Page 505«..1020..504505506507..510520..»

Survey reveals about one-third of North American students feel the Holocaust was fabricated or exaggerated – CTV News Atlantic

Posted By on January 30, 2022

David Korn understands the horrors of the Holocaust. He survived. His parents did not.

They were taken to Auschwitz. Both of them, he said.

Abraham and Miriam Korn were two of nearly six million Jewish people murdered by the Nazis.

Before his parents were deported from Czechoslovakia (now Slovakia), he and his brother were brought to an orphanage where they were kept hidden and protected under the care of Pastor Vladimir Kuna.

There were 70 kids in the orphanage and 26 were Jewish. He took very big risk of himself, Korn said.

Korn's aunt and uncle survived and eventually returned to reunite with him and his brothers. They moved to Israel after first going to France. Eventually, Korn came to Canada to work as an engineer.

Somebody was keeping me safe so I would be able to tell the story to other people, he said.

His story is one of three experiences shared in a new book called At Great Risk: Memoirs of Rescue During the Holocaust.

And its release is well-timed.

Anew survey, which was commissioned by Canadian charity Liberation75, shows that almost 3,600 North American students revealed gaps in Holocaust education, finding that social media is a significant source of information for somestudents.

We shouldn't be surprised by the outcome. We are but we shouldnt be because theres no mandated holocaust education within the curriculum anywhere in Canada, said Marilyn Sinclair, of Liberation75.

For the study, students in Grades 6 through 12 were surveyed both before and after a two-day virtual conference focusing on the Holocaust. Almost 80 per cent of the students were in Canada, while the rest were in U.S. classrooms.

Just over six per cent identified as Jewish.

Results showed 33 per cent of the students surveyed either don't know what to think about the Holocaust, think the number of Jews who died has been exaggerated, or question whether the Holocaust even happened. The survey also found 40 per cent of students got their information on social media.

So, of course theyre getting misinformation, disinformation, fake news. So, we shouldnt be surprised that they dont know as much about the Holocaust as they should, or that what they know is often false, Sinclair said.

Retired Halifax Regional Municipality councillor and teacher, Bob Harvey, says he did teach the Holocaust when he taught students about Second World War history, but that was 25 years ago.

History is no longer compulsory in the selection of subjects. Back in the 1970s, history was compulsory and everybody took it in (Grade) 10, 11 and 12, said Harvey.

Harvey believes history must be told so it doesnt repeat itself.

The Atlantic Jewish Council agrees.

And thats not just true for the Holocaust, Arik Drucker said, the president of Atlantic Jewish Council. The Rwanda genocide is very recent, thats within our lifetime, so its important for our young kids to understand these events. Theyre real.

The Atlantic Jewish Council is encourages any educators who wish to learn more about curriculum to help teach the Holocaust to contact them.

See more here:

Survey reveals about one-third of North American students feel the Holocaust was fabricated or exaggerated - CTV News Atlantic

How three-quarters of French Jews survived the Holocaust, despite the Vichy regime – FRANCE 24 English

Posted By on January 30, 2022

The fate of Frances Jews during World War II has become an unlikely topic of debate in the run-up to the French presidential election, exhumed by a revisionist candidates widely debunked claims that the Nazi-allied Vichy regime offered them protection. FRANCE 24 spoke to historian Jacques Smelin, whose latest book sheds light on the real reasons some 200,000 French Jews survived the Holocaust.

Smelins quest began more than a decade ago, following an interview with the late Simone Veil, the revered politician and Holocaust survivor who was recently inducted into the Panthon of French heroes. During their conversation, back in 2008, Smelin found he could offer no easy answer to the following question: How is it that so many Jews were able to survive in spite of the Vichy government and the Nazis?

Of the roughly 320,000 Jews established in France at the start of the war, an estimated 74,150 most of them foreign nationals were deported by Nazi Germany with the complicity of its allies in the Vichy regime, according to data compiled by the renowned French historian and Nazi hunter Serge Klarsfeld. The figures translate into a survival rate of 75 percent, one of the highest in Nazi-dominated Europe, well above the 25 percent documented for the Netherlands or neighbouring Belgiums 45 percent.

Understanding this French exception is the focus of Smelins recent book, "Une nigme franaise, pourquoi les trois quarts des juifs en France nont pas t dports" (A French enigma, why three-quarters of Jews in France were not deported), based on 10 years of painstaking research on the fate of Western Europes largest Jewish community at the time.

Since 1995, when President Jacques Chirac acknowledged the French state's role in rounding up Jews and handing them over to their executioners, few have challenged the notion that the Vichy regime led by Marshal Philippe Ptain colluded in the arrest, deportation and mass murder of Jews. However, some revisionists continue to minimise the regimes guilt, claiming it sought to protect Jews who were French nationals.

Contrary to the claims made byric Zemmour, a far-right candidate for the French presidency, French Jews who managed to avoid wartime deportation do not owe their survival to Ptains regime, says Smelin.

Such claims are nonsense. There is absolutely no archival evidence to back them up, says the historian, whose book recalls Vichy Frances own antisemitic laws, enacted independently of Nazi Germany, as well as the active role of French police in the arrests and round-ups that preceded deportations. He adds: Zemmour is simply playing on peoples ignorance of the matter.

Macron visits Vichy as revisionist history enters presidential race

To understand why a majority of Frances Jews were not deported during the Holocaust, Smelin combined archival research with witness accounts of wartime France. These included extensive interviews with Jews who were able to avoid deportation, many of whom were either ignored after the war or reluctant to share their personal stories.

There is a sense of guilt among survivors. At first, a lot of them told me they had nothing to say. But when we sat down for a chat, tongues would loosen and their stories eventually unspooled, says Smelin. My aim was to restore the voices of Jews who were persecuted in France by the laws of the Vichy regime. They experienced anguish, separation and displacement. They also suffered.

The first and most obvious escape route for Jews was to cross into the so-called zone libre (free zone), the southeastern part of the country, covering roughly two-fifths of the entire French territory, that was controlled by Vichy but not occupied by the Nazis at least not until November 1942. There, many Jews were able to hide in remote corners of what was still a predominantly rural country.

Two-thirds of Frances Jews fled to the zone libre and scattered across the territory, says Smelin. Stressing that those who spoke French and were better off financially had the best chance of hiding. Still, as late as the spring of 1944, some 40,000 Jews continued to live in Paris, according to the historian, whereas the Jewish communities of Warsaw or Amsterdam had by then been practically wiped out.

Smelin says French Jews best ally during the war was the web of social relationships which they were very much part of. French Jews were highly integrated and had friends, neighbours and colleagues they could call upon. Without minimising wartime collaboration with the Nazis, Smelin rejects the notion of a profoundly antisemitic French public. He cites the more than 4,000 French citizens recognised by Israel as Righteous Among the Nations for their role in saving Jews from deportation. He also points to the multiple round-ups of Jews, including the infamous Vel dHiv round-up of July 1942, which fell short of Nazi targets.

