Page 149«..1020..148149150151..160170..»

Forever on Edge – The American Mind

Posted By on April 16, 2023

The Anti-Defamation League must confect a rising tide of antisemitic fervor or else go out of business.

The medias alarmism over the hate pandemic that seems never to abate in white America has dominated conservative dialogue at least since the 2014 killing of Michael Brown in Ferguson, a significant moment in the history of our racial reckoning. But, of course, frustration with the legacy media over race and other related issues has been bubbling up for some time.

A useful data point validating these long-held frustrations over race-baiting sensationalism is the number of uncritical media citations of the Anti-Defamation League over the last few decades. Given the ADLs certainly rocky historyreplete, as it is, with criminal investigations, judicial condemnations, fabricated research, and bipartisan criticismone wonders why major media outlets like CNN and the New York Times trust them at all.

Recently, the ADL released an annual report purporting to gauge the level of antisemitism in the U.S. As usual, journalists uncritically reported on its conclusions which found thatantisemitism is high, rising, and should be of grave concern to the nation.The report found that nearly nine in ten survey respondents believe in at least one anti-Jewish trope, supposedly a big jump from 2019 when it was six in ten. Also, one-fifth of respondents believe in six or more such tropes, nearly doubling over the same period. Without any journalistic scrutiny, however, consumers of the coverage no doubt missed the tricks the ADL deploys in arriving at these seemingly surprising conclusions.

To statements like Jews are more loyal to Israel than to America or Jews stick together more than other Americans, survey respondents could answer false, somewhat true, or mostly true. (The unsure/dont know was option was removed for this report, making it difficult to compare the survey to those of previous years.)Rather arbitrarily, the report also concludes that anyone who answers somewhat true or mostly true to 11 of the 14 statements is a hardcore anti-Semite.

All of this is significant, says ADL critic Ran HaCohen. Quoting survey expert John Krosnick, HaCohen argued that similar polling techniques used in a previous ADL report years back are designed to inclinepeople toward accepting assertions, rather than thinking more extensively and seeing the flaws in those assertions. To limit response choices and allow respondents to pick less certain and less meaningful answers (e.g., somewhat versus mostly true) curbs deep reflection and nudges otherwise unsure respondents in a specific direction.

There is also an in-built tendency toward higher results in the form of numerous survey statements being largely similar. For instance, if you answered somewhat true to Jews have too much power in the business world, you are likely to answer the same for Jews have too much control and influence on Wall Street.It is worth noting that around 20 percent of respondents answered at least somewhat true to the too much power statements. But if this is truly alarming, one should wonder about the level of unease if another racial group replaced Jews in these questionsnamely Gentile whites, or perhaps East or South Asians.

Citing the Authoritarian Personality, an infamously un-empirical and ideologically-driven study written in 1950 by neo-Marxist Theodore Adorno, were told that any belief in these tropes can lead to hostility and violence against Jews. Does a significant part of the country believe in such potentially violent ideas? Yes, were told that 85% believe in at least one (that is, to at least one they answered somewhat true.)

The percentage who believe in each of the statements, however, is small, at just three percent. But if you extrapolate that to the rest of the country, the report tells us that it corresponds to approximately 8 million peoplemore than the number of Jews in the United States. (My emphasis.) Clearly, this framing is designed to induce terror and fear.

Despite such doom-laden conclusions about Jewish security in America, no survey experts or critics of the group (and there are plenty) were consulted in any of the coverage I could find. Moreover, reporters werent able to scrutinize the underlying data from the survey. The ADL actually handed off the public release of the data to the University of Michigans InterUniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research. But when I asked for it (twice), I got nowhere.It would be nice, for instance, to see how the ADLs data breaks down by race and ethnicity. Or to confirm that removing unsure from the response options did not, in fact, affect things much (something the ADLs press people told one outlet).

Anti-Semitism in the U.S.

That the ADL traffics in false narratives about a supposed antisemitic pandemic in America is not controversial. Criticseven from the Lefthave long pilloried the problems in their research and, just like the Southern Poverty Law Center, even ADL-insiders have admitted they are intentionally alarmist.

In an interview about the ADL, Noam Chomsky said that antisemitism in the U.S. does not equate to a pandemic and maybe comes up to a thousandth in the ranking of national problems. The Village Voices David Klinghoffer once wrote that antisemitism is an obsession for the ADL. In the American Jewish community, weve got anti-Semitism without anti-Semites, Klinghoffer averred. Or almost without anti-Semites. In a country as big as American you are inevitably going to find nuts and cranks, haters and despisers, of every descriptionif you look hard enough.

In fact, the ADL has a history of concocting hate hoaxes. It once created a phony New York City chapter of the Christian Patriots Defense League, an Illinois-based paramilitary group, ostensibly to prove that dangerous hate groups were on the rise. ADL members apparently were interviewed for a TV documentary in which they wore fake moustaches and costumes and spouted stereotypical hateful rhetoric.In another instance, ADL agent James Mitchel Rosenberg worked covertly to befriend figures in the KKK and even spoke at their rallies and other meetings with extremists. Another ADL spy, Roy Bullock,attended Holocaust-revisionist events and urged attendees to join Arab civil rights groups so he couldout them as neo-Nazis.

As U.S. extremism expert Laird Wilcox has written in The Watchdogs, his masterful critique of hate-watch groups, the ADL has never copped to any of this. I suspect there have been more cases like this, he says. This is but one more reason why journalists and others should be extremely wary of this organization.

While these examples all took place in the eighties and nineties, current CEO Jonathan Goldblatt appears just as committed to stoking anxiety in the community the ADL purports to represent. Take, for instance, his statement in 2016 that the rise in antisemitism in the U.S. is just as alarming as it was in the 1930sthat is, the period leading up to the Holocaust. Or his relaying of uncorroborated reports to CNN about antisemites driving through Jewish neighborhoods in L.A. throwing bottles at houses with mezuzahs on their doors.

Why the ADL Does What It Does

As to why the ADL fearmongers, the reasons are no doubt manifold. Money could be a mitigating factor. In Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History, Norman Finkelstein joked that were he not able to conjure up antisemitism, former ADL national director Abraham Foxman would have to find a real jobor one that pays the equivalent of his ADL salary at the time of $500,000 a year. Its civil-rights work has always simply been a con for bilking gullible Northern liberals, wrote one former staffer in the New Yorker.

But among the few critics who have seriously engaged with the question of why the ADL manufactures anxiety around antisemitism, its commitment to Israel is the most popular theory. Scaremongering American Jews,as well as Gentiles, about supposed antisemitic threats indirectly lends the Israeli state greater legitimacy, inoculates the country from criticism, and encourages aliyah, or the immigration ofJews from the diaspora to West Bank settlements and elsewhere.

It isnt far-fetched. Chomsky has said that anti-semitism is manufacturedvery consciously by the ADL and that insinuations of anti-Semitism or direct accusations, are intended to deflect or undermine opposition to Israeli policies. In fact, its also much of the premise of Yoav Shamirs 2009 documentary Defamation. In making the film, Shamir was given unprecedented, months-long access to Foxman, documenting numerous eye-opening scenes, including the latter offering to provide the Ukrainian government with important U.S. contacts if they agreed not to publicly compare the Holodomor (Stalins manufactured starvation of millions) to the Holocaust.

Certainly the ADLs commitment to the Jewish homeland could not be more fulsome, sometimes even eclipsing not just basic ethical standards but the law as well.

Theres the 1985 spy case of U.S. intelligence analyst Jonathan Pollard , who was sentenced to life in prison for sending a Top Secret information over many years to the Israeli Defense Force. Pollards handler was Avi Sella, an Israeli Air Force Colonel whose wife worked for the ADL as a lawyer at the time. The ADL ran legal- and PR-cover for Pollard, who stated that the organizationwas itself involved in spy operations.

Most alarmingly, the major player in the ADLs spy operations, Roy Bullock, was found in possession of a floorplan for the offices of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee as well as a key belonging to the groups executive director, Alexander Odeh. The materials were found after the groups offices were bombed and Odeh was killed. Although members of the terrorist organization the Jewish Defense League were later convicted for the killing, this fact is deeply troubling.

Israel Probably Doesnt Need the Help

Writing in The New Republic in the nineties, J.J. Goldberg summed up the expansion of the charge of anti-Semitism well when he wrote: Before World War II, anti-Semitism was defined as wanting to harm Jews. In the post-war era, it was broadened to include prejudice that might lead one to wish Jews harm. More recently, its come to mean any stereotypeor disagreementwith the Jewish community. Today, thanks to the ADL, Goldbergs list would surely include unfairly criticizing Israeli policy as well.

Expanding the definition of antisemitism so that Israel becomes akin to a Jew among nations was first conjured up by the ADL in the 1970s with the publication of then-CEO Arnold Forsters book, The New Antisemitism. The decades-long campaign has certainly been a success, having been incorporated into the official definitions of antisemitism of the U.S. State Department as well as the Canadian government.

