Page 1,448«..1020..1,4471,4481,4491,450..1,4601,470..»

Israel: Jewish but not religious? – Intermountain Jewish News

Posted By on July 15, 2017

Rabbi David Lau, Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi of Israel, speaking in Berlin, Germany in 2013. (Sean Gallup/Getty)

Israel is and must continue to be a Jewish state, but does that mean it must be a religious state?

We pose this question because Israels religious bodies, and how they interpret Judaism, is causing some serious rifts in Diaspora relations. Fundamentally, these two communities are at odds: Judaism in Israel is overseen by an institution, the Rabbinate, that is formally associated with Orthodox Judaism. Diaspora Judaism, is pluralistic, encompassing a variety of denominations with no one denomination having much of a say of what happens in another.

How to reconcile these two approaches?

The ideal, it seems, would be if Israel could parallel developments in some European countries that are still very much Christian, but the Christian church has very little to almost no jurisdiction over peoples lives. For example, in England, the Anglican Church is led by the Queen and is the official religion of the state, but the only legal jurisdiction it seems to have is over the marriages and divorces of nobility. There, too, religious holidays are often public holidays, including some you may never have heard of, like Whitsun. And that Anglican Church does receive government support. Could that be a model for Israel? The only issue there and its a big one is that this type of religious secularism (hows that for an oxymoron) took centuries to develop, and Israel is only 69 years old.

Israel was founded on the Zionist dream: A state for Jews. Yet, with the way things are going, Israel is running into the danger of sending the message that its not a state for all Jews, but a theocracy. Thats not a message it can afford tosend.

Read more:

Israel: Jewish but not religious? - Intermountain Jewish News

The remarkable change in India-Israel relations – Heritage Florida Jewish News

Posted By on July 15, 2017

While the anti-Semites continue to spin their wheels trying to convince college student governments to adopt meaningless divestment resolutions and persuade rock stars to boycott Israel, the prime ministers of Israel andIndiaare having a lovefest and the worlds most populous democracy is signing contracts with Israel worth billions of dollars. What must be particularly galling to theBDSadvocates is that India was once a vigorous adherent to the Arab League boycott. The change in Indias posture toward Israel did not happen overnight.

India is one of the few countries whereanti-Semitismhas been non-existent. For decades, however, it was one of the leaders of the nonaligned countries in the United Nations, and pursued a hostile policy toward Israel in part out of fear of alienating the Arab and Muslim countries, as well as its 110 million Muslims citizens.

In 1988, India excluded Israel from the World Table Tennis Championships in New Delhi and, in 1990, three prominent Indian musicians were told not to travel to Israel and canceled plans to perform at the World Music Festival. That same year, four Israeli tennis players were denied visas to participate in a tournament after their entry fees had been accepted.

Indian policy slowly began to change in 1991. One of the first signs of a thaw came in June when seven Israelis and one Dutch tourist were kidnapped by Muslim terrorists in Srinagar, Kashmir. One 22-year-old Israeli was killed. The Indian government worked with Israel to secure the release of other Israelis who eventually escaped.

Still, on Nov. 26, Indias external affairs minister was quoted as saying ambassadors could not be exchanged until genuine progress was reached in Middle East peace talks. By this he meant Israel had withdrawn from the territories and allowed the creation of a Palestinian state. The IndianStatesmannewspaper called it a mindless pronouncement.

That same month, a delegation of the World Jewish Congress met Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao and asked him to upgrade Israels consular office in Bombay to an embassy. That office, established in the 1950s to help Indian Jews emigrate, was Israels only diplomatic post in India. By that time, approximately 35,000 Indian Jews were living in Israel and 6,000 remained in India.

Then, in December, India surprised Israel by voting to repeal the odious UN resolution slandering Zionismas a form of racism. I was the editor of AIPACsNear East Reportat the time and wrote that the next logical move would be for India to normalize relations and open an embassy in Jerusalem. I was subsequently invited to write an article forThe Indian-Americanmagazine on Israel-India ties. At the time, trade with India was approximately $200 million, mostly consisting of polished diamonds. I argued India could benefit from direct trade, cultural and academic exchanges and sharing the lessons of coping with massive influxes of refugees that strain the nations absorptive capacity.