>>Macron restates Frances responsibility for wartime round-up of Jews

When the Vel dHiv round-up took place, something unexpected happened, he explains. The Nazis and their Vichy allies were counting on the arrest of 27,000 Jews, mostly foreigners. In the end, they had to settle for 13,000 though obviously it was still 13,000 too many. More than half the targeted Jews were able to avoid arrest, largely because their fellow Parisians gave them advance warning and helped them to hide. Smelin adds: A large part of the public was outraged that police were going after women and children.

With the unprecedented mass arrest of Jewish women and children, the Vel dHiv round-up marked a turning point in France, exposing in part the sinister motives of the Nazis. It triggered the secretive establishment of rescue networks across the country, including by Catholic and Protestant clergy. Some prominent figures publicly spoke out against the treatment of Jews, including the archbishop of Toulouse, Monsignor Salige, who urged worshipers to respect human dignity in a sermon delivered on August 23, 1942.

Children, women, men, fathers and mothers being treated like a lowly herd; members of a single family being separated from each other and carted away to an unknown destination it is our age which was destined to see this dreadful sight, the archbishop said. Jews are men and women. Foreigners are men and women. One may not do anything one wishes to these men, to these women, to these fathers and mothers. They are part of the human race; they are our brothers, like so many others.

The sermon, which was carried by the BBC and the New York Times, had a considerable impact on the public, says Smelin, who ranks himself among those who believe Monsignor Salige has not been given the recognition he deserves. His words still resonate.

Fourteen years on from his conversation with Veil, Smelin has come up with a detailed, 224-page answer to her question. Establishing historical facts is also the best answer to those who attempt to fabricate history, he says, referring to Zemmours claims. His book helps clarify why a much higher proportion of Frances Jews survived the Holocaust than in other Nazi-occupied countries. It does so without forgetting the 74,150 Jewish men, women and children who were deported from France most of whom perished.

This article was adapted from the original in French.

See the article here:

How three-quarters of French Jews survived the Holocaust, despite the Vichy regime - FRANCE 24 English

Cincinnati Holocaust & Humanity Center to revamp Institute on Teaching The Holocaust – ideastream

Posted By on January 30, 2022

The Holocaust & Humanity Center in Cincinnati is revamping its Institute on Teaching The Holocaust to aid educators to teach the subject more effectively.

The Institute on Teaching The Holocaust has been going for almost 30 years. The five-day program aims to provide teachers with methods to connect the teachings of the Holocaust to the modern day. Education Outreach Manager Lauren Karas says the Institute not only aids teachers, but students too, in the long run.

"Students who are exposed to high quality Holocaust education come away with more critical thinking skills, higher critical thinking skills because the Holocaust demands that you think critically about human behavior and the choices people made," Karas said.

The program aims to individualize the history of the Holocaust by incorporating testimonies of local survivors and will explore curricular strategies for both ELA and social studies classrooms to connects historical content with literacy skills.

It will take place in June and will be in-person. Educators can register for the event through the Holocaust & Humanity Center's website. The program costs $100.

Thursday was International Holocaust Remembrance Day, a day which people around the world are encouraged to remember the six million Jewish victims of the Holocaust and other victims of Nazism. The day is also used to promote education. HHC's Director of Education and Engagement Jodi Elowitz says learning about the Holocaust should remind people to reflect on the world they live in today.

"How can we prevent future mass atrocities, future genocides? By raising awareness of the Holocaust, you are raising awareness of all these other crimes against humanity," Elowitz said.

Read more:

Cincinnati Holocaust & Humanity Center to revamp Institute on Teaching The Holocaust - ideastream

U of A Displays Pen Used to Sign Holocaust Education Legislation – University of Arkansas Newswire

Posted By on January 30, 2022

Photo by Chieko Hara/University Relations

L to R: Barry Brown, Toby Klein, Laura Jacobs, Adrain Smith

The U of A held a small ceremony and provided accompanying programming on International Holocaust Rememberance Day to recognize a bill, the volunteers who championed it and the universitys support by displaying the pen that was used to sign the important piece of state legislation into law that requires Arkansas schools to educate students about the Holocaust.

The gift of the pen used to sign Bill 160 into law was made to the U of A by a volunteer committee with representatives including renowned Holocaust survivor and regular U of A program presenter Pieter Kohnstam and U of A Professor Emeritus Barry Brown, among others. TheHolocaust Education Living Proposal (H.E.L.P.)committee, comprising volunteers who support enriching the K-12 curriculum with Holocaust education, received the pen used to sign the legislation into law from Sen. Bart Hester (R-Cave Springs), who co-sponsored the bill.

Last April, Gov. Asa Hutchinson signed the bill that was passed unanimously in the Arkansas House of Representatives and the Arkansas Senate requiring schools in grades 5-12 to generate an understanding about the causes and effects of the horrific event, and develop dialogue about the ramifications of bigotry, stereotyping and discrimination. The university wrote a letter to support the legislation and will display a framed version of the legislation along with the pen and a photograph of the governors, along with Hester and Rep. DeAnn Vaught (Horatio) and committee members David Ronnel and his father, Steve Ronnel. The display will be housed in the Multicultural Center as part of an expansion of cultural programming.

We appreciate that the HELP committee sought to find a home for this object on our campus, so that it could be displayed to commemorate the importance of Holocaust education and its beneficial effects on Arkansans, said Charles Robinson, interim chancellor. Its worth noting that Arkansas has become one of but a few states to require Holocaust education in its public schools, and we have faith that this addition will help future University of Arkansas students in their personal compassion, growth and development as citizens.

Since 2005, the United Nations and its member states have held commemoration ceremonies to mark the anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz-Birkenau and to honor the 6 million Jewish victims of the Holocaust and millions of other victims of Nazism.

About the University of Arkansas:As Arkansas' flagship institution, the U of A provides an internationally competitive education in more than 200 academic programs. Founded in 1871, the U of A contributes more than$2.2 billion to Arkansas economythrough the teaching of new knowledge and skills, entrepreneurship and job development, discovery through research and creative activity while also providing training for professional disciplines. The Carnegie Foundation classifies the U of A among the top 3% of U.S. colleges and universities with the highest level of research activity.U.S. News & World Reportranks the U of A among the top public universities in the nation. See how the U of A works to build a better world atArkansas Research News.

Read the original post:

U of A Displays Pen Used to Sign Holocaust Education Legislation - University of Arkansas Newswire

The week in TV: The Responder; Trigger Point; The Gilded Age; Survivors: Portraits of the Holocaust – The Guardian

Posted By on January 30, 2022

The Responder (BBC One) | iPlayerTrigger Point (ITV) | ITV HubThe Gilded Age (Sky Atlantic)Survivors: Portraits of the Holocaust (BBC Two) | IPlayer

I was rather taken aback by BBC Ones The Responder: by how good it is, how unsettling and vivid. It looks like a bog-standard edgy five-part police drama (all episodes are on iPlayer), this time set in Liverpool: the fraught corrupt cop with the marriage on the rocks; the seedy underworld; drug deals going wrong; threats; eruptions of violence The Responder has all of this, but much more besides. It is television police drama refashioned as a long, dark night of the soul.

