Page 420«..1020..419420421422..430440..»

Jewish Ideas That Transformed the World – aish.com – Aish

Posted By on April 13, 2022

Without the Jews the world would have been a radically different place.

What values are essential for the proper functioning of society?

If you were to ask the average person on the street, good chance theyd mention these five:

These values are so essential and obvious to us today that we might assume that theyve always been part of society throughout human history. Yet these values were far from obvious in the ancient world, even amongst the most highly developed, sophisticated civilizations of antiquity.

Lets travel back a few thousand years to the ancient world to get a glimpse at the shocking contrast between then and now.

The right to life is the most basic of all values, yet in the ancient world it was astonishingly absent. Human sacrifice was common-place, as were blood sports like gladiators. Infanticide, the killing of newborn children, was universally practiced as means of both population control and sex selection.

Here is an excerpt from a letter from Roman citizen named Hilarion, writing to his pregnant wife 2,000 years ago:

Know that I am still in Alexandria...I ask and beg of you to take good care of our baby son, and as soon as I receive payment, I will send it up to you. If you deliver a child [before I get home], if it is a boy, keep it, if a girl discard it...1

When we look at how the world reacts with outrage at the Russian invasion of the Ukraine, we see how unacceptable war has become in modern consciousness. This was hardly the case until relatively recently in history.

The ancient world was a place of constant battles and conquest, a world where heroes were the warriors who killed the most and greatest opponents and the only countries that werent conquered where those that were strong enough to fight off the conquerors.

Equality before the law is a fundamental principle of modern liberal democracy, yet for the vast majority of history, this principle was far from fundamental. In most of the world, especially in the highly-developed civilizations, a small group of privileged elites maintained a tight hold on wealth and power. The average person was poor and powerless, and even the greatest minds of antiquity saw no reason to change this.

The great Roman statesman, Cicero wrote:

What is called equality is really inequitable. For when equal honor is given to the highest and lowest-for men of both types must exist in every nation-this very fairness is most unfair; but this cannot happen in states ruled by their best citizens.2

Today free education and universal literacy are a given, but it was a very different story in the ancient world. Poverty and the struggle for survival forced the majority of children to work from a young age, while deliberate government policy and the desire to control the population led to mass illiteracy for most of human history. While the rates of literacy have varied from place to place and time to time, historians estimate that, on average, until around 500 years ago, only about one in a thousand people could read!

Every developed country in the world has social welfare infrastructure to help those in need and there are countless international organization that fight poverty, disease, help countries in need and deal with natural disasters. Almost all of these programs and institutions came into being in the last 200 years, before that time there was virtually nothing.

The philosopher Plutarch clearly expresses the contempt that those who had in the ancient world had for those who had nothing:

But if I gave you, you would proceed to beg all the more. It was the man who gave to you in the first place who made you idle and so responsible for your disgraceful state.3

Even this cursory look at the ancient world shows that compared to our standards today, it was a pretty brutal and callous world. Our list of essentials values was basically absent.

So where do these values come from?

The British historian, Paul Johnson, gives us the answer:

Certainly, the world without the Jews would have been a radically different place.... To them we owe the idea of equality before the law, both divine and human, of the sanctity of life and the dignity of the human person, of the individual conscience and so of personal redemption; of the collective conscience and so of social responsibility; of peace as an abstract ideal and love as the foundation of justice and many other items which constitute the basic moral furniture of the human mind. Without the Jews, it might have been a much emptier place.4

To understand why the tiny Jewish people had such a transformative impact on the values of the world, we need to examine one more fundamental concept that is the source from which these six values stem. That core idea is Ethical Monotheism, that there is one God Who is the source of morality.

In the very beginning of the Book of Genesis describes humans as being made in the image of God with a unique soul, neshama in Hebrew. The moral implications of every person possessing this unique, God-given spark are tremendous:

John Adams, one of the Founding Fathers of America and the second president, summed it up beautifully when he wrote:

I will insist that the Hebrews have done more to civilize men than any other nation. If I were an atheist and believed in blind eternal fate, I should still believe that fate had ordained the Jews to be the most essential instrument for civilizing the nations. If I were an atheist of another sect I should still believe that chance had ordered the Jews to preserve and propagate for all mankind the doctrine of a supreme, intelligent, wise almighty sovereign of the universe, which I believe to be the great essential principle of all morality, and consequently of all civilization They have given religion to three quarters of the globe and have influenced the affairs of mankind more, and more happily than any other nation, ancient or modern.7

The explanation as to how a tiny, exiled, persecuted and powerless people was able to shape the collective conscience of humanity is the topic for another discussion, but there is no question that Ethical Monotheism, first brought to the world by Abraham 3,700 years ago, has transformed the world. While these values have not always been part of humanitys collective conscience, Judaism has changed the world so powerfully that it seems as if they always were. As Thomas Cahill so beautifully wrote:

The Jews were the first people to break out of this circle, to find a new way of thinking and experiencing, a new way of understanding and feeling the world, so much so that it may be said with some justice that theirs is the only new idea that human beings have ever had. But their worldview has become such a part of us that at this point it might as well have been written into our cells as a genetic code.8

Click here to order a copy of Ken Spiros book WorldPerfect-The Jewish Impact on Civilization

The rest is here:

Jewish Ideas That Transformed the World - aish.com - Aish

Doubling down, Odeh also calls on Jewish Israelis to refuse to serve in West Bank – The Times of Israel

Posted By on April 13, 2022

Joint List party leader Aymen Odeh on Monday doubled down on his call to Arab Israelis not to serve in the security forces operating in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, now also calling on Jewish Israelis to refuse to do so.

Odeh caused outrage on Sunday when he said Arab Israelis serving in the security forces in the West Bank and East Jerusalem were humiliating their own people and called on them to throw down their weapons and quit.

Odeh, in a Ramadan video posted from the Damascus Gate in Jerusalems Old City, also said his ultimate goal was to see the Palestinian flag flying over Jerusalem.

Odehs remarks specifically referred to Arabs serving in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, which have seen high tensions in recent weeks, not those serving as police inside the pre-1967 borders.

The lawmakers comments nonetheless sparked calls to investigate him for inciting violence as Israel is facing the deadliest wave of terror attacks in years.

Get The Times of Israel's Daily Editionby email and never miss our top stories

Speaking to Channel 12 on Monday, Odeh refused to apologize and extended his call to Jewish Israelis.

Dont serve in the occupation forces, dont kill, he said.

Odeh also denied that he called on Arab Israelis to quit the police. I never mentioned the word police at all, he said.

A significant portion of security forces in East Jerusalem are police.

I actually see Israelis with us in the fight against the occupation and for peace, he said. We need peace and there is no way to do so without ending the occupation and establishing a Palestinian state alongside Israel.

