reads the headline, printed in thick, red Hebrew lettering on a white surgical mask that covers his eyes. The editions main investigationnearly 30,000 words over 79 pagesargues that Hasidic Jews made choices that led to disproportionately high rates of illness and death compared with the rest of New York State. The article uses the decidedly secular language of bar charts and line graphs, crowded alongside passages of dense Yiddish text. I could not replicate their findingsthey are based on dozens of weeks worth of death notices published in Yiddishbut what matters is that Der Vekers writers wanted to quantify the effects of behavior they were seeing every day in their neighborhoods. Different Orthodox communities behaved in radically different ways, even among the highly observant Jews of Brooklyn. Der Vekers data are an attempt to precisely measure COVID-19 deaths in the distinct world of the Hasidim, where many people have claimed that the pandemic is fake or overstated.

What Reuven and his fellow writers agonize over most is the moral posture of the community. Would we not wear masks on the streets or in the synagogues for months on end if we thought that it would release even a single heimishe person from jail? the writers say, using the Yiddish word for a member of their community. Wouldnt we desist from shaking hands if we knew that it could save one Jew? So why are the lives of hundreds of our brethren, tens of them, so irrelevant that we will not do the least bit to reduce the chances of us infecting one another? Small things make Reuven deeply upset: Noticing that theres no soap in the synagogues for washing hands, or seeing few masks among large groups of praying men. The leader of one Hasidic group, called Bobov-45, made a public show of wearing a blue surgical mask on the afternoon before Yom Kippur in September, but a video shows that he took it off when he went inside a synagogue. A January edition of Der Yid described in rapturous detail the wedding of a grandson of Zalman Teitelbaum, the Satmar rebbe in Williamsburg and one of the most powerful Hasidic leaders in the world. It was as if attendees were caught up in an electric current when the rebbe appeared, the article says. He danced with the bride, the groom, and his in-laws, bobbing up and down with a religious ecstasy. Teitelbaum had tested positive for COVID-19 just seven days earlier, during the peak of New York Citys third wave.

Der Veker offers a litany of explanations for why Hasidim have mostly ignored public-health guidelines in recent months: a lack of statistical and scientific literacy, an inability to empathize with the suffering of non-Jews, a sense of being at war with the outside world. Reuven also attributed some of this attitude to the Trump effect and to the popularity of right-wing talk-radio hosts such as Mark Levin among Hasidim. Theres no sports in the Hasidic community, he said. Politics is our sport. Most of Brooklyn is deep blue, but in the Hasidic parts of Williamsburg, some precincts went 90 or 95 percent for Donald Trump in 2020. Even among the largely anti-Zionist Hasidim, many people believe Trump was good for Israel, and they appreciated the high-profile prison-sentence commutations he granted to several Orthodox Jews. The Trump administration reached out to Hasidic leaders during the early part of the pandemic, encouraging them to establish safety protocols. But Reuven believes that most Hasidim observed Trump not taking the virus seriously, and saw the pandemic as a joke. When Democratic leaders such as Mayor Bill de Blasio and Governor Andrew Cuomo singled out the Hasidim for condemnation, the backlash was intense. Many people in the community felt as though they were unfairly targeted, especially over the summer as large groups gathered for Black Lives Matter protests. De Blasio is viewed as Haman or somethingreally a villain, Reuven said.

Read: Measles can be contained. Anti-Semitism cannot.

Theoretically, Hasidic Jews are not supposed to use the internet, but many people covertly own a smartphone or install Wi-Fi in their homes. Some people think, If only people give [Hasidim] some internet, they would be able to see the light, see the informationreal information! But most of these people have the internet, and thats actually where they pick up the garbage, Reuven said. Its a common belief among Hasidim that Bill Gates designed the vaccines so that a GPS tracking device could be implanted in peoples arms; when Reuven challenged an acquaintance about this claim, he told me: Just Google it! Reuven said. Reuven subscribes to The Atlantic and, like many Americans, reads The New York Times on different browsers and devices so that he can get past the paywall. He tends to reply to emails within minutes and confidently uses Google Drive. But his acquaintance could not believe that Reuven didnt know about Gatess plot. He was telling me, You for sure dont have a smartphone.

But even if they wanted to, some Hasidim wouldnt be able to find the kind of information Der Veker hopes to spread in the community. Several Hasidic groups have created filters, which limit what their followers can see when they browse the web. A filter created by the Satmars, the biggest Hasidic community in Brooklyn, blocks the page where Der Veker is sold on Amazon.