Martin Freeman plays the titular responder (officer who responds to 999 calls), who feels hes disappearing. At first, hearing his Liverpudlian accent, you think: is this a Stephen Graham impersonation how long before it turns into a tongue-chewing mess? But it doesnt, and the effect is transformative Freeman is a different actor almost but thats not all. He gives a first-rate performance: whether being pulled into the criminality, working nights dealing with societys outcasts or offloading to his inevitable counsellor (practically TV law since The Sopranos), hes believable all the way, exposing layer after layer of melancholy, humour, fortitude, weakness, existential dread and pain.

Directed by Philip Barantini (Boiling Point), who also appears as an abusive boyfriend, and Tim Mielants (The Terror), The Responder is the first TV series written by author Tony Schumacher, who himself worked in Liverpool as a responder. This enriches the drama: theres a realistic, often humorous bounce to the dialogue, a sense of speaking human. There are also fantastic performances: Ian Hart (sporting a truly terrible Harry Enfield-style scousers wig) is alternately menacing and mischievous as a drug dealer; Rita Tushingham is heartbreaking as a dying mother; Adelayo Adedayo burns through scenes as an initially judgmental rookie cop; Emily Fairn (well, hello, Juno Temple meets Andrea Riseborough) portrays a drug addict who hallelujah! isnt just plonked there to be stereotypically doomed and pathetic.

Negatives? The Responder is overlong and at times repetitive, the ending is mangled, and some of the night-time filming is so murky, it feels like being slowly lowered into a well. For all that, this is a defiantly anti-formulaic poem to redemption: original and unmissable.

As for formulaic, there was the first episode of ITVs new six-part bomb disposal series, Trigger Point. Created by Daniel Brierley, directed by Gilles Bannier, its from the same production stable as Line of Duty, and slap me to my senses Id really been looking forward to it as a 21st-century answer to the late-70s toff-officers-and-bombs classic Danger UXB. It stars Vicky McClure as Lana, an explosives disposal (Expo) officer working alongside Joel, played by Adrian Lester, though (cue doomy spoiler hashtag!) #NotForLong. As soon as Joel starts fondly speaking of getting back with his ex, the clock is ticking on his chances of survival. Hes too lovely. Lana likes him so much. Also, Lester is a big name: sorry, mate, youre toast.

McClure and Lester are both excellent actors who could breathe naturalistic majesty into the instructions for a microwave meal. But even they struggled leading a soapy opener that was a tad heavy on jargon (trigger phones, jammers, lucky pairs of snips) and light on plot, characterisation and, for that matter, reality. Entering a council estate flat that is considered a bomb factory, would Lana, a seasoned professional, really have reached straight for the light switch? Spying an unattended van, would Joel, another expert, have nonchalantly strolled towards it?

On the plus side, there was a visceral scene involving a suicide jacket, and an explosion was rendered as a beautifully macabre symphony of ash, fire and pebbles. I hope theres more of this and less of the sense of an issue-box-ticking school play.

Over to Sky Atlantics nine-part The Gilded Age to see Downton Abbey creator Julian Fellowess narrative logic (I mean, everybody enjoys olden days posh people sneering at commoners, right?) applied to late-19th-century New York.

Left penniless by her fathers death, Marian (Louisa Jacobson) arrives in New York circa 1882 to live with her aunts: Christine Baranski in the Maggie Smith-patented ultra-snob role (You belong to old New York), and Cynthia Nixon, who does little more than simper lethargically and sew samplers. Elsewhere, a black (coloured) character (Dene Benton) yearns to be a writer, and an arriviste railway tycoon couple, the Russells (Carrie Coon and Morgan Spector), are viciously humiliated as they try to enter elite New York circles.

The first episode is a clunker, though perhaps I was just imagining FOB (Fear of Bridgerton) ominously haunting every scene like an oversexed ratings-busting Netflix spectre. Peeking ahead, The Gilded Age, directed by Michael Engler, manages to be simultaneously too Downton (theres an unsuitable lawyer love interest again) and not Downton enough: the usually magnificent Baranski is too limp to be the American Violet Crawley, and the servants are so underdrawn that, a few episodes in, I was wondering whether I should ring a little bell to find out who they were. Keep watching, though: the Russells, far from being victims, turn out to be new money brutalists who dont take the snubs lying down.

On BBC Two, the gently paced but fiercely moving documentary Survivors: Portraits of the Holocaust, directed by Suniti Somaiya, focused on the 2020 project, commissioned by the Prince of Wales, in which seven artists painted seven Holocaust survivors for an exhibition in the Queens Gallery, Buckingham Palace, ultimately destined for the Royal Collection.

The artists, including Clara Drummond and Jenny Saville, were clearly moved to be involved, but it was the survivors, all children at the time, and their testimonies that compelled. Anita Lasker-Wallfisch went to Auschwitz fully expecting to be gassed she survived by playing the cello in the womens orchestra there while Zigi Shipper initially thought the chimneys signified bakeries. Shipper and another sitter, Manfred Goldberg, knew each other from the camps, and took pleasure in their lifelong friendship. Together, they noted that even they, child survivors, were now dwindling in number. In keeping with the art project, this documentary came to be about bearing witness, remembrance, the solemn magnitude of it all.

And Just Like That (Sky Comedy) The Sex and the City follow-up has vastly improved since the series premiere disaster-fest, where panicked uber-wokeness sucked all hope into a black hole of cringe. Now, themes (love, grief, ageing) are dealt with much more sagely.

I, Sniper: The Washington Killers (Channel 4) A docuseries about the 2002 Washington sniper case in which 17 victims were randomly killed by a teenager and an army veteran (since executed). The teenage sniper, Lee Boyd Malvo, now in his 30s, speaks from prison.

Jay Blades: Learning to Read at 51(BBC One) The Repair Shop presenter grew up struggling with illiteracy and was only diagnosed with dyslexia as an adult. This lovely one-off documentary shows Blades determined to read a story to his daughter before she turns 16.

