Page 298«..1020..297298299300..310320..»

Voices of European Jewry: Helsinki, Finland | The Pittsburgh Jewish Chronicle – thejewishchronicle.net

Posted By on July 14, 2022

What time does Shabbat start tomorrow in Helsinki? I ask.

Chana, the 25-year-old pen pal hosting me during my visit in Helsinki, Finland, walks from the hallway of her apartment to the living room. She picks up a large, paper wall calendar, like the Jewish calendars synagogues send me each year in the United States. Placing her finger on July 7, she replies, 10:22 p.m. I ask when Shabbat ends. The answer is a time well after midnight.

I am surprised that Shabbat lasts longer than 25 hours. Chana explains that in most of the world, Shabbat ends when three stars are visible in the sky. But the Jewish community in Helsinki is one of the most northern in the world. As a result, in Finnish summers, there are no stars to be seen; it doesnt get fully dark during Finnish summer nights. Instead of looking for three stars at the end of Shabbat, Finnish Jews follow the halachic hour a term used in rabbinic Jewish law, where an hour is calculated by taking the total time of daylight of a particular day, from sunrise until sunset, and dividing it into twelve equal parts. The halachic hour varies by the season and sometimes by the day.

Get The Jewish Chronicle Weekly Edition by email and never miss our top storiesFree Sign Up

Chana isnt the only Jew in Helsinki who follows the halachic hour as a guide. While there are approximately 1,300 Jews in Finland mainly in Helsinki, with a smaller community in Turku Chana is part of one of 10 families who call themselves frum. She wears a dress whenever she is out in public, strictly observes Shabbat and keeps kosher.

Each weekend Chana makes the 17-minute walk to Shabbat services at the Helsinki Synagogue. There is only one synagogue in Helsinki and it is Orthodox, yet most of its members do not identify as Orthodox. Many, in fact, are not religiously observant and identify simply as culturally Jewish.

A security guard wearing shorts and a simple T-shirt greets Chana as we walk up to the gates which surround the building on Wednesday. He doesnt acknowledge me as they begin chatting in Finnish. He instantly opens the gate and waves us inside. He doesnt check my bag or ask to see my passport. He knows Chana, and apparently that is good enough for him.

Chana leads me into the secretarys office; I feel funny walking right into a room instead of knocking first. But it is clear from the way Chana walks that she knows her way around the synagogue, the place where she has grown up.

Chana Swanstrom (left) and Madison Jackson. Photo by Deanna Amoriello.

The secretary leads us to the sanctuary, and my first reaction is: Wow the walls are green. Chana and I sit down in brown, wooden seats facing the bima, behind a few rows of Israelis visiting on a tour. A man stands at the front of the bima and speaks in Hebrew.

He used to be our cantor, Chana whispers to me. Now he lives in Israel but comes back to Helsinki every summer.

A second later, realizing that the cantor is speaking only in Hebrew, Chana nudges me on the arm and hands me her phone. She has typed Do you understand Hebrew? I nod my head.

The cantor picks up a guitar and starts singing Shehechiyanu. I hear Chana quietly join in.

When the cantor and the Israelis leave, I walk around the sanctuary. I pick up a Sidur Helsinki and flip through the pages. I am excited to see the Finnish language

side-by-side with the Hebrew prayers. I learn that while most Jews in Helsinki are Ashkenazi, there are some Sephardic and Mizrahi Jews in Helsinki who join the Ashkenazi services.

Next, we walk to the adjoining Jewish school. To enroll, at least one parent of a child must be a member of the Jewish community. In Helsinki, all Jewish institutions, except for the Chabad house, are based in one large complex: the Jewish school, the Jewish community center, the synagogue, Jewish youth spaces, the mikvah, a Jewish library, the Jewish preschool. The secretary points out the tables where students eat their lunch each day. Chana recalls the excitement she and her classmates had as kids when it was their turn to ring a golden bell before chanting Birkat Hamazon.

Chana seems so comfortable in her Jewish community. I feel pretty comfortable in her community. As we walk back to her apartment from the synagogue, she runs into someone and has a short conversation with him. Jews, she says to me smiling, as we walk away. It reminds me of something I would say in the States all Jews know each other.

And yet, as much as I have enjoyed my time in Helsinki and appreciate the friendly atmosphere that surrounds the happiest place in the world (according to World Happiness Report rankings based largely on life evaluations from the Gallup World Poll), I feel that I wouldnt love living in a place with so few Jewish institutions. Later, I ask Chana if it is hard to live in a place where there are not many other religious Jews, and she instantly replies yes.

Its the reason I moved to England for university, so I could be with a larger religious community, she says. But Im not sure yet where I will live in the future. PJC

Madison Jackson, a graduate student at the Chatham University MFA program in Creative Nonfiction Writing, is the founder and executive director of the Global Jewish Pen Pal Program. She is traveling throughout Europe this summer and writing for the Chronicle about Jewish life in diverse locations. She lives in Squirrel Hill.Read more about her travels on pittsburghjewishchronicle.org.

See the original post:

Voices of European Jewry: Helsinki, Finland | The Pittsburgh Jewish Chronicle - thejewishchronicle.net

20 Years On, The Prince of Egypt is Still a Captivating Adaptation of the Story of Exodus – mxdwn.com

Posted By on July 14, 2022

Briana Luck July 12th, 2022 - 6:59 AM

It was the year 1998 and DreamWorks Animation had released its second animated feature film The Prince of Egypt. The mere production of the film itself could be interpreted as risky, especially considering how DreamWorks was founded with the intention to compete with animation titans Disney and Pixar. The film was bold in a sense that the narrative was based around the story of Moses which appears in both the Torah and Bible. Hollywood is known to depict anti-religious or apathetic sentiments toward religion and faith in general, so for The Prince of Egypt to be given the green light and produced at all is a marvel in itself.

The Prince of Egypt proved itself as a worthy competitor to Disney and Pixar through its impressive box office returns, grossing $218 million worldwide on a $70 million budget. For comparison, Disneys Mulan (1998) boasted a budget of $90 million and garnered $304 million. The film also gained critical acclaim for its stellar musical score by Stephen Schwartz and Hans Zimmer, culminating in an Oscar for Best Original Song (When You Believe).

We follow Moses (Val Kilmer, singing by Amick Byram) and Ramesses II (Ralph Fiennes) as the brothers grow apart due to the inevitable calling of their conflicting destinies. The story primarily centers around Moses as he discovers that hes chosen by God (also voiced by Val Kilmer) to lead the Hebrews out of slavery. The films opening immediately engages the viewer with its grandiose animation and the heart-wrenching Deliver Us. During this sequence, baby Moses is taken in by Queen Tuya (Helen Mirren, singing by Linda Dee Shayne) as one of her own, and the plight of the enslaved Hebrew people draws immediate sympathy from the audience as they suffer at the hands of the tyrannical Pharaoh Seti I (Patrick Stewart).

The film delves strongly into character work and its themes are universally understood by children and adults alike. Moses and Ramesses share a special connection as brothers. In the short time they are together, their dialogue and interactions come from a place of genuine kinship that is heartbreaking to see shattered by the different paths they take later on in life. Moses soon learns of his true heritage as a Hebrew, which causes him to spiral into a crisis of identity in terms of what his place in the world is. The imagery of how the truth is revealed to Moses is crafted beautifully through the films visual storytelling.

Shocked to see that his people that are oppressed at the hands of the Egyptians who raised him, Moses flees into the wilderness. It is there that he meets the nomadic Midians and is given a new perspective by the Midian priest Jethro (Danny Glover, singing by Brian Stokes Mitchell). Most notably, however, is when Moses meets God in the form of a burning bush. God commands him to free the Hebrews from slavery, which forces him to confront the past he willingly left behind. The animation in the burning bush scene flows incredibly well as complemented by the ethereal orchestral backdrop.

And so, Moses makes his way to Egypt to see Ramesses, who is now the new Pharaoh. Ramesses has followed in the footsteps of his father and continued the abusive cycle of power, completely blind to the suffering of the Hebrew people. Forcibly at odds with the other, Moses demands that his brother free his people. When Ramesses refuses, he inadvertently unleashes hell onto the Egyptians. The Plagues score is masterfully rendered with the composition of the animated sequences, perfectly encapsulating the plight the Egyptians endure through each plague. Despite the suffering of his own people, Ramesses continues to refuse to let Moses people go. It isnt until the death of his son that he relents and allows the Hebrew people their freedom.