But how traceable this and other forms of the ADLs advocacy has been to Israels success today is far from clear.

In fact, on the 75th anniversary of its founding, Israels doing just fine. Today the country has a higher life-expectancy than the U.S.; a higher GDP per capita than Italy, Japan, and Spain; and its most hostile neighbors over the years have either been neutered or placated, losing its mantle perhaps of being that lone outpost of civilization against barbarism, as Theodor Herzl once said.

Israel also faces no crisis in group identity or collective self-confidence. In fact, its probably unmatched in these departments vis-a-vis any other Western nation today. Such self-assuredness goes back generations and is basically inscribed in the nations DNA. Consider that Israel is the only developed nation in the world with a replacement-level birthrate, and that the Jewish birthrate is higher than the Israeli Arab rate.

Growing up in a creedal, hyper-individualistic nation like the U.S.and at a time when most liberal elites eschew civic patriotismits possible some of the ADLs American supporters fail to understand or appreciate Israels fundamentally ethnocratic and sui generis character. Unlike the U.S., as well as other Western nations, Israel was founded and is maintained as a state embodying an explicit majoritarian Jewish identity. Israel is different from other countries, said Chief Justice Aharon Barak. It is not only a democratic State, but also a Jewish State. Its quasi-constitutional Basic Law, along with other fundamental laws, ensures that American-style individual rights and creedal values, while present, always take a back seat when it comes to public policy formation and national guidance generally. Interior Minister Eli Yishai once said vis-a-vis Israels immigration policy: In having to choose between being called enlightened and liberal but not having a Jewish and Zionist state, and being called endarkened and racist but being a proud citizen, I choose the second option. The era of slogans has ended.

Say what you will about such sentiment, but Jewish identity is etched into Israels legal and foundational fabric, a fact clearly recognized by its ultra-confident national leaders. Help from groups like the ADL simply is not needed.

Constructed Crisis-Bonding

Perhaps it is arguable that the ADLs astroturfed ploys have produced a kind of group solidarity among Jews. In ShamirsDefamation, ADL members admit this, telling the director thatlacking a common religion, anti-Semitism is now used to bond, and form the identity of, the secular Jewish community. And asHaCohen sees it, in the ADLs mind, anti-Semitism should always be on the rise, to boost our national cohesion.

Maybe the ADLs performative crisis-mongering does give some American Jews a greater feeling of solidarity; that is, among themselves, their fellow co-ethnics in the greater diaspora, and with Israel itself.

But is this the kind of solidarity Jews want or need? That is, a solidarity resting on a foundation of suspicion and delusion that fosters a siege-like mentality? It is not speculative that decades of the ADLs incessant fearmongering have had the effect of neuroticizing many within the Jewish community. J.J. Goldberg writes,some Jewish agency staffers insist the alarmist tone set by a few national Jewish agenciesis a key cause of Jewish anxiety. Fingers point most often at the ADL. AndasRabbi Hecht puts it inDefamation: Clearly, the ADL has been responsible in certain areas to flare up things as much as theyve helped.

So if solidaritys a benefit, what are the disbenefits?Are American Jews afflicted with greater anxiety, perhaps to the point of being irrationally suspicious of their Gentile neighbors? Are Jews hunkering down and dropping out of American civic life? How many have made aliyah to the relatively hard life in the West Bank settlements based on these worries only to end up regretting it?

If the ADLs campaigns are essential to ethno-cultural solidarity, what you have is essentially a Ponzi schemeone that requires ever more antisemitic inflation, hate hoaxes, fake research, and phony outrage. In the face of improved Jewish-Gentile and race relations more generally,the ADL will have to become increasingly deranged to keep up its relevance, political clout, and profitability.

Positive Solidarity?

The ADL commands an 800-person staff and an annual budget of $70 million. To ensure Jews dont stray from the herd, it can and should spend its resources on better, more positive things than feigned histrionics and out-group antagonism. Certainly, there are enough points of pride among Jews for the ADL to foster an equally strong and far healthier form of in-group cohesion. After all, the Jews brought an ancient language into the modern world, turning it into their nations mother tongue in a single generationrevitalizing a biblical language with no words for car, plastic, transistor, etc. cant be easy.

Diverse, multicultural societies are low trust societies. Within them, intergroup conflict is inevitable, so its paramount that powerful elites like Goldblatt foster conciliation between competing groups rather than suspicion. This means all out-group criticisms,and certainly accusations of out-group predation, must be done with the utmost sensitivity, reflection, care, and precision (if they need be done at all). Looking at the ADLs past and current behavior, however, its unlikely this will happen soon, if ever.

To the extent the ADL engages in pseudo-research and pseudo-terror, it is a pseudo-advocacy group and a scam perpetrated on both the Jewish community as well as the country as a whole. They exist in the public sphere solely because the media fails in its job in reporting real, meaningful news and in holding the power centers of the country accountable. Unless, you are a member of the pseudo-media, the ADL does not deserve a moment of your attention.

View original post here:
Forever on Edge - The American Mind

History of antisemitism in the United States – Wikipedia

Posted By on April 16, 2023

There have been different opinions among historians with regard to the extent of antisemitism in America's past and how American antisemitism contrasted with its European counterpart. Earlier students of American Jewish life minimized the presence of antisemitism in the United States, which they considered a late and alien phenomenon that arose on the American scene in the late 19th century. More recently however, scholars have asserted that no period in American Jewish history was free from antisemitism. The debate about the significance of antisemitism during different periods of American history has continued to the present day.[1]

The first governmental incident of anti-Jewish sentiment was recorded during the American Civil War, when General Ulysses S. Grant issued a General Order (quickly rescinded by President Abraham Lincoln) of expulsion against Jews from the portions of Tennessee, Kentucky and Mississippi that were under his control.

During the first half of the 20th century, Jews were discriminated against and barred from working in some fields of employment, barred from renting and/or owning certain properties, not accepted as members by social clubs, barred from resort areas and barred from enrolling in colleges by quotas. Antisemitism reached its peak during the interwar period with the rise of the Ku Klux Klan in the 1920s, antisemitic publications in The Dearborn Independent, and incendiary radio speeches by Father Coughlin in the late 1930s.

Following World War II and the Holocaust, anti-Jewish sentiment significantly declined in the United States. However, there has been an upsurge in the number of antisemitic hate crimes in recent years.

In the mid 17th century, Peter Stuyvesant, the last Director-General of the Dutch colony of New Netherland, sought to maintain the position of the Dutch Reformed Church in America refusing to allow other denominations such as Lutherans, Catholics and Quakers the right to organize a church. He also described Jews as "deceitful", "very repugnant", and "hateful enemies and blasphemers of the name of Christ".[2] Prior to this, the inhabitants of the Dutch settlement of Vlishing had declared that "the law of love, peace, and liberty" extended to "Jews, Turks, and Egyptians."[3]

According to Peter Knight, throughout most of the 18th and 19th centuries, the United States rarely experienced antisemitic action comparable to the sort that was endemic in Europe during the same period.[4] Jews were viewed as a race beginning in the 1870s, but this understanding was considered positive, as Jews were viewed as white. [5]

Major General Ulysses S. Grant was influenced by these sentiments and issued General Order No. 11 expelling Jews from areas under his control in western Tennessee:

The Jews, as a class violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department and also department orders, are hereby expelled ... within twenty-four hours from the receipt of this order.

Grant later issued an order "that no Jews are to be permitted to travel on the road southward." His aide, Colonel John V. DuBois, ordered "all cotton speculators, Jews, and all vagabonds with no honest means of support", to leave the district. "The Israelites especially should be kept out ... they are such an intolerable nuisance."

This order was quickly rescinded by President Abraham Lincoln but not until it had been enforced in a number of towns.[6] According to Jerome Chanes, Lincoln's revocation of Grant's order was based primarily on "constitutional strictures against ... the federal government singling out any group for special treatment." Chanes characterizes General Order No. 11 as "unique in the history of the United States" because it was the only overtly antisemitic official action of the United States government.[7]

Between 1881 and 1920, approximately 3 million Ashkenazi Jews from Eastern Europe immigrated to America, many of them fleeing pogroms and the difficult economic conditions which were widespread in much of Eastern Europe during this time. Pogroms in the Russian Empire prompted waves of Jewish immigrants after 1881. Jews, along with many Eastern and Southern European immigrants, came to work the country's growing mines and factories. Many Americans distrusted these Jewish immigrants.[6]

Between 1900 and 1924, approximately 1.75 million Jews immigrated to America's shores, the bulk from Eastern Europe. Whereas before 1900, American Jews never amounted even to 1 percent of America's total population, by 1930 Jews formed about 3.5 percent. This dramatic increase, combined with the upward mobility of some Jews, contributed to a resurgence of antisemitism.