One catalyst for taking the next step was Indias desire to participate in the international Middle East peace conference planned for Moscow on Jan. 28, 1992. China established full diplomatic relations with Israel to win a seat at the table and India did not want to be left out. TheBush administration, which had lobbied India to vote for the repeal of the Zionism resolution at the UN, made it clear that Israel would not agree to their participation if relations were not normalized.

India was also being encouraged to improve ties with Israel by the one-million-strong Indian community in the United States. Narayan Keshavan, the Washington Bureau Chief ofThe Indian-American, noted that influential leaders such as Dr. Mukund Mody of the Overseas Friends of the Bharatiya Janata Party and Kamal Dandona of the Indian National Congress of America, which backs the ruling party in New Delhi, have pushed for better Indo-Israeli relations.

Like many other countries, India also believed that improving ties with Israel would ingratiate the country with thepro-Israel lobbyin the United States, which would then support policies favorable to New Delhi. The policy shift was also related to fears that Pakistan might be the country to benefit if it were to tilt toward Israel. India also hoped to take advantage of the shared interest with Israel in preventing Pakistan from becoming a nuclear power.

Keshavan noted that the Rao government had nothing to lose domestically because his party could not count on the Muslim vote anyway and the opposition supported the establishment of full diplomatic relations with Israel. The Arab states were also in no position to protest after the participation of Syrians, Jordanians, Lebanese, and Palestinians in talks with Israel at theMadrid conferencein 1991.

On Jan. 29, 1992, India announced it would establish full diplomatic relations with Israel. A few months later, the two nations signed an agreement to increase cooperation between Indian and Israeli industries. An agreement was also initialed to allow Air India and El Al to operate flights between the two countries and to promote tourism.

Today, trade is booming. India is Israels ninth leading trade partner. Exports have risen from $200 million in 1992 to $4.2 billion in 2016. In the past decade alone, Israels exports to India have risen a total of about 60 percent. Israeli companies with representative offices or manufacturing plants in India include Teva, Netafim, Check Point, Amdocs, Magic Software, Ness Technologies, Israel Aerospace Industries, Elbit, Verint, Mobileye and HP Indigo.

Military cooperation is especially robust, with Israel selling billions of dollars worth of weapons systems to India. The Indian Navy makes port visits in Haifa and the IDF and Indian military have engaged in joint exercises. In June, for example, pilots from India joined counterparts from Israel, the United States, Germany, France, Italy, and Poland in the largest aerial training exercise ever held in Israel.

Israelis can be found throughout India, as it has become a popular tourist destination, especially for Israelis following their army service. The number of tourists from India has also increased dramatically, with 40,000 Indian nationals vacationing in Israel in 2015.

Following the visit of Prime Minister Modi, Israeli-Indian relations can be expected to grow exponentially in a variety of spheres. Can you think of a more powerful rebuke to the BDS movement than the strengthening of ties between Israel and a country of 1.3 billion people?

Dr. Mitchell Bard is the author/editor of 24 books including the 2017 edition of Myths and Facts: A Guide to the Arab-Israeli Conflict, The Arab Lobby, and the novel After Anatevka: Tevye in Palestine.

Read the original post:
The remarkable change in India-Israel relations - Heritage Florida Jewish News

‘The main reason for French aliyah is Zionism, and that is fine’ – Israel Hayom

Posted By on July 14, 2017


Israel Hayom
'The main reason for French aliyah is Zionism, and that is fine'
Israel Hayom
French Ambassador to Israel Helene Le Gal says she supports French Jews who "want to come to Israel for Zionist values" She says France and Israel share common values and stresses that despite terrorism, France is still a preferred tourism destination.
UN Resolution Anti-Zionism = Anti-SemitismIntermountain Jewish News
Thomas L. Friedman: A double blow to IsraelPittsburgh Post-Gazette
Inclusion and the Jewish group that demonizes JewsJNS.org
Rutland Herald -Heritage Florida Jewish News -The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com
all 65 news articles »

Go here to see the original:
'The main reason for French aliyah is Zionism, and that is fine' - Israel Hayom

Stranger in a Strange Land by George Prochnik review Gershom Scholem and Zionism – The Guardian

Posted By on July 14, 2017

One day before the outbreak of the first world war, a precocious boy called Gerhard Scholem burst into a room at home and began the rite of symbolically castrating his father. Papa, I think I want to be a Jew, he exclaimed. He was planning to learn Hebrew, study the Bible and become a Zionist. His father, an assimilationist German businessman who despised his Jewish heritage, was appalled: You want to return to the ghetto? he asked. Youre the ones who are living in the ghetto, his son snapped back. Only you wont admit it.