The story of Exodus is cruel and harsh, one that would seem to not fit the simpler conditions needed for a childrens movie. The opening sequence of the film alone depicts slavery and ethnic cleansing.. However, The Prince of Egypt manages to balance child-friendliness while still being able to implement deeper and more complex themes for adults to dissect and appreciate. The expressive animation and lighthearted exchanges between characters assist in making the viewing of the story more digestible to younger audiences. All the while, the film doesnt hold back when exhibiting its more mature themes through the use of great shot composition, direction, and an outstanding score.

Overall, The Prince of Egypts greatest achievement is how it can connect to all people universally, despite their differing faiths or lack thereof. The movie is able to convey a compelling and profoundly human story that resonates with everyone because of its themes of hope, faith, and identity.

Read more from the original source:

20 Years On, The Prince of Egypt is Still a Captivating Adaptation of the Story of Exodus - mxdwn.com

Biden and Lapid jointly pledge to deny Iran weapons, but they diverge on the details – JTA News – Jewish Telegraphic Agency

Posted By on July 14, 2022

JERUSALEM (JTA) After releasing a joint statement that demonstrates unity on the need to counter the Iranian nuclear threat, U.S. president Joe Biden and Israeli prime minister Yair Lapid gave statements that demonstrate radical differences in their approach to doing so.

The document released on Thursday, the second day of Bidens visit to Israel, is a 1,500-word statement titled The Jerusalem Declaration on the US-Israel Strategic Partnership. It states that the United States is committed never to allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon and is prepared to use all elements of its national power to ensure that outcome.

But after the leaders meeting Thursday, Biden and Lapid gave a joint press conference in which Biden said that in working to prevent a nuclear Iran, I continue to believe that diplomacy is the best way to achieve this outcome.

Lapid struck a different note, showing some of the daylight between Israel and the United States on the issue of what is widely understood to be the biggest threat in the region.

The Iranian regime should know that if they continue to deceive the world, they will pay a heavy price, Lapid said. Words will not stop them, Mr. President. Diplomacy will not stop them. The only thing that will stop Iran is knowing that if they continue to develop their nuclear program, the free world will use force.

Biden also said that Iranian nuclear capabilities threaten not only Israel and the United States, but the rest of the world.

The declaration also celebrates and adds to the U.S.-Israeli alliance in the context of partnerships with additional regional powers, providing the Biden administration with a positive outcome from his two-day trip to Israel as he prepares for what may prove the more challenging part of his Middle East visit: meetings with the heads of state of the Palestinian Authority and Saudi Arabia.

Released after a 50-minute meeting between the two leaders, the declaration also makes some new commitments, such as to a four-way strategic cooperation among Israel, the United States, India and the United Arab Emirates.

The joint Jerusalem Declaration speaks of the unshakeable U.S. commitment to Israels security, and especially to the maintenance of its qualitative military edge, a term long in use in international discussion of Israeli military power.

The United States reiterates its steadfast commitment to preserve and strengthen Israels capability to deter its enemies and to defend itself by itself against any threat or combination of threats, the declaration says, and further reiterates that these commitments are bipartisan and sacrosanct, and that they are not only moral commitments, but also strategic commitments that are vitally important to the national security of the United States itself.

Integral to this, the declaration also states, is the commitment never to allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon, and that it is prepared to use all elements of its national power to ensure that outcome.

The United States will confront Irans aggression and destabilizing activities, whether advanced directly or through proxies and terrorist organizations such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, the document says.

Israel thanks the United States for its ongoing and extensive support for deepening and broadening the historic Abraham Accords, the 2020 accords that paved the way to the establishment of diplomatic relations between Israel and the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Morocco.

For its part, the United States welcomes these developments and is committed to continue playing an active role in efforts to deepen the ties between Israel and all of its regional partners and to expand the circle of peace to include ever more Arab and Muslim States, the declaration also states.

Unusually for a diplomatic paper, the declaration also features references to spiritual elements of Judaism. The United States and Israel affirm that among the values the countries share is an unwavering commitment to democracy, the rule of law, and the calling of Tikkun Olam, the Hebrew term meaning repairing the world that has come to stand in for social justice.

Its not a defense pact, but it amounts to the same thing, Yitzhak Eldan, a former head of protocol at the Israeli foreign ministry and a former head of its diplomat academy, told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency about the declaration. In diplomatic terms, this is a warm, long and heartfelt embrace and one that is not lost on our enemies and new allies in the Middle East, Eldan added.

Following his warm reception in Israel, Bidens visit to Bethlehem in the West Bank on Friday is off to a rocky start. Amid disagreements between Bidens team and that of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, the two leaders will not be delivering a joint statement at the end of the meeting, as is customary for such meetings.

Instead, they will each give a separate statement, Palestinian officials told Haaretz, due to disagreements on the Palestinian side with some of the wording that Bidens team insisted be in a joint statement, according to that report.

Biden referenced the United States commitment to a two-state solution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict during his first speech in Israel, at Ben Gurion Airport. He also asked Lapid during their meeting not to surprise the United States with any moves concerning the Palestinians, Ynet reported.

Earlier in the day, Biden and Lapid participated in a video call with the leaders of India and the United Arab Emirates, Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan and Narendra Modi. The meeting, in which Biden and Lapid sat side by side at a conference room at the Waldorf Astoria hotel in Jerusalem, ended with a joint statement on deepening research and development cooperation between the countries, including on food security and sustainable energy.

This gives Biden achievements under his belt as he continues to Saudi Arabia for a meeting that is at best going forward in challenging circumstances, Eldan said.

In Saudi Arabia, Biden will meet with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the countrys de facto leader, who is believed to have been behind the 2018 murder of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi in Turkey.

The visit, which Biden has taken flak for at home, comes amid preexisting disagreements between Saudi and American officials on Iran. The Biden administration is interested in reaching a diplomatic agreement with the Islamic Republic on limiting its nuclear activities. But Saudi and Israeli officials have criticized the terms of the nuclear deal that the United States brokered, then left, in the past, warning Iran cannot be trusted to honor it.

Biden has described bin Salmans alleged role in Khashoggis death as outrageous.

His visit to Saudi Arabia, a major exporter of petroleum, is taking place amid high fossil fuel prices. Biden is expected to ask the Saudis to up production to counter rising gas prices, particularly given his effort to reduce reliance on Russian oil after that country initiated a war against Ukraine.

Original post:

Biden and Lapid jointly pledge to deny Iran weapons, but they diverge on the details - JTA News - Jewish Telegraphic Agency

Names of the Holocaust – Wikipedia

Posted By on July 14, 2022

Names of the Holocaust vary based on context. "The Holocaust" is the name commonly applied in English since the mid-1940s to the systematic extermination of 6 million Jews by Nazi Germany during World WarII. The term is also used more broadly to include the Nazi Party's systematic murder of millions of people in other groups they determined were "untermensch" or "subhuman," which included primarily the Jews and the Slavs, the former having allegedly infected the latter, including ethnic Poles, the Serbs, Russians, the Czechs and others.

Other groups targeted for racial and other reasons were the Romani people, Balts (especially Lithuanians), people with disabilities, gay men, and political and religious opponents,[1] which would bring the total number of Holocaust victims to 17 million people.[2] In Judaism, Shoah (), meaning "calamity" in Hebrew, became the standard term for the 20th-century Holocaust[2] (see Yom HaShoah).

The word "holocaust" originally derived from the Koine Greek word holokauston, meaning "a completely (holos) burnt (kaustos) sacrificial offering," or "a burnt sacrifice offered to a god." In Hellenistic religion, gods of the earth and underworld received dark animals, which were offered by night and burnt in full. The word holocaust was later adopted in Greek translations of the Torah to refer to the olah,[3] standard communal and individual sacrificial burnt offerings that Jews were required[4] to make in the times of the Temple in Jerusalem. In its Latin form, holocaustum, the term was first used with specific reference to a massacre of Jewish people by the chroniclers Roger of Howden[5] and Richard of Devizes in England in the 1190s.[6]

The earliest use of the word holocaust to denote a massacre recorded by the Oxford English Dictionary dates from 1833 when the journalist Leitch Ritchie, describing the wars of Louis VII of France[citation needed], wrote figuratively that he "once made a holocaust of thirteen hundred persons in a church" where they had gone to seek refuge when the town of Vitry-le-Franois was burned by Louis' troops in 1142. The English poet John Milton had used the word as a poetic description of the self-immolation of a phoenix in his 1671 poem Samson Agonistes,.[7][8][9]

In the late 19th century, holocaust was used in 1895 by the American newspaper The New York Times to describe the Ottoman massacre of Armenian Christians.[10] In the early twentieth century, possibly the first to use the term was journalist Melville Chater in 1925, to describe the burning and sacking of Smyrna in 1922 in the context of the Turkish genocide against Anatolian Christians.[11][12] Winston Churchill (in 1929 [13][14]) and other contemporary writers used it before World War II to describe the Armenian genocide of World War I.[15] The Armenian Genocide is referenced in the title of a 1922 poem "The Holocaust" (published as a booklet) and the 1923 book "The Smyrna Holocaust" deals with arson and massacre of Armenians.[16] Before the Second World War, the possibility of another war was referred to as "another holocaust" (that is, a repeat of the First World War). With reference to the events of the war, writers in English from 1945 used the term in relation to events such as the fire-bombing of Dresden or Hiroshima, or the effects of a nuclear war, although from the 1950s onwards, it was increasingly used in English to refer to the Nazi genocide of the European Jews (or Judeocide).

