Page 250«..1020..249250251252..260270..»

Jewish practices and customs in the U.S. | Pew Research Center

Posted By on August 22, 2022

Jewish Americans are not a highly religious group, at least by traditional measures of religious observance. But many engage with Judaism in some way, whether through holidays, food choices, cultural connections or life milestones.

For instance, roughly seven-in-ten Jews say they often or sometimes cook or eat traditional Jewish foods, making this the most common form of engagement with Jewish life among a wide range of practices and activities measured in the survey. And six-in-ten say they at least sometimes share Jewish culture and holidays with non-Jewish friends, that they held or attended a Seder last Passover, or that they observed a Jewish ritual to mark a lifecycle milestone (like a bar or bat mitzvah) in the past year.

Just one-in-five U.S. Jews say they attend religious services at a synagogue, temple, minyan or havurah at least once or twice a month, compared with twice as many (39%) who say they often or sometimes mark Shabbat in a way that is personally meaningful to them.

When Jews who do not attend religious services regularly are asked why they dont attend more often, the most commonly offered response is Im not religious. A slightly smaller majority cite lack of interest as a reason for not attending more often, and more than half of non-attenders say they express their Jewishness in other ways. Among Jews who do attend religious services regularly, about nine-in-ten say they do so because they find it spiritually meaningful.

This chapter explores these and other questions about participation in Jewish life in more detail.

Six-in-ten U.S. Jews say they held or participated in a Seder in the year prior to the survey, and a similar share say they attended a ritual to mark a lifecycle passage or milestone, such as a bar mitzvah or bat mitzvah. Somewhat fewer (46%) say they fasted all or part of Yom Kippur.

Respondents who are Jewish by religion are far more inclined than Jews of no religion to participate in these kinds of activities. And Jews with spouses who are also Jewish are more likely than intermarried respondents to have taken part in a Seder, fasted on Yom Kippur and gone to a ritual like a bar or bat mitzvah in the past year.

Jews under the age of 50 are less likely than older Jews to have participated in rituals to mark life cycle milestones. But the youngest Jewish adults (under age 30) are more likely than the oldest Jewish adults to have fasted on Yom Kippur. (Those who cannot fast for health reasons are not obligated to do so.)

Orthodox Jews are more likely than those in other streams (or in no particular branch) of U.S. Judaism to have participated in a Seder, fasted on Yom Kippur, and engaged in a Jewish ritual to mark a life milestone.

Four-in-ten U.S. Jews say they often (20%) or sometimes (19%) mark Shabbat in a way that is meaningful to them. For some this might include traditional practices like resting, attending religious services or lighting candles. For others, it might involve gathering with friends or doing community service.

As with so many other forms of participation in Jewish life, marking Shabbat in a personally meaningful way is much more common among Jews by religion than among Jews of no religion. It also is more common among in-married Jews (marriages between people of the same religion) than among those who are married to non-Jewish spouses. And it is most common among Orthodox Jews and least common among those with no denominational ties.

The survey included a variety of questions that asked respondents how they engage with Jewish culture. About seven-in-ten U.S. Jews say they often or sometimes cook or eat Jewish foods, making this the most common form of participation in Jewish culture asked about in the study. Six-in-ten say they at least sometimes share Jewish culture and holidays with non-Jewish friends. And most U.S. Jews (57%) also say they visit historical Jewish sites when they travel.

Smaller shares report often or sometimes reading Jewish literature, history or biographies (44%), watching television with Jewish or Israeli themes (43%), reading Jewish news in print or online (42%), or listening to Jewish or Israeli music (36%). One-quarter of U.S. Jews say they go to Jewish film festivals or seek out Jewish films at least sometimes, and 17% say they participate in online conversations about Judaism or being Jewish.

Watching television with Jewish themes and seeking out Jewish films and film festivals is more common among older Jews (ages 50 and older) than among younger Jewish adults. On the other questions, however, the differences between older and younger Jews tend to be modest.

Orthodox Jews are more likely than those who belong to other branches or streams of American Judaism to say they regularly cook or eat Jewish foods, visit Jewish historical sites, read Jewish news and literature, and listen to Jewish music. Jewish television and films, by contrast, factor much less prominently in Orthodox Jewish life; Orthodox Jews are less likely than both Conservative and Reform Jews to say they often or sometimes watch television with Jewish themes.

The survey also asked respondents to describe in their own words anything else they do that makes them feel connected with Jews and Judaism; see topline for results.

Three-in-ten Jews say they often or sometimes engage in political activism as an expression of their Jewishness. This is especially common among those who identify with Conservative Judaism (45%).

Engaging in political activism as an expression of Jewishness is about equally as common among Jews who identify with or lean toward the Republican Party (28% of whom say they at least sometimes engage in political activism as an expression of Jewishness) as it is among Jewish Democrats and those who lean Democratic (31%).

Fewer than one-in-five U.S. Jews (17%) say they keep kosher in their home, including 14% who say they separate meat and dairy and 3% who say they are vegetarian or vegan.

Keeping kosher is nearly ubiquitous in Orthodox homes: Fully 95% of Orthodox Jews in the survey say they keep kosher. About one-quarter of Conservative Jews (24%) say they keep kosher in their home. And among Reform Jews and those with no denominational association, roughly one-in-twenty say they keep kosher in their home (5% among Reform Jews, 6% among those unaffiliated with any particular branch of Judaism).

Eight-in-ten U.S. Jews say they own a menorah, a candelabra used to mark the eight days of Hanukkah. Nearly two-thirds own a mezuzah, which is a parchment containing scripture passages typically affixed to the doorposts in Jewish homes. Six-in-ten U.S. Jews say they own a Hebrew-language siddur (Jewish prayer book), and 56% say they have a Seder plate designed to hold the six symbolic foods associated with the Passover meal.

Jewish people who are married to Jewish spouses are more likely than intermarried Jews to own these examples of Judaica. The same is true of those who identify with an institutional stream of Judaism (especially Orthodox Jews), compared with those who identify with no particular branch.

Overall, 16% of U.S. Jewish adults say they often or sometimes participate in activities or services with Chabad, an Orthodox Jewish movement and organization that offers programs and services to Jews throughout the U.S. and the world. This includes 5% who say they often do this and 12% who sometimes participate in Chabad activities. One-in-five Jewish adults (21%) say they rarely participate in activities or services with Chabad, and 62% say they never do.

What are the characteristics of those who regularly engage with Chabad? The vast majority identify as Jewish by religion (90%) as opposed to Jews of no religion (10%). The age structure of those who participate with Chabad is very similar to the age structure of those who do not. Chabad participants are more likely than other Jews to have a Jewish spouse, and they have lower levels of education, on average, than Jews who do not participate in Chabad activities.

One-quarter of Chabad participants are Orthodox Jews (24%), and another quarter identify with Conservative Judaism (26%) both much higher than the shares of Orthodox (5%) and Conservative (15%) Jews among those who rarely or never take part in Chabad events. But about half of Chabad participants are from other streams or dont affiliate with any particular branch of Judaism, perhaps reflecting Chabads outreach toward less observant Jews.

One-in-five U.S. Jews say they attend services at a synagogue, temple, minyan or havurah at least once or twice a month, including 12% who go weekly or more often. One-quarter (27%) say they attend a few times a year, such as for High Holidays. And half of U.S. Jews (including roughly nine-in-ten Jews of no religion) say they seldom or never attend Jewish religious services.

Monthly attendance at Jewish religious services is equally common among Jewish men (20%) and women (21%), and roughly equivalent among younger Jews and older Jews. Those who are married to a Jewish spouse attend Jewish religious services at much higher rates (36% at least monthly) compared with those who are married to a non-Jewish spouse (5%) or who are not married (16%).

Eight-in-ten Orthodox Jews say they attend Jewish religious services at least once or twice a month, including 73% who do so at least once a week. Worship attendance is less common among Conservative and Reform Jews, though most Conservative Jews and about half of Reform Jews attend at least a few times a year. Among Jews who have no particular denominational affiliation, about nine-in-ten (88%) seldom or never attend Jewish religious services.

Jewish Americans are less likely than U.S. adults overall to attend religious services regularly. One-in-five Jews say they attend a synagogue at least once per month, compared with about one-third of U.S. adults who say they attend religious services as often. However, Jews are more likely to say they go to religious services a few times a year (such as for High Holidays) than Americans overall (27% vs. 15%). Half of Jewish adults say they seldom or never go to synagogue, similar to the share of adults in the overall public who say they seldom (24%) or never (26%) go to church or other religious services.

About one-third of U.S. Jews (35%) say they live in a household where someone is a formal member of a synagogue. This includes 46% of Jews by religion, compared with 5% of Jews of no religion.

Roughly nine-in-ten Orthodox Jewish respondents (93%) live in households where someone is a member of a synagogue, as do 56% of those associated with the Conservative movement. Fewer Reform Jews (37%) say they or someone else in their household belongs to a synagogue, and just 7% of Jews with no denominational affiliation say this.

Synagogue membership peaks at 43% among Jews in households with annual incomes of $200,000 or more. By contrast, one-quarter of Jews whose family income is less than $50,000 say that someone in the household is a synagogue member. Among U.S. Jews who attend synagogue a few times a year or less, 17% say cost is a reason they do not attend more often.

Because Pew Research Centers 2013 survey was conducted by phone and the 2020 survey was conducted by mail and online, the results on synagogue attendance and membership are not directly comparable. A 2020 experiment (see Appendix B) indicates that Jewish Americans, like U.S. adults in general, tend to report higher levels of attendance at religious services when speaking with a live interviewer on the phone than they do when writing their answers in private. (Social scientists attribute this primarily to social desirability bias, the often unconscious desire to give answers that other people will like or expect.) In the case of synagogue attendance and membership, this means that any apparent change from 2013 to 2020 may be attributable to methodological differences between the two surveys rather than to real changes in behavior.