As the European immigration swelled the Jewish population of the United States, there developed a growing sense of Jews as different. Indeed, the United States government's Census Bureau classified Jews as their own race, Hebrews, and a 1909 effort led by Simon Wolf to remove Hebrew as a race through a Congressional bill failed.[5] Jerome Chanes attributes this perception on the fact that Jews were concentrated in a small number of occupations: they were perceived as being mostly clothing manufacturers, shopkeepers and department store owners. He notes that so-called "German Jews" (who in reality came not just from Germany but from Austria-Hungary and other countries as well) found themselves increasingly segregated by a widespread social antisemitism that became even more prevalent in the twentieth century and which persists in vestigial form even today.[8]

In the middle of the 19th century, a number of German Jewish immigrants founded investment banking firms which later became mainstays of the industry. Most prominent Jewish banks in the United States were investment banks, rather than commercial banks.[9][10] Although Jews played only a minor role in the nation's commercial banking system, the prominence of Jewish investment bankers such as the Rothschild family in Europe, and Jacob Schiff, of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. in New York City, made the claims of antisemites believable to some.

One example of allegations of Jewish control of world finances, during the 1890s, is Mary Elizabeth Lease, an American farming activist and populist from Kansas, who frequently blamed the Rothschilds and the "British bankers" as the source of farmers' ills.[11]

The Morgan Bonds scandal injected populist antisemitism into the 1896 presidential campaign. It was disclosed that President Grover Cleveland had sold bonds to a syndicate which included J. P. Morgan and the Rothschilds house, bonds which that syndicate was now selling for a profit, the Populists used it as an opportunity to uphold their view of history, and argue that Washington and Wall Street were in the hands of the international Jewish banking houses.

Another focus of antisemitic feeling was the allegation that Jews were at the center of an international conspiracy to fix the currency and thus the economy to a single gold standard.[12]

According to Deborah Dash Moore, populist antisemitism used the Jew to symbolize both capitalism and urbanism so as to personify concepts that were too abstract to serve as satisfactory objects of animosity.[13]

Richard Hofstadter describes populist antisemitism as "entirely verbal." He continues by asserting that, "(it) was a mode of expression, a rhetorical style, not a tactic or a program." He notes that, "(it) did not lead to exclusion laws, much less to riots or pogroms." Hofstadter still concludes, however, that the "Greenback-Populist tradition activated most of ... modern popular antisemitism in the United States."

In the first half of the 20th century, Jews were discriminated against in employment, access to residential and resort areas, membership in clubs and organizations, and in tightened quotas on Jewish enrollment and teaching positions in colleges and universities. Restaurants, hotels and other establishments that barred Jews from entry were called "restricted".[14]

In 1913, a Jewish-American in Atlanta named Leo Frank was convicted for the rape and murder of Mary Phagan, a 13-year-old Christian girl who he employed. In the middle of the night on April 27, 1913, a 13-year-old girl named Mary Phagan was found dead by a night watchman in the basement of a pencil factory in Atlanta, Georgia.[15] Leo Frank, the superintendent of the factory, was the last person to acknowledge seeing her alive earlier that day after paying her weekly wages. Detectives took Frank to the scene of the crime and the morgue to view the body. After further questioning, they concluded that he was most likely not the murderer. In the days following, rumors began to spread amongst the public that the girl had been sexually assaulted prior to her death. This sparked outrage amongst the public which called for immediate action and justice for her murder. On April 29, following Phagan's funeral, public outrage reached its pinnacle. Under immense pressure to identify a suspect, detectives arrested Leo Frank on the same day. Being a Jewish factory owner, previously from the north, Frank was an easy target for the antisemitic population who already distrusted northern merchants who had come to the south to work following the American Civil War.[16][17] During the trial, the primary witness was Jim Conley, a black janitor who worked at the factory. Initially a suspect, Conley became the state's main witness in the trial against Frank.

Prior to the trial, Conely had given four conflicting statements regarding his role in the murder. In court, the Frank's lawyers were unable to disprove Conley's claims that he was forced by Frank to dispose of Phagan's body. The trial gathered immense attention especially from Atlantans, who gathered in large crowds around the courthouse demanding for a guilty verdict. In addition to this, much of the media coverage at the time took an antisemitic tone and after 25 days, Leo Frank was found guilty of murder on August 25 and sentenced to death by hanging on August 26. The verdict was met with cheers and celebration form the crowd. Following the verdict, Frank's lawyers submitted a total of five appeals to the Georgia Supreme Court as well as the U.S. Supreme Court claiming that Frank's absence on the day of the verdict and the amount of public pressure and influence swayed the jury. After this, the case was brought to Georgia governor John M. Slaton. Despite the public demanding for him to hold the verdict, Slaton changed Frank's verdict from death sentence to life imprisonment, believing that his innocence would eventually be established and he would be set free.[16] This decision was met with immense public outrage, causing riots and even forcing Slaton to declare Martial Law at one point. On August 16, 1915, 25 citizens stormed a prison farm in Milledgeville where Leo Frank was being held. Taking Frank from his cell, they drove him to Marietta, the hometown of Mary Phagan, and hanged him from a tree. Leaders of the lynch mob would later gather at Stone Mountain to revive the Ku Klux Klan.

In response to the lynching of Leo Frank, Sigmund Livingston founded the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) under the sponsorship of B'nai B'rith. The ADL became the leading Jewish group fighting antisemitism in the United States. The lynching of Leo Frank coincided with and helped spark the revival of the Ku Klux Klan. The Klan disseminated the view that anarchists, communists and Jews were subverting American values and ideals.

With the American entry into World War I, Jews were targeted by antisemites as "slackers" and "war-profiteers" responsible for many of the ills of the country. For example, a U.S. Army manual published for war recruits stated that, "The foreign born, and especially Jews, are more apt to malinger than the native-born." When ADL representatives protested about this to President Woodrow Wilson, he ordered the manual recalled. The ADL also mounted a campaign to give Americans the facts about military and civilian contributions of Jews to the war effort.[18]

Antisemitism in the United States reached its peak during the interwar period.[citation needed] The rise of the Ku Klux Klan in the 1920s, the antisemitic works of newspapers and radio speeches in the late 1930s indicated the strength of attacks on the Jewish community.

One element in American antisemitism during the 1920s was the identification of Jews with Bolshevism where the concept of Bolshevism was used pejoratively in the country. (see article on "Jewish Bolshevism").

Immigration legislation enacted in the United States in 1921 and 1924 was interpreted widely as being at least partly anti-Jewish in intent because it strictly limited the immigration quotas of eastern European nations with large Jewish populations, nations from which approximately 3 million Jews had immigrated to the United States by 1920.

Jews encountered resistance when they tried to move into white-collar and professional positions. Banking, insurance, public utilities, medical schools, hospitals, large law firms and faculty positions, restricted the entrance of Jews. This era of "polite" Judeophobia through social discrimination, underwent an ideological escalation in the 1930s.

In 1924, Congress passed the JohnsonReed Act severely restricting immigration. Although the act did not specifically target Jews, the effect of the legislation was that 86% of the 165,000 permitted entries were from Northern European countries, with Germany, Britain, and Ireland having the highest quotas. The act effectively diminished the flow of Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe to a trickle.

Henry Ford was a pacifist who opposed World War I, and he believed that Jews were responsible for starting wars in order to profit from them: "International financiers are behind all war. They are what is called the international Jew: German Jews, French Jews, English Jews, American Jews. I believe that in all those countries except our own the Jewish financier is supreme ... here the Jew is a threat".[19] Ford believed that Jews were responsible for capitalism, and in their role as financiers, they did not contribute anything of value to society.[20]

In 1915, during World War I, Ford blamed Jews for instigating the war, saying "I know who caused the war: German-Jewish bankers."[21] Later, in 1925, Ford said "What I oppose most is the international Jewish money power that is met in every war. That is what I opposea power that has no country and that can order the young men of all countries out to death'". According to author Steven Watts, Ford's antisemitism was partially due to a noble desire for world peace.[21][22]

Ford became aware of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion and believed it to be a legitimate document, and he published portions of it in his newspaper, the Dearborn Independent. Also, in 192021 the Dearborn Independent carried a series of articles expanding on the themes of financial control by Jews, entitled:[23]

One of the articles, "Jewish Power and America's Money Famine", asserted that the power exercised by Jews over the nation's supply of money was insidious by helping deprive farmers and others outside the banking coterie of money when they needed it most. The article asked the question: "Where is the American gold supply? ... It may be in the United States but it does not belong to the United States" and it drew the conclusion that Jews controlled the gold supply and, hence, American money.[24]

Another of the articles, "Jewish Idea Molded Federal Reserve System" was a reflection of Ford's suspicion of the Federal Reserve System and its proponent, Paul Warburg. Ford believed the Federal Reserve system was secretive and insidious.[25]

