Page 489«..1020..488489490491..500510..»

United Synagogue cautiously welcomes early lifting of restrictions – Jewish News

Posted By on February 11, 2022

The United Synagogue has cautiously welcomed plans to lift remaining Covid restrictions, announced by Boris Johnson today.

Speaking during Prime Ministers Questions, the PM said the government is likely to end the requirement for people with the virus to self-isolate in less than two weeks time.

The current restrictions were due to expire on March 24 but Johnson said he intends to lift them by 24 February.

Get The Jewish News Daily Edition by email and never miss our top storiesFree Sign Up

In a move that could allow communal life to return to some sort of normality, the PM told MPs:Provided the current encouraging trends in the data continue, it is my expectation that we will be able to end the last domestic restrictions, including the legal requirement to self-isolate if you test positive, a full month early.

Steven Wilson, Chief Executive of the United Synagogue, said: Were pleased to see the country continuing its path towards living as we knew it before the pandemic.

We wait to see the governments full guidance later this month to see how it might impact members attending shul and events and will respond accordingly.

In the most recent advice sent to community leaders, the US said on 27 January one of its aims was to encourage people back to in-person shul activity, but stressed decisions should be taken locally.

Each community should consider when setting local policy bearing in mind the age profile of its members, its building and the wider local context, it said.

Communities are also told to ensure balancing the need for people to feel welcome, comfortable and safe in shul, with masks, social distancing and ventilation.

The US stresses that under current rules, members must not attend if they have received a positive Lateral Flow or PCR result or are required to self-isolate.

Where members live in the same household as someone with Covid we recommend communities either ask them not to attend or ask them to take two tests in a 24 hour period, while wearing a mask at shul.

The governments decision is based around evidence that the Omicron strain of the virus is less potent than earlier Covid-19 infections.

The PMs spokesman clarified that the Government would not recommend people with Covid go to work. But they said the legal requirement to self-isolate would be scrapped if hospital admissions continue to fall.

The rest is here:

United Synagogue cautiously welcomes early lifting of restrictions - Jewish News

Labour’s war on the wrong type of Jew – Jewish News

Posted By on February 11, 2022

Earlier this month it emerged that the Labour Party had abandoned an investigation into the political or, if you prefer, philosophical beliefs of an 82-year-old Jewish woman and party member, Diana Neslen.

According to the Guardian, which broke this story, Neslen has been investigated no less than three times in less than three years for tweets she had authored concerning Israel and Zionism. Neslen is an anti-Zionist Jew who makes no secret of her distaste for the Jewish state, which she regards as a racist endeavour.

In 2018, after a great deal of debate, Labour adopted the definition of antisemitism espoused by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance. One of the examples appended to this contentious definition alleges that antisemitism is Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g. by claiming that the existence of a state of Israel is a racist endeavour. Diana Neslens tweet had clearly challenged the argument underlying this example. Thus began Labours ill-conceived investigation of her conduct.

Under threat of legal action, this investigation has now been abandoned. But it should never have been started.

I say this as a proud Zionist who does not believe that Israel is or ever was a racist endeavour. But as an historian of British Jewry I call to mind a time when anti-Zionism was fashionable even widespread among the Anglo-Jewish ruling elites.

In 1897 no less a Jewish cleric than Hermann Adler, chief rabbi of the United Synagogue, condemned the forthcoming First Zionist Congress as an egregious blunder and denounced the very idea of a Jewish state as contrary to Jewish principles. Adler was, indeed, the only western European rabbi to contribute to a collection of anti-Zionist articles, by many leading Jewish ecclesiastics, published in Warsaw in 1900 under the title Or Layesharim [`Light unto the Righteous].

No less a Jewish cleric than Hermann Adler, chief rabbi of the United Synagogue, denounced the very idea of a Jewish state as contrary to Jewish principles.

Among the elites that ran British Jewry during the first half of the 20th century Zionism was feared not least because so their argument went it played into the hands of home-grown antisemites, who might argue indeed who did argue that if the Jews were a nation, with a right to national self-determination, let them leave Great Britain and migrate to wherever this nation-state might be established.

Prominent among those who so argued was Edwin Montagu (a son of the ultra-orthodox founder of the Federation of Synagogues, Samuel Montagu), who became Secretary of State for India in July 1917. In that position he was the strongest opponent, in Lloyd Georges wartime Cabinet, of what became known as the Balfour Declaration.

A week after the Balfour Declaration had been published there was formed the League of British Jews, which boasted all the leading Anglo-Jewish anti-Zionists among its founders. Its president was the Conservative MP Lionel de Rothschild; Sir Philip Magnus was a vice-president; other members included David Lindo Alexander (a former president of the Board of Deputies), Edwin Montagus elder brother, Louis, who had succeeded his father as President of the Federation, and Claude Goldsmid Montefiore, a founder of the Liberal Jewish Synagogue, who was in due course to accuse the Zionist movement of having aided and abetted the rise of Nazism in inter-war Germany.

