Page 330«..1020..329330331332..340350..»

Another election puts Israel’s efforts to reduce cost of living on back burner – Reuters.com

Posted By on June 23, 2022

JERUSALEM, June 23 (Reuters) - Israel's economy is expected to be resilient during yet another election cycle, but households will suffer as reforms to reduce the cost of living are likely to be shelved and state spending will be scaled back until a 2023 budget is approved.

Prime Minister Naftali Bennett moved this week to dissolve parliament and call Israel's fifth election in less than four years after infighting made the ruling coalition no longer tenable. The poll is expected to take place some time between late September and early November - which means months of policy paralysis. read more

The dollar-shekel rate has barely moved so far, reflecting core economic resilience to by now familiar electoral upheaval.

Register

Fixed capital investment and private spending are on the rise and exports are expected to bounce back after a weak start to the year.

"Further political uncertainty is somewhat negative for markets, although Israel unfortunately has much experience with this scenario," said Jonathan Katz, chief economist at Leader Capital Markets. "The major downside is the lack of fiscal reforms and policy."

Foreign Minister Yair Lapid will head a caretaker government once an election date is decided next week. After a vote it typically takes weeks for a coalition to be formed.

"We now assume a more limited role of the government in the policy space with respect to inflation this year. We ... think the Bank of Israel will be emboldened to take firmer action against inflation," said JP Morgan economist Jessica Murray.

Inflation has reached an 11-year high of 4.1%, which is lower than most Western countries and the central bank has started to raise interest rates but public anger is growing about what Israelis see as steep price rises across goods and services.

The government had responded with planned reforms to boost construction starts and expand a discount scheme aimed at restraining rapidly rising property prices as demand continues to outstrip supply. It also announced plans to open up the food and agriculture sector to more imports rather than protecting local industry. However, these reforms and measures have yet to receive final parliamentary approval, and will now be on hold until at least next year. read more

Public sector wage agreements will also likely be delayed, as will an initiative to boost the minimum wage and spending on public sector infrastructure projects.

Citi economist Michel Nies said moving projects to the backburner could affect Israel's growth potential, and fiscal and monetary policies in the longer term.

A vote on the 2023 budget, which had been expected by November, has likely been pushed back until a new government is formed.

"The collapse of the ruling coalition has significantly

increased the medium-term fiscal risks in Israel," said Deutsche Bank economist Fatih Akcelik.

The economy, though, is supported by improving public finances thanks to rising tax revenue this year, which enabled the government to balance its budget in May.

"The fiscal stance is one of consolidation and this will continue through the election period and probably into next year," Murray said.

Israel's economy rebounded sharply from the COVID-19 crisis, growing 8.2% in 2021 and projections are for 5% growth this year and 4% in 2023.

"The strong improvement in Israel's balance of payments has reduced the sensitivity of Israel's economy to political developments in the region," said Goldman Sachs economist Tadas Gedminas.

Bank of Israel Governor Amir Yaron said on Tuesday that the country's institutional system makes it possible for the economy to function properly during election campaigns. read more

"The Israeli economy has proven to have an impressive ability to grow and prosper even under conditions of uncertainty political and otherwise," he said.

Register

Reporting by Steven ScheerEditing by Dan Williams and Susan Fenton

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

More here:

Another election puts Israel's efforts to reduce cost of living on back burner - Reuters.com

Israels government collapses again. So, what now? – The Hill

Posted By on June 23, 2022

For the fifth time in four years, Israelis will return to the ballot box to vote for a new government. There is little indication that the next election will have a definitive result. Israelis may have to endure repeated elections beyond 2022 simply to get a slim majority to form a coalition government and that has ramifications for the Middle East and U.S. interests.

Israel is plagued by an electoral system that gives disproportionate influence to small parties, which usually are needed to get to the minimum threshold of 61 Knesset members to form a government. Perhaps it wouldnt be so unfortunate if Israel didnt have to deal with aggression by Iran and its proxy, Hamas. As Anna Ahronheim writes in the Jerusalem Post, Israel cannot have both security and political instability. Israels enemies, be it in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, or the West Bank, are wide awake looking for an opportunity to strike.

Israels behind-the-scenes wars with Iran in Syria, Lebanon and Iraq, and with Palestinian terrorists in the West Bank, are off the radar for most Americans. In the north, Israel has been conducting the War Between the Wars to thwart Iranian entrenchment in Syria, stop the transfer of game-changing, precision-guided weapons and drones, and target Iranian-supported missile and drone factories. These operations potentially could spin out of control with a miscalculation, causing regional instability that affects American security interests.

With the resurgence of Hamas-instigated terror operations in the West Bank, Israel has been preemptively conducting its Break the Wave operation to counter terrorist activity. But Hamas may see this time of Israeli political uncertainty as an opportunity to increase its attacks.

The political chaos is unfolding as President Biden plans to visit Israel in July. A few days ago, he thought he would be meeting with Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, but now he likely will be meeting with foreign minister Yair Lapid as Bennetts replacement. There is even a possibility that Defense Minister Benny Gantz could defect from the current coalition, swallow hard and rejoin former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, with whom he had a falling out, in a new government to avoid elections. Biden has said that his mid-July trip to Saudi Arabia and Israel will be an attempt to bring more stability and peace to the Middle East.

Bennett comes from the Israeli right and Lapid from the center-left. The expectation is that Lapid may be more accepting of the Biden administrations requests regarding the Palestinian Authority, the two states for two peoples solution, limiting settlement expansion, and Americas desire to reopen a Palestinian consulate in Jerusalem. However, the Israeli electorate has leaned right since the Second Intifada, which began in September 2000, and likely would see such concessions as a betrayal. Most Israelis view the Palestinian Authority as a corrupt, unreliable partner, with a history of fomenting antisemitic ideology in textbooks, mosques and media. If Lapid makes concessions, he could be savaged by Israeli media and political opponents.

