Page 1,428«..1020..1,4271,4281,4291,430..1,4401,450..»

US Jewish leaders back metal detectors on Temple Mount – Heritage Florida Jewish News

Posted By on July 28, 2017

There is a broad consensus among American Jewish leaders in support of Israel's use of metal detectors to intercept terrorists on Jerusalem's Temple Mount.

The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations "supports taking the necessary and appropriate steps to assure security for all and to protect the sanctity of these holy sites," the umbrella group's executive vice chairman and CEO, Malcolm Hoenlein, told JNS.org.

Herbert Block, executive director of the American Zionist Movement, said, "If the authorities responsible for security feel certain measures are necessary to meet their responsibility to protect those who visit for prayer or as respectful visitors, it is no different than security considerations at the Vatican, at the [U.S.] Capitol or any other significant location where public access is permitted under applicable law."

"In a world where security measures are being enhanced in major gathering places, it's only surprising that the Temple Mount didn't have such measures until now," American Jewish Committee CEO David Harris told JNS.org. "The terror attack last week, in which two Israelis were killed, is a tragic reminder of why metal detectors are needed for the safety of all visitors and personnel."

The World Jewish Congress (WJC) and B'nai B'rith International are taking similar positions.

"It is not the presence of metal detectors that leads to violence, rather the unrelenting incitement to violence on the part of the Palestinian Authority that does not cease," said Betty Ehrenberg, the WJC's executive director for North America. "In the interest of protecting the safety and security of all visitors to the Temple Mount and in keeping the peace at the holy site, the metal detectors need to remain in place, as they are at the Western Wall and in many sensitive and holy places around the world, including Mecca and the Vatican."

B'nai B'rith International said in a statement provided to JNS.org that the Israeli government "cannot look the other way in the face of acts of violence, especially in light of the killings of its police officers. Metal detectors are one way, used globally, to keep the public safe. There may be other methods, as well, but doing nothing is not an option."

The United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism has not taken a position on the issue, but several prominent Conservative rabbis are speaking out in favor of the metal detectors.

Writing from Israel, Rabbi Neil Cooper of Temple Beth Hillel-Beth El, near Philadelphia, pointed out that not only do many Israeli malls and restaurants have metal detectors, but in addition, "When one enters the Western Wall Plaza, one is required to pass through metal detectors. It is expected, anticipated and reasonable." Cooper said he was surprised to learn that metal detectors have not been used on the Temple Mount until now.

"It should be welcomed by everyone who abhors violence and will impede those desiring to harm others," he said.

Rabbi Joel Meyers, executive vice president emeritus of Conservative Judaism's Rabbinical Assembly, noted, "Most of us in the United States go through metal detectors daily in order to enter public buildings and most Israelis go through metal detectors to even enter a shopping mall, so if needed to help security on the Temple Mount, there should be no discussion."

Among dovish groups, Dr. Michael Koplow, policy director of the Israel Policy Forum (IPF), told JNS.org, "IPF's position is that metal detectors at the entrances to the Temple Mount are a commonsense and relatively unobtrusive way to protect the safety of both Jews and Muslims on the Temple Mount and its environs, and that erecting them does not alter the site's status quo."

Americans for Peace Now agreed that "security measures are obviously necessary at this spot," although the organization added that it "reserves judgment on the specifics of the security tools utilized in Jerusalem's Holy Basin."

Read the rest here:
US Jewish leaders back metal detectors on Temple Mount - Heritage Florida Jewish News

Arson suspects sought after 9 fires in Callingwood – Edmonton Sun – Edmonton Sun

Posted By on July 28, 2017


Edmonton Sun
Arson suspects sought after 9 fires in Callingwood - Edmonton Sun
Edmonton Sun
Talmud Torah fire Edmonton police are investigating after fire damaged a recycling bin outside of Talmud Torah School on Saturday in Edmonton, as seen on ...

and more »

Link:

Arson suspects sought after 9 fires in Callingwood - Edmonton Sun - Edmonton Sun

A Feud For The Ages: A History Of The Jews And The Church (Part III: Conflict and Crusade) – The Jewish Press – JewishPress.com

Posted By on July 28, 2017

Photo Credit: Wikipedia

Whereas Christianity began as a tiny sect in the predominately pagan Roman Empire, during the Middle Ages it was the dominant religion in Europe. And while its common to describe this period as one of unrelenting persecution and misery for Europes Jews, some historians argue for a more balanced approach.

We live in an age of sound bites and the 140-character tweet. In this world, the Jewish experience during the Middle Ages, when the Catholic Church was at the peak of its power, is usually summed up in six words: It was bad for the Jews. The truth, of course, is more complicated.

Norman Roth, for example, professor emeritus of Hebrew and Semitic Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, has argued that its incorrect to speak of the Church as persecuting or discriminating against the Jews. The Church, he says, was never a monolithic entity, with the pope giving orders that were followed to the letter down the line, all the way to the local priest living in some faraway corner of Europe. Archbishops and bishops had jurisdiction on the local level, and the degree of tolerance or persecution and there were periods of both depended upon who filled those roles at any given time, irrespective of papal directives from Rome.