By the late 1950s, documents translated from Hebrew sometimes used the word "Holocaust" to translate "Shoah" as the Nazi Judeocide. This use can be found as early as May 23, 1943 in The New York Times, on page E6, in an article by Julian Meltzer, referring to feelings in Palestine about Jewish immigration of refugees from "the Nazi holocaust."

One significant early use was in a 1958 recollection by Leslie Hardman, the first Jewish British Army Chaplain to enter Bergen-Belsen concentration camp in April 1945, where he ministered to survivors and supervised the burial of about 20,000 victims,

Towards me came what seemed to be the remnants of a holocaust a staggering mass of blackened skin and bones, held together somehow with filthy rags. 'My God, the dead walk', I cried aloud, but I did not recognise my voice... [peering] at the double star, the emblem of Jewry on my tunic - one poor creature touched and then stroked the badge of my faith, and finding that it was real murmured, 'Rabbiner, Rabbiner'.[17]

By the late 1960s, the term was starting to be used in this sense without qualification. Nora Levin's 1968 book The Holocaust: The Destruction of European Jewry, 1933-1945 explains the meaning in its subtitle, but uses the unmoderated phrase "The Holocaust". An article called "Moral Trauma and the Holocaust" was published in the New York Times on February 12, 1968.[18] However, it was not until the late 1970s that the Nazi genocide became the generally accepted conventional meaning of the word, when used unqualified and with a capital letter, a usage that also spread to other languages for the same period.[19] The 1978 television miniseries titled "Holocaust" and starring Meryl Streep is often cited as the principal contributor to establishing the current usage in the wider culture.[20] "Holocaust" was selected as the Association for the German Language's Word of the Year in 1979, reflecting increased public consciousness of the term.

The term became increasingly widespread as a synonym for "genocide" in the last decades of the 20th century to refer to mass murders in the form "X holocaust" (e.g. "Rwandan holocaust"). Examples are Rwanda, Ukraine under Stalin, and the actions of the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia.

In order to suggest comparison with Nazi murders other historical events have also been labeled "Holocausts", for example the oppression of lower caste groups in India ("Sudra Holocaust") or the slave trade ("African Holocaust").

Some people find the use of "holocaust" for the WWII-period Nazi extermination of Jews unacceptable, on account of the theological and historical nature of the word "holocaust".[21] The American historian Walter Laqueur (whose parents were murdered in the Holocaust) has argued that the term "Holocaust" is a "singularly inappropriate" term for the genocide of the Jews as it implies a "burnt offering" to God.[22] Laqueur wrote, "It was not the intention of the Nazis to make a sacrifice of this kind and the position of the Jews was not that of a ritual victim".[22] The British historian Geoff Eley wrote in a 1982 essay entitled "Holocaust History" that he thought the term Holocaust implies "a certain mystification, an insistence on the uniquely Jewish character of the experience".[22]

While the terms Shoah and Final Solution always refer to the fate of the Jews during the Nazi rule, the term Holocaust is sometimes used in a wider sense to describe other genocides of the Nazi and other regimes.

The Columbia Encyclopedia defines "Holocaust" as "name given to the period of persecution and extermination of European Jews by Nazi Germany".[23] The Compact Oxford English Dictionary[24] and Microsoft Encarta[25] give similar definitions. The Encyclopdia Britannica defines "Holocaust" as "the systematic state-sponsored killing of six million Jewish men, women and children, and millions of others by Nazi Germany and its collaborators during World War II",[26] although the article goes on to say, "The Nazis also singled out the Roma (Gypsies). They were the only other group that the Nazis systematically killed in gas chambers alongside the Jews."[26]

Scholars are divided on whether the term Holocaust should be applied to all victims of Nazi mass murder, with some using it synonymously with Shoah or "Final Solution of the Jewish Question", and others including the killing of Romani people, imprisonment and exection of homosexual men, euthanasia of the disabled, execution of the Poles, the execution of Soviet prisoners of war, murder of political opponents, and the persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses.[27]

CzechoslovakIsraeli historian Yehuda Bauer, stated: "Let us be clear: Shoah, Churban, Judeocide, whatever we call it, is the name we give to the attempted planned total physical annihilation of the Jewish people, and its partial perpetration with the murder of most of the Jews of Europe." He also contends that the Holocaust should include only Jews because it was the intent of the Nazis to exterminate all Jews, while the other groups were not to be totally annihilated.[28]Inclusion of non-Jewish victims of the Nazis in the Holocaust is objected to by many persons including, and by organizations such as Yad Vashem, an Israeli state institution in Jerusalem established in 1953 to commemorate the victims of the Holocaust.[29] They say that the word was originally meant to describe the extermination of the Jews, and that the Jewish Holocaust was a crime on such a scale, and of such totality and specificity, as the culmination of the long history of European antisemitism, that it should not be subsumed into a general category with the other crimes of the Nazis.[29]

However, Nobel laureate and Jewish Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel considered non-Jewish victims to be Holocaust victims, declaring to President Jimmy Carter, "Not all the victims of the Holocaust were Jews, but all Jews were victims," when he asked his support for a national Holocaust museum in Washington.[30]

British historian Michael Burleigh and German historian Wolfgang Wippermann maintain that although all Jews were victims, the Holocaust transcended the confines of the Jewish community other people shared the tragic fate of victimhood.[31] Hungarian former Minister for Roma Affairs Lszl Teleki applies the term Holocaust to both the murder of Jews and Romani peoples by the Nazis.[32] In The Columbia Guide to the Holocaust, American historians Donald Niewyk and Francis Nicosia use the term to include Jews, Romani and the disabled.[33] American historian Dennis Reinhartz has claimed that Gypsies were the main victims of genocide in Croatia and Serbia during the Second World War, and has called this "the Balkan Holocaust 1941-1945".[34]

The "Final Solution to the Jewish Question" (German: Endlsung der Judenfrage) was the Nazis' own term, recorded in the minutes of the Wannsee Conference on 20 January 1942, and translated into English for the Nuremberg Trials in 1945.[35] Before the word "Holocaust" became normative this phrase was also used by writers in English. For example, in William Shirer's The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, the genocide is described as "The Final Solution" (in quotation marks; the word "Holocaust" is not mentioned).[36] In both English and German, "Final Solution" has been widely used as an alternative to "Holocaust".[37] Whereas the term "Holocaust" is now often used to include all casualties of the Nazi death camps and murder squads, the "Final Solution" refers exclusively to "the attempt to annihilate the Jewish people," as defined at the site of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. For a time after World War II, German historians also used the term Vlkermord ("genocide"), or in full, der Vlkermord an den Juden ("the genocide of the Jewish people"), while the prevalent term in Germany today is either Holocaust or increasingly Shoah.

The biblical word Shoah (), also spelled Shoa and Sho'ah, meaning "calamity" in Hebrew (and also used to refer to "destruction" since the Middle Ages), became the standard Hebrew term for the 20th-century Holocaust as early as the early 1940s.[3] In recent literature it is specifically prefixed with Ha ("The" in Hebrew) when referring to Nazi mass-murders, for the same reason that "holocaust" becomes "The Holocaust". It may be spelled Ha-Shoah or HaShoah, as in Yom HaShoah, the annual Jewish "Holocaust and Heroism Remembrance Day".

