Page 1,633«..1020..1,6321,6331,6341,635..1,6401,650..»

History – The Leo Frank Case – GeorgiaInfo

Posted By on September 7, 2015

Biographical Notes

Leo Frank was born April 17, 1884 in Cuero, Texas to Rudolph and Rae Frank. Within a few months, the family moved to Brooklyn, where Leo grew up. He graduated from Cornell University in 1906, earning a degree in mechanical engineering. In December of 1907, Frank went to Europe for a nine-month apprenticeship in pencil manufacturing. In August of 1908 he moved to Atlanta to assume the supervision of the National Pencil Factory. Two years later, in November 1910, Frank married Lucille Selig of Atlanta. The couple lived with Lucilles parents. By the year 1913 the Jewish community in Atlanta was the largest in the South; Leo Frank was serving as president of the Atlanta chapter of Bnai Brith, while maintaining his position as supervisor of the National Pencil Factory. At the time of Mary Phagans murder, he was twenty-nine years old and had supervised the factory for almost five years.

Mary Phagan was born on June 1, 1899 to John and Frances Phagan in Marietta, Ga. Her father died when she was young; her mother eventually re-married to J.W. Coleman. They resided briefly in Alabama before moving back to Marietta. Mary Phagan was employed by the National Pencil Factory to operate a machine which placed metal tips on pencils. Mary had been temporarily laid off in April of 1913, because a shipment of metal to make the tips was late in arriving. She was due $1.20 in wages, which she went to collect on Confederate Memorial Day, April 26, 1913.

Chronology:

Murder, Investigation, Arrest, Indictment - April 26-May 25, 1913 Pre-Trial Reports - May 26-July 27, 1913 Trial, July 28-August 26, 1913 Appeals, Commutation, Lynching Pardon Printed Sources

Murder, Investigation, Arrest, Indictment

April 26, 1913 - Mary Phagan, an employee of the National Pencil Factory in Atlanta, was murdered sometime after picking up her wages from the factory.

April 27, 1913 - Arthur Mullinax, an ex-street car driver, and Newt Lee, the night watchman at the National Pencil Factory, were both arrested on suspicion of being implicated in the murder of Mary Phagan. Lee was African-American and was the man who discovered her body soaked with blood, with two scrawled notes lying nearby. Mullinax had frequently driven Phagan to and from work; he was arrested because a witness claimed to have seen the two together Saturday, with Phagan appearing to be dazed or drugged. Both men declared their innocence.

April 28, 1913 - two more men were arrested on suspicion of being involved with the murder of Mary Phagan. One was John Gantt, a former bookkeeper at the National Pencil Factory, who had openly admired Phagan. He was arrested in Marietta with a packed suitcase, waiting to board a train. The second man arrested was an unnamed African-American. The Atlanta Constitution published an appeal, along with a reward of $1000, for anyone who had seen Mary Phagan after noon on April 26 to come forward. Meanwhile police had to disperse a white mob threatening to lynch Newt Lee, the night watchman who had discovered Phagans body and was also under suspicion. In a side note to the investigation, the superintendent of the National Pencil Factory was questioned perfunctorily in the case, then expressed his unhappiness with the investigations progress, so he personally brought in a Pinkertons detective to aid in the investigation. This was the first mention of the superintendent, Leo Frank, in the information released to the public.

April 29, 1913 - Mary Phagan was buried; her mother was overcome with grief several times during the ceremonies. Most of the suspicion continued to fall on Newt Lee, though Leo Frank was brought in again for more detailed questioning. After his interrogation, Frank questioned Lee himself. A bloody shirt had been found in Lees home; he claimed it was his own blood from an injury. The reward for information leading to the conviction of the murderer was raised to $2200 - $1000 from the Atlanta Constitution, $1000 from the city of Atlanta, and $200 from the state. One of the detectives released the following statement: We have sufficient evidence to convict the murderers of Mary Phagan. More arrests will be made before daybreak. The mystery is cleared. No names were mentioned.

April 30, 1913 - at an inquest into the death of Mary Phagan, more suspicion began to fall on Leo Frank. George Epps, a fifteen year old friend of Mary Phagan, testified that Phagan was afraid of Frank because he had flirted with and made advances toward her. Newt Lee testified that Frank was nervous the day of the murder and had telephoned to see if everything was fine at the factory - not his usual practice. But two mechanics who had worked on the top floor of the factory that morning disputed Lees story, saying Frank had acted normally.

May 1, 1913 - Arthur Mullinax and John Gantt were released, no longer suspects in the murder of Mary Phagan. Newt Lee and Leo Frank were still being held. Although the local media did not know (or at least did not report) it, another employee of the National Pencil Factory was arrested around 2:00 the afternoon of May 1. Jim Conley, a sweeper at the factory, was discovered trying to rinse out a soiled shirt in the basement. Upon further examination, the stains turned out to be blood.

May 2, 1913 - In talks with an Atlanta Constitution reporter, both Newt Lee and Leo Frank strongly insisted they were innocent of Mary Phagans murder; Frank was confident his name would be cleared in the process of the investigation.

May 3, 1913 - Detectives investigating Mary Phagans murder had a new problem; two impostors posing as Pinkerton detectives had interviewed George Epps (Phagans friend who had reported she was afraid of Leo Frank) and Phagans mother.

May 5, 1913 - Lemmie Quinn, foreman of Mary Phagans work area at the National Pencil Factory, testified he saw Leo Frank the Saturday of the murder and that all was perfectly normal. Furthermore he knew Frank well and was certain that he was not guilty of the murder. But detectives accused him of accepting a bribe from Frank to make those statements, an accusation Quinn firmly denied. Meanwhile several witnesses had come forward to say they had seen a girl resembling Phagan at the Confederate Memorial Day parade that Saturday afternoon; she appeared to be drugged. So the decision was made to exhume Phagans body and search her stomach for signs of drugs.

May 6, 1913 - a second exhumation of Mary Phagans body took place, this time to look for fingerprints; a fingerprint expert had been called in to help with the case.

May 7, 1913 - the blood on Newt Lees shirt was determined to be not more than a month old. The wife of one of the mechanics who had testified on April 30 said she visited her husband at the factory that day and saw a strange Negro boarding the elevator as she left around 1:00 PM. Detectives on the case said someone was planting false evidence and trying to block the investigation.

May 8, 1913 - a coroners jury ordered Newt Lee and Leo Frank to be held under the charge of murder of Mary Phagan. Several women and girls had come forward to say Frank had made improper advances to them in the past. While detectives still expressed confidence in solving the case, they also admitted all the evidence they had up to that point was circumstantial.

May 9, 1913 - Fourteen year old Monteen Stover said she had arrived at the National Pencil Factory around 12:05 PM (roughly the same time as Mary Phagan had arrived) and that Leo Frank was not in his office. This contradicted Franks testimony that he had been in his office the entire time in which it was thought Phagan had been murdered. Another woman reported that she was walking outside the factory around 4:30 PM when she heard three piercing screams come from the basement of the building.

May 10, 1913 - the Atlanta Constitution reported that Robert House, an ex-policeman, had said he once caught Leo Frank and a young girl in the woods at Druid Hills Park engaging in immoral acts. According to House, Frank had pleaded with him not to report the incident. This story was later proven to be false.

May 11, 1913 - officials of the National Pencil Factory told Pinkerton detectives to find the murderer of Mary Phagan, no matter who it might be, this despite Leo Frank having brought in the Pinkerton detective in the first place. A mysterious girl in red was rumored to have said, in a Marietta grocery store, that she was with Phagan on the day of the murder. After scouring the neighborhood and not finding the girl, detectives concluded the story was a hoax.

May 12, 1913 - an Atlanta Constitution reporter in Brooklyn interviewed Mrs. Rudolph Frank, Leo Franks mother. She said My son is entirely innocent, but it is a terrible thing that even a shadow of suspicion should fall upon him. I am sure of his innocence and am confident that he will be proven not guilty of this terrible crime.

May 13, 1913 -detectives investigating the murder of Mary Phagan were reported to be on the verge of making a new arrest which would throw an entirely new light upon the case. Meanwhile rumors were swirling about the notes found near the body of Mary Phagan; samples of her handwriting had been collected and handwriting experts brought in.

May 14, 1913 - an identification slip had been found in Mary Phagans pocketbook. It read My name is Mary Phagan. I live at 146 Lindsey Street, near Bellwood and Asby Streets. Hugh Dorsey, the solicitor working the case, theorized that Phagan did this either because she had been threatened with violence previously or that she had a premonition of her death.

May 15, 1913 - the Atlanta Constitution began a fund raising drive to bring William J. Burns, Americas most famous and successful detective, into the Mary Phagan investigation. Burns was in Europe, but was rumored to interested in the case.

May 16, 1913 - investigators in the Mary Phagan murder case searched the National Pencil Factory looking for scraps of rope or twine. Hugh Dorsey, solicitor in the case, said the knot tied around Mary Phagans neck was intricate and inexplicable - it must have been tied by a professional. Over $1500 had already been raised to bring William J. Burns into the case; Thomas Felder, the attorney responsible for bringing in the Burns Agency, said: We will catch the guilty man and we wont be long about it. I am confident of success. Mary Phagans murder will be cleared in less than a month.

May 17, 1913 - rumors continued to abound that more arrests were imminent in the Mary Phagan murder case. Also, there were public breaches and conflicts forming between the detectives on the case and the solicitors staff. Atlantas police chief said he had documentary evidence which would convict Mary Phagans murderer, but refused to release it to the public.

May 18, 1913 - Thomas Felder claimed to have turned a new piece of evidence in the Mary Phagan case, but it was not revealed to the public. The Atlanta Constitution also reported that Atlanta police were questioning a new suspect in the case and had asked him for handwriting samples. The new suspect was James Connolly (sic), a sweeper at the factory, who had been arrested several days earlier (actually on May 1) when he was discovered rinsing a soiled shirt at the pencil factory. The stains on the shirt turned out to be blood. Jim Conley would turn out to be the prosecutions lead witness in its case against Leo Frank; Conley was also the man who had actually committed the murder, according to Alonzo Mann, a thirteen year old employee of the factory. Mann, in a story he did not tell until 1982, claimed he saw Conley carrying Phagans body at the factory that day; Conley threatened Mann with death if he ever was to report what he had seen. Manns mother advised him to keep quiet, which he did for almost seventy years.

May 19, 1913 - an investigator from the William J. Burns agency arrived in Atlanta to assist in the investigation of Mary Phagans murder. New rumors started up (as they did almost daily), this one that a telephone operator had heard two men discussing their involvement in the murder. Like most rumors surrounding this case, this one turned out to be false.

May 20, 1913 - P.A. Flak, a fingerprint expert from New York, visited the Mary Phagan crime scene with solicitor Hugh Dorsey. Later, Flak took fingerprints from both Newt Lee and Leo Frank. C.W. Toble, the investigator from the Burns Detective Agency, said he was convinced Newt Lee was innocent of the crime.

May 21, 1913 - Solicitor Hugh Dorsey announced that he would go before the grand jury on May 23rd and ask for indictments against both Newt Lee and Leo Frank, but that the evidence presented would concentrate on Frank.