Scholem meant that his father had established the family in a gilded bourgeois Jewish prison within a hostile German society his friend, Walter Benjamin, who grew up in a similarly privileged west Berlin milieu, described it as something of a ghetto held on lease. These rebellious sons turned out to be unwittingly prescient.

Such Oedipal confrontations were common in German-speaking lands during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, as the privileged sons of Jewish businessmen rebelled against their fathers devotion to bourgeois accumulation and deluded patriotism for a Wilhelmine polity that denied Jews equal rights. Some rebels such as Gerhards brother Werner (who would die in 1940 in Buchenwald) became communists. Others, Scholem for one, were attracted by the Zionist hopes advanced by political activist Theodor Herzl and philosopher Martin Buber. Scholem kept a portrait of the former on his bedroom wall, and felt a jolt of electricity when he heard Buber lecture and identify Jews as Orientals for whom the priority was mutuality and community, processes and relationships against the atomised, petrified western man of the senses.

He dreamed that the Jews could replace, as George Prochnik puts it, the attitude of impotent suffering with rambunctious perilously naked self-expression. Instead of being strangers in European lands, Jews could go home and become themselves not hobbled melancholics of the diaspora, nor spiritless worshippers of degrading consumer capitalism.

This at least was the messianic dream that led Scholem in 1923 to quit Germany for Palestine, where the young philologist and scholar of that mystical thread of Judaism called Kabbalah spent the rest of his life. That was the year of Hitlers beer hall putsch, only 10 years before the Nazi leader was elected German chancellor and 19 before the Wannsee conference implemented the Final Solution. Scholem figures as an antithesis of Stefan Zweig, subject of Prochniks previous book, the cosmopolitan humanist who couldnt abandon his idealised vision of European culture: Scholem is a hero to the author because of the virtuosity with which he developed alternative, non-European Jewish, visions.

In Jerusalem, Scholem changed his first name, becoming Gershom the name given by Moses to his son after the escape from Egypt. It was after that escape that Moses said: I have been a stranger in a strange land, with its implication (encoded in one meaning of the name Gershom) that the prophet was home after the woes of exile. But, for Scholem, anarchically esoteric exegete that he was, Gershom also meant Stranger is his name. Prochnik tells us he revelled in this paradox, glossing it thus: Once a stranger, now home; forever a stranger, by destiny. He was never at home, not quite.

Certainly if Scholem had been a stranger in Germany, he was to be differently alienated in his new home. Prochnik takes us through the history of British mandate-era Palestine to the creation in 1948 of the state of Israel, whose birth pangs were witnessed by Scholem. From the heights of the newly founded Hebrew University on Mount Scopus, the professor looked down on his disappointing people like a new Moses on Mount Sinai finding that, instead of Zionism meaning the transcendent salvation of the Jewish people, in practice it involved the recrudescence of godless western materialism, dubious religious conservatism and heartless treatment of the Arab population. He stayed but became something Guardian readers can identify with, a remoaner.

Yet Scholem also became a source of pride to the new Israel, symbol not of its martial valour or economic chutzpah but its intellectual excellence. Prime minister David Ben-Gurion reportedly shut his office for five days in 1957 and went to bed to read Scholems magnum opus on the false Jewish messiah, Sabbatai Sevi. Imagine, by way of parallel, Theresa May suspending Brexit negotiations to curl up with volume three of philosopher Derek Parfits On What Matters.

But thats only one thread of this ardent, beautifully written book. The other is Prochniks parallel rebellion and Zionist awakening in the late 1980s when he quit the US, converted to Judaism, learned Hebrew and settled in Jerusalem. He describes his upbringing in Fairfax City, Virginia, as spiritual violation. The despoliation he witnessed as malls consumed Americas wilderness resonated somehow with the ruins of European history that my fathers family had fled. Israel promised, or so it seemed, escape from both ruins. Like his hero, Prochnik was a first-born son sticking it to the old man for letting the flame of his Jewish identity burn down as low as it could go.