The good news is that Israels military and security apparatus is apolitical and has decades of experience coordinating its tactical operations with the United States, even when its government has interim leadership. However, on a more significant geostrategic level, it is hard to make major decisions when you are a temporary prime minister. Israels moderate allies the Gulf states, Egypt and Jordan who are developing an American-initiated defense plan with Israel in response to Irans escalation, most assuredly would feel better if Israels political system were more stable.

The messy Israeli democracy is hard for authoritarians to understand. To advance American policy interests, we need the Arab nations to deepen their relationships with Israel as some have done with the Abraham Accords as a counterweight to Iranian expansionism.

As Dan Shapiro, former U.S. ambassador to Israel, points out, U.S. officials are used to conducting relations with Israel during political crises and election campaigns. The main principle is: Dont interfere while Israels domestic political processes play out. Most normal business, particularly in security cooperation, can continue. While a minority government in Israel is fully empowered, in the case of elections, there may be some decisions a transition government in Israel cannot make.

The Biden administration reportedly is still trying to salvage an Iran nuclear deal a reworking of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) forged under President Obama and is keeping Israel abreast of the negotiations. However, Lapids political weakness may force him to take a tougher line with the U.S. Iran, as an enemy to the U.S., Israel and the West in general, seems in no hurry to rejoin the deal now, while U.S. sanctions against it are not fully enforced and the Iranian economy can stay afloat by selling oil to China though competition with Russian oil exports recently has stepped up.

Without secondary sanctions levied against China, Iran can continue to play hardball and undermine U.S. regional interests. Iran interpreted the U.S. not fully enforcing its sanctions not as a conciliatory gesture but as American weakness to be exploited. Expect Lapid or any Israeli prime minister to ask the U.S. to increase sanctions if Iran continues to develop its nuclear weapons program.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) recently sanctioned Iran because it refuses to explain uranium found in undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran has removed cameras that were monitoring its nuclear facilities. If Iran reneges on its nuclear program commitments, only snap-back sanctions, as promised in the JCPOA, could possibly pressure Iran to change its behavior. Iran knows that America has no credible military threat, making the Iranians more stubborn in negotiations.

There is broad support across the Israeli political spectrum for confronting Iran if it crosses the nuclear threshold and it will be challenging for the Biden administration if Israel moves towards a significant military response.

American interests are also affected by Israels new confrontation with Russia in Syria. Until recently, Israel coordinated its air campaign against Iranian interests in Syria with Russia to avoid any Israeli-Russian conflict. Russia was working with Israel because it was in Russias interest to suppress Iranian entrenchment in Syria, since that could threaten Syrian stability. Last week, however, Israel bombed the Damascus Airport where Iran was transiting weapons, infuriating Russia. Taken to the worst extreme, this could escalate to an Israeli attack on Russian anti-missile systems if they were to be used against Israel, setting the region on fire. And with Americas plate full with the Russia-Ukraine war, the last thing Washington needs is a kinetic conflict between its primary ally in the Middle East and the Russian bear.

The U.S.-Israel relationship will survive this political melodrama; the two democracies have navigated through similar challenges before and continued to coordinate their joint security approach to the region. But the situation is not ideal, by far especially if an interim Israeli prime minister must make a significant decision that affects American national security interests in the coming months.

Dr. Eric R. Mandel is the director of MEPIN, the Middle East Political Information Network. He regularly briefs members of Congress and their foreign policy aides. He is the senior security editor for the Jerusalem Report. Follow him on Twitter @MepinOrg.

See the original post:

Israels government collapses again. So, what now? - The Hill

Netanyahu hails fall of Israels worst government, slams Bennetts charade – The Times of Israel

Posted By on June 23, 2022

Bennett: We made a tough decision, but it was the best for the country

In comments made following the decision to dissolve the Knesset and call new elections, Prime Minister Naftali Bennett hails his government as a good government, as it saved Israel from an extended political crisis, improved the countrys security and political climate, prevented a new Iran nuclear deal, and boosted national dignity. He says that taking apart the government isnt an easy moment, but is the right move for the country.

A year ago, we formed a government that had seemed impossible, that stopped the severe leadership paralysis, he says in a televised statement. We formed a good government, and together we got Israel out of the slump. Israel went back to being governed.

Over the past weeks, we did whatever we could to save this government, not for us, but for the benefit of the country. I held many talks and understood that if the Knesset did not dissolve within 10 days, Israels security would be severely harmed, he says, referring to the fact that temporary laws applying Israeli law to settlers would have expired at the end of the month, with the opposition and rebel coalition MKs refusing to back their extension.

Unlike the opposition, which turned Israels security into a political pawn, I refused to harm Israels security for even one day, he says.

He likens the situation to the biblical judgement of King Solomon, in which each of two women claimed to be a babys mother and the king suggested cutting the baby in two in order to award each woman half a baby, and then ruling that the woman who was unwilling to tolerate harm to the child was the true mother. We chose to be the mother that saves the babys life, Bennett says.

Bennett calls Foreign Minister Yair Lapid who will become premier next week a mensch who represents a big public, despite ideological disagreements. He pledges to do everything so that the transition is successful and comprehensive.

Addressing his critics, Bennett stresses that his motives for forming the government are not a hunger for power, but a genuine will to do good for the country.

See more here:

Netanyahu hails fall of Israels worst government, slams Bennetts charade - The Times of Israel

Covert War Between Iran, Israel Emerges from the Shadows – CBN.com

Posted By on June 23, 2022

JERUSALEM, Israel For years, whats called a war between wars has existed between Israel and Iran, where much of the fighting takes place in the shadows. This shadow war is coming more and more out into the open.

Recently, Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett announced new rules of engagement with Iran called "Operation Octopus."

He said, In the past year, the State of Israel has taken action against the head of the terrorist octopus the days of immunity, in which Iran attacks Israel and spreads terrorism via its regional proxies but remains unscathed, are over.