May 22, 1913 - a new controversy arose in the Mary Phagan murder investigation. Phagans step father signed an affidavit accusing Thomas Felder, the attorney responsible for bringing the Burns Detective Agency into the case, of approaching him about allowing Felder to prosecute the case. Detectives presented transcripts of dictograph recordings in which Felder had offered them $1000 for access to the case evidence.

May 23, 1913 - a grand jury took only ten minutes to hand down a murder indictment against Leo Frank; no action was taken or requested against Newt Lee.

May 25, 1913 - details of Hugh Dorseys presentation to the grand jury in the Leo Frank case were beginning to emerge. No bill of indictment had been handed down against Newt Lee; all the evidence presented was aimed at Frank. Neither of the statements given by Frank or Lee were mentioned. Jim Conley had not been called to testify, nor had the notes found near Phagans body been presented. The undertaker who embalmed Phagans body said there was evidence of sexual assault, but the county physician said there was not sufficient evidence to make such a claim. Meanwhile, Newt Lees attorney requested that he be kept in custody, for fear the murderer of Mary Phagan would try to influence his testimony.

Pre-Trial Reports

May 26, 1913 - despite intense questioning by detectives, Jim Conley stuck to his story that he wrote the notes found near the body of Mary Phagan, but at the order of Leo Frank. There was little doubt that he did write the notes, but police continued to investigate the circumstances under which they were written.

May 27, 1913 - the detective from the Burns Agency, called in to help the investigation into Mary Phagans murder, withdrew from the case, citing continued fighting among the police, mayors office, solicitors office, and the attorney who had brought him into the case. On another note, Mrs. Arthur White, who had testified on May 7 that she saw a strange Negro lurking near the elevator of the National Pencil Factory around 1:00 PM after visiting her husband, identified the man she saw as Jim Conley.

May 28, 1913 - Samples of the handwriting of Leo Frank, Newt Lee, and Jim Conley were released, along with a portion of one of the notes found near Mary Phagans body. Jim Conley had admittedly written the notes, but on this day he changed his story dramatically. Previously he had claimed Frank asked him to write the notes on Friday, the day preceding the murder. Now he claimed he wrote them on Franks order after the murder. He added Frank had asked him to watch at the bottom of the stairs leading to Franks office, but he (Conley) had fallen asleep until he heard Frank whistle. When he went to Franks office Frank was shaking so badly he had to hold onto Conley for support. Then, according to Conley, Frank had asked him to write the notes and muttered the ominous phrase Why should I hang?

May 29, 1913 - officials of the National Pencil Factory claimed they believed Jim Conley was the true murderer of Mary Phagan. Atlanta detectives said they believed Conleys story, though admitting it had changed several times and still had many inconsistencies.

May 30, 1913 - police took Jim Conley to the National Pencil Factory, where he went over every detail of his story of the day of the murder, including how he and Leo Frank had together loaded Mary Phagans body onto the elevator and brought it to the basement. Though no one realized it at the time, there was a major flaw in Conleys story. He had told detectives he had defecated into the elevator shaft earlier that Saturday morning. But when police first investigating the murder took the elevator down the pile of feces left by Conley had been fresh, that is unmashed. If Conley and Frank had indeed taken the elevator down with Phagans body, the feces would already have been flattened. The police and Franks attorneys failed to notice this glaring mistake in Conleys testimony.

May 31, 1913 - Jim Conley was interviewed for two hours by solicitor Hugh Dorsey, preparing to prosecute Leo Frank for the murder of Mary Phagan. Conley was then returned to police headquarters where he would be readily available for further questioning; despite the police believing Frank was guilty of the murder, they were still concerned over the flaws and rough places in Conleys story.

June 2, 1913 - the Atlanta Journal reported that Leo Franks defense would insist the elevator in the National Pencil Factory was not moved on the day of the murder (April 26) and that the murder happened on the first floor, not the second as surmised by detectives; the blood found on the second floor likely came from workers who frequently cut themselves on the machinery there. Furthermore, the defense would argue that Jim Conley alone committed the murder. This was what actually happened, according to Alonzo Manns story told in 1982. There was evidence that the elevator had not been moved (see May 30 entry); though the police and defense attorneys apparently overlooked it. Meanwhile, Minola McKnight, the African-American cook for Leo Franks family, was brought in for questioning. At first she corroborated Franks story concerning the times he arrived home for lunch and then returned to the factory the day of the murder. She was agitated, believing her estranged husband had been telling lies to the police to get her in trouble. She said both she and Frank were innocent.

June 3, 1913 - Minola McKnight, after spending the night in jail and after intense questioning, signed a statement saying Leo Frank was very nervous and drinking heavily the night after the murder of Mary Phagan. She said she overheard Franks wife say he made her sleep on the rug and kept asking for his pistol so he could shoot himself. Frank had told her It is mighty bad, Minola. I might have to go to jail about this girl, and I dont know anything about it. Finally she said her wages had been raised as a tip to keep quiet.

June 4, 1913 - Leo Franks wife released a statement insisting her husband was innocent of the murder of Mary Phagan, and accused solicitor Hugh Dorsey of torturing witnesses to give false incriminating evidence against Frank. She said, in part, the action of the solicitor general in arresting and imprisoning our family cook because she would not voluntarily make a false statement against my innocent husband, brings a limit to patience.

June 5, 1913 - responding to the statement of Lucille Frank the previous day, solicitor Hugh Dorsey released his own statement denying any wrong doing in arresting and questioning witnesses in the Mary Phagan murder case.

June 7, 1913 - Lucille Frank renewed her charges that solicitor Hugh Dorsey was using third degree questioning tactics to gain false evidence against her husband in the murder of Mary Phagan. Frank said their cook, Minola McKnight, had been arrested illegally because she was not a suspect in any crime. The Atlanta Journal also reported that no indictment would be sought against Jim Conley until Franks trial was completed. If Frank was found guilty, then Conley might escape prosecution (he eventually received a one-year sentence); if Frank were acquitted, then first degree murder charges would be filed against Conley. Investigators on the case had discovered several cases of violence in Conleys background, including shooting at his wife and threatening a former employer with a gun.

June 9, 1913 - the Atlanta Journal reported that the prosecutions case against Leo Frank in the murder of Mary Phagan was complete and that no further questioning of Jim Conley was anticipated before the trial. But R.P. Barrett, a foreman at the National Pencil Factory, was quoted as saying he and practically all the factorys employees believed Conley was the guilty party.

June 10, 1913 - Luther Z. Rosser, Leo Franks defense attorney in the Mary Phagan murder case, publicly accused the police chief had banked his sense and reputation as both a man and politician on Franks guilt. He added that if the police had approached the investigation with an open mind, Jim Conley would have already told the whole truth.

June 11, 1913 - Solicitor Hugh Dorsey requested that Jim Conley be released from custody, but his petition was refused by Judge L.S Roan. Dorsey submitted the request because Roan had indicated that Conley should be moved to the Fulton County Jail (popularly known as The Tower) instead of being held at Atlanta police headquarters. At headquarters both Dorsey and detectives on the case had ready access to Conley, who had changed his story several times. At The Tower, access to Conley would be much more difficult.

June 13, 1913 - after a brief hearing Judge L.S. Roan released Jim Conley from custody. He was immediately re-arrested as a material witness to the Mary Phagan murder case and would be kept at Atlanta police headquarters, where detectives and solicitor Hugh Dorsey wanted him - so they could easily interview him whenever needed.

June 21, 1913 - Prominent Atlanta attorney Reuben Arnold announced that he had joined Leo Franks defense team. In his statement Arnold said he had reviewed all the evidence and was convinced of Franks innocence, adding that he would not agree to represent him otherwise. While Arnold did not directly accuse Jim Conley of the murder of Mary Phagan, he did say Conleys story had no credence in regards to Frank then added: I do not believe that any white man committed this crime.

June 22, 1913 - solicitor Hugh Dorsey announced that Leo Franks trial would begin June 30. The trial was later delayed until July 28.

June 24, 1913 - Georgia senator Hoke Smith denied rumors he had been approached about and was considering aiding in Leo Franks defense. The rumors spread after defense attorney Luther Rosser and National Pencil Company president Ike Haas stopped in Washington, D.C. en route to New York.

June 28, 1913 - John M. Slaton was inaugurated as governor of Georgia.

July 18, 1913 - Amidst persistent rumors that the Pinkerton detectives involved in the Mary Phagan murder case had changed their minds and now believed Jim Conley was the guilty party, a grand jury meeting was called to consider indicting Conley. Harry Scott, the Pinkerton detective heading the investigation for his firm, was denied access to interview Conley. Hugh Dorsey, the solicitor general prosecuting the case against Leo Frank, spoke out strongly against indicting Conley.

July 19, 1913 - Leo Franks attorneys publicly condemned Hugh Dorsey for his stand against indicting Jim Conley for the murder of Mary Phagan.

July 21, 1913 - a grand jury postponed indicting Jim Conley for the murder of Mary Phagan - at least until Leo Franks trial was completed. This decision was reached after a one and one-half hour presentation before the grand jury by prosecutor Hugh Dorsey. Judge L.S. Roan, set to hear the case, said he would consider postponing the trial if the weather remained so hot; the temperature had reached 99 degrees the previous day.

July 23, 1913 - Jim Conley and Newt Lee were brought together by Hugh Dorsey and staff to go over their testimonies for the Leo Frank trial, set to begin July 28.

July 24, 1913 - a group of 144 men were selected, from which the jury in the Leo Frank trial would be drawn.

July 26, 1913 - both groups of attorneys were making their final preparations for the trial of Leo Frank, set to begin July 28. Other attorneys questioned agreed this would be the greatest legal battle of Southern history.

July 27, 1913 - Judge L.S. Roan, would had been ill the previous week, announced he was fine and would call the Leo Frank trial beginning at 9:00 the following morning.

Trial

July 28, 1913 - the trial of Leo Frank began. A jury was quickly selected and seated. The first witness called was Mrs. J.W. Coleman, mother of Mary Phagan. She managed to stay collected during most of her testimony, but finally broke down in tears when asked to identify the clothes her daughter had worn on the day she was murdered. Next on the stand was George Epps, a thirteen year old boy who also worked at the National Pencil Factory. He had ridden the streetcar with Phagan the morning of April 26th, and the two had agreed to meet for an ice cream and to watch the Confederate Memorial Day parade at 1:00 that afternoon. When Mary didnt show, Epps went to a baseball game. The final witness on this day was Newt Lee, the night watchman who discovered Mary Phagans body and telephoned police. He testified for over two hours, telling the same story he had told police, that he noticed the body when he went into the basement to the restroom. He also told of Leo Frank being nervous because of the presence of John Gantt, who had been recently dismissed from the factory. That night, Frank called Lee to ask if everything was alright, an unusual practice for him.