Joint List party leader Ayman Odeh speaks in a video in which he calls on Arab Israeli officers to quit the security forces, saying they humiliate their people on April 10, 2022 (Screencapture/Facebook)

Odehs comments were backed by fellow Joint List MK Sami Abou Shehadeh, who told Channel 12 that everyone who is part of the occupation army needs to be embarrassed. It is an embarrassment. Israel is running an apartheid regime and carrying out crimes against humanity.

Joint List MK Sami Abou Shehadeh (Screen capture: YouTube)

I want to take this opportunity to support what Odeh said. This is our historic position, nothing is new here, Abou Shehadeh said.

In his video message Sunday, Odeh said: Recently, I have met with many groups from occupied Arab Jerusalem. Young Palestinians with Israeli citizenship have told me that they are being harmed and humiliated. It is important for me to tell you from here, the Damascus Gate, that it is a humiliation for one of our sons to join the security forces, Odeh said in a video posted to his Facebook page.

Israeli security forces in the East Jerusalem neighborhood of Sheikh Jarrah on February 13, 2022. (AHMAD GHARABLI / AFP)

Damascus Gate has been the scene of near-daily clashes between Palestinians and the Israel Police since the start of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.

Odeh said Arab Israelis who join the Israeli security forces were humiliating our people, humiliating our families and humiliating everyone who comes to pray in the Al-Aqsa Mosque.

A spokesperson for Odeh later emphasized that the lawmakers remarks referred exclusively to those serving in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, as opposed to police inside the Green Line, the 1948 ceasefire line between Israel and neighboring Arab states.

This is our usual position against the Arabs joining the occupation forces beyond the Green Line, she said.

Odehs comments drew outrage from many and Hebrew media reported that the police had asked the attorney general for an opinion on whether his remarks warranted opening an investigation into incitement to violence.

Several MKs in the opposition Likud party also called for Odeh to be investigated, while Interior Minister Ayelet Shaked on Monday rejected any possibility that the wobbling coalition could partner with Odehs party.

Ayman Odeh incites against the State of Israel and its institutions. We wont make agreements with him. His place is outside Israels Knesset, Shaked tweeted.

Interior Minister Ayelet Shaked speaks at a conference in Jerusalem on March 7, 2022. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

Odeh was also attacked by left-wing coalition politicians, with Deputy Economy Minister Yair Golan of the Meretz party saying Odehs comments mainly hurt the public he is trying to represent.

Golan said that Odeh hasnt learned anything from [Raams Mansour] Abbas. The first thing you need to do is embrace the partnership and become a partner in the coalition, to create an opposite momentum to the continued neglect [of the Arab community] led by right-wing governments, to strengthen the integration of Arab Israeli citizens within Israeli society.

He continued: Apparently, Odeh is determined not to support this government, not from outside or from inside. He rejects it completely, which is a form of political blindness and blindness toward the public.

We're telling a critical story

Israel is now a far more prominent player on the world stage than its size suggests. As The Times of Israel's Diplomatic Correspondent, I'm well aware that Israel's security, strategy and national interests are always scrutinized and have serious implications.

It takes balance, determination, and knowledge to accurately convey Israel's story, and I come to work every day aiming to do so fully.

Financial support from readers like you allows me to travel to witness both war (I just returned from reporting in Ukraine) and the signing of historic agreements. And it enables The Times of Israel to remain the place readers across the globe turn to for accurate news about Israel's relationship with the world.

If it's important to you that independent, fact-based coverage of Israel's role in the world exists and thrives, I urge you to support our work. Will you join The Times of Israel Community today?

Thank you,

Lazar Berman, Diplomatic Correspondent

You're a dedicated reader

Were really pleased that youve read X Times of Israel articles in the past month.

Thats why we started the Times of Israel ten years ago - to provide discerning readers like you with must-read coverage of Israel and the Jewish world.

So now we have a request. Unlike other news outlets, we havent put up a paywall. But as the journalism we do is costly, we invite readers for whom The Times of Israel has become important to help support our work by joining The Times of Israel Community.

For as little as $6 a month you can help support our quality journalism while enjoying The Times of Israel AD-FREE, as well as accessing exclusive content available only to Times of Israel Community members.

Thank you, David Horovitz, Founding Editor of The Times of Israel

Continue reading here:

Doubling down, Odeh also calls on Jewish Israelis to refuse to serve in West Bank - The Times of Israel

Why did Jesus dip a piece of food and give it to Judas? – Aleteia

Posted By on April 13, 2022

The Last Supper celebrated by Jesus and his disciples is linked to the Jewish Passover celebration, which contains a variety of symbolic acts.

During this meal, Jesus proclaims that one of his disciples will betray him.

When Jesus had thus spoken, he was troubled in spirit, and testified, Truly, truly, I say to you, one of you will betray me.

Jesus answered, It is he to whom I shall give this morsel when I have dipped it. So when he had dipped the morsel, he gave it to Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot.Then after the morsel, Satan entered into him. Jesus said to him, What you are going to do, do quickly.

Why did Jesus dip a morsel and give it to Judas?

There are many different interpretations of this act, but one possibility is that Jesus was performing a part of the Jewish Passover that recalls the betrayal of Joseph in the Old Testament.

This is what D.T. Lancaster suggests in his article, Last Seder: A Jewish Reading of the Last Supper.

After the first cup, participants in the Passover Seder wash hands and then take part in a ritual called karpas. The ritual involves dipping a green vegetable twice into red wine vinegar. (In modern seders, salt water often substitutes for the wine vinegar.) The meaning of the ritual is obscure, but according to some opinions, it represents the betrayal of Joseph whose brothers dipped his coat in goats bloodthe event that initiated the descent into Egypt. It may also represent dipping the hyssop into the lambs blood.

Shlomo Riskin also explains this ritual for an article on Israel Times.

Interestingly enough, there is a custom in many Yemenite communities to dip the karpas vegetable into the charoset, a mixture of wine, nuts and sometimes dates, which the Jerusalem Talmud says is reminiscent of blood. Hence, just as the brothers dipped Josephs cloak of many colors into the blood of the goat claiming to their father that Joseph had been torn apart by a wild beast; we dip our karpas into the charoset.

Everything in the Gospel is there for a reason, even a small minute detail of Jesus dipping a piece of food and giving it to Judas.

Read the rest here:

Why did Jesus dip a piece of food and give it to Judas? - Aleteia

Missouri moves closer to legalized sports betting. Are Jews allowed to gamble? – St. Louis Jewish Light

Posted By on April 13, 2022

Jordan Palmer and MJL. , Chief Digital Content OfficerApril 11, 2022

The state of Missouri is one step closer to legalizing sports betting. Late last month, the Missouri House overwhelming approved sports gaming legislation, passing HB 2502&2556with a vote of 115 to 33. The legislation must still be approved by the Senate before sports gaming could be legal in Missouri.