Others point out that during the Middle Ages the Jews were under the jurisdiction of the secular rulers, who were responsible for their protection. While the clergy may have egged them on, it was the kings and princes who expelled the Jews from their lands, usually for economic and social reasons.

Yet the majority of historians even those who argue for a more nuanced approach agree that the thirteenth century was a turning point in Jewish-Church relations, a time when Church acceptance of the presence of Jews in a predominately Christian society was replaced with a much less tolerant policy. In the words of Hebrew University historian Benzion Dinur, from then on the state and the Church would consider the Jews as people of no religion (benei bli dat) who have no place in the Christian world.

What happened?

From Augustine to the Crusades

Augustine of Hippo, the fifth-century Christian theologian, had a profound influence on official Church policy regarding the Jews. He rejected those who argued the Jews should be killed or forcibly converted, saying the Jews served a purpose in Gods plan for the world: Their adherence to the Torah proved the authenticity of the Old Testament, which in the Churchs opinion contained prophecies that foretold the coming of Christianity. Therefore, Jews should be allowed to live in Christian societies and practice Judaism without interference.

This became the official policy of the popes, who ruled from Rome. But it didnt mean that Jews should be welcomed with open arms and allowed to participate in Christian society freely. Church councils which could be binding upon all Christians or affect only those living in a particular country, province or diocese forbade intermarriage between Christians and Jews or even sharing a meal in order to keep the two communities separate. The third Toledo Synod, held in 582, also prohibited Jews from holding any public office that would enable them to punish Christians; Jews were prohibited from owning slaves as well. The Quinisext Synod of Constantinople, held in 692, and several later synods forbade Christians from receiving treatment from Jewish physicians, although even popes would often ignore this ruling and employ Jews as court physicians. The Fourth Lateran Council (1215) included a regulation that Jews must wear a special dress to distinguish them from Christians, which often took the form of a yellow badge.

But while there were archbishops and bishops who railed against the Jews and sought to curtail their social and economic activities, there were others who acted as advocates and protectors. For instance, Rudiger Huzmann, bishop of Speyer, famously invited Jews to settle in his city in 1084 to help enhance its image a thousandfold. In the charter outlining the Jews rights, he granted them the right to buy and sell what they please, own land, and maintain their own beis din, among other privileges.

During the First Crusade, which was launched by Pope Urban II in 1095 to drive out the Muslims from Jerusalem and the rest of the Holy Land, the Jews of Speyer were attacked by the army assembled by German Count Emicho of Leiningen. Speyers burghers and peasants from the countryside also joined the attack. But according to Mainz Anonymous, a contemporaneous account written by an unknown Jewish author, the bishop at that time, Johann von Kraichgau I, came with many troops and wholeheartedly stood by the community, he took them into his private quarters and saved them from their hands. Of course, the Jews had to pay for the privilege of being housed in the bishops palace until the pogrom subsided, but at least their lives had been saved and they were grateful.

Emicho was also responsible for the pogrom in nearby Mainz. Here too the citys leading clergyman, Archbishop Ruthard, gave the Jews shelter in his quarters. But Emichos troops attacked the palace and murdered the majority of Mainzs Jews, some 700 souls. Another 200 killed themselves and their families rather than submit to the horde. In Worms, Bishop Adalbert tried to protect his citys Jews from the marauders, but without success. The local populace, which had accused Wormss Jews of poisoning their wells, joined forces with Emichos army; the citys entire kehillah, some 800 souls, was slaughtered. In Cologne, the scene of another brutal attack, Archbishop Hermann III sent many Jews to the countryside, where they were successfully hidden by Christian peasants.

Many Jews were also forcibly converted by the crusading mob, even though this was against official Church policy. But in at least one place, Regensburg, the kehillah was allowed to return to practicing Judaism by Holy Roman Emperor Henry IV.

The Talmud on Trial

There is no question that life was precarious for Europes Jews throughout the Middle Ages. But in the early years, at least, the Jews were welcomed by many Church and secular leaders thanks to their economic prowess. This changed in the thirteenth century, when economic activity began to slow. During the 1300s a century marked by famine, plague, and social unrest European growth and prosperity ground to a halt. As the economic importance of the Jews declined, so too did their protected status. But while the secular monarchs had no problem expelling the Jews when they needed to either to refill an empty treasury with confiscated Jewish wealth or to appease discontented burghers and peasants Church figures still had to contend with Augustine.

Augustines viewpoint was seriously challenged in 1240, when a Jewish apostate named Nicholas Donin put the Talmud on trial in Paris. Donin, who had joined the Franciscan Order, translated the Talmud into Latin with the express purpose of condemning it and the Jews. Donin first went to Rome, where he convinced Pope Gregory IX that the Talmud included attacks on Jesus and his mother, Mary, and encouraged hostile relations between Jews and Christians.