July 29, 1913 - this was the second day of the trial of Leo Frank. Newt Lee, the night watchman who discovered Mary Phagans body, concluded his testimony by repeating his story for the defense. Altogether Lee spent four hours and forty-five minutes on the stand. The next witness was police Sgt. L.S. Dobbs, who took Lees phone call and rushed to the factory. He said he found the body in the basement, face down, with a cord tied tightly around the neck, and a pair of womens underpants tied loosely around the neck. The back of the head was covered in blood. He also found two notes, her shoes, and a trail where the body was dragged to its location. Detective John Starnes then took the stand. He had called Leo Frank to inform him of the murder, and said Frank appeared extremely nervous when he arrived at the factory. The highlight of the day was strong verbal clashes between solicitor Hugh Dorsey (prosecuting the case) and defense attorney Luther Rosser over Rossers attempts to discredit the testimony of Starnes.

July 30, 1913 - this was the third day of the Leo Frank trial, and a good day for the defense. Detective John Black, who had obtained most of the evidence against Leo Frank, seemed confused and openly admitted being mixed-up over portions of his testimony. He contradicted himself numerous times and said he could not remember significant details of the case. Finally, he even admitted that he couldnt be sure of what he had testified to previously. The defense was jubilant after his testimony. Others testified on this day as well; W.W. (Boots) Rogers testified that Leo Frank never saw Mary Phagans body at the undertakers; Frank had said he did. Grace Hicks, another factory employee, recalled how she was called to identify the body. She also said she had worked at the factory for five years and had only spoken to Leo Frank three times. Finally John Gantt, whom Frank had discharged from the factory for a shortage in a pay envelope, testified that he simply returned to the factory April 26th to retrieve a pair of shoes he had left there. The first three days of the trial were noted for standing room only crowds, with many gathered outside to hear news, as well as sweltering heat, with temperatures in the upper 90s. The temperature remained extremely hot throughout the trial.

July 31, 1913 - this was the fourth day in the trial of Leo Frank. R.B. Barrett, a machinist at the factory, provided new information when he said he had found Mary Phagans empty pay envelope and bloodstains near a machine on the factorys second floor. Heretofore, no mention had been made of the missing pay envelope. The main witness of the day was Harry Scott, Pinkerton detective in charge of their investigation of the case. He angered both sides during his testimony. He said Frank did not appear nervous on the Monday following the murder (it was Frank who brought Scott into the case), but was uneasy after his arrest. This angered solicitor Hugh Dorsey, who argued that Scott had told him previously Frank was nervous at the factory on Monday. Scott then angered defense attorneys when he asserted one of them had asked him to forward all police evidence to the defense. Also testifying was former factory employee Monteen Stover, who said she had arrived at the factory at 12:05 PM to receive her pay, had waited in Franks office for him for five minutes, then left. This contradicted Franks statement that he had been in his office the entire time in which the murder took place.

August 1, 1913 - this was the fifth day of the trial of Leo Frank. Dr. Roy Harris, secretary of the State Board of Health who had examined Mary Phagans body, said she had died within an hour of eating her last meal of cabbage and bread, meaning she died sometime in the hour between twelve and one oclock. He also said the head wounds were caused by a human fist. After suffering a fainting spell, Dr. Harris had to leave the stand before completing his testimony. Assistant factory superintendent N.V. Darley said Frank was nervous the day of the murder, but that this wasnt unusual for him (Frank). Darley said he had seen Frank talking to Gantt and assumed this accounted for his nervousness. Darleys testimony was marked by more bitter clashes between prosecutor Dorsey and defense attorney Rosser. Maggie White, wife of one of the machinists working at the factory April 26th, testified she went to the factory twice that day to visit her husband. She had seen Leo Frank both times, the second time around 12:30 in his office. He had his back turned to her and was startled when she walked in, but then told her it was fine to go see her husband. She left shortly before 1:00 and saw a Negro hiding behind some boxes on the first floor.

August 2, 1913 - this was the sixth day of the trial of Leo Frank, and it almost ended in a mistrial on this day. Judge L.S. Roan inadvertently help up a newspaper with lurid headline printed in red where the jury could see it. Defense attorneys objected immediately and discussed calling for a mistrial, but agreed to continue after Judge Roan instructed the jury to disregard anything they may had seen in the newspaper. A few minor witnesses were then called. Dr. J.W. Hurt, county physician who had also examined Mary Phagans body, said there was some evidence suggesting she may have been outraged (sexually assaulted), but there was not enough evidence to conclude this. Another factory employee and friend of Mary Phagan, Helen Ferguson, testified she had gone to the factory Friday night to get Marys pay envelope, but Leo Frank had told her Mary would pick it up herself on Saturday.

August 3, 913 - this was a Sunday and a break in the trial of Leo Frank. Frank was visited by numerous friends and relatives in prison. Prison officials said Frank was showing little evidence of stress from the trial.

August 4, 1913 - this was the seventh, and pivotal, day in the trial of Leo Frank. Jim Conley, a sweeper at the factory, was called to testify and presented a gruesome, graphic, and sometimes revolting tale. In fact his testimony was so lurid that Judge Roan ordered all women and children cleared from the courtroom. Conley testified he had watched out for Frank on several occasions, while he entertained young women in his office. Some of his descriptions of what he saw intimated that Frank was a sexual deviant. On the morning of April 26th, Conley said Frank had asked him to watch out for him while he chatted with Mary Phagan. Later, Frank had whistled for Conley to come to his office. Frank was so nervous he had to lean on Conley for support. He then supposedly told Conley that Phagan had refused him and he had struck her and left her in the machine room. When Conley was sent to get her, he said he found her lying on the floor, dead, with arms outstretched. Conley said Frank told him to wrap up the body and put it in the basement. Conley tried to do so, but said he could not lift the body. So Frank had helped him get it on the elevator, which they then took to the basement, where Conley dragged the body into a corner. They then returned to Franks office, where Frank indicated there would be money waiting for Conley if he kept his mouth shut. Here Conley said Frank uttered the ominous phrase Why should I hang? Frank then had Conley write the notes found near the body, apparently in an attempt to incriminate Newt Lee. Upon severe cross examination, Conley admitted he had lied to the police about this case previously; he had given several different stories after his May 1 arrest when he was seen washing out a bloody shirt in the factory. Conley also admitted he had been arrested numerous times. The defense was able to confuse Conley on some details of his story, but he held to the main points.

August 5, 1913 - this was the eighth day of the trial of Leo Frank. Jim Conley was cross-examined mercilessly by Franks defense attorneys for seven hours. While Conley was confused on some minor details, and admitted lying to police originally, and to having been arrested numerous times, he still held to his story of the previous day. Defense attorney Luther Rosser was unable to break any of the main points of Conleys story. When the day ended Conley was still on the stand, while defense attorneys argued that his testimony of having been a lookout for Frank on earlier occasions should be stricken from the record as irrelevant to the case.

August 6, 1913 - this was the ninth day of the trial of Leo Frank. Judge L.S. Roan ruled that testimony that Jim Conley had acted as a lookout for Leo Frank was admissible. Applause broke out in the courtroom; Franks attorneys immediately contended that any further such actions would be cause for a mistrial; Judge Roan threatened to clear the courtroom if order was not maintained. Luther Rosser again questioned Jim Conley, again failing to break his story. Conley spent 16 hours total on the witness stand. Dr. Roy Harris, secretary of the State Board of Health who had had his testimony interrupted by illness, resumed his testimony. He insisted Mary Phagan was killed shortly after eating her last meal of cabbage and bread, and that she had died from strangulation, not from the blows to her head.

August 7, 1913 - the tenth day of the Leo Frank trial. C.B. Dalton, a railroad carpenter, testified he had met with several women in the basement of the National Pencil Factory while Jim Conley watched out for him, and that he had seen numerous women come to the factory to visit Frank. After stating that the financial records of the National Pencil Factory showed there were two-hundred dollars (the amount Jim Conley said Frank had showed him) on the premises the day of the murder, solicitor Hugh Dorsey rested the states case. The defense called Dr. Roy Childs, who disputed the testimony of Dr. Roy Harris - saying cabbage was a very slow food to digest, implying that the murder could have been committed hours after Phagan had eaten. Pinkerton detective Harry Scott was recalled to the stand to testify on how Jim Conley had lied several times to investigators during the course of the murder investigation.

August 8, 1913 - the eleventh day in the Leo Frank trial. The defense had civil engineer T. H. Willett draw a diagram of the National Pencil Factory, showing how the murder could have been committed on the first floor without the knowledge of anyone (including Leo Frank) working on the second floor. Daisy Hopkins, one of the women C.B. Dalton had claimed he met for immoral purposes at the factory, denied having ever met Dalton or Leo Frank. Two street car conductors testified Mary Phagan had ridden alone the morning of her murder, contradicting the testimony of George Epps. Assistant factory manager N.V. Darley said he believed Conley and Dalton were lying about trysts in the basement; he worked most Saturdays and would have known of such actions. Factory timekeeper E.F. Holloway said he worked every Saturday and had never seen Conley and Frank interact, and that he had never seen a woman other than Franks wife in his office.

August 9, 1913 - the twelfth day in the Leo Frank trial. Herbert Schiff, personal assistant to Leo Frank, said he worked most Saturdays and had never seen any women in Franks office except his wife. He added that he had never seen C.B. Dalton either. He firmly believed he would have seen more if the story Jim Conley told were true. Schiff then identified a financial expenditure sheet on which Frank had been working the day of the murder, asserting it would take two-three hours to complete, leaving no time for the murder and movement of the body as described by Conley. He then testified Conley had been extremely nervous the Monday following the murder, and had said he would give a million dollars if he had a white mans skin.

August 11, 1913 - the thirteenth day in the trial of Leo Frank. The defense called several medical experts to contradict the testimony of Dr. Roy Harris, secretary of the State Board of Health who had examined Mary Phagans corpse. The defense witnesses said Harris was merely guessing at the time of death and that Phagan had been sexually violated; there was insufficient evidence to substantiate either claim. Herbert Schiff, an assistant to Frank, again asserted that the financial work done by Frank on the day of the murder was time consuming; it could have easily taken 3 1/2 hours to complete. Schiff also testified that Jim Conley was a very unreliable worker and other employees had complained about him numerous times.

August 12, 1913 - the fourteenth day in the trial of Leo Frank. The defense called twenty-two character witnesses to the stand, including Franks in-laws. They all testified that he was a man of good character and was very busy the day of the murder, showing no nervousness. When solicitor Hugh Dorsey asked one of the witnesses, a boy who worked for Frank, if Frank had ever made improper advances to him, a bitter argument ensued between the opposing attorneys. Another female employee of the factory, Magnolia Kennedy, contradicted the earlier testimony of Helen Ferguson - who had claimed she tried to pick up Mary Phagans pay on Friday (the day before the murder), but that Frank had told her Mary would pick it up herself on the next day. Kennedy claimed she was behind Ferguson in the line to receive her pay, and that Ferguson had neither asked about Phagans pay or talked to Frank. Other witnesses testified to the shady character of C.B. Dalton, who had claimed to have used the basement of the factory as a meeting place with women and of using Jim Conley as a lookout.