A Jewish principle, called pikuach nefesh in Hebrew, instructs Jews to violate religious laws to save a life. The meaning is clear: The preservation of life takes precedence over almost everything else, even when that means you have to act in ways you would otherwise find unthinkable. The question of why Hasidic rabbis have not viewed COVID-19 as this kind of crisis is really the biggest question, Reuven said. Many religious communities, not just Orthodox Jewish ones, have determined that meeting for prayer is essential, even during a pandemicits not an optional leisure activity, but an indispensable part of daily life. You feel you have to gather, so gather, Reuven said. But wear masks. Why do you ignore everything? I dont understand. I cant answer that.

Read: How the pandemic defeated America

In areas of New York City, the pandemic has created a sense of collective pride: In the face of a deadly crisis, people banded together and gave up some of the most precious parts of daily life to stay safe and protect one another. People stopped seeing friends for dinner or visiting their grandchildren. Families missed funerals and canceled weddings and brought new babies home to apartments alone. Reuven experienced the opposite: Life continued as normal. Instead of pride, he feels shame. During the pandemic, he found his community indifferent about protecting people from COVID-19, unwilling to accept internal criticism, and hostile to the scientific debates he loves. So why, I asked, does he stay?

He laughed softly, as though he was surprised the answer wasnt obvious. The Hasidic community is my whole world. Its not my country; its my planet, he said. I cant hop off the planet and go to a different planet. Its the way I grew up, from the first minute I was born. He spent years building his Jewish knowledge. All of that would be effectively useless in the outside world. He would almost certainly lose his wife and kids, along with any connection to extended family and friends. I would lose myself, too, he said. Because I am a Hasidic Jew.

And yet, even though this is the place where he fits, the past year has shown how set apart he is from his community. Its indescribable. Its like living in a different reality, he said. How would you feel if everybody around you feels that the sky is pink? Maybe as Der Veker is passed from hand to hand, it will force people to rethink their choices. Maybe in another life, Reuven mused, he would have gone to college and become a scientist. But this is the life he has, if his community will help him keep it.

Read the original here:

The Hasidic Community's Reckoning Over COVID-19 - The Atlantic

How the haredi Orthodox are changing Israel

Posted By on May 22, 2023

This Q&A is adapted from one of four public conversations about the future of Israel being held every Wednesday at noon ET in a collaboration between JTA and theIsrael Democracy Institutein the lead-up to Israels March 23 elections. The program is being funded by the Marcus Foundation. To register for the upcoming sessions,please sign up here.

Israels haredi population is growing rapidly, with long-term political, economic and social consequences for the country.

How are haredim changing Israel, and how is Israel managing their integration into mainstream society? Does Israels experience hold any lessons for the American Jewish community?

The Q&A below, which has been condensed and lightly edited, was adapted from arecent public Zoom conversationfeaturing Gilad Malach, director of IDIs Ultra-Orthodox in Israel Program, which provides the Israeli government with policy proposals for integrating haredim into Israeli society while allowing them to preserve their unique identity, and Nechumi Yaffe, a researcher in the program and a faculty member at Tel Aviv Universitys Department of Public Policy.

This session was led by JTA Opinion Editor Laura Adkins.

JTA: What do we mean when we say haredi?

Yaffe: The main characteristic of the haredi community, a social group derived from an ideological movement that started in the 18thcentury, is segregation from the Western world. Once the Enlightenment started and Jews began drifting away from a religious lifestyle, the rabbis felt that the best way to maintain religious commitment was to segregate from the secular world. This segregation happens in different communities in different ways, and its constantly changing.

Malach: The central difference between the modern, secular world and ultra-Orthodox society is that the ultra-Orthodox are focused on the world to come: collecting mitzvot in this world for the Eternal Life. We believe there is progress in humanity, not just technological but in terms of growing equality and democracy and improving the world. But the haredi world believes in decline over generations. Ultra-Orthodox people focus on studying old, religious things, much of it written 2,000 years ago.

All over the world, ultra-Orthodox people live in enclave culture, with their own educational systems, community systems, even their own kashrut authorities, in order to be segregated.

In Israel, ultra-Orthodox society has become a society of learners: Most of the men study Torah most of their lives, which is different from elsewhere around the world. So in Israel, the haredi educational system doesnt include secular studies because they feel they dont need it, women participate in a high level in the labor market because someone needs to earn money for their families, and haredim need state support.

What are some of the characteristics that distinguish haredim from Israels national religious community?