More here:

The week in TV: The Responder; Trigger Point; The Gilded Age; Survivors: Portraits of the Holocaust - The Guardian

History of the Jews in Atlanta – Wikipedia

Posted By on January 30, 2022

The history of the Jews in Atlanta began in the early years of the city's settlement, and the Jewish community continues to grow today. In its early decades, the Jewish community was largely made up of German Jewish immigrants who quickly assimilated and were active in broader Atlanta society. As with the rest of Atlanta, the Jewish community was affected greatly by the American Civil War. In the late 19th century, a wave of Jewish migration from Eastern Europe brought less wealthy, Yiddish speaking Jews to the area, in stark contrast to the established Jewish community. The community was deeply impacted by the Leo Frank case in 19131915, which caused many to re-evaluate what it meant to be Jewish in Atlanta and the South, and largely scarred the generation of Jews in the city who lived through it. In 1958, one of the centers of Jewish life in the city, the Hebrew Benevolent Congregation, known as "The Temple" was bombed over its rabbi's support for the Civil Rights Movement. Unlike decades prior when Leo Frank was lynched, the bombing spurred an outpouring of support from the broader Atlanta community. In the last few decades, the community has steadily become one of the ten largest in the United States. As its population has risen, it has also become the Southern location of many national Jewish organizations, and today there are a multitude of Jewish institutions. The greater Atlanta area is considered to be home to the country's ninth largest Jewish population.[1]

First founded as Marthasville in 1843, Atlanta changed its name in 1845, and that same year the first Jews settled there.[2] The first two known Jewish settlers, Jacob Haas and Henry Levi, opened a store together in 1846.[1] By 1850, 10% of Atlanta stores were run by Jews, who only made up 1% of the population[3] and largely worked in retail, especially in the sale of clothing and dry goods. Many early Jewish settlers, however, did not end up settling permanently in Atlanta, and turnover in the community was high.[2]

In the 1850s, due to the transient nature of much of the Jewish community, there were no consistent religious services and no formally organized community.[2] That changed in 1860s, after the founding of the Hebrew Benevolent Society, started as a burial society, which lead to the creation of the Hebrew Benevolent Congregation in 1867. Early members of the society secured the first Jewish plots in the famous Oakland Cemetery, in its original six acres.[4][5] The congregation, which came to be known as The Temple, has been an important focal point of Atlanta Jewish life since its synagogue was dedicated in 1877.[1]

During the Civil War, the Jewish community in the city were not all on the same side of the conflict. When the war was over and the city was left to rebuild after it had largely been burnt down when General Sherman and his troops approached the city, Jews played a larger role than before in the city's public sphere and its society. As the city became the center of the New South, its economy rapidly expanded, enticing a number of Jews to move to the city. According to one figure, in 1880, 71% of Jewish adult males in Atlanta worked in commercial trade, and 60% were either business owners or managers.[2] The community was also very present in politics two Jews from the Atlanta area were elected to the state legislature in the late 1860s and early 1870s, and in 1875 Aaron Haas was the city's mayor pro tem. Additionally, David Mayer helped found the Georgia Board of Education and served on it for a decade until his death in 1890.[1]

Beginning in 1881, Atlanta received a portion of the influx of Jews immigrating to the U.S. from Eastern Europe, especially the Russian Empire. While the existing Atlanta Jewish community was largely assimilated, generally wealthy, and of liberal German Jewish backgrounds, the new immigrants were of a different background. They were largely poor, spoke Yiddish, shunned the Reform Judaism of The Temple, and held Orthodox views. By the early 20th century, these more recent immigrants outnumbered the German Jewish community of The Temple. In 1887, Congregation Ahavath Achim was founded to fit this new portion of the community, and in 1901 their synagogue was built in the middle of the south side area where most Yiddish Jews lived.[2]

In this period, multiple synagogues opened only to rejoin Ahavath Achim or The Temple in the following years or next decades. In 1902, Congregation Shearith Israel, which did not flame out like other contemporary congregations, was formed by a group of Ahavath Achim members who were discontent with the level of stringency of observance there. In 1910, Shearith Israel hired Rabbi Tobias Geffen to head their synagogue, who would go on to have a large impact on the Atlanta Jewish community as well as Orthodox communities throughout the South.[2]

In the early 20th century, about 150 Sephardi Jews immigrated to the city, many of whom came from Turkey and Rhodes. A group in the Sephardi community founded their own synagogue, Ahavat Shalom, in 1910. In 1912, some Turkish Sephardi Jews broke off from the congregation and founded their own, Or Hahyim. Two years later, both congregations merged and became Or Ve Shalom, and their first synagogue building was dedicated in 1920.[2][6]

In 1913, a small number of Hasidic Jews also founded their own synagogue, Anshi Sfard.[6]

The divisions between Yiddish speaking Jews and Jews of German backgrounds extended beyond the synagogues as well, and in many ways it was as though there were two separate Jewish communities. The perception of the German Jewish community was that the Yiddish Jews were of a lower class, possibly a threat to the carefully cultivated image of the Jewish community in the city, and needed to assimilate but also be kept separate. This dynamic also visible in the realm of Jewish communal organizations. German Jewish organizations such as the Hebrew Relief Society and the Hebrew Ladies Benevolent Society helped the poor in the community. Sometimes, however, attempts by the German Jewish community to aid the less well off Yiddish speaking community were perceived by the latter as patronizing or offensive. In one such instance, the local Jewish paper remarked, "we want to make good American citizens out of our Russian brothers" and called the Yiddish speaking immigrants "ignorant." When wealthy German Jews organized the Standard Club and purchased a mansion for its clubhouse in 1905, Yiddish Jews were pretty much entirely excluded. In 1913, Yiddish Jews founded the Progressive Club. It was not until the Great Depression that the Standard Club stopped discriminating on this basis, and by and large, it was not until World War II that the barriers between German and Yiddish Jews fell.[2]

The Jewish Education Organization (JEA) is an example of cooperation between both groups of Jews. The result of merging a Russian immigrant organization and a German Jewish one, it had the goal of encouraging Americanization of immigrants; and hosted training classes and Hebrew instruction, served as a meeting place for Jewish clubs and organizations, and had recreation. The JEA facility was completed in 1911 and surplus funds were used to start a free health clinic in the building. Located in the center of Jewish Atlanta, through its variety of programs it served as both a community center and immigrant help center. It became a focal point for the Jewish community and during one month in 1914, more than 14,000 people attended programs there.[2]

Other contemporary organizations included the Federation of Jewish Charities (est. 1905), later reorganized as the Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta, and the Hebrew Orphans' Home (est. 1889). The Federation was (and remains) the umbrella organization for funding the community's institutions and charitable programs, while the Hebrew Orphans' Home served nearly 400 children in the first 25 years, later transitioning toward aiding foster care and supporting widows, and ultimately closing in 1930.[2]

Leo Frank was born in Texas, raised in New York, and moved to Atlanta to work at his uncle's pencil factory. He was active in the Atlanta Jewish community after his arrival, marrying Lucille Selig, of a prominent Atlanta Jewish family, and being elected head of the city's Bnai Brith chapter. In 1913, 13-year-old pencil factory employee Mary Phagan, from Marietta was found murdered in the basement of the factory building. The case quickly became a major story in Atlanta, and the death brought tensions about child labor and the grievances of the rural working class to the fore, increasing pressure for someone to be held responsible. Over the course of the investigation, multiple suspects were arrested and released before police came to believe that Frank was likely the killer. The trial that followed sparked anti-Semitic fervor, and changed the outlook of the Atlanta Jewish community.[7]

