Page 245«..1020..244245246247..250260..»

Hizbullah Official: In Next War With Israel, We Will Turn Israelis’ Lives Into Hell, They Will Be Pulling Bodies From Under The Ruins – Middle East…

Posted By on August 29, 2022

In an August 26, 2022 article in the pro-Hizbullah Lebanese daily Al-Akhbar, the daily's editor, Ibrahim Al-Amin, presents statements by a "senior jihad commander" in Hizbullah. Al-Amin describes this commander as a member of the organization's founding generation who has worked with all of Hizbullah's leaders since its inception and is a key figure in carrying out assessments and preparing for the next war with Israel. In the article the commander makes many threats regarding Israel's fate in the next war with Hizbullah, stating that this war will be devastating for Israel, since Hizbullah will destroy its infrastructures and turn the Israelis' lives into an intolerable hell. In this war, he says, the Israelis "will be pulling bodies out from under the ruins." Moreover, they will not be able to defend their territorial waters, their land border, their vital facilities or even their home front, and for the first time in its history Israel will find itself on the defensive.

The commander adds that Israel knows Hizbullah now supersedes it in many areas, both miliary and intelligence-related. It realizes Hizbullah knows "what it is doing right now, what it did in the past and what it will do in the future," and is therefore making great efforts to avoid a war, he says. He advises Israel to assume that Hizbullah possesses every weapon Iran possesses, including drones, and claims that Hizbullah even possesses abilities that Iran does not. If a wide-scale war breaks out, he warns, the Palestinian factions and the Palestinian people, including Israel's Arab citizens, will take part in it, and Hizbullah will know what to do even if Israel is assisted by other countries, especially the U.S. The commander threatens that Israel will be dealt a "severe blow" for any mistake it makes, including in the area of delineating its maritime border with Lebanon.

The article is accompanied by a map showing that all of Israel's territory is now within range of Hizbullah's missiles. The map features potential targets for a Hizbullah attack, on land and in the sea, and a list of the organization's missiles and the range of each. The article is also accompanied by images of various Iran-manufactured drones.

The map that accompanies the article

The following are translated excerpts from the commander's statements presented in Al-Amin's article.[1]

"Over [the last] 16 years, the resistance [i.e., Hizbullah] has attained a new phase, significantly different from [its situation during the war between Israel and Hizbullah in] 2006. Many of its members and fighters took part in confronting the takfiris in Syria and Iraq, thereby gaining considerable experience In that campaign they became acquainted with new technologies and kinds of weapons. [The resistance] has also acquired a lot of high-quality weapons that have been integrated into its plans. Another notable achievement is a new level of security and intelligence activity, similar to that of a large state. We have actually reached the point where the resistance knows much more about the enemy than the enemy knows about the resistance. This is a milestone that will have an impact in any future war with Israel. Perhaps the day will come when we tell them in advance what we will find on Golda's Balcony in Dimona.[2]

"The resistance has been in a constant race with the enemy, from the August 14, 2006 ceasefire to this day. The new mission given us after the war focused on building qualitative capability that can destroy the Israeli army not just prevent it from achieving its goals. From the end of the July [2006] war to this day, we have known with certainty that, according to all the assessments of the enemy, we supersede it in areas in which it never thought we would reach such advanced stages. From the publication of the Winograd report[3] through all [Israel's] large [military] exercises to the [May 2022] Chariots of Fire exercise, the enemy's conclusion was that we were overtaking it, despite its unceasing efforts to close the gaps.

"Every so often, the enemy acts as if it recognizes our advanced level of armament, but afterwards it discovers that our level is [actually] higher. We know that there are things that the enemy discovered via its intelligence efforts. But there are other things that were exposed on our initiative, and this happens in all kinds of ways

"Lately, the enemy discovered that the weapons of precision available to the resistance [i.e., to Hizbullah] did not reach us when the enemy learned about them, but much earlier. The enemy has every reason to be alarmed by what it knows [about out weapons], so it should definitely be concerned about what it does not know. Back when the enemy threatened that it would not remain silent but rather act the minute Hizbullah had 20 precise missiles, we already had hundreds of them. When it did discover them, it did remain silent. It backed down and took cover. When the enemy discovered and verified that we had hundreds of accurate missiles, it should have realized that we [already] had over thousands of them. When the enemy exposed its plans for preventing the weapons from reaching [Hizbullah], Sayyed [Nasrallah, Hizbullah's secretary-general], told it sincerely that it was a done deal and that the weapons had already arrived. The same thing happened when [the enemy] spoke about a plan to prevent the resistance from developing its capabilities. Then too, Sayyed [Nasrallah] came out and said that we were [already] manufacturing our [own] armaments and were [even] ready to sell high-quality armaments, including missiles and drones, which is proof of our manufacturing capabilities.

"The enemy is right to think that the resistance has everything that Iran has, for example in the area of drones. But the truth is that the resistance in Lebanon has capabilities appropriate for its needs and these are capabilities that even the Islamic Republic [of Iran] does not possess. The battle with the enemy has not ceased, despite the circumstances, and it never will cease. The enemy understands this, and it is making an effort to avoid war, because [it knows that] if we come to war we will wage it mightily, and it will be destructive for it in the full sense of the term. It cannot stand up to Hizbullah in all the battlefields [at once]. If it threatens us with destruction, as it usually does, we promise that the destruction of [its] entity will be greater than it can imagine. The enemy must know that this time war with Hizbullah means the destruction of the Israeli enemy's infrastructure, which will turn the settlers'[4] lives into a true hell, [and] they will not be able to live under the fire and devastation. We know for sure that during this war the enemy will be pulling bodies out from under the ruins. This is something that it and its people have not yet experienced.