Before this, the pope and other high-ranking clergy had ignored the Talmud, which was, literally, a closed book to most of them. But now an incensed Gregory sent transcripts of Donins accusations to Church authorities, along with an order to seize all copies of the Talmud and deposit them with the Dominicans and Franciscans, who were to examine the volumes. If it was found that Donins charges were correct, the volumes were to be burned.

This papal order was ignored, except in France, where King Louis IX ordered Frances Jews to surrender their Talmuds, on pain of death. On June 12, 1240, a disputation between Donin and four French rabbis began. While one outcome of the debate is well known the subsequent burning of the Talmud and other Jewish books on June 17, 1244 the Disputation of Paris had yet another devastating effect upon European Jewry. Before the disputation, the pope and most other clergymen assumed the Jews relied exclusively on the Written Torah what they called the Old Testament for religious instruction and inspiration. The knowledge that the Jews regarded the Oral Torah just as highly came as a shock.

After the initial shock wore off, some members of the Church finally had the ammunition they needed to replace the Churchs ambivalent relationship with the Jews with one of outright hostility. By abandoning the Bible for the Talmud, which contained blasphemies against Christianity, they argued, the Jews had changed the rules of the game. Therefore, Augustines argument on their behalf no longer applied. The Jews no longer had a place in the Christian world.

The Rise of Anti-Judaism

In the decades that followed, Jews were expelled from England and France and other places. There would be several more disputations, including the famous one that took place between Ramban and the apostate Dominican Friar Pablo Christiani in Barcelona in 1263. While there had been blood libels and accusations of well poisonings before the Disputation of Paris, the accusations multiplied during this period. And the consequences could be grave. For instance, after the Jews of Troyes, France were accused of a blood libel in 1288, they were burned at the stake the first mass burning of Jews in Europe.

The official stance of most of the popes was that Jews didnt use Christian blood to bake matzot or poison wells. During the Black Death, Clement IV issued a papal bull stating, contrary to public opinion, that the plague wasnt a Jewish plot. But according to Jeremy Cohen, author of The Friars and the Jews: The Evolution of Medieval Anti-Judaism, mendicant orders such as the Dominicans and Franciscans also had a voice in determining Church policy, and that voice was virulently against Judaism, which the friars equated with a pernicious heresy. In Cohens words:

As inquisitors, missionaries, disputants, polemicists, scholars, and itinerant preachers, mendicants engaged in a concerted effort to undermine the religious freedom and physical security of the medieval Jewish community. It was they who developed and manned the papal Inquisition, who intervened in the Maimonidean controversy, who directed the burnings of the Talmud, who compelled the Jews to listen and respond to their inflammatory sermons, and who actively promoted anti-Jewish hatred among the laity of Western Christendom.

The Jews were now seen not just as spiritual outsiders but also as a real and present physical danger, and the friars were increasingly fanning the flames with their fiery sermons. In Spain, the century ended with a series of pogroms that led to the forced conversion of tens of thousands of Jews and the slaughter of many more. Yet the rabble-rousing friars and local clergymen werent content even with that. Convinced that many of the new converts were practicing Judaism in secret, they convinced the Spanish monarchs Ferdinand and Isabella to establish an Inquisition in newly-unified Spain.

The Spanish Inquisition opened for business in 1483, under the leadership of the Dominican friar Tomas de Torquemada. Just a few decades later the Church itself came under attack when Martin Luther began his Reformation. In Part IV well take a look at how the Jews fared during this era of Inquisition and insurgency.

______________________________

Sources:

Bishops and Jews in the Middle Ages, Norman Roth, The Catholic Historical Review, Vol. 80, No. 1 (Jan. 1994).

Christian Persecution of Jews over the Centuries, Gerard S. Sloyan, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, http://www.ushmm.org.

Church, State, and Jew in the Middle Ages, Robert Chazan, Behrman House, 1979.

The First Crusade, Rabbi Berl Wein, JewishHistory.org.

The Friars and the Jews: the Evolution of Medieval Anti-Judaism, Jeremy Cohen, Cornell University Press, 1984.

View original post here:

A Feud For The Ages: A History Of The Jews And The Church (Part III: Conflict and Crusade) - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com

Synagogue Firebombers Sentenced To 35 Years: Report – Patch – Patch.com

Posted By on July 28, 2017


Patch.com
Synagogue Firebombers Sentenced To 35 Years: Report - Patch
Patch.com
Ridgewood-Glen Rock, NJ - Aakash Dalal, 24, masterminded a series of attacks and show Anthony Graziano how to make Molotov cocktails that were used in ...
2 men convicted in synagogue fire bombings get prisonNew Jersey Herald
New Jersey Men Sentenced For Firebombing Synagogues And Rabbi's HomeForward
Synagogue bombers get 35 yearsThe Jewish Standard
NJ.com
all 8 news articles »

Continued here:

Synagogue Firebombers Sentenced To 35 Years: Report - Patch - Patch.com

Egypt Plans $2M Restoration Of Centuries-Old Alexandria Synagogue – Forward

Posted By on July 28, 2017

Egypt is planning to shell out $2 million for the renovation of a synagogue in Alexandria that attests to a Jewish presence in the country that has endured for millennia.