Shoah had earlier been used in the context of the Nazis as a translation of "catastrophe". For example, in 1934, when Chaim Weizmann told the Zionist Action Committee that Hitler's rise to power was "an unforeseen catastrophe, comparable to another world war" (German: "unvorhergesehene Katastrophe, etwa ein neuer Weltkrieg"), the Hebrew press translated Katastrophe as Shoah.[38] In the spring of 1942, the Jerusalem historian BenZion Dinur (Dinaburg) used Shoah in a book published by the United Aid Committee for the Jews in Poland to describe the extermination of Europe's Jews, calling it a "catastrophe" that symbolized the unique situation of the Jewish people.[39][40] The word Shoah was chosen in Israel to describe the Holocaust, the term institutionalized by the Knesset on April 12, 1951, when it established Yom Ha-Shoah Ve Mered Ha-Getaot, the national day of remembrance. In the 1950s, Yad Vashem, the Israel "Holocaust Martyrs' and Heroes' Remembrance Authority" was routinely translating this into English as "the Disaster". At that time, holocaust was often used to mean the conflagration of much of humanity in a nuclear war.[41] Since then, Yad Vashem has changed its practice; the word "Holocaust", usually now capitalized, has come to refer principally to the genocide of the European Jews.[38][42] The Israeli historian Saul Friedlnder wrote in 1987 of "the growing centrality of the Shoah for Jewish communities in the Diaspora" and that "The Shoah is almost becoming a symbol of identification, for better or for worse, whether because of the weakening of the bond of religion or because of the lesser salience of Zionism and Israel as an identification element".[22] The British historian Richard J. Evans wrote in 1989 that the term Holocaust was unsuitable, and should not be used.[22]

Khurbn eyrope ( ) "Destruction of Europe", is the term for the Holocaust in Yiddish. The term uses the word khurbn (colloquially spelled "churban"), a loanword: Hebrew: urbn "destruction". urbn and khurbn are used in Hebrew and Yiddish to describe the destruction of Solomon's Temple and the destruction of the Second Temple. Max Kaufmann's early (1947) history of the genocide in Latvia was called Khurbn Letland, that is, The Destruction of the Jews of Latvia.[43] Published later, Raul Hilberg's most important work was The Destruction of the European Jews.[44]

The Porajmos (also Porrajmos) literally "Devouring", or Samudaripen ("Mass killing") is a term adopted by the Romani historian Ian Hancock to describe attempts by the Nazis to exterminate most of the Romani peoples of Europe. The phenomenon has been little studied.

Though most countries adopted translations or otherwise transliterations of the term "Holocaust" or "Shoah" (e.g. Spanish: Holocausto; Russian: Holokost; Czech: oa; etc.), there are instances where certain populations, often those who were affected by the Holocaust itself, have adopted 'unique' names to denote the event. In Polish, for instance, the Holocaust is often referred to as Zagada ydw,[45][46] or "Destruction of the Jews", although Holokaust is used in more general contexts. In Sweden, the Holocaust is most commonly called Frintelsen ("the annihiliation"), a term etymologically similar to the German word Vernichtung, used in Hitler's prophecy from his 30 January 1939 Reichstag speech.

See more here:

Names of the Holocaust - Wikipedia

Israel and Austria Sign Strategic Pact to Upgrade Relations, Talk Iran Threat and Antisemitism – Algemeiner

Posted By on July 14, 2022

Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid and Austrian Chancellor Karl Nehammer on Tuesday signed a comprehensive strategic partnership to boost cooperation in areas including security, cyber and counter-terrorism, and green tech.

Signing this agreement is an important moment in the great history we have between our peoples, which will take relations between Israel and Austria to new heights, Lapid stated at the signing ceremony in Tel Aviv.

The two leaders first met privately and then held an expanded meeting with staff, during which Lapid thanked Nehammer for his support of Israel in both the European Union and multilateral fora.

They discussed security challenges as well as regional issues, with a focus on threats posed by Iran and talks to revive the 2015 nuclear agreement between Tehran and world powers, several rounds of which were hosted in Vienna before reaching an impasse.

The pair also spoke about Russias war in Ukraine and its implications for the Middle East, and steps to deepen Israeli-Austrian cooperation to fight antisemitism and preserve the memory of the Holocaust. The visit comes after Nehammer in January apologized on behalf of Austria to Lapid for the crimes committed at the Nazis Mauthausen concentration camp.

Lapid recounted that when he was asked after taking office as caretaker prime minister to name the most exciting moment over the past year, his answer was ready: The most emotional moment I had was with you in Mauthausen concentration camp when you told me that on behalf of the people of Austria, you apologize for the killing of my grandfather who died there.

I didnt know it at the time, my mother was watching this at home and she cried. She told me she cried like a child, he added. It shows how much you care for this relationship and how much you care for making sure people understand what happened there, in what is known as the other planet, and this is something I will never forget.

At a commemoration event at the Yad Vashem World Holocaust Remembrance Center in Jerusalem, Nehammer emphasized Austrias historical responsibility for the atrocities of the Shoah, announcing that the government would fund the memorials projects with 1.5 million euros through 2024.

Original post:

Israel and Austria Sign Strategic Pact to Upgrade Relations, Talk Iran Threat and Antisemitism - Algemeiner

Asserting Israel’s legitimacy then and now – JNS.org – JNS.org

Posted By on July 14, 2022

(July 11, 2022 / JNS) My organization, Im Tirtzu, has been pleased to partner with Canadians for Israels Legal Rights (CILR)and I have been privileged to personally take partin a series of highly informative webinars tracing the legal pillars that helped erect and stabilize the State of Israel.

Starting with the Balfour Declaration in 1917 to the San Remo Declaration in 1920 and the League of Nations Mandate for Palestine in 1922, we can see a steady progression of aspirations, declarations and then formal mandates that enshrined and nurtured a Jewish presence, nay, a homeland in historic Eretz Yisrael.

We can discuss and debate the motivations and the thinking behind the great powers decision to carve out and designate a sovereign land for the Jewish people. However, guilt was not part of the equation. What todays anti-Zionists like to point tothe idea that Israel was created out of Western guilt for the Holocaustwas, of course, completely irrelevant during the 20-plus years preceding the Shoah.

What was visible for all to see was the desire for nation-building by the Western powers in the wake of the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire, and a sense that, following Herzl, the so-called Jewish question might best be addressed through normalizing the status of Jews by transforming them from a stateless people to a people with its homeland and sovereignty restored.

Besides the actions of the European and Japanese victors of World War I, one will find the enormous and heroic efforts of Jewish Zionists to focus world leaders on the critical task at hand.

Subscribe to The JNS Daily Syndicateby email and never missour top stories

What our Jewish heroes had was vision, tenacity and genius. (Many of us would also say that they had divine providence helping then to be effective and impactful.) What they did not have was power. They had no inherent ability to effect nor to create any reality. Decisions as to what was to happen were out of their control and left solely to others.

Fast forward 100 years and see what a difference a century makes.

Today, Israel is not only a sovereign country, but an astounding success. We have gone from the state that, per the best and brightest in the U.S. State Department, was destined to either fail or be on permanent life support, to a growing regional force with an economy that focuses on providing the world with innovative products in a variety of industries.

In short, today Israel has power.

What is not always clear, however, is whether Israel has resolve, including the resolve to assert and defend its own legitimacy. Israels leadership understandably sees the country as a given, a going concern, a fact on the ground.

Defending the country can sound defensive, and Israelis dont like to be defensive or invoke anything that reeks of victimhood.

This is understandable and commendable. However, there is still a lot of room for reminding the world about our biblical, historical and geopolitical legitimacy, a legitimacy that was the consensus of the world despite the wall-to-wall opposition to Israel in the Arab world.

Ironically, we are seeing something of a global role reversal, one that demands the Israeli leadership pay more attention to the need to assert our legitimacy.

Today, more and more Arab countriespreviously die-hard rejectionistsare extending the hand of normalization and even, in some cases, friendship to Israel. This is both breathtaking and likely to be the precursor to even more relationships with the Arab and Muslim world.

Similarly, the once hardcore rejectionist attitude to Israel taken by counties like India and to a lesser extent Japan have given rise to sincere and important friendships.

Conversely, the Western consensus that was instrumental in providing Israel with foundational legitimacy is corroding. Anti-Israel sentiment is rising in Western Europe and the United States, countries that should be our natural allies as democratic bulwarks.

One sees European governments speaking out of both sides of their mouths, expressing pro forma support for Israel while simultaneously funding initiatives in Area C of Judea and Samaria that have, as their ultimate goal, the replacement of Israel by Palestinians.

European and progressive American support for Palestinian aspirations is giving aid and comfort to a political ideology that is not two-state oriented, but displacement- and supersession-oriented.

Ironically, it is to these historical and long-time supporters, indeed patrons, of the State of Israel, that clear messaging must be delivered. Messages that say Israel is the owner and not the occupier of all that we inhabit: Israel within the Green Line and Israel in Judea and Samaria.

If we ultimately cede any of it, it will be because we as sovereigns have decided to do so. But what we might cede will have always been ours, and the decision will be ours alone.

In the meantime, attempts to portray us as colonialist occupiers or practitioners of apartheid are indirect but nevertheless powerful attempts to delegitimize Israel.