"The Israeli army cannot defend its sea, and it cannot defend its essential facilities, or its land border. It cannot defend its home front from shelling. It also cannot defend itself. The conclusion is that the enemy [army] has lost its defensive capability, despite its name '[Israel] Defense Force.' That is, it has lost its raison d'etre. When it loses its defensive capability, it also loses its motivation to attack that is, it becomes a worthless army and it can be challenged. Therefore, we say that, in the war that will surely come, the Israeli army will definitely learn that it cannot defend the ships that need to enter the ports of Palestine [i.e., Israel], not to mention its own battleships. The moment the war begins, it will discover that we will not be waging a defensive war. For the first time in Israel's history, it will have to defend itself in the 1948 territories. We know that the enemy is [already] planning to evacuate the border areas five kilometers deep, and this in itself is considered retreating in advance, as far as we are concerned. So [imagine what will happen] when the enemy knows for sure that all its outposts and positions are in range of fire from the resistance.

"The Israeli army itself is the side that least wants war, because Israel's military echelons know that it has [heretofore] drawn its strength from the schisms in its surroundings and from its ability to separate the fronts and [face each of them] on its own. But today, the picture is reversed. Israel's leadership, and its army in particular, know that Israel is an artificial entity that emerged at a moment of [Arab] weakness and betrayal and was forced upon the Palestinian people, who were left alone [in the fray]. This entity has tried to survive, to remain, and to expand, under the illusion [that it has] an invincible army and with the help of diverse foreign protections. Today, the picture is the polar opposite. Today, Israel faces a resistance that has forced its will upon it. Today, [several] resistance forces and peoples have united with the Palestinian people in order to fight Israel. Today, Israel fears the resistance, and is experiencing domestic schism it never had before, while facing a determined resistance with a powerful will to fight. Israel is operating according to a plan of self-defense, and it is exposed to the resistance that is planning to attack it.

"The honorable martyr 'Abbas Musawi [former Hizbullah secretary-general killed by Israel in 1992] said that Israel had fallen. Many friends and also enemies did not realize what he meant until Israel withdrew [from Lebanon in 2000] Today, we say wholeheartedly that Israel has disintegrated and is headed towards collapse. Only time and war stand between us and this [outcome], and nothing will stop Israel's collapse. Everyone who has tied himself to Israel will collapse with it, because all the balances have shifted.

"This will be the result of every war against us, and all the more so if we are not alone. If widespread war breaks out, the Palestinian factions will participate in the battle, and with them the Palestinian people, including those in the 1948 territories. It will be a catastrophe for the enemy that will find itself facing two options: to pay the heavy, bloody price and end the war in defeat which it cannot countenance or to stop the war from the outset under the fire of the resistance.

"As part of the military assessments, some talk of the possibility that Israel will receive special aid from the U.S. and from other countries, and say that, just as the resistance forces are preparing to [fight] on one front, Israel too will not remain alone in the fray. [But] the resistance is ready for all possibilities, including dealing with those who assist Israel. Anyone who was involved in the war with the enemy knows that, in the last 10 days of the July 2006 war, the enemy received from the U.S. not only more ammunition but also experts. Things came to the point that Israel was aided by American pilots who helped its own air force and pilots, who were exhausted by the failed war [a fact that Israel] managed to conceal from the [Israeli] public, but not from us. Today, the situation is different. We think that the U.S. will not dare to fight directly alongside the enemy, because they remember well what happened to them in 1983 [the bombings of the U.S. Embassy in Beirut and later of the U.S. Marines barracks in the city] and 1984 [the bombing of the U.S. Embassy Annex in Beirut].

"The resistance's reasoning follows set rules, and its leaders are guided by principles that may be unclear to the enemy or to others who do not know us. Everyone must know certain facts that reveal the truth about us, not just in terms of our capabilities but also in terms of our ideology, and the fact that we bow to the rule of Allah since the time of the Prophet Muhammad. This is a fundamental concept in our way of thought and behavior, which makes us proficient at implementing the slogan 'we shall never surrender.'

"We are monitoring the [enemy] entity and everything in it, and we know it. The Israelis think they know everything about us and are ahead of us from the intelligence perspective. How often we have left the enemy captive to its own information and ideas! With every achievement [we make], the enemy discovers that it knows nothing about us and what we have. To give a simple example, between [Israel's withdrawal from South Lebanon in] 2000 and 2006 there were six years during which the events of the July [2006] war had an opportunity to ripen, and [the enemy] knows what happened [in that war]. This is all the more true for the 16 years that have passed since the July [2006] war. [The enemy] surely knows that the outcome [of the next war] will be completely different. The enemy realizes that we have intelligence capabilities that allow us to know what it is doing now, what it did in the past, and what it will do in the future. For we know very well how the Israelis think.

"The enemy knows that we will take advantage of every opportunity, and that any mistake it makes will cause us to deliver a heavy blow that will prevent it from even thinking about attacking in Lebanon. The issue of the maritime border is perhaps one such opportunity. If the enemy considers a response, we will strike it directly, and this will be a problem for it. They remember that, when [former assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern affairs] David Satterfield came to warn that one of our positions in the Beka'a might be attacked, we received instructions from Sayyed Hassan [Nasrallah] to arm missiles, and that if we heard only heard about an Israeli attack against us, to immediately strike targets set in advance without seeking permission from the leadership. Had the enemy carried out such an attack, it would have had dozens of fatalities. Israel discovered this afterwards. In the recent drone operation, we likewise took deliberate measures that caused the enemy to discover our drones. We are able to enter and exist [Israeli airspace] quietly, without being discovered, as we have often done in the past, [but this time we deliberately chose not to do so].

"Today we spoke about the past, about the enemy's experience with us and about the current situation. But what the enemy expects is not what will actually happen"

[1] Al-Akhbar (Lebanon), August 26, 2022.

[2] "Golda's Balcony" is allegedly an area inside Israel's Dimona nuclear weapons facility from which visitors can observe some of the activity taking place in the facility.

[3] Israel's Winograd Commission investigated the 2006 Lebanon War. Its final report was released in January 2008.

[4] "Settlers" here refers to all Israeli citizens.

Read more from the original source:

Hizbullah Official: In Next War With Israel, We Will Turn Israelis' Lives Into Hell, They Will Be Pulling Bodies From Under The Ruins - Middle East...