The main witness for the prosecution, James "Jim" Conley, was a black janitor who worked in the factory. Conley changed his story a number of times throughout the investigation and trial, but did not crack while being cross examined on the stand and was key in the trial's outcome. Most historians today believe that Conley was the killer, and he was a primary suspect before Frank.[8][7] As to the atmosphere that led to Frank's prosecution, historian Nancy MacLean said it "[could] be explained only in light of the social tensions unleashed by the growth of industry and cities in the turn-of-the-century South. These circumstances made a Jewish employer a more fitting scapegoat for disgruntled whites than the other leading suspect in the case, a black worker."[9] Meanwhile, Frank's trial received full coverage in Atlanta's three competing newspapers, and public outrage only continued to grow over the murder. Throughout the trial and in the media, Frank was painted as the antagonist of all that was good and Southern an industrialist, a Northern Yankee, and a Jew.

In August 1913, after a short deliberation, the jury convicted Frank and he was sentenced to death. A large mob assembled outside the courthouse rejoiced at the news. The case was then appealed by his lawyers at every level, and it was during this time that Frank's plight became national news and galvanized the Jewish community across the country. Adolph Ochs, publisher of The New York Times took up Frank's cause and launched what has been called a "journalistic crusade" in the paper. In addition, the head of the American Jewish Committee, Louis Marshall, threw his and the organization's weight behind the issue. This, however, fanned flames further for those in the South who already viewed Frank as a symbol of Northern and Jewish wealth and elitism.[8] Populist politician Thomas E. Watson took to railing against Frank in his publications, The Jeffersonian and Watson's Magazine, often in racialized terms, and pronouncing his guilt and calling for his death. Frank's case went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, where the appeal was denied a final time.[2] The focus then largely shifted onto progressive and popular Georgia Governor John Slaton, then in his last days in office, to commute the death sentence. Slaton found himself under immense pressure from those on both sides, and personally reviewed 10,000 pages of documents and revisited the factory where the murder occurred.[7]

On June 21, 1915, Governor Slaton commuted Frank's sentence to life in prison. Much of the state, and Atlanta in particular, was outraged. A mob that formed with the aim of attacking the governor's home had to be stopped by the Georgia National Guard.[7]

After being commuted, Frank was transferred to the prison in Milledgeville, over 100 miles from Marietta, Phagan's hometown. A month later, another inmate tried to kill Frank by slashing his throat, an attempt on his life which he survived.[10]

On August 16, 1915, a group of prominent Marietta and Georgia citizens calling themselves the "Knights of Mary Phagan", including a former Georgia governor, former and current Marietta mayors, and current and former sheriffs, abducted Frank from prison and drove him back to Marietta. There, they hung him not far from the Phagan house, where his body remained for hours as an energized crowd gathered.[10]

In the months following the lynching, some of the Knights of Mary Phagan also helped to revive the Ku Klux Klan atop Stone Mountain. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL)s creation in 1913 was also spurred by the Frank trial.[11] The case has been called the "American Dreyfus affair", as both centered around falsely accused wealthy assimilated Jewish men whose trials, based on minimal evidence, were the catalysts of anti-Semitic fervor in the masses which then led to their convictions.[12]

Leo Frank's lynching had a massive impact on the Atlanta Jewish community, and in many ways still does today. The episode was also widely felt in Jewish communities across the United States, and even more so in the South. Prior to his case, many Atlanta Jews of a wealthier, German background felt fully established and accepted in the city. They were assimilated and considered themselves Southern, and what happened to Frank was a scary awakening that in the broader society's eyes, they may always be considered Jews first.[1] Leo and his wife Lucille were members of The Temple and its community, and Lucille, to the shock of many, remained in Atlanta the rest of her life. The consensus of the community following Frank's death was not to mention it, and the subject remained taboo for many decades.[10]

Even over 100 years later, the subject remains a touchy one for some, and how important what happened to Leo Frank is in the broader history of the Jewish community in Atlanta is still an open question. There are many who see it a blip in the distinguished history of the community, and prefer to think of it as an anomaly with little bearing on the whole. Others in the community assign more lasting importance to what happened, and continue to call for political action to absolve and remember Frank, who in 1986 received a posthumous pardon based on the state's culpability in his death, rather than his innocence.[10]

Some Jews left Atlanta in the aftermath of Leo Frank's trial and lynching, but the number is unknown.[1] The community also largely withdrew from politics after the episode, and for well over a decade, no Atlanta Jews ran for public office. Nevertheless, the Jewish population continued to grow in the decades following, going from 4,000 in 1910 to 12,000 in 1937, and accounting for a third of the city's foreign-born population in 1920.[2]

Starting in the 1920s, there was a significant migration of the Jewish population to the north of the city from the poorer areas, like Hunter Street. It was not only the historically wealthier German Jewish community that moved, but many poorer Jews whose primary language was Yiddish, migrated there also. As the north became the clear center of the Jewish population in the city, the synagogues moved there as well. By 1945, two-thirds of the city's Jews lived in the northeast, and many of those who did not would later move there.[2]

While Zionism was gaining traction in Jewish communities around the world and U.S., it was slower to catch on in Atlanta. This was partially due to Rabbi David Marx's staunch anti-Zionist views and which were influential due to his leadership of The Temple. It was not until the 1920s that support for Zionism began to grow in the community, although there were a few small, frequently inactive Zionist organizations that started years prior. A gathering celebrating the Allies of World War Is support for a Jewish national home in Palestine at the San Remo conference amassed over 2,000 people in 1920. A Hadassah chapter was established in 1916, and had 300 members by 1937.[2]

Between the turn of the century and the late 1920s the main three synagogues came under steady leadership, and each of their rabbis went on to stay in the position for decades. Rabbi David Marx served The Temple for 51 years (18951946), Rabbi Tobias Geffen served Shearith Israel for 60 years (19101970), and Rabbi Harry Epstein served Ahavath Achim for 54 years (19281982). Over their distinguished tenures, they each had a large impact on the face of the Jewish community and its values.[2]

Rabbi Marx was very active in bridge-building with the larger non-Jewish/Christian community in Atlanta, and was largely seen by non-Jews in the city as being the representative of the Jewish community at large. This idea, however, was problematic as Rabbi Marx held very liberal Reform views, and was primarily representative only of the smaller but established and influential German Jewish community.[2] Rabbi Marx also lead the congregation's shift into classical Reform Judaism after years of internal ideological squabbles in the congregation which had eventually resulted in his hiring in 1895. He also was a staunch anti-Zionist, due to his desire for Jews to assimilate in the U.S., and was key in the passage of his congregations' 1897 anti-Zionist resolution and feeling.[13] Under his leadership, the congregation significantly grew in size and moved to a new location in the north of the city.