And so, one day in the late 80s he flew to Israel clutching his battered copy of Scholems On the Kabbalah and Its Mysticism. In Jerusalem he married Anne, an artist and teacher, and raised three children, all the while struggling with his writing career and with his place in, and commitment to, Israel. Like Scholem, only more so, he was both beguiled by and estranged from its realisation of Zionism rising consumerism, irksome dress codes, the unresolved Arab question.

As he delved deeper into Scholems mystical Jewish thought, Prochnik explored the notion of the Shekinah, roughly the glory of the divine presence interpreted in Kabbalism in feminine terms. Just as Aristophanes had imagined in Platos Symposium human nature split into gendered halves who yearned for their original wholeness, so Scholem suggested that a part of God Himself is exiled from God, namely the feminine part, who is the spiritual personification of exile and Jewish exile in particular. For Kabbalists and for Scholem, humanitys task of bringing Gods masculine and feminine aspects back to their foundational unity was akin to Zionisms dream of overcoming Jews exile.

One imagines Prochnik looking up from his exciting esoteric readings, to be confronted with Israels sometimes disappointing reality, gender-wise. Jewish religious practice, at worst, was hardly premised on rediscovering that foundational unity: Orthodoxy effectively cut women out completely from non-domestic religious activity, Prochnik writes. I felt there had to be a more meaningful role for women than just replicating male functions in a ritual territory demarcated and dust covered by men.

Other demarcations slowly impinge on Prochnik. At one poignant moment, he wonders why Arab boys cleaning tables at a restaurant arent at school. While he is graceful in admitting his omissions of empathy, the book reads as if he sometimes lost sight of how, to repurpose Walter Benjamins remark, Israeli civilisation, like every other in human history, has its barbarous flip side.

His estrangement came to a head with the 1995 murder of Yitzhak Rabin by ultraconservative student Yigal Amir, who was opposed to the prime ministers support for the Oslo peace accords that entailed Israeli withdrawal from West Bank settlements. The villain of Israels recent history, for Prochnik, emerges as the nations current prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who, before Rabins murder, made the breasts of conservatives swell with a sense of their own vigilante machismo while sending psychopaths into a frenzy.

He doesnt quite indict Netanyahu for creating favourable circumstances for Rabins assassination, but when Bibi was months later elected prime minister, it was time for Prochnik and Anne to leave for the US. He writes: the very thing that once drew us was what we needed to renounce. Worse, their marriage, founded on the joy of their Israeli adventure, couldnt survive the rupture. What remains, however, is Prochniks adoration for Scholem, and his unrealised and perhaps unrealisable notion of Zionist transcendence.

Stuart Jeffriess Grand Hotel Abyss: The Lives of the Frankfurt School is published by Verso.

Stranger in a Strange Land: Searching for Gershon Scholem and Jerusalem s published by Granta. To order a copy for 21.25 (RRP 25) go to bookshop.theguardian.com or call 0330 333 6846. Free UK p&p over 10, online orders only. Phone orders min p&p of 1.99.

Here is the original post:
Stranger in a Strange Land by George Prochnik review Gershom Scholem and Zionism - The Guardian

Synagogue membership? There are reasons to be hopeful – Jewish Chronicle

Posted By on July 14, 2017


Jewish Chronicle
Synagogue membership? There are reasons to be hopeful
Jewish Chronicle
Following last week's JPR report, it is important to spell out what this data means for the United Synagogue. Although the study did not supply specific data for the US, we recognise that as by far the largest synagogue movement of any denomination, we ...
Why there are no women on the Chief Rabbinate's 'blacklist'Jewish Telegraphic Agency
APN's Aaron Mann in Times of Israel blog: American Jewish leaders must be vocal on prayer and peace in IsraelAmericans for Peace Now
Fourteen Flaws in Tom Friedman's 'Israel to American Jews' New York Times ColumnAlgemeiner
State Times -Al-Monitor
all 65 news articles »

The rest is here:

Synagogue membership? There are reasons to be hopeful - Jewish Chronicle

How Gaza’s electricity crisis could spell trouble for Israel – Heritage Florida Jewish News

Posted By on July 14, 2017

AFP/Getty Images

A Palestinian boy cooling off during a heat wave at the al-Shati refugee camp in Gaza City, July 2, 2017.

JERUSALEM (JTA)-An internal Palestinian dispute has left Gaza's nearly 2 million Palestinian residents dangerously vulnerable to a heat wave, but Israel could get burned, too.