Talking of the Liberal Jewish Synagogue should remind us that its first rabbi, Israel Mattuck (died 1954) was an enthusiastic outspoken anti-Zionist all his life. And need I add that many charedim today, if not strictly speaking anti-Zionist (many are, of course), are certainly non-Zionist in outlook?

According to Jewish Voice for Labour, to which Diana Neslen belongs, there are currently over 40 Jewish members of the Labour party facing disciplinary proceedings relating to allegation of antisemitism.

I do not know and have never met Diana Neslen. If I were to meet her, I might be tempted to challenge her anti-Zionist views. What I would never be tempted to do is to accuse her of being in any way antisemitic.

Professor Geoffrey Alderman is an academic, author and journalist

Read more here:

Labour's war on the wrong type of Jew - Jewish News

I’m a Catholic friar and also a Jew; the Law of Return should work for me – The Times of Israel

Posted By on February 11, 2022

Everyone has a summer that he or she will never forget. Usually it is connected with a beautiful place and a nicely sentimental story. My summer was August 1990. The place was Jerusalem more precisely Mount Scopus, where I was attending a summer ulpan of intensive Hebrew. If this month left an indelible mark in my memory, it was not because of a sentimental story however. The Gulf War had just started, and I was wondering whether Israel would be dragged into a conflict that would then spread like wildfire to the whole region. I found it difficult to concentrate on my daily pile of homework, as I was constantly drawn back to the prospect of a fateful personal decision. Either a war with Israel would break out, and I would enroll in the IDF after a hasty aliyah process, or there would be no war, and I would go back to Paris to enter the Dominican Order, one of the ancient monastic Orders of the Catholic Church. The Gulf War was not over at the end of August 1990, but it had manifestly spared Israel. I went back to Paris, and I was given the Dominican garb on September the 14th. This decision put an end to my career as a warrior, yet another onfirmation that God knows what He is doing with the IDF.

I surmise that my state of mind during that summer of 1990 will come as a bit of a shock for anyone who happens to read these lines a surmountable one, though, in a country that has been left somewhat jaded by extensive experience of many possible styles of craziness. Why would someone whose God is different from the God of the Jews and whose religious community has displayed such fierce hostility towards the nation of Israel throughout the past 2,000 years let us shroud the appalling anti-Jewish policies of an Inquisition run by Dominican friars in a dignified silence even contemplate giving his life for the State of Israel? The truth is that, rightly or wrongly, I did not see it that way at the time.

True, my whole family was Jewish and proudly so. The family tree established by my grandmother points to Isaac Abarbanel (1508), the treasurer of Isabella the Catholic, as our most famous ancestor. Over the course of my childhood, I repeatedly heard how Abarbanel had decided to join his people on the path of exile in 1492, although he had been offered to stay by the queen as an exceptional privilege. As a grownup, I never questioned the deep-seated Zionist convictions that I had inherited from my parents. Still, in contrast to my ferociously anti-religious parents, I chose to believe in a Jewish Messiah that Jews had dismissed as a fake one. I joined a Church that, after two millennia of Christian persecutions against Jews, had eventually disowned her own antisemitic stances of the past and radically changed her attitude towards Jews. I never felt that I should renounce my Jewish identity or my Zionist political convictions by joining the Catholic Church.

I certainly understood that a crushing majority of Jews thought otherwise. For them, the one who the rabbinic tradition calls Yeshu deserves the nickname aher the other even more than Elisha ben Abuyah, the disgraced colleague of Rabbi Akiva. All manners of Christians are aherim. They cannot be Jews by definition. Knowing that most rabbis would feel deeply uncomfortable dealing with a Christian who claims to be a very different kind of Jew, I have carefully avoided getting involved in theological discussions between rabbis and Christian theologians during the course of my career as a Dominican priest.

Many will think that, in my situation, I would have done equally well staying clear of the State of Israel too. As much as I am sorry to disappoint them, here I am. After many years of ministry, among other things as an academic in Finland, I find myself currently established in Jerusalem as a member of a Dominican community. Admittedly, I am walking in the footsteps of dozens hundreds at some point of Catholics of Jewish descent. Like them, I did not come to proselytize among Jews (an activity that, by the way,has now been officially rejected by the Catholic Church). I came here to live side by side with the people to which I belong. Like these Catholic faithful of Jewish descent, I acted upon the inner conviction that there is a lot more to being Jewish than a specific religious creed or an affiliation to a particular type of synagogue. I came to witness the fact that the unity of the Jewish nation stands deeper and stronger than the anathemas that some categories of Jews are wont to cast upon other categories of Jews.