The billlegalizes retail sports bettingat the states13riverboat casinos and creates39online skins for mobile wagering. Missouris six casino operators receive33 of the skins, with the remaining skins awarded to the states six professional sports teams.

In Illinois, sports betting is live and legal. As of March 5, 2022, you can complete the entire signup process for an Illinois sportsbook account from anywhere in the state.

This leads to the question, are Jews allowed to gamble?

While there is no explicit Jewish prohibition on gambling, the rabbis of the Talmud did not have a positive view of the practice. The clearest statement on the matter is in the Mishnah in Sanhedrin, which rules that someone who plays with dice is barred from serving as a witness. There is a dispute, however, about the particulars of this prohibition.

According to one opinion in the Mishnah, the prohibition applies only in the case where the gambler has no other occupation i.e. a professional gambler. Based on this view, the Talmud suggests that the reason such a person is barred from testifying is because they contribute nothing useful to the world. Another opinion suggests that gambling is a form of thievery, since the losing party to a bet gives up their money against their will. This rationale would suggest that even an occasional gambler cannot serve as a witness. However, this opinion is not universally accepted, since presumably both parties to a bet engage in the wager willingly and therefore accept upon themselves the possibility of loss.

Connect with your community every morning.

The halachic permissibility of gambling rests on which of these is the reason for invalidating a gambler as a witness. If its merely because gambling is a frivolous pursuit, then the occasional bet may be permitted. If gambling is thievery, then its prohibited at all times, which is the view of some rabbinic authorities. In either case, compulsive or professional gambling would be forbidden.

There is some question of whether the latter approach would apply to all forms of gaming, or merely to bets or wagers, in which one party wins and the other loses. Some forms of casino gambling, in which one plays against the house rather than other players, may not run afoul of the concern regarding theft. Its also questionable whether lotteries run into this problem. Some authorities, like the late Sephardic Chief Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, have ruled thatbuying lottery tickets is form of stealing, since the person who purchases a ticket may have assumed he would win and therefore surrenders his money unwillingly. The late Israeli Rabbi Ovadia Hedaya hasruled that lotteries are permitted, since one is not taking money directly from another person but rather from a pool of money. Lotteries, raffles and the like, when undertaken for charitable purposes, are not considered forbidden and there are many examples, both historic and current, of Jewish communities running lotteries for fundraising purposes.

None of these considerations address the moral perils of gambling, which has commanded the attention of Jewish authorities throughout history and even in the present day. Excommunication, flagellation, fines and the denial of synagogue honors were common penalties for those who transgressed gambling regulations. Compulsive gamblers were described as sinners, charged with harming family life and forgetting God. The habithas been described as abominable, ugly, frivolous and morally impure.According to the Tul HaAroch, a commentary on the Torah by the medieval authority Rabbi Jacob ben Asher, Moses warned the Jewish people before his death not to become corrupted by gambling.

Indeed, some understand the sheer volume of these efforts to suppress gambling, and the large number of exceptions to those rulings, as evidence of its popularity among Jews. Historically, the prohibition on gambling was relaxed on minor Jewish holidays like Hanukkah, Purim and the monthly sanctification of the new moon (Rosh Chodesh). Authorities in Bologna in the 15th centuryspecifically permittedplaying cards on fast days in order to forget the pain, provided one wagers no more than one quattrino at a game per person. Similar exceptions were made in medieval Europe on the occasions of weddings and births andon Christmas Eve, known in some Orthodox communities as Nittel-Nacht.

In contemporary times, concerns about the corrosive effects of gambling, particularly gambling as an addiction, have persisted. In the 1980s, the Federation of Jewish Philanthropies (today UJA-Federation of New York) ran a task force on compulsive gambling to addresswhat one official calleda problem of some magnitude in the Jewish community.Shmuly Yanklowitz, an Orthodox rabbi and social justice activist, has penned several articles in recent years that invoked longstanding Jewish concerns about thedangers of gambling, noting also studies that link gambling addiction to bankruptcy, domestic abuse, criminality and even suicide risk.

View post:

Missouri moves closer to legalized sports betting. Are Jews allowed to gamble? - St. Louis Jewish Light

Should we forgive slave owner Tobias Rustat? | Derek Taylor | The Blogs – The Times of Israel

Posted By on April 13, 2022

As a rough guide a Church of England consistory court is akin to our Beth Din and they recently handed down a judgment which would have interested any Dayan. Jesus College, Cambridge had a 17th century benefactor called Tobias Rustat (1608-1694) and he gave the College 2,000 (450,000 today) to provide scholarships for the sons of Church of England orphaned children.

Now the college have just appointed their first black women master, Benita Alleyne, a first class choice, and she wants the memorial to Tobias Rustat in the College chapel to be moved somewhere less conspicuous. It appears that Mr. Rustat made a fair amount of money out of the slave trade.

Now nobody as far as I am aware has asked for the Beth Dins input but, frankly, we were involved with slavery about 1,300 years before the Christian church appeared. We have well over 600 laws and one of them is to be a light unto the nations so a little historical background may be appropriate.

As you know on Yom Kippur the Almighty decides the fate of every human being in the next year. In the key prayer it is laid down that there are just three ways of avoiding a bad outcome; penitence, prayer and charity. Jesus College is involved in all three.

As he lived to be 86, Tobias Rustats seems highly likely to have been given the Almightys mercy, because very few people in mediaeval times lived to be 86. The equivalent of 450,000 is surely acceptable as a substantial amount of charity. The college today quite correctly wants to show its penitence for the abhorrent practice of slavery. and as far as prayer is concerned, for centuries it has been offered every day in their Chapels beautiful surroundings.

It is true that there were slaves in Bible days, and this year we will celebrate our own freedom from Egyptian slavery for over the 3,000th time. Would you believe we rose against Rome 1,000 years before the Battle of Hastings! When the Egyptian Pharaoh refused to release the Jews, the Almighty cursed them with 10 plagues. In the Wilderness the Jews were instructed to celebrate their freedom the year after they escaped. That is the message of Passover, and, of course, the Last Supper was Seder night.

There were Hebrew slaves and Canaanite slaves in Biblical times, but the laws on their treatment were immeasurably more civilised than anything before William Wilberforce got a bill abolishing the dread practice in 1833. He died just before it received the royal assent.

The Jews had abolished slavery in the time of Jeremiah around 600bce, though not everybody obeyed the law. If a Canaanite slave converted to Judaism, he was freed. After 6 years a slave had to be offered his freedom and there were punishments for slave owners who mistreated their slaves. In the 49th year, the Jubilee year, all the slaves had to be freed.