Why the US and Israeli Right Really Hate the Iran Nuclear Deal – Scheerpost.com

Posted By on August 29, 2022

Iran flags waving at a 2009 protest. [Marjolein Katsma / CC BY-SA 2.0]

By Juan Cole | Informed Comment

Right wing Israeli politicians such as former prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu and even centrist politicians like caretakerPrime Minister Yair Lapidhave fulminated against any US renewal of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal or Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). As with the loony Right wing in the US (increasingly the only Right wing there is), they typically allege that the JCPOA will allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. Since the treaty makes it virtually impossible for Iran to develop a nuclear device, this charge literally makes no sense.

Iran does not have a nuclear weapons program. It has a civilian program to enrich uranium for fuel for its Bushehr reactor. It has plans to expand the number of its nuclear power plants.

The way it would make a bomb if its leadership ever decided they wanted to go in that direction would be to run thousands of high-powered centrifuges to enrich the uranium and build up a stockpile of High Enriched Uranium (HEU), which could be further enriched in the thousands of advanced centrifuges, until you got it to 95% enriched. Or, it could modify a heavy water reactor being used to generate electricity so as to turn it into a breeder reactor that quickly allowed the harvesting of fissile material.

The UN and the US put sanctions on Iran, and the carrot the UN Security Council and the Obama administration used to convince Iran to mothball 80% of its nuclear enrichment program was that these sanctions would be lifted and Iran would be integrated into the world economy.

When Iran was faithfully adhering to the terms of the JCPOA in 2015-2019, it only ran 6,000 low-tech centrifuges. It was only allowed to enrich to 3.6%. It cast its entire uranium stockpile in a form that could not be further enriched. It halted building a heavy-water reactor at Arak and bricked it in. It accepted regular inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency of the UN. No country under regular IAEA inspections has ever developed an atomic bomb.

In short, the 2015 nuclear deal worked perfectly for 4 years. It made sure that Iran was not in a position to make an atom bomb as long as Tehran adhered to its terms. And if Iran ceased observing the provisions of the treaty, everyone would know it immediately.

It only failed on the economic side. The Republicans in Congress refused to allow Obama to lift US sanctions, which threaten third parties. European companies, fearing the US Treasury Department, refused to invest in Iran. So the country never really got the sanctions relief it was promised. It was taken for a ride.

Once Trump abruptly destroyed the JCPOA, and began waging war on the Iranian economy, even halting the export of Iranian petroleum, Iran felt released from its obligations. It started ramping up new and better centrifuges beyond the 6K limit. It began enriching to the level of High Enriched Uranium, getting even to 60%, which is unprecedented for that country. The IAEA faced restrictions on its inspections and found suspicious uranium signatures at sites where they shouldnt have been. Iran is much closer to having the capability to get a bomb, if it ever decided to take that step, than it ever was before. Ripping up the JCPOA freed Iran to do whatever it wanted, despite the US war on the Iranian economy, which mainly hurt ordinary Iranians, not the ayatollahs.

So it is completely illogical to charge that having Iran in the JCPOA gives it an opportunity to develop nuclear weapons.

Why would anyone say a crazy thing like that?

Neither the Israeli Right wing nor the American Right wing can possibly believe the nonsense they spew on Iran. So they must have an ulterior motive.

One thing the Right wing hates about the JCPOA is the prospect that Iran would be released from trade restrictions and would garner riches from this trade and investment. Iran would become an important trading partner of some European countries. A wealthier and more connected Iran would have more diplomatic influence and be taken more seriously in geopolitics. It could emerge as a genuine rival to Israel in these areas.

Iran emphasizes Palestinian rights and opposes the Israeli Occupation of the Palestinians, and if it were more influential, the standard Israeli narrative, that Palestinians must be deprived of basic human rights because they are inherently violent and dangerous, would begin losing its purchase.

A richer Iran could also be a more generous patron to its client militias in Iraq and Lebanon, both of which Israel sees as a dire threat.

Finally, both the American Right wing and the Israeli Right Wing want Irans government to be overthrown and replaced by a pro=Western puppet. In other words, they want to rerun the 1953 CIA coup, which deposed populist prime minister Mohammad Mosaddegh and reinstalled the exiled shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlevi. That regime change was reversed 25 years later by the Islamic Revolution, which was driven in part by resentment at the US and Britain for imposing a hated dictatorship on the Iranian people.

Some people, however, never learn any lessons, and so are dreaming again of a 1953.

So these considerations lie behind the laughable assertions by the Right wing about the Iran nuclear deal. They are maximalists. They dont actually care so much about Irans civilian nuclear enrichment program. They want to roll back and undo the Islamic Revolution and carry out a regime change operation. Short of that, they want to keep Iran under massive sanctions and bleed its economy, which might cause popular unrest and allow a regime change operation. They surely know that the JCPOA worked. They didnt want it to. They want the whole ball of wax.

Like Loading...

More:

Why the US and Israeli Right Really Hate the Iran Nuclear Deal - Scheerpost.com

Bahrain seeks to boost space collaboration with Israel – Arab News

Posted By on August 29, 2022

LONDON: Businesses in Egypt are discriminating against women who wear a hijab, a BBC Arabic investigation found.

According to the news outlet, several Egyptian women have claimed venues refused them entry because they were wearing the traditional headscarf.

BBC News Arabic tried to make reservations at 15 upmarket venues in Cairo that had been accused of discrimination.

Most of the venues requested the social media profiles of all guests, and 11 of them said that hijab-wearing women were not allowed entry.

An undercover couple, with the woman wearing a hijab, were later sent to some venues that said head coverings were not permitted.

When the couple arrived at one venue, LAubergine, they were told by the doorman that the headscarf was prohibited because there is a bar inside, which might offend women wearing a hijab.

The headscarf is forbidden. the manager confirmed.

When LAubergine was presented with recorded evidence, it denied having any policy to refuse entry to hijab-wearing women. We have reiterated our house policies to staff to avoid any confusion in the future, the venue said.

Doormen at Kazan, a fine dining restaurant, told the couple: The problem is the headscarf.

These are the house rules, they said.

Egypts constitution prohibits discrimination based on religion, sex, race or social class.