Middle East analyst Ellie Cohanim sees the region shifting.

I think its well overdue for Israel and Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, the Bahrainis. All of these countries that have been the victims of the Iranian regime proxy activity start to hold Iran responsible rather than the proxies," she told CBN News.

Some see a ratcheting up of Israel's covert and even overt operations to thwart Iran's nuclear, and conventional missile and drone programs. It could explain the mysterious deaths of a number of Iranian nuclear scientists and military leaders recently.

Another example is Israel's recent attack on the Damascus airport, which Israel sees as a major conduit of Iranian weapons on their way to Hezbollah in Syria.

Now, Israel says Iran is threatening to retaliate by kidnapping or killing Israelis in the region and especially in Turkey.

"We are currently witnessing Iranian attempts to attack Israelis in various overseas locations. The security services of the State of Israel are working to thwart attempted attacks before they are launched. We will continue to strike those who send the terrorists and those who send those who send them. Our new rule is: whoever sends, pays," said Bennett.

Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz announced a regional cooperative Middle East air defense led by the US.

It can help with anything related to Iran's attempts to attack countries of the region using rockets, missiles, cruise missiles and UAVs. This program is already operative and has already thwarted Iranian attempts that I spoke about on other occasions, both here and in the Middle East in general," said Gantz.

With the collapse of the Israeli government, Cohanim told CBN News Israel is entering a dangerous season.

"The regime can see this all as a moment of vulnerability for the Israelis and try and take advantage. So my hope is that the Israelis as much as they are dealing with elections and cobbling together coalitions and all that they do keep their focus on what they call the existential threat that the Iranian regime poses," said Cohanim.

All this comes as efforts to revive the 2015 Iran nuclear deal seem on the brink of collapse. Senators on both sides say its unlikely Iran will agree to any new deal to limit its development of nuclear weapons.

Here is the original post:

Covert War Between Iran, Israel Emerges from the Shadows - CBN.com

Opposition calls for Tunisia to withdraw from military exercise with Israel – Middle East Monitor

Posted By on June 23, 2022

The Republican Party called on Tunisian authorities to withdraw from the "African Lion" military manoeuvres led by the United States and hosted by Tunisia, Morocco, Ghana and Senegal. Israel is expected to take part in the exercise.

The Republican Party condemned, in a statement issued on Tuesday, "the engagement of the July 25 regime in the path of normalisation in more than one field. The party held the president of the republic fully responsible for adopting a policy that deeply violates the national principles of the Tunisian people and their state."

The party considered said this engagement "will have the worst impact on our relations with our regional neighbours, and it is considered a stab in the back of the Palestinian people who are valiantly facing the Zionist war machine."

The Republican Party called for the "immediate withdrawal of Tunisia from these manoeuvres," demanding "authorities present a detailed statement to the Tunisian people about the grounds of their participation in these manoeuvres."

Since25 July 2021President Kais Saied has held nearly total power after he sacked the prime minister, suspended parliament and assumed executive authority citing a national emergency.

Heappointeda prime minister on 29 September of the same year and a government has since been formed.In December, Saiedannouncedthatareferendum will be held on 25 July to consider 'constitutional reforms' andelections would follow in December 2022.

The majority of the country's political parties slammed the move as a "coup against the constitution" and the achievements of the2011 revolution. Critics say Saied's decisions have strengthened the powers of the presidency at the expense of parliament and the government, and that he aims to transform the country's government into a presidential system.

On more than one occasion, Saied, who began a five-year presidential term in 2019, said that his exceptional decisions are not a coup, but rather measures within the framework of the constitution to protect the state from "imminent danger".

READ: Why do Arab 'normalisers' never seek their people's approval of ties with Israel?

Excerpt from:

Opposition calls for Tunisia to withdraw from military exercise with Israel - Middle East Monitor

Israel Occupation Forces fire tear gas at Gaza fishermen and farmers – Middle East Monitor

Posted By on June 23, 2022

Israeli navy forces opened fire at Palestinian fishermen and their boats off the northern coast of the besieged Gaza Strip this morning.

According to a Wafa correspondent, the fishermen were sailing in the Al-Sudaniya and Al-Waha shores, until Israeli gunboats attacked them with machine guns, forcing them to abandon their fishing trip and return home.

No casualties were reported.

According to the Palestinian Fishermen's Association in Gaza, there are some 4,000 fishermen working in Gaza's fishing sector, who are looking after about 50,000 dependents.

The profession has been deemed dangerous by rights organisations due to Israel's harassment of fishermen at sea.

READ: Denied electricity, Palestinian villages learn to live with solar power

Simultaneously, a number of Israeli tanks and bulldozers, escorted by several military vehicles, invaded the southern Gaza Strip fence and opened fire at Palestinian farmers.

Palestinian farmers were chased out of the area by Israeli soldiers shooting tear gas and live gunfire in their direction, reported Wafa news agency.

Israel's army regularly shoots at and levels agricultural land in the area around the fence, causing considerable damage to crops and preventing farmers from working their fields.

Additionally, occupation forces spray toxic materials to damage crops and force the farmers away from their lands.

Original post:

Israel Occupation Forces fire tear gas at Gaza fishermen and farmers - Middle East Monitor

Denying Holocaust Denial | National Vanguard

Posted By on June 23, 2022

by Thomas Dalton, PhD.

ON April 8, it wasannouncedthat Canada would soon be joining an illustrious club: the enlightened nations of the world that have elected to ban so-called Holocaust denial. Depending on how one interprets the law, there are currently 18 nations that either explicitly ban Holocaust denial (including Germany, Austria, France, Israel, Italy, Poland, Hungary, and Russia) or generically ban denial of genocide (Switzerland and Lichtenstein). Canada would then be the nineteenth nation in this honor roll of obsequiousness.