We are experiencing a renaissance, Samy Ibrahim, a member of the Cairo Jewish community, told the Religious News Service. The government is elevating the profile of the heritage of Egyptian Jews.

Renovating the Eli Synagogue will be covered by the government. There are only a few dozen Jews left in Egypt, but there used to be tens of thousands, prior to post-war pogroms that sent most fleeing for Israel, the United States and France.

The Jewish presence in Egypt dates historically to antiquity, with Jews in Hellenic times taking up residence in Alexandria, producing intellectuals like the ancient philosopher Philo.

Constructed in Italianate style, the Eli Synagogue was built in 1860, on the site of a former Jewish house of worship. It lies in the area that used to be the center of the citys vibrant Jewish life.

_Contact Daniel J. Solomon at solomon@forward.com or on Twitter [@DanielJSolomon](www.

See the article here:

Egypt Plans $2M Restoration Of Centuries-Old Alexandria Synagogue - Forward

Scene Around – Heritage Florida Jewish News

Posted By on July 28, 2017

Linda Mogul

The surge...

I recently heard from the Jewish Telegraphic Agency about the surge in anti-Semitism.

The subject was addressed in an article written by DANIEL ELBAUM and MARC D. STERN. I pass it along (in part) to you:

"Almost daily accounts of vandalized cemeteries, spray-painted swastikas and bomb threats to JCCs and other Jewish agencies have naturally evoked considerable alarm.

Clearly, we must never reconcile ourselves to an America where this is considered normal. Yet we must not succumb to the opposite tendency to see these recent incidents through a 2,000-year-old lens and draw comparisons to darker days, when Jews felt powerless and alone in the fight against anti-Semitism.

There is no nation (other than Israel, of course) that has been more hospitable and welcoming to Jews than the United States. Indeed, there has been no generation of Jews in our people's history more ingrained into the fabric of the nation in which it lived.

A recent Pew Research Center report found that Jews are (among) the most admired religious groups in the country, and it will take far more than the incidents of the last few months to alter that fact."

(There are things that can be done. Perhaps the White House should convene a conference on violent extremism and hate crimes. I got that idea from the JTA letter as well.)

My hometown ... Brooklyn, USA ...

About a month or two ago, I received a pamphlet in the mail titled "Another Time, Another Place: A neighborhood remembered." It was written by GERALD CHATANOW and BERNARD SCHWARTZ. ( I personally knew an actor named Bernard Schwartz who went by the professional name Tony Curtis, but this was not the same man!) The pamphlet said:

"The Brownsville/East New York neighborhood of the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s is now but an almost faded memory, a 'time warp' as it were. Today it is a neighborhood that has been eviscerated and exists only as a geographic locale. Through the collective memories of the famous and the not so famous, the writers have elicited and chronicled a treasure trove of anecdotes and remembrances that bring back to life a once vibrant and exhilarating neighborhood. It is available at Xlibris. Phone 1-888-795-4274."

(I have memories of my beloved Brooklyn neighborhood too. I used to sit on the corner milk box outside of the corner candy store with friends; the school yard at P.S.233; Tilden H.S.; snacks like polly seeds, Hooten Chocolate bars, egg creams, frappes, etc. and most of all, I have memories of my youth!)

Speaking of memories...

After moving down to Central Florida about 53 years ago (I was in diapers and if you believe that I have a bridge to sell you) I remember making friends with some very special people who I still bump into here and there. One of the most special is LINDA MOGUL, a wonderful gal I have always loved even though we don't see much of each other, except, as I said, I bump into here and there.

I first met Linda when she was a toddler. The daughter of my friends, RUTH and MAX MOGUL, I recall sitting in their home and along came this adorable little girl trying to walk in her daddy's shoes!

She was (and still is) the sweetest, most loving girl in the world as far as I'm concerned.

I had the pleasure of bumping into her again just a few days ago at the Bagel King restaurant on Semoran Blvd.

(I always get a feeling of joy when I see Linda!)

Shout-out...

Speaking of Bagel King, they have a waitress there who is just the best! Her name is COLLEEN BELEIN. She is a pretty gal with a great sense of humor and terrific skills at her job! I was depressed when I sat down but laughing and in great spirits when I got up!

Thanks, Colleen.

The JCC 39er's Cinema Sundays...

On Sunday, July 30th at 2 p.m. in the Senior Lounge, a very funny movie will be featured. "The Boss" starring MELISSA McCARTHY is on the bill. (Feel like laughing? I guarantee you will!)

JCC 39er's "Meet & Mingle Mondays...

Melissa McCarthy

The next meeting of the JCC 39er's will be very special, indeed! It takes place on Monday, July 31st, in the Senior Lounge at 12:30 p.m. Both lunch and entertainment will be provided by Savannah Court.