Meanwhile I quickly realized that being physically in Israel is a far cry from being able to take part in the life and destiny of the State of Israel. Foreign citizens who were granted a so-called religious visa are not allowed to work and are usually satisfied with remaining within their Christian ghettos, at a good social distance from the life of ordinary Israeli citizens. Personally, I am forbidden to apply for citizenship through the Law of Return. The reason for it a paradox I wrestle with day after day is that I am halachically Jewish. Things would be much simpler if I could count a single so-called Goy among my closest relatives. Indeed, here comes paragraph 4B, a clause that was added to the Law of Return in 1970: For the purposes of this Law, Jew means a person who was born of a Jewish mother or has become converted to Judaism and who is not a member of another religion.

I do not think that the mention of another religion has ever been applied to Jews who became Buddhists for example. But it is crippling in the case of Jews who, being halachically Jewish, have embraced the faith of Christians.

When one goes back to the reasons that explain the addition of paragraph 4b to the Law of Return; namely, the deliberations of the High Court regarding the case of the Carmelite Father Oswald Rufeisen, the hero of the Mir ghetto (known widely as Brother Daniel or Father Daniel), one cannot help being struck by the combination of logic and human depth displayed by Justice Asher Felix Landau. Let me quote the sentence that summarizes his whole argument: By changing his religion, [Oswald Rufeisen] has erected a barrier between himself and his brother Jews, especially as this change has assumed so extreme a form as entering the gates of a monastery.

I was born in 1962, the year the High Court rejected Rufeisens application for citizenship according to the Law of Return. Two years later, in 1964, the Catholic Church made amends for the accusation of deicide leveled at Jews a charge that had caused centuries of Christian persecution in the most solemn fashion (declaration Nostra Aetate of Vatican Council II). Throughout the more than half a century that followed, the Catholic Church issued numerous statements of repentance regarding past Christian antisemitism. These decades also witnessed a previously unheard-of blossoming of the theological dialogue between the Catholic Church and various rabbinic authorities within Judaism. Accordingly, the question reads: To what extent should Israeli legislation be beholden to the memory of the past? In other words, to what extent does this legislation allow for people and institutions to change? These days, a Jew who joins the Catholic Church does not ipso facto manifest a will to cut him/herself off from Klal Yisrael, the congregation of Israel. This is an option left to the individual faithful. Still, a Jewish Catholic may also decide to remain bound to Klal Yisrael, at the cost of his or her life if needed.

I am fully aware of the seriousness of this issue. The conversion of a Jew to Christian faith hurts on both sides, that of Jews who see themselves separated from their nation and that of Jews who view apostates as people who deliberately betrayed Klal Yisrael, its values, and its history. I would not turn the knife in the wound if I did not feel that threatening global trends constrained me to do so. On January 27, 2022, The Times of Israel reported that antisemitic incidents had increased by 75% in France in 2021. A day before, the same newspaper published the results of another inquiry: Most Israelis believe life will get worse for Jews in Europe in near future. Does anyone among the 53% of Israelis who believe so seriously think that antisemites in Europe distinguish between Orthodox Jews, secular Jews, and Jews who decided to become members of another religion? For my part, the last time I opened a book in Hebrew in the Paris metro was about 10 years ago. I swore to myself that I would never repeat this experience, due to the amount of hostile looks and attitudes that this trifling gesture immediately triggered around me.And I can assure you that, like most French Jews in a similar context, I was not wearing a kippah!

Of course, the idea of a European government issuing antisemitic measures on the model of the Nuremberg Laws of 1935, remains a speculative conjecture at this point in time. However, this is an issue of principle on a par with the series of issues that shape the laws of a democratic state. The laws of Nuremberg did not distinguish between kosher Jews and non-kosher Jews, such as Jewish converts. Jewish converts died in Nazi concentration camps alongside Orthodox Jews. One among them was the famous philosopher, Carmelite nun, and Catholic St. Edith Stein, on whose philosophical works I am currently writing a doctorate. Imagine a European government that would take its cue from the Nazi era. Would the current Israeli state let a new Edith Stein perish again in some European concentration camp under the pretense that she is not sufficiently kosher to be granted citizenship according to the Law of Return? An Israeli state that would do so would certainly not be my country. But I cannot believe the Israeli state would do that. That is why I consider Israel to be my country, whether its government ever acknowledges it or not.

The above reflects my private opinion. In no way do I claim to voice the position of the religious Order to which I belong or the community of which I am a member.

Fr. Antoine Levy, OP, is an adjunct professor at the University of Helsinki (Department of Theology), and currently a research fellow at the Rosenzweig Center of the Hebrew University. He is also a founding member of the Helsinki Consultation, a forum of Christian theologians and intellectuals of Jewish descent.

More:

I'm a Catholic friar and also a Jew; the Law of Return should work for me - The Times of Israel

As a South African Jew, Amnesty’s ‘apartheid’ label for Israel is absurd J. – The Jewish News of Northern California

Posted By on February 11, 2022

The recent report from Amnesty International UK, replete with distortions of reality, contained no surprises. It follows in the wake of similar reports from Human Rights Watch and BTselem, all aimed at delegitimizing Israel and casting the Jewish state in the worst possible light, including the calumny of labeling it an apartheid state.