The survey asked Jews who attend religious services a few times a year or less (including those who never attend) whether each of a number of possible factors is a reason why they do not go more often. Respondents could select multiple reasons, indicating all that apply to them. The most common answer was Im not religious, which two-thirds (including 86% of Jews of no religion) cite as a reason they do not regularly attend Jewish religious services. More than half say they are just not interested or that they express their Jewishness in other ways.

Roughly one-quarter of U.S. Jews (23%) say they do not attend services regularly because they do not know enough to participate, and 17% cite cost as a factor that keeps them away. And one-in-ten say they do not attend synagogue regularly either because they dont feel welcome (7%) or because people treat them like they dont belong (4%). Roughly one-in-ten or fewer say there are no nearby congregations for them to attend, that when they go they feel pressured to do more or donate more than they are comfortable with, that they fear for their security at synagogue, or that their poor health or limited mobility makes it difficult for them to attend.

Younger Jews are more likely than their elders to say that a lack of knowledge about how to participate keeps them away from Jewish religious services. Jews under age 50 also are significantly more apt than those who are older to say they are just not interested in attending religious services. At the same time, Jews under age 30 are less likely than older Jews to cite cost as a factor keeping them away from religious services.

Compared with Conservative and Reform Jews who do not attend religious services regularly, those who dont affiliate with any particular branch or stream of U.S. Judaism are more inclined to cite lack of religiousness and lack of interest as factors. By contrast, Conservative and Reform Jews who attend infrequently are more likely than those with no denominational affiliation to say they express their Jewishness in other ways and to cite cost as an explanation for why they do not attend religious services.

Roughly one-in-five Jews with family incomes of less than $50,000 cite cost as a reason they do not attend religious services more often, which is not significantly different than the 15% of Jews with household incomes above $200,000 who say this.

Some Jewish community leaders have wondered whether intermarried Jews, Jews of diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds, and Jews who have family members from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds might avoid synagogues because they do not feel welcome. The survey finds that 8% of intermarried Jews who rarely or never attend religious services say it is because they dont feel welcome, virtually identical to the 7% of in-married Jews who say this. But Jews who live in households with at least one non-White person (including possibly the respondent) are somewhat more likely than Jews in households where everyone is White to cite an unwelcoming atmosphere as a reason for not attending religious services (11% vs. 6%). The survey did not include enough interviews with Jewish adults who identify as Hispanic, Black, Asian, some other race or multiracial to reliably report their views, either as separate racial/ethnic groups or even in aggregate (as all non-White respondents combined).

More than half of U.S. Jews who attend religious services a few times a year or less often say that one of the reasons they do not go more is that they express their Jewishness in other ways, making this one of the most commonly cited reasons for not attending religious services. This raises the question: How if at all does this group express Jewishness in other ways?

The survey finds that, among Jews who attend a few times a year or less, those who give this response are more engaged in Jewish life on a variety of measures than those who do not say its because they express their Jewishness in other ways. For example, 74% of non-attenders who say they express their Jewishness in other ways report often or sometimes sharing Jewish culture and holidays with non-Jewish friends, and 63% held or attended a Seder last year. By contrast, among non-attenders who do not give this explanation for why they do not go to religious services, the comparable figures are 44% and 47%, respectively.

The survey also shows, however, that non-attenders who say they do not go to religious services because they express their Jewishness in other ways are consistently less engaged in Jewish life than are Jews who do attend religious services at least once or twice a month.

The survey also asked the 20% of U.S. Jews who do attend religious services at least once or twice a month about their reasons for doing so. Within this group, fully 92% say they do so because they find it spiritually meaningful, while 87% point to the sense of belonging they derive and 83% cite a connection to their ancestry and history. Smaller majorities say continuing their familys traditions (74%), learning something new (69%), feeling a sense of religious obligation (65%) or socializing (62%) are factors in why they attend regularly.

Fewer than half say they attend primarily because of their family, spouse or partner (42%) or because they would feel guilty if they didnt (22%).

Jewish men are more likely than women to say they attend religious services regularly out of a sense of obligation, while Jewish women are a bit more likely than men to say they go to see friends and socialize. Orthodox Jews are more apt than other Jews to cite continuing family traditions and a sense of obligation as reasons for their frequent religious attendance. By contrast, non-Orthodox Jews more commonly cite the knowledge they gain and the opportunity to socialize as reasons they regularly attend religious services.

Even before COVID-19 led synagogues to shut their sanctuaries, non-Orthodox Jews in America hadnt been flocking to weekly Shabbat services. Most go to services just a few times a year at most, and fewer than half are members of a synagogue, according to Pew Research Centers 2020 survey of American Jews, conducted mostly prior to the coronavirus outbreak. To provide another window into some of the changes occurring in American Jewish life, Pew Research Center conducted a series of in-depth interviews with rabbis and other Jewish leaders. These conversations were separate from the survey of U.S. Jews. Although the interviewees were not selected in a scientific manner, and hence are not representative of Jewish leaders overall, we sought a diversity of viewpoints and have tried to convey them impartially, without taking sides or promoting any positions, policies or outcomes.

To provide another window into some of the changes occurring in American Jewish life, Pew Research Center conducted a series of in-depth interviews with rabbis and other Jewish leaders. These conversations were separate from the survey of U.S. Jews. Although the interviewees were not selected in a scientific manner, and hence are not representative of Jewish leaders overall, we sought a diversity of viewpoints and have tried to convey them impartially, without taking sides or promoting any positions, policies or outcomes.

In a series of in-depth interviews separate from the survey itself, nearly three dozen rabbis and Jewish community leaders described their efforts to increase engagement in Jewish life. Many have concluded that, in the 21st century, they cannot assume Jewish families will join a synagogue or be active in one out of obligation. Instead, they think synagogues and other Jewish organizations need to come up with new and unconventional ways to engage with Jews who dont go to religious services, cant read Hebrew and have varying levels of Jewish education.

People today are looking to Jewish institutions to satisfy them where they are, said Rabbi Howard Stecker of Temple Israel in Great Neck, a Conservative synagogue in Long Island, New York. People are looking to find something thats meaningful in their lives. If a synagogue can provide it is nimble enough then people will respond to the extent that their needs are being satisfied. But the idea that you support a synagogue just because thats the right thing to do seems to be fading over time in the 20-plus years that Ive been a rabbi.

The 2013 Pew Research Center survey pointed to the growth of Jews of no religion, particularly among young Jewish adults an echo, in Jewish life, of the rise of the nones in American religious life more broadly. The 2020 study finds that among Jews who go to synagogue no more than a few times a year, roughly half (55%) say they have other ways of expressing their Jewishness. Many cite multiple, overlapping reasons for not going to a synagogue: Two-thirds say they arent religious, 57% say they are just not interested in religious services, and nearly a quarter (23%) say they dont know enough to participate.

Many of the rabbis interviewed are attempting various experiments some rather modest, others more ambitious designed to make Jews more comfortable in religious settings. For example, Rabbi Ron Fish of Temple Israel in Sharon, Massachusetts, said that for Jews disinclined to attend traditional services, his synagogue has a monthly Shabbat service that includes drumming and meditation. And, on the second day of Rosh Hashanah each year, it has offered an outdoor service Rosh Hashanah in the Woods, billed as a Rosh Hashanah experience where we can be ourselves, pray differently, relate to God, and reach within to access a spiritual dimension not always attainable in a sanctuary.

Another approach is to lead religious discussions at a local bar, often under a cheeky moniker such as Torah on Tap. I meet them in their environment, said Rabbi Mark Mallach, rabbi emeritus of Temple Beth Ahm Yisrael in Springfield, New Jersey. I pay for the first round. I try to come up with discussion topics relevant to them.

Besides synagogues, many other organizations are trying to draw in young Jewish adults, families with children, intermarried couples, and other hard-to-reach segments of the population. The list of new organizations is long, as major donors to Jewish causes increasingly are funding nonprofits that foster engagement with Jewish life in specific ways. In Giving Jewish: How Big Funders Have Transformed American Jewish Philanthropy, Jack Wertheimer, professor of American Jewish History at the Jewish Theological Seminary, describes a decades-long shift in patterns of charitable giving. Whereas in the mid-to-late 20th century big donors tended to give to umbrella organizations such as Jewish Federations and UJA (United Jewish Appeal) campaigns and to causes such as supporting Israeli institutions, Wertheimer writes, the more recent trend, starting in the 1990s, has been to fund specific initiatives to increase Jewish engagement (i.e., activities that bring the least involved Jews to episodic gatherings of a Jewish flavor) and to build Jewish identity. He estimates that the top 250 Jewish foundations together give grants totaling $900 million to $1 billion per year for Jewish purposes.

Some of these spiritual startups have benefitted from seed capital and training provided by incubator organizations like UpStart, which distributes roughly $1.5 million a year in grants, according to Aaron Katler, UpStarts chief executive officer.

Among the nonprofits that have grown rapidly in recent years: Moishe House, founded in Oakland, California, in 2006, helps Jews in their 20s form strong communities. Limmud, founded in the UK in the 1980s, expanded internationally in 1999 and now organizes festivals, workshops and other events fostering Jewish learning around the world. PJ Library began free distribution of Jewish childrens books in 2005 and now distributes works by authors and illustrators in multiple languages in more than 30 countries. The Jewish Emergent Network was founded in 2014 by rabbis of seven unaffiliated communities (including IKAR in Los Angeles and Sixth & I in Washington) to share ideas and build on their respective successes in attracting unaffiliated and disengaged Jews to a rich and meaningful Jewish practice. And Hazon, a newly reinvigorated nonprofit that traces its roots back to the Jewish Working Girls Vacation Society in 1893, fosters environmental sustainability.

Another recent example is OneTable, which brings together Jews in their 20s and 30s for Shabbat dinners at peoples homes. Anyone in that age range (except for college students) can apply on OneTables website to host Shabbat dinners or can select among a list of Shabbat dinners being hosted in their area. OneTable, with financial support from Jewish foundations, subsidizes each dinner with $10 per attendee, up to $100.