Yaffe: Unlike in America, where the difference between haredim and Modern Orthodox is more of a spectrum on which people move according to their exposure to the world and adherence to halachic interpretation, in Israel the groups are very distinct, not just ideologically but geographically and culturally. A key component is their approach to the state. Religious Zionists see the State of Israel as an expression of their spiritual and religious life, a way to actualize their Jewishness. Many are very strict in their Torah study and halachic observance.

The haredi community, starting in Europe, was very skeptical toward Zionism, seeing it as antithetical to religious life. While haredi society is engaged with the state, it attaches no spiritual importance to it and to varying degrees does not respect it.

Malach: The other main distinction is their attitude toward modernity. The national religious, which can also be called Modern Orthodox, have a positive attitude toward modernity, to science. In ultra-Orthodox society, you need to listen to your rabbi not just in religious matters but also on how to vote in the Knesset. If the state says something about COVID restrictions, you listen to the rabbis. If you are Modern Orthodox, you listen to the expert.

What are some of the tensions between haredim and other Israelis over service in the Israel Defense Forces?

Malach: There were some haredim who served in Israels 1948 War of Independence. At that time, the political and spiritual leaders of the community asked Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion for an opportunity to allow yeshiva students to continue their studies. This was three years after the Holocaust, and Ben-Gurion said OK. At the time there were a few hundred. But ultra-Orthodox society quickly realized that many of those who serve in the army cease being religious, yet people who learn Torah dont just stay in the community but become more learned and religious than their parents. So the whole society shifted to yeshiva study over army service.

Secular and Modern Orthodox Israelis have a lot of anger that the ultra-Orthodox get this exemption from the army. This is one of the reasons were going to elections again and again, because of disagreement over a new draft law.

How can one be anti-Zionist or non-Zionist while still benefiting from the state?

Yaffe: Zionism as a movement started as a national endeavor that was very much aligned with European ideas about national movements at the time. Zionism was very much a secular endeavor. It wasnt a Jewish development, even though it used Jewish nostalgia and Jewish ideas. Rabbis saw it as a big threat to religious life because it was the source of a great drift away from religiousness at the time. Zionism was the first expression of Jewish identity that did not have a religious component. Zionism is still viewed by haredim as a threat to religious life.

Part of the reason why the haredi community is so against the army is because it embodies the idea that Jews fighting for independence enabled the return to Zion, not the Messiah coming on a donkey. It is a big conflict for a lot of religious people that very secular people established the state.

Haredim today view Zionism as an ongoing threat, even though they are stronger numerically and more religious than ever before. Every haredi views himself as at risk that the world is out to get him. Haredi literally means fearful, anxious. The feeling is that if we dont fight back and cling to segregation, were just going to be become secular.

To what extent is there resistance to following COVID-19 restrictions in haredi Israel, and is the resistance coming from the grassroots or leaders?

Yaffe: Im haredi. When COVID-19 started, a very big famous rabbi, who I thought was very misinformed, said, You dont stop learning Torah because some people think theres a danger. I think that laid the groundwork for this attitude that we dont have to obey the restrictions. All in all, a big part of the community not all the community; the haredi Sephardi-Mizrahi community very much kept the restrictions, and some of the Lithuanians as well but all in all the Hasidic world was just not following the health regulations.

Nechumi Yaffe, a professor at Tel Aviv University and a researcher at the Israel Democracy Institute, participates in a Zoom conversation hosted by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency and the IDI on haredim in Israel, Feb. 24, 2021. (JTA)

Malach: This is a very good example of the idea that from the ultra-Orthodox point of view, you need to obey the rabbis. They are the authority, not the state. Some Lithuanian yeshivish rabbis said education was of primary importance, so they continued Torah study. For some Hasidic communities, having weddings was the important thing, so they saw a need to continue that.

At the beginning, Israeli authorities thought maybe the lack of adherence to COVID-19 restrictions was a problem of lack of communication. But since then we realized its bigger than that. Its do we look at whats good for our community or the State of Israel? A lot of haredi communities said we know it might be dangerous, but we will pay a very high spiritual price if we are not gathering in synagogues or yeshivot or at weddings. So for us as a community its better to pray and pay this price. But they didnt think of the price the whole State of Israel pays in lockdowns and other economic costs. Most people in Israel are very upset about this.

Despite these tensions, haredi parties are part of nearly every governing coalition led by secular parties. Why?

Malach: The irony is that the haredim are the secular authority because theyre part of the government. The health minister for the first half year of COVID was an ultra-Orthodox man. These contradictions are very interesting.