Our leaders need to connect the dots and should not differentiate between Western plans to create a de facto Palestinian state in Judea and Samaria from the reality that such a plan is just a way station to the dismantling of Israel itself.

Today, the assertion of Israels legal rights is both a reminder of the history of our founding and the recognition that those rights empower us and firmly place Israel on the right side of law, justice and sovereignty.

Douglas Altabef is the Chairman of the Board of Im Tirtzu, Israels largest grassroots Zionist organization. He is also a director of Byadenu and the Israel Independence Fund. He can be reached at dougaltabef@gmail.com.

Link:

Asserting Israel's legitimacy then and now - JNS.org - JNS.org

Israeli Food is so Jewish, Here’s Why – aish.com Jewlish, Food 4 Thought, Featured – Aish.com

Posted By on July 14, 2022

The foods that make up the Israeli cuisine tell the story of the Jewish people.

People are falling in love with Israeli food more and more these days as Israeli food culture becomes widely known around the world for its unique mix of tastes and colors, smells and spices.

But what makes Israeli food specifically Israeli?

Is falafel Israeli? What about bourekas or hummus? Is there anything specifically Jewish about the food eaten in the Jewish state?

Lets explore.

Now, there are a lot of reasons people love Israel. The history, the beauty, the special feeling you feel being there. And, again, the food.

But why? How could the food in tiny little Israel compare or compete with food cultures in other countries much bigger and much older than it?

The answer, I think, is the story behind the food, which is really the inspiring story of the Jewish people returning home after 2000 years of exile.

You see, Israeli food isnt uniquely Israeli. If I walk the streets of Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, or Haifa and Beersheva, Ill find all kinds of foods that I can find in other parts of the world.

Bourekas? From Turkey.

Shakshuka? Northern Africa.

Hummus? Eaten for centuries around the Middle East before the creation of Israel in 1948.

Jachnun? Yemenite.

And dont tell Israelis this but most food experts agree that falafel is originally from Egypt!

Its interesting to note that oftentimes Jews in these countries made these local traditional foods uniquely Jewish in some kind of way. For example, Yemenite Jews ate jachnun on Shabbat morning after prayers (and in Israel many of them still do) because its a dish that is left to cook overnight for many hours.

And, to Israels credit, it was in Israel that falafel was served for the first time in a pita, becoming the classic food icon that it is today.

Now, the only reason these foods are now part of the Israeli cuisine is because these were the foods Jews cooked and ate in their corners of the Diaspora. And when the gates of the Jewish state were opened wide in 1948 and Jews from the four corners of the Earth traveled by boat, by plane and even by foot to return home, they brought with them their cultures including their languages, styles of dress, music and unique Jewish traditions, as well as their beloved foods.

Turkish Jews ate bourekas in Turkey, Moroccan Jews ate shakshuka in Morocco, Yemenite Jews ate jachnun in Yemen and Jews around the Middle East ate hummus (probably really good hummus).

I should pay some respect to my own family roots in Eastern Europe where Eastern European Jews ate gefilte fish, though that one didn't quite make it into Israel's cuisine. I guess some things are best left in the past.

Like many immigrant populations, the returning Jews continued to cook and eat these same foods in Israel as well. And instead of disappearing over time, like sometimes happens, they became part and parcel of the mainstream food culture and Israelis of different geographic backgrounds became exposed to each others food traditions. And together, from the Yemenite to the Moroccan to the Ethiopian to the European to the Iraqi, these foods became the Israeli food culture, one of the worlds most unique and inspiring food cultures, the likes of which has never been seen in Jewish history.

Theres one more piece to this story, though, and its this piece that I think makes Israeli cuisine so Jewish.

The founder of the 18th century Hasidic movement, the Baal Shem Tov, taught that the reason the Jewish people went into exile from Israel in the first place was to collect positive aspects from all around the world and then bring them back to Israel.

Now, the Baal Shem Tov probably didnt have in mind that this would happen in the form of food! But if we think about it, the foods of the world are some of the greatest things we could bring back to Israel with us. For food is so intertwined with our lives, our festivals, our celebrations, and our life cycle events. Its through food that we come together and create stronger family bonds and communities. And, now, also nationhood, something the Jewish people lacked for 2000 years.

The foods that make up the Israeli cuisine tell the story of the Jewish people, of the places weve been and the lives we lived before having the great merit to return home. And in Israel these foods have combined to create a food culture that is part of a larger culture that is simultaneously a reflection of these experiences of the Jewish past and something that is entirely new, never seen before in Jewish history.

We especially see this in the way many Israeli chefs have taken the traditional foods and recipes of the Jewish Diaspora and have redefined them using local ingredients and creating new food combinations, taking the best of what was in the past with the best that we have today to create a food culture that is a mix of old and new, traditional and modern, east and west.

And, in that way, we can say that Israeli food is the most Jewish food of all.

Originally posted here:

Israeli Food is so Jewish, Here's Why - aish.com Jewlish, Food 4 Thought, Featured - Aish.com

Old Bay on Everything: How the Crab Seasoning is Taking Over – Washingtonian

Posted By on July 14, 2022

Its midafternoon on a Thursday when I arrive at Crabtowne USA, a downmarket, 70s-era crab house on the side of a six-lane highway behind BWI. At 3:30, people are already bibbed out and hammering at crab shells with wooden mallets, a soft percussive clatter beneath the Goo Goo Dolls song that ricochets off the walls.

Crabtowne isnt a destinationyou wont find it in a Beltway crab roundup, Guy Fieri doesnt drop byso everyone here is local. Theres an older white couple in corporate fleeces, a couple of Black guys watching the Nats, a woman with missing teeth, a woman in cat-eye glasses and a Dolly Parton shirt, and her child, who runs over requesting more quarters for the pinball arcade out back.

Its a diverse crowd, but what they shareliterally down to the personis a fanatical love of Old Bay. I know because I asked them. I circled the dining room, which is lined with glossy photos of Atlantic blue crabs, to inquire about the beloved regional spice. A representative response came from a guy presiding over a pile of 24 desiccated crab carcasses. I feel like I was born with Old Bay in my veins, he said. Like, I came out cracking crabs.

Marylanders have loved Old Bay for generations, but lately things have escalated. In the past few years, everyone in the blast radius of the Chesapeake has been bombarded with Old Bay content: Old Bay hot sauce, Old Bay beer, Old Bay bikinis and socks and Christmas sweaters, the Old Bay mascot dancing on TikTokthe list goes on.

So how did Old Bay migrate from the back of the pantry to the top of everyones feed? Well, the seasoning began to appear in other productsin vodka or on Goldfish crackersand it melted Marylands mind. This cross-promotional blitz has solved a nettlesome marketing problem: While beloved, Old Bay hasnt always been easy to sell. Its hyperlocal and a bit esotericits regional quirks dont translate to national mass-media campaigns.

Old Bay Goldfish had more than a billion impressions within 48 hours of its launchequivalent to one-eighth of the human population scrolling by.

Old Bay sells best by word of mouth, and lately everyone is talking about it. The story of the Old Bay brand renaissance is one part ingenious viral marketing and many parts people like Kyle, the youngish white guy sitting next to me at the Crabtowne bar. Hes wearing an Os cap and drinking a pitcher of beer by himself, and when I ask if he loves Old Bay, he gives me the side-eye. Slowly, in the tone of a man whos been body-snatched, he replies, Well, we all love Old Bay.

I mean, honestly, he adds, it feels so stupid saying it because I have no stake in Old Bay, so why am I advertising this seasoning to you? But its delicious. Its such an intrinsic part of being a Marylander, its like its always been in my brain.

Kyle has sold it well, so when my server wanders by, I ask which menu items have Old Bay. The cream-of-crab soup? The Chesapeake wings? She looks a little sheepish. Those things have crab spice, she replies. My friends, Ive made a rookie mistake: Crabtowne uses J.O.

J.O. is the rival seasoning, a seafood blend that has many of the same ingredients but apparently sticks better to crabs. It was invented around the same time as Old Bay, and its also Baltimore-based. So why have some Marylanders never heard of J.O., while Old Bay has spawned a cult?

An obvious answer is that J.O. markets to restaurants, while Old Bay courts home consumers. But that fails to acknowledge the absurd power of the Old Bay brand. Marylanders love Old Bay for its sweet and salty heat, the cans handsome midcentury design, and its vibe of summertime pleasure, of crab feasts and trips to the shore. Its origin story is also the stuff of legend: In 1938, a German Jewish man fled the Nazis, boarding a steamship with his spice grinder in tow. Soon after landing in Baltimore, he created a regional jewel.