In 2019, OneTable funded around 9,000 Shabbat meals in more than 400 cities across the United States, with a total of 109,000 people participating (including repeaters), said Aliza Kline, its chief executive officer. In her view, the numbers prove that young American Jews are open to religious experiences outside of synagogue settings. This generation is less engaged institutionally than other generations, but that doesnt mean theyre not spiritually connected. This is a DIY ritual by design, and that really fits with how people are connecting with their culture, their traditions, Kline said.

Yet alongside these and many other growing organizations, there are plenty of Jewish spiritual startups that have failed to catch on, as well as older organizations that have been losing ground, like the once-flourishing NJOP (National Jewish Outreach Program), which for more than 30 years has funded programs to teach Jews to read Hebrew and to celebrate Shabbat at a synagogue. More than 250,000 Jews have studied Hebrew through the program, and more than 1 million have attended its Shabbat Across America and Canada program, said Rabbi Ephraim Buchwald, NJOPs director.

But attendance has declined dramatically at both of these synagogue-based programs over the last 15 years, Buchwald said. Even before the pandemic, enrollment in the Hebrew programs had dropped to around 4,000 a year from 10,000, and Shabbat Across America and Canada drew around 20,000 annually, down from 80,000. People just stopped responding, so the numbers of people that weve been teaching has dropped precipitously I think because the young people are not interested in these types of programs, Buchwald said. Theyre not interested in coming to a synagogue.

Some rabbis said the American Jewish community seems less cohesive now than just a few decades ago, when the memory of the Holocaust was more fresh, Israel was widely viewed as an underdog in its conflict with surrounding Arab states, and support for Soviet Jews galvanized Jewish communities. Paradoxically, Jewish religious institutions may also be a victim of the success Jews have had in integrating into American society: There has been a blurring of the lines between Jewish and non-Jewish identity, and Jews are less likely to depend on synagogues for their social circles than was the case decades ago, according to the rabbis.

In the past, membership was more of a given, said Rabbi Angela Buchdahl of Central Synagogue in New York City. People felt they had to join a synagogue in order to belong and affiliate. Now I would say, theres a lot more do-it-yourself Judaism and internet Judaism and virtual Judaism.

The price of membership, often a few thousand dollars a year, also can keep people from joining a synagogue, the rabbis said. In recent years, a small number of synagogues have done away with traditional dues structures, hoping to remove a barrier to membership. As of 2017, more than 60 synagogues across the country had eliminated mandatory dues, according to a national study conducted by the UJA Federation of New York. The study noted that these synagogues generally say their decisions led to membership increases, but that financial contributions per household also tend to be lower than before.

Rabbi Jay Siegel of Congregation Beth Shalom in Santa Clarita, California, said the voluntary dues structure instituted there in 2014 helped attract and retain members. It created a very low barrier for membership, which was great because you had people who could participate that, under the classic dues structure, it might have been prohibitive. And it removed some of the uncomfortable conversations. People hated being asked for money.

One Jewish place of worship that never had a traditional, dues-based membership structure is Sixth & I, a synagogue and cultural center in Washington, D.C. Its senior rabbi, Shira Stutman, said Sixth & I caters mainly to people in their 20s and 30s, a group that she feels has been underserved by traditional synagogues, which tend to be family-centered. For its budget, the synagogue relies on a group of major donors, institutional funders and more than 3,000 individuals who give money at least annually. In addition, it asks visitors to pay to attend its arts and cultural events, social activities, religious classes, and meals after Shabbat services. In a typical year prior to the coronavirus pandemic, the synagogue drew about 80,000 paying visitors; in 2020, it shifted to mostly online events, which brought in similar numbers of participants but lower revenues, she said.

People will pay for things that they think are meaningful to them if you give them something quality, Stutman said. Many of these kids are spending $18 on one cocktail in a bar. If they can spend $18 on a cocktail, they can spend $18 for a class.

A much different approach to engagement is taken by Chabad-Lubavitch, a Brooklyn-based organization with Hasidic origins in Russia and Poland that sends emissaries (shlichim) to the far corners of the globe and attracts many non-Orthodox Jews even though its leaders are Haredi (ultra-Orthodox). Chabad synagogues dont have membership dues. Instead, they seek donations from Jews who go to their adult-education classes, attend their services and holiday celebrations, and have Shabbat dinners at their rabbis homes, which sometimes may double as synagogues, said Rabbi Motti Seligson, a spokesman for Chabad-Lubavitch.

Overall, 16% of American Jews say they participate in Chabad activities or services either often (5%) or sometimes (12%), according to the 2020 survey. About half of those participants identify as Reform or Conservative Jews. Seligson said Chabads approach allows Jews to form meaningful personal connections with rabbis more easily than is generally the case at larger synagogues.

You may first meet the rabbi for coffee and start a weekly class, and maybe youll be over with your family for a Shabbat diner at the rabbis home a number of times, he said. That may all be before you begin attending synagogue. You may not even feel comfortable going to the synagogue part of this community, but youll still be part of the community and still be embraced.

Excerpt from:
Jewish practices and customs in the U.S. | Pew Research Center

What You Should Know About NJ’s School Supply Tax Holiday This Week – catcountry1073.com

Posted By on August 22, 2022

Rarely will you ever hear the words "New Jersey" and "sales tax" mentioned in a sentence together that doesn't have a negative connotation to go right along with it.

Let's face it, when it comes to the taxes we pay here in the Garden State, they're anything but cheap. Still, that's the price we pay to live where we do. If we don't like it, there's not much we can do about it, right? Well, besides maybe move out of state.

New Jersey, on average, has about a 6.6% sales tax on goods. Parents in the Garden State, however, can presently enjoy a bit of a break from that tax when purchasing new school supplies for the upcoming school year. Before you ask, no, this is not fake news.

The Back-To-School Sales Tax Holiday is very real and, believe it or not, kicks off right before the start of the new school year. Let's start off with the good news.

Per the state's official website, thesales tax holiday begins on Saturday, August 27th and lasts through Monday, September 5th. The idea is to make back-to-school shopping a bit more afforable this year for average New Jersey residents. Everything from writing utensils, art supplies, and even computers under $3k are included in the sales tax suspension. With inflation making it difficult on so many people to afford even the bare minimum, this break will make it possible for struggling parents to get their kids what they need in time for the first day of school.

Now, for the bad news....

No doubt that by now many parents have already completed their back-to-school shopping for fear of bare shelves. With all the supply chain issues facing the country lately, many parents ordered their kids' school supplies weeks, if not months ago. Sure, the tax holiday is a great idea in theory, but with so many empty shelves, there's no guarantee parents who've waited until now to start shopping will be able to pick up everything their kids need in time for school.

Still, no one's going to complain about saving a bit of money, right?

Everything you need to know about the approaching back-to-school sales tax holiday can be found HERE.

Source: NJ.gov

New Jersey's Latest School Rankings

Just which days NJ schools have off remains a reflection of its community. Some New Jersey towns now have populations that celebrate religious holidays not previously taken as a district-wide day, such as Diwali or Eid. Other days off are not religious in nature, but are still stirring up controversy or buzz around the state. The following have been making the most news, heading into the 2022-2023 school year.

The lists below show 4-year graduation rates for New Jersey public schools for the 2020-21 school year. The statewide graduation rate fell slightly, from 91% in 2019-20 to 90.6%.

The lists, which are sorted by county and include a separate list for charter schools, also include a second graduation rate, which excludes students whose special education IEPs allow them to qualify for diplomas despite not meeting typical coursework and attendance requirements.

Columns with an asterisk or 'N' indicate there was no data or it was suppressed to protect student privacy.

Read more from the original source:
What You Should Know About NJ's School Supply Tax Holiday This Week - catcountry1073.com

Second man charged in armed carjacking of rabbi in Solon – cleveland.com

Posted By on August 22, 2022

SOLON, Ohio Authorities arrested a second man in connection with the armed carjacking of a 62-year-old rabbi earlier this month.

Donteze Congress, 18, of Maple Heights is charged with aggravated robbery in Bedford Municipal Court. He is being held in the Cuyahoga County Jail on $100,000 bond.

Another man, Thomas Donegan Williams, also 18 of Maple Heights, is also charged in connection with the Aug. 9 robbery of the Beachwood rabbi. Williams is charged in federal court in Cleveland with carjacking and using a gun during a violent crime.

Williams is also charged in connection with the armed carjacking of a 22-year-old woman in Cuyahoga Falls about two hours prior to the Solon robbery. Congress is not charged in the Cuyahoga Falls robbery, and he has not been charged in federal court.

Solon police say the two men rear-ended the rabbis car about 1:30 p.m. on Glenallen Avenue, near Inwood Road. One robber stuck a gun in the rabbis side while the other stood by with a gun in his hands, according to federal court records.

The duo stole the rabbis keys and sped away in his 2022 Volvo S90. Solon police tracked the car by license plate readers and the cars On-Star navigation system to a barbershop on East 94th Street and Garfield Avenue in Garfield Heights.

Police arrested Williams after chasing him into a nearby building, where he tried to hide. Investigators found a credit card in Williams pocket that belonged to the woman robbed earlier in the day in Cuyahoga Falls.

That robbery happened on Third Street near Bailey Road. The womans car was rear-ended, and when she got out, armed robbers pointed a gun at her and stole her 2014 Jeep SW.

Read more from cleveland.com:

Attorneys for FirstEnergy Corp., executives demand judge disclose outside communications, research in lawsuit over HB6 bribery scandal; judge fires back

Cleveland activist sues city, police over wrongful arrest for openly carrying shotgun, handgun in citys Glenville neighborhood

Ohio Supreme Court upholds death sentence for Cleveland man who kidnapped, tortured, killed Alianna DeFreeze

Read the rest here:

Second man charged in armed carjacking of rabbi in Solon - cleveland.com

Im a rabbi who witnessed the attack on Salman Rushdie in Chautauqua. Here is how we can combat this type of hate – Forward

Posted By on August 22, 2022

On Aug. 12, celebrated author Salman Rushdie was stabbed at an event at the Chautauqua Institution. Photo by Charles Savenor & David Levenson/Getty Images Leven

When my wife and I first planned our trip upstate, a conversation between Salman Rushdie and Henry Reese at the Chautauqua Institution stood out to us as a programmatic highlight we did not want to miss. The two men would be discussing how America can support and protect political writers and creative expression. Considering Rushdies harrowing experience of being singled out as a target of a fatwa by Iran after the publication of The Satanic Verses over 30 years ago, we were eager to hear his thoughts about how best to ensure free speech today.