Evidence gathered by BBC Arabic was presented to Adel El-Masry, chairman of the Chamber of Tourism Establishments and Restaurants.

Never in any era of the ministry of tourism has a decision been issued banning veiled women (from leisure venues), El-Masry said.

This is not acceptable. Discrimination is unacceptable, these are public places, he added.

BBC Arabics investigation also found that La Vista, a company with projects in Cairo and several high-end coastal developments, was preventing hijab-wearing women from buying holiday apartments.

Posing as a buyer whose wife wears a hijab, BBC News Arabic contacted six property brokers about a unit at a La Vista coastal project. They said it would not be possible.

Can I speak to you frankly? Definitely look for an alternative, one broker told the undercover reporter.

To be frank with you, regarding the North Coast and Sokhna projects, they are discriminatory, said another.

A third broker explained: They will not say that we wont sell you a unit, but they will say that this project you have selected is closed now and when its open, we will call you, and they wont.

An undercover reporter who called La Vista and said that his wife wore a hijab was told that he would be put on a waiting list, as there were no available properties.

However, when he visited the La Vista office weeks later without mentioning his wife, he was told there were properties available immediately.

Asked what kind of people lived in the development, the agent replied: The idea is that all the people we have look like each other.

He added that one La Vista development has no veiled women at all.

The developer has not yet responded to BBC Arabics requests for comment.

Egyptian MP Amira Saber, a womens rights advocate, said that the Egyptian constitution is clear that such discrimination is prohibited.

I will certainly use one of my parliamentary tools to ask the officials in the government how we can ensure that this does not happen again, and if it does happen, the perpetrator must be punished, she said.

Read more:

Bahrain seeks to boost space collaboration with Israel - Arab News

All the Hebrew Curses You Need to Know – Kveller.com

Posted By on August 29, 2022

There are a lot of reasons why I love being in Israel, but perhaps an unexpected one is that I love being surrounded by Israeli curses.

Israelis are known for being aggressive, in your face people, for better and for worse, which means that they are excellent at cursing other people out. And, in Hebrew, you dont even have to get R-rated to get some of that aggression out or take someone down a peg.

Just like a lot of great Hebrew words and expressions, these come from a myriad of languages, including Yiddish, Arabic and Russian.

While I, and Kveller, do not condone cursing other people to their faces, I do appreciate the cathartic properties of cursing someone behind their backs. Let out that rage! Also, some people in the political and public sphere may warrant the curses below.

Some family-friendly curses, for the most part.

Lamlam (lo moil lo meziq) This acronym stands for doesnt do any good, doesnt do any harm, and its usually used for a person who just really isnt very helpful, but is essentially harmless either in a professional or personal setting. You probably know a lamlam or two.

Chay (male singular)/chaya (female singular)/chayim (male plural)/ chayot(female plural) beseret This is saying means living in a movie and is usually said about someone who has some pretty big delusions about life be they delusions of grandeur, paranoia or unfounded conspiracy theories.

Ochel (male singular)/ochelet (female singular)/ochlim (male plural)/ochlot (female plural) sratim When you start getting super stressed or anxious about something that youve blown way out or proportion? Youre eating movies.

Shtuyot bemitz (agvaniyot) Nonsense in (tomato) juice. This one is pretty self-explanatory! You can get creative with the kind of juice you use in this curse, but I think the classic agvaniyot always works best.

Rosh kruv This expression, which literally means cabbage head, means dummy.

Ahabal Another great curse from Arabic. This one means moron.

Sheretz Vermin. This curse isnt common, but maybe it should be?

Chadal ishim A lowlife. This is a biblical curse, and I love it so much, even if its really way too literary to be used on a daily basis.

Yimach shmo This curse means may his name be erased, and its a baddie. This is really reserved for the worst people you can think of.

Sachi Coming from the Arabic word for healthy, this word is a litmus test of sorts because its meaning has shifted through time. At first, it was used to mean straight-edge in a more derogatory sense someone who doesnt drink and smoke and who is really no fun. Lately, its also been used to mean hipster, again, not really in a positive sense.

Lo yutzlach A Yiddishified Hebrew curse that is not often used but is too adorable, this word means literally not successful, and is used in the same way as schlemiel or shlemazel: a useless, unlucky person.

Yoram Yoram is a Hebrew name and also an old-school word for geek. Not many Israelis use it, but I still think its cute. My apologies to all the actual legally named Yorams reading this.

Chachmolog A smartass!

Frayer The worst curse in the Hebrew language, which derives from Yiddish, a frayer (or freier) is a sucker and, for cultural reasons, one of the words things you can be. If you want more clarity on this, this old but very good segment of This American Life may shed some light on it.

Nudnik / Nijes Nudnik (Yiddish) and nijes (from both Yiddish and Arabic) mean a pestering, annoying, nagging and/or irritating person. Basically, someone you dont want to be.

Zevel Trash. It may be my favorite Hebrew word.

Maniac A maniac pronounced man-yak is not a violent and dangerous person in Israel, but instead, simply, an asshole.

Debil Idiot, from Russian.

Ksil The biblical and literary word for idiot.

Menuval A lot of great Hebrew curses come from the word nevela a carcass, often specifically of a non-kosher animal. A menuval is a dishonest person, a scoundrel.

If youre not into profanities, you may want to stop reading now

Lech (male singular) or lechi laazazel / kibinimat / lehizdayen The Hebrew variations of get lost are many! Lech laazazel means go to hell, from the ancient biblical term. Lech kibinimat comes from Russian and, well, it tells you to go do unmentionable things to your mother. And lech lehizdayen is the classic go fuck yourself or go get fucked.

Ben zona This one means son of a whore, and while I hate sexist curses, it is one heck of a commonly used one.

Kusemeq From Arabic, this one means your mothers c*nt. This, again very sexist curse, is used so often as an alternative for fuck when you screw something up.

Zayin The seventh Hebrew letter, the Hebrew word for penis and a commonly used curse. I especially love the saying zayin baayin, a dick in your eye (the word eye is also the name of a Hebrew letter).