Lost among all this controversy was the brief testimony of one of the office boys who worked for Leo Frank. He was obviously nervous and timid the few minutes he was on the stand; saying only that he worked most Saturdays, including the day of the murder, and had never seen strange women in Franks office and had never seen Dalton at all. But this inconspicuous boy, Alonzo Mann, carried a terrible secret; one he would hold for the next sixty-nine years. It was not until 1982, when he was on the verge of death, that he unburdened his soul and told what he had seen that fateful day. He had seen Jim Conley carrying the body of Mary Phagan over his shoulder, near the elevator shaft on the first floor of the factory (Conley had testified that he could not lift the body). Conley had threatened Mann with death if he ever repeated what he had seen. Mann had gone home and told his mother, who advised him to keep quiet. So the trial went on, with no one realizing this shy, timid, scared boy had carried the truth of the case both to and away from the witness chair.

August 13, 1913 - the fifteenth day in the trial of Leo Frank. Another medical witness was called by the defense. Dr. William Kendrick, head of the Atlanta Medical School, said that Dr. Roy Harriss conclusions on the time of Phagans death were mere guesswork. Another witness testified to having worked the previous Thanksgiving with Frank, and that nothing unusual had happened. Jim Conley had claimed he watched while Frank entertained a woman in his office that day. More character witnesses were called during the afternoon. In cross-examining one of these witnesses, Hugh Dorsey asked if he had ever heard complaints about Frank fondling young girls. At this point Mrs. Rae Frank, Leo Franks mother, leapt to her feet and shouted at Dorsey No, nor you either, you dog. One of the defense attorneys escorted Mrs. Frank out of the courtroom.

August 14, 1913 - the sixteenth day in the trial of Leo Frank. After an angry outburst by Franks mother the previous day, solicitor Hugh Dorsey requested that she and Franks wife be removed from the courtroom for the duration of the trial. Judge L.S. Roan turned down this request, but did warn the women not to interrupt the proceedings again. Many more character witnesses testified, some having traveled all the way from New York for that purpose. Franks mother-in-law (with whom the Franks lived) testified Frank acted normally the night after murder, even engaging in a friendly game of cards. This contradicted earlier testimony that Frank had been nervous, drunk, and suicidal the night following the murder. Finally, Rachel Carson, a female employee of the factory, said she had talked to Jim Conley the Monday following the murder. Conley told her he was so drunk on Saturday that he didnt remember anything he did, but that he was sure Leo Frank was innocent. When Carson told Conley someone had reported seeing a black man lurking behind some boxes on the first floor soon after the time of the murder, Conley was so startled he dropped his broom.

August 15, 1913 - the seventeenth day in the trial of Leo Frank. Many more character witnesses were called by the defense, culminating in the testimony of Leo Franks mother. Having already expressed her complete confidence in Franks innocence, she identified a letter written by Frank to an uncle in New York the afternoon of April 26th, soon after the murder was committed. The letter was written in a precise, neat hand, dealing with various family matters. It did not, the defense claimed, show any signs of a nervous, guilt-ridden man. After the days proceedings, the defense said they were prepared to call every female employee of Frank, if necessary, to prove he did nothing improper with them at the factory.

August 16, 1913 - the eighteenth day in the trial of Leo Frank. Many more female employees of the National Pencil Factory were called, all testifying to Franks good character and that he had never done anything improper to them. One did say he opened the door to the girls dressing room once, but the defense claimed this was because some girls were flirting out the window and he wanted to stop it. Residents of the area where the Franks lived testified that he had walked around the neighborhood the evening after the murder, and seemed calm and normal. Finally, the defense announced what most of the crowd had been waiting to hear; Leo Frank himself would take the stand on Monday (this was a Saturday).

August 18, 1913 - the nineteenth day in the trial of Leo Frank. After another group of character witnesses in the morning, Leo Frank took the witness stand. He spoke for four hours, calmly but firmly laying out his story. Frank said Jim Conleys tale was all lies, and that the detectives tried to distort everything he (Frank) said in order to incriminate him. He freely admitted to being nervous after hearing of the murder, claiming any man in his position would be nervous, and justifiably so, especially after seeing the body of Mary Phagan. He said Mary came in for her pay soon after 12:00 noon on April 26th, returned a few minutes later to ask if the shipment of metal had arrived (Phagans job was putting metal tips on pencils), then left his office and he never saw her alive again. He worked on a financial report that afternoon, then went home. He never saw Jim Conley that day. Frank concluded his statement thus: Some newspaper man has called me the silent man in the Tower. (for his unwillingness to talk to police or the press) Gentlemen, this is the time and here is the place! I have told you the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

August 19, 1913 - the twentieth day in the trial of Leo Frank. This day was rather anti-climatic after Leo Franks statement the previous day. The defense continued its parade of character witnesses; solicitor Hugh Dorsey did get one of them to admit he had once seen Mary Phagan talking with Leo Frank, and that Phagan seemed to be backing away. There was another bitter disagreement between the opposing attorneys over the defense teams attempts to discredit the statement of Minola McKnight. McKnight was the housekeeper for the Selig family (Franks in-laws with whom he and his wife lived) who had signed a statement saying Leo Frank was intoxicated and talked of suicide the night after Phagans murder. Though McKnight later repudiated the statement, which had been signed after she spent a night in jail and undergoing hours of intensive questioning, Dorsey still introduced it as evidence, leading to yet another vehement argument between the opposing sides.

August 20, 1913 - the twenty-first day in the trial of Leo Frank. The evidence phase ended on this day, as the defense rested its case. Solicitor Hugh Dorsey then called several female ex-employees of the National Pencil Factory to the stand. They all testified that they had a bad opinion of Leo Franks character, but could not give concrete examples of immoral behavior on his part. After their testimony, Leo Frank again was called, by the defense, to repudiate their statements. Shortly after 4:00, the evidence phase of the case was closed, with final arguments set to begin the next day.

August 21, 1913 - the twenty-second day in the trial of Leo Frank. Final arguments began this day, with aides to the two main attorneys (Hugh Dorsey for the prosecution and Luther Rosser for the defense) beginning. Leo Frank was portrayed as a Jekyll and Hyde character who could mask his deviant tendencies from his family and friends. The defense contended that Jim Conley was the murderer and concocted his story to save his own neck.

August 22, 1913 - the twenty-third day in the trial of Leo Frank. Solicitor Hugh Dorsey took up the argument on this day, blistering the character of Leo Frank and portraying Mary Phagan as a symbol of lost innocence and virtue. He tried to deflect charges of anti-Semitism by recalling the great names in Jewish history, arguing that Frank with his deviant behavior dishonored them as well as the Southern girl he had so brutally murdered. Although Judge L.S. Roan kept strict control of the courtroom, Dorseys words were quickly relayed to the large crowd waiting outside. When Dorsey emerged he was greeted with thunderous applause.

August 23, 1913 - the twenty-fourth day in the trial of Leo Frank. Solicitor Hugh Dorsey continued his eloquent, yet ferocious, final argument, scoring Leo Frank for his abhorrent behavior and contending that he could not care less what opposing attorneys or Franks family thought of him; his duty was to Mary Phagan and the people of Georgia.

August 25, 1913 - the twenty-fifth, and final, day in the trial of Leo Frank. Solicitor Hugh Dorsey ended his final argument, which took parts of three days. The defense then argued that Frank was the latest in a long line of Jews who were persecuted for their religious beliefs, and again asserted that Jim Conley was the true murderer. Conley, and many other prosecution witnesses, had shady characters, while Leo Frank had been a pillar of the community who had many well respected people, plus many of his employees, testifying on his behalf. If the case came down to Leo Franks word against Jim Conleys, then it was obvious who should be believed. After hearing their instructions from Judge L.S. Roan, the jury retired to ponder the verdict. At 4:55 they returned with their decision; Leo Frank was declared guilty. Neither Frank nor his family or lead attorneys were present in the courtroom when the verdict was announced. Reportedly Judge Roan feared mob violence should Frank have been acquitted. When told of the verdict, Frank re-asserted his complete innocence, saying the jury had been influenced by mob law.

August 26, 1913 - Judge L.S. Roan sentenced Leo Frank to hang for the murder of Mary Phagan. The execution date was set for October 10, but Franks attorneys immediately motioned for a new trial. The hearing on this motion was set for October 4, thus assuring that there would be a delay in carrying out Franks sentence.

Appeals, Commutation, Lynching

October 31, 1913 - Judge L.S. Roan denied a motion for a new trial for Leo Frank. His execution date was re-scheduled for April 17, 1914.

February 17, 1914 - the Georgia Supreme Court denied a motion for a new trial.

February 24, 1914 - Jim Conley was sentenced to a year on a chain gang for his role in Mary Phagans murder.

April 6, 1914 - just eleven days before Leo Frank was scheduled to hang, his attorneys filed a motion to set aside the guilty verdict in the Fulton County Superior Court. The execution was re-scheduled for January 22, 1915.

June 6, 1914 - the Fulton County Superior Court denied the motion to set aside the verdict. Leo Franks attorneys immediately appealed to the Georgia Supreme Court.

Original post:
History - The Leo Frank Case - GeorgiaInfo

The Murder of Mary Phagan and the Lynching of Leo Frank

Posted By on September 7, 2015

EDITORS NOTE: On the 100th anniversary of its original publication, we are proud to present this, Tom Watsons hard-hitting article on the Leo Frank case. The audio version was recorded by Vanessa Neubauer. http://nationalvanguard.org/audio/A%20Full%20Review%20of%20the%20Leo%20Frank%20Case%20Full-A.mp3 by Thomas E. Watson, Watsons Magazine, Volume 20 Number 5, March 1915 ON THE 23rd page of Puck, for the week ending January 16, 1915, there is, in the smallest possible type, in the smallest possible space, at the bottom of the page, the notice of ownership, required by law. Mankind are informed that Puck is published by a corporation of the same name, Nathan Strauss, Jr., being President, and H. Grant Strauss being Secretary and Treasurer. You are...

ON SATURDAY morning at 11:30AM, April 26, 1913 Mary Phagan ate a poor girls lunch of bread and boiled cabbage and said goodbye to her mother for the last time. Dressed for parade-watching (for this was Confederate Memorial Day) in a lavender dress, ribbon-bedecked hat, and parasol, she left her home in hardscrabble working-class Bellwood at 11:45, and caught the streetcar for downtown Atlanta. Before the festivities, though, she stopped to see Superintendent Leo M. Frank at the National Pencil Company and pick up from him her $1.20 pay for the one day she had worked there during the previous week. She had been laid off for most of that week because the material needed for the tipping department in the metal room, where she worked, had been late in arriving. She...

GEORGIA, as a part of the South, is a place where, though freethinkers are certainly not unknown, the vast majority of the population is deeply committed to Christianity largely Protestant, fundamentalist Christianity. Ones personal walk with Jesus is taken very seriously here, and the religion informs almost every aspect of private, family, and public life. The fundamentalist worldview is dominant, as it is throughout the South, which, along with a few border states, is not called the Bible Belt for nothing. This was doubly true in 1913. One of the core beliefs of fundamentalism is literalism, a belief that every word of the scriptures was directly inspired by God and is literally true. The position of the average Georgian on the Bible is...