The slander of Israels enemies knows no limits!

Amnestys report labeling Israel an apartheid state refers not only to recent years but dates back to the very founding of the state in 1948. From Year 1, Amnesty claims the Jewish state merits the title and as such should be removed from the family of nations.

And in Amnestys amen corner, there are echoes from the chorus of Israel haters, such as the horrendously named Jewish Voice for Peace, terrorist organizations Hamas and Hezbollah, and individuals from both the far left and the far right.

However, in addition to the most prominent U.S. Jewish groups and organizations who have punched back hard are the voices and support of lawmakers in the United Kingdom, Germany, Israel and the United States.

As a South African who lived through the worst excesses of the apartheid state, and who also lived in Israel for periods of time and visited the country several times, I can attest that the connection is an absurd and spurious one.

For the first 40 years of my life I lived in South Africa, where every aspect of ones life was regulated and determined by ones racial group.

Blacks, Coloreds or Mixed Race and Indian peoples were, by law, told where they could live, go to school, which university they could attend, where they could swim, which movie theater they could enter, where they could eat and where they could play. And only whites had the right to vote in elections. Whites Onlysigns were ubiquitous. Institutionalized discrimination existed for decades, affected and afflicted the dispossessed, people of color, cruelly and viciously.

Needless to say, this bears absolutely no resemblance to a country where an Arab judge sentenced a former Jewish president to a prison term, where Arab doctors head the countrys most prestigious hospitals, where Jewish scientists and Muslim scientists working side by side are at the forefront of breakthroughs in scientific innovations and discoveries.

One-fifth of Israels population is Arab.Muslims and Christians are entitled to whatever rights and privileges a democratic country can offer.

Hardly sounds like apartheid as I remember it and to label Israel as such is a disservice and insulting to the millions who suffered under the real apartheid.

American Jews need to make their voices of disgust and opposition to Amnestys report heard as loudly and forcefully as they can. The knives are out, the enemies are baying for the demise of Israel and we should not be found wanting.

See the article here:

As a South African Jew, Amnesty's 'apartheid' label for Israel is absurd J. - The Jewish News of Northern California

His great-grandparents found refuge in China. Now this Canadian Jew is starting for its hockey team. – Forward

Posted By on February 11, 2022

Most of Ethan Wereks teammates on the Chinese Olympic hockey team had never met a Jewish person before he joined the roster.

But Wereks family tree was once planted in Chinese soil.

Like the six athletes suiting up for Israel in this years games, Werek didnt need to be born in the country on his jersey to play for its national team. Yet his right-of-return story is no less Jewish than theirs and it predates the Jewish state. How this Canadian came to play for the Chinese national team is a Jewish homecoming more than a century in the making.

In a way, playing for the hockey team is Werek returning the assist China gave his ancestors.

As the 2022 host country, China automatically qualified for Olympic hockey, but because it had a weak national program, it needed to naturalize professional players with connections to the nation. Enter Werek, a journeyman forward drafted by the New York Rangers in 2009 who has since played in various pro leagues.

I kind of pinch myself every morning, he said in a phone interview from the Olympic village in Beijing. I just feel so lucky to be given this opportunity.

Courtesy of Ethan Werek

Werek playing for HC Kunlun Red Star, the KHL team based in Beijing.

There was also a career benefit to Chinese citizenship: it made it easier for him to play in the KHL, the top hockey league outside of North America which has a franchise in Beijing. Hes played on that team since 2019. During hockey season in China, Werek has taken the time to visit the synagogue his grandparents used to attend. Their names are still engraved in the building.

An only child, Werek grew up in a household that celebrated Jewish holidays, though his fondest memories formed at the table of an aunt who cooked a disgusting amount of food for seders.

A rising hockey star at 17, he moved to play junior hockey in Kingston, Ontario, where he boarded with a Jewish family. With games most Friday nights, his hosts would prepare an early Shabbat dinner so that he could fill up on challah before heading to the rink. (He still talks to them every week.)

I was like, oh my God, Ive been there before, Ive played there before, Werek recalled, and just that connection over time the water slides outside the rink and everything it was just so cool.

Get the Forward delivered to your inbox. Sign up here to receive our essential morning briefing of American Jewish news and conversation, the afternoons top headlines and best reads, and a weekly letter from our editor-in-chief.

Perhaps owing to a dearth of ponds that freeze over in the winter, Israels hockey program makes Chinas look like Russias. So Werek has volunteered to contribute to establishing the sport more firmly there this summer. Hes going to live in Tel Aviv and help out with the Israel Elite Hockey League, a one-month semi-pro league, by running hockey camps at the two rinks in the Tel Aviv area with part of the goal to make equipment more accessible to kids.

Anything I can do to grow the game there, he said.

In the meantime, hes an Olympian. The Chinese team will be an experiment in communication half of its 24 players speak only Mandarin and the other half (plus the head coach) speak only English. While the team has a pair of translators on staff, it wont have one in skates.