Canadas action comes not long after the UN General Assembly approved a related resolution, A/76/L.30, on 22 January 2022, condemning such denial. (The resolution was passed by consensus, meaning that no actual affirmative votes were cast. Evidently no country had the courage to demand a rollcall vote.)

The text of Canadas bill is apparently unavailableit seems that it will be buried in a larger spending billbut the UN resolution has some interesting remarks. It first defines the Holocaust as an event which resulted in the murder of nearly 6 million Jews, 1.5 million of whom were children. This is notable because it codifies in international law the infamous 6 million figurea number which is doomed to eventual collapse, given the dearth of evidence. Also, I know of no source for the 1.5 million children, but a lack of substantiation has never stopped our intrepid authorities in the past, and it surely wont here.

The resolution goes on to describe what it means by Holocaust denial:

Holocaust denial refers to discourse and propaganda that deny the historical reality and the extent of the extermination of the Jews by the Nazis and their accomplices during the Second World War. Holocaust denial refers specifically to any attempt to claim that the Holocaust did not take place, and may include publicly denying or calling into doubt the use of principal mechanisms of destruction (such as gas chambers, mass shooting, starvation, and torture) or the intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people.

As usual, such wording is a combination of ambiguity and meaninglessness. First, no revisionist claims that the Holocaust did not take placeif by this we are to understand that no one, no Jews, actually died. No revisionist calls into doubt that mass shootings of Jews occurred, nor that many Jews suffered from starvation and torture. They do, however, specifically challenge the idea that homicidal gas chambers were used to murder masses of people, and they do question the actual intentionality of Hitler and other leading National Socialists to literally kill the Jews.

This requires a bit of elaboration. On the first point, Zyklon-B (cyanide) chambers as instruments of mass murder face a large number of major technical problems, including (a) infeasibility of rapid, mass gassing; (b) personal danger to the alleged gassers; (c) inability to remove gas and Zyklon pellets after gassing; (d) inability to remove gas-soaked corpses; and (e) inability to dispose of masses of corpses in any reasonable time. Worse still are the so-called diesel exhaust gas chambers, which are alleged to have killed some 2 million Jewstwice the number of the infamous Zyklon chambers. (If this is news to you, you need to do some research.) These chambers allegedly relied on captured Russian diesel engines to produce fatal carbon monoxide gas. However, (a) diesels actually produce very little CO, far too little to kill masses of people in any reasonable time; (b) diesel engines cannot pump exhaust gas into sealed, air-tight rooms; and (c) the corpses at those alleged camps showed no sign of CO poisoningnamely, a pink or bright-red coloration of the skin. If the traditional advocates of the Holocaust were serious about defending their view, they would start by addressing these obvious questions. Instead, they ignore them, and retreat to legal remedies.

On the question of intentionality, the actual words of Hitler, Goebbels, and others matter. They often spoke of the Vernichtung (destruction) or Ausrottung (rooting-out) of Jews, but these terms do not require the mass-killing of the people in question. We know this because, first, the Germans used these very terms for years, decades, in public, long before anyone claims that a Holocaust had begun; clearly, they meant little more than ending Jewish dominance in society and driving most Jews out of the nation. Secondly, the Germans consistently used other language that explicitly called for deportation, evacuation, and mass removal of Jewsethnic cleansing perhaps, but not mass murder. Thirdly, we have innumerable examples of other Western leaders, from Bush to Obama to Trump, who have similarly spoken publicly of destroying or annihilating their enemies (usually Arabs or Muslims) without implying mass murder. Tough talk has always played well for politicians, and the Germans were no different.

The UN resolution continues with some specifics on the definition of denial:

[D]istortion and/or denial of the Holocaust refers, inter alia, to:

(a) Intentional efforts to excuse or minimize the impact of the Holocaust or its principal elements, including collaborators and allies of Nazi Germany,

(b) Gross minimization of the number of the victims of the Holocaust in contradiction to reliable sources,

(c) Attempts to blame the Jews for causing their own genocide,

(d) Statements that cast the Holocaust as a positive historical event,

(e) Attempts to blur the responsibility for the establishment of concentration and death camps devised and operated by Nazi Germany by putting blame on other nations or ethnic groups.

Four of these pointsexcuse or minimize impact, blame the Jews, cast the Holocaust in positive light, and attempts to blur responsibilityare all but irrelevant to serious revisionism. Serious revisionists, including Germar Rudolf, Carlo Mattogno, and Jurgen Graf, among others, virtually never discuss such things. They focus on far more pragmatic matters: the infeasibility of the mass gassing schemes, the lack of corpses or other physical evidence, the absence of photographic or documentary evidence showing mass murder, and the many logical inconsistencies of witnesses and survivors. But our fine Holocaust traditionalists never raise these troublesome issues, because they know that they have no reply.

Of the five points, only (b), gross minimization of the number of victims, is relevantin other words, the questioning of the 6 million. But what counts as gross minimization? Does 5 million count? If so, noted (and deceased) orthodox researcher Raul Hilberg would be quickly tarred with the anti-Semite label; the fact that he hasnt suggests otherwise. What about 4 million? If so, then early researcher Gerald Reitlinger is in for trouble; he long advocated around 4.2 million Jewish deaths. Does 3 million count? Or 2 million? Or will we know it when we see it? For the record, serious revisionists today estimate that around 500,000 Jews died in total at the hands of the Nazismost of these due to typhus contracted in the various camps, many in assorted shootings at the Eastern front, and virtually none in homicidal gas chambers.

So what, exactly, does the UN want from the world? As we read in the text, the UN

Of course, if we wish to designate the loss of some 500,000 Jews as a holocaust, then we are welcome to do so. But we had best get our facts and arguments straight. To resort to legal prohibitions is tantamount to admitting defeat.