The reason haredi parties are usually part of the coalition is that they arent very interested in left, right and center. They play the role of kingmaker. Their demands are not connected to classical political questions of Israels relationship with the Palestinians, or even economic issues. Specifically they are concerned with two things: the needs of the community and issues of religion and state. Haredim are almost always part of the governing coalition, right or left.

Why is Reform and Conservative Judaism generally sidelined by Israels religious establishment?

Yaffe: When the State of Israel was established, there was no alternative religious conception to Orthodox. This was how the game was originally established. And since the haredim are still the majority of religious Israelis, they still have the upper hand and they use it. They have the power.

I grew up haredi and heard all about how bad Reform is and how much worse it is than being secular or non-Jewish. But when I spent time in America and understand the culture better, I saw how much more nuanced and beautiful it is.

But in Israel were talking about a different culture. We live in the Middle East. Its a very religious neighborhood. And we dont have Indonesian-style Islam; we have ISIS as neighbors. Its not just the geographical location, its a state of mind. Its a very traditional mindset. Many Israelis, even nonharedim and secular, dont see Reform as representative of what Judaism is about. Im struck when even secular people tell me this. The Reform movement just doesnt speak to the Israeli culture.

Malach: The next election may bring a Reform rabbi to the Knesset for the first time; hes running in the Labor Party and has a realistic prospect of getting in. The haredim will ban him. They wont talk to him. You might ask: But youre both religious people. Ultra-Orthodox Knesset members communicate with the secular ones. But thats because the ultra-Orthodox are focused on religion. They wont even communicate with a Reform Knesset member who has a differing view on religion. It might be very interesting, especially if Labor is part of the coalition.

What are some of the biggest misconceptions about Israeli haredim?

Malach: The main issue when we as policymakers say that ultra-Orthodox society is a great challenge to the State of Israel is not about money the state spends on ultra-Orthodox society. Its about the very low percentage of ultra-Orthodox participation in the labor market coupled with their growing numbers. This has significant implications for Israels tax base. If 10% of Israelis live the way the ultra-Orthodox live, the state can handle that. But if its 25%, thats a great economic and even social challenge. The state will collect less taxes, and the state needs that money to pay for health, infrastructure, security.

Gilad Malach, director of the Ultra-Orthodox in Israel Program at the Israel Democracy Institute, participates in the Zoom conversation on Israeli haredim, Feb. 24, 2021. (JTA)

Because of their high birthrates, the haredi population is younger than average. Meanwhile, COVID-19 has accelerated the death rate among older haredim. What are some of the implications of this?

Yaffe: COVID does not really affect young people in a significant way, and the haredim are an extremely young community. I think this explains a big part of the cavalier attitude toward COVID among haredim. And while many rabbis have died, there are still plenty of rabbinic leaders and leaders in waiting.

One of the more notable aspects of COVID is that for the first time the haredi community its leaders, its rabbis, its politicians expressed self-criticism. Since the haredi community always tells itself were under attack, there is no self-criticism. But the way some community members behaved was so negligent that some people spoke up. They said these are not our values, this is not how we educate our children. This is a great development for the community because without criticism were never going to rectify our shortcomings.

Another thing that came out of COVID is wider use of the internet, since we started working from home and interacting on Zoom. This undermines the walls the haredi community has built around itself. It brings more complexity and nuance that might influence the community in a healthier way.

Malach: The economic challenges of the COVID period might cause more haredim to go and join the labor market or pursue higher education. And the internet is not just a way to get information, but makes it much easier to take the steps necessary to join the labor market.

The rest is here:

How the haredi Orthodox are changing Israel

When One Parent Leaves a Hasidic Community, What Happens to the Kids?

Posted By on May 22, 2023

Not long after, Chavie decided she was done. She knew that husbands were often reluctant to give their wives a geta religious divorceso when Naftali agreed to give her one and they went to the beis din, the rabbinical court, she readily signed whatever papers she was given. She didnt pay much attention to a clause requiring her to raise the children Hasidic. In March, 2009, they were officially divorced. Later that month, Naftali married again. After he remarried, he told Chavie that he needed to focus on his new wife, and he stopped seeing their children regularly. Sometimes he took them out for pizza, but he didnt have them over to his new house. He didnt pay child support. Soon he and his wife began having babies of their own.