Werek, who was assigned a Chinese name, Wei Ruike, for fans to use, can barely pronounce it.

Ive gotten pretty good at charades and hand gestures, he said.

Courtesy of Ethan Werek

Werek, far left, with teammates in the Olympic village.

He has learned how to say Happy New Year in Mandarin, though.

And hes not put off by the fact that Judaism is alien to most of his teammates. Hes used to it.

Back in Ontario, Canada, while playing junior hockey, Werek befriended a teammate from a small town and invited him to his Jewish host familys house during Hanukkah, not long after they had lit the menorah.

He looked at the table, Werek recalled. He goes, Oh, candles fancy dinner!

Wereks Chinese teammates have not benefited from the sort of training and opportunities afforded talented Canadians. They have never sniffed international competition, and even without active NHL players in this years Olympics, China is a steep underdog. But Werek says in spite of the language barrier, hes bonded with the team, and enjoyed teaching them the finer points of the game. His enthusiasm has sparked his own.

I guess in hockey at the age of 30, Im kind of the older age, he said. But I feel I got a shot of youth just being around these guys and seeing their passion for it.

How to watch team China mens hockey this week:

China vs. U.S.A.: Feb. 10, 8-10:30 a.m. on USA

China vs. Germany: Feb. 12, 3:40am on Peacock

China vs. Canada: Feb. 13, 8:10 a.m. on Peacock

Special thanks to the Jewish Sports Review.

His great-grandparents found refuge in China. Now this Canadian Jew is starting for its hockey team.

See original here:

His great-grandparents found refuge in China. Now this Canadian Jew is starting for its hockey team. - Forward

Muslims and Jews Unite to Speak Uncomfortable Truths – Algemeiner

Posted By on February 11, 2022

What does it say about America when members of the media and public figures have an acute allergy to speaking the unabashed truth about antisemitism? At least a certain kind of antisemitism.

If the hostage-taking Colleyville terrorist had been a card-carrying Klan member, so many people would have been quick to publicize this fact. Instead, these same people rushed over themselves to deny the Islamist antisemitism of Malik Faisal Akram, who took Jews hostage in a synagogue on Shabbat.

If the Jewish venue and victims were not big enough clues to his motivation, consider Akrams plan was itself an antisemitic trope. There is nothing as antisemitic as the belief that every Jew, no matter who or where they are, is part of a powerful conspiracy capable of springing Aafia Siddiqui (known as Lady Al-Qaeda) from her well-deserved 86-year prison sentence.

Siddiqui, an alumna of MIT (BS) and Brandeis (PhD), as well as the niece-in-law of 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, was caught in Afghanistan in possession of notes in her own handwriting that listed possible American targets for a mass casualty attack. During her interrogation, she grabbed a gun, and attempted to murder US personnel.

February 11, 2022 1:01 pm

I have just readJacob Katz: On the Origins of Orthodoxy.It is an important collection of articles by and about the...

An icon of ISIS, [h]er release has long been sought by militant Islamists, according to NBC News, and even mainstream U.S. Muslim groups have said she is innocent and should be freed.

To be clear, any US Muslim group or individual (like CAIR, or disgraced ex-Womens March organizer Linda Sarsour), who considers Siddiqui innocent is not mainstream; they are self-identifying extremists and need to be treated accordingly.

It is disingenuous for CAIR to claim to care about the Colleyville terror attack while campaigning to release a convicted terrorist and vicious Jew-hater. Furthermore, some have claimed that the campaigns to release Siddiqui may have helped inspire the hostage taker in Texas to commit his crime.

For too long, parts of the Muslim American community have tolerated or even promoted antisemitism sometimes in overt denunciations of Jews, and sometimes under the cover of attacking supporters of Israel.

Muslim Americans are ill-served by Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) celebrating the removal of Israel from a map in her office; Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-MN)s antisemitic rhetoric on Twitter; and CAIRs leadership, such as Zahra Billoo, declaring polite Zionists are the enemy. Less than two months before Akrams attack, Billoo, CAIRs Bay Area Executive Director, publicly condemned Zionist synagogues. This kind of dangerous hate speech has festered, spread antisemitism, and sowed seeds of distrust between Muslims and their fellow Americans.

And that is exactly what the Islamists want. Portraying themselves as the majority of Muslims, Islamists are making common cause with Islamophobes to isolate and indoctrinate Muslims. Both groups feed off each other to advance their agendas; it is a double-edged sword that dis-empowers mainstream Muslim Americans, regardless of their political leanings, or religious observance.

Therefore, its time to call out this bigotry, unequivocally. The Muslim American Leadership Alliance (MALA) and American Sephardi Federation (ASF)s partnership proves there is a better way, rooted in shared culture, creativity, solidarity, and shared interests. Together, we have long promoted grassroots efforts to strengthen relations between Muslims and Jews.