Original post:

All the Hebrew Curses You Need to Know - Kveller.com

Kickass Women of the Hebrew Bible – Criminal Element

Posted By on August 29, 2022

With his new bookJewish Noir IIcoming out tomorrow, Kenneth Wishnia visits the site to pay homage to some of the most badass women from the Old Testament.

So, yeah, the Bible.

Youve probably heard of it.

Its a classic piece of crime writing, full of violence and betrayal, sexual slavery, greed, deception and murder. Been a bestseller for years.

Some decades ago, I married a Latina Catholic from Ecuador. As the child of Marxist-atheist Jews myself, its fair to say that I didnt have a lot of familiarity with the Bible, and I figured it was time to learn, since I was going to be marrying into a large Catholic family. I read the New Testament first, which prompted me to get a parallel-text edition of the Hebrew Bible (what others call the Old Testament), with the Hebrew on one side and a slightly modified King James version on the opposite page. No explanatory notes at all. That was pretty challenging, but I was determined to get through it.

The King James translation is absolutely beautiful poetry, and many of its turns of phrase, along with lengthier passages, have entered the common language. But its not always clear what the heck is going on. All that early modern English phrasing can seriously alter or even obscure meaning. And if youre bushwhacking through some of the thornier passages of the Bible, in early 17th century English no less, it can be pretty hard to follow the actions and the motivations of people responding to shifting political alignments in early Iron Age Israel circa 1050 BCE.

So this was my first time through the text, and when I got to Judgeswhich depicts a chaotic time characterized by instability and in-fighting among the twelve tribes of Israel, and with numerous regional enemiessome passages would just seem to drone on, you know, kings and battles, kings and battles, then suddenly an act of astonishing violence would smack me in the face and leave me rereading the text, trying to figure out who just did what to whom and why on earth they did it.

One passage that jumped off the page was a very short section, only four verses long, within a longer narrative, that I lacked the background to flesh outuntil now, that is.

Two powerful women figure in it.

One of them is Deborah, the other is Yael.

You may have heard about Deborah, since most English translations call her a prophet and a judge, which sounds pretty damn impressive. Women could be judges in early Iron Age Israel? Awesome!

But its even more impressive in Hebrew. Judges is not really the best translation of the Hebrew shofetim, which means chieftains, not judges. The term chieftains gives a much better sense of the tribal nature of ancient Israel in the 11th century BCE, when the action takes place.

So Deborah was a chieftain, folks.

Most English translations obscure the meaning of the term.

Judges 4:4 even says she led Israel at the time. She led Israel. Think about what that means, what it implies and suggests, especially if we consider her title of chieftain. Could we please hear a bit more about her?

As for Yael, usually spelled Jael in modern translations (and Yael in Hebrew):

Ive always been drawn to stories with strong female protagonists, and the tantalizingly brief story of Yael has been stuck in my mind since I first read about her in Judges 4-5 several decades ago, a scant four-verse sequence of events that includes a shockingly graphic act of violence.

Id always wondered what her motive was, since it isnt spelled out in the source material. So I made one up. (Its called fiction for a reason, folks.) But thanks to my recently acquired expertise with the source material, I believe I can claim that its entirely credible.

The larger narrative of Judges 4-5 depicts an unequal struggle with the Canaanite army because the sea people along the coast, a.k.a. the Philistines, have mastered the skills of ironworking, but are preventing this new and deadly technology from reaching the hill country of the Israelites, who have to make do with weaker, outdated weapons. (There is no way to confirm the historical accuracy of this claim based on the text alone, but it follows logically that the coastal traders would come in contact with a new technology like ironworking before the tribal clans of the rugged hill country.)

So the Israelites are at a technical disadvantage, outnumbered and outgunned, as it were: the army of King Jabin of Canaan can dispatch a force of 900 iron chariots against them. But the Israelites have some territorial advantage.

And some kickass women on their side.

Deborah isnt just a chieftain, shes also a prophet, for Gods sake, and she makes a prediction involving Yael.

How does it turn out? As you may have guessed, youll have to read the story to find out. (Theres this thing called dramatic suspense. Anyway)

Yaels story is told twice in Judges, once in relatively plain and direct prose, then more vividly in the Song of Deborahwhich, along with the Song of the Sea, led by Moses sister Miriam, are thought to be among the oldest texts in the Hebrew Bible. Scholars believe that these two examples of lyric poetry celebrating victory in war, both attributed to women, date from circa 1000 BCE, not too long after the events depicted in the Song of Deborah.

These women must have held pretty important positions among the Israelites. The Torah calls Miriam a prophetess; the text of Judges calls Deborah a prophetess and a chieftain.

And as for Yael: Wow. This is a gal you want on your side.

Cause you dont want to get on her bad side.

Jewish Noir IIis unique collection of twenty-three all-new stories (and one reprint) by Jewish and non-Jewish literary and genre writers, including numerous award-winning authors such as Gabriela Alemn, Doug Allyn, Rita Lakin, Rabbi Ilene Schneider, E.J. Wagner, and Kenneth Wishnia, with a foreword by MWA Grand Master Lawrence Block.

The stories in this collection include many teachable moments about the history of prejudice, and the contradictions of ethnic identity and assimilation into American society.

Link:

Kickass Women of the Hebrew Bible - Criminal Element

Who really is God? – The State Journal-Register

Posted By on August 29, 2022

What does it take for God to get your attention?To get you to understand just who God really is?Moses burning bush experience became the mere prelude for an obscure shepherd becoming a well-known servant of God!An experience designed to help Moses get to know who God really is!

One of the greatest problems facing people and the church today is their simply is not fully knowing and understanding who God is!Not understanding the meaning of I am that I am!

How do you convince someone to believe in a God that you dont really know?To trust a God that you dont really follow?What do you tell folk who might ask you who God is?What is your understanding about God?

What makes God different from all those other gods that people observe and worship?What does/can God do that other gods cant do?In Exodus 3:14, God speaks for himself!

In most languages, names of people, places and things are called nouns. Nouns refer to static entities.Nouns do not of themselves indicate action or life.But the name of God is not a noun. It is actually a verb a word that indicates action or a state of being.