It was at this point that Chavie allowed herself to think, If I am raising these children alone, how do I want to do it? And what do I actually want in my life? She consulted a Modern Orthodox rabbi, hoping he would tell her that she could be both gay and religious, but he said that if she was really a lesbian she had to be celibate. And so her choice slowly became clear to her: she could be celibate; she could live a secret life and lie to everyone; or she could leave the community. This last possibility was so extreme that it took several years to form in her mind.

Outwardly, she was still a good girl. She worked at a community magazine, she was involved with the PTA. But she must have had some kind of air about her, because people started confiding their own weird stuff. This one wished she could wear shorter skirts; that one wanted to go to the movies. Some women were meeting strangers they had found on Craigslist. One day, she heard her co-workers gossiping about a woman named Chani Getter. Chani was a little older, but Chavie knew who she wasshe had grown up on the next block. Someone said, Did you hear? Chani is a lesbian now, and shes running crazy wild retreats for lesbians, and she takes her kids there. The co-workers were horrified, but Chavie went home, Googled Chani Getter, and called her.

Marie was an Army bratshe grew up half in Germany, half in the U.S. (Marie is a pseudonym.) Her father was a Christian, an American soldier; her mother came from a Haredi German family. Neither was religious, and they celebrated holidays in an irregular fashiona bit of Hanukkah, a bit of Christmas. When Marie was a child, her mother told her stories about growing up Haredi, and the one that stuck in her head was about how if she used the wrong fork and made it un-kosher she had to go outside and thrust it into the ground, and sometimes it was so cold and the ground so hard that it was difficult. At the time, Marie thought this sounded crazysomething that only bizarre, mean parents would force their children to doand certainly her mother was very bitter about her religious upbringing. But, as Marie grew older, her mothers stories piqued her interest. She was looking for a way of life that was more spiritual and structured than the way shed grown up, and, after moving every three years from place to place and country to country, she wanted a community to belong to. By the time her parents settled in Killeen, Texas, near Fort Hood, when she was in high school, she had found herself wanting to become Orthodox.

She couldnt force her family to keep kosher, so she ate vegetarian. She babysat and mowed lawns in order to earn money to buy an extra set of dishes, so they wouldnt be tainted by her familys non-kosher food. She stopped wearing pants. Her mother was appalled; she said that Marie was spitting on her familys way of life. Eventually, this caused so much strain that Marie went to live with a religious friend she knew from her synagogue. After graduating from high school, she went to Baylor to study premed.

While she was in college, Marie met a rabbi from Monsey. He told her that in Monsey there were men who were a little older than she but still unmarried because for some reason they werent considered a catch. If she wanted to marry a Haredi man, he said, she should look for a man like that, because with her dubious religious background she wasnt a catch, either. It took her a while to get used to the idea of marrying a man she didnt know, but she believed that she should trust God without questioning, so she did. She met a twenty-seven-year-old man in a religious chat room, and left college to marry him in the fall of 2001.

When Marie first arrived in Monsey, it felt wonderful to her to be in a place where nobody thought she was strange for being religious. There were kosher stores everywhere, lots of people were modestly dressed. People in the community spoke Yiddish, but Marie understood them because she spoke German. Early on, a woman walking near her on the street grabbed her shirt and yanked her over to let a man pass by, so that he wouldnt have to walk behind or between them, and that startled her, but she told herself that she was new to this, and there were bound to be customs she didnt know about.

The marriage, though, was difficult from the start. She wanted to go back to collegeshe still hoped to become a doctorbut she was scolded for trying to overthrow her husband. (Maries husband, too, declined to be interviewed.) She saw that as a bride she had not received the same kinds of gifts as other daughters-in-law; her husband told her that she should be grateful that his family took her in after the way she had been raised, like an animal in a zoo.

When she and her husband had their first child, a daughter, she became absorbed in being a mother and felt happier. A couple of years later, they had a son. But the marriage grew worse. Her husband controlled the household money, and told her that in order for him to give her some, even to buy basic items such as sanitary napkins, she had to deserve it. He called her names, and when their daughter was around six or seven he started calling her names, toougly, fat, stupid. Finally, in 2012, they went to the beis din to get a divorce. She got custody of the children; he was to see them for dinner a couple of times a week and every other Shabbos.

After her husband moved out, Marie began seeking out family and old friends. Before she had kids, she had been estranged from her parents, but now they travelled from Texas to visit her. Her family knew that she hadnt had a minute to herself during the more than ten years that she was married, so they gathered together some money and told her to take a vacation. One of the friends Marie reconnected with was an Indian-Jewish woman whom shed met in college and who had moved back home afterward, and this friend invited her to visit. Marie arranged for the kids to stay with a family in Monsey for two weeks and bought a ticket to India.