None of these points were lost on a Jewish Boston Globe columnist, Jeff Jacoby. He was motivated to write a short op-ed entitled Its a mistake to ban Holocaust denial (24 April). He quotes Canadas public safety minister, Marco Mendicino: There is no place for antisemitism and Holocaust denial in Canada. Despite agreeing with this view, and despite despising Holocaust deniers, Jacoby opposes the pending law. And he explains whythough not before displaying an embarrassing ignorance and an appalling shallowness.

He first informs us that Holocaust deniers (never defined) are contemptible antisemites and brazen liars, overflowing with Jew-hatred and seeking to rehabilitate the reputation of Hitler. They attempt to refute the most comprehensively documented crime in history by insisting that it never occurred. Such people deserve all the obloquy and contempt that one can muster, he says. To call such claims unjustified and unwarranted is an understatement of the first order; the reliance here on ad hominem attacks is a sure sign of an impending vapidity of argumentation.

Still, Jacoby opposes anti-denial laws on two grounds. First, such laws run afoul of the spirit of the First Amendment (free speech and press). More broadly, he rightly notes that its dangerous to empower the state to punish ideas. Indeed, any government that can criminalize Holocaust denial this week can criminalize other opinions next week. Left unspoken, though, is a key point: How is it that in Canada, a 1% minority of Canadian Jews are able to push through a law that specifically benefits them? One would think that, in Canada, a 1% Jewish minority would have, say, half the clout of the 2% minority of American Jews. But clearly not. Canadian Jews are about to prevail yet again.

Jacobys second reason for opposing such laws is that, as I noted above, they amount to intellectual surrender. He quotes Holocaust scion Deborah Lipstadt to the effect that such laws imply that one is unable to construct a rational argument in defense of the traditional view. And this, in fact, is true. Just look at any traditionalist account of the Holocaust, even by the most learned academician. Look at any commentary on Holocaust denial. None will address the basic issues that I cited above. None will mention a single recent revisionist book, or a single active researcher, such as Rudolf, Mattogno, or Graf. None will examine or refute a single relevant revisionist argument. None will provide a breakdown, by cause, of the infamous 6 million deaths. These are telling facts.

For his part, Jacoby obviously has no answer. All he can do is make flat and baseless assertions: never was a genocide more meticulously recorded by its perpetrators or more comprehensively described by scholars and survivors; an immense ocean of evidence attests to the horror of the Holocaust. Unwisely, he attempts to use General Eisenhowers visual evidence of starvation, cruelty, and bestiality to defend his point. But this fails; as he likely is unaware, Eisenhowers 550-page postwar memoir, Crusade in Europe (1948), has not a single reference to any Holocaust, gas chambers, or Auschwitz. A single paragraph in the book (p. 439) states only that the Jews had been beaten, starved, and tortured. One finds absolutely no mention of mass murder, extermination, gassing, crematoria, or the like. Eisenhower is hardly a good witness for the defense. (For what its worth, neither Churchills nor De Gaulles postwar memoirs had any mention of Auschwitz, gas chambers, or extermination either. Ike was no anomaly.)

But does all this really matter? Whats the big deal about the Holocaust? some may say. In fact, it is hugely important. The Holocaust is the lynchpin of Jewish power. It is the raison detre of the state of Israel. It is the number one guilt-tool used against Whites everywhere. And it is the embodiment of Jewish narcissism. When that story crumbles, the whole Judeocratic edifice may well fall, too. We should never underestimate the power of Holocaust revisionism; the Jews certainly dont.

A final thought: Im happy to hear that Jeff Jacoby believes in free speech. Its too bad that he doesnt have equally strong feelings about openness and honesty, about the many problems with the Holocaust story, and about a global Jewish Lobby that is able to pass laws, ban books, and impose a cancel culture on anyone that it doesnt like. Now, that would be an op-ed worth reading.

* * *

Source: Occidental Observer

Thomas Dalton, PhD, has authored or edited several books and articles on politics, history, and religion, with a special focus on National Socialism. His works include a new translation series ofMein Kampf, and the booksEternal Strangers(2020),The Jewish Hand in the World Wars(2019), andDebating the Holocaust(4th ed, 2020). He has edited a new edition of Rosenbergs classicMyth of the 20thCenturyand a new book of political cartoons,Pan-Judah!. All these works are available atwww.clemensandblair.com. For all his writings, see his personal Web sitewww.thomasdaltonphd.com.

You can support National Vanguard by buying Dr. Daltons works through Cosmotheist Books.

Read more:

Denying Holocaust Denial | National Vanguard

Israel Elected to Lead International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance in 2025 – Algemeiner

Posted By on June 23, 2022

Israel will serve as President of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) for 2025, a year marking 80 years since the liberation of the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp and the end of the Second World War.

The State of Israel, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Yad Vashem are committed to preserving the memory of the Holocaust and to the fight against antisemitism, Israeli Foreign Minister Yair Lapid said on Thursday. As the son of a Holocaust survivor, I see it as a personal privilege and duty to continue the preservation of the memory of the Holocaust and the constant fight against antisemitism wherever it rears its head.

Israel was unanimously elected to the bodys presidency at IHRAs annual plenary session in Stockholm, Sweden.

The country elected as President hosts the IHRA plenary meetings up to twice a year. The plenary is the official decision-making body of the IHRA, made up of member country delegation heads, and is responsible for adopting recommendations and decisions made by IHRA experts.

Yad Vashem Chairman Dani Dayan, who presented Israels candidacy at the Stockholm plenum, remarked that the activities of the IHRA are of growing importance and significance during this period in which we are witnessing the alarming phenomena of Holocaust distortion and antisemitism in various parts of the world.

The acceptance of our candidacy to lead the IHRA strengthens our ability to act in this realm more vigorously, Dayan said.

On Wednesday, Israel announced the adoption of the IHRAs working definition of antisemitism, which Speaker of the Knesset Mickey Levy called a historic decision.

According to theIHRA definition, which has been adopted by 35 countries, antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.

Its guidelines add that manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity, while noting that criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic.