Our work together challenges the narrative of sowing seeds of distrust by lifting voices from a generation that yearns for collaboration and co-existence. ASF and MALA have bought together hundreds of Muslim and Jewish young professionals, and undertaken countless initiatives to benefit Jews and Muslims alike, including serving Kosher and Halal meals to Ronald McDonald House, and cherishing the shared heritages of both communities, from Holocaust commemorations to Hebrew and Arabic calligraphy classes.

Our children deserve a future of peace and prosperity one that can only be gained through breaking the cycle of hate, violence, and prejudices. They should not inherit the mistakes of our current generation, one that clearly still has not learned its lessons on combating hate.

We cannot stay silent when the mainstream is being defined by extremists whose hateful ideology cannot be ignored, explained away, or appeased. We must oppose these efforts, and our message of unconditional unity and support must remain strong. We invite you to be a part of it.

Zainab Zeb Kahn is the Chair & Executive Director of the Muslim American Leadership Alliance (MALA), and Jason Guberman is the Executive Director of the American Sephardi Federation (ASF). Both are part of Combating Racism and Antisemitism Together: Shaping an Omni-American Future.

Visit link:

Muslims and Jews Unite to Speak Uncomfortable Truths - Algemeiner

Ner Tamid in every Jewish soul – Cleveland Jewish News

Posted By on February 11, 2022

Our portion opens with, As for you, you shall command the Israelites that they take you clear oil of beaten olives for the light, lhaolot ner tamid to raise a lamp perpetually. (Exodus 27:20) Rashi understands tamid as continually, as described here, doing something every night. The lamp burned from evening until daybreak, and was lit again each evening by the priestly attendants, using a special oil to rekindle this light.

Rami bar Hama taught that one may interpret the verse homiletically: The requirement is to light the candelabrum so that the flame ascends of itself when it is kindled, and not that it ascends by means of something else, i.e., adjusting the wick after it was lit. (Shabbat 21a) This pure olive oil ignites a flame that is self-kindling.

Over time, the term ner tamid became synonymous with eternal light the ever present and ever burning light in the sanctuary that hangs in front of the ark; an ever-present reminder of our connection to God and what it means to be part of the Jewish people.

This eternal light shines in each of us, as it is written: A candle/light of God is the soul of man. (Proverbs 20:27) Over our history as a people, our history as individuals, this light has continued to shine sometimes more intensely than others. What keeps it lit? Our Jewish tradition connects that light with the expression a pintele Yid Gods Presence (the Hebrew letter Yud) buried deep in the soul of each and every Jew (the Yiddish expression Yid). No matter where one finds oneself on the continuum of Jewish life and practice, each of us has the power to self-kindle that flame through seeking, through learning, through living a Judaism that brings more meaning and more depth into our lives.

Each of us has a spark inside,

A warm and special glow.

It s a quiet flame that never dies,

The Ner Tamid in every Jewish soul.

An eternal light through history,

Sometimes bright and sometimes dim:

But always there in each of us

shining from within.

Rabbi Enid C. Lader is the rabbi at Beth Israel-The West Temple in Cleveland and is the president of the Greater Cleveland Board of Rabbis.

Continued here:

Ner Tamid in every Jewish soul - Cleveland Jewish News

Jews (not the Shoah, not the UN) created Israel – The Jewish Star

Posted By on February 11, 2022

By Ken Cohen, FLAME

In the course of a few days in January 1942 80 years ago Hitlers henchmen, including SS chieftain Reinhard Heydrich, Adolf Eichmann and other top members of the Third Reich, conferred at a villa in Wannsee, Germany to engineer the Final Solution to the Jewish problem.

The notorious Wannsee Conference succeeded in creating an efficient, industrial-scale approach to the Holocaust. Its extensive chain of death camps and gas chambers accomplished ultimately unimaginably the murder of 6 million Jews

But this horror neither prevented the birth of the Jewish state nor did it contrary to the narrative of many Israel haters provide an excuse for Israels formation.

Ironically, many of those who oppose the State of Israel today blame its existence on the success of the murderous plans drawn up at Wannsee. Israels enemies minimize the righteousness of its birth in 1948 by attributing the Zionists achievement to global sympathy over the loss of Europes Jews, as if the most devastating genocide in world history would not justify the formation of the first Jewish state.

This objection to Israel conjures up the image of the United Nations and a few Western nations imposing a Jewish nation on native Arabs living in Palestine. This version has Israel created in a fit of guilt by the worlds nations because they stood by as the Holocaust unfolded. Israel is, according to the myth, a guilt-offering to compensate for the worlds indifference to the slaughter.

Indeed, one of the most pernicious lies about Israels creation is that it was born due to the Holocaust, a result of the United Nations Partition Plan of 1947. The truth is, Israel was created by the Jews themselves as a result of more than a half-century of organizing.

As Israels Prime Minister Naftali Bennett recently said, reflecting on Wannsees significance: The State of Israel isnt ours thanks to the Holocaust but because the Land of Israel was, is and will always remain the home of the Jewish people.