Issac was born in Borough Park, Brooklyn, the ninth of ten children, in what would become the Bobov-45 group. (Issac is not the name he usually goes by.) His father was exceptionally devout and rigid about rule-keeping, but Issac was always getting into trouble. When a teacher hit him, he called the Fire Department. When one of the school principals made him angry, he squirted ketchup and mustard all over all the principals lunches. He was bullied by the other kids. When he prayed, he tried to feel a connection to God, but it never worked. Mostly, praying meant nothing to him. His father was always telling him stories about people burning in Hell, and those would frighten him for a while, but then it wore off. He didnt doubt the existence of God, exactly; he didnt have a strong belief one way or the other.

He was sent to sleepaway camp for the first time when he was nine or ten. On visiting day his father came to see him, and while the other parents played games, or took their kids out boating, Issacs father took him into the empty shul and said, Lets review what you have studied these past two weeks. The summer that Issac was fifteen, he had a rough week at camp and decided to kill himself. Luckily, he didnt know how to do ithe took forty Benadryl pills and went to bed. The camp nurse gave him water the next day to flush his system, but apart from that no one did much; mental illness tended to be hushed up, because it could affect the marriage prospects of everyone in the family. Issac didnt see a therapist until about six months later, and that was to deal with attention deficit disorder. He was advised to tell nobody about the therapy, not even his brothers and sisters.

When Issac turned eighteen, in 2006, it came time for him to marry, and matchmakers started getting in touch. Normally, a person had only one shidduchone match. Eight of Issacs nine siblings married the first person they met, but Issac met five girls, and five times he was rejected. Part of the problem might have been that he wasnt a yeshiva boy anymorehe worked in an office-supply storeand having a job was less prestigious. One matchmaker told him that shed fibbed on his behalf, saying that he learned with a study partner every night, but it made no difference. He was told that one girl rejected him because he talked too much. By the time a matchmaker suggested a sixth girl, he no longer gave a shit. He agreed to go through with the meeting only to pacify his father. The matchmaker didnt know him or the girl personallypresumably, she had picked a girl for her failings, to go with his.

His father mentioned the girl one day when he got home from work, and Issac drove up to Monsey to meet her. He was done trying to make himself look goodhe thought, Lets just get through this and go home. But he liked her. She was devout, but not stiff or judgmental. She was very attractive. She had had a difficult childhood and wasnt living with her family. They talked for about an hour, and, fifteen minutes after Issac left, the matchmaker called both of them and told each that the other wanted to meet again, although in fact neither had said anything about it. They met the following afternoon, and then a third time. At this point, Issac had begun to think that something might actually come of it, so they talked seriously for four or five hours. He asked the girl, Faigy (a pseudonym), if she had any questions for him, and she fetched a list shed drawn up. Faigy told him about her childhood, and he asked her if she was in therapy. She admitted that she was. Issac told her, If you werent, there is no way I would consider this. She said, I want to marry you.

After her divorce, Marie felt hemmed in by scrutiny and gossip. She believed that her ex-husband was trying to find dirt on her, in order to get the kids back. He told people in the community that she didnt keep kosher, that she didnt keep Shabbos. People rammed their shopping carts into hers at Rockland Kosher. Her employers, who had heard that she was no longer Jewish, fired her.Photograph by Dawit N.M. for The New Yorker

The first year of their marriage was easy. His wife was the opposite of his parents, he thoughtshe never told him what to do. He felt that life with his parents had been a constant struggle, and now the struggle was over. Nine and a half months after their wedding, he and Faigy had a daughter. But being happily married to a religious woman didnt change Issacs feelings about religion, and, left to his own devices, his observance started to slip. He still did the basics, showing his face in shul when he had to, but he wasnt praying every day.

See original here:

When One Parent Leaves a Hasidic Community, What Happens to the Kids?

Occupied City Review: Steve McQueens Cannes Documentary On Nazi Occupation Of Amsterdam Takes Its Place Among Great WWII-Themed Films – Deadline

Posted By on May 22, 2023

Occupied City Review: Steve McQueens Cannes Documentary On Nazi Occupation Of Amsterdam Takes Its Place Among Great WWII-Themed Films  Deadline

Continued here:

Occupied City Review: Steve McQueens Cannes Documentary On Nazi Occupation Of Amsterdam Takes Its Place Among Great WWII-Themed Films - Deadline


Page 137«..1020..136137138139..150160..»

matomo tracker