The Knesset as the house of representatives of the Jewish people is committed to fighting antisemitism in all its ugly forms, Levy said on Wednesday. This includes Holocaust denial and distortion, denial of the Jewish peoples right to self-determination as well as antisemitic expressions hidden under the guise of criticism of Israel.

He called on more parliaments around the world to follow suit and adopt the IHRA definition to prevent this ugly phenomenon from spreading.

Go here to see the original:

Israel Elected to Lead International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance in 2025 - Algemeiner

For Israel’s language czar, reviving Hebrew means bringing it down from the tower – The Times of Israel

Posted By on June 23, 2022

How do you say spyware in Hebrew? Until recently, Hebrew speakers who wanted to talk about the Israeli company NSO and its notorious Pegasus spyware had to rely on the English term, Israelifying it to fit their cadence and pronunciation and tossing it into the torrent of Hebrew vernacular.

A bombshell investigative report in the Calcalist financial daily in January 2022 changed all that. The staggering report claimed that Israels police had been using the spyware to illicitly hack into Israelis cellphones, including those of senior governmental officials.

Police have denied the affair and the report has since come under heavy scrutiny, but it still managed to thrust phone hacking tech into the spotlight. As the spyware story roiled the country, the English loanword fell out of use in favor of a Hebrew word coined 20 years earlier but rarely used: rogla.

For most languages, the idea that a word could be coined but stored away collecting dust for two decades until a need is found for it would be a preposterous inversion of the way vocabularies develop: Generally, old words find new meanings and new words percolate through society until they become popular enough for canonization.

As a revival of an ancient tongue, though, modern Hebrew is unique in being a product less of grassroots innovation than of top-down instruction first from lexicographer Eliezer Ben-Yehuda, and today from a state-sponsored gatekeeper, the Academy of the Hebrew Language. Rather than wait for teens on the internet to memify a new term into existence or for one to snake its way through the media and society, the academys linguists hand down new words from on high, coining them based on research, with input from experts and laypeople.

Sometimes the word fails to catch on in contemporary parlance; sometimes it lies dormant in a dusty corner of academia until some event pushes it into mainstream usage by Hebrew speakers, and sometimes the word catches fire right away. The person in charge of knowing which words are which is Prof. Moshe Bar-Asher, president of the Academy of the Hebrew Language.

Next year, Bar-Asher, 82, will mark 30 years as the final word on Hebrew words. During that time, he has helped keep the institute relevant and approachable, with a social media presence that has helped bring in a younger, more diverse audience. That vision is capped with plans for a new home with a museum dedicated to teaching visitors about Ben-Yehuda, widely regarded as the father of modern Hebrew, and the languages long history. But while the government has endorsed the idea, money for the project remains elusive.

Moshe Bar-Asher in his office on February 28, 2022. (Tal Schneider/Times of Israel)

While the work of developing a language can seem incredibly academic and stuffy, its impact can often be felt immediately and in profound ways, providing the country with a linguistic roadmap as it navigates an ever-shifting world.

Bar-Asher recalled a time in the mid-1980s when then-finance minister Moshe Nissim approached him for a word to describe a process ramping up across the country: the transfer of state-owned or common-held businesses or communities into private hands.

Moshe Nissim (Yonatan Sindel/FLASH90)

[Nissim] called me and said: I have an interview on the Erev Hadash TV show and Im supposed to talk about the privatization process in Israel. Do you have a word in Hebrew that can introduce our privatization plan? I told him, you should use halama and hafrata, Bar-Asher said, using the Hebrew words for nationalization and privatization, respectively. Nissim went on TV and for the first time in Israel he used the term hafrata. It caught on immediately.

As for halama, without much in the way of nationalization, the word fell by the wayside. A 2020 article in Ynet about El Al exploring the option of nationalization used the word, for example, but also included a sidebar explaining what it means.

Moshe Ben Harush was born in 1939 in Ksar es Souk in east-central Morocco, a large town now known as Errachidia. He immigrated to Israel at age 12 in 1951 with other youths, Hebraicized his name to Bar-Asher, and in 1976 received a doctorate in linguistics and biblical studies from Hebrew University.

Since 1993, he has served as president of the Academy of the Hebrew Language. That same year he was awarded the Israel Prize in the field of Hebrew language and Jewish languages, one of several prestigious honors he has received for his work researching both lexicography and Mizrahi Jewish culture. He has authored 18 books, and is a professor emeritus at Hebrew University despite his knit kippah and Mizrahi heritage making him something of an outlier in Israeli academia, which for decades was dominated by secular Jews of European extraction.

President Reuven Rivlin, right, with Moshe Bar-Asher during an event marking Hebrew Language Day on January 3, 2016. (Mark Neyman/GPO)

Sitting in his cramped office at the old building of the Academy of the Hebrew Language in Jerusalem recently, Bar-Asher evades a journalists attempts to get the academys read on a gamut of newer terms: engagement, newsletter, coronavirus, meme, Zoom, whataboutism, blockchain, streaming all without Hebrew translations.

But coining words is a lifetime of work, not something one recklessly tosses off. Well, maybe to a minister about to go on TV, but not to a journalist.

We have been waiting more than 3,000 years, he replied. Why not wait another year or two for the academys professional boards to make a decision on the matter?

Those boards, which include panels that decide on words or grammar for general usage as well as specialized groups who mull new words or rules for specific professions or fields, form the heart of the academys work. Rather than coin totally new words, the academy renews them, which helps emphasize the link between ancient forms of Hebrew and the modern version.

Poster blaming the coronavirus pandemic on a lack of modesty among Orthodox women. (National Library of Israel)

Bar-Asher quoted Yechiel Pines, an early Zionist who served on the Hebrew Language Committee over 100 years ago: The beauty of a new word is that it is not new, meaning that we often take words that exist in earlier Jewish texts and renew them.