Our experience tragically morphed into something unexpected and surreal shortly after Rushdie and the moderator took their seats to great applause. A man jumped on the stage and began pummeling Rushdie. From where I sat 75 feet away, I could not see that the assailant was wielding a knife, only his arm going up and down repeatedly, thereby silencing the main speaker and all those in attendance.

This never happens at the Institution, people said aloud as much to themselves as those around them, as we collectively tried to make sense of what transpired.

Later that day we walked over to the amphitheater, where a pile of flowers, placards of hope and a candle adorned the entrance that had been closed since the attack. Watching the maintenance team scrub blood off the stage, I gasped at the realization that this violent attack had transformed this platform for inspiration and wisdom into a crime scene.

I attended this event not just for my own edification but also because it connects to my work at Civic Spirit, an organization that promotes and provides training in civic education to faith-based schools Jewish, Catholic, Christian, and Islamic with 4.5 million students nationwide. In our three-pronged approach, we cultivate civic belonging, democratic fluency and civic skills at a time when our country needs bridge building, understanding and trust more than ever.

While scrubbing away the blood and forming a prayer circle allowed Chautauqua Institution to reopen its cherished communal space, the most effective way to reclaim civility, community and shared responsibility in America is through education. More than planting seeds that will blossom in the future, civic education prepares young adults to become knowledgeable participants and stakeholders in this great democratic republic.

With rising distrust in government and a growing sense of helplessness in young people, civic education constitutes a constructive path forward. Unlike their public counterparts, day schools are not required to include civic education. At this polarized moment, it is vital that we not only ensure that our day schools focus on civics but also that teachers and administrators are supported in this endeavor at their parents kitchen table and spiritual leaders pulpits.

On Aug. 12, over 2,000 people at Chautauqua expected to learn how our society can encourage and support open dialogue and foster understanding across divides. Sadly what we witnessed was a brutal violation of the fundamental values of the Institution and America itself.

On a trip to Chautauqua over a hundred years ago, President Teddy Roosevelt asserted that Chautauqua Institution and its educational approach to dialogue and exploration represent America at its best. The attack on Salman Rushdie at Chautauqua reminds us of the great and worthy efforts incumbent on each generation to actualize this aspiration again and again.

To contact the author, email editorial@forward.com.

Rabbi Charles E. Savenor serves as the Executive Director of Civic Spirit. He is currently writing a memoir called What My Father Couldnt Tell Me.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are the authors own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Forward. Discover more perspective in Opinion.

Link:

Im a rabbi who witnessed the attack on Salman Rushdie in Chautauqua. Here is how we can combat this type of hate - Forward

Ben Gvir names scion of prominent rabbinic family to his far-right slate – The Times of Israel

Posted By on August 22, 2022

Far-right MK Itamar Ben Gvir has selected the son of a prominent national-religious family for the No. 4 slot on his Otzma Yehudit partys electoral slate.

Rabbi Amichai Eliyahu, who heads the Organization of Community Rabbis, a rabbinical group, is the grandson of Rabbi Mordechai Eliyahu, a former chief Sephardic rabbi of Israel, and the son of Rabbi Shmuel Eliyahu, the rabbi of Safed and a leading national-religious figure.

Eliyahus father has been known for controversial statements and rulings on Jewish law, including one that forbade the rental or sale of Jewish-owned property in the northern city of Safed to Arabs. He has also criticized the Reform movement, the LGBT community, and women serving in IDF combat units.

Eliyahu said it was a privilege to be joining Otzma Yehudit and vowed the party would connect a diverse range of citizens under a banner of love for Torah, love for the nation of Israel, and love of the land of Israel.

Ben Gvir hailed Eliyahu as an authentic representative of the knitted and transparent kippah-wearing public who is fighting for Jewish identity.

Get The Times of Israel's Daily Editionby email and never miss our top stories

The rabbi has been placed behind Otzma Yehudit director-general Yitzhak Wasserlauf, who has the no. 2 spot, and Almog Cohen, the partys representative for the Negev and periphery.

Jonathan Pollard speaks at the Mercaz Harav yeshiva Jerusalem Day gala on May 10, 2021. (Screen capture/YouTube)

Meanwhile, spy-for-Israel Jonathan Pollard ruled out running for the Knesset with Ben Gvir on Sunday after a report said that the far-right leader was considering offering him a spot.

Its important to me to contribute to the nation of Israel, but my place isnt in the Knesset. I think Ive already suffered enough, Pollard was quoted as saying by Channel 12 news.

As an intelligence analyst in the US Navys counterterrorism center, Pollard passed thousands of classified US documents to Israel before he was arrested in 1985, convicted of espionage, and sentenced to life in prison two years later.

He was released in 2015 and came to live in Israel in 2020.

Ben Gvir declared last week that his far-right Otzma Yehudit party will run independently in the November 1 general elections, after previously running as part of the Religious Zionism Party. He accused party leader Bezalel Smotrich of failing to negotiate on another joint run in good faith for a continued partnership.

Ben Gvir is widely reported to have demanded more prominent spots on the joint slate, in light of polls showing growing support for his party.

MK Itamar Ben Gvir, left, speaks during a press conference ahead of the upcoming elections, in Jerusalem, July 11, 2022; MK Bezalel Smotrich, right, leads a faction meeting at the Knesset, June 6, 2022. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

Otzma Yehudit is made up of disciples of the late extremist rabbi Meir Kahane, whose Kach party was banned from running for the Knesset due to its racist principles.

Despite the declaration of separation, an entire month remains before the September 15 deadline for submitting party lists, meaning that there is still time for negotiations on a joint run to be revived and concluded successfully.

Last week, Ben Gvir declared he wanted to introduce a bill providing courts the option to deport Arab citizens who attack soldiers with a nationalistic intent, as well as politicians who are deemed disloyal to the State of Israel.

Otzma Yehudit has of late been boosted by a series of favorable polls, some of which have shown a joint slate receiving more seats if Ben Gvir, rather than Smotrich, headed it. Others have predicted Otzma Yehudit would win more seats than Smotrichs far-right Religious Zionism party if they were to run separately.

A Channel 12 poll last week, for instance, showed Otzma Yehudit taking eight seats and Religious Zionism just five if the two parties run independently.

Jeremy Sharon contributed to this report.

It's not (only) about you.

Supporting The Times of Israel isnt a transaction for an online service, like subscribing to Netflix. The ToI Community is for people like you who care about a common good: ensuring that balanced, responsible coverage of Israel continues to be available to millions across the world, for free.

Sure, we'll remove all ads from your page and you'll unlock access to some excellent Community-only content. But your support gives you something more profound than that: the pride of joining something that really matters.

You're a dedicated reader

Were really pleased that youve read X Times of Israel articles in the past month.

Thats why we started the Times of Israel ten years ago - to provide discerning readers like you with must-read coverage of Israel and the Jewish world.

So now we have a request. Unlike other news outlets, we havent put up a paywall. But as the journalism we do is costly, we invite readers for whom The Times of Israel has become important to help support our work by joining The Times of Israel Community.

For as little as $6 a month you can help support our quality journalism while enjoying The Times of Israel AD-FREE, as well as accessing exclusive content available only to Times of Israel Community members.

Thank you, David Horovitz, Founding Editor of The Times of Israel

More here:

Ben Gvir names scion of prominent rabbinic family to his far-right slate - The Times of Israel

‘God is life,’ Rabbi Yonatan Neril on ecological conversion and the war in Ukraine – Religion News Service

Posted By on August 22, 2022

(RNS) Not long after Russias invasion of Ukraine in late February, Orthodox Jewish Rabbi Yonatan Neril found himself surrounded by 25 different religious leaders, including bishops, rabbis and sheiks, in Jerusalems Moscow Square as he affixed a letter calling for peace to the wall of the Russian Orthodox church.

The letter, signed by more than 150 religious leaders worldwide, including the Dalai Lama, called on Patriarch Kirill, the leader of the Russian Orthodox Church who has close ties to President Putin, to implore the Russian president to de-escalate the armed conflict and seek peace.

In this moment, religious leaders are called to rise to the occasion on behalf of God, people, and all creatures, read the interfaith letter Neril placed in Moscow Square.

Nearly six months later, the war in Ukraine rages on, bringing with it a growing list of both humanitarian and ecological concerns ranging from massive grain shortages to recent shelling around Ukraines largest nuclear power plant.

Neril is concerned about both. He is the founder and executive director of the Interfaith Center for Sustainable Development a Jerusalem-based nonprofit engaged in revealing the connection between religion and ecology worldwide and co-author of the best-selling Eco Bible, an ecological commentary on Hebrew Scripture.

God is life, Neril told RNS in a recent interview. We exist because every moment God is reinvigorating creation with life.Neril also spoke with RNS about the spiritual crises he sees at the root of both ecological degradation and warfare, and the role religion can play in response.

The following interview has been edited for length and clarity.

The ecological crisis is a spiritual crisis. Its not just about nature and bees and the birds and the trees and the toads. Its also about human beings and how we live as spiritual beings in a physical reality. And so, you know, with all due respect to Elon Musk and everyone buying a Tesla, were not going to curb climate change with Teslas alone when the operating system of billions of people is consumer-driven.

The only force in the world that changes this operating system of consumerism is religion and spirituality. The root issues were talking about are greed, short-term thinking, egoism, seeking pleasure in the physical.

The spiritual solutions to those are humility, long-term thinking, caring for other people and creatures. The only institutions in the world that can deliver that are religious institutions.