Whats in Old Bay is a little mysteriousits parent company, McCormick, is coy about the recipe, stating that its a proprietary blend of 18 herbs and spices. Todays can lists only celery salt, red pepper, black pepper, and paprika, but a pre-McCormick can at the Baltimore Museum of Industry also lists mustard seed, pimento, cloves, bay leaves, mace, cardamom, ginger, and cinnamon.

Thats only 12 of the 18 herbs and spices, but the recipe is beside the point. Whenever you have a signature seasoning, people will try to reverse-engineer it, explains Jill Pratt, chief marketing officer at McCormick. But even if they got close, what theyre missing is the brand impactit comes from the flavor, but it goes beyond the flavor. Its the feeling and the connection that people have with the brand.

In the Mid-Atlantic, we have Old Bay weddings and Halloween costumes. People knit Old Bay afghans and fly Old Bay flags. Theres a guy in Annapolis whose front door is painted like the Old Bay can. And then there are the tattoos. I mean, the number of images that we have in our repository of different Old Bay tattoos is shocking, Pratt says.

Aesthetically, these tattoos are all about the can, a Campbells-soup-meets-Mondrian design that dates to the 1950s. Its the can thats iconic to people, Pratt saysalthough from time to time, a new hire at McCormick will look at it and say, You know what we should do? That looks dated, and we should redesign it. Whenever that happens, Pratt jokes, that person immediately does not get to work on Old Bay anymore. They get moved to a different brand.

The can is synonymous with Old Bay, the engine of its nostalgic charm. Its design evokes Marylands salad days: abundant fisheries, sky-high industrial production, a thriving middle class. And for some, the design is an heirloomthe same style of can they grew up with, the one their parents and grandparents had. Even more than the recipe, the can embodies Old Bays history, which is central to the seasonings appeal.

Given Old Bays historical bent, youd think McCormick would get its dates right. But the can says the seasoning launched in 1939, while the son of Old Bays creator claims it was created in 1941.

In the collection of the Jewish Museum of Maryland are a 1980 oral-history interview with Old Bays creator, Gustav Brunn, plus the memoirs of Brunns son, Ralph. According to them, Gustav Brunn started his career in Germany by selling animal hides, then moved to sausage casings, then to wholesale spices. Eventually, he created a line of seasoning blends for sausage makers, which became the centerpiece of his firm.

But in the 1930s, Hitlers ascent upended the Brunns lives: During Kristallnacht, Nazis terrorized their Frankfurt neighborhood, and the very next day, police arrested Brunn and took him to Buchenwald. According to Ralph, the family knew of a lawyer who could extract a prisoner from the camps for an extravagant fee. They paid, and after 16 days, Brunn returned home. The terrified family packed their belongingsincluding Brunns spice grinderand set sail for the United States.

In late 1938, they landed in Baltimore, and after a few months of searching for work, Brunn got a job developing sausage seasonings for McCormick. He was fired after two or three daysBrunn says for his poor English, while Ralph insists the firing was anti-Semitic. Finally, in September 1939, Brunn struck out on his own. In a small room by the Inner Harbor, he set up the Baltimore Spice Company, initially selling pickling spices, sausage blends, and wholesale spices. Among his clients were seafood merchants who made their own seasoning blends for crabs.

Its not that African Americans necessarily invented it, Michael W. Twitty says of Old Bay. But without us, the story is impossible.

The flavor of these crab blends dates back to Colonial America, when a popular all-purpose seasoning was kitchen peppera blend that commonly included nutmeg, cloves, cinnamon, cardamom, allspice, ginger, black pepper, and mace. Culinary historian Michael W. Twitty says enslaved West Africans were probably the first to start putting kitchen pepper on shellfish. In his travels on the western coast of Africa, Twitty saw that theres always a peppery, salty kind of thing that you eat crustaceans with. Its always with a hot condimentits never just plain.

Twitty believes that generations of cooking shellfish with kitchen pepper evolved into the crab-spice blends common in the Chesapeake when Gustav Brunn came on the scene. Its not that African Americans necessarily invented it, he says of Old Bay. But without us, the story is impossible.

Initially, Gustav Brunns creation was not a commercial success; everyone in the Baltimore crab scene already had a seasoning recipe they thought was the best in town, so nobody bought Old Bay. (It was then called the Delicious Brand Shrimp and Crab Seasoning, a mouthful of a name that Brunn later changed in homage to a Chesapeake steamship.) Eventually, Brunn unloaded a few pounds of Old Bay on a seafood wholesaler around the corner. From there, word spread.

Eighty years later, Old Bays marketing hasnt fundamentally changed. We dont spend much money on advertising, Pratt says. Old Bay is really a word-of-mouth brand. She clarifies that this is strategicMcCormick is not being lazy. The media loves to cover Old Bay, and fans love to post about it. So thats how Old Bay grows naturally, she says, because people love to talk about the brand.

Even offline, this seems true: At Crabtowne, everyone is chattering about the Goldfish, which debuted just three days before. Kyle heard about them from his dad, and Derrick heard from a coworker, a waterman on the Eastern Shore. A group of nurses scrolled past the Goldfish online. Everything they put Old Bay on, you have to try it, one of them says.

Old Bay Goldfish werent even McCormicks ideaaccording to Pratt, it came from their social channels: People were saying, If I was an executive at Pepperidge Farm, I would take Old Bay and put it all over Goldfish and Id earn billions of dollars. The drumbeat in the comments grew, and then came a Change.org petition, so McCormick made the astute business decision to cave.

You have to find a way to delight people every once in a while, and you can do that with unexpected partnerships, Pratt explains. It expands the reach of the brand to new folks, and it also actually makes the superfans even more superfansit gives them another way to share what they love.

By share what they love, she means posting incessantly about Old Bay online, which people are definitely doing. Old Bay Goldfish had more than a billion social- and traditional-media impressions within 48 hours of its launch, Pratt saysroughly equivalent to one-eighth of the human population scrolling by. Even if the Old Bay social account stopped right now, says David Wassell, chief creative officer at the Baltimore ad agency MGH, you would still have a shitload of Old Bay content out there, just because people love the brand.

Strategically, this is a godsend for Old Bay, which is an unusually tricky brand to market. You go into any home in the greater Baltimore area and theres got to be an Old Bay can in a cupboard somewhere, is how Wassell describes the brands Achilles heel. These people arent buying Old Bay, because they already have itand if theyre using it only, say, for steaming their own crabs, then theyre probably not using much at all.

Ten years ago, in the predawn of the Old Bay brand renaissance, there was actually a big debate as far as what is the right way to grow Old Bay, Pratt recalls. Was it to have people in the region that already loved it buy more? Or was it better to aggressively push to other regions?

They began with Baltimore, tapping MGH to spearhead the 2012 Summer of Baytriotism campaign. MGH ran a contest in theBaltimore Sun,looking for the voice of Baltimore. Baltimoreans submitted clips of their accents, and the winner was Marianne Handlir, a stay-at-home mom from Highlandtown who spoke quintessential Bawlmerese. As her prize, she voiced a series of Old Bay radio spots highlighting the citys quirky linguistic terroir: Like you, Old Bay is proud to call Bawlmer home, Handlir said with her peppy, awkward vowels.

These ads for the Baltimore marketquirky, hyperlocal, surprising, funfelt true to the brand, but they were hardly expanding its reach. So in 2016, McCormick pitched Old Bay to farther-flung markets. To be intelligible in Raleigh or Virginia Beach, madcap Bawlmerese became the staid Excite Your Seafood. At the campaigns center was a fleet of food trucks that traversed the Eastern Seaboard, passing out samples and swag and educating new consumers on the merits of Mid-Atlantic crab spice.

Excite Your Seafood did expand Old Bays audience, but it struck Pratt that, as you start to water down the message to make it feel appropriate in Atlanta, the brand starts to lose some of its specialness. The temptation with a beloved brand like Old Bay, she says, is How can we scale it as fast as possible? Like, lets advertise the hell out of it and make it as big as we can this year. But thats a precarious path.

Kyle from Crabtowne puts it best: When something is specifically regional, people key in to that. Its a secret weirdo thing that only they know about, because its only from there. The most passionate Old Bay fans feel like they know a secret, and you dont learn secrets from billboards on I-95.

Amid this marketing morass, McCormick bumped into an unconventional idea: An employee at Flying Dog Brewery pitched an Old Bay beer. To Pratt, this just made sense. Flying Dog was an ideal collaboratora cool, young Maryland brandand the mix of Old Bay and beer was kismet: All thats missing is crabs. Flying Dog named the ale Dead Rise for the type of crabbing boat that most Chesapeake watermen use.