The West Bank Palestinian Authority has recently spearheaded a sharp reduction of electricity to the coastal enclave with Israel's cooperation, resulting in the exacerbation of Gaza's already dire humanitarian crisis and hints of new alliances that could lead to new military conflict with Israel.

The electricity cuts are part of a power play bythe Palestinian Authority against Hamas, its rival Palestinian faction that governs the territory. Hamas has looked to Egypt for help-a development that could auger further conflict with Israel.

Amid the political wrangling, a newU.N reportsaid Gaza gets electricity just four to six hours a day, down from the recent normal flow of eight to 12 hours a day.Water is availablea few hours every three to five days with desalination plants operating at 15 percent of capacity. Hospital care has suffered, and 29 million gallons of sewage is flooding into the Mediterranean Sea every day and threatening to overflow into the streets.

In recent days temperatures in the region have soared to over 98 degrees,with Israel reporting record-breaking demand for electricity on Sunday and Monday.

"The situation in Gaza has becoming increasingly precarious over recent months," Robert Piper, the United Nations' humanitarian coordinator for the Occupied Palestinian Territory, said in a plea to diplomats here Monday for $25.2 of emergency funding. "No one is untouched by the energy crisis."

How did Gaza get here?

In 2007, Hamas violently seized control of the territory from Fatah, the political faction that dominates the Palestinian Authority government. In the decade since the coup, Israel-along with Egypt-has largely sealed off Gazafrom land, air and sea.

According to Israel, theblockade is necessary to keep weapons and material out of the hands of Hamas, which has terrorized and warred with the Jewish state and vowed its destruction. Israelhas allowed humanitarian goods to enter Gaza and permitted some Gazans to come for medical care.

The Palestinian Authority has continued to pay for most of Gaza's electricity, which Israel has suppliedand is paid for with taxes it collects on behalf of the West Bank government. Gaza's sole power plant and, to a lesser extent, Egypt have supplied the rest.

The power crisisbegan in April, when the Gazapower plantshut down for lack of diesel fuel. Hamas refused to buy more fuel from the Palestinian Authority, complaining the taxes it charged were too high. In June, the Palestinian Authority announced it would reduce its payments to Israel for Gaza's electricity by 40 percent. In response, Israel has gradually decreasedthe power supply to the territory-by 35 percent as of Sunday.

The Palestinian Authority has said it hopes to pressure Hamas to hand over control of Gaza.Since April, the Palestinian Authority has also slashedthe salariesit has paid to tens of thousands of employees of the pre-Hamas government for not working and dramatically reduced medical aid to Gaza. On Tuesday, the Palestinian Authority fired more than 6,000 of those employees.

Rather than capitulating, Hamas has looked to Egypt for help. In late June, Cairobegansupplying fuel for Gaza's power plant-though not enough to compensate for the Israeli cuts.Hamas has also apparently been working toward forming a new governmentin Gaza with Mohammad Dahlan, a former Fatah strongmanin Gaza withclose ties to Egypt who helped broker the fuel shipments.

Making nice with Dahlan appeared to be an attempt by Hamas towin an opening of its Rafah border crossing with Egypt, which would give it a portalwith the outside world and alleviate the humanitarian crisis. Neither Hamas nor the Palestinian Authority have been on good terms with Dahlan. Hamas chased him out of Gaza in 2007, and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas exiled him from the Palestinian territories in 2011, deeming hima political threat.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman have said the electricity cuts are an internal Palestinian issueand Israel would restore full power were someone to foot the bill. But some officials have questioned whether Gaza's suffering is in Israel's interest. Energy Minister Yuval Steinitz, a close associate of the prime minister, last month saidit was "unacceptable" for Abbas to dictate Israeli policy.

Last week, municipal and regional leaders in Israel rejectedthe announcement of a government-planned pipeline that would require them totreat the sewage that has flowedinto their communities from waterwaysin northern Gaza.

"Israel's interest is to allocate electricity to Gaza for civilian causes," Alon Schuster, the head of the Shaar Hanegev Regional Council, told JTA. "I believe our policy should be to give the Palestinians what they need, and not to torture them in any case."

Hamas' political maneuvering could also have security implications. An alliance with Abbas' political nemesis might well widen the rift between Hamas and Fatah. Further, ifhistory is any guide, Hamas would make use of any increase in the flow of people and goods through Rafahto bolster its military capabilities. That would make another war with Israel all the more devastating.