Scientists cant promote this transition. And politicians cant do it either. And business people also, I dont think can do it. The transition that Im thinking about a spiritual ecological transition it is about composting and its about clergy speaking from the pulpit about composting and its about that push being part of religion. But its, at a deeper level, about finding the center of our pleasure satisfaction in family and community and spirituality instead of finding that in fast food, new smart phones and cheap airplane travel.

Yes. Or another way of phrasing it would be an expansionist mentality. Which is a related topic I also occasionally speak about. I think we need a transition within religion from religions trying to expand their base of followers.

Pope Francis talks about ecological conversion of how essentially we need to transition to an ecological lifestyle. And I think its important that religions transition today to focus on that instead of focusing on trying to win more adherents to their particular religion.

At the end of the day it doesnt matter how many people of each religion there are in the world if we dont have a sustainable planet, because were all going to be held accountable by God for destroying the planet. Its not like the game ends and the religion with the most numbers of adherents wins. The religion with the most number of adherents on a destroyed earth loses, together with every other religion.

With the fighting around Europes largest nuclear reactor right now, were not just talking about Cain and Abel where Cain has a rock and hes killing his brother. Were talking about 8 billion people, all species that God created, and if something goes wrong, there could be a nuclear explosion. Or there could be a nuclear conflict between Russia and other nuclear powers. And so everything is at stake here.

We need to raise our level of spiritual awareness. It doesnt matter whether Russia has more territory. It doesnt matter that the Russian Orthodox Church has more faith adherents. What matters is doing what is right and proper in the eyes of God, to quote a verse from the book of Deuteronomy.

And in this case that means seeking peace and stepping back and doing it on behalf of the people in Ukraine and Russia. And doing it on behalf of all people, including the hundreds of millions of people who now have less to eat as a result of the conflict.

Yes, I think so. At the end of the day, caring for Gods planet, caring for our home is a value that we all should have whether we are progressive or conservative. That was part of the reason I wrote and published Eco Bible. The environmental movement began 50 years ago. For the past 50 years, most mainstream religious groups and clergy have not gotten onboard the ecological bandwagon partly because they see it as a progressive or tree-hugger cause.

Some of my values you might describe as conservative and some of them you might describe as progressive. The environmental movement is not going to succeed to convince conservatives to be progressives. But what I think faith-based ecological activists (could do), is try to speak with conservative people about how caring for Gods creation is a religious value. Its not a left wing thing, its something that is part of our religions and that God wants of us. And to properly be a religious person in this moment of history requires that we live a more ecological lifestyle.

We need to come together. First of all, when I say strength in numbers, it means that the messaging is stronger when were together. The more that religious leaders publicly speak about this issue, along with scientists who have been speaking about this now for decades, the more I think it will be convincing.

You know if the Dalai Lama, Ecumenical Patriarch (Bartholomew), Pope Francis and Rabbi (Jonathan) Sacks, of blessed memory, came together (to discuss the climate crisis), theres a certain seriousness with which you can take the issue. These are conservative religious people who, from a spiritual place, are able to understand that something is off here. And the melting of the ice caps and the record fires and droughts and flooding these are all signals that earth is messaging to us that we need to change. Religious leaders are in agreement about that. Thats the whole idea of bringing them together.

And then similarly with the war in Ukraine, if 150 religious leaders say to Patriarch Kirill, Were calling on you to seek peace, theoretically he should listen. You know, thats the idea. They are supposed to be his peers.

The rest is here:

'God is life,' Rabbi Yonatan Neril on ecological conversion and the war in Ukraine - Religion News Service

"Come To Punjab, Sardars Will Protect You": Singer Rabbi Shergill To Bilkis Bano – NDTV

Posted By on August 22, 2022

Rabbi Shergill said the judiciary and the politiians had forsaken the people.

Musician Rabbi Shergill, who once moved the country with his song 'Bilquis' that evoked the horrific gang rape of Bilkis Bano during the 2002 Gujarat riots, on Monday sent out a message of compassion for the survivor amid the nationwide outrage over the release of the 11 men convicted of the crime.

"I want to tell Bilkis, come to Punjab, we will protect you with our last drop of blood. The sardars will take care of you. And it's not just about my community. I personally want to hug her and convey to her that her pain is our pain, and she is not alone," he said on NDTV's show No Spin.

"And that is my message to almost everyone. And largely the message is please let's just start caring about justice. Because if we don't do that, we hollow out our society. We don't have heroes. Our next generation just wants to leave," Mr Shergill said.

"There is a crisis of morality in our country. There is a crisis of leadership. My generation, the media should step up a notch. The judiciary and the politicians - largely, if you talk to people - we have been forsaken by them, and we only have each other," he added.

On August 15, as India celebrated 75 years of Independence, all 11 convicts sentenced to life imprisonment in the 2002 case of Bilkis Bano's gang rape and murder of her seven family members during the Gujarat riots walked out of the Godhra sub-jail.

Their release was allowed by the state's BJP government under its remission policy, drawing severe criticism from Opposition parties and civil society.

A special CBI court in Mumbai on January 21, 2008, had sentenced them to life imprisonment. Their conviction was later upheld by the Bombay High Court.

They were released after the Supreme Court directed the government to consider the plea of the convicts for relief under the state's 1992 remission policy. They were welcomed by groups linked to the BJP with sweets, hugs and garlands.

A BJP MLA, part of the panel that cleared their release, called the men Brahmins with "good sanskar" (culture). The convicts had served more than 15 years in prison, after which one of them approached the Supreme Court with a plea for his premature release.

Bilkis Bano was 21 when she saw seven members of her family murdered. Among them was her daughter, who was just three years old. Seven other relatives, who she says were also killed, were declared "missing". The woman, five months pregnant, was then gang-raped.

Waiting for response to load...

The rest is here:

"Come To Punjab, Sardars Will Protect You": Singer Rabbi Shergill To Bilkis Bano - NDTV

Is this Russian rabbi fair game for sanctions, or being held to a double standard? – Forward

Posted By on August 22, 2022

Russia's President Vladimir Putin, right, with Rabbi Alexander Boroda, left, and Rabbi Berel Lazar, center, in a visit to the Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center in Moscow in 2013. Photo by Alexey Druzhinin/AFP via Getty Images

By Louis KeeneAugust 16, 2022

Rabbi Alexander Boroda, regarded as Russias second-most influential Jewish leader, feels misunderstood and worried for the nations Jews.

Boroda said the comments that prompted a leading pro-Ukraine group to add him to its list of people recommended for international sanctions were taken out of context, and that his inclusion puts Russias already vulnerable Jews at further risk.

Its not just me; its the whole organization, Boroda said last week in an interview, referring to his Federation of Jewish Communities of Russia, which serves more than 150,000 people in 180 communities.

Research all my official or not-official comments, interviews or everything, he added. You will not find anything about support of this war situation.

But since Rabbi Boroda was added on July 29 to a list of dozens of sellout opinion leaders by the Anti-Corruption Foundation, a group created by Russian dissident Alexei Navalny, two similar groups have put him in their sights as well.

A member of the National Agency on Corruption Prevention, a Ukrainian group compiling its own list of Vladimir Putin collaborators and supporters of the war in Ukraine, said that it was looking into Borodas case and would reach a determination in the next week on whether to add him.

And Jacob Nell, a member of the Yermak-McFaul Expert Group on Russian Sanctions, said: Having read his statements, I dont think Boroda has any defense.

About 7,000 individuals are, collectively, on the running lists compiled by these three groups, 1,000 of whom including the Russian Jewish oligarch Roman Abramovich and Lev Leviev have had sanctions actually leveled against them by governments including the United States and the European Union. Those sanctions generally ban the individuals from international travel and freeze their assets.

Looming over the dispute is the specter of an autocrat notorious for retaliating against dissenters and centuries of Jewish persecution in Eastern Europe. Boroda may be attempting to tread lightly in his public remarks, hoping to avoid the ire of Putin and the largely pro-war Russian public. A spokesperson for the Chabad movement, with which Boroda is affiliated, said adding the rabbi to the list was morally repugnant.

Russian Jews have been in a precarious situation since the war began. The Kremlin recently moved to shut down the Jewish Agency, which supports emigration to Israel. Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmidt, who was Moscows chief rabbi until the war began, is one of the thousands who have fled to Israel, leaving a position he held for 30 years. He told NPR last week that while before the war Russian Jewish leaders could keep a low profile, now the Kremlin is going to demand much more from everyone who is still in an official leadership position.

News reports have described Boroda as a Putin confidant, though the rabbi told the Forward he had not seen the Russian president since the beginning of the pandemic and that the two only speak about Judaism in Russia. He is also connected to Abramovich, who has historically been a major funder of Jewish causes in the country.

The comments that landed Boroda on the Anti-Corruption Foundations list were made March 4 in an interview with the Russian media outlet Interfax, in which he described a surge of neo-Nazism in Ukraine, seemingly propagating a claim Putin used as pretext for his Feb. 24 invasion.

He supported the main narrative of Russian propaganda that the aggression against Ukraine has a legitimate goal the denazification of Ukraine, a spokesperson for the group said. After that, no statements were made that would disavow pro-war statements.

Speaking via Zoom from his home in Moscow, Boroda said that his comments were similar to statements made by non-Russian Jewish leaders over many years. He said Interfax framed the comments in a misleading way, and that, at his behest, the news agency removed that question, as well as the preface about denazification, from its website some weeks later.

Interfax, an outlet that refers to the war in Ukraine as a special military operation, prefaced its article containing Borodas comments with the assertion that one of the goals of the war was the denazification of Ukraine a pretext that has been widely debunked outside of Russia.

The Jewish community of Russia has repeatedly condemned the episodes of neo-Nazism in Ukraine, the Interfax reporter said to Boroda. How do you characterize the nationalist movement of recent years?

Boroda responded by describing the surge of neo-Nazism in Ukraine at length and Ukraines failure to rein it in. He referred to a far-right Ukrainian party with neo-Nazi origins and to the monuments to Nazi collaborators that pock Ukrainian cities, before concluding: With a great deal of confidence, I believe that the majority of Ukrainian citizens do not support the ideology that has grown out of the criminal episodes of history.