IT MAY WELL BE the greatest murder mystery of all time. Some assert that the Mary Phagan murder case is solved, but those who so assert are of two different and mutually exclusive camps. And those two camps still stand diametrically opposed to this day, four generations later. The case aroused the outrage and ire and vengeance of two great communities. One, the Jewish community, feel overwhelmingly today, and felt to a lesser but still substantial extent in 1913, that Leo Frank was tried and condemned simply because he was a Jew. They believe that Leo Frank is so obviously innocent that he never would have been tried had it not been for endemic anti-Semitism in 1913 Atlanta. And they have been remarkably effective in making Southern anti-Semitism the leitmotif...

Download: Argument of Hugh M. Dorsey at the Trial of Leo M. Frank in Adobe PDF format. Published in 1914, this 146-page book, based on the trial transcript, contains the text of some, but not all, of the nine hours of closing arguments prosecutor Dorsey made on Aug. 22, 23, and 25, 1913. Copy Available here: Argument of Hugh M. Dorsey at the Trial of Leo M. Frank. Click Here for the Long Version (the site has strong partisan opinions, but its source materials are invaluable): Hugh M. Dorsey References: American State Trials Volume 10 (1918) By John Lawson. Download the argument of Hugh M. Dorsey (right mouse click and save): Hugh M Dorsey at the Trial of Leo Frank and for the Aftermath review the massive 1,800 page legal archive on the Leo Frank case 1913 to...

The following book was just added to Leo Frank Info Library: Dr. Edward R. Fields Analysis Dr. Edward R. Fields wrote his take on the case in The Thunderbolt magazine in February 1961. He takes the side against Frank as you will clearly see by reading it. Adobe PDF Format: Dr. Edward Fields Analysis, Thunderbolt Magazine, 1961

I hope that these materials will help you to gain a far greater understanding of the case. Watsons Magazine Tom Watson published a monthly magazine and took a particular interest in Franks case. This interest stemmed in part from his own obvious anti-Semitism and also from a regional, populist, anti-big-business sentiment, as reflected in the five selected magazines we have below. But merely because we do not share many of his perspectives does not mean we cannot learn from his work both facts of the case, and the passions of the times. 1. January 1915 Watson introduces the Frank case in this edition. 2. March 1915 Here Watson goes into much further detail on the Frank case. 3. August 1915 Watson calls the Frank trial the celebrated...

See the article here:
The Murder of Mary Phagan and the Lynching of Leo Frank

Revisionist Zionism evolved into the Likud Party in Israel …

Posted By on September 7, 2015

Yale Accords Research

Israel

In contemporary Israel political representation can be divided into three major groups: Likud, Labor, and the religious parties (namely the National Religious Party, Shas and United Torah Judiasm). Together, these three blocs comprise 89 seats of the Knesset's (the Israeli Parliament) 120 seats. The respective breakdown is 32 seats for the Likud, 34 for Labor, and 23 for the religious parties. The current ruling coalition, under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is a conglomerate of the Likud, the three religious parties, and a number of less important parties such as a new immigrant's party (Yisrael Ba'aliyah) to name one. For our purposes we will stick to discussing only the Likud, Labor and the religious parties. It is now necessary to briefly review the history and positions of the three respective political blocs vis a vis the peace process and relations between Israel and her Arab neighbors in general.

The Likud The Likud is modern Israel's largest right of center political party. Likud has its ideological roots in the Revisionist Zionist movement founded by Zeev Jabotinsky in the early twentieth century before Israel became an independent state. The Revisionists advocated a Jewish State on both sides of the Jordan River (meaning today what comprises, Israel, the West Bank and Gaza, and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan). Decidedly militaristic in their outlook, the Revisionists advocated mass and rapid Jewish immigration to the new state to facilitate the creation of a Jewish majority throughout the land and the establishment of a strong Jewish army to defend the new state. Once Israel was born in 1948 Revisionist ideology was carried on by Menachem Begin's Herut Party. The Herut (which later along with some smaller parties merged to become the modern day Likud) became Israel's perennial opposition party until it finally won an election in 1977. Since 1977 it has been in power (either through coalitions with smaller parties or in a power-sharing arrangement with Labor) for all but four years. For decades it advocated keeping and settling many of the territories (the West Bank, the Gaza Strip and the Golan Heights) Israel captured in the 1967 Arab-Israeli War. Not only did the Likud view these territories as essential to Israel's security; they also firmly believed much of it (the West Bank and Gaza) was part of "Biblical Israel" and the rightful property of the Jews. Ironically, it was a Likud government that was the first to trade land for peace in the 1979 Israeli-Egyptian Peace Treaty in which Israel returned the Sinai Peninsula to Egypt in exchange for peace. Since the election of a Likud government in the aftermath of the Oslo Accords in 1996, the party under Netanyahu's leadership has slowly reconciled itself to giving land to the Palestinians in exchange for security guarantees. The 1997 Hebron Accord and 1998 Wye Agreement were both milestones for the Likud. In both agreements a Likud-led government agreed for the first time to turn over land in the West Bank (the heart of Biblical Israel) to the Palestinian Authority, the city of Hebron in the former and 13% of the West Bank as part of an interim arrangement in the latter. Today's Likud accepts the Oslo Accords and the need to trade land for peace but does so suspiciously and reluctantly. It advocates the continued expansion of Jewish settlements on these lands which many feel are obstacles to the continuation of the peace process and contradict its very spirit. Today's Likud also advocates maintaining a united Jerusalem and the Golan Heights under full Israeli sovereignty. Although still officially opposed to creation of an independent Palestinian State, many believe today's Likud Party would accept the creation of an independent Palestinian State as long as it was demilitarized and under significant military restrictions.

The Labor Party The Labor Party is Israel's major left of center political party. Labor has its roots in Zionist-Socialist movements that sprung up in Europe and in Palestine before Israel's creation in 1948. Today's Labor Party is the direct descendent of David Ben-Gurion's Mapai Party which led the battle for an independent Jewish State and took the reins of government when Israel was first founded. Labor-led coalitions ruled Israel uninterrupted between 1948 and 1977. Since 1977, Labor has been in and out of the governing coalition. The Labor Party traditionally advocates a more compromising position on the disputed territories to facilitate peace agreements between Israel and her Arab neighbors than both the Likud and the religious parties. Labor generally does not subscribe to the belief that Israel must keep all of what comprised "Biblical Israel" and believes in exchanging land populated with Palestinians that it deems not vital to Israel's security. Beyond territorial exchange, Labor favors freezing the expansion of Jewish settlements on the West Bank and Gaza Strip and advocates greater economic and cultural ties between Israel and her neighbors. The 1993 Oslo Accords between Israel and the PLO along with the 1994 Israeli-Jordanian Peace Treaty were all initiated under a Labor-led coalition. Labor also accepts in principle the need to achieve peace with Syria through territorial compromise on the Golan Heights. Labor, like the other two major political blocs, believes that in any final-status agreement with the Palestinians, Jerusalem must remain united under full Israeli sovereignty. Labor unlike, the other two political blocs, also now openly accepts the need for a demilitarized Palestinian State as long as Israel maintains defensible borders.

The Religious Parties Israel's three major religious parties differ dramatically on a whole host of issues including the peace process. Shas and United Torah Judaism (UTJ) generally maintain fairly neutral positions on the peace process because their main focus is on increasing religious influence and power within the State of Israel. Their constituents, however, generally lean rightward on the peace process and are opposed to territorial compromise. Because of this, Shas and the UTJ, generally feel more comfortable in right-wing coalitions led by the Likud. The National Religious Party (the NRP), however, takes a forceful and loud position on the peace process. Firmly right-wing, the NRP rejects any territorial compromise with the Arabs and refuses to recognize the Oslo Accords as legitimate. As stronger believers in Israel's right to "Biblical Israel" (the West Bank and Gaza), the NRP advocates the massive expansion of Jewish settlements in the territories and East Jerusalem. The NRP also advocates maintaining the Golan Heights under full Israeli sovereignty. Of all three political blocs discussed, the religious parties (taken as a whole) are by the far the most right-wing and least willing to compromise to attain peace between Israel and her Arab neighbors.

Read more from the original source:
Revisionist Zionism evolved into the Likud Party in Israel ...

Jewish Jewels Messianic Jewish Worldwide Ministry

Posted By on September 7, 2015

Ruth Listen to the story of Ruth, a woman of Moab. An incredible woman of God. View Program

Messianic Judaism Join Neil and Jamie as they explore the future of Messianic Judaism. View Program

Priestly Blessing Watch Neil and Jamie explain the most famous blessing in Judaism: View Program

Lost and Found What does it mean to be lost? What is Gods plan for Hislost sheep? View Program

Hebrew Hebrew is the language of the Bible, a holy tongue, once dead, now resurrected. View Program

Purim Experience Purim with the Lash family at Temple Aron HaKodesh. View Program

Yeshua in the Feasts Learn how Gods appointed times, outlined in Leviticus 23, has special meaning. View Program

Passover Join a Messianic Jewish Passover Seder at the home of Neil and Jamie Lash. View Program

Alef Neil and Jamie are joined by Israeli Hebrew scholar Dr. Danny Ben-Gigi. View Program

Bet Dr. Danny Ben-Gigi introduces fascinating insights and biblical truths. View Program

Gimel Dr. Danny Ben-Gigi introduces each letter of the Hebrew Alef-Bet and its word picture. View Program

Shofar What does God promise to do when He hears us blow the shofar? View Program

Who has believed our report? And to whom has the arm of the LORD been revealed? Isaiah 53:1

Behold, I lay in Zion, a chief cornerstone, elect, precious, and he who believes on Him will by no means be put to shame.1 Peter 2:6

All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned, every one, to his own way; and the LORD has laid on Him the iniquity of us all. Isaiah 53:6

Then Yeshua (Jesus) spoke to them again, saying, I am the light of the world. He who follows Me shall not walk in darkness, but have the light of life. John 8:12

I am the vine, you are the branches. He who abides in Me, and I in him, bears much fruit. . .John 15:5

Link:
Jewish Jewels Messianic Jewish Worldwide Ministry

Anne Frank (2001) – Rotten Tomatoes

Posted By on September 7, 2015

Even at just over three hours, a reasonably fitting runtime for this subject matter and relatively shorter runtime for a miniseries, the series remains plagued by excess material, particularly filler that especially slows down the momentum and drives unevenness amidst this should-be frequently moving story. Excess material grows less and less severe as the story progresses, yet remains all too common throughout, bloating a story of such tonal dynamicity to the point of making many of the tonal shifts jarring, and it doesn't help that there are still some spots of scenario set-up and exposition that are either glossed over or crowbarred in ever so awkwardly. These are common issues among miniseries of this type, yet with a story with this much depth, dynamicity and momentum, it can't afford to have such storytelling flaws as excessive bloating and akward, if not hurried exposition, much less the central flaw that it all leads back to. What is one of the biggest betrayals to the series' story, as well as the ultimate fault within the series is simply the fact that it pulls that old TV network (Especially ABC) bad move of being much too unsubtle, exploiting the aforementioned excessive filler and forced exposition, as well as some overbearingness in tone and a fair deal of almost inhumanly obvious pieces of dialogue or action, as manipulative forms of story and character fleshing, while not taking enough time to extensively explore depth or smooth out the edges, making for a series of limited dynamicity that just gel all that terribly well with the extreme dynamicity within the extremely human subject matter. This betrayal is hardly offensive, let alone as offensive as I make it sound, yet the series still leaves much to be desired, and were it more comfortable in its sprawling length, with more tightness of filler, more depth in exposition and, overall, more subtlty, depth and livliness, it would have quite possibly made for a sensational experience. As it stands, however, every flaw goes counteracted by truly remarkable strengths, some of which all but, if not decidedly redeem some of the flaws listed. The series is no huge masterpiece (Thanks a lot, ABC), yet it is a worthwhile saga, with high points that are sometimes actually contradictory to the faults, as well as consistent strengths that make it reasonably easy to power through the flaws.