In the Hebrew language, the word that is translated I am comes from the Hebrew verb hayah - to be, to breathe, to live, to exist. Its verb form in this verse indicates incompleted action - without beginning or ending. It literally means I am the being one!I am the living, existing one! I am not something static! Nor a figment of someones imagination!I am a self-active, self-sustaining being!I move, exist, live on my own!I be!I be whatever I choose to be, wherever I choose to be, whenever I choose to be, for whatever reason I choose to be, as long as I choose to be!

Another form of that same verb also has a causative quality.In that form, the verb, hayah also means to cause to be, to cause to live, to cause to exist!" That reality helps us understand that God is the living, being, existing one who also causes all other things to be and to exist!Even non-living things, static things: dirt, water, dust, air, stones kind of things.You name it - God created it!God is therefore the creator God!

In the Genesis record, man is the only creature that God breathed of himself into.Only man received the eternal breath of the Living, being God!

When God told Moses that his name was I am that I am, God was declaring that he was not a thing, but rather the source of all things!Living and non-living!Mobile and static!God is the God who bes and the God who causes all things to be!Nothing can exist except it begins and continues in the mind and will of God!Thats how God could say, Let there be!And it was!t started to be, and shall continue to be, until God should cause it not to be!

My being is a continuous reality! I am always in a continuous state of existence! No wonder Genesis 1:1 begins with the words In the beginning GOD ! When you think of God, you should think of something happening!God is a Happening being!Thus Gods name also indicates and reflects his nature!

People, places and things exist be - only for a given period of time.But Gods being, Gods existing has no beginning nor ending to it!Thats what the Lord God says about himself in Isaiah 41:4: I the Lord, the first, and the last, I am he.Revelation 1:8 echoes the same about Jesus, the son of God, I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.

When God told Moses that his name was I am that I am, God was declaring that he was not a thing, but rather the source of all things! Living and non-living!Moving and static!He is the God who bes and the God who causes all things to be!Nothing can exist except it begins and continues in the mind of God, who is the source of all that exists!

Knowing God is to begin knowing yourself!

Rev. Samuel W. Hale Jr. is the retired pastor of Zion Missionary Baptist Church.

Read the original post:

Who really is God? - The State Journal-Register

FROM THE ARCHIVE: Talking student debt, 50 years ago this week J. – The Jewish News of Northern California

Posted By on August 29, 2022

On Aug. 24, President Joe Biden announced that the federal government would cancel up to $20,000 in unpaid student loans for some debtors. Its a big step for a country with about $1.620 trillion outstanding in student loan debt to the government alone.

On Aug. 25, 1972, this paper was also talking about student loans. A special spread covering the 75th anniversary of the Hebrew Free Loan included a brief article dedicated to the fairly new concept of student loans.

The first student loans had been given out by Hebrew Free Loan eight years earlier, and the demand was high and growing:

From a modest beginning the student loans have burgeoned to the point where current student loan accounts receivable is at $110,000 a far cry from the $9,000 of 1964.

The maximum student loan was then $750, although you could apply for more than one.

At that time, the cost of attending a University of California was under $200 for California residents. Originally the University of California was free for locals; according to UC Berkeleys student newspaper, the Daily Californian, 1970 was the first year that fees were instituted: $150 per year for undergraduates and $180 per year for graduate students.

Today, tuition and fees come close to $19,500 for California residents (not including lodging or food costs).

The free loan group also called attention to the remarkable record of repayment by the student borrowers, the 1972 spread continued. In eight years, and with loans totalling $165,000, only one student loan of $110 had to be written off as a bad debt. This fact is all the more significant when contrasted with the recent report on the status of the federal government student loans showing more than 25 percent in uncollected loans outstanding.

Read the rest here:

FROM THE ARCHIVE: Talking student debt, 50 years ago this week J. - The Jewish News of Northern California

Berlin police are investigating whether charges can be filed against Abbas for Israel Holocausts comment – JTA News – Jewish Telegraphic Agency

Posted By on August 29, 2022

BERLIN (JTA) Berlin police are investigating Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas on suspicion that comments he made while on an official visit to Germany violated the countrys hate speech laws related to Holocaust relativization.

Mike Delberg, a member of the Berlin Jewish community and a social media manager for the center-right Christian Democratic Union Party, has filed charges, accusing Abbas of trivializing and relativizing the most terrible time in the history of our country and in the history of my family and faith community.

At issue are statements Abbas made during a press conference with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz last week, following their official diplomatic meeting. When asked about the legacy of the 1972 Munich Olympics murders which were carried out by terrorists affiliated with the Palestine Liberation Organization, a group that has ties to the Palestinian Authority Abbas accused Israel of committing 50 Holocausts since its founding. He later qualified his remarks, saying in a statement that the Holocaust was the most heinous crime in modern human history.

It is illegal in Germany to deny or relativize the Holocaust, but Abbas may be protected from prosecution by diplomatic immunity. According to the German criminal code, denial of genocidal acts committed during the National Socialist era is punishable by a fine or imprisonment of up to 5 years.

In an interview with Bild Live TV, Delberg said he hoped to accomplish nothing more or less than that Mr. Abbas be brought to justice as provided for in our law.

Berlin police confirmed to German media that they are looking into whether they can actually file charges.

Abbas statement caused a stir in part because Scholz, of the centrist Social Democratic Party, did not react on the spot. He later tweeted in English, German and Hebrew that he was disgusted by the outrageous remarks that Abbas had made.

I would have wanted a more direct reaction from our chancellor, Delberg said, not just an explanatory tweet or apology.

Others, including the Central Council of Jews in Germany and the Berlin-based International Auschwitz Committee, joined in criticizing Scholz for allowing Abbas comments on the Holocaust to go unchallenged.

According to Deutsche Welle, Germanys public media entity, Scholz spokesperson Steffen Hebestreit said that the chancellor regretted not responding directly to Abbas comments. The Scholz administration reportedly also summoned the head of the Palestinian diplomatic mission to Germany to formally condemn the Holocaust comparison.