Dead Rise rolled out in 2014, as part of Old Bays 75th-anniversary celebration, and it stole the show. The beer was a viral sensation that made it difficult to keep store shelves stocked, recalls Ben Savage, chief marketing officer at Flying Dog. Thats when it clicked for McCormick: A good brand partnership can have global reach without the overeager corporate vibe of a traditional ad campaign. Partnerships are the ducks of marketing: Underwater, theyre furiously propelling the brand, but on the surface, they appear not to be marketing at all.

I keep Old Bay with the salt and pepper on the table, one woman tells me. I put it on everything, says almost everyone else.

Dead Rise had an additional salubrious effect: It helped people see Old Bay as more than just a crab spice. Elliot Spaisman, cofounder of DCs Astro Doughnuts & Fried Chicken, remembers the summer that Dead Rise appeared. People were running around looking for that everywhere, he says, which inspired him to launch a new menu item: a fried-chicken sandwich on an Old Bayflavored doughnut. When Astro launched it, Spaisman couldnt believe the lines and the crazinessit was cuckoo, he says.

Putting Old Bay in beer made the seasoning seem more versatileas Pratt puts it, Dead Rise expanded the flavor potential of the brand. Partnerships could show people that Old Bay goes on everything, rather than simply telling them. And people who put Old Bay on everything buy more cans.

Let me describe the moment when I realized the limitlessness of brand partnerships. Its early afternoon at Jimmys Famous Seafood, a storied crab haunt in industrial Baltimore, and Im trying not to get drunk. In front of me, I have an Old Bay Vodka Bloody Mary, a Bay Crush, some kind of Old Bay grapefruit drink, and a small glass of Old Bay Vodka, served neat.

Im with Greg David and Theda Backis, two of the makers of Old Bay Vodka. Greg is a former wrestler, an absolute brick of a man whose engorged biceps look like snakes swallowing multiple rodents at once. We wanted to have the quintessential Old Bay tastes, he says of the vodka, but it had to be subtle, something you could sip at room temperature without being like, ugh.

As hes explaining the vodka, Tony Minadakis, the owner of Jimmys Famous Seafood, wanders over to our table. He slaps Gregs hand, and they small-talk a minute. Then, out of nowhere, Tony asks, Hey, you want to take an Old Bay Vodka Sauce to retail?

Delirious, Greg blubbers, So hold on, manvodka sauce? Old Bay Vodka Sauce? Done. Ill call Rob up after this meeting. He clarifies that Rob is the licensing guy at McCormick, then he role-plays their conversation: Rob, were doing Old Bay Vodka Sauce. Okay, Greg, I love it.

Tony summons shots of Old Bay Vodka from the bar, which makes me think that this is an actual dealtheyre already discussing putting the vodka sauce on gnocchi. And as the Old Bay Vodka hits my throat (it starts with celery and finishes with pepper, a zesty, botanical feel), I begin to understand what has happened: Old Bay Vodka is made with Old Bay, while Old Bay Vodka Sauce would be made with Old Bay Vodka. Its brand partnerships all the way down.

So is the future of Old Bay an infinity mirror of brand partnerships? Thats not what McCormick envisions. Its ambitions are nakedly immodest: Ideally, we would like Old Bay to be the all-purpose seasoning on everybodys table that replaces spices, salt, and pepper, Pratt says.

For the patrons of Crabtowne, this seems to have already happened. I keep Old Bay right with the salt and pepper on the table, one woman tells me. I put it on everything, says almost everyone else.

To Pratt, its obvious why. Who doesnt want great-tasting food? she says. And we make it easier to get the flavors youre looking for, because weve already done the work of blending the 18 herbs and spices.

While this may seem like a lowbrow hack, at least one Michelin-starred chef agrees: Eric Ziebold, head chef at DCs Kinship and Mtier, considers Old Bay a desert-island food. I throw it into everything, he says. Its something that I always have at my house. Asked if Old Bay also appears on his restaurant menus, he replies, We use it pretty extensively. How much time do you have?

Ziebold has enlisted Old Bay in some real haute cuisine: a green-tomato gazpacho with a savory Old Bay sorbet, for instance. But his favorite Old Bay dish is a steak rub. He wheeled it out while competing on a special episode ofIron Chef Japanin 2013. I did what I call the Eastern Shore Barbecue, he explains. I took a rib eye, dusted it with Old Bay, and grilled it, then served it with succotash, corn velout, and smoked-tomato jam. Its based on having a summer grill-out on the Eastern Shore.

To Ziebold, Old Bays power comes from both its accessible flavor profile and its emotional appeal. Old Bay just screams summer, water, Chesapeake Bay, he says. The seasoning has actually become his anchor to the regionthough hes lived in DC for many years, he grew up in Iowa. I think having a sense of place is important. Old Bay makes me feel like Im a Mid-Atlantic person at heart.

At Jimmys Famous Seafood, I ask Greg David what Old Bay means to him, and he tells me a story. I was listening to the radio in Ocean City the other day, and they asked, What is the sense that makes you remember something the most? Well, its what you smell. For him, Old Bay is Marylands Proustian madeleine: Its been generationally in the cupboard forever. If youre cooking with Old Bay, you smell it when you walk in the door. It reminds people of home.

While Greg is waxing philosophical, Thedas phone dings. Its her twin sister, who has just invented the Frozen Old Bay Pineapple Sour. By now, I know unconventional marketing when I see itthis is a play for the tiki demographic, the folks who wont touch a Bloody Mary. But Theda hands me her phone, and the tension in my shoulders dissolves. Id order this drink: In the picture, it looks like blended sunshinelike summer sliding in, like a pile of crabs at the shore.

This article appears in theJuly 2022issue of Washingtonian.

Continued here:

Old Bay on Everything: How the Crab Seasoning is Taking Over - Washingtonian

Facebook reverses stance on Holocaust denial, will ban it now

Posted By on July 14, 2022

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

Andrew Caballero-Reynolds | AFP | Getty Images

Facebook announced Monday it will now ban content that "denies or distorts the Holocaust," reversing its earlier policy.

In a 2018 podcast interview, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said Facebook didn't remove Holocaust-denying content because it must allow for the possibility that users are making unintentional mistakes. "I don't think that they're intentionally getting it wrong," Zuckerberg said of users who shared that type of content.

In announcing the change, Facebook said: "Our decision is supported by the well-documented rise in anti-Semitism globally and the alarming level of ignorance about the Holocaust, especially among young people."

It cited a recent survey in which nearly 25% of American adults ages 18 to 39 said they believed the Holocaust was a myth or exaggerated or weren't sure.

"I've struggled with the tension between standing for free expression and the harm caused by minimizing or denying the horror of the Holocaust," Zuckerberg said in the Facebook blog post. "My own thinking has evolved as I've seen data showing an increase in anti-Semitic violence, as have our wider policies on hate speech. Drawing the right lines between what is and isn't acceptable speech isn't straightforward, but with the current state of the world, I believe this is the right balance."

Zuckerberg has long said Facebook should not be an arbiter of truth over the content on its platform. The company has faced criticism, including an ads boycott earlier this year, over its policies on hate speech and misinformation.

Nevertheless, Facebook has taken many measures over the years that suggest it sometimes does act as an arbiter of truth. In its blog post, it said it has taken down 22.5 million pieces of hate speech in the second quarter of 2020 and banned over 250 White supremacist organizations. Most recently, it banned all QAnon groups and ads in support of the conspiracy theory movement.

Last week, it also removed a post by President Donald Trump that falsely claimed coronavirus is less deadly than the seasonal flu.

Originally posted here:

Facebook reverses stance on Holocaust denial, will ban it now

Daily Press Briefing by the Office of the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General | UN Press – press.un.org

Posted By on July 14, 2022

The following is a near-verbatim transcript of todays noon briefing by Farhan Haq, Deputy Spokesman for the Secretary-General.

All right. Good afternoon, everyone.

**Secretary-Generals Stakeout

The Secretary-General will do a press encounter at 2p.m. today, at the Security Council stakeout position. This will concern todays developments in Istanbul.

The Secretary-General will make remarks and take a couple of questions.

**High-Level Political Forum

This morning, the Secretary-General spoke at the opening of the high-level segment of ECOSOCs (Economic and Social Council) high-level political forum.

He said that our world is in deep trouble and so too are the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, he said that we are far from powerless and that we have many concrete steps to take to turn things around. He underscored that we must end senseless, disastrous wars, unleash a renewable energy revolution, invest in people and build a new social contract. He also called for countries to deliver a New Global Deal to rebalance power and financial resources and enable all developing countries to invest in the Sustainable Development Goals.

His full remarks are online.

**Democratic Republic of the Congo

In a press briefing earlier today, the head of the Peacekeeping Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO), Bintou Keita, strongly condemned the recent attacks in North Kivu and Ituri and emphasized the need to maintain military pressure on armed groups.