Ending slavery was an expensive business. When it was abolished in 1833 the slave owners had to be compensated. The government borrowed 20 million (1,940,000,000 today) the largest sum ever raised, to pay them off. Nathan Mayer Rothschild produced it for them.

You cant rewrite history. De was a slave owner, but he was also a very charitable man. The Archbishop of Canterbury cant see that moving the memorial is any great deal, but the Chief Rabbi might remind him that theres another religious element which has to be considered; the question of forgiveness.

How does our 6th century Talmud deal with forgiveness? The Almighty showed the way by forgiving any number of Biblical characters for their shortcomings. Forgiveness is a fundamental in Judaism and certainly we have had plenty of oppressors to forgive over the centuries.

Now the Beth Din know more about the Talmud than I do, but I suspect that theyd back up the consistory court.

Derek is an author & former editor of the Jewish Year Book

View original post here:

Should we forgive slave owner Tobias Rustat? | Derek Taylor | The Blogs - The Times of Israel

The Pundit: Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Nomination and the Jewish Approach to Textual Interpretation – The Commentator – The Commentator

Posted By on April 13, 2022

The recent political news cycle has been dominated by the Feb. 25 nomination of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson for associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. This nomination has captivated the attention of Americans spanning the entire political spectrum, with many celebrating the historic nomination of the first Black women to the Supreme Court, and others lamenting the nominees selection based on the premise of race and gender rather than merit.

There are those saying that this runs directly against Martin Luther King Jrs famous I Have a Dream speech, where he wished for a future where people will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. Others counter the opposition to this nomination by quoting a 1980 Ronald Reagan campaign speech where he promised to nominate the first female justice to the Supreme Court, asserting "It is time for a woman to sit among our highest jurists." Reagan later fulfilled this promise by appointing Sandara Day O'Connor to serve as the first female Supreme Court justice.

While I have my own strong opinions regarding this nomination, the news cycle has produced enough articles representing both sides. However, I believe that there is a far greater issue facing the Supreme Court, with ramifications that have the potential to change America as we know it, and it is not getting the proper press attention it deserves.

The nomination of an ideologically liberal judge highlights the inherent difference between judicial activism and judicial restraint. While the former fundamentally threatens the integrity of the Constitution, it also seemingly contradicts one of the core principles of our Jewish observance.

Judicial activism can be defined as a judicial philosophy holding that the courts can and should go beyond the applicable law to consider broader societal implications of their decisions. This is typically depicted as the embodiment of the living document theory, and a style of interpretation that believes that the Constitution is dynamic and is intended to adapt with the times, even without being formally amended.

Judicial restraint is fundamentally the opposite, and encourages judges to limit the exercise of their own power. Advocates of judicial restraint argue that judges do not have the authority to act as policy makers. This approach seeks to respect the liberal democratic values upon which the United States was founded, and the liberties which the Constitution protects, when making legal decisions. This practically relates to originalism, the ideology of textual interpretation that believes that the Constitution must be interpreted with the meaning in mind the day it was written.

Ideological and philosophical originalism has been present since the first bench of Supreme Court justices, yet is rarely discussed without reference to former Justice Antonin Scalia. When deliberating cases, Scalia was meticulous in reading the text of the Constitution, and was precise in his opinions, always taking into account the exact wording and meaning of the text. Despite his personal opinions and the growing challenges modernity brought on, he stayed firm in his view that following the letter of the law was the proper approach to take in interpretation and would rule against his own political opinion if the text was different from his personal belief.

Scalia was not the first to formally utilize the principles of originalism, as the letter-of-the-law interpretive approach dates back centuries. It is the common practice of Orthodox Judaism to rigorously examine Jewish laws and traditions and follow them the same way as our ancestors were instructed to at Har Sinai when receiving the Torah. When conflicts arise in contemporary society, especially regarding the challenges of modernity, we still look to halacha and tradition to see how to proceed, and maintain a strong adherence to Jewish law. Modern problems do not always require modern solutions, and in the case of Judaism, we are directed back to the source to unpack questions that arise in changing times.

The first Mishnah in Pirkei Avot states that Moses received the Torah at Sinai and transmitted it to Joshua, Joshua to the elders, and the elders to the prophets, and the prophets to the Men of the Great Assembly. Not only were the words passed down, but the interpretations and hidden meanings were as well. The Torah applies from one generation to the next, and its implications, laws and teachings are meant to be passed down and instilled, rather than adapted to fit with modernity. In Rambams introduction to seder Zeraim, he states, Know that prophecy does not help in the explanation of the Torah and in the extrapolation of its derivative commandments. Rambam agrees that the text is the basis for understanding Judaism, and that interpretation must rely on the original meaning. He is not dismissive of the fact that a major element in Judaism is debate over textual interpretation, as done throughout the Talmud and over the centuries of active Jewish life. The meaning of the text is not always simple, and interpretation of Torah and Mitzvot is rarely ever straightforward.

Rambams introduction perfectly aligns with the originalist approach to Judaism. Originalism does not imply that the text should be interpreted at face value, but rather that it should be thoroughly analyzed to discover the meaning as the writers intended. Texts are multifaceted and their interpretation raises complexity and debate, whether in the Supreme Court or the beit midrash. If interpretation was simple, there would be no need for the Supreme Court, and the Talmud would not exist. Many aspects in the Constitution, from the Second Amendment to the Necessary and Proper Clause, cause debate over the intention of the framers, and to what extent they apply. Antonin Scalia, Rambam and those who preach textual originalism and judicial restraint alike understand that texts need to be closely read, analyzed and understood beyond surface level, while staying within the framework of the text.

This is the majority view of the current justices ruling from the Supreme Court bench, and this method protects the integrity of the founding documents that created an outline for how to run and maintain the government of the United States.

However, the living document theory encourages texts to be interpreted as the reader sees fit, and this interpretive style provides a basis for opposing outcomes: any verdict could be justified and explained without a textual basis. Judicial interpretation in this style leads to overstepping the constitutional jurisdiction of the Judicial Branch, and a complete violation of checks and balances. If you want to shape policy, run for Congress, but leave the Supreme Court out of it.

My own personal appreciation for the letter of the law is fueled by both my religious observance and my political ideology. Textual originalism is a practice that has been utilized for centuries, and its ramifications and implications play a major role in shaping our daily lives.President Biden stated that the Constitution is always evolving slightly in terms of additional rights or curtailing rights. With a claim like this threatening the very integrity of the Constitution, I recommend we focus more on the judicial-political philosophy at stake with Judge Ketanji Brown Jacksons nomination than the unfortunate identity politics that have stolen the headlines.