The myth continues that Holocaust guilt reached a pinnacle on Nov. 29, 1947, when the UN General Assembly voted to partition the British Mandate for Palestine into Jewish and Arab lands. Thus, the narrative insists, Europe soothed its torment over the Jews at the expense of Arabs.

What makes this tidy narrative nonsense? Four facts:

1) Jews are the indigenous people of Palestine, preceding Arab arrival by some two millennia and having maintained a continuous presence and several periods of sovereignty in this land over some 3,000 years, since the Kingdom of David in 1,000 BCE.

2) The Arabs, who did not define themselves as Palestinians until 1964, have never had sovereignty or even control over Palestine.

3) The formation of the State of Israel in Palestine was preceded by determined Zionists and Zionist organizing that began officially in 1897 with the first Zionist Congress 45 years before the shame of Wannsee.

4) A distinct ambivalence and even outright opposition towards a Jewish state in Palestine predominated in many nations, including Great Britain and the United States.

While Great Britain deserves credit for the 1917 Balfour Declaration, it quickly worked to undo its effects, violating its League of Nations-granted mandate by carving out two-thirds of the land for what became Jordan. Then, it promulgated the infamous 1939 Palestine White Paper which virtually eliminated Jewish immigration to Palestine.

Issued just months before Hitlers war was launched, the White Paper cut off European Jewry from the only place in the world to which they could flee. Other countries wouldnt shelter them much less welcome them. In the ensuing world war, the Jews were trapped in a continental slaughterhouse, which the Wannsee Conference had made far more efficient.

After Germanys defeat, the Allies created the United Nations, which did nothing to help Jewish survivors to reach Palestine from their squalid refugee camps in Europe. There was no call to Britain to lift the White Papers limits on immigration to Palestine, where a civil war erupted between Jews and Arabs with each also attacking the British.

Britain, exhausted by World War II, announced in early 1947 that it was relinquishing its UN Mandate for Palestine. Thus, the 1947 UN vote to partition Palestine was just an empty gesture: The only thing clear was that some kind of division of Palestine was certain once the British withdrew.

Most agreed that declaring a Jewish state would create yet another bloodbath for the Jews, who were then a distinct minority in greater Palestine, and were vastly outnumbered by the surrounding Arab nations, all of whom pledged the eradication of the Zionist presence.

Caring more about relations with Arab nations than the survivors of the Holocaust, the Allies all imposed arms embargoes against the Jews of Palestine. The partition plan did nothing to protect a Jewish state in Palestine, and those who ratified it cared not a whit about the survival of the Jewish community.

The State of Israel was declared on May 14, 1948, moments after the last British troops left. The UN resolution hadnt called for Jewish statehood, and many foreign politicians thought it was unwise, including the American Secretary of State, George Marshall.

The European powers, the United States and the United Nations prepared to watch a continuation of the Holocaust as Israel was swarmed by Arab armies.

Israel survived and has flourishedv because of the incredible commitment, leadership and courage of its own population (then just a few hundred thousand), facing millions of Arabs and five invading armies.

In fact, there was no inevitability of Israel resulting from the Wannsee Conference in 1942. And no toothless UN General Assembly Resolution birthed Israel in 1947.

The courageous leaders and people of Israel created and fought at a huge cost of blood and treasure to create the State of Israel in 1948.

Follow this link:

Jews (not the Shoah, not the UN) created Israel - The Jewish Star

Now Is the Time! ArtScroll’s 30%-Off Talmud and Mishnah Sale – VINnews

Posted By on February 11, 2022

Are you missing volumes in your Mishnah or Talmud sets and want to fill them in? Have you ever considered donating a full set of Mishnah or Gemara to your shul, in memory of a beloved family member? And -most exciting of all have you ever dreamed about owning the full set of the Schottenstein Edition Talmud for your own learning or giving one to your children or parents?

Now is the time!

From now until February 21, take 30% off all ArtScroll Talmud and Mishnah sets and individual volumes.

The Schottenstein Edition Talmud Bavli: With its flowing translation, clear elucidation, plus diagrams, vowelized text, and introductions to the masechtos and individual topics, the Schottenstein Edition Talmud Bavli has transformed the lives of tens of thousands of people who make Talmud study a vital part of their day. Now you can purchase the full 73-volume set at a super-special price, and save over $900!

Schottenstein Edition Hebrew Talmud Bavli: Designed for those who prefer to study in Hebrew, this edition has achieved wide acceptance and acclaim. In Israel and America, the Blue Gemara is everywhere. Again, you save over $900 on the full set.

Schottenstein Talmud Yerushalmi in Hebrew or English: More and more people are broadening their Talmudic knowledge by learning the Yerushalmi in this edition, which follows the successful format of the Schottenstein Edition Talmud Bavli.

The Schottenstein Edition Mishnah Elucidated: Featuring a flowing translation and concise elucidation in the format of the Schottenstein Talmud, this edition is perfect for yahrzeits and sheloshim, for beginners, students, and anyone seeking a clear, basic understanding of the Mishnah. It also includes in-depth notes for a deeper understanding, as well as the commentary of Rabbi Ovadiah Bartenura.