Through all of its limitations, the series is considerably well-produced, with lively production designs that very cleverly replicate the era, as well as sharp art direction that almost brilliantly plays with scope, presenting a degree of sweep that reflects the reach of consequence throughout the areas plagued by the dreaded grip of the Nazis, yet still boasts a degree of intimacy that gives us a feel for the isolation and humanity of our characters in an actually subtle fashion that may go outweighed by the general unsubtlty of the final product, yet still makes good use of the excessive fleshing out. Another aspect that makes good use of the overwhelming filler is the direction, for although poor Robert Dornhelm finds his hands tied by the excessiveness, to where he can't bypass its generally being a mess, he still manages to absorb from all of unsbutleties and filler a surprising and undeniably considerable degree of charm that certainly doesn't redeem the unsubtlties, yet certainly helps you in somewhat accepting them until Dornhelm finally breaks through and really delivers. Now, the series has its more subtle points, yet is almost entirely rather blatant, even at its core emotional moments, and there's nothing that Dornhelm can do about that, so thus, when he needs to most, he doesn't so much succumb to the unsubtlties as much as he embraces them and use them to his advantage, meditating upon the center of the tone and enhancing the focus with the unsubtle supplements, pushing and pushing until he breaks in a genuinely non-manipulative fashion and creates intense resonance, thus making the most consequential moments tense and the most emotional moments near crushing, especially during the heartbreakingly unflinching final segment. If Dornhelm could do so much with unsubtle material, then I itch to find out what he could have done with a more cleverly-crafted script, yet I'll take what I can get and what I'm getting is a product that's more often than rather distant, yet truly impacting when emotion does carry through, and for that, credit not only goes out to Dornhelm, but his performers. As components to the unsubtlty, certain characters are written to have only so many layers, and some are not even lucky enough for their limited layers to not feel a smidge exaggerated, yet most everyone has his or her time in sun, in which they manage to transcend the flaws in the character structuring for satisfyingly contradictory depth and even a few layers. Still, it's our young "lead" (She's third down on the cast list on IMDB; What?) Hannah Taylor-Gordon who is presented with the most layered material and delivers the most in execution, nailing the initial youthful optimism and noble spirit of Anne Frank with electric charisma that draws you in, especially when you consider that this optimism shan't last. Well, sure enough, tragedy and danger falls upon young Anne Frank and plunges her into a world she much mature to in order to survive, at which point, Taylor-Gordon unveils a transformation in Frank that's so genuine, so emotional and so intensely atmospheric that it doesn't simply steal the show, but draws unexpected depth through all of the unsubtlty from the person who should have the most depth, making for a transformative and compelling lead performance by that stands as one of the keys to the series' ultimately emerging much more satisfying than not.

Bottom line, the excessive bloating - mostly through superfluous filler - and limited meditation upon smoothing out the story leave tonal shifts uneven and stand alongside writing spots and some overbearingness in tone as supplements to the series' central problem of being tremendously unsubtle, not absorbing enough depth for truly impacting resonance, yet what the series does get right, it nails with impressive results, whether it be clever production and art direction that creates a feel for the environment, or Robert Dornhelm's mostly inspired direction, which keeps the less resonant moments going with charm and strikes at opportunity of genuineness to create some undeniably strong emotional surges, and does so with the help of a myriad of strong performances, headed by an enthralling and layered Hanna Taylor-Gordon, who helps in ultimately making "Anne Frank: The Whole Story" a consistently charming, periodically resonant and ultimately rewarding extensive portrait on the timeless tale.

3/5 - Good

View original post here:
Anne Frank (2001) - Rotten Tomatoes

Anne Frank (Author of The Diary of a Young Girl Book …

Posted By on September 7, 2015

On this page you can find Anne Frank book collection. Anne Frank is author of The Diary of a Young Girl book and 59 more book like The Diary of a Young Girl: Definitive Edition, The Diary of Anne Frank and A Family Secret

By: Anne Frank Published: 04 Feb 2002

By: Anne Frank Published: 28 Feb 2003

By: Anne Frank Published: 10 Aug 2015

By: Anne Frank Published: 30 Mar 2000

By: Anne Frank Published: 01 Mar 1997

By: Anne Frank Published: 07 Jun 2012

By: Anne Frank Published: 20 Mar 1989

By: Anne Frank Published: 31 Jan 2003

Published: 01 Dec 2009

By: Anne Frank Published: 01 Jun 1993

By: Eric Heuvel Published: 01 Dec 2009

By: Anne Frank Published: 15 Apr 2008

By: Anne Frank Published: 01 Dec 2007

By: Anne Frank Published: 19 Oct 2010

By: Anne Frank Published: 04 Mar 2003

By: Anne Frank Published: 02 Jun 2011

By: Anne Frank Published: 07 Jun 2012

By: Anne Cranny-Francis Published: 22 Feb 2003

By: Anne Frank Published: 02 Apr 2015

By: Anne Frank Published: 01 Oct 1999

By: Anne Frank Published: 01 Jul 1996

By: Anne Frank Published: 18 Sep 2013

By: Anne Frank Published: 24 Nov 2015

By: Anne Frank Published: 04 Jun 2010

By: Anne Frank Published: 26 Apr 2003

By: Anne Frank Published: 06 Oct 2011

By: Frances Goodrich Published: 31 Jan 1998

By: Anne Frank Published: 01 Mar 1995

By: Anne Frank Published: 01 Dec 2008

By: Anne Frank Published: 11 May 2015

By: Anne Frank Published: 04 Nov 2011

By: Anne Frank House Published: 01 Jan 2015

By: Anne Frank Published: 09 Jun 2012

By: Anne Frank Published: 08 Nov 2010

By: Anne Frank Published: 04 Jul 2013

By: Anne Frank Published: 01 Jun 2000

By: Anne Frank Published: 01 Jan 2009

By: Anne Frank House Published: 21 Nov 2008

By: Anne Frank Published: 23 Oct 2013

By: Anne Frank Published: 06 Feb 1997

By: Anne Cranny-Francis Published: 03 Oct 2005

By: Anne Frank Published: 01 Feb 2002

By: Anne Frank Published: 01 Sep 2012

By: Anne Frank Published: 01 Feb 1997

By: Anne Frank Published: 01 Feb 1996

By: Anne Frank Published: 08 May 2014

By: Sally-anne Francis Published: 30 Jun 2015

Published: 03 May 2006

By: Barbara Kingsolver Published: 01 Mar 2012

By: Sibylle Picot Published: 19 Jul 2014

By: Anne Frank Published: 14 May 2008

By: Frank, Anne, 1929-1945

Published: 22 Sep 2014

By: And Fran Anne and Fran Published: 01 Dec 2008

By: Anne Frank Published: 31 Dec 1998

By: Anne Frank Published: 15 Jun 2010

By: Anne Frank Published: 01 Jul 2004

By: Anne Frank Published: 01 Feb 1999

By: Anne Frank Published: 01 Mar 1999

By: Anne Frank Published: 01 Dec 1996

See the original post here:
Anne Frank (Author of The Diary of a Young Girl Book ...

Anne Frank – Google Cultural Institute

Posted By on September 7, 2015

Her life, her diary, her legacy

Anne Frank is one of the millions of victims of the persecution of the Jews during World War II. For two years, Anne and her family were in hiding in the annex of her fathers business. There, she wrote her diary. Anne Frank died in a concentration camp when she was fifteen. Her diary survived the war. It has been translated into more than seventy languages, and it has made Anne famous all over the world. The original diary is on display in the Anne Frank House.

Childhood in Germany Anne Frank is born on 12 June 1929 in Frankfurt am Main, Germany. She is the second and youngest daughter of Otto Frank and Edith Frank-Hollnder. Margot, Annes sister, is three years older. The Frank family is Jewish.

Otto Frank works for the family bank. Because of the severe economic crisis in Germany, business is not going well. Otto and Edith Frank are very worried about their future. Antisemitism is increasing. More and more people support Adolf Hitlers antisemitic NSDAP party and in 1933, Hitler takes over as leader of the German government.

Otto has the chance to set up a local branch of Opekta in Amsterdam.Opekta is a business that sells pectin, a gelling agent for making jam. Otto and his wife decide to move to The Netherlands.

Safein Amsterdam In 1933, Anne Frank and her family move to an apartment on the Merwedeplein in Amsterdam-Zuid, a neighborhood where many Jewish refugees find a home.

Anne and Margot learn Dutch quickly and soon feel at home in Holland. Anne is a bubbly, curious girl who likes to be the center of attention. Margot is more quiet and serious. She always gets good grades in school.

Otto Frank sets up his business in the center of Amsterdam. Because he works hard, he is often away from home. Edith Frank has a hard time getting used to her new life in The Netherlands. She is homesick and very worried about her family in Germany.

The situation in Germany is becoming increasingly threatening for Jews. In November 1938, a large pogrom, Kristallnacht, takes place. In March of 1939, Ediths mother leaves Germany and moves in with the Frank family.

In 1939 Germany invades Poland, causing England and France to declare war on Germany. Warsaw is bombed. The persecution of Jews starts almost immediately.

The German invasion of Holland In May 1940 Germany invades Holland, and after the bombing of Rotterdam the Dutch government capitulates. The German occupation has begun.

General Winkelman arriving at German Army headquarters to sign the Dutch surrender, May 15, 1940.

Anti-Jewish regulations Soon after the invasion in 1940, the Nazis start introducing anti-Jewish regulations. They make life increasingly difficult for Jews. Jewish civil servants are fired. Jews are no longer allowed to visit parks, cinemas and swimming pools and Jewish children are forced to go to separate Jewish schools.

Annes diary On 12 June 1942 Anne Frank turns thirteen. One of her birthday gifts is a red and white checkered diary. She immediately starts to write in it. The diary is her most cherished possession, and Anne takes it with her when the Frank family goes into hiding three weeks later.

Persecution of the Jews As the German occupation continues, the situation becomes more and more dangerous for Jews in Holland. From May 1942, all Jews have to wear a yellow star on their clothing. Starting in July of that year, Jews are called up to report for work duty. Allegedly they are sent to labor camps in Germany. In reality they are transported to concentration camps to be killed.