And sometimes they decide not to renew. Like with coronavirus or corona, as most Hebrew-speakers refer to it. Bar-Asher said the academy briefly considered a Hebrew word, but realized it would probably never catch on after seeing Germans who coined 1,200 words related to the pandemic alone refuse to cotton to a German term for the virus.

We decided it would stay an international word, he said.

Counter-protesters make noise from their balcony where a banner reading No place for Corona deniers and Nazis is fixed during a silent march against measures to curb the spread of the coronavirus in Berlin on November 22, 2020. (Tobias Schwarz / AFP)

Bar-Asher knows plenty about words that dont catch on. When the academy landed on a term for jetlag, yaefet, the author Aharon Megged called to tell him how beautiful the word was, fitting the root consonants for fatigue into a linguistic pattern usually reserved for medical ailments, such as ademet, the word for rubella.

But I told him, This beautiful innovation wont be used. Because everyone who travels abroad will use the [English] word jetlag and those who dont travel outside the country dont need the word. It will be found exclusively in crossword puzzles, he recalled.

But he knows plenty about words that do stick, too. Today, the Hebrew word for integrity, yoshra, is in wide use, and many do not realize that the academy only came up with the word in 1996. Bar-Asher credits its success to a column by popular Haaretz writer Yoel Marcus shortly after, in which he used the term three times.

Knesset member Ahmad Tibi waves a copy of Haaretz in the Knesset on January 17, 2018. (Hadas Parush/Flash90)

First he wrote integrity with Hebrew characters and in parentheses he added yoshra. Then 10 lines down he wrote yoshra and in parentheses he added integrity, and after another 10 lines he repeated the word again, but this time without a parenthetical. And it caught on.

The Academy of the Hebrew Language was established in 1953 out of the existing Hebrew Language Committee, which Ben-Yehuda created in 1890 to help develop the language.

A law that year legislated the creation of the state-supported research body to direct development of the Hebrew language on the basis of research into the language over time and its branches.

Today, the academys decisions on grammar, spelling, terminology, and transcription are published in the gazette of record for the State of Israel. State institutions such as the army, government bodies, and public media are mandated to adopt the new rules, though on the street a switch from something like linguistika to balshanut can take much longer.

Despite being one of the oldest continuously running institutions in the country, it can sometimes feel like the academy has no home. The organization is run out of two adjacent buildings on the Givat Ram campus of Hebrew University, among the first built by the school when it opened the satellite location in the 1950s.

Illustrative: Students seen at the Givat Ram campus of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, October 27, 2014. (Miriam Alster/FLASh90)

Academy staff complain that the buildings are dilapidated, too small, and unsuited to their needs. When the academy hosts lectures, seminars or other events, it must rent space elsewhere because its headquarters cant host a large number of guests.

A decade ago, the government okayed the creation of a new home for the academy, to be built between the National Library and the Bible Lands Museum on Ruppin Road in Jerusalem, a corner of the city that hosts other large national edifices such as the Knesset and the Israel Museum.

Bar-Asher coined a new word in celebration of the academys new home: minveh. The word takes a term that evokes both beauty and an abode and aligns it with a linguistic pattern used for physical sites, like an encampment (mahaneh) or lookout post (mizpeh). Once the word was approved, it was decided that it should be used not only for the academy but also for other august institutions.

He envisions the academys eventual minveh not only as a cloistered academic center for research into linguistic minutiae, but as a way to reach the public. Plans for the new center call for a museum of the Hebrew language. Exhibitions will explore the over 3,000-year history of written Hebrew, and will tell the story of the revival of modern Hebrew, starting in the 1880s with the arrival of Ben-Yehuda, according to Bar-Asher.

I want the museum to the tell the story of the language century by century, he said. For all those 31 centuries the Hebrew language never died.

But after a decade, the academys minveh is as much on the shelf as the word rogla used to be. In this case, though, the missing ingredient is money (along with a surplus of municipal red tape).

The new building is slated to cost some NIS 300 million ($93 million), about NIS 100 million ($31 million) less than the new National Library, set to open later this year, or the revamped ANU Museum of the Jewish People in Tel Aviv, which reopened last year.

Construction site of the new National Library in Jerusalem on November 11, 2020. (Hadas Parush/Flash90)

The state has so far kicked in NIS 1.2 million ($360,000) and has agreed to contribute as much as NIS 9 million ($2.7 million) for the project. Donors have added another NIS 9 million, leaving the museum just some NIS 280 million shy of the goal.

To get the rest of the way to the goal, the academy is launching a fundraising campaign in Israel and abroad. Despite the high hurdles, Bar-Asher is confident that the funding can be found, citing a recent agreement with the head of the Jewish National Fund to contribute what he calls a good amount. The exact figure cant be published yet, but he said it comes to less than a tenth of what the academy needs.

Nonetheless, Bar-Asher hopes Diaspora Jews will be willing to open their wallets once they understand the importance of establishing a museum and a national research institute for the Hebrew language. Its an area where he has had success before.

I remember back in the 80s when I was sent to raise funds in the United States for Hebrew University. Out of 100 people we met, two agreed to donate and it was a sensation. I flew back to Israel with a check in my hand written out for $20 million.

The museum is part and parcel of Bar-Ashers larger campaign to make public involvement a cornerstone of the academy. That drive also includes seeking input from laypeople when formulating new words.

Seventeen years ago I decided that we needed to hear from the wider public on every general word renewed by the academy, as in words that dont fall under professional jargon. Israel has people who are sixth-generation Hebrew speakers, he said. We renew around 200 words a year.

The public input has helped the academy remain relevant, keeping it on top of shifting attitudes and changing standards. Bar-Asher noted that at a recent meeting of the academys committee on words affecting the LGBT community, some 10 members of the community attended and pushed several changes, including discarding the term ach-choregfor step-sibling.

They say it has a negative connotation, Bar-Asher recalled. The word choreg can mean to deviate or diverge. Instead, they replaced it with shaluv, or integrated.