The Ryzman Edition Hebrew Mishnah: A multilevel Hebrew-language elucidation of Mishnah, enabling readers to learn at the level of their choice. Each volume contains the full text of the Mishnah, the commentary of Rabbi Ovadia Bartenura, a phrase-by-phrase translation and elucidation in readable Hebrew, as well as expanded explanations of the Mishnah for a greater understanding of the pshat.

ArtScroll Mishnah with the Yad Avraham Commentary: A major series that includes clear translation, diagrams and illustrations, and the Yad Avraham commentary covering a broad range of commentators, this is an important part of every Torah library.

ArtScroll Edition of Tosafos

The learning revolution that began with the Schottenstein Edition Talmud continues with the ArtScroll Edition of Tosafos. This extraordinary elucidation offers a path to understanding this vital yet difficult commentary, changing Gemara learning.

Schottenstein Edition Ein Yaakov

This series provides an in-depth understanding of the Aggadic sections of the Talmud, with fascinating Torah thoughts, lessons and principles, bringing new life to the study of Aggadah.

Hurry and take advantage of these incredible savings!

Follow ArtScroll on WhatsApp for a chance to win a Pre-Loaded ArtScroll Digital Library Ipad! Click here to enter!

More here:

Now Is the Time! ArtScroll's 30%-Off Talmud and Mishnah Sale - VINnews

Rabbinic Rabies and Rabid Rabbis the ‘Mad Dog’ in Talmudic Texts – The Media Line

Posted By on February 11, 2022

Wed, 9 Feb 2022 18:00 - 19:00 Greenwich Mean Time (UTC0)

Register here.

Ancient rabbinic advice about mad dogs

About this event

This lecture will discuss some significant passages from the early (Mishnah/Tosefta) and late (Palestinian/Babylonian Talmud) rabbinic traditions of late antiquity that deal with so-called mad dogs (kelev shote). The texts introduce different classifications or taxonomies of this condition and elaborate on theoretical and practical knowledge about appropriate cures and remedies. These therapeutic advices, embedded in a religious-normative discourse, contain unexpected and sometimes puzzling details and terminology. Moreover, they display conceptual structures and literary techniques that point to a certain familiarity with technical or epistemic genres (e.g., recipes, diagnosis, incantations), while deploying also traditional rabbinic discursive forms.

The regionally diverse Talmudic texts from Palestine and Babylonia seem to reflect different assumptions and medical approaches of their surrounding cultures. The analysis will shed some light on possible interactions with and transfers of medical and cultural concepts from ancient Graeco-Roman, Byzantine-Christian, Mesopotamian, and Persian-Zoroastrian traditions. Moreover, the discussion will provide some keys to the specific ways in which the rabbis adopted, integrated and authorized such knowledge.

The speaker is Lennart Lehmhaus (PhD), lecturer at the Institute for Jewish Studies at the University of Tbingen (Germany). Before that he held positions as research fellow and lecturer at Martin-Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg (Germany), Freie Universitt Berlin (as a member of the research center SFB 980 Episteme in Motion), The Katz Center for Judaic Studies- University of Pennsylvania, and Harvard University. His research and teaching interests comprise ancient Jewish cultures and literatures, specifically rabbinic and Talmudic; premodern knowledge and sciences; trajectories of Jewish traditions, motifs and customs into contemporary Jewish and Israeli culture.

He has published widely on the so-called late Midrash texts in their early Islamicate contexts. His monograph on discursive features and cultural backgrounds of the ethical work Seder Eliyahu Zuta is currently in press and will be published in the Text and Studies in Ancient Judaism series with Mohr Siebeck.

In his current research, Lehmhaus works on Talmudic discourse on medical knowledge and practice in comparison to Graeco-Roman and Ancient Near Eastern medical traditions. As publications from this project will emerge the Sourcebooks of Medical Knowledge in Talmudic Literature (Mohr Siebeck, 202225) and Talmudic Bodies of Knowledge Jewish Discourse on Health, Illness, and Medicine in Late Antiquity (forthcoming 2023).

Besides several peer-reviewed articles, he has edited the volumes: Collecting Recipes. Byzantine and Jewish Pharmacology in Dialogue. De Gruyter, 2017 (with M. Martelli), Defining Jewish Medicine Transfers of Medical Knowledge in Jewish Cultures and Traditions. (Harrassowitz, 2021), and Female Bodies and Female Practitioners in Ancient Mediterranean Cultures (Mohr Siebeck, 2022).

Lehmhaus is the founding editor of the series ASK Ancient Cultures of Sciences and Knowledge (Mohr Siebeck, 2022-).

Read the original here:

Rabbinic Rabies and Rabid Rabbis the 'Mad Dog' in Talmudic Texts - The Media Line


Page 489«..1020..488489490491..500510..»

matomo tracker