These articles gave rise to claims of antisemitism against Ford,[26] and in 1929 he signed a statement apologizing for the articles.[27]

Antisemitic activists in the 1930s were led by Father Charles Coughlin, William Dudley Pelley and Gerald L. K. Smith. Ford's attacks on Jews continued to be circulated, although the KKK was practically defunct. They promulgated various interrelated conspiracy theories, widely spreading the fear that Jews were working for the destruction or replacement of white Americans and Christianity in the U.S.[28][29]

According to Gilman and Katz, antisemitism increased dramatically in the 1930s with demands being made to exclude American Jews from American social, political and economic life.[30]

During the 1930s and 1940s, right-wing demagogues linked the Great Depression of the 1930s, the New Deal, President Franklin Roosevelt, and the threat of war in Europe to the machinations of an imagined international Jewish conspiracy that was both communist and capitalist. A new ideology appeared which accused "the Jews" of dominating Franklin Roosevelt's administration, of causing the Great Depression, and of dragging the United States into World War II against a new Germany which deserved nothing but admiration. Roosevelt's "New Deal" was derisively referred to as the "Jew Deal".[30]

Father Charles Coughlin, a radio preacher, as well as many other prominent public figures, condemned "the Jews," Gerald L. K. Smith, a Disciples of Christ minister, was the founder (1937) of the Committee of One Million and publisher (beginning in 1942) of The Cross and the Flag, a magazine that declared that "Christian character is the basis of all real Americanism." Other antisemitic agitators included Fritz Julius Kuhn of the German-American Bund, William Dudley Pelley, and the Rev. Gerald Winrod.

In the end, promoters of antisemitism achieved no more than a passing popularity as the threat of Nazi Germany became more and more evident to the American electorate. Steven Roth asserts that there was never a real possibility of a "Jewish question" appearing on the American political agenda as it did in Europe; according to Roth, the resistance to political antisemitism in the United States was due to the heterogeneity of the American political structure.[31]

In a 1938 poll, approximately 60 percent of the respondents held a low opinion of Jews, labeling them "greedy," "dishonest," and "pushy."[32] 41 percent of respondents agreed that Jews had "too much power in the United States," and this figure rose to 58 percent by 1945.[33] Several surveys taken from 1940 to 1946 found that Jews were seen as a greater threat to the welfare of the United States than any other national, religious, or racial group.[34]

The main spokesman for antisemitic sentiment was Charles Coughlin, a Catholic priest whose weekly radio program drew between 5 and 12 million listeners in the late 1930s. Coughlin's newspaper, Social Justice, reached a circulation of 800,000 at its peak in 1937.

After the 1936 election, Coughlin increasingly expressed sympathy for the fascist policies of Hitler and Mussolini, as an antidote to Bolshevism. His weekly radio broadcasts became suffused with themes regarded as overtly antisemitic. He blamed the Depression on an international conspiracy of Jewish bankers, and also claimed that Jewish bankers were behind the Russian Revolution.[35]

Coughlin began publication of a newspaper, Social Justice, during this period, in which he printed antisemitic polemics such as The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Like Joseph Goebbels, Coughlin claimed that Marxist atheism in Europe was a Jewish plot. The 5 December 1938 issue of Social Justice included an article by Coughlin which closely resembled a speech made by Goebbels on 13 September 1935 attacking Jews, atheists and communists, with some sections being copied verbatim by Coughlin from an English translation of the Goebbels speech.

On November 20, 1938, two weeks after Kristallnacht, when Jews across Germany were attacked and killed, and Jewish businesses, homes and synagogues burned, Coughlin blamed the Jewish victims,[36] saying that "Jewish persecution only followed after Christians first were persecuted." After this speech, and as his programs became more antisemitic, some radio stations, including those in New York and Chicago, began refusing to air his speeches without pre-approved scripts; in New York, his programs were cancelled by WINS and WMCA, leaving Coughlin to broadcasting on the Newark part-time station WHBI. This made Coughlin a hero in Nazi Germany, where papers ran headlines like: "America is Not Allowed to Hear the Truth."

On December 18, 1938, two thousand of Coughlin's followers marched in New York protesting potential asylum law changes that would allow more Jews (including refugees from Hitler's persecution) into the US, chanting, "Send Jews back where they came from in leaky boats!" and "Wait until Hitler comes over here!" The protests continued for several months. Donald Warren, using information from the FBI and German government archives, has also argued that Coughlin received indirect funding from Nazi Germany during this period.[37]

After 1936, Coughlin began supporting an organization called the Christian Front, which claimed him as an inspiration. In January, 1940, the Christian Front was shut down when the FBI discovered the group was arming itself and "planning to murder Jews, communists, and 'a dozen Congressmen'"[38] and eventually establish, in J. Edgar Hoover's words, "a dictatorship, similar to the Hitler dictatorship in Germany." Coughlin publicly stated, after the plot was discovered, that he still did not "disassociate himself from the movement," and though he was never linked directly to the plot, his reputation suffered a fatal decline.[39]

After the attack on Pearl Harbor and the declaration of war in December 1941, the anti-interventionist movement (such as the America First Committee) sputtered out, and isolationists like Coughlin were seen as being sympathetic to the enemy. In 1942, the new bishop of Detroit ordered Coughlin to stop his controversial political activities and confine himself to his duties as a parish priest.

William Dudley Pelley founded (1933) the antisemitic Silvershirt Legion of America; nine years later he was convicted of sedition. And Gerald Winrod, leader of Defenders of the Christian Faith, was eventually indicted for conspiracy to cause insubordination in the United States Armed Forces during World War II.

The avant-garde of the new non-interventionism was the America First Committee, which included the aviation hero Charles Lindbergh and many prominent Americans. The America First Committee opposed any involvement in the war in Europe.

Officially, America First avoided any appearance of antisemitism and voted to drop Henry Ford as a member for his overt antisemitism.

In a speech delivered on September 11, 1941, at an America First rally, Lindbergh claimed that three groups had been "pressing this country toward war": the Roosevelt Administration, the British, and the Jewsand complained about what he insisted was the Jews' "large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio and our government."[40]

In an expurgated portion of his published diaries Lindbergh wrote: "We must limit to a reasonable amount the Jewish influence. ... Whenever the Jewish percentage of total population becomes too high, a reaction seems to invariably occur. It is too bad because a few Jews of the right type are, I believe, an asset to any country."

The German American Bund held parades in New York City in the late 1930s which featured Nazi uniforms and flags featuring swastikas alongside American flags. Some 20,000 people heard Bund leader Fritz Julius Kuhn criticize President Franklin D. Roosevelt by repeatedly referring to him as "Frank D. Rosenfeld", calling his New Deal the "Jew Deal", and espousing his belief in the existence of a Bolshevik-Jewish conspiracy in America.

In the years before and during World War II the United States Congress, the Roosevelt Administration, and public opinion expressed concern about the fate of Jews in Europe but consistently refused to permit immigration of Jewish refugees.

In a report issued by the State Department, Undersecretary of State Stuart Eizenstat noted that the United States accepted only 21,000 refugees from Europe and did not significantly raise or even fill its restrictive quotas, accepting far fewer Jews per capita than many of the neutral European countries and fewer in absolute terms than Switzerland.[41]

According to David Wyman, "The United States and its Allies were willing to attempt almost nothing to save the Jews."[42] There is some debate as to whether U.S. policies were generally targeted against all immigrants or specifically against Jews in particular. Wyman characterized FDR advisor and State Department official in charge of immigration policy Breckinridge Long as a nativist, more anti-immigrant than just antisemitic.[43]

The SS St. Louis sailed out of Hamburg into the Atlantic Ocean in May 1939 carrying one non-Jewish and 936 (mainly German) Jewish refugees seeking asylum from Nazi persecution just before World War II. On 4 June 1939, having failed to obtain permission to disembark passengers in Cuba, the St. Louis was also refused permission to unload on orders of President Roosevelt as the ship waited in the Caribbean Sea between Florida and Cuba.[44][45]

During the Holocaust, antisemitism was a factor that limited American Jewish action during the war, and put American Jews in a difficult position. It is clear that antisemitism was a prevalent attitude in the US, which was especially convenient for America during the Holocaust. In America, antisemitism, which reached high levels in the late 1930s, continued to rise in the 1940s. During the years before Pearl Harbor, over a hundred antisemitic organizations were responsible for pumping hate propaganda to the American public. Furthermore, especially in New York City and Boston, young gangs vandalized Jewish cemeteries and synagogues, and attacks on Jewish youngsters were common. Swastikas and anti-Jewish slogans, as well as antisemitic literature, were spread. In 1944, a public opinion poll showed that a quarter of Americans still regarded Jews as a "menace." Antisemitism in the State Department played a large role in Washington's hesitant response to the plight of European Jews persecuted by Nazis.[46]

In a 1943 speech on the floor of Congress quoted in both The Jewish News of Detroit[47] and the antisemitic magazine The Defender of Wichita[48] Mississippi Representative John E. Rankin espoused a conspiracy of "alien-minded" Communist Jews arranging for white women to be raped by African American men:

When those communistic Jewsof whom the decent Jews are ashamedgo around here and hug and kiss these Negroes, dance with them, intermarry with them, and try to force their way into white restaurants, white hotels and white picture shows, they are not deceiving any red-blooded American, and, above all, they are not deceiving the men in our armed forcesas to who is at the bottom of all this race trouble.