View original post here:

How Gaza's electricity crisis could spell trouble for Israel - Heritage Florida Jewish News

How a Korean-Jewish entrepreneur uses food to empower immigrants – Jewish Post

Posted By on July 14, 2017

NEW YORK (JTA) Several times a month Jeanette Chawki welcomes a handful of strangers into her Brooklyn home. There, the visitors learn about life in her native Lebanon, talk about their own backgrounds, and eat food lots of it. Among the dishes visitors tried on a recent Saturday include freshly baked cheese-stuffed bread, tangy labneh with zaatar, chopped fattoush salad topped with fried pita bread and smoky babaganoush.

Chawki, a mother of three who moved to the United States in 2006, is one of nine instructors employed by the League of Kitchens, a New York-based business that offers cooking workshops taught by immigrant cooks.

She hopes that people come away from her class both with the ability to cook at least one new dish and a greater awareness of Lebanese culture.

I want [them] to know how Lebanese people are very generous, very friendly. I want to explain how we have [such a] wonderful country, its very nice, very good place to visit, and I would like to explain more about our food, Chawki said.

The League of Kitchens, whose name is a play on the League of Nations, was itself inspired by a familys unique immigration story: Founder Lisa Gross fathers family is of Hungarian Jewish heritage and moved to the United States in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, while her mother emigrated from Korea in her 20s.

The fact that I grew up moving between two cultures moving between American Jewish culture and Korean culture also underlies this whole project. That gave me a certain comfort and understanding how to move between cultures, and connect between cultures, and thats really what were doing here, creating these opportunities for cross-cultural learning and exchange, Gross told JTA.

Gross, who founded the business in 2014, said providing ways for people to interact with immigrants has taken on an added significance following the election of Donald Trump, who campaigned on a promise to build a wall on the border with Mexico and restrict Muslims from traveling to the U.S.

An interesting side effect of the election has been a growth of interest in our business. I think people feel like not only is this a cool and fun experience, but its taken on political significance of supporting a company that is very much about recognizing and celebrating immigrants, Gross said.

Workshops are taught by instructors from countries including Nepal, Mexico and Afghanistan, cost between $110 and $175 per person and run between two and a half to five and a half hours. Instructors receive 40-50 hours of paid training prior to teaching, are paid $25 per hour for the workshops, including preparation and clean up, and are compensated for ingredients.

I could really see and understand the immigrant experience in very personal way, said Gross, 35, a former food writer who founded the urban agriculture project Boston Tree Party. Its so clear to me how much our country is built by immigrants, and the immigrants who come here bring so much expertise, energy and passion, and they contribute so much to our culture and society and to our food culture American food is immigrant food.

During her childhood in Washington, D.C., Gross felt like both insider and outsider in two cultures.

There was a little bit of a feeling of I dont really fit totally in either one, she said. Obviously within a typical Ashkenazi American Jewish community, I look a little Asian thats become more and more common, especially for younger kids, but for my generation [it wasnt]. I definitely didnt fit into the Korean/Korean American community, which in a lot of ways is very homogeneous and also theyre Christian.

Still, that didnt stop Gross from being involved in the Jewish community. At the urging of her mother, who converted to Judaism prior to marrying her father, Gross attended a Jewish day school through the age of 13. And the family would go to her fathers parents to celebrate the holidays and eat traditional Jewish food.

Gross hopes her workshops can provide a way to reverse preconceived notions both about immigrants and chefs.

[T]he immigrant, instead of being the displaced person in the inferior position, in this situation the immigrant is the teacher, the expert, the host, and they are people with incredible knowledge and expertise, and the students are really excited to learn from them and to hear their stories, Gross said.

And though it wasnt intentional, all League of Kitchens instructors are women.

In our contemporary food media landscape, so often its the white male celebrity chef who is recognized and celebrated, when most cooking around the world is done by women. And here are women who are immigrant women, who people might pass them and not think twice, but they have something really special to share. Creating a way for them to share that is really exciting, she said.

Chawki, who has worked for League of Kitchens since its launch, said she has had people visiting from around the United States and the world including England, Canada, Switzerland to attend her workshops.

People are coming from different countries, faraway, just to eat my food, to have class with me. This really mean[s something] to me, Chawki said.