These comments drew swift backlash from his Jewish counterparts in Ukraine.

Rabbi Moshe Reuven Azman, one of the countrys most prominent rabbis, told the Jerusalem Post that Boroda has a choice: either to be on the side of the light which is Ukraine or with the darkness: Russia.

Representatives from both the Anti-Corruption Federation and the National Agency said the timing of Borodas remarks and the fact that they were made to Interfax meant that the rabbi was tacitly throwing his weight behind a false Kremlin narrative justifying the war.

Antisemitism and neo-Nazism is at least as much of a problem in Russia, said Nell, of the McFaul group. So talking about it as if it is a problem in Ukraine and not in Russia is misleading and deliberately and intentionally misleading for somebody speaking in Borodas position.

Speaking to the Forward, Boroda said he never connected the question about neo-Nazi activity in Ukraine to the war. He noted that former Israeli President Reuven Rivlin had made similar comments in a 2016 address to the Ukrainian Parliament. And he clarified that he does not think Nazis are in power in Ukraine, but that a small quantity of people with fringe views who glorify historical Nazi collaborators has been growing gradually there in the last decade.

I answered exactly what they asked me, he said. They asked me whats my stance with the situation. I cannot say, Its OK. But its not a reason to enact war. Its not connected.

The National Agency researcher, however, said there were other parts of the interview that also made them suspicious about Borodas loyalties. For example, in discussing a Russian missile that landed at Babyn Yar, the site where Nazis executed tens of thousands of Jews in 1942, Boroda did not question the Interfax interviewers false assertion that the attack, as it turned out, did not take place.

As with the presence of neo-Nazism in Ukraine, the March 1 incident at Babyn Yar does not fit neatly into either sides narrative. Five people were killed in the missile attack, but it appeared to target a nearby telecommunications tower, not the memorial. Contrary to initial reports, most of the memorial, which is under construction, emerged unscathed.

Boroda was cryptic about it in the Interfax interview published the next day. You can not succumb to information hysteria, he said.

At the moment, media representatives from different countries confirm that the memorial is not damaged, he added. But, unfortunately, even the reports of publications with international authority can be unreliable.

Nell also raised questions about a statement Boroda sent to the Jewish community the day after the Russian invasion. While it mentioned respect for neighbors and their rights, Boroda also referenced the Ukrainian and Russian peoples shared history, and said that Jews in the Soviet Union never knew what separation and borders were, both echoes of Putins position that Ukraine is really just part of Russia.

Speaking with the Forward Aug. 8, Boroda said that he has never supported the war, even tacitly. He also avoided directly condemning it or even using the word war to directly describe the action, which Russia has made a crime punishable by 15 years in prison.

Throughout the 30-minute conversation, Boroda favored the term used by the Kremlin for the invasion of Ukraine a military operation instead, though he once referred to this war situation.

Speaking more broadly, though, he used the word freely and forcefully.

Theres never a reason to do war, because all problems could be solved and must be solved at the table, not by war and not by weapon, said Boroda, whose deputy was also present during the interview.

The rabbi said he had not been in contact with Putin since the war began, and chuckled when asked if he thought telling the Russian president to end it would have any effect.

Boroda described the sanctions against Abramovich as a huge problem for the federation and questioned whether sanctions had produced the pressure on Putin foreign governments had sought. Boroda had previously attributed 80% of the growth of Russian Jewish communities to Abramovich alone.

He said the sanctions on Jewish oligarchs were threatening the federations ability to keep community schools and synagogues open, and said that the orphans and elderly his organization feeds may suffer for it.

Some way I think we will have to close something, Boroda said.

And he downplayed the pressure against him that others have suggested, pointing out that Goldschmidt, the rabbi who fled Russia, told NPR that the government had not asked him directly to support the war.

Nobody pushed me to say something to support war, he said. And I dont know who was pushed to support it among the religious people. I dont know. For me, for sure not.

There are ways Russian religious leaders could stand to gain from toeing the line effectively. Lazar, the chief rabbi, said We must pray for peace, yet was visible in box seats at Russias Victory Day military parade this year.

According to Nell, who is also a senior research fellow at the Kyiv School of Economics, leaders who show fealty to Putin have access to a 0.1% lifestyle and their organizations may also benefit through the protections and perks that come with official state recognition.

When Goldschmidt was asked about Russian religious leaders who havent opposed the war as vehemently as he has, told the newspaper Israel Hayom that he doesnt judge leaders who dont come out against the war. The situation there is very difficult, he said. When you live in a country that isnt free, like Iran, you dont say everything thats on your mind.

Dietrich Brauer, who resigned as Archbishop of the Evangelical-Lutheran Church of Russia after leaving the country in March, said that the Kremlin issued a clear demand of all religious leaders to support the war, and most did.

The Jewish chief rabbi who also has American citizenship found clever words, Brauer said, referring to Berel Lazar, Russias chief rabbi who is considered the countrys most influential Jewish leader. He called on everyone to work for peace. We could have joined that. I wanted to write a joint statement with all religious communities, but the others didnt agree. Together we could have made a difference.

In an interview with the Jewish Telegraphic Agency a few weeks after the Interfax article was published, Boroda said, Its a complicated situation.

During times of war, people are not thinking rationally. Some think: Youre either with us or against us, he said then. We explain that bringing peace is the basis for any religious community, especially the Jewish one. But I cant say everyone understands. Some people from other faiths they expect us to support the military action.

A representative from Navalnys Anti-Corruption Federation said that Boroda was an open-and-shut case.

We believe that the statement was completely unambiguous and this is confirmed by the reaction of the Jewish community in Ukraine, outside observers in Israel, the assessment of these statements in Russia and our assessment of these words, the representative wrote in an email. We do not believe that the reproduction of the propaganda narrative leaves room for interpretation. On the contrary, attempts to disavow the statement do not contain any assessment of Russias aggression against Ukraine and are aimed not at clarifying the position, but at blurring it.

Rabbi Motti Seligson, a Chabad spokesperson in New York, said Boroda is focused on ensuring the wellbeing of the Russian Jews with whom he works. It is morally repugnant to suggest that Jewish communal leaders and rabbis in Russia who refuse to sacrifice their communities for the sake of some sort of pronouncement be punished, he said.

But Nell said good conscience would require Boroda taking a stand against Russias aggression.

Maybe he will find the moral courage to condemn the war now, before he gets sanctioned and cut off from the west, he said in a text message.

Louis Keene is a staff reporter at the Forward. He can be reached at keene@forward.com or on Twitter @thislouis.

Here is the original post:

Is this Russian rabbi fair game for sanctions, or being held to a double standard? - Forward

Catholic Gestapo agent who spied on Nazis and became anti-Zionist rabbi – Ynetnews

Posted By on August 22, 2022

Madeleine Lust Ferraille, Ruth Ben David and Ruth Blau are all the names of the same woman, whose life story has fascinated Jews the world over: a French double agent who found herself in trouble with the law and joined an anarchist Haredi faction and kidnapped Yossele Schumacher.

Some 60 years on, the affair still has repercussions.

8 View gallery

Ruth Blau as Madeleine Lust Ferraille

Two separate pieces of research, soon to be published in book form - one by Prof. Motti Inbari, Professor of Jewish Studies at the University of South Carolina at Pembroke, another by Prof. Kimmy Caplan, based at Bar Ilan University - are shedding new light on details about the woman at the center of the Yossele Schumacher affair.

The new research draws a portrait of this extraordinary woman who, in many ways, remains a mystery even after her death.

Prof. Inbari has compiled a new biography about Ruth, soon to be published (Ruth Blau: "A Life of Paradox and Purpose", Indiana University Press), meticulously collating testimonies and documents about this mysterious woman. Earlier this month, he gave a lecture at the 18th World Congress of Jewish Studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Years before joining Neturei Karta, an anti-Zionist ultra-Orthodox group, or her involvement with the Mossad and Interpol, Madeleine Lust Ferraille was born an only child in Calais, France to a Catholic French family. She grew up in central Paris. Prof. Inbari explains that "her childhood home faced one of Paris's most famous churches. This - and her Catholic school education - perhaps serve as precursors to her interest in religion in her adult life."

8 View gallery

French Resistance document

(Photo: Courtesy of Moti Anbari)

Both Inbari and Caplan claim that the autobiography Ruth Ben David-Blau wrote herself is awash with contradictions. Prof. Kimmy Caplan, expert in Jewish Religious History in the 19th and 20th centuries, has been studying the affair for many years. He claims that autobiographies are rather dubious sources. It's always a "stained memory of the past. A lot of people have simply gone with what she wrote and constructed a story accordingly. That's a mistake."

He describes an assertive and courageous woman. He says that she wrote her autobiography after the Yossele affair, but a tremendous amount of detail seems to have been edited out. Researchers have since gathered this information. "The book was published almost a decade after the affair. By this time, Ruth was an icon, a highly respected rebbetzin - the rabbi's wife - in Neturei Karta. There were elements which would have been incompatible with the persona of a Neturei Karta rebbetzin and so were omitted from the autobiography.

"Although she was known as Madeleine in the Israeli press, she went by the name Lust. She lived in the center of Paris, adjacent to the Luxembourg Gardens. Her parents didn't get along and there was a lot of tension at home. Over the years, I believe because of her life choices, her relationship with her father became strained."

Prof. Inbari, who researches the history of religion and orthodoxy, claims that Ruth wrote it herself. "I found letters her father had written to her during World War II, highlighting tension between the two. When war broke out, Lust, later known as Ruth, was already a young woman. She left Paris for the south of France. Her mother joined her, essentially separating from Lust's father who remained in Paris. She met her first husband on the Spanish-French border, where her only son, Claude (later Hebraicized to Uriel) was born. She worked as a teacher. The marriage quickly fell apart."