To avoid deportation, Otto and Edith Frank have been preparing a secret hiding place in the back of the annex to Ottos business.Margot Frank is one of the first to receive a summons to report for a labor camp on 5 July 1942. The next day, the Frank family leaves for the hiding place on the Prinsengracht.

The Franks share their hiding place with Ottos business partner Hermann van Pels, his wife Auguste and their son Peter. Ottos employees Bep Voskuijl, Victor Kugler, Johannes Kleiman and Miep Gies and her husband Jan supply them with food.

During the day, the people in hiding have to keep very quiet. The people working in the warehouse below must not find out that there are Jews hiding in the secret annex. Only at night and during the weekends can they speak without whispering and flush the toilet.

After a few months, on 16 November 1942, an eighth person comes to live in the secret annex: Fritz Pfeffer. He is Miep Gies dentist. To make room for him, Margot moves to her parents room, and Anne shares her room with Fritz Pfeffer.

Our many Jewish friends and acquaintances are being taken away in droves. The Gestapo is treating them very roughly () If it's that bad in Holland, what must it be like in those faraway and uncivilized places where the Germans are sending them? We assume that most of them are being murdered. The English radio says they're being gassed. Perhaps that's the quickest way to die. Anne Frank, 9 October 1942

You've known for a long time that my greatest wish is to be a journalist, and later on, a famous writer. Anne Frank, 11 May 1944

Is this really the beginning of the long-awaited liberation? (...) Oh Kitty, the best part about the invasion is that I have the feeling that friends are on the way. Anne Frank, 6 June 1944

The people in hiding follow the news about the Normandy invasion with enthusiasm and hope. Otto Frank marks the allied army advances with pins on the map on the wall of the Frank family room in the secret annex.

Annes death On 4 August 1944 the people in hiding are arrested: they have been betrayed. They are sent to the Westerbork transit camp in the Netherlands. On 3 September they are deported to the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp in German-occupied Poland. There, the men and women are separated. Anne sees her father for the last time. She is assigned to a womens barracks withMargot and Edith.

At the end of October Anne and Margot are transported to the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp in Germany. Their mother Edith remains in Auschwitz-Birkenau and dies there on 6 January 1945.

After an awful train journey lasting three days, Anne and Margot arrive at Bergen-Belsen in Germany. The camp is overpopulated and they have to live in tents. When the tents are destroyed during a heavy storm, the prisoners are moved to already overcrowded barracks.

Bergen-Belsen is terrible. There is little or no food and the sanitary conditions are dreadful. Many prisoners become ill and die. Margot and Anne Frank contract typhus. They die in March 1945, just a few weeks before the camp is liberated.

Hanneli Goslar and Anne Frank have known each other since kindergarten. They haven't met since 1942, when Anne went into hiding. In Bergen-Belsen Hanneli looks back to the last time she talked to Anne.

After the Russians liberate Auschwitz on 27 January 1945, Otto Frank is free. He is the only one of the eight people in hiding who survives the war.

7 May 1945, surrender of the German army in Western Europe in Reims, France.

Otto returns After a long and chaotic journey, Otto returns to Amsterdam in June 1945. He moves in with Miep and Jan Gies. He already knows that his wife Edith is dead, but he knows nothing of the fate of his daughters. A few weeks later he hears that Anne and Margot are both dead. Only then does Miep give him Annes diary. She has kept it safe since the familys arrest.

The diary is published After much deliberation, Otto Frank decides to have Annes diary published. At first, it is difficult to find a publisher. Otto shows the diary to several people. One of them is historian Jan Romein. He writes an article about it for the national newspaper 'Het Parool' of 3 April 1946. The article attracts the attention of the publishing company Contact. It decides to publish the diary. 'Het Achterhuis' is published on 25 June 1947. Annes dream of becoming a writer comes true after her death.

The publication of the English edition 'Anne Frank: The diary of a young girl' in 1952 makes Annes diary famous.It is adapted for the theater by two American dramatists in 1955. The play becomes a huge success on Broadway. In 1959 the play is made into a film with Milly Perkins playing Anne Frank.

From hiding place to museum The success of the diary creates an interest in Anne Franks hiding place. Soon, people come by wanting to see the secret annex and they are shown around by the Opekta employees. In 1955 the company moves. Because the building is in a dilapidated state, there are plans for demolition but thanks to the efforts of prominent Amsterdam citizens, it is saved. Together with Otto Frank they establish the Anne Frank House and the museum is opened to the public on 3 May 1960.

In 1953 Otto Frank marries Fritzi Markovits and they move to Switzerland. His daughters diary continues to play an important role in his life. He receives thousands of letters from readers from all over the world. Fritzi and Otto reply to them. Otto dies in 1980.

Follow this link:
Anne Frank - Google Cultural Institute

Israel, The West Bank and Gaza Travel Warning

Posted By on September 6, 2015

The Department of State strongly warns U.S. citizens against travel to the Gaza Strip; U.S. government employees are not allowed to conduct official or personal travel there. U.S. government personnel require special security arrangements if traveling inside Israel within seven kilometers of the Gaza demarcation line. With the exception of Jericho and Bethlehem, U.S. government employees are prohibited from personal travel to the West Bank. Due to security concerns, U.S. government employees are prohibited from using public buses throughout Israel and the West Bank, and must obtain advance approval if they wish to travel within 1.5 miles (2.4 kilometers) of the Lebanon border, or travel on or east of Route 98 in the Golan Heights. U.S. citizens should take into consideration the following information, including the rules governing travel in this region by U.S. government employees. This replaces the Travel Warning issued September 10, 2014.

Major Metropolitan Areas

Personal safety conditions in major metropolitan areas, including Tel Aviv and Haifa and surrounding regions, are comparable to other major global cities. Nonetheless, the July-August 2014 Gaza conflict (see below) and subsequent political and religious tension associated with access to the Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount in the Old City of Jerusalem led to increased levels of violence, particularly in Jerusalem and West Bank environs, not seen in those areas in a decade. Attacks on individuals and groups have occurred in East and West Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, and Bethlehem, as well as various places in the West Bank. We have no indication that U.S. citizens have been specifically targeted based on their nationality, however U.S. citizens have been directly affected. Six U.S. citizen residents of Israel and the West Bank were killed and others injured in multiple attacks in 2014. U.S. citizens involved in or observing political demonstrations have sustained serious injuries and the Department of State recommends that U.S. citizens avoid all demonstrations for their ownsafety. Due to security concerns, U.S. government employees are prohibited from using public buses in Israel and the West Bank. See below for specific safety and security information regarding Gaza, the West Bank, Jerusalem, and near Israels northern borders.

Travelers should be aware of the risks presented by the potential for military conflict between Hamas and Israel. During the conflict in Gaza in July and August 2014, long-range rockets launched from Gaza reached many locations in Israel and the West Bank including Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, and other cities in the north and south. The Government of Israels Iron Dome missile defense system successfully intercepted many rockets. However, missile impacts also caused deaths, injuries, and property damage. There have been additional small arms fire and mortar and rocket launches from Gaza into southern Israel on several occasions between September and December 2014 that resulted in limited property damage.

Visitors to and residents of Israel and the West Bank should familiarize themselves with the location of the nearest bomb shelter or other hardened site.Consult municipality websites, such as those forJerusalemandTel Aviv, for locations of public bomb shelters and other emergency preparedness information. Visitors should seek information on shelters from hotel staff or building managers. We advise all U.S. citizens to take note of guidance on proper procedures in the event of rocket attacks or other crisis events by visiting the website of the government of Israel'sHome Front Command.

Travelers should also be aware of the heightened state of alert maintained by Israeli authorities along Israel's border with Egypt. There have been cross-border incidents from Egypt, including rocket attacks and ground incursions, such as attacks that took place in August 2013, January 20 and October 22, 2014. Rockets and mortars were launched from Sinai in the direction of Eilat and Israels Negev region in January, July, and August 2014.

Visitors should observe appropriate personal security practices to reduce their vulnerability to crime, particularly late at night or in isolated areas, including in the countryside. Visitors are advised to avoid large gatherings or demonstrations and keep current with local news, which is available through numerous English language sources.

Jerusalem

U.S. citizens visiting and living in Jerusalem should be aware of the numerous political, cultural, and religious tensions that permeate the city. These sensitivities have the potential to fuel protests, civil unrest, acts of terrorism, and retaliatory attacks against groups and individuals. There have been frequent clashes between protesters and Israeli authorities, particularly in East Jerusalem neighborhoods. Travelers should be aware that protest activities and violence have occurred across Jerusalem, including in West Jerusalem, within the Old City, and in East Jerusalem neighborhoods such as Sheikh Jarrah, Shufat, Beit Hanina, Mt. of Olives, As Suwaneh, Abu Deis, Silwan, Shuafat Refugee Camp, Issawiyeh, and Tsur Baher. The intensity and number of these violent events, which have caused the deaths of bystanders, remained at high levels during October and November. Such events often increase following Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif access restrictions, in retaliation for random attacks, or during Israel National Police (INP) operations in predominantly Palestinian neighborhoods. The INP often deploys a heavy presence in many of the neighborhoods that have seen clashes and may restrict vehicular traffic to some of these neighborhoods without notice. U.S. citizens are advised not to enter any neighborhoods while restricted by the INP and to avoid any locations with active clashes.

To date, the clashes and violence have not been anti-American in nature. However, politically motivated violence in Jerusalem claimed the lives of U.S. citizens in October and November 2014, including a terror attack inside a synagogue. Other U.S. citizens have also been injured in such attacks. Travelers are reminded to exercise caution at Muslim religious sites on Fridays and on holy days, particularly during the holy month of Ramadan. The INP often imposes restrictions on visitors to the Old Citys Temple Mount/ Haram al-Sharif. Travelers should be aware that the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif is often closed without warning by the INP. U.S. government employees are prohibited from entering the Old City on Fridays during Ramadan due to congestion and security-related access restrictions.

U.S. citizens are advised to avoid public parks in Jerusalem after dark, due to numerous reports of criminal activity associated with these parks.

Northern Israeland Golan Heights

Rocket attacks into Israel from Lebanon have occurred without warning along the Israeli-Lebanese border. Tensions have increased along portions of the Disengagement Zone with Syria in the Golan Heights as a result of the internal conflict occurring in Syria. Sporadic gunfire has occurred along the border region. There have been several incidents of mortar shells and light arms fire impacting on the Israeli-controlled side of the zone as a result of spillover from the fighting in Syria. Travelers should be aware that cross-border gunfire can occur without warning. Furthermore, there are active land mines in areas of the Golan Heights, so visitors should walk only on established roads or trails. The Syrian conflict is sporadic and unpredictable. Because of concerns about security on Israels northern borders, U.S. government personnel must obtain advance approval if they wish to travel within 1.5 miles (2.4 kilometers) of the Lebanon border, or travel on or east of Route 98 in the Golan Heights.