(I repeat... this is very special indeed!)

One for the road...

One morning, as Moshe gets off the bus to go to work, he can't help but notice that the woman who got off the bus in front of him has her right breast hanging outside her blouse. He is always one to help people and so is not embarrassed to go over to her and say, "Excuse me madam, but did you know that your right breast is showing?"

The lady takes one look down at her breast, then shrieks on top of her voice, "Oy vay, I've left my baby on the bus."

Link:

Scene Around - Heritage Florida Jewish News

In trip to Lodz, Poland, East Bay group sees dark past, hopeful future – Jweekly.com

Posted By on July 28, 2017

Part Two of a three-part series J. Senior Editor Sue Barnett traveled to Poland in June with the Jewish Federation of the East Bay and the S.F. Federations Young Adult Division. She documents the experience in a series of reports this week and next. Lodz, Poland From the time he was a boy growing up on a chicken farm in Connecticut, Piedmont resident Moses Libitzky knew that his parents were from Lodz, had survived the Holocaust and had suffered unthinkable losses. But as in many survivor families, nobody really talked about it.

The parents didnt want to burden their three children, and the children didnt want to ask questions that would pain their parents. The second generation was spared the traumatic details but still carried the weight of their sorrow.

I heard some of it, you could hear them having conversations with their friends in Yiddish, but they didnt talk to the kids at all, said Libitzky, 70, a philanthropist and real estate investor. You cant understand the story in little bits and pieces, and I never really put it together.

Only when his parents started to open up could he and his two sisters begin to comprehend the whole story. But it took 40 years after the war before Eva and Martin Libitzky were able to recount the most devastating time of their lives, and their son was in his 30s before he was ready to embrace the family history as his own.

Now the whole world is getting to know the story, too.

Out on a Ledge is Eva Libitzkys deeply moving memoir, first published in the U.S. in 2010; the Polish edition came out last month. A book-release event was held June 28 in Krakow, Poland, where a popular Jewish Culture Festival is held each summer.

Eva was only 16 when her world collapsed. For nearly six years she endured the Lodz Ghetto, Auschwitz and a slave-labor camp, relying on her wits, courage and sheer will to live. She was the only survivor in her entire family.

The memoir, co-written with Bay Area historian Fred Rosenbaum, opens with Evas idyllic childhood in Lodz within a close-knit Hasidic community. It also describes the trying times after the war when the family started over in America, including more than 10 grueling years in the chicken farming business.

Eva didnt want to do the book. She had to dredge up memories that were far too painful. She cried every night. She wanted to stop. But her son Moses said no, keep going. Your story, our story, has to be told.

His insistence has driven the family forward for decades, ever since his parents did their first full interview with psychiatrist and survivor Dr. Dori Laub at the Yale University Library in 1982. As draining as the experience was, it released something in Eva, showing her to be a compelling storyteller with remarkable recall for details.

The next year, when the couple decided to attend the American Gathering of Jewish Holocaust Survivors and Descendants in Washington, D.C., Moses and his sisters, Anne and Ellie, said they wanted to go, too.

Thats when the family conversations really started, he recalled in a recent interview. There was a greater willingness by them to talk about it and us to ask questions about it.

Soon after, he said, I decided I wanted to go back and see my roots, to where my parents are from, to put flesh on the bones, to connect these stories.

His first trip to Poland, with his parents and one of his sisters, was in 1990. Hes been going back ever since.

The most recent visit was in June when he headed a group from the Jewish Federation of the East Bay. Participants on the trip, subsidized by the Taube Foundation for Jewish Life & Culture, included several people with survivors in their family and one, Riva Berelson, whose father also survived the Lodz Ghetto (see related story, A Lodz familys musical legacy).

Together the group went to see the apartment building where Eva spent her happy first 16 years, where her father ran a grocery store and her mother created a beautiful Jewish home. The next tour stop was the site of the most impenetrable ghetto in Europe, where Eva and Martin lived in wretched, desperate conditions with their relatives, many of whom did not make it out alive. More than 200,000 Jews were packed into the ghetto, which became a manufacturing hub for German industry. No more than 15,000 survived.

Abutting the ghetto boundaries is the Jewish cemetery, Polands largest, today overgrown and its tombstones in disrepair. Several of Eva and Martins family members are buried among the 180,000 dead. The East Bay group said Kaddish at the graves of Evas grandfather Abraham Katz, father Shlomo Gerszt and uncle Yankel Katz.

At the June release party for the Polish edition of her memoir, Eva, 93, appeared via Skype from her home in Florida, her image projected on a screen inside a hall packed with admirers.

The connection wasnt working very well. Mom, can you hear me? Moses kept asking as she kept leaning in closer to the computer, smiling the whole time. Hit your mute button, youre breaking up! The back-and-forth exchange between mother and son was a charming interlude in a day otherwise filled with sober reflection.