Photo Caption: Justices judicial philosophies have the power to reshape the Supreme Court, for better or worse.

Photo Credit: Tingey Injury Law Firm/ Unsplash

Original post:

The Pundit: Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's Nomination and the Jewish Approach to Textual Interpretation - The Commentator - The Commentator

In Egypt, Walking in the Footsteps of the Exodus – aish.com – Aish

Posted By on April 13, 2022

Guiding tours to the land of the Pharaohs, Ive gained an unexpected appreciation for Egyptians modern and ancient.

Call it the Exodus in reverse.

In growing numbers Israeli tour groups are flocking to Cairo, Luxor and Aswan to tour the sites of Egypt, and I recently led the first biblically themed kosher tour there. The exposure to Egypt, ancient and modern, is a mind-bending experience.

It hits you the moment you get on the highway from Cairo International Airport. Before you are two huge signs. To the right Nasser City, named for the dictator who sought Israels destruction in 1956 and 1967, and to the left, 6th of October City, erected in commemoration of the surprise attack against Israel on Yom Kippur, 1973.

I can vividly recall as a youngster sitting next to my father in shul on that Yom Kippur morning when the rabbi rose and announced, Israel has been attacked; we dont know where and we dont know by whom.

But blink an eye and this is what you now see: A kippah-wearing Jew jogging alone in Luxor and in Aswan greeted with applause and cheers as the locals call out morning greetings of Sabah al-khair!; 35 Jews walking through the densely packed souk of central Cairo on a Friday morning as hawkers looking to peddle their wares approach, calling Shalom U-vrachah!; Jews making a minyan for evening prayers in the lobby of the Cairo Ramses Hilton; local hotel kitchen staff checking their every move with our kashrut supervisor, eager to respect the laws of the Jews parallel to the Muslim dietary laws of halal.

In Egypt, for the first time in my life, I walked around a city where the vast majority of people were like me devout practitioners of their religion. There was something liberating about not sticking out like a sore thumb in a secular liberal landscape.

Here you read in hieroglyphs names like Miriam and Pinchas, and brush your hand over mud bricks with straw that date to the time of the enslavement in Egypt.

To tour the sites of ancient Egypt is truly to walk in the footsteps of the Exodus. Here you read in hieroglyphs names like Miriam and Pinchas (Pinchas, an Egyptian name? Who knew?), and brush your hand over mud bricks with straw that date to the time of the enslavement in Egypt.

Some of the discoveries are truly revealing. At the Seder table, we recall how God delivered Israel from Egypt with a mighty hand and an outstretched arm. Most would be surprised to learn that this biblical phrase is actually Egyptian in origin: Egyptian inscriptions routinely describe the Pharaoh as the mighty hand and his acts as those of the outstretched arm.

When the Torah describes God in the same terms used by the Egyptians to exalt their pharaohs, we see at work the dynamics of cultural appropriation. During much of its history, ancient Israel was in Egypts shadow. For weak and oppressed peoples, one form of cultural and spiritual resistance is to appropriate the symbols of the oppressor and put them to competitive ideological purposes.

Or consider this: when you write a sentence in hieroglyphs theres a special rule: if the sentence contains the name of a god, that gods name must be the first word in the sentence, no matter what it does to the syntax of the rest of the sentence. Think of a verse like Exodus 3:11: And Moses said to the Lord, who am I that I should go before Pharaoh? In hieroglyphs, youd have to write this, Lord Moses said to the who am I that I should go before Pharaoh? That makes reading this stuff incredibly difficult, but as a man of faith myself, the idea behind it resonated with me: put God first, and work your way around Him.

One of the participants excitedly showed me that we have the same phenomenon in Jewish law. The Torah says that the High Priest should wear a diadem inscribed with the words Holy to God (kodesh le-Hashem). But according to the Talmud (Shabbat 63b), this must be written in two lines: in the top line, the tetragrammaton alone, and in the lower line Holy to . And then it dawned on me: in sharing this God-first mentality, I have something significant in common with these idol-worshipping Jew-enslaving Egyptians of old that I dont with many of the people I consider good friends today.

None of this would be happening now without the Abraham Accords, whose tailwinds have carried Egypt along as part of the moderate Suni axis and its rapprochement with the Jewish State. Egyptair, which for years refused to fly its planes into Tel Aviv, now does so with daily service. To be sure, this is not for love of Zion but for love of mammon. The Egyptians want Israeli business travelers to transit to Africa through Cairo. They want Jews to visit Egypt because it helps their economy. But not so long ago, such interests couldnt overcome animosity and radical ideology.

These opportunities challenge us to look at them anew as they look at us anew as well. And, so, its a blessed time and a first step. Following the cadence of the Haggadah, we may say: this year is different than all other years. And even If we can now peacefully visit Egypt, but the Egyptians dont yet sing HaTikvah dayenu.

Feature image: Minchah prayers at the Sphinx. (courtesy, Sandor Joffe)

Originally appeared in the Times of Israel.

Read the rest here:

In Egypt, Walking in the Footsteps of the Exodus - aish.com - Aish

The Prince of Egypt Gets Part of The Exodus Wrong – Solzy at the Movies

Posted By on April 13, 2022

The Prince of Egypt may have beautiful animation and music but in retelling the story of the Exodus, they get part of it wrong.

While working as Chairman of Walt Disney Studios Jeffrey Katzenberg wanted to do an animated adaptation of the 1956 classic, The Ten Commandments. No matter how many times he mentioned this to then-Disney CEO Michael Eisner, the answerlike the many requests of Moses to Pharaohwas always no. With a no-go at Disney, Katzenberg would soon see it happen but only after joining with Steven Spielberg and David Geffen to form DreamWorks. If you will it, it is no dream, right?

In terms of animation, the film is solid with beautiful visuals that paint a picture of the era. Thats one thing about animation, you have a larger canvas to do things that are next to impossible in live-action without a lot of visual effects or building a lot of sets. Take the splitting of the sea, for instance. Its always fascinating to see how the different films split the Sea of Reeds/Red Sea. Everyone does it so differently. However, it was an all-night affairper Exodus 14 but you would not realize this from watching any of the films. They make the sea splitting happen quickly.

Musically speaking, theres nothing wrong with this aspect of movie. It was never going to be a large-scale animated remake of The Ten Commandments. Stephen Schwartz pens the songs while Hans Zimmer provides the score. Both would earn Oscar nominations for Musical/Comedy Score with Schwartz winning for Original Song with When You Believe. When Miriam and Zipporah sing the song in the film, the bridge includes excerpts from the Song of the Sea.