Rabbi Tobias Geffen was born in Lithuania, received his ordination there, and started his family there before immigrating to the U.S. He first settled in New York and Ohio prior to accepting his position at Shearith Israel and moving with his family to Atlanta in 1910. Upon his arrival, Rabbi Geffen noted a number of problems and gaps in the Orthodox community and sought to remedy them, including the lack of religious schools, the state of the community's mikveh, and the level of kashrut.[14] Within a few years, he became known as a key resource for many of the Orthodox communities throughout the South that lacked a rabbi of their own, and often travelled to solve problems. Rabbi Geffen is best known for first certifying Coca-Cola as kosher, and kosher for Passover. As the prominent Orthodox rabbi in the region, he began receiving letters from across the country asking whether or not Coca-Cola, famously based in Atlanta, was kosher. The soda was seen as a symbol of American identity and, thus, belonging, by the younger generation who were especially eager to partake.[15] Rabbi Geffen sought permission to view Coca-Cola's closely guarded secret formula in order to assess whether it could be deemed kosher, and was eventually granted it after being sworn to secrecy. In his halachic responsa, using initials and code words to refer to ingredients, he outlined two problem ingredients, one which kept the soda from being kosher altogether and another which precluded it from being kosher for Passover. After his responsa, the company started research to solve the issues, and did so successfully. In 1935, Rabbi Geffen issued a new responsa deeming Coca-Cola kosher, and also kosher for Passover as they had agreed to switch to using beet and cane sugar in the weeks before the holiday.[15]

Rabbi Harry Epstein, too, was born in Lithuania and immigrated to the U.S. at the beginning of the 20th century. He was ordained by some of the most prominent rabbis of the time, and his father was an influential and long-serving Orthodox rabbi in Chicago. Despite this, he would lead his congregation, Ahavath Achim, to transition from Orthodox to Conservative. When he took over leading the synagogue, it was in a time when its membership and community had a growing fracture between its older, founding, Yiddish-speaking immigrants and the less traditional English-speaking next generation. Rabbi Epstein gave sermons and taught classes in both English and Yiddish, and helped revitalize the community in his first years. Gradually, changes were implemented in the synagogue, such as the women's section, which went from being in the balcony to part of the sanctuary floor, and eventually was eliminated in favor of mixed gender seating. The opportunities for women's overall participation increased also. Bat mitzvah celebrations for girls took place for the first time, although they were still prohibited from reading from the Torah, and women joined the synagogue choir. Rabbi Epstein's move towards the Conservative movement was influenced by what he perceived as a rightward shift in the U.S. Orthodox community after World War II, that he felt shut the door on progress in the Orthodox world.[16] The congregation official became Conservative in 1954, and its slow slide into the Conservative movement had also lead to the founding of Congregation Beth Jacob in 1943.[2]

Under the 51-year tenure of Rabbi David Marx, the members of The Temple were used to the idea that if it wanted acceptance, it could not afford to rock the boat in non-Jewish/Christian Atlanta society or cause conflict.[17] The congregation's next rabbi, Jacob Rothschild, however, took a different attitude and felt that advocating against segregation and discrimination were moral imperitaves, controversial or not. Many believe that Rabbi Rothschild's outspoken support for the Civil Rights Movement and integration lead to the targeting of The Temple.[18]

In the first hours of October 12, 1958, The Temple was bombed using 50 sticks of dynamite, causing significant damage but no injuries. Not long after the explosion, United Press International (UPI) staff received a call from General Gordon of the Confederate Underground, a white supremacist group saying they carried out the bombing, that it would be the last empty building they bomb, and Jews and African Americans were aliens in the U.S.[19]

The damage to the synagogue was estimated at $100,000,[18] or roughly $868,000 today adjusted for inflation.[20] Donations to help the synagogue recover poured in from every corner of Atlanta and from across the country, although the synagogue had not requested funds. The editor of the Atlanta Constitution newspaper, Ralph McGill, wrote a powerful editorial in the paper denouncing the bombing and any tolerance for hatred in the city, for which he won a Pulitzer Prize.[17]

The government was also quick to respond. Atlanta's mayor, William B. Hartsfield, visited the site of the bombing and condemned it in no uncertain terms. President Dwight D. Eisenhower also decried the attack, and promised the FBIs support in the investigation. Several dozen policemen, as well as Georgia Bureau of Investigation and FBI agents, worked to solve the case. While five people were arrested, and one tried, no one was ever convicted of the crime.[18]

Ironically, in some respects the bombing revealed to the community the privilege that they had. The sweeping outpouring of support and sympathy from the broader Atlanta society, and the swift action taken by officials, showed that they could feel secure now, decades after what happened to Leo Frank.[2] This also made some in the community newly emboldened to speak up against segregation and for civil rights, with the feeling that they could afford to. Synagogue members also more heartily supported Rabbi Rothschilds actions and sermons on civil rights issues afterwards, and the first sermon he gave following the bombing was called And None Shall Make Them Afraid.[17]

At the same time, for many in the African American community, the public and official reactions to the bombing were deeply frustrating, as such terror was inflicted on them more frequently and without support or effective investigations. Responding to Ralph McGill's piece about the bombing, the daughter of slain Florida NAACP director Henry T. Moore lamented the lack of similar outcry or care on the part of the government at the state or federal levels in investigating the crime.[19]

Just after World War II, an estimated 10,217 Jews were living in Atlanta, and only 6% of Jewish adults were not involved in any Jewish organizations. In the 1950s, Atlanta further solidified its status as the Jewish center of the South with the opening of branches of a number Jewish groups, including the Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee.[2]

In the decades following The Temple bombing, the Jewish community also became active in politics again. In 1961, Sam Massell was elected Vice Mayor of the city, and then re-elected in 1965. In 1969, he was elected the first Jewish mayor the city, after winning the vast majority of the African American vote and losing the vast majority of the white vote. A part of his campaign pitch to the African American community was that his experience being Jewish, while not equivalent to the black experience, gave him a better understanding than other white people of the challenges community was facing. He was defeated by Maynard Jackson during his 1973 re-election bid, who became Atlanta's first black mayor, and Massell is the last white mayor of Atlanta to date.[21]

During and in a short period following the Six-Day War, the 16,000 person Atlanta Jewish community managed to raise $1.5 million, which today would be over $11 million adjusted for inflation, for the United Jewish Appeal's Israel Emergency Fund.[22][23]

In 1980, the Jewish population was estimated at 27,500. The community also continued its move northward and to the suburbs, and by 1984, 70% of the area's Jews were living outside of the Atlanta city limits.[2]

From 1975 to 1985, Elliott H. Levitas represented Georgia's 4th congressional district. When Jimmy Carter, who had been Governor of Georgia, was elected President in 1976 several Atlanta Jews such as Stuart E. Eizenstat and Robert Lipshutz moved to Washington with him to work in the administration.[2]