Knowing the stories and seeing where they happened have helped Moses Libitzky connect deeply to his history. He has helped others do the same, leading several trips in recent years to Lodz and other Jewish heritage sites in Poland where Bay Area residents have roots.

Moses and his wife, Susan, also support related cultural initiatives, such as the Field Guide to Jewish Lodz, just published by the Taube Center for the Renewal of Jewish Life in Poland. It features four walking tours and outlines the history of this once-bustling industrial city. While only a few hundred Jews remain, they run a community center, synagogue, mikvah and kindergarten.

Moses Libitzkys experiences in Poland have been so rewarding, he said, that in 2013 he arranged a family trip for 17 relatives, including his mother (his father, Martin, died in 2012). It was time to pass the legacy forward to the next generation and for Eva, then 89, to see the renaissance of Jewish life in Poland, from Warsaw to Krakow to Lodz, that has taken place since her first trip more than 20 years earlier.

We persevered, Eva reflects in her memoir. Hitler, you did not succeed. You left only a tiny remnant, an ember, but we raised families, and our children raised families. As the famous hymn of resistance written in the Vilna Ghetto puts it, We are here.

Go here to read the rest:

In trip to Lodz, Poland, East Bay group sees dark past, hopeful future - Jweekly.com

Der Spiegel removes ‘antisemitic’ book from bestseller list – The Guardian

Posted By on July 28, 2017

We felt a responsibility copies of Der Spiegel on sale with other German newspapers. Photograph: Steven May/Alamy

The influential German news magazine Der Spiegel has deleted from its bestseller list a book that one of its own editors had pushed up the rankings, after it was found to be antisemitic and historically revisionist.

Finis Germania, or The End of Germany, collects the thoughts of the late historian Rolf Peter Sieferle on the position of Germany, including how it deals with the Holocaust. The book is currently at the top of Amazon.des bestseller chart and this month it entered Der Spiegels bestseller list, which many bookshops use as a basis for promotional displays, in sixth place.

Finis Germania is missing from the list in this weeks issue of the magazine. Many bookshops have followed suit and are not displaying the title.

Susanne Beyer, Der Spiegels deputy editor, said Finis Germania had been omitted because the magazine considered the book posthumously published by a small house, Antaios, known for its far-right leanings to be rightwing extremist, antisemitic and historically revisionist.

Since Der Spiegel understood itself as a medium of enlightenment even on historical subjects, Beyer continued, the magazine had decided not to help advance the sales of such a book.

Beyer admitted that, in June, Finis Germania had made it on to a prestigious list of nonfiction books of the month, after her colleague Johannes Saltzwedel recommended the title.

Saltzwedel, one of the jury members for the non-sales-based recommendations list published by the broadcaster NDR and the Sddeutsche Zeitung newspaper, had used all of his available 20 votes to nominate Sieferles collection of short essays. Usually, jury members divide their votes among several books.

Saltzwedel, who has since resigned from the jury, said he had consciously tried to bring a very provocative book of historical and contemporary interpretation into the debate.

Jo Glanville, director of the freedom of speech group English PEN, criticised Der Spiegels decision. This is an embarrassing move for Der Spiegel. The publication of the ranking of bestselling titles is surely a statement of fact, she said. This omission risks undermining the magazines authority and reputation. Censorship can never be a successful tool for tackling the far right.

Der Spiegels editor, Klaus Brinkbumer, said: Our decision was welcomed by a lot of readers and criticised by some (and criticised by a few other media and digital newsletters).

I understand the criticism because a bestseller lists goal has to be to be objective and data-based, of course. In this very singular case, and with the cases history, the Spiegel ranking would have been regarded as a second recommendation. It is an antisemitic book, so we felt a responsibility.

Critics have likened Finis Germania to the writings of deeply reactionary German cultural declinists of the early 20th century, such as Oswald Spengler or Ernst Jnger.

The political scientist Herfried Mnkler said the book was deeply impregnated with antisemitic ideas, while Die Zeit called it singularly obnoxious.

Others, including the philosopher Rdiger Safranski, have defended Sieferles book as a work in the night thoughts genre pursued by poets such as Edward Young or Heinrich Heine, describing it as very pessimistic, very melancholy, but also brilliantly phrased.

Sieferle, who published historical works with many of Germanys most respected publishing houses and advised the government on environmental policy, took his own life in September 2016. Finis Germania paints a doom-laden picture of his homelands future.

The author brackets Germany in a group of tragic peoples that also includes the Russians and the Jews ethnic groups that, as he writes, are more sharply marked by the paradoxes of historical processes than the Anglo-Saxons, who are resistant to history like a well-greased boot to water.

In the first half of the 104-page booklet, Sieferle rejects the Sonderweg theory of German history which argues that Germany found a path from aristocracy to democracy unlike any other in world history as entente propaganda.