My rewatch comes days before Jews across the globe will retell the story of the Exodus during Pesach/Passover. Some might prep for the holiday with the DeMille classic or they could turn to this film instead. Both have their many flaws when it comes to the storytelling itself. Once we get to this aspect of the film, it features too many flaws for my comfort. Thats the thing with movies that draw from the Torah: they never get it right. They even bring on religious consultants and still manage to not tell the story correctly! Oh, they get the basic gist correct but there are many details in which the film gets it so wrong. Why is this so hard when the text is sitting right there? I mean, seriously. Between the Torah and the Talmud, the text spells it out so clearly!

Im an Orthodox Jew and so my approach to this film is informed by what Ive learned about the Exodus from Egypt. Whether its via Chabad or the many texts and translations offered by Sefaria, its this knowledge that informs my review. Listen, I know that any adaptation will not be 100% accurate but when filmmakers bring on religious consultants, it seems inexcusable that they still manage to get things wrong about the Exodus.

Right off the bat, Tuya says she will take Moses to Pharaoh. Thats right, in this film, it is both Seti and Tuya that adopt Moses as their son. In 1 Chronicles 4:18, the name given to Pharaohs daughter is Bithiah. Her given name at birth is recorded as Thermutis but went by Bithiah after converting to Judaism. According to Exodus 2, the way this happens in the film is wrong (See Sefaria for additional commentary). What the text says is that Pharaohs daughter sends off for a wet nurse from the Hebrews, which turns out to be Jochebed. There has been much debate over the years about who was Pharaoh during the Exodus but the scholarly consensus is that Rameses II was leading Egypt when the Israelites were freed. Seti very well could be the Egyptian king that died while Moses dwelt in Midian.

Speaking of Midian, there are midrashic texts that tell us where Moses is in the time after he flees Egypt. Unlike every film, he does not immediately go to Midian. Instead, he has a layover in Ethiopia where he serves as king. But again, no film or miniseries ever depict this aspect of his life. He is always wandering through the desert!

Just about every film depicts a relationship between Moses and Rameses II. Its highly possible that there was previous interaction but unlikely that they have a close relationship. Going off of the Torah, I find no reason to believe that they would be friendly when Moses returns to Egypt. The other thing is that it is a shock for Moses appears to learn that hes Hebrew. When one reads Exodus 2:11, one can only assume that Moses was aware of his origins. It should not be such a shock for Moses to learn that hes Hebrew. And yet, the film makes it appear this way. My guess is that it is for the dramatic effect. Speaking of Pharaoh, hes seen as the sole survivor as the Egyptian army chases after the Israelites. Exodus 14:28 and Psalm 136:15 state otherwise.

Lets move onto the Levites. The Levites were always destined for priesthood. Following the Exodus, they are the people who will be carrying the Ark of the Covenant. It is because of this that the Levites were never slaves. Why is it that you can see Aaron chiseling stone at one point? But before this, Egypt is holding Zipporah in the palace. Her first appearance in the Torah does not come until Moses arrives in Midian after killing an Egyptian slave driver. Is this one of those things where they force it into the story because of Moses eventually marrying her in Midian?

By the time that Moses returned to Egypt, he and Zipporah were the parents of two children. You would not know this from the movie because they have no children upon returning to Egypt. Im getting to Aarons portrayal in a moment but it is Aaron who persuades Moses to not bring his wife and children into Egypt. Anyone reading Rashi would know that Zipporah and the two children never make it down to Egypt. Otherwise, the text and commentaries in Exodus 18:2-3 would zero sense. That this film never even shows that Moses and Zipporah are the parents of Gershom and Eliezer is a disappointment let alone the fact that Zipporah makes it to Egypt during the Exodus.

Im not a fan of Aarons portrayal in the film. Hes one of the greatest leaders in Jewish history and was on board with the Exodus before Moses came back from Midian. All of this is in Exodus 4! In the film, Aaron blames Moses for the increased workloadreminder, Levites were never slaves in Egypt! Whenever Moses asks Pharaoh to let the Hebrews go in the movie, Aaron is never at his side. Nor is Aaron the one who strikes the edge of the Nile when the first plague comes around. Exodus 7:19-20 makes this clear as day. These are major issues and the film should have done better. Where is Joshua in all of this? Hes nowhere to be seen in the film even as he was a major figure during the Exodus from Egypt.

The Prince of Egypt works fine as a film but when you come into it knowing the story of the Exodus, there are too many flaws for comfort.

DIRECTORS: Brenda Chapman,Steve Hickner, Simon WellsSCREENWRITER: Philip LaZebnikCAST: Val Kilmer, Ralph Fiennes, Michelle Pfeiffer, Sandra Bullock, Jeff Goldblum, Danny Glover, Patrick Stewart, Helen Mirren, Steve Martin, Martin Short

Please subscribe to Solzy at the Movies on Substack.

Related

Read the original here:

The Prince of Egypt Gets Part of The Exodus Wrong - Solzy at the Movies

Israel’s Minister of the Hyphen – Tablet Magazine

Posted By on April 13, 2022

Its impossible to understand Matan Kahana, the surprise star of the current Israeli government, or to grasp the spirit of the coalition that has governed here for the past year, without the idea of the hyphen. The hyphen lies at the heart of the worldview of Kahana, a blunt ex-military officer who has stirred up more controversy, and has been called more awful names, than any other figure in the embattled government where he serves in what is usually a political backwater, the Ministry of Religious Services. The hyphen is at the heart of the crisis currently threatening to splinter the government, and will play a role in whatever political constellation ends up taking shape.

When Kahana, who is 49, was growing up in the 1980s, be the hyphen was an educational message drilled into religious-Zionist kids. The hyphen referred to what connected terms like religious-Zionist, for example, or Jewish-democratic, or Israeli-Jewish, or the communitys triangle of values: Torah of Israel-Land of Israel-People of Israel. These are all ideas with inherent tensions, sometimes just barely held together by bars of horizontal ink. Kahanas generation was going to embody the connection. They were going to excel at Talmud and at physics. They were going to be outdoorsy, salt-of-the-earth Israelis like the atheist kibbutzniks, and they were going to pray three times a day. Theyd be right wing in their outlook but would serve in the army with the most left-wing Israelis, dying with them and for them if necessary. Theyd take part in democratic politics, and theyd build settlements in the Land of Israel, demography be damned. The countrys contradictions would yield to their willpower and grit. Thats what they meant by being the hyphen.