The UN Mission continues to proactively deter violence alongside the national defence forces, particularly in the Kabindi bridge area and in Rumangabo, in Rutshuru territory, to counter the M23 group and to provide security to local communities.

Ms.Keita reiterated the need for M23 and all armed groups to lay down their weapons unconditionally, as well as to ensure a coherent regional and international response to sustain security and stability in eastern DRC. The surge of attacks has sparked demonstrations by people concerned for their safety in parts of North Kivu. In response, the Mission continues to engage with local stakeholders to defuse tensions and combat disinformation, which hampers the missions ability to carry out its work to protect civilians.

Meanwhile, our humanitarian colleagues in the DRC are deeply concerned by the increase in armed attacks against civilians in North Kivu and Ituri provinces, which killed at least 31 people and injured several others in less than a week.

Yesterday, armed groups attacked the town of Beni in North Kivu, and at least five civilians were killed.

This comes after the attacks we mentioned yesterday that took place in several villages in the province of Ituri, as well as the 8July attack on a health centre in a village in Beni territory.

These attacks come at a time when thousands are being displaced almost every day by continued fighting between the Congolese army and the M23 armed group in Rutshuru territory in North Kivu.

Since the beginning of the year, some 700,000 people have been displaced in the country, bringing the total number of internally displaced people to more than 6million.

And the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) calls on parties to the conflict to abide by their obligations under international humanitarian law and to protect civilians and civilian infrastructure.

**Nigeria

In Nigeria, our humanitarian partners have delivered food and nutrition assistance to 26,000 people in the past week in the town of Rann, which is in the countrys north-east.

This town is one of the most challenging environments for aid workers in the region. It has been the site of repeated attacks by non-State armed groups during which hundreds of civilians, internally displaced people, as well as aid workers have been killed. Humanitarian agencies have been forced to reduce their footprint there in recent years.

For example, a major international health partner suspended its work in Rann last month following the heightened risk of attacks targeting civilians and aid assets.

With the lean season now under way, some 4.1million people urgently need food assistance across Borno, Adamawa and Yobe states in north-east Nigeria. However, due to funding shortages, only about 1.2million people there were receiving food aid as of the end of May.

Aid agencies have reached some 1.8million people during the first quarter of 2022, despite the fact that this years Humanitarian Response Plan, which requires $1.1billion, is less than 25percent funded.

And staying with Nigeria, our UN team there, led by Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator ad interim, Matthias Schmale, is continuing to support the Governments work to respond to and recover from the pandemic. Our team contributed to the provision of health-care services to more than 125,000 members of vulnerable communities in Borno state while implementing risk communication initiatives, including on the ongoing work to tackle obstetric fistula, reaching nearly 68,000 people.

On the socioeconomic front, the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) provided more than $1million to vulnerable smallholder farmers to sustain and boost production, while UNFPA (United Nations Population Fund) ensured that support to sexual and reproductive health services continue to be provided.

For its part, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) partnered with the European Union to ensure the implementation of criminal justice responses to terrorism and violent extremism, contributing to federal prosecutors in Nigeria reviewing close to 2,900 case files that contributed to the release of 1,800 adults and 580 children from custody, as well as the referral of 230 cases for trial before the Federal High Court. For its part, the UN Information Centre trained more than 300 journalists, 37percent of whom are women, on the Sustainable Development Goals.

**Afghanistan

From Afghanistan, our humanitarian colleagues there tell us that the rate of flash flooding has increased in the past week. Since 5July, flash floods have killed 39 people including nine children across five provinces. Some 2,900 houses have been damaged or destroyed.

Humanitarian partners are mobilizing resources to respond to the needs and are focusing on emergency food assistance.

The Afghan weather agency has warned of thunderstorms and heavy rain for the next week in the south-eastern and eastern regions, which are still reeling from the impact of the 22June earthquake.

Also in Afghanistan, in Bamyan province, our humanitarian colleagues continue to help internally displaced people who fled their homes due to fighting in Balkhab in the Sar-e-Pul province in the north of the country. The UN refugee agency (UNHCR) has provided tents and other supplies to more than 4,000 people, while the World Food Programme (WFP) delivered food to nearly 2,000 people.

For its part, the UN Childrens Fund (UNICEF) has provided health care, protection and nutrition assistance to more than 500 people.

**Ukraine Refugees

On Ukraine, the UN refugee agency today released a report showing that the majority of refugees from Ukraine hope to return home as soon as possible. However, according to UNHCR, around two thirds expect to stay in their current host countries until hostilities subside and the security situation improves.

The report shows refugees consistently expressing concerns about their futures due to the ongoing war, which is preventing them from making secure, long-term plans.

The UN refugee agencys work in the region to help refugees and forcibly displaced people inside Ukraine supports and complements Governments responses, alongside the UN and NGO partners. Since February, UNHCR has assisted more than 1.5million people across Ukraine, expanding protection, housing and assistance programmes, especially to reach those living in the areas hardest hit by the war. The current focus is on preparations for the forthcoming winter.

More information online.

**Holocaust

UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) today released a report on the distortion and denial of the Holocaust on social media platforms. The report, which was done in partnership with the World Jewish Congress, reveals that this hurtful content is present on all platforms but that moderation and education make it possible to significantly reduce these phenomena.

The report focuses on five platforms: Facebook, Instagram, Telegram, TikTok and Twitter, and demonstrates that Holocaust denial and distortion is massive on Telegram, a platform known for its lack of moderation and unclear user guidelines. Nearly half of all the content in this platform denies or distorts facts. By contrast, on moderated platforms, denial and distortion are also present, but to a lesser extent. They concern 19percent of Holocaust-related content on Twitter, 17percent on TikTok, 8percent on Facebook and 3percent on Instagram.

And you can find the full report online.

**Briefings Today

When this briefing is over, Paulina Kubiak will brief you. And then immediately after that, at around 1p.m., there will be a briefing here by Professor Ahsan Iqbal, Minister for Planning, Development and Special Initiatives of Pakistan. And he will talk to you about the high-level political forum (HLPF) on sustainable development.

**Noon Briefing Guest Tomorrow

And tomorrow, my guest will be Father Francisco de Roux, the President of the Truth Commission in Colombia, who will brief on the final report of the Truth Commission.

And of course, you will hear from our Secretary-General at 2p.m. at the Security Council stakeout.

**Questions and Answers

Yes, James?

Question: We're going to hear from the SecretaryGeneral, but can you tell us the UN's readout on the talks this morning in Istanbul?

Deputy Spokesman: That would entail me getting ahead of my boss on this issue, which is something that I will not do. He will talk to you shortly, but the important point is that we believe that this is something positive, and he will talk to you at some length about why that is.

Question: If he's going to talk to us and it's something positive, obviously, that's good news. Could we request some background briefing, a briefing note or a background briefing, on exactly how this proposed deal is going to work? Because we have lots of technical questions that I don't think the SG will have time at a stakeout to answer, and it would be most useful if someone was available to answer those questions from OCHA or somewhere else.

Deputy Spokesman: I'll see on the humanitarian side whether there's any way that in the next day or so, whether we can set something up.

Question: Well, we if we're reporting on some we need someone to brief us within an hour of the SecretaryGeneral. I mean, honestly, if you want proper reporting on this, we need some background.

Deputy Spokesman: I the thing is, on that, the person that's best

Question: A fact sheet

Correspondent: Give us a fact sheet.

Deputy Spokesman: I'll see whether we can get something like a fact sheet.

Question: Where is Mr. [Martin] Griffiths?

Deputy Spokesman: I believe he's in Istanbul.

But, yes, we'll try to just score whatever material we can get.

Okay. Yes, please?

Question: My name is Nasir, and I'm from World TV. As you mentioned, there are human right violation in different parts of the world, like, especially in Africa, but you have not mentioned the recent escalation in violent attacks in occupied Kashmir.

Today, the Ambassador of Pakistan to the United Nations wrote a letter to the SecretaryGeneral on these escalations of human right violations, especially with the minority group and the Muslims. And today is the Martyrs' Day of the Kashmiris so do you have any comments on that, sir?

Deputy Spokesman: Just nothing beyond saying that our human rights colleagues have raised the issue of human rights in Kashmir. I would refer you to what the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Michelle Bachelet, has been saying, and we subscribe and support her views on this.

Is there anything else and anything in the chat? If not, I wish you all a good afternoon and see you at 2p.m.

Follow this link:

Daily Press Briefing by the Office of the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General | UN Press - press.un.org


Page 298«..1020..297298299300..310320..»

matomo tracker