In the second half, Finis Germania takes a more cynical turn. Sieferle in effect accuses the Jewish people of offloading their own historical guilt on to the German people after the Holocaust. He writes: The Jews guilt for the crucifixion of the messiah was never recognised by them. The Germans, who recognise their merciless guilt, have to disappear from the surface of real history.

Sieferle goes on to describe Auschwitz as the last myth in a thoroughly rationalised world. This is a highly controversial passage in a country in which Holocaust denial remains punishable by law, even if the book then goes on to define a myth as a truth beyond discussion rather than an untruth.

The historian Gustav Seibt, a book critic for Sddeutsche Zeitung, told German radio: I can find little else [in the book] other than the age-old antisemitic topos of Jewish vengefulness and mercilessness. And thats not a new idea it is not a meaningful provocation, but a denigration in a very old and sinister manner.

On its website, Antaios said the scandal surrounding the book has shown that none of the claqueurs has ever read the book at all.

This article was amended on 28 July 2017. An earlier version said that the Sonderweg theory of German history argued that Germany found a path from aristocracy to democracy like any other in world history. This has been corrected to say unlike any other in world history.

Read more:

Der Spiegel removes 'antisemitic' book from bestseller list - The Guardian

Analysis: Bibi’s big bungle – The Jerusalem Post

Posted By on July 28, 2017

Benjamin Netanyahu. (photo credit:MARC ISRAEL SELLEM)

There is an odd Hebrew phrase that multiple Knesset members used to describe Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahus bad week: He ate smelly fish, got lashings, and still got expelled from the city.

Popularized by a midrash called the Mechilta of Rabbi Ishmael, the phrase, based on the Egyptians experience during the Exodus, refers to a man who failed, tried to avoid the punishment he deserved, and ended up with not only that punishment but also paying additional penalties.

That certainly fits Netanyahu, who tried to stand up for Israels sovereignty on the Temple Mount following the murder of two Israeli policemen, at first withstood pressure to remove metal detectors he decided to install at the entrances to the holy site, but ended up removing not only the metal detectors but also security cameras and barriers.

Netanyahu looked especially bad, because even the most moderate Likud minister, Tzachi Hanegbi, talked tough about the metal detectors being there to stay and said if the Muslims had a problem with them, they could pray somewhere else.

When Netanyahu gave in, he not only offended his political base on the Right, he even got slammed in the lead headline in his pet newspaper Israel Hayom. When even your cheerleaders are thumbing their noses at you, you know youve got it especially bad.

When a poll showed the public overwhelmingly opposed giving in on the metal detectors, Netanyahu tried pandering to the Right.

He expressed support for a bill that would widen the borders of Jerusalem, advanced a new community for former residents of the evacuated outpost Amona and announced his opposition to evacuating settlers at a controversial building in Hebron.

That pandering to his political base continued Thursday, when Netanyahu expressed support for giving the death penalty to terrorists, which he knows will never happen. A leak that he supports Defense Minister Avigdor Libermans plan to trade Arab land in pre- 1967 Israel for settlement blocs appeared to be conveniently timed as well.

But it appears Netanyahu will need a lot more to distract the public if the violence on Temple Mount continues and threats of an Arab Day of Rage Friday are carried out. His mantle of Mr. Security will be endangered again if he doesnt calm down the situation.

A Statnet poll broadcast on Channel 10 Thursday night on the one hand gave Netanyahu good news: His Likud Party is predicted to win 28 Knesset seats, compared to 20 for Labor and 17 for Yesh Atid, and he remains by far the candidate seen as most fit to be prime minister.

But on the other hand, there was one result in the poll that was bad news for Netanyahu: When asked who is most fit to be defense minister, the candidate that scored highest was former IDF chief of staff Gabi Ashkenazi.

He beat former defense minister Moshe Yaalon, current defense minister Avigdor Liberman, Education Minister Naftali Bennett, Construction Minister Yoav Gallant, and, as expected, former prime minister and defense minister Ehud Barak was in last place.

The poll indicates that the public wants a new security figure to come and protect them.

Ashkenazi is unlikely to head a party in the next election, but he could provide a massive boost if he became the No. 2 of one the two warring center- left leaders, Avi Gabbay or Yair Lapid.

The best news for Netanyahu is that the Knesset closed for the summer late Wednesday night and its corridors were empty on Thursday. That means that no matter how bad it gets security-wise, he cannot be overthrown until after the fall holidays, even if he would get indicted in a criminal probe.

So even if Netanyahu keeps eating smelly fish and getting lashed, he is not going anywhere any time soon.

Share on facebook

Excerpt from:

Analysis: Bibi's big bungle - The Jerusalem Post

The Forward sees threat from ‘censors,’ but other Jewish editors and groups differ – Heritage Florida Jewish News

Posted By on July 28, 2017

Sam Norich

Is a "mobilized faction" in the American Jewish community attempting to "censor" dovish views? The president of The Forward newspaper thinks so, but other editors and leaders of some left-of-center Jewish organizations see things differently.

The dispute arises from the July 12 episode of the Jewish Broadcasting Service (JBS) television series "L'Chayim," which featured a panel discussion on freedom of speech in the Jewish community.