As Kahana, speaking of his generation, put it in a recent speech to an audience of religious Zionists, We showed that its possible to do two things at onceto learn Torah and serve in the army. To excel and lead in the world of action, and to fear God. To disagree, but to fight to stay brothers. The speech was delivered with the characteristic force of someone used to leading soldiers, and with a sense that all of this is coming apart. Our rabbis, the great men of our generation, he said, addressing the rabbinic leadership present in the auditorium, you told us that our job was to be the hyphento connect the people of Israel to a life of Torah and labor.

read more by matti friedman

But now that he and his friends had done just that, rising through the ranks of the army and the civil service and taking their place in the center of Israeli society, they were being vilified by some of the same rabbis and political leaders for forming a government with the Israeli center and left. The extremism afflicting religious Zionism, he said, is splitting the Jewish people. Last week, pressure from the hard right succeeded in peeling off a member of his own party, Idit Silman, who shocked her colleagues by abandoning the unity coalition and defected to the rightist opposition led by Benjamin Netanyahu. Another member had already jumped ship months before. Silmans move has left the Knesset deadlocked and the coalition with just 60 votes, not enough to pass legislation.

Its difficult to think of someone who embodies the hyphen more than Matan Kahana. The oldest of five siblings in a family with roots in Germany, the son of an electrical engineer who was badly wounded in battle in 1967 but fought in two subsequent wars as an officer in the reserves, Kahana attended high school at Netiv Meir, a competitive yeshiva in Jerusalem that educated several generations of the religious-Zionist elite. The schools fortunes faded in the late 1990s when the principal, Zeev Kopolovitch, went to jail for sexually abusing pupils.

The crimes on the charge sheet happened after Kahana graduated, and he wasnt among the victims. But the affair was an earthquake for the sector known to Israelis as the knitted kippahs, undermining the faith of many in their leadership and institutions. It contributed to the current disarray among religious Zionists, who today are hardly a coherent group at all, but a loose affiliation of Israelis who vote for different political parties and dont listen to the same rabbis, or listen to rabbis at all. This is the privatization generation in the religious Zionist world, the journalist Yair Ettinger, one of the best observers of religion in Israel, wrote in a book called Prumim, or frayed, published in Hebrew in 2019 and due out in English later this year. (The title is a play on knitted, as in knitted kippahs.)

It is stronger, more diverse, more extreme, more moderate, more divided, more sectarian, and more nonsectarian all at once, he wrote. It is no longer united around a common focal point, but neither is it split into two coherent camps with their own centralized leaderships. It spans the vast space between conservatism and modernity. Thats Kahanas world.

Setting off for the army in the summer of 1990, Kahana was accepted by the commando unit Sayeret Matkal, one of the militarys toughest and most selective outfits, the same one that produced Prime Ministers Netanyahu and Ehud Barak, among many other famous Israelis. The unit had long been dominated by secular kibbutzniks, the countrys old elite, but when Kahana arrived things were already changing. Of 12 soldiers who managed to make it through training, four were observant, a number the unit hadnt seen before and didnt really know how to swallow. Their officer initially thought his orders superseded religious commandments, like prayer.

I met Kahana at the Ministry of Religious Services, which looks like the office of a small insurance company, complete with couches of fake black leather that have known better days and the backsides of many clerks and rabbis. I asked him what he thought happened to the kibbutzniks, or their secularist descendants, whod once dominated the countrys institutions and politics. Why, in so many influential positions, are you now far more likely to find someone shaped by religious Zionism?

In the end, there has to be a spirit behind the action, he answered. Sometimes, when something is difficult, you need to be able to come up with an explanation for why you should do it anyway, even though it may be uncomfortable and against your instincts. We have those explanations. We believe in God and the State of Israel, the first flowering of our redemption, and we embody what I believe to be the right connection between a life of Torah and a life of work. Thats why our young people are still full of energy.

Whatever the reason, his army squad illustrated the trend. One of the four other kippah-wearing soldiers with him from basic training was Emmanuel Moreno, later a legendary war hero who died as a lieutenant-colonel leading a raid inside Lebanon in 2006. Another was Naftali Bennett, currently the prime minister.

Serving in Sayeret Matkal is a stamp of accomplishment and can be a ticket into the top of Israeli society, but when he reached the end of his service, Kahana didnt join Bennett and his other comrades back in civilian life. Instead he tried out for flight school, the only military branch more illustrious than the one where hed just served. He got in, and spent the next 25 years flying F-16s, commanding a squadron and finally retiring a colonel in 2018. After that, he joined Bennett in his new political party Yamina (Rightward), just as Netanyahu was beginning to lose his grip and leading Israel into a spiral of inconclusive elections. He was an anonymous member of the party at the time of the big bang of Israeli politics last summer, when Bennett led Rightward leftward, abandoning Netanyahu and forming a coalition that included not just the left-wing parties Meretz and Labor but also a party of conservative Muslims. Although Rightward had only six Knesset seats, Bennett became prime minister in a rotation deal with the centrist Yair Lapid, and suddenly Kahana was at the center of power.

No one sane dreams of being the minister of religious services, which has always mostly entailed channeling funding and patronage to an Ottoman religious bureaucracy in charge of things like religious courts and ritual baths. But Kahana claims this was the only job he wanted. He felt the Jewish-democratic state splintering and identified this office as the fulcrum. I wanted this ministry, he told me, because I think someone like me can be the connecting hyphen.

Kahana came to the attention of many Israelis for the first time last June, after the formation of the new government, amid a furious day in the Knesset during which the Likud and the ultra-Orthodox parties, shocked to find themselves removed from power after 12 years, shouted down the coalitions speakers and disrupted attempts by the new government to present its platform. Lawmakers representing the ultra-Orthodox, a 10% minority that has long controlled the religious bureaucracy, were ripping into the new coalition as anti-religiouseven though it was headed by Bennett, the countrys first observant prime minister. The ultra-Orthodox MKs had been shouting at Bennett and Kahana to take off their kippahs.

At the podium, a furious Kahana directed a startling attack at one of the most vociferous of those lawmakers, Moshe Gafni. It wasnt one of the usual critiques you hear coming from the left in the Knesset, but a deeply religious one. I ask you, MK Gafniwhen did you ever lie in the rain in an ambush, in terrible cold, and recite the shemonah esreh prayer while lying down? Has that ever happened to you? Kahana roared. (The shemonah esreh must be recited standing up, and doing so lying downin this case, to avoid enemy detectionis highly unusual.) Of course the ultra-Orthodox politician, like most of his voters, had never been anywhere near military service. And when did you and Deri pray to God before going into battle? When did that happen? he continued, mentioning another ultra-Orthodox politician. Who on earth are you to teach us about the sanctification of Gods name? By the end of the exchange Gafni seemed deflated, and the new minister had gained admirers among Israelis watching him on TV.

The religious-secular fight has been going on since the creation of the state and is familiar to everyone here, but Kahana was saying something different. He wasnt speaking against religionhe was saying that he was religion, that his religious Zionism was as authentic as the non-Zionist stringency of the ultra-Orthodox, if not more so. He wasnt throwing out the rabbinic bureaucracy. He was saying the wrong rabbis were in charge.