8 View gallery

Madeleine Lust Ferraille

(Photo: Courtesy of Moti Anbari)

After World War II: Torture and interrogation

This, however, is only one small part of the convert who became a rebbetzin. Inbari travelled to France in search of further material offering an alternative perspective to that presented in her own autobiography. Inbari rummaged through French archival material in to find out more about Ruth's life before her conversion to Judaism.

"The story starts getting interesting in 1944 when she joins the Resistance. She writes that she was part of an underground guerilla movement, without providing further details - for good reason. I found her recruitment papers and French intelligence documents recording her operations. She was recruited to spy on the Gestapo, official secret police of Nazi Germany, aiming at undermining French and Allied forces' underground operations. She managed to win their trust and became an officer in the Gestapo. I think this is why she never talked about it. What Jew wants to hear that Ruth the convert had actually been a Gestapo officer?"

All this is going on while she's married with a small child, whose life essentially in endangered by his mother's actions?

"Indeed. The child was in grave danger. Before joining the Gestapo, she carried out an operation independently rescuing a Jewish woman from certain death in a concentration camp in France. Her file contains documents about this operation. Ruth travelled by train carrying forged documents, went into the concentration camp, announced that there had been a mistake and pulled the woman out of the camp.

When the war ended, people knew that she had been a Gestapo officer. Anyone who had collaborated with the Nazis was arrested. Ruth was arrested and apparently tortured."

All this time, her son was with his grandmother, Ruth's mother (still known as Madeleine) who very much opposed to Ruth's operations. Prof. Inbari, however, believes that Ruth's character included what he calls "a love of the fear of death." He adds "even after the war, she carried on working with French intelligence. Her identity was exposed in an operation in Morocco, where she was imprisoned for tax evasion."

Inbari adds that "in the Yossele affair, if she hadn't gotten a plea bargain, she'd have sat in jail for a long time. She definitely knew what jail was about and what she was getting herself into. She was constantly striding both sides of the law. These details do not appear in her autobiography."

8 View gallery

Ruth Ben David with her son Uriel

(Photo: Family album)

Prof. Caplan has written a book about Ruth's most famous partner Neturei Karta leader, Rabbi Amram Blau. His book about the abduction of Yossele Schumacher will also soon be available. "I believe there to be great discrepancy between what she tells us and what we know. The most influential woman in the Resistance in the south of France, Madame Foucarde, wrote a book about the Resistance's clandestine operations in the region. She includes a list of underground operatives in the area. Madeleine Lust's name isnt on the list. If, as Ruth claims, she was central to operations, why isnt her name there?

"Its still unclear whether she played a minor or major role in operations. Further unanswered questions include the names of government offices she claims to have worked in offices which have no record of her employment. Maybe things were inflated or exaggerated."

Caplan notes that human memory is a very misleading tool. "When a person looks back on their life, they basically rewrite that life. Things get lost, even unintentionally. It's human nature. For example, although she claims that she was interested in religion in her 20s, there is nothing to suggest this. Working as a dancer in the bars of Paris doesn't show a great deal of interest in religion."

A dancer in Parisian bars?

"Yes, definitely. There are records from the 1940s. The Mossad has testimonies. She was a very beautiful divorce with a child and she needed to earn a living. This isnt in her autobiography either."

Breakdown and spiritual remedy

When she was exposed following her adventures during WWII, she was suspended from French intelligence services. Inbari describes what followed as a breakdown of sorts: "She describes not eating or getting out of bed. I'm not a physiatrist, but that's depression. She says that she looked to religion as a cure. She started out with the Seventh Day Adventists (A Christian sect celebrating Shabbat). She then went on to study religion at the Sorbonne University."

Prof. Inbari recounts: "At the Sorbonne, she met an Israeli man studying France Studies, who would eventually become professor of French Literature at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He proposed marriage and brought her to Israel. She looked into converting to Judaism. Madeleine decided on a conversion track via the Reform Movement in Paris. The couple parted ways, but she continued on her path to Judaism. Following the conversion, she changed her name to Ruth Ben David, a name laden with symbolism of her conversion."

8 View gallery

Ruth Ben David

(Photo: Family album)

She didn't stop looking for a match. Inbari explains that she then met an Orthodox rabbi from Alsace, "but remember, she had a Reform conversion, so to find a match, she now went through an Orthodox conversion. This is when she's jailed for tax evasion."

This also fell apart. At the end of the day, the rabbi's community, uncomfortable with her background and conversion, did not accept her. Ruth faced a recurring theme of not striking a shidduch (marriage match) on grounds of her being a convert."

Inbari explains that Ruth soldiered on into Orthodox Judaism, eventually making Aliyah to a Hassidic community.

"Her son's life was also shaken up. At first, he was an 'external child' at the religious 'Kvutzat Yavneh.' She removed him from there and enrolled him in an extremist yeshiva in Switzerland. He returned to Israel in the 1960s to the Haredi, yet relatively open yeshiva, Be'er Yaakov. It's definitely not Neturei Karta."

An invitation to join the Mossad

When Ruth left Israel, Claude-Uriel asked her to return to find a marriage partner. "For years on end, she endures being a divorced convert. Then, comes the Yossele Schumacher affair."

The Yossele Schumacher story begins in the 1960s, when the boys family make Aliyah from the Soviet Union: grandparents, children and grandchildren. Nahman, the grandfather, was a Breslav Hassid living in Uman, Ukraine. Despite the Communist rule, characterized by atheism, the family managed to keep up religious practices and the grandfather was sent to Siberia where his health deteriorated and he lost his eyesight.

The family, however, retained its conservative Orthodox lifestyle. But, one of the daughters removed one of her two sons from an Orthodox yeshiva in Mea Shearim in Jerusalem, placing him in a nationalist-religious school. The grandfather regarded this as a "shemed" (a forced conversion out of Judaism) and decided to abduct his own grandson.

Prof. Inbari says that Ruth enters the picture as the boy is transferred to the custodianship of Neturei Karta. "Ruth's rabbi called on her to help smuggle the boy out of the country. Using an old passport son's passport, Claude-Uriel becomes Claudine. They took a picture of Yossele dressed as a girl and switched the pictures. This is how Yossele was smuggled out of Israel to Europe and onto the United States."

8 View gallery

Yossele Schumacher

(Photo: David Rubinger)

Inbari believes that Ruth being approached by a religious figure was what made her agree to do it. "After nearly two years of unsuccessful searches, the Mossad entered the picture. They managed to connect Ruth to the affair, abduct Ruth in France and interrogate her. They also interrogated her son Claude-Uriel, who told the Mossad everything, confessing to the abduction. In exchange for immunity for herself and her son, Ruth also confessed, admitting guilt and giving the Mossad Yossele's location in New York."

At what stage does the Mossad recruit her?

Inbari laughs: "We don't have access to Mossad documents, but what I found suggests that this followed the Yossele affair. The Mossad suggested she join their ranks which, as an anti-Zionist Haredi - she completely rejected. Issar Harel hints at this in his book. She mentions this offer in her book, but it seems rather vague. It's also important to understand that agents often lay dormant for extended periods. I wouldn't rule out her continued role with French intelligence."

Prof. Kimmy Caplan points out: "For two and a half years, Ruth's impressive skills in abducting Yossele had the whole country on its feet the Israeli police, Interpol. This gained their respect and admiration."

Did she emerge unscathed?

"Yes, that was the deal. But she didn't come out completely clean. In France, she was judged and sentenced for kidnapping and illegally transporting a child. The other parties involved also paid no price apart from Yossele's uncle. Then-Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion decided to close the affair as quickly as possible."

The shidduch that tore apart Neturei Karta

The end of the Yossele affair was the beginning of a new, no less tumultuous one - Ruth's marriage to Neturei Karta's then-spiritual leader, Rabbi Amram Blau. After two years in France, Ruth arrived in Mea Shearim. Rabbi Amram Blau was widowed only two months earlier. "He saw her and decided he wanted to marry her which led to great scandal."

Inbari explains: "The entire community in Mea Shearim, including his own children, was vehemently opposed to the match. I assume the children were taken aback by the short time-lapse following their mother's death. They also didn't like the woman chosen to replace her a convert. Great turmoil erupted." Prof. Inbari adds that in addition to the rabbi's children, was a shadchan (matchmaker) already counting his fee for matching her up with a different rabbi."

8 View gallery

Yossele Schumacher

(Photo: David Rubinger)

Politics lay beneath all of this. "My hypothesis is that this was in fact a power struggle within Neturei Karta. Rabbi Amram had a lot of enemies with conflicting interests. He liked stirring things up, but they had further interests, including kashrut certifications. They were concerned that Rabbi Amrams scathing remarks about Agudat Israel and Haredim, who were engaged in Israeli politics, would cause Neturei Karta to be ostracized, that a 'herem' would be declared against them. They were afraid that Amram would torpedo the Jerusalem City Hall budget to refurbish Haredi public buildings. Amram opposed it, because it didn't interest him."

Rabbi Amram and his wife are long gone, but the ongoing demonstrations along Jerusalem's light rail route are a stark reminder that the extremist element within Neturei Karta is still here and is ready to riot. Inbari believes that "people are wrong about conflating the Haredi community and Neturei Karta. They're not the same thing. Neturei Karta is a modern, combatant faction that they can't control. The Haredi leadership saw Rabbi Amram's marriage as an opportunity to rid themselves of him. They held wild demonstrations, demanding he revoke the engagement.

"Amram fought for his right to marry Ruth. The compromise was that they would marry and would be 'exiled' to Bnei Brak. I think that the plan all along was to weaken Rabbi Amram and to sow division within Neturei Karta, which indeed does become a weakened, divided organization."

What would a French convert find in Neturei Karta?

"She did a great deal. She raised funds, dealt with public relations and advised Rabbi Amram. From their correspondence, we learn how she offered him advice and ideas, how to behave, to whom to turn. She also encouraged him to carry on fighting for the legitimacy and acceptance of their marriage, and became a matchmaker herself."

Rebbetzin who met Khomeini

Prof. Inbari points out that although women are not in decision-making positions in the Hassidic world, the rebbetzin holds a special role. "Ruth Blau was no different in this respect."