Read more here:

How a Korean-Jewish entrepreneur uses food to empower immigrants - Jewish Post

Southern Poverty Law Center brands some peaceful groups as ‘hate groups’ – Fox News

Posted By on July 14, 2017

The left-leaning Southern Poverty Law Center has come under fire for its labeling of a Christian nonprofit organization -- dedicated to defending "religious freedom, sanctity of life, and marriage and family" -- as a hate group.

But theAlliance Defending Freedom isn't the only conservative, traditional-value organization the SPLC smears as a hate group. Fox News found at least six other groups that are conservative and explicitly nonviolent but branded as hate organizations by the SPLC.

The SPLC based in Montgomery, Ala. is a nonprofitlegal advocacy organization specializing incivil rightsandpublic interest litigation, dedicated to "fighting hate and bigotry and to seeking justice for the most vulnerable members of our society. "

On June 11, Attorney General Jeff Sessions gave a speech to members of the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), the religious freedom group,prompting some media outlets, like ABC and NBC News, to label the ADF a "hate group."

A number of the socially conservative organizations the SPLC labels as hate groups, because of their views on LGBT issues, have beliefs about such issues that are strikingly similar to those of the Roman Catholic Church.

The networks reportedly base that characterization on the assessment of the SPLC.

The SPLC list includes several genuine hate groups such as the Ku Klux Klan and Neo-Nazi and Holocaust denial groups. But the organization's list also includes many conservative groups that -- while socially controversial -- are peaceful organizations that say they do not advocate hate or violence.

A hate group, by definition, is one that promotes and practices hatred, hostility, or violence toward members of a race, ethnicity, nation, religion, gender, gender identity or sexual orientation.

A number of the socially conservative organizations the SPLC labels as hate groups, because of their views on LGBT issues, have beliefs about such issues that are strikingly similar to those of the Roman Catholic Church.

In addition to the Alliance Defending Freedom, the SPLC also includes these socially conservative groups onits "hatewatch" list:

--Family Research Council, a nonprofit, charitable and conservative Christiangroup andlobbyingorganization. It says its mission is "to advance faith, family and freedom in public policy and the culture from a Christian worldview."

--American Family Association, a nonprofit group that promotes fundamentalist Christian values and opposes same-sex marriage, pornography and abortion.

--American College of Pediatricians,asocially conservativeadvocacy group ofpediatriciansand other health-care professionals. The group was founded in 2002 as a protest against the American Academy of Pediatrics' support foradoption by gay couples.

--Family Research Institute, a Colorado-based, nonprofit that states it has "... one overriding mission: to generate empirical research on issues that threaten the traditional family, particularly homosexuality, AIDS, sexual social policy, and drug abuse."

--World Congress of Families, a coalition that promotes Christian right values internationally and opposes same-sex marriage, pornography and abortion.

--Liberty Counsel,an international litigation, education and policy organization that says its dedicated to advancing religious freedom and protecting the sanctity of life.

Go here to read the rest:

Southern Poverty Law Center brands some peaceful groups as 'hate groups' - Fox News

Top UAE Official Slams Qatar-Owned Al-Jazeera for Anti-Semitism – TheTower.org

Posted By on July 14, 2017

In the latest sign of the growing rift between the Saudi-led Gulf states and Qatar, the foreign minister of the United Arab Emirates blasted Qatars Al-Jazeera network on Wednesday for promoting anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial.

Anwar Gargash, the UAEs minister for foreign affairs, charged that Al-Jazeera promoted anti-Semitic violence by broadcasting sermons by the spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, Yusuf al-Qaradawi,Agence France-Presse reported.

Qaradawi had also praised Hitler, described the Holocaust as divine punishment, and called on Allah to take this oppressive, Jewish, Zionist band of people and kill them, down to the very last one, Gargash added.

Gargashs criticism of the Qatari network came in a letter responding to charges by the United Nations that the Saudi-led effort to shut down Al-Jazeera violates press freedom.

David Kaye, the UNs special rapporteur on freedom of expression and opinion, saidthat shutting down Al-Jazeera would be a major blow against media pluralism. The Middle East is already suffering from severe restrictions on reporting and media, he added.

But Gargash responded that Freedom of expression cannot be used to justify and shield the promotion of extremist narratives, claiming that Al Jazeera is a platform for spreading terrorist ideology.