The West Bank

The Department of State urges U.S. citizens to exercise caution when traveling to the West Bank. In October 2014, a U.S. citizen teenager was killed in an encounter with Israeli security forces in Silwad, and in June 2014, three Israeli teenagers, including a dual U.S. citizen, were kidnapped and murdered by Hamas-affiliated individuals while hitchhiking near Hebron. Demonstrations and violent incidents can occur without warning, and vehicles are sometimes damaged by rocks, Molotov cocktails, and gunfire on West Bank roads. U.S citizens have been killed in such attacks in the past. There have also been an increasing number of violent incidents involving Israeli settlers and Palestinian villagers in the corridor stretching from Ramallah to Nablus, including attacks by Israeli settlers on Palestinian villages in which U.S. citizens have suffered injury or property damage, as well as attacks by Palestinians on settlements. U.S. citizens can be caught in the middle of potentially dangerous situations, and some U.S. citizens involved in political demonstrations in the West Bank have sustained serious injuries. The Department of State recommends that U.S. citizens avoid all demonstrations for their own safety. During periods of unrest, the Israeli government may restrict access to the West Bank, and some areas may be placed under curfew. All persons in areas under curfew should remain indoors to avoid arrest or injury. Security conditions in the West Bank may hinder the ability of U.S. government officials to offer timely assistance to U.S. citizens.

Personal travel in the West Bank by U.S. government personnel and their families is permitted to the towns of Bethlehem and Jericho and on Routes 1, 443, and 90 after completing certain security procedures. The Rachels Tomb checkpoint between Jerusalem and Bethlehem has seen an increase in public demonstrations, which have the potential to become violent. U.S. government officials may also engage in personal travel to Qumran off Route 90 by the Dead Sea and to the Allenby Bridge crossing to Jordan, as well as stops at roadside facilities along Routes 1 and 90. All other personal travel by U.S. government personnel in the West Bank is prohibited. U.S. government personnel routinely travel to the West Bank for official business, but do so with special security arrangements.

The Gaza Strip

The Department of State strongly urges U.S. citizens to avoid all travel to the Gaza Strip, which is under the control of Hamas, a foreign terrorist organization. U.S. citizens in Gaza are advised to depart immediately. U.S. government U.S. citizen employees are not allowed to travel to Gaza, in either personal or professional capacities. U.S. government travel within seven kilometers of the Gaza demarcation requires special security arrangements. The security environment within Gaza, including its border with Egypt and its seacoast, is dangerous and volatile. Exchanges of fire between the Israel Defense Forces and militant groups in Gaza take place regularly, and civilians have been caught in the crossfire in the past. Since late October 2014, Egyptian authorities have closed the Rafah crossing between Gaza and Egypt for extended periods with no indication regarding when it will reopen for normal traffic. When operating, the Rafah crossing normally allows for some passenger travel, however, prior coordination with local authorities - which could take days or weeks to process - may be required and crossing points may be closed for days or weeks. Travelers who enter the Gaza Strip through the Rafah crossing must also exit through the Rafah crossing, and those entering the Gaza Strip may not be able to depart at a time of their choosing. Many U.S. citizens have been unable to exit Gaza or faced lengthy delays while attempting to exit Gaza. Furthermore, the schedule and requirements for exiting through the Rafah crossing are unpredictable and can involve significant expense. The ability of U.S. government personnel to offer timely assistance to U.S. citizens, including assistance departing Gaza, is extremely limited. The Consulate General and Embassy are often unable to assist U.S. citizens to exit Gaza via the Erez crossing to Israel. U.S. citizens who choose to travel to Gaza cannot normally rely on the U.S. government to assist them in departing Gaza.

Entry/Exit Difficulties

Some U.S. citizens holding Israeli nationality, possessing a Palestinian identity card, or who are of Arab or Muslim origin have experienced significant difficulties in entering or exiting Israel or the West Bank. U.S. citizens planning to travel to Israel, the West Bank, or Gaza should consult the detailed information concerning entry and exit difficulties in theCountry Specific Information.

U.S. citizens seeking to depart Israel, the West Bank, or Gaza are responsible for making their own travel arrangements. The lack of a valid U.S. passport may hinder U.S. citizens' ability to depart the country and may slow the U.S. Embassy or Consulate General's ability to provide assistance.

Travelers should check the status of border crossings before embarking on trips.

Contact theConsular Section of the U.S. Embassyfor information and assistance in Israel, the Golan Heights, and ports of entry at Ben Gurion Airport, Haifa Port, the northern (Jordan River/Sheikh Hussein) and southern (Arava) border crossings connecting Israel and Jordan, and the border crossings between Israel and Egypt. An embassy officer can be contacted at (972) (3) 519-7575 from Monday through Friday during working hours. The after-hours emergency number is (972) (3) 519-7551.

Contact theConsular Section of the U.S. Consulate General in Jerusalemfor information and assistance in Jerusalem, the West Bank, the Gaza Strip, and the Allenby/King Hussein Bridge crossing between the West Bank and Jordan, at (972) (2) 630-4000 from Monday through Friday during working hours. The after-hours emergency number is (972) (2) 622-7250.

For More Information

The Department of State urges those U.S. citizens who live in or travel to Israel, the West Bank or Gaza to enroll in the Department of StatesSmart Traveler Enrollment Program (STEP)in order to obtain the most current information on travel and security within Israel, the West Bank and Gaza. Enrollment in STEP makes it easier for the Embassy or Consulate General to contact U.S. citizens in case of emergency. For information on "What the Department of State Can and Can't Do in a Crisis," please visit the Bureau of Consular Affairs'Emergencies and Crisis linkatwww.travel.state.gov.

For the latest security information, U.S. citizens traveling abroad should regularly monitor theDepartment of States Internet websitewhere the Worldwide Caution,Country Specific Information for Israel, the West Bank and Gaza,Travel Warnings, andTravel Alertscan be found, including the currentTravel Warning for Israel, the West Bank and Gaza. You can also follow the Bureau of Consular Affairs onTwitterand onFacebook. Up-to-date information on security conditions can also be accessed athttp://israel.usembassy.gov,http://jerusalem.usconsulate.govor onthe EmbassyandConsulate GeneralFacebook pages.

Up-to-date information on travel and security in Israel, the West Bank and Gaza can also be obtained by calling 1-888-407-4747 toll-free in the United States and Canada, or, for callers outside of the United States and Canada, on a regular toll-line at 1-202-501-4444. These numbers are available from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday (except U.S. federal holidays).

Read the original post:
Israel, The West Bank and Gaza Travel Warning

Reform Judaism – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Posted By on September 6, 2015

The term Reform Judaism is today used for a confessional division within Judaism, especially in North America and the United Kingdom.[1] The reform movement in Judaism has historically started in the 19th century in Germany by Abraham Geiger.

"Reform Judaism" used as a proper name specifically refers to two denominations, American Reform Judaism and British Reform Judaism. For historical reasons, there is a disparity between British and American terminology. British Reform Judaism is more conservative than American Reform Judaism; American Reform Judaism approximately corresponds to what in Britain is known as Liberal Judaism, and British Reform Judaism approximately corresponds to what in America is known as Conservative Judaism ("conservative" is here used relative to positions within the reform movement, and still less conservative than Orthodox Judaism). Reconstructionist Judaism is an offshoot of Conservative Judaism. A World Union for Progressive Judaism was formed in 1926 with the aim of providing an umbrella organization for the Reform, Liberal, Progressive, and Reconstructionist movements, now summarized under the term Progressive Judaism.

In general, the Reform movement in Judaism maintains that Judaism and Jewish traditions should be modernized and compatible with participation in Western culture. This means many branches of Reform Judaism hold that Jewish law should undergo a process of critical evaluation and renewal. Traditional Jewish law is therefore often interpreted as a set of general guidelines rather than as a list of restrictions whose literal observance is required of all Jews.[2][3] Along with other forms of non-orthodox Judaism, the North American Reform, UK Reform, UK Liberal Judaism and Israeli Progressive Movement can all trace their intellectual roots to the Reform movement in Judaism which emerged in nineteenth-century Germany.[4][5][6] Elements of Orthodoxy developed their cohesive identity in reaction to the Reform movement in Judaism.[5]

Although North American Reform, UK Reform, UK Liberal Judaism and Israeli Progressive Judaism all share an intellectual heritage, they occupy different positions on the non-orthodox spectrum. The North American Reform movement and UK Liberal Judaism are situated at the more radical end. The North American Conservative movement and Masorti Judaism occupy the more conservative end of the non-orthodox Judaisms, and are not regarded as forms of Reform Judaism at all. The UK Reform[7][8][9] and Israeli Progressive movements[10] come somewhere in between.

Reform Judaism and Orthodox Judaism are the two largest denominations of American Jews today.[11] In a 2013 opinion poll, 35% of American Jews described themselves as Reform Jews (compared with 18% Conservative Judaism and 10% who identify themselves as Orthodox),[11] but in terms of actual membership Reform Judaism with an estimated 670,000 members was roughly the same size as Orthodox Judaism in 2013.[11][clarification needed] However, Reform Judaism accounts for the largest number of Jews affiliated with Progressive Judaism worldwide. It was founded by Rabbi Isaac M. Wise in Cincinnati, Ohio in the mid-1800s.

Official bodies of the Reform Movement in North America include the Union for Reform Judaism, the Central Conference of American Rabbis, and Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion.

UK Reform and Liberal Judaism are the two Progressive movements in the UK. For details on the relationship between the two progressive movements, see Progressive Judaism (United Kingdom).

After a failed attempt in the 1930s to start an Israeli movement, the World Union for Progressive Judaism tried again in the 1970s and created the movement. While calling itself "Israeli Progressive Movement" at first to stress its independence from the American counterpart, it officially changed its name to "The Reform Movement - Progressive Judaism in Israel" in 2009.

Go here to see the original:
Reform Judaism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ashkenazi Jews and Cancer – Fred Hutch

Posted By on September 5, 2015

Members of the Jewish community who trace their roots to Central or Eastern Europe are known as Ashkenazi Jews. Although today members of this community are found around the world, Ashkenazi Jews for centuries were a geographically isolated population. The isolation experienced by this population means its members can trace their ancestry back to a small number of members known as founders.

Over time, the genetic traits of these early Ashkenazi founders have been passed down through generations, including a greater frequency of carrying certain changes in genes known as BRCA1 and BRCA2, which are associated with an increased risk of cancer. Everyone has two copies of each of these genes, one that is inherited from their mother, and one from their father.

Some specific changes, or mutations, in BRCA1 and BRCA2 occur more frequently in Ashkenazi Jews than in the general population. These mutations increase the risk of certain types of cancer, including breast and ovarian in women and breast and prostate in men. About one out of every 40 individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry have a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene, as compared to one out of every 800 members of the general population, according to the Centers for Disease Control.

Although these genetic mutations increase the risk of developing some cancers, not everyone who carries a gene mutation will develop cancer. And, despite these genetic abnormalities, prevention and lifestyle strategies can still be helpful in preventing cancer.

More here:
Ashkenazi Jews and Cancer - Fred Hutch


Page 1,633«..1020..1,6321,6331,6341,635..1,6401,650..»

matomo tracker