The better element of the Jews, and especially the old line American Jews throughout the South and West, are not only ashamed of, but they are alarmed at, the activities of these communistic Jews who are stirring this trouble up.

They have caused the deaths of many good Negroes who never would have got into trouble if they had been left alone, as well as the deaths of many good white people, including many innocent, unprotected white girls, who have been raped and murdered by vicious Negroes, who have been encouraged by those alien-minded Communists to commit such crimes.

Josiah DuBois wrote the famous "Report to the Secretary on the Acquiescence of This Government in the Murder of the Jews," which Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau, Jr., used to convince President Franklin D. Roosevelt to establish the War Refugee Board in 1944.[49][50][51] Randolph Paul was also a principal sponsor of this report, the first contemporaneous Government paper attacking America's dormant complicity in the Holocaust.

Entitled "Report to the Secretary on the Acquiescence of This Government in the Murder of the Jews", the document was an indictment of the U.S. State Department's diplomatic, military, and immigration policies. Among other things, the Report narrated the State Department's inaction and in some instances active opposition to the release of funds for the Jews in Nazi-occupied Europe, and condemned immigration policies that closed American doors to Jewish refugees from countries then engaged in their systematic slaughter.

The catalyst for the Report was an incident involving 70,000 Romanian Jews whose evacuation from the Kingdom of Romania could have been procured with a $170,000 bribe. The Foreign Funds Control unit of the Treasury, which was within Paul's jurisdiction, authorized the payment of the funds, the release of which both the President and Secretary of State Cordell Hull supported. From mid-July 1943, when the proposal was made and Treasury approved, through December 1943, a combination of the State Department's bureaucracy and the British Ministry of Economic Warfare interposed various obstacles. The Report was the product of frustration over that event.

On January 16, 1944, Morgenthau and Paul personally delivered the paper to President Roosevelt, warning him that Congress would act if he did not. The result was Executive Order 9417,[52] creating the War Refugee Board composed of the Secretaries of State, Treasury and War. Issued on January 22, 1944, the Executive Order declared that "it is the policy of this Government to take all measures within its power to rescue the victims of enemy oppression who are in imminent danger of death and otherwise to afford such victims all possible relief and assistance consistent with the successful prosecution of the war."[53]

It has been estimated that 190,000200,000 Jews could have been saved during the Second World War had it not been for bureaucratic obstacles to immigration deliberately created by Breckinridge Long and others.[54]

Liberty Lobby was a political advocacy organization which was founded in 1955 by Willis Carto in 1955. Liberty Lobby was founded as a conservative political organization and was known to hold strongly antisemitic views and to be a devotee of the writings of Francis Parker Yockey, who was one of a handful of post-World War II writers who revered Adolf Hitler.

The Nixon White House tapes released during the Watergate scandal reveal that President Richard Nixon made numerous anti-Semitic remarks during his presidency.[55] For example he repeatedly referred to National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger as "Jew boy," and blamed the anti-Vietnam War movement and leaking of the Pentagon Papers on Jews.[55][56][57]

Antisemitic violence in this era includes the 1977 shootings at Brith Sholom Kneseth Israel synagogue in St. Louis, Missouri, the 1984 murder of Alan Berg, the 1985 Goldmark Murders, and the 1986 Murder of Neal Rosenblum.

Seeking a venue, In 1977 and 1978, members of the National Socialist Party of America (NSPA) chose Skokie. Because of the large number of Holocaust survivors in Skokie, it was believed that the march would be disruptive, and the village refused to allow it. They passed three new ordinances requiring damage deposits, banning marches in military uniforms and limiting the distribution of hate speech literature. The American Civil Liberties Union interceded on behalf of the NSPA in National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie seeking a parade permit and to invalidate the three new Skokie ordinances.

However, due to a subsequent lifting of the Marquette Park ban, the NSPA ultimately held their rally in Chicago on July 7, 1978, instead of in Skokie.[58]

In 1984, civil rights leader Jessie Jackson speaking to Washington Post reporter Milton Coleman referred to Jews as "Hymies" and New York City as "Hymietown." He later apologized.[59]

During the Crown Heights riot, marchers proceeded carrying antisemitic signs and an Israeli flag was burned.[60][61] Ultimately, black and Jewish leaders developed an outreach program between their communities to help calm and possibly improve racial relations in Crown Heights over the next decade.[62]

According to Anti-Defamation League surveys begun in 1964, African Americans are significantly more likely than white Americans to hold antisemitic beliefs, although there is a strong correlation between education level and the rejection of antisemitic stereotypes for all races. However, black Americans of all education levels are nevertheless significantly more likely than whites of the same education level to be antisemitic. In the 1998 survey, blacks (34%) were nearly four times as likely as whites (9%) to fall into the most antisemitic category (those agreeing with at least 6 of 11 statements that were potentially or clearly antisemitic). Among blacks with no college education, 43% fell into the most antisemitic group (vs. 18% for the general population), which fell to 27% among blacks with some college education, and 18% among blacks with a four-year college degree (vs. 5% for the general population).[63]

During the early 1980s, isolationists on the far right made overtures to anti-war activists on the left in the United States in an attempt to join forces and protest against government policies in areas where they shared concerns.[64] This was mainly in the area of civil liberties, opposition to United States military intervention overseas and opposition to US support for Israel.[65][66] As they interacted, some of the classic right-wing antisemitic scapegoating conspiracy theories began to seep into progressive circles,[65] including stories about how a "New World Order", also called the "Shadow Government" or "The Octopus",[64] was manipulating world governments. Antisemitic conspiracism was "peddled aggressively" by right-wing groups.[65] Some on the left adopted the rhetoric, which was made possible by their lack of knowledge about the history of fascism and its use of "scapegoating, reductionist and simplistic solutions, demagoguery, and a conspiracy theory of history."[65]

Towards the end of 1990, as the movement against the Gulf War began to build, a number of far-right and antisemitic groups sought out alliances with left-wing anti-war coalitions, who began to speak openly about a "Jewish lobby" that was encouraging the United States to invade Ba'athist Iraq. This idea evolved into conspiracy theories about a "Zionist-occupied government" (ZOG), which has been seen as equivalent to the early-20th century antisemitic hoax,The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.[64] The anti-war movement as a whole rejected these overtures by the political right.[65]

In the context of the first US-Iraq war, on September 15, 1990, Pat Buchanan appeared on The McLaughlin Group and said that "there are only two groups that are beating the drums for war in the Middle East the Israeli defense ministry and its 'amen corner' in the United States." He also said: "The Israelis want this war desperately because they want the United States to destroy the Iraqi war machine. They want us to finish them off. They don't care about our relations with the Arab world."[67]

Many in the Jewish community celebrated the vice-presidential candidacy of Senator Joseph Lieberman in the 2000 presidential election as marking a milestone in the decline of antisemitism in the United States.[citation needed]

In recent years some scholars have advanced the concept of New antisemitism, coming simultaneously from the left, the far right, and radical Islam, which tends to focus on opposition to the creation of a Jewish homeland in the State of Israel, and argue that the language of Anti-Zionism and criticism of Israel are used to attack the Jews more broadly. In this view, the proponents of the new concept believe that criticisms of Israel and anti-Zionism are often disproportionate in degree and unique in kind, and attribute this to antisemitism.[68]

A 2009 study entitled "Modern Anti-Semitism and Anti-Israeli Attitudes", published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology in 2009, tested new theoretical model of antisemitism among Americans in the Greater New York area with 3 experiments. The research team's theoretical model proposed that mortality salience (reminding people that they will someday die) increases antisemitism and that antisemitism is often expressed as anti-Israel attitudes. The first experiment showed that mortality salience led to higher levels of antisemitism and lower levels of support for Israel. The study's methodology was designed to tease out antisemitic attitudes that are concealed by polite people . The second experiment showed that mortality salience caused people to perceive Israel as very important, but did not cause them to perceive any other country this way. The third experiment showed that mortality salience led to a desire to punish Israel for human rights violations but not to a desire to punish Russia or India for identical human rights violations. According to the researchers, their results "suggest that Jews constitute a unique cultural threat to many people's worldviews, that anti-Semitism causes hostility to Israel, and that hostility to Israel may feed back to increase anti-Semitism." Furthermore, "those claiming that there is no connection between antisemitism and hostility toward Israel are wrong."[69]