The rest is here:

Berlin police are investigating whether charges can be filed against Abbas for Israel Holocausts comment - JTA News - Jewish Telegraphic Agency

The rashtrapatni row should make us rethink the everyday bias against women in our languages – Scroll.in

Posted By on August 29, 2022

During his Independence Day address on August 15, Prime Minister Narendra Modi emphasised that it was important that in speech and conduct we do nothing that lowers the dignity of women. He urged his fellow citizens to get rid of everything that insults women in our daily life, nature and culture. One wonders if this was in response to the controversy that erupted at the end of July over Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury referring to President Droupadi Murmu as rashtrapatni.

Days after Murmu made history as the first tribal woman to assume the highest constitutional office in India, she unwittingly became the centre of a slugfest between the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party and the Congress. BJP minister and Member of Parliament described Chowdhurys remark demeaning while Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said it was a deliberate sexist insult. Both houses of Parliament were adjourned amid heated debates and protests over the matter.

Chowdhury apologised to President Murmu stating that his use of the contentious word was a slip of tongue and a result of him not knowing Hindi. His remarks seemed to suggest that he was under the impression that the feminine form of the Hindi word for president, rashtrapati, was rashtrapatni wife of the nation. Chowdhurys explanation invoked the popular clich of an innocent Bengali gentlemans well-meaning, but horrendous mangling of the Hindi language.

Whether this defence was genuine or a shrewd manoeuvre, the fact remains that the ubiquity of gender in Hindi can often pose a challenge to non-native speakers. To those unfamiliar with the language, the categorisation of the Hindi word for chair (kursi) as feminine but bed (palang) as masculine can be baffling. Grammar conferring the masculine or feminine gender on inanimate objects is not unique to Hindi. French, Spanish and Hebrew to name a few also have gendered grammar.

For many, it is about time this changed.

Around the time Chowdhury committed the gender-based faux pas, the international media was reporting on some developments in the debate over gender-neutrality in Spanish. Over the past few years, activists in Latin America have sought to alter Spanish words in a bid to make them more inclusive. What began as a feminist movement to dissuade the use of generic masculine collective nouns has, over time, evolved into a broader exercise.

The alteration of Spanish nouns is intended to render them gender-neutral, eschewing the male and female identity to make space for those who do not conform to normative gender roles or identities. A common example of this is the replacing of the masculine O, the feminine A with a gender-neutral E, X or @.

Argentina, in particular, has been at the forefront of this language revolution with universities and judges using the gender-neutral form of words. Of course, it has not all been plain sailing. Such developments have invited the ire of the puritans and conservatives. The Royal Academy of Spain has referred to such modifications of Spanish words as being alien to the morphology of Spanish.

A few weeks ago, the city government of Buenos Aires, the capital city of Argentina, imposed an unprecedented ban on teachers using gender-neutral words during class. The legality of the ban has been challenged in court and is sure to set an intriguing precedent.

A similar script has been playing out across the Atlantic. In October 2021, a French dictionary recognised the freshly-minted pronoun (iel) as a gender-inclusive alternative to the prevalent male (il) and female (elle) terms.

This seemingly innocuous addition to the French lexicon triggered a discourse mirroring the one taking place in the Spanish-speaking world. Traditionalists decried the move and the erstwhile French Education Minister Jean-Michel Blanquer had ominously stated that, inclusive writing is not the future of the French language.

Even millennia-old Hebrew has not been immune to the winds of change. Like Hindi, Hebrew too is gendered with objects being prescribed masculine or feminine nouns. Now, activists are trying to make the language more inclusive by adding new characters into the Hebrew alphabet.

When it comes to English, pronouns have been the focus for gender-inclusive advocacy. While scrolling through social media, one is bound to encounter instances of people expressing their preferred pronouns: he/him and she/her are self-evident, with they/them becoming the popular pronoun of choice for gender non-conforming people.

Inevitably, some have argued that the use of a collective pronoun to refer to an individual is cumbersome and inelegant, but such protests ring hollow in the face of history. In truth, the pronoun they has been used in the past to refer to singular subjects and is still used to refer to a single individual whose gender may be unknown. Interestingly, it is the pronoun you whose use in the singular is now considered natural, which was once used only in the plural sense hence, the you are as opposed to the you is).

But put aside the antecedents of these terms for a moment. Let us assume that the use of they as a singular pronoun is an innovation and a wholly novel twist to the English language. Is that sufficient to proclaim it as unacceptable?

Languages, like civilisations and people, are meant to evolve. For those who have been battling for countless years to carve an identity in this world, the words that denote such identity are pivotal. Claiming space in ones language, therefore, can be a key step to claiming space in ones society. Is that not reason enough to shun the pedantic rules of grammar to usher in change?

As this linguo-cultural revolution sweeps across the world, Chowdhurys use of the term rashtrapatni can serve as a moment of introspection for everyone. If one were to ignore the politics, this row laid bare the gendering that pervades Hindi after all, the term rashtrapati is inherently masculine and assumes the holder of such office to be male.

Modis call for gender equality is a commendable message but perhaps it is time to go beyond merely condemning the use of inappropriate language. Perhaps, it is time we delved deeper to rectify the biases upon which language is constructed.

As a young nation striding into the future, we must do all we can to preserve the fundamental principles of inclusivity and equality upon which the state was founded. An important step towards this ideal would be to ensure that our language, and through it our society, evolves to reflect these values.

Rohan Banerjee is a lawyer in Mumbai.

Also read: Rashtrapatni row is a reminder of the sexist roots of language and a suggestion by Bal Thackeray

Read more:

The rashtrapatni row should make us rethink the everyday bias against women in our languages - Scroll.in

The Jewish and intellectual origins of this famously non-Jewish Jew – JNS.org

Posted By on August 29, 2022

(August 25, 2022 / Jewish Journal) Editors note: Excerpted from the new three-volume set, Theodor Herzl: Zionist Writings, the inaugural publication of The Library of the Jewish People edited by Gil Troy, to be published this August marking the 125th anniversary of the First Zionist Congress. This is the second article in a series. The first in the series is available here.