"This is that hard part. The couple had a 26-year age gap. She was still of childbearing age, but Rabbi Amram had fertility problems, the source of battles at home. She wanted more children. He didn't. He wouldn't agree to treatment of his fertility issues. It looks like he didn't really want to have children with her. She even left him, taking off to France."

8 View gallery

The book about Ruth Blau by Motti Inbari

In his book about Rabbi Amram Blau, Prof. Caplan points out that the rabbi's inability to father children was already known and was even, when facing Badatz rabbis, used as a premise for marrying a convert, whereby there would be no "stained" children produced by the union, corrupting the family tree. We don't know how much Ruth knew about all of this.

Prof. Inbari believes that this failure transformed Ruth into a humanitarian success story.

"She brands herself as a representative for rescuing Jews through visits in Lebanon and Iran. She even met former Supreme Leader of Iran Ruhollah Khomeini and Palestinian resistance representatives in Lebanon. She continued her role as diplomatic rebbetzin. On a fundraising trip to London, aged 78, she suffered a stroke. She died two years later, outliving her husband by 25 years.

Continued here:

Catholic Gestapo agent who spied on Nazis and became anti-Zionist rabbi - Ynetnews

Of Thorns And Thistles (Part II) – The Jewish Press – JewishPress.com

Posted By on August 22, 2022

Last week, we began our exploration of 16th century Italian scholar Rabbi Shlomo of Urbinos list of the 17 different words to connote thorns or thistles in Biblical Hebrew. Commentators and etymology experts offer insights into these different words and the meanings contained in their structure or drawn from the context in which they are used. We thought it would take two more columns to cover them all, but weve wrangled these last ten thistles and thorns into one place so put on your mental gardening gloves and lets go!

Atad

This word appears in the Bible four times in the sense of thorn (Psalms 58:10, Judges 9:15-15). It is also the Aramaic word used by the Targum to render the Hebrew word dardar from last week (see Targum to Genesis 3:18 and Hoshea 10:8). The word atad also appears in Goren HaAtad literally the Granary of the Atad where Jacob was eulogized after his death (Genesis 50:10-11). The Talmud (Sotah 13a) finds this name a bit funny taken at face value, because theres no such thing as a granary for thorns. Instead, the Talmud relates the name to the custom of erecting thorn fences around the perimeter of ones granary, explaining that a similar thing happened when the kings of Canaan encountered Jacobs coffin, as the royals placed their jagged crowns around its perimeter to honor him.

Chedek

This word refers to a thorn known as a brier or stacheldorn and appears only twice in the Bible (Proverbs 15:19, Micah 7:4).

Outside of Biblical Hebrew, the root chet-daled-kuf refers to cutting, pricking, injuring, and squeezing/wedging in. Ohalei Yehuda writes that the word chedek may be a portmanteau of chad (sharp or single) and dak (thin), or a metathesis of the word dochak (force/pressure). There was a Tannaic sage named Rabbi Chidka, famous for his position that one is obligated to eat not three but four meals on the Sabbath (Shabbat 117b). It would be interesting to consider whether his name is a pun related to these understandings of the root chet-daled-kuf.

Shamir

The prophet Isaiah compares the Jewish People to a vineyard, with a warning: If they continue to stray away from Hashem, then He will no longer tend to the vineyard and will instead allow shamir and shayit to grow there instead of grapes (Isaiah 5:6; see also Isaiah 10:17). Although the word shamir appears in the Bible eight times in the sense of thorn in the book of Isaiah, it also appears three times in other places as something used to cut rocks (Jeremiah 17:1, Zecharia 7:12, Ezekiel 3:9). This latter meaning either refers to some sort of very hard stone that can be used for cutting less hard rocks, or to the legendary shamir worm used for cutting hard rocks (see Gittin 68a). Either way, it relates back to the idea of thorns because thorns are sharp and cutting.

The three early lexicographers Menachem Ibn Saruk, Yonah Ibn Janach, and Radak all connect shamir to the triliteral root shin-mem-reish, commonly translated as protecting or guarding. Shoresh Yesha and, to some extent Rabbi Hirsch to Genesis 24:6 say one must watch oneself when dealing with thorns in order to avoid getting hurt by them.

Shayit

Ibn Janach writes that shayit has a cognate word in Arabic that also means thorn. Rabbi Pappenheim traces shayit to the root shin-aleph, which means uniformity/equivalence. As he explains it, the word shoah (holocaust) also derives from this root, as it implies total uniform destruction. Consequently, Rabbi Pappenheim explains that shayit refers to those thorns and thistles which tend to grow in the ruins of destroyed and desolate places.

Barkan

The term barkan appears twice in the Bible, both times alongside the word kotz (Judges 8:7 and 16). The early lexicographers Menachem Ibn Saruk, Yonah Ibn Janach, and Radak all categorize this word as an offshoot of the root bet-reish-kuf. The other words derived from that root are barak (lightning), barak (the shiny luster of a sword) and bareket (a yellowish gemstone, possibly emerald). Radak explains the connection between these three words by explaining that the luster of a polished sword and the glow of a bareket gemstone both resemble the glow of lightning. But neither Radak nor the other grammarians mentioned above indicate a connection between barkan as thorn and the meaning of the other words derived from this root. In lieu of such an explanation, Rabbi Yehoshua Steinberg of the Veromemanu Foundation offers the following insight: Even though a shiny sword might look nice, its real power as a formidable weapon is in the sharpness of its blade. Accordingly, Rabbi Steinberg suggests that the word barkan which denotes a sharp thorn was derived from barak in the sense of a swords glow.

Charul

This word appears three times in the Bible (Zephania 2:9, Proverbs 24:31, and Job 30:7). Radak explains it as a sort of grass-like thorn. Others define it as nettle or thistle. In his work Kesset HaSofer, Rabbi Aharon Marcus (1843-1916) writes, how at its core, the biliteral root chet-reish means strong and obstinate movement (in his work Barzilai, he renders it as anger and destruction) and proceeds to show how that letter combination combines with every other letter of the Hebrew Alphabet to create triliteral roots related to that concept. Many of those triliteral roots relate to using powerful movements to bore a hole, and thats exactly how Rabbi Marcus understands the core meaning of the word charul. Ohalei Yehuda offers two more ways of explaining the etymology of charul. First, he understands that the biliteral root chet-reish primarily refers to heat/dryness, and thus argues that charul is a portmanteau of that root plus the word lo (for him), in allusion to the dry and fiery nature of this type of thorn. Alternatively, Ohalei Yehuda argues that the root chet-reish-lammed may be interpreted in light of the root ayin-reish-lammed (blockage/stoppage, like the term urel which refers to man whose foreskin is intact and refers to fruits from a new tree which are blocked by halacha from consumption) due to the interchangeability of chet and ayin. He understands the core meaning of ayin-reish-lammed to be covering and explains that charul refers to a sort of thorn or thistle that tends to cover the face of ones field.

Akrav

In two places in the Bible (Deuteronomy 8:15, Ezekiel 2:6), the word akrav clearly refers to the deadly insect known as a scorpion. In another four places, King Rehoboam portends to act more harshly with his subjects than did his father King Solomon, and especially threatens to torture His people with akravim (I Kings 12:11, 12:14, II Chronicles 10:11, 10:14). In the latter context, the commentators explains that Rehoboam did not mean to use actual scorpions on his people, but rather meant to threaten the use of flogging sticks with thorn-like spikes that resemble scorpions. Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch (to Psalms 140:2-4) writes that four-letter animals names in Hebrew that begin with an ayin are not actually derived from quadriliteral roots, but rather derive from triliteral roots with the letter ayin added to those roots. Examples of this phenomenon include atalef (bat), achsuv (venom-spitting snake), akabish (spider), achbar (mouse), and, of course, akrav. Rabbi Hirsch thus explains that the root of akrav is kuf-reish-bet (approaching) and refers to its perpetual readiness to engage in warfare (krav) and attack those who threaten it. Akrav seems to refer to thorns in a borrowed sense, as something whose pokey protrusions are scorpion-like. Interestingly, a place named Maale Akrabaim is mentioned three times in the Bible (Numbers 34:4, Joshua 15:3, and Judges 1:36), but its not clear if or how that city in the southern part of the Holy Land is related to thorns or scorpions.

Kimosh

The Vilna Gaon (to Proverbs 24:31) differentiates between kimosh and charul by noting that kimosh refers to thorns that grow along the perimeter of a field, while charul refers to any ordinary thorn that one might could touch and get burnt (i.e., pierced/poked). Perhaps we may somehow connect the word kimosh (spelled with a kuf) to the name of the Moabite deity Chemosh (spelled with a kaf).

Bashah

This word appears only once in the Bible, when Job tries to assert his innocence by saying that if he had not given to the poor the tithes required of him, then instead of wheat shall come out choach, and instead of barley, bashah (Job 31:40). From its juxtaposition to choach, the commentaries understand that bashah is also a type of thorn weed that grows in ones field. Rabbi Pappenheim traces this word to the biliteral root bet-shin (cessation of movement), whose main derivative is the word bushah (embarrassment) and from that gave way to various words that bear negative connotations such that people would be embarrassed to be associated with them, like baash (putrid/spoiled/disgusting), beushim (bad quality grapes), and I would add possibly the Aramaic word bisha (evil/bad).

Now that weve seen the entire list, we can better appreciate a comment that Rashi made off the cuff. After Rashi (to Ezekiel 2:6) cited Donashs explanation of the word saravim as referring to thorns, Rashi very nonchalantly added that there are twenty words for this noun. The same statement is found in Rabbi Saadia Gaons commentary to Proverbs (15:19) after he defines the word chadek as thorn. With our entire list in mind, we can now understand exactly what Rashi and Rasag meant when they claimed that there are twenty words for thorn in Hebrew. Although, if youve really been keeping track, we actually have 21 words (including naatzuz).

Original post:

Of Thorns And Thistles (Part II) - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com


Page 250«..1020..249250251252..260270..»

matomo tracker