In October 2014 the controversial opera The Death of Klinghoffer was staged in the Metropolitan Opera in New-York. The opera tells the story of the 1985 hijacking of the Achille Lauro cruise ship by Palestinian terrorists, and the killing of Jewish passenger Leon Klinghoffer. Some of the criticism opposed to the opera claimed it's partly antisemitic and glorifies the killers,[70] as American writer and feminist Phyllis Chesler, an opera aficionado, wrote:

The Death of Klinghoffer also demonizes Israelwhich is what anti-Semitism is partly about today. It incorporates lethal Islamic (and now universal) pseudo-histories about Israel and Jews. It beatifies terrorism, both musically and in the libretto.[71]

On April 3, 2006, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights announced its finding that incidents of antisemitism are a "serious problem" on college campuses throughout the United States.[72]

Stephen H. Norwood compares the Antisemitism in contemporary American University to the antisemitism in campuses during the Nazi era.[73] His article shows how the support in Anti-Zionist opinions encourages antisemitism inside American campus. Norwood describes in his article: "In 2002, Muslim student groups at San Francisco State University similarly invoked the medieval blood libel, distributing fliers showing a can with a picture of a dead baby beneath a large drop of blood and two Israeli flags, captioned: "Made in Israel. Palestinian Children Meat. Slaughtered According to Jewish Rites Under American License." On that campus a mob menaced Jewish students with taunts of "Hitler did not finish the job" and "Go back to Russia." The transfer between the criticism on Israel to pure antisemitism is significant.

During April 2014 there were at least 3 incidents of swastika drawings on Jewish property in University dormitories. At UCF for example, a Jewish student found 9 swastikas carved into walls of her apartment.[74]

On the beginning of September 2014 there were two cases of antisemitism in College campuses: two students from East Carolina University sprayed swastika on the apartment door of a Jewish student,[75] while on the same day, a Jewish student from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte was told "to go burn in an oven." The student had also told the media she is "hunted" because of her support in Israel: "I have been called a terrorist, baby killer, woman killer, [told that] I use blood to make matzah and other foods, Christ killer, occupier, and much more."[76]

In October 2014 fliers were handed out in the University of California in Santa Barbara that claimed "9/11 Was an Outside Job" with a large blue Star of David. The fliers contained links to several websites that accused Israel of the attack.[77] A few days later antisemitic graffiti was found on a Jewish fraternity house in Emory University in Atlanta.[78] Another graffiti incident occurred in Northeastern University, where swastikas drawn on flyers for a school event.[79]

A survey published in February 2015 by Trinity College and the Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law found out that 54 percent of the participants had been subject to or witnessing antisemitism on their campus. The survey included 1,157 self-identified Jewish students at 55 campuses nationwide. The most significant origin for antisemitism, according to the survey was "from an individual student" (29 percent). Other origins were: in clubs/ societies, in lecture/ class, in student union, etc. The findings of the research compared to a parallel study conducted in United kingdom, and the results were similar.[80]

In October 2015 it was reported that a few cars in the parking lot of the UC Davis were vandalized and scratched with antisemitic slurs and swastika sketches.[81] A few days later, antisemitic slurs were found on a chalkboard in a center of the campus at Towson University.[82]

Some Jewish organizations, Christian organizations, Muslim organizations, and academics consider the Nation of Islam to be antisemitic. Specifically, they claim that the Nation of Islam has engaged in revisionist and antisemitic interpretations of the Holocaust and exaggerates the role of Jews in the African slave trade.[83] The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) alleges that NOI Health Minister, Dr. Abdul Alim Muhammad, has accused Jewish doctors of injecting Blacks with the human immunodeficiency virus,[84] an allegation that Muhammad has denied.

The Nation of Islam claimed that Jews were responsible for slavery, economic exploitation of black labor, selling alcohol and drugs in their communities, and unfair domination of the economy.

Some members of the Black Nationalist Nation of Islam claimed that Jews were responsible for the exploitation of black labor, bringing alcohol and drugs into their communities, and unfair domination of the economy.

The Nation of Islam has repeatedly denied charges of antisemitism,[85] and NOI leader Minister Louis Farrakhan has stated, "The ADL ... uses the term 'anti-Semitism' to stifle all criticism of Zionism and the Zionist policies of the State of Israel and also to stifle all legitimate criticism of the errant behavior of some Jewish people toward the non-Jewish population of the earth."[86]

According to an Anti-Defamation League survey, 14 percent of U.S. residents had antisemitic views. The 2005 survey found "35 percent of foreign-born Hispanics" and "36 percent of African-Americans hold strong antisemitic beliefs, four times more than the 9 percent for whites".[87] The 2005 Anti-Defamation League survey includes data on Hispanic attitudes, with 29% being most antisemitic (vs. 9% for whites and 36% for blacks); being born in the United States helped alleviate this attitude: 35% of foreign-born Hispanics, but only 19% of those born in the US.[88]

Escalating hate crimes which targeted Jews and members of other minority groups prompted the passage of the federal Hate Crimes Statistics Act in 1990. On April 1, 2014, Frazier Glenn Miller, a former member of the Ku Klux Klan arrived at the Jewish center of Kansas City and murdered 3 people.[89] After his capture, the suspect was heard saying "Heil Hitler".[90]

In April 2014, the Anti-Defamation League published its 2013 audit of antisemitic incidents, the audit pointed out a decline of 19 percent in the number of reported antisemitic incidents. The total number of antisemitic attacks across the U.S. was 751, including 31 physical assaults, 315 incidents of vandalism and 405 cases of harassment.[91]

The Vassar Students for Justice in Palestine published a Nazi World War II propaganda poster in May 2014. The poster displays Jews as part of a monster who tries to destroy the world. Vassar College president Catharine Hill denounced the poster.[92] A few months later, a physical attack occurred in Philadelphia, when a Jewish student on the campus of Temple University was assaulted and punched in the face by a member of the organization Students for Justice in Palestine, who called him an antisemitic slur.[93]

In May 2014, a Jewish mother from Chicago accused a group of students at her eighth-grade son's school of bullying and antisemitism. They used the multi-player video game Clash of Clans to create a group called "Jews Incinerator" and described themselves by stating: "we are a friendly group of racists with one goal- put all Jews into an army camp until they are disposed of. Sieg! Heil!" Two students wrote apology letters.[94][95]

See the article here:

History of antisemitism in the United States - Wikipedia

Hungary and Poland provide model for Israels assault on judiciary …

Posted By on April 16, 2023

At the height of the protests in Israel over Benjamin Netanyahus planned judicial changes early last month, a Polish minister gave a revealing radio interview in Warsaw.

Of course, we are talking with Israel, and to some extent we shared our experiences in this regard, said the deputy foreign minister, Pawe Jaboski, when asked for his views on the proposed Israeli laws.

Im telling the honest truth. Israel was interested in what was happening in Poland, he added.

The next day, Jaboski quickly walked back the comments, saying there had been no consultations with the Israeli side over the changes after all. But they were quickly seized on as a sign of something significant nonetheless.

Netanyahus assault on the judiciary reminds many of the first steps taken by illiberal governments in Hungary, Poland and elsewhere. Legal experts say targeting the judiciary is the natural first step for modern would-be autocrats who want to dismantle the broader democratic framework.

If you want to conduct a modern coup detat you no longer need to employ serious force and to kill people, you dont need the army and blood in the streets. The first institution to destroy is the judiciary. Everything else can come afterwards, said Eli Salzberger, the director of the Minerva Center for the Rule of Law under Extreme Conditions at the University of Haifa.

When Viktor Orbn was elected prime minister in Hungary in 2010, he quickly enacted a constitutional amendment to change the nomination and election procedure for constitutional court judges, as well as changing the number of judges on the court from 11 to 15.

Orbn is still in power, and in the intervening years has moved to dismantle much of Hungarys free media and make numerous other changes with the result that last year a group of European parliament members declared the country is no longer a full democracy.

This playbook was written in Budapest back in 2010, and later used by the Poles, by [President] Sisi in Egypt and others, said Gbor Halmai of the European University Institute in Florence.

Halmai noted that Israel and Hungary have no second chamber of parliament and no strong president who can act as a check to the executive, which makes the highest courts even more important.

The anger in response to the proposed changes in Israel has been much more coordinated than it was in Hungary or Poland, however.

We were much more prepared than the Hungarian and Polish civil society. Israel had a flawed democracy but a democracy for 75 years, said Salzberger.

Unlike in Hungary and Poland, where with a few exceptions the ruling parties have been able to ensure broad loyalty in the ranks, the protests in Israel include a lot of former ruling party Likud appointees and others who might have once been seen as loyal.

There is also a sense that the examples of Hungary and Poland have served as a warning of where the country might be heading. Parts of the crowd at the protest were chanting: Israel is not Hungary, Israel is not Poland, according to one Polish television correspondent attending the demonstrations in Tel Aviv.