When Atlanta hosted the 1996 Summer Olympics, the Jewish community took action to encourage formal recognition and remembrance of the 11 members of the Israeli Olympic team murdered by a Palestinian terrorist group during the 1972 Summer Olympics, known as the Munich massacre. When it became clear the International Olympic Committee (IOC) was not going to have any commemoration or give a mention, the Atlanta Jewish community, largely through the Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta, organized their own ceremony with the families of the Israelis who were killed.[24]

The Atlanta Jewish community has seen dramatic population boom and demographic change in the last few decades, while Atlanta's overall population has also reached new heights as one of the fastest-growing cities in the U.S. The Jewish community in the metropolitan area went from less than 30,000 in 1980 to 86,000 in 2000 and then 120,000 in 2006 when the last Jewish population survey was undertaken.[2] If Jewish population growth mirrored the general population growth, the Jewish population would have been 130,000 in 2016.[25]

Whereas much of the Atlanta Jewish community has historically been deeply rooted families that prided in their Atlanta and Southern ties, the vast majority of the community today is made up of transplants, and almost a third of the community was born in New York. According to the 2006 population survey, Jews who have moved to the area in the last 10 years also outnumber those born in the area, particularly in the northern suburbs.[2]

The number of community institutions and organizations has also increased to keep up with the needs of the community. Today there are 38 synagogues in the area 33 founded after 1968, of which 24 were started between 1984 and 2006. The Orthodox portion of the community is also rapidly growing, and over half of these new congregations are Orthodox or traditional.[2] This has been coupled with an increasing number of kosher restaurants and supermarket sections and the establishment of eruvim in several northern suburbs. Additionally, five congregations have their own mikveh and there are a number of Jewish day schools across the ideological spectrum. Despite this, the community is one of less religiously affiliated in the U.S., as the vast majority of Jewish families do not belong to a synagogue.[1]

While Ashkenazi Jews make up the majority of the community, as is common in most of the country, Atlanta is also home to one of the U.S.'s largest Sephardi populations.[1]

William Breman Jewish Heritage & Holocaust Museum, opened in 1985, has a large archive of and exhibits Atlanta's Jewish history, as well as educating about the Holocaust. There are also Holocaust memorials in Greenwood Cemetery and at the Marcus JCC's Zaban Park. The Marcus JCC is named in honor of Bernie Marcus, who along with Arthur Blank founded Home Depot, and both of whom are major donors in the Jewish community in Atlanta and beyond.[1]

The Atlanta Jewish Times, formerly the Southern Israelite, provides Jewish news for the city and the Southeast.[1]

Jewish schools include:

The rest is here:

History of the Jews in Atlanta - Wikipedia

Why Judaism calls on us to put ideals into practice – St. Louis Jewish Light

Posted By on January 30, 2022

Congregation Bnai Amoona. Photo: Bill Motchan

Rabbi Jeffrey AbrahamJanuary 27, 2022

Our parshah this week, Mishpatim, embraces law after law right on the heels of the Ten Commandments. Our foremost commentator, Rashi, points out that Mishpatim should be viewed as a continuation of the previous parshah, Yitro. Why? How?

The very first word of our parshah is Veileh. Rashi notes that when the word eileh these are begins with a vav denoting that it is a continuation or, moseif al horeshonim, an extension of that which preceded it. Here, it is the law we were given at Sinai. The Ten Commandments are the foundational ideals that guide us. How do the seemingly random laws of Mishpatim relate to the monumental principles articulated at Sinai? For this limited purpose, the answer is Mishpatim elucidates the Ten Commandments.

Judaism never intended for its major principles to remain merely conceptual or in the realm of lofty ideals. Our tradition has always taught that our ideals must be put into practice. Without transforming our principles into defined action we can never hope to attain the ultimate vision enunciated in last weeks parshah that we become a kingdom of priests and a holy nation. (Exodus 19:6)

We are called upon to heal the sick, welcome the stranger, and extend our reach in all areas of knowledge and wisdom for the betterment of the world. The words that were heard by the Israelites at Sinai are placed into a practical format in Mishpatim. The parshityot of Yitro andMishpatimare placed back-to-back because they are really two sides of the same coin: our mission as a people begins with ideals, but it is absolutely critical that these principles be annotated and incorporated into a system that guides our daily life. The paradigms only have meaning when they are translated into engagement. After the recent hostage incident at Beth Israel in Colleyville, Texas and the ongoing stresses of the pandemic, we need to be reminded to reach out to one another and be there for each other. Take time to engage with one another, not only checking on our physical health, but mental health as well.

Judaism is more than a religion; its a way of life. As Herman Wouk (of the Cain Mutiny, Marjorie Morningstar, and the Winds of War) noted in This is My God (1959, p. 137): It is a daily commitment in action to ones faith, a formal choice, a quiet self-discipline. Each of us in his or her own way is on the same quest.

Shabbat Shalom!

Rabbi Jeffrey Abraham serves Congregation Bnai Amoona and is a member of the St. Louis Rabbinical Association, which coordinates the dvar Torah for the Jewish Light.

Here is the original post:

Why Judaism calls on us to put ideals into practice - St. Louis Jewish Light

Decorating the Dungeon | Vance Morgan – Patheos

Posted By on January 30, 2022

I am currently rereading Virginia Woolfs 1925 novel Mrs. Dalloway for one of my team-taught courses where it will be the central seminar text in a couple of weeks. I havent read or taught it in a dozen years, so its as if Im reading it for the first time. This course is an interdisciplinary exploration of the history, literature, theology, philosophy, and art of the twentieth centuryMrs. Dalloway introduces a number of themes that will be central in many of the texts we focus on this semester.

Mrs. Dalloway is a creative and post-modern presentation of just another day in between-the-wars London through the eyes, stream of consciousness, and thoughts of Clarissa Dalloway. Clarissa is a fifty-something upper-middle class woman who is throwing a party that evening. . Her daughters history tutor observes that Clarissa came from the most worthless of all classesthe rich, with a smattering of culture. Theres no particular reason for the partyshe just likes planning and hosting parties. Clarissas husband Richard and others often ask her why she throws such partiesher reflections on this question raise an issue that was more and more pressing for millions of people post-World War I. As Iris Murdoch phrased it, What can we do now that there is no God? In a world in which it is more and more difficult to believe in a good God, how is one to live?

Clarissas short answer to the question about halfway through the novel is that over time she had evolved this atheists religion of doing good for the sake of goodness. She doesnt need to believe in God in order to recognize the exquisite moments that she unexpectedly encounters daily; such moments are sufficient reason to be generous in seeking to create similar moments for others. Later an old friend. Peter Walsh, is thinking about Clarissa and describes deeper reasons for her commitment to goodness.