You can say ach-shaluv or just shaluv, he said. People have yet to get used to the word, but its already appeared in some research articles and editorials.

The academy has also found surprising success engaging with the public online, largely thanks to its slickly and wittily packaged announcements of new words, grammatical rulings and other linguistic bric-a-brac, usually designed with virality in mind and often timed with news events for extra topicality.

The academys Facebook page boasts nearly 350,000 followers, an impressive number considering the stuffy academic subject matter and relative paucity of Hebrew speakers, who total just an estimated 9 million worldwide. For comparisons sake, the Modern Language Association and the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, standard-bearers for American English, have 150,000 and 450,000 followers respectively on Facebook.

A girl browses Captain Underpants in Hebrew during the annual Hebrew Book Week festival, at Sarona, Tel Aviv on June 15, 2022. (Avshalom Sassoni/Flash90)

The academy also has substantial followings on Twitter and Instagram, though not as large, underscoring the challenges it faces in reaching younger people.

According to Naftali Carmon, who runs the academys social media pages, some 70% of followers on Instagram are under age 34.

We also recently opened a TikTok account, with an academy associate uploading short videos with new words and light content, he told The Times of Israel.

Naftali Carmon on the Hebrew University campus, February 28, 2022. (Tal Schneider/Times of Israel)

The academy initially geared its social media presence toward educators and linguistic experts, according to Carmon, but about five years ago its leadership made a decision to reach out to a younger, more diverse audience, and social media has led the way.

One recent post featured advice on the correct usage of an idiom for burning the midnight oil, which translates as working nights as days, along with a possible explanation of why many Israelis say they work days as nights even though its not in order and not logical. The explanation sits above an illustration of a worker napping at his desk. (Spoiler alert: Its because they are used to saying day and night and not vice versa.)

? : " " " "

Posted by onWednesday, June 8, 2022

Another shared a picture of the single Three Girls from singer Noa Kirel pointing out that she used the masculine form of three.

We saw. No need to keep tagging us, the academy wrote with faux annoyance.

, ???? , ! ????

Posted by onMonday, June 6, 2022

The academys website has a more earnest outlook, but when we engage on social media, we choose larger fonts, lighter headlines, as we are looking to simplify the linguistic content, Carmon said.

Among the most popular or controversial posts are ones dealing with changes in spelling standardizations, such as simplifications to remove letters once used to denote missing vowels.

It causes havoc on our Facebook page, Carmon said. People cry that it cant be, because it is different from how their mom taught them to spell.

Some posts garner thousands of comments Israelis take huge pride in their language, Carmon quipped and the academy also fields questions from students, teachers and others about new words or correct usage.

But even if some posts dont get people worked up, Carmon says tying announcements to current events often does the trick and then some.

, , ; , .

Posted by onFriday, June 17, 2022

Once a week we put together a linguistic explanation of some trend, or something in the public eye and topical. We try to mix in less-familiar words, punctuation, dialects, he said.

On June 9, the academy posted online about usage and pronunciation of words related to LGBTQ issues, connecting its work to Pride Month. It also posted an announcement of new words approved by the academy in the field of political science, many of which have their own links to current events.

Among the ideas that are now included in the 3,000-year story of Hebrew: political alignment and de-alignment, ethnicity, nepotism, realpolitik, capitalism, totalitarianism, patriotism, consensus, demagoguery and, at long last, filibuster.

Here is the original post:

For Israel's language czar, reviving Hebrew means bringing it down from the tower - The Times of Israel

Middlebury Language Schools to Operate in Person – Middlebury College News and Events

Posted By on June 23, 2022

MIDDLEBURY, Vt. June 24 marks the first student arrival day for the Middlebury Language Schools, known internationally for their full immersion approach to language teaching. This summer the Language Schools will welcome over 1,500 students and 300 faculty and staff to the campuses of Middlebury College, Bennington College, and the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey to study Abenaki, Arabic, Chinese, English, French, German, Hebrew, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Russian, and Spanish. The English Language School will launch an eight-week program in Monterey, and the School of Korean will start a masters inKorean.

All Language Schools will be back in person after a fully remote summer in 2020 and partially remote summer in 2021. In addition to their in-person programs, the Kathryn Wasserman Davis School of Russian and the School of Hebrew will operate a few programs online, including a Russian four-week advanced course and a Hebrew six-week online program. Select graduate students in the masters in Spanish and masters in French will also return to Argentina and France, after two summers of not having the option to go abroad. In-person students are required to be vaccinated with a primary series andbooster.

We are grateful to be able to have all schools in person again, remarked Steve Snyder, dean of Language Schools. This will be a special summer working with colleagues at Bennington andMonterey.

Language Schools students will live, learn, and interact in the language they have come to study and sign the Language Pledge, a formal commitment designed by Middlebury to speak the language of study for the entire summer session. The Language Schools will also host virtual events that are open to alumni and thepublic.

Since 1915, more than 50,000 students from all walks of lifeincluding more than 12,000 advanced degree holdershave attended one or more of the LanguageSchools.

Students will bring a wide range of experiences with them this summer. A student in the Arabic School is a documentary filmmaker and journalist working on a CNN documentary series in the Middle East, while a student enrolled in the School of Korean has been working in public health and leading teams to set up COVID-19 vaccination clinics. In both the School of Abenaki and Betty Ashbury Jones MA 86 School of French, a mother and her daughter are enrolled. A student in the German School is an author working on several projects chronicling the lives of refugees in Germany, and a student in the Kathryn Wasserman Davis School of Russian is researching indigenous communities of the RussianFederation.

Virtual events open to the public can be found on the event list, which will continue to be updated throughout the summer. More information about the Middlebury Language Schools can be found online or by contacting the Language Schools at802-443-5510.

See original here:

Middlebury Language Schools to Operate in Person - Middlebury College News and Events


Page 330«..1020..329330331332..340350..»

matomo tracker