The people in Poland and Hungary who were saying some years ago that this will go much further and have an impact on fundamental rights were considered to be fearmongers who were not giving the benefit of the doubt to these governments, said Anna Wjcik, a Polish legal scholar.

Israelis already know what has happened in other backsliding democracies its such a big theme already, she added.

Hungary and Poland are both EU members and the bloc has struggled to formulate a strategy for how to deal with democratic backsliding in the countries. Israel has no such body to answer to, but has faced stern criticism from its main economic and military partner in Washington.

Netanyahu totally underestimated the American response, said Salzberger. It has led to many, including people from his own party, realising something is wrong with his ability to see three or four moves ahead.

Alarmed by the strength of protest feeling, Netanyahu has promised to pause for consultations and put the changes on hold. Observers said, however, that a frequent tactic in Hungary and Poland was to present something outlandish, then water it down and portray it as a compromise solution after the fuss had died down.

Maybe what the Polish and Hungarian experiences teach others is that its important to hold out. Weather the first protests, find a different way to propose something less scary, and mould it all so its very difficult even for experts in the field to follow because its so complicated, said Wjcik.

Read more:

Hungary and Poland provide model for Israels assault on judiciary ...

Thousands of Israelis in new protests against judicial reforms – Al Jazeera English

Posted By on April 16, 2023

  1. Thousands of Israelis in new protests against judicial reforms  Al Jazeera English
  2. Israeli Protests' Focus Moves to This Likud Stronghold With Battle Over Narrative - Israel News  Haaretz
  3. Protests show depth of mistrust in Israeli government, says Rothman  The Guardian

Here is the original post:

Thousands of Israelis in new protests against judicial reforms - Al Jazeera English

7 Ways to Celebrate Jewish American Heritage Month

Posted By on April 16, 2023

Jewish American Heritage Month (JAHM) is an annual recognition and celebration of American Jews' achievements and contributions to the United States of America. Held throughout May, it is an opportunity to recognize and celebrate the more than 350-year history of Jewish contributions to America and the American culture.

Jewish American Heritage Month encourages communities across the country to educate diverse public audiences about Jewish culture; and spark crucial conversations about the American Jewish past, present and future.

Visit a Jewish Museum

Were fortunate to live in an area that has so many wonderful museums telling the story of Jewish Americans. And even if you cant make it in person, many offer virtual tours or online resources.

Teach your children about Jewish history by visiting one of these museums either virtually or in person. Here are a few good options:

Jewish Museum of Maryland; Located in Baltimore, this museum is for connecting with Jewish life, history, culture, and art. The Tenement Museum; This is a museum located in New York that focuses on telling the story of the working class citizens who immigrated to the United States into tenement housing. Take a look at some of their online exhibits. Capital Jewish Museum; Local museum that will open in person June 2023. Current website includes some local Jewish history.

Explore Additional Resources for Jewish American Heritage Month including K-12 curriculumJewish American Heritage MonthThis is a compilation of resources from the US Holocaust Memorial Museum, Library of Congress, and other organizations to celebrate Jewish American History.

EDSITEmentEDSITEment provides educational resources on the history of the Jewish people in America.

The WeitzmanResources collected from different groups celebrating Jewish heritage focusing on culture, family history, government resources, and combatting Antisemitism.

The Jacob Rader Marcus Center of American Jewish ArchivesThis is an educational tool with many primary source documents you can read through about American Jewry.

Emory UniversityResources from the Woodruff Library

Jewish American Heritage Month Lesson PlansThis is good resource for teaching children about Jewish Heritage.

Anti-Defamation LeagueThe ADL provides resources for families and educators to talk about the Holocaust and Antisemitism.

Institute for Curriculum Services offers free professional development series for JAMH, see flyer below.

See the article here:

7 Ways to Celebrate Jewish American Heritage Month

Jewish American Heritage Month | Managing American Spaces

Posted By on April 16, 2023

RESOURCE TOOLKIT FOR AMERICAN SPACES

This Resource Toolkit is designed for programming at American Spaces to foster a greater awareness and understanding of the Jewish American community in the United States.

Jewish American Heritage Month is a month to celebrate the contributions Jewish Americans have made to America since they first arrived in New Amsterdam in 1654. Jewish American Heritage Month had its origins in 1980 when Congress passed Pub. L. 96-237, which authorized and requested the President to issue a proclamation designating a week in April or May as Jewish Heritage Week. President Carter issued this first proclamation, Presidential Proclamation 4752, in April 1980.

This May American Spaces can promote American values of inclusion and diversity by running programs on this diverse group of Americans.

Abrahamic Religions Because Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all recognize Abraham as their first prophet, they are considered Abrahamic religions.

Melting Pot A place where a variety of peoples, cultures, or individuals assimilate into a cohesive whole.

Yiddish Language used by Jewish people in Central and Eastern Europe before the Holocaust. It is mainly spoken in the United States, Israel, and Russia.

The Holocaust The genocide of European Jews during World War II. Nazi Germany and its collaborators systematically murdered some six million Jews.

Anti-Semitism Hostility to or prejudice against Jewish people.

Kanopy films are accessible through eLibraryUSA and can be screened at American Spaces through our agreement with eLibraryUSA. American Spaces can also screen these films online in closed forums.

RBG Ruth Bader Ginsburg (100 minutes, 2018)

This 100-minute documentary explores the life and work of former Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg. This film takes a look at the legacy and personal journey of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who was born into a first-generation American Jewish family.

Supergirl (80 minutes, 2016)

This film tells an uplifting story of an 11-year-old Orthodox Jewish weightlifter.

Nana: A Holocaust Survivor Fighting Intolerance (100 min, 2017)

Maryla Michalowski-Dyamant, a Polish Holocaust survivor, was forced to interpret for Josef Mengele, the Nazi Angel of Death. She dedicated her life after the war to speak publicly about her experiences.

Bombshell: The Hedy Lamarr Story (89 min, 2017)

Austrian Actress Hedy Lamarr became one of Hollywoods most famous stars in the 1940s. Behind her talent on camera, Hedy Lamarr was an inventor whose work created the basis for Bluetooth technology.

* Post will need to procure these films. The Office of American Spaces is not endorsing these movies as they may not be appropriate for all audiences. Coordinators should screen the films ahead of showing them. Heres a link with more information on showing movies at the American Spaces.

The views expressed in these links and resources do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. government.

Updated April 2023

By scottbj | 9 April, 2023 | Topics: Adult, Age Group, Americana, Audience, College and University, Commemoration, Emerging Voices, Established Opinion Leaders, High School, Information about the United States, Month, Pillars of American Spaces, Programming Type, Social, Strategic and Cultural Programs, Strategy, Toolkits, U.S. Culture | Tags: programming, toolkit

Read the original post:

Jewish American Heritage Month | Managing American Spaces

Anti-Defamation League’s Youth Congress encourages ‘courageous …

Posted By on April 14, 2023

BEN: HUNDREDS OF NEW ENGLAND STUDENTS AND EDUCATORS GATHERING IN BOSTON TODAY FOR THE ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUES 27TH ANNUAL YOUTH CONGRESS. ERIKA: NEWSCENTER 5S TODD KAZAKIEWICH HAS THE LATEST ON THE POWERFUL LEARNING EXPERIENCE. TOM: A FESTIVE ATMOSPHERE KICKS OFF THE ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUES 27TH ANNUAL YOUTH CONGRESS IN BOSTON, BUT THE THEME OF COURAGEOUS CONVERSATIONS IS AN INDICATION OF THE SERIOUS TOPICS ON THE AGENDA. BULLYING, CYBERBULLYING, HATE SPEECH, AND HATE CRIMES. >> MASSACHUSETTS RATES NUMBER 6 OF ALL THE 50 STATES IN THE NUMBER OF ANTISEMITIC INCIDENTS REPORTED IN 2022. IN TERMS OF HATE CRIMES, THE NUMBERS ARE GOING UP. TODD: ATTORNEY GENERAL ANDREA CAMPBELL GAVE THE KEYNOTE ADDRESS. >> MANY FOLKS DO NOT REPORT WHAT THEY ARE EXPERIENCING. ITS DIFFICULT TO HELP, ITS DIFFICULT TO SERVE YOU IF WE DONT KNOW WHATS GOING ON. SO, PLEASE, USE YOUR TEACHERS, USE OTHERS IN THIS ROOM TO SHARE WHAT MAY BE HAPPENING TO YOU THAT IS UNFORTUNATE SO THAT WE CAN HELP. >> ITS OK TO SHARE PERSONAL STORIES ABOUT, LIKE, WHAT YOUVE GONE THROUGH, BECAUSE IT HELPS OTHER PEOPLE GROW AND LEARN, SO I THINK THAT ITS IMPORTANT THAT WE ALL, LIKE, OPEN UP, AND ALSO STAND UP TO THINGS THAT WE SEE OR HEAR. TODD: THE YOUTH CONGRESS BRINGS TOGETHER ABOUT 800 STUDENTS FROM AROUND NEW ENGLAND, INCLUDING SHARON, WHICH IS ONE OF MANY COMMUNITIES THAT HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO ESCAPE THE PLAGUE OF HATE. >> WERE A GREAT SCHOOL, AND A GREAT STUDENT BODY, BUT THIS IS STILL HAPPENING, AND WE STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSING IT AND BRINGING IT TO THE KIDS AND HAVING KIDS TALK ABOUT, YOU KNOW, WHAT IT FEELS LIKE TO THEM AND HOW WE CAN TRY TO PREVENT IT