At the center of the discussion was The Forward's decision to publish a full-page ad in its June 2 edition from Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP), supporting imprisoned Palestinian terrorist Marwan Barghouti.

At the time, The Forward's publisher, Rachel Fishman Feddersen,saidshe decided to run the ad because "mass media itself is on the firing line, and freedom of expression is under pressure from our own government." In the July 12 television segment, however, The Forward's president, Samuel Norich, offered a different explanation. He said freedom of speech is "endangered" because "there is a mobilized faction in the Jewish community that is seeking to censor."

Asked by JNS.org to identify the individuals or organizations to whom he was referring, Norich responded, "I have no further comment."

Editors deny censorship

"I don't feel pressured or censored," Rob Golub, editor of the Wisconsin Jewish Chronicle, told JNS.org. "I don't think any alleged restriction of points of view can even be much of a meaningful problem in the media today. There's all the opinion you could ever want on Twitter. Nobody is sitting around thinking to themselves, 'Darn, I only wish in 2017 I could get access to more opinions.'"

"Is [Norich] suggesting there is a group who have formally joined forces to silence the Jewish press?" asked Judie Jacobson, editor-in-chief of the Connecticut Jewish Ledger. "If so, he needs to 'out' that group. Name them. Shame them... It is incumbent upon him to be more specific."

Hillel Goldberg, executive editor of Colorado's Intermountain Jewish News; Mordecai Specktor, publisher and editor of Minnesota's American Jewish World; and David Ben-Hooren, publisher of New York's The Jewish Voice, all likewise told JNS.org that no factions in the Jewish community have attempted to censor their newspapers.

"This idea that there is some force trying to censor the Jewish media or community is all in the minds of The Forward's editors," Ben-Hooren said. "It's not reality."

Some left-of-center Jewish organizations likewise report no efforts to silence them. Ori Nir, a spokesman for Americans for Peace Now, said there have been no attempts to prevent officials of his organization from publishing articles or speaking in public forums, nor any pressure on newspapers to reject the group's advertisements. He said there have been instances in which editors turned down APN's op-eds because they were deemed "too sensitive" or "too controversial," although many other newspapers have published them.

Controversy over boycotting Israelis

Partners for Progressive Israel, the U.S. affiliate of Israel's left-wing Meretz political party, has encountered some "attempts to silence us," according to Dr. Maya Haber, PPI's director of programming and strategy. She cited the fact that PPI's Detroit chapter has not been allowed to participate in that community's Walk for Israel for the past several years. Organizers of the event said PPI was excluded because it promotes the boycott of Israelis who reside beyond the pre-1967 lines.

Haber also said, "Our views are seldom taken into account even by organizations in which we are represented." But Haber, like The Forward's Norich, declined requests from JNS.org to name the organizations she is accusing.

Granate Sosnoff, communications strategist for JVP, the group at the center of the original controversy over The Forward, told JNS.org there have been no attempts to interfere with her group's activities or publications.

"This does not mean that ongoing attempts to silence us by intimidation and other means do not occur," she said, pointing to anonymous posters that recently appeared in the neighborhood where JVP Executive Director Rebecca Vilkomerson resides. The unsigned posters criticized JVP for working with American Muslims for Palestine, a group the Anti-Defamation League says "has at times provided a platform for anti-Semitism."

Former Union of Reform Judaism President Rabbi Eric Yoffie, who was part of the July 12 JBS panel, said he has received harassing emails in response to some of his articles, but "they come from individuals, not organizations, and they don't bother me."

"Generally speaking, I believe that we are blessed with a lively and open discussion in the American Jewish community, and I don't see much evidence that freedom of speech is endangered in any way," Yoffie said.

Scanned copy of The Forward print edition

The paid advertisement supporting Palestinian terrorist Marwan Barghouti that was published last month in The Forward.

Another participant in the JBS television discussion, Amanda Berman, director of legal affairs at The Lawfare Project, told JNS.org there is "a censorship problem related to Jewish and pro-Israel advocacy, but Sam Norich's position on that problem is entirely inverted." She pointed to recent instances in which pro-Israel speakers and events on college campuses have been disrupted or shut down "by raging mobs chanting genocidal slogans and expletives." Instead of focusing on such activities, The Forward "has now set a precedent [by publishing the Barghouti advertisement] that its pages are a welcome place for terrorists aiming to perpetuate genocidal viewpoints and outright lies," Berman said.

"No one silenced The Forward," said New York University legal scholar Thane Rosenbaum, who also took part in the July 12 JBS panel discussion. "They made this decision without anyone's help. If they were a true Jewish news source, they would have practiced self-censorship, and not given voice and moral support to a killer of Jews."

Visit link:
The Forward sees threat from 'censors,' but other Jewish editors and groups differ - Heritage Florida Jewish News


Page 1,428«..1020..1,4271,4281,4291,430..1,4401,450..»

matomo tracker