Gargashs letter referredto the broadcasting of an infamous sermon by Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi on Al-Jazeera in 2009. Al-Qaradawi addressed his message to the aggressor Jews, those arrogant plunderers, who act arrogantly toward the servants of Allah in the land of Allah. Al-Qaradhawi referred to Jews as treacherous and cunning, while calling on Allah to kill them all. Oh Allah, take this oppressive, Jewish, Zionist band of people. Oh Allah, do not spare a single one of them. Oh Allah, count their numbers, and kill them, down to the very last one, Al-Qaradhawi said.

This is not the first time Al-Jazeera has been accused of promoting anti-Semitism. There is no doubt that anti-Semitism is woven into the fabric of Al Jazeeras Arabic reporting, Erik Nisbet, a professor of Arabic media at Ohio State University, saidin 2011. Nisbet went on to compare Al-Jazeeras reporting to an American channel giving airtime to the Ku Klux Klan.

The Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission notedin 2004 that Al-Jazeera host Faisal Al-Qassam frequently made anti-Semitic remarks on his weekly show, with one episode titled, Is Zionism worse than Nazism. Al-Qassam referred to Jews as apes and pigs, and recommended that the U.S. get rid of its Jews. The Commission quoted Al-Qassam as saying, God will not be deterred unless there is a true holocaust that will exterminate all of [the Jews] at once.

A guest on Al-Qassams show, Saudi cleric Abdallah Bib Matruk Al-Haddal, said that the September 11th attacks were a continuation of an ancient attack. It is a continuation of the Jewish deception and the Jewish-Zionist wickedness. Al-Haddal concluded that Jewish fingerprints have infiltrated the U.S., Jewish evil and deception are those who attacked the U.S. The claim that Jews are responsible for the September 11th attacks is awidely debunked anti-Semitic conspiracy theory.

[Photo:Wochit Politics / YouTube]

Continue reading here:

Top UAE Official Slams Qatar-Owned Al-Jazeera for Anti-Semitism - TheTower.org

UK Hasidic school faced with closure for not teaching LGBT – The Times of Israel

Posted By on July 14, 2017

An ultra-Orthodox girls elementary school in London may be forced to close after failing to meet government standards because it does not teach about homosexuality and transgender issues.

The Vishnitz Girls School, a private elementary school in the London suburb of Stamford Hill, failed three consecutive inspections from UKs Office for Standards in Education, Childrens Services and Skills (Ofsted) according to a report released last month. Although the school received a positive review in almost every area, it failed the inspection because they do not teach pupils about all the protected characteristics, particularly those relating to gender re-assignment and sexual orientation.

The school, which has 212 pupils aged between three and eight years old, was rated as good by inspectors four years ago. But now the government may force it to close down.

According to the Ofsted report the religious values of the school mean it cannot comply with government requirements. The proprietor and leaders agreed that the schools policy on the protected characteristics meant that the school could not meet these standards, the report stated.

The schools approach means that pupils are shielded from learning about certain differences between people, such as sexual orientation, inspectors wrote. This means that pupils have a limited understanding of the different lifestyles and partnerships that individuals may choose in present-day society.

Inspectors said that the school, which caters to the local Vizhnitz hasidic community, covers all the required areas of learning for the proposed increase in age range, from three to eight years to three to 12 years.

Ofsted also acknowledged that the school showed tolerance to other cultures and value systems. The schools culture is, however, clearly focused on teaching pupils to respect everybody, regardless of beliefs and lifestyle, the report said.

Staff were praised in the report, which stated that teachers good subject knowledge and high-quality classroom resources inspire pupils with enthusiasm for learning and to achieve well.

Yet because of its failure to teach about different sexual orientations the school was threatened with closure.

Hasidic Jews try to shield themselves in many ways from modern cultures which they feel contradict the religious lifestyle they have chosen for themselves. Inspectors noted that most girls speak Yiddish as their first language.

The ultra-Orthodox community is known for strict gender separation in public events and extremely high standards of modest dress. Members of the community are urged to shun the internet and smart phones, and any discussion of sexuality is left to the family, rather than to the school.

Orthodox Jews consider homosexuality and transgenderism to be forbidden by Jewish law.

Read this article:

UK Hasidic school faced with closure for not teaching LGBT - The Times of Israel


Page 1,448«..1020..1,4471,4481,4491,450..1,4601,470..»

matomo tracker