It wasnt long before Kahanas ambitious legislative agenda became clear: a revolution that would end the ultra-Orthodox monopoly on the countrys religious officialdom. The rabbinates notoriously corrupt hold on kashruth supervision would be shattered and privatized. This was successfully done. Record numbers of women have already been appointed heads of local religious councils. His next goal, now complicated by the coalition crisis, is to move Jewish conversion from the auspices of the chief rabbinate, which is controlled by the ultra-Orthodox, to city rabbis, who are at least potentially more flexible, and more Zionist, and thus more sympathetic to the idea that conversion should be made more inviting in the interest of national cohesion. That move is designed to make it easier for Israelis who arent Jewish according to Jewish law to opt into Judaism. There are hundreds of thousands such citizens, mainly immigrants from the Soviet Union, some of them Kahanas former comrades-in-arms.

All of this was fought out in the Knesset over the past 10 months, hindered by the fact that Kahanas party has been afflicted not only by defections but by dispiriting poll results. He and Bennett have much support and sympathy from the center and left, but those people will never vote for him, and the partys actual constituency is slim. Kahanas changes have been met with furious resistance not only from ultra-Orthodox rabbis and politicians but from many hardliners inside the religious-Zionist camp who have moved far from the Israeli mainstream. Kahana and his political allies have been called the worst names that can be summoned up from the dark depths of Jewish history: Nazis, obviously, but also Antiochus, the evil king from the Hanukkah story, and apostates, Hellenizers, Sadducees. Israeli political discourse isnt polite, but at least its historically resonant.

This could easily be misunderstood by onlookers abroad, particularly liberal Western Jews eager to see someone take on the hegemony of the ultra-Orthodox. Kahana is not a liberal. Hes a different kind of religious conservative. Israel is an Orthodox country, he told me, and will remain that way in the absence of a wave of new immigrants from liberal Jewish denominations. A compromise to allow non-Orthodox prayer at the Western Wall should have passed years ago, he said, but hes not going to be the one to pass it now, because doing so would endanger the coalitions fragile hold on power. I dont want to disappoint my Reform brothers, and Im choosing my words carefullymy Reform brothers, he said. But Im an Orthodox Jew, a conservative. Part of this insistence is an attempt to protect his flank from attempts to portray him as a closet liberal intent on undermining traditional Judaism. But its mostly genuine. His reforms are not aimed at weakening the Jewish DNA of the state, but the opposite. He wants a more Jewish Israel. The less we force Judaism, he said, the more people will choose it.

These guys are standing up to the rabbis as no one has in the history of the state.

Facebook

Email

The story of Kahana and the ethos of the hyphen is bigger than him alone, and explains much about the current political moment, which can be bewildering to outsiders (and to insiders). The hyphen will continue to matter even if the government falls. It would be an overstatement to say that theres a new political elite in Israel, but theres certainly a new group key to the balance of powerone thats a bit tricky to pin down, because it doesnt conform to the simplistic ways weve always described our politics, and also because these people are spread over several political parties in the coalition.

They include, most obviously, Bennett, the first kippah-wearing prime minister, but also Yoaz Hendel, the communications minister, whos in a different political party and doesnt wear a kippah most of the time, and Elazar Stern, the intelligence minister, whos from a third political party, and members of the Knesset like Moshe Tur-Paz, an important figure from the world of education, whos in a fourth. There are other examples. What they share are roots in religious Zionism and often significant experiences as commanders in the army, where they grappled with Israeli society firsthand. (Its significant that of the two extreme figures leading the rival Knesset faction called Religious Zionism, the lawmakers Betzalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir, representing the far-right side of the world of the knitted kippahs, the former performed abbreviated service in a desk job and the latter didnt serve at all.) When Kahana talks about patriotic Israelis who arent Jewish according to Orthodox law and who need an easier path to conversion, hes not imagining an abstractionhes thinking about specific people like a woman from the air force squadron he commanded, Daria Leonteev, a bomb-loader of Soviet extraction whos as good an Israeli as they come, but whose kids wont be Jewish according to Jewish law. This upsets him personally, and he often mentions her in interviews.

For years, many on the Israeli left warned that the religious Zionists of the settlement movement were taking over the army, and that they took orders from rabbis, not from their commanders. One essay from 2014, by the sociologist Yagil Levy, was titled The Theocratization of the Israeli Military. A moment of truth arrived last spring, when the titanic political struggle that had dragged Israel through four elections came to a head, and the balance of power turned out to lie with Bennett and Kahana, the kind of people who were supposedly theocratizing the army. Not only did they not take power from Israeli liberals, but they actually put liberals back in power for the first time in years. And not only do they not blindly obey rabbis, as the journalist Yair Ettinger told me: These guys are standing up to the rabbis as no one has in the history of the state. Thats wild, and its the heart of the story. The process turned out to be a lot more complicated than the critics had thought, if not precisely the opposite.

Whatever the course of Israeli politics in the next few years, and whatever the personal fortunes of Matan Kahana and his comrades, old designations like settlers, right wing, and knitted kippahs arent going to be particularly helpful in understanding whats going on, because those generalizations no longer predict political behavior. The people who believe that the unity of Israel, its people, and institutions is a religious value as important as any other will be key to events, whether theyre in power or out. As the country is subjected to forces of political disintegration, the people of the hyphen will try to hold things together.

Read the original here:

Israel's Minister of the Hyphen - Tablet Magazine

Hadas Fruchter Is a New Kind of Orthodox Jewish Leader – The Wall Street Journal

Posted By on April 11, 2022

Hadas Fruchter never aspired to be a rabbi when she was growing up. She couldnt: The job didnt yet exist for Modern Orthodox women. Eager to combine her knack for making people feel loved and seen with her devotion to Judaism, she figured she would run a Jewish nonprofit and try to marry a rabbi. I didnt really see how I could build community and give of myself in a deep and spiritual way, she says.

Her life took a turn in 2011 when she met Rabba Sara Hurwitz, the first Orthodox Jewish woman in America to be publicly ordained.Rabba Hurwitz (whose title is the female equivalent of rabbi in Hebrew) talked about Yeshivat Maharat in the Bronx, N.Y., the only U.S. seminary that ordains women as Orthodox clergy, which she co-founded in 2009. Rabbanit Fruchter (who uses a different but analogous title) says she felt a kind of tingling: I realized this was exactly what I was supposed to do.

Link:

Hadas Fruchter Is a New Kind of Orthodox Jewish Leader - The Wall Street Journal


Page 420«..1020..419420421422..430440..»

matomo tracker