Anti-Defamation League's 27th annual Youth Congress kicks off in Boston

Updated: 6:02 PM EDT Apr 10, 2023

A festive atmosphere kicked off the Anti-Defamation League's 27th Annual Youth Congress in Boston, but the theme of Courageous Conversations is an indication of the serious topics on the agenda: bullying, cyberbullying, hate speech and hate crimes."Massachusetts rates number six of all the 50 states in the number of antisemitic incidents reported in 2022. In terms of hate crimes, the numbers are going up, said Peggy Shukur, the interim regional director of ADL New England.Attorney General Andrea Campbell gave the keynote address.Many folks do not report what they are experiencing. It's difficult to help, it's difficult to serve you if we don't know what's going on. So, please, use your teachers, use others in this room to share what may be happening to you that may be unfortunate so that we can help," said Campbell. "It's OK to share personal stories about, like, what you've gone through because it helps other people grow and learn, so I think that it's important that we all, like, open up, and also stand up to things that we see or hear," said Elsie Serrano, an eighth grader at Sharon Middle School.The congress brings together about 800 students from around New England, including Sharon Middle School, one of many schools that have not been able to escape the plague of hate."We're a great school and a great student body, but this is still happening, and we still need to be addressing it and bringing it to the kids and having kids talk about, you know, what it feels like to them and how we can try to prevent it," said Sharon Middle School sixth-grade teacher Ruthie Miller.

A festive atmosphere kicked off the Anti-Defamation League's 27th Annual Youth Congress in Boston, but the theme of Courageous Conversations is an indication of the serious topics on the agenda: bullying, cyberbullying, hate speech and hate crimes.

"Massachusetts rates number six of all the 50 states in the number of antisemitic incidents reported in 2022. In terms of hate crimes, the numbers are going up, said Peggy Shukur, the interim regional director of ADL New England.

Attorney General Andrea Campbell gave the keynote address.

Many folks do not report what they are experiencing. It's difficult to help, it's difficult to serve you if we don't know what's going on. So, please, use your teachers, use others in this room to share what may be happening to you that may be unfortunate so that we can help," said Campbell.

"It's OK to share personal stories about, like, what you've gone through because it helps other people grow and learn, so I think that it's important that we all, like, open up, and also stand up to things that we see or hear," said Elsie Serrano, an eighth grader at Sharon Middle School.

The congress brings together about 800 students from around New England, including Sharon Middle School, one of many schools that have not been able to escape the plague of hate.

"We're a great school and a great student body, but this is still happening, and we still need to be addressing it and bringing it to the kids and having kids talk about, you know, what it feels like to them and how we can try to prevent it," said Sharon Middle School sixth-grade teacher Ruthie Miller.

See the original post here:
Anti-Defamation League's Youth Congress encourages 'courageous ...

North Texas man sentenced to federal prison for threatening Anti …

Posted By on April 14, 2023

A Denton man has been sentenced to federal prison for threats he made to a Jewish organization, announced U.S. Attorney Brit Featherston of the Eastern District of Texas.

Anthony Joseph Hammer, 34, pleaded guilty on May 3, 2022, to interstate communication of a threat and was sentenced to two years in prison on Tuesday by U.S. District Judge Richard A. Schell.

According to information presented in court, on July 28, 2021, Hammer sent a threatening electronic message to the Anti-Defamation League, a Jewish civil rights organization based in New York, via the ADL websites contact page.

In his message, Hammer stated the following: Come and find me. Come after me. Come hunt me down. This is me. This is really me. All of my info. I will kill all of you Zionist pigs. 4th reich soon.

Threatening to harm others by using phones, computers or mail is a federal crime and taken very seriously, Featherston said in a news release. Hammer believed he could promote his malicious agenda by making threats to kill and to disrupt business activity. Thats why he is going to jail and being punished. Others who do the same will have the same fate.

An investigation by federal agents revealed that Hammer was already under investigation for threatening calls he made to the office of Tom Wolf, who was then governor of Pennsylvania, according to the release. Hammer made seven calls to Wolfs office. When staff members refused to put him through to the governor, Hammer repeatedly threatened to kill Wolf and his staff members, authorities said. This conduct was taken into consideration in calculating Hammers sentence in the Eastern District of Texas.

The FBI is tasked with upholding the Constitution to include the right to Free Speech as outlined in the First Amendment. In this case, the direct threats made by the defendant fell outside of that protected right, said FBI Dallas Special Agent in Charge Chad Yarborough. The FBI and our law enforcement partners take all threats seriously and will hold accountable anyone who seeks to intimidate and cause fear simply because they disagree with the views of their fellow citizens.

This case was investigated by the FBI and the Pennsylvania Capitol Police and prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Ryan Locker in the Eastern District of Texas in coordination with Assistant U.S. Attorney Carl Marchioli in the Middle District of Pennsylvania.

Read this article:
North Texas man sentenced to federal prison for threatening Anti ...

Denton man gets 2 years in prison for sending threats to the Anti …

Posted By on April 14, 2023

Your Tuesday Afternoon Headlines, April 11th, 2023

SHERMAN (CBSNewsTexas.com) A Denton man has been sentenced to two years in prison for threatening a Jewish organization, U.S. Attorney Brit Featherston announced.

Anthony Joseph Hammer, 34, was sentenced on April 11, 2023 after he pleaded guilty on May 3, 2022 to interstate communication of a threat.

According to information presented in court, Hammer sent a threatening electronic message to the Anti-Defamation League via its website's contact page on July 28, 2021. The Anti-Defamation League is a Jewish civil rights organization based in New York.

"Come and find me. Come after me. Come hunt me down. This is me. This is really me. All of my info. I will kill all of you Zionist pigs. 4th reich soon," the message read.

Hammer was already under investigation for threatening calls he made to Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf's office

Hammer reportedly made seven calls to Wolf's office requesting to speak to him. When staff members refused to put him through to the Governor, Hammer repeatedly threatened to kill Wolf and his staff members. This conduct was taken into consideration in calculating Hammer's appropriate sentence in the Eastern District of Texas.

"Threatening to harm others by using phones, computers or mail is a federal crime and taken very seriously," Featherston said. "Hammer believed he could promote his malicious agenda by making threats to kill and to disrupt business activity. That's why he is going to jail and being punished. Others who do the same will have the same fate."

Thanks for reading CBS NEWS.

Create your free account or log in for more features.

Go here to see the original:
Denton man gets 2 years in prison for sending threats to the Anti ...

Antisemitic incidents hit a record high in 2021. Whats behind … – PBS

Posted By on April 14, 2023

William Brangham:

Judy, the Anti-Defamation League, which tracks antisemitic behavior nationwide, found 2,717 incidents in 2021. That's a 34 percent increase from the year before. That averages to more than seven antisemitic incidents per day.

Jonathan Greenblatt is the CEO of the Anti-Defamation League and author of the recent book "It Could Happen Here: Why America Is Tipping from Hate to the Unthinkable and How We Can Stop It."

Jonathan Greenblatt, good to have you back on the "NewsHour."

This report documents the most antisemitic attacks in the U.S. since the ADL started recording these events back in the 1970s. Can you help us understand, how should we interpret what you have found?

Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO and National Director, Anti-Defamation League: Well, I think the data, unfortunately, speaks for itself in some ways.

As you pointed out, this is the highest total we have ever tracked in more than 40 years of doing this work. And we should keep in mind that antisemitic acts were going down in the United States for almost 15 years, and then ,in 2016, they started to move up. And we're now at the point where we have nearly triple the number of incidents today that we did in 2015.

I mean, in the past year alone, assaults increased 167 percent. And we saw examples of vandalism on the rise, harassment on the rise. So I think antisemitism really isn't just, I would suggest, a Jewish problem. It's an American problem. It's typically the canary in the coal mine. And so, as things are beginning to unravel more broadly, the Jewish community is often the target of scapegoating and victimized in that way.

And that's exactly what's happening here.

Read more:
Antisemitic incidents hit a record high in 2021. Whats behind ... - PBS


Page 149«..1020..148149150151..160170..»

matomo tracker