Theodor Herzl was born on May 2, 1860, in Pest, Hungary, across the River Danube from Buda. The second child and only son of a successful businessman, Jakob, he was raised to fit in to the elegant, sophisticated society his family and a fraction of his people had fought so hard to enter. But it is too easy to caricature his upbringing as fully emancipated and assimilated.

His paternal grandfather, Simon Loeb Herzl, came from Semlin, todays Zemun, now incorporated into Belgrade. There, Simon befriended Rabbi Judah ben Solomon Chai Alkalai. This prominent Sephardic leader was an early Zionist, scarred by the crude anti-Semitism of the Damascus Blood Libel of 1840, inspired by the old-new Greek War of Independence in the 1820sand energized by the spiritual and agricultural possibilities of returning the Jews to their natural habitat, their homeland in the Land of Israel. It is plausible that the grandfather conveyed some of those ideas, some of that excitement, to his grandson.

Still, the move from Semlin to Budapest, from poverty to wealth, from intense Jewish living in the ghetto to emancipated European ways in the city, placed the Herzl family at the intersection of many of his eras defining currents.

The 1800s were years of changeand of isms. Creative ideas erupted amid the disruptions of industrialization, urbanization and capitalism. Three defining ideologies were rationalism, liberalism and nationalismwith each one shaping the next. The Age of Reason, the Enlightenmentscience itselfrose thanks to rationalism. Life was no longer organized around believing in God and serving your king, but following logic, facts, objective truth. The logic of reason flowed naturally to liberalism, an expansive political ideology rooted in recognizing every individuals inherent rights. Finally, as polities became less God-and-king-centered, nationalism filled in the God-sized hole in many peoples hearts. Individuals bonded based on their common heritage, language, ethnicity, or regional prideand needs.

Subscribe to The JNS Daily Syndicateby email and never missour top stories

Ideas are not static. In an ideological age rippling with such dramatic changes, the different isms kept colliding and fusing, like atoms becoming molecular compounds. Some combinations proved more stableand constructivethan others.

Liberalism combined with nationalism created Americanism, the democratic model wherein individual rights flourished in a collective context yielding the liberal-democratic nation-state. An offshoot of liberalism emphasizing equality more than rights fused with rationalism and created Marxism, although Karl Marx admitted his theories could only be enacted with irrational terror. Marxism with that violent streak, drained of liberalism, became communism, while a hyper-nationalism, rooted in blood-and-soil loyalty, and the kind of Marxist rationalism and totalitarianism also drained of any liberalism, created Nazism.

A similar impressionistic summary of the Jewish experience would track how the nineteenth centurys ideological clashes shaped the major movements and institutions still defining Judaism, from the Reform movement to Zionism, from the modern synagogue to the State of Israel. Judaism and rationalism set off the explosion of scholarshipthe Wissenschaftwhile Judaism mixed with liberalism triggered the Reform and Conservative movements theological inventiveness. In response, ultra-Orthodoxy emerged, hostile to changeessentially subtracting liberalism from Judaism. Modern Orthodoxy synthesized, accepting some liberalism in Judaism and eventually Jewish nationalism without too much rationalism. And, thanks to Herzl and others, the compound of Judaism and liberalism and nationalism yielded Zionism.

The actual historical process was much messier. It began with the great double-edged sword of European Emancipation. First in the West, then in the East, some Europeans welcomed Jews with equal rights and extraordinary opportunities, liberating many to move to the citiesand for a few to succeed on legendary scales. Moses Mendelssohn (17291786), the Herzl of the HaskalaEnlightenmentwas a Jew who as a philosopher dazzled Berlin. But, unlike Herzl, Mendelssohn was so fluent in Judaism and Hebrew that in 1783 he started translating much of the Bible into High German, adding commentary sporadically too. Mendelssohn epitomized the Haskala ideal of being a full, functioning, literate Jew in the house and a full, functioning, popular man on the street. And, unlike Herzl, Mendelssohn was ugly, infamously so, a walking ghetto stereotype with his crooked back and hooked nose.

Mendelssohn was accepted. Jews, however, realized that Europes embrace often came at a cost: Jews had to be willing to give up their Jewishness, to fit in so much that many lost their way. Mendelssohn had six children who survived into adulthoodonly two remained Jewish. Most disturbing, the Jewish rush into modern European society triggered a backlash, an updated, racist Jew-hatred that became increasingly potent as nationalist demagogues blamed the eras problems on Europes traditional scapegoat, the Jews.

Rather than being welcomed smoothly into European life, most Jews felt mugged by modernity. The complex realities never matched the euphoric hopes of themaskilim, the Enlightened Reformers, that their people would awake from their ghetto-imposed long slumber, as the Russian-JewishmaskilY. L. Gordon would write in Hebrew in 1866.

Developing Mendelssohns vision as the pioneering Jewish modernizer, Gordon celebrated the essential bargain Jews like Theodor and his parents accepted. The deal was: Be a man when you wander outside and a Jew when at home. In Herzls householdlike so many other bourgeois Jewish homesthe success in looking normal on the streets came at a high Jewish cost, even at home.

For Herzl and his family, Middle European Jews caught in the middle, every educational choice became a marker. Were you looking backward to your traditional past or forward to your enlightened future? Initially, Herzls parents, Jakob and Jeannette ne Diamant, tried doing both. When their son was eight days old, they initiated their son Theodor into the great identity juggle by giving him a Hebrew nameBinyamin Zeev.

Ultimately, then, Binyamin Zeev Herzl was far more rooted in Judaismand the Jewish struggle of the nineteenth century, than most legends acknowledge.

Professor Gil Troy is the author of The Zionist Ideas and the editor of the three-volume set Theodor Herzl: Zionist Writings, the inaugural publication of the Library of the Jewish People, to be published this August marking the 125th anniversary of the First Zionist Congress.

This article was originally published byThe Jewish Journal.

Read more:

The Jewish and intellectual origins of this famously non-Jewish Jew - JNS.org


Page 245«..1020..244245246247..250260..»

matomo tracker