Oddly enough, she was one of the most thorough-going skeptics he had ever met . . . As the whole thing is a bad joke, let us, at any rate, do our part . . . decorate the dungeon with flowers and air-cushions; be as decent as we possibly can. Those ruffians, the Gods, shant have it all their own wayher notion being that the Gods, who never lost a chance of hurting, thwarting, and spoiling human lives were seriously put out if, all the same, you behaved like a lady.

Close to two decades later, as World War II was raging, Albert Camus developed a similar position in his philosophical essay The Myth of Sisyphus (which we will be reading later this semester). How is one to imagine moral behavior and inspiration in a world without God?

Camus argues that the motivation for such a life begins with facing things as they are and accepting no excuses or exits of consolation. We live in an absurd worldbut that does not eliminate the possibility of moral commitment.

The absurd man thus catches sight of a burning and frigid, transparent and limited universe in which nothing is possible but everything is given, and beyond which all is collapse and nothingness. He can then decide to accept such a universe and draw from it his strength, his refusal to hope, and the unyielding evidence of a life without consolation.

One can choose to live without consoling and comforting stories. Toward the end of his essay, Camus imagines Oedipus, old and blind, ravaged throughout his life by forces beyond his control. Rather than despair, Oedipus choose otherwise.

I conclude that all is well, says Oedipus, and that remark is sacred. It echoes in the wild and limited universe of man. It teaches that all is not, has not been, exhausted. It drives out of this world a god who had come into it with dissatisfaction and a preference for futile sufferings. It makes of fate a human matter, which must be settled among men.

A central issue in my ethics courses has always been whether moral behavior is connected in any essential way to belief in something greater than ourselves. Many, perhaps, most, people of faith assume that it is. If one believes, for instance, that human nature is fundamentally flawed (call it original sin, if you like), then moral goodness in a human life must be energized with divine assistance. Yet students, many of whom have been taught something like this for their whole lives, know intuitively that moral atheist is not an oxymoron. Although moral goodness can be placed within a framework of faith, does it have to be?

A Jewish friend and colleague told me a number of years ago that Judaism is the only monotheistic religion in which one can be both a faithful member and an atheist. It struck me as an obvious overstatement at the time, but over the years I have returned to her observation, because it says something very interesting both about Judaism and faith in general. As Ive learned more and more about Judaism over the years, my friends comment has made more sense. Judaism is an orthopraxic faith, one based on right practice rather than on right belief, on which orthodox religions tend to focus. As Rabbi Jonathan Sacks, the former chief rabbi of the British Commonwealth who died in 2020, once said in an interview,

[Jews] believe in salvation every day. We believe that salvation comes through good deeds. Not through faith. Thats not to say that God isnt the fundamental motivation why you do things. But we believe that we have a personal responsibility for our actions and accountability to God . . . Jews believe that God expects you to do good in the world. That you are His partner.

Partnership with God is a significantly different perspective than obedience to the divine. Reflecting on this over time has incrementally changed how I conceive of my Christian faith.

Another twentieth century figure who plays a central role in my classes this semester is Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the Lutheran pastor and theologian who was executed by the Nazis in 1945 for his role in a failed attempt to assassinate Adolf Hitler. The execution took place less than a month before the end of World War II. Bonhoeffer spent close to two years in prison before his execution; his letters from prison sketch a very different understanding of Christianity than the Protestantism that he was taught and that he preached in his younger years. In a letter to his friend Eberhard Bethge, Bonhoeffer writes

God would have us know that we must live as people who manage our lives without God. The God who is with us is the God who forsakes us. The God who lets us live in the world without the working hypothesis of God is the God before whom we stand continually.

Bonhoeffer also writes that

Our being Christians today will be limited to two things: prayer and action for justice on behalf of people. All Christian thinking, speaking, and organizing must be born anew out of this prayer and action.

It is passages such as these that cause people to say that Bonhoeffer was imagining a religionless Christianity as he awaited his death in prison. Sort of like my friends atheistic Judaismout of the traditional box, but food for thought.

Moral behavior does not depend on believing in the existence of something greater or beyond what is right in front of us. For those who are persons of faith, Rabbi Sacks reminds us that we are partners with the divine on a daily basis, even if we are thoroughly confused and uncertain about the exact nature of what or whom one is partnering with. Sacks often spoke of a margin of mystery, something beyond what our categories can comprehend. It is in that margin where much of faith resides. Among other things, recognizing the margin of mystery opens the door to continual surprise, frequently from sources one does not expect.

One of the ways God surprises us is by letting a Jew or a Christian discover the trace of Gods presence in a Buddhist monk or a Sikh tradition of hospitality or the graciousness of Hindu life. You know, dont think we can confine God into our categories. God is bigger than religion.

See the original post here:

Decorating the Dungeon | Vance Morgan - Patheos

When we combat antisemitism, we will be able to combat any form of hatred in the world – European Jewish Press

Posted By on January 30, 2022

When we combat antisemitism, we will be able to combat any form of hatred in the world, said Joel Mergui, president of the Jewish Consistoire of Paris and of the European Centre of Judaism, as addressed last week a symposium in Kiev, Ukraine, on the eve of International Holocaust Remembrance Day.

His remarks came as a new study reveals the extent of antisemitism in France, homr of the largest Jewish community in Europe.

The number of antisemitic acts in 2021 grew in France in comparison with 2020. Especially a growing in violence. There is a rise of extremes in France, in Europe and the rest of the world. It is very worrying as this antisemitism is coming from both the extreme right and the extreme left but also from islamism, said Mergui.

The survey carried out by Ifop reveals that 68% of French Jews have already been insulted because of their religion and that 20% of them have been victims of physical aggression. A phenomenon rooted in school.

In France, 55% of Jewish parents advise their children against wearing a distinctive sign for fear that they will be the target of physical or verbal aggression.

The survey by the Foundation for Political Innovation and the American Jewish Committee reveals the ex weight of prejudice.

Negative stereotypes towards Jews are still as present in France, write the authors of the new Radiographie de lantismitisme.

Puns, insults, verbal and physical attacks, the year 2021 has been marked by the multiplication of anti-Semitic incidents, the suvey says. 74% of French Jews say they have already experienced anti-Semitic behavior, from mockery to physical aggression, through insults or verbal threats.

Two thirds of the French people questioned believe that anti-Semitism is widespread (64%) and on the rise. Most French people of Jewish faith or culture (73%) believe that anti-Semitism has become more and more prevalent over the past ten years. This survey also reveals that 30% of those questioned agree with the idea that Jews are richer than the average French person.

Other clichs persist: Jews have too much power in the field of economy and finance resonates with 26% of respondents. 24% of respondents find that Jews have too much power in the media. These numbers are stable compared to the survey conducted in 2016.

53% of respondents have already been insulted

Thoughts about Jews remain entrenched, and bad taste jokes are still present. Two-thirds of the French people surveyed (68%) have already witnessed derogatory mockery or vexatious remarks. These derogatory mockery cannot be put on the same level as violent acts, but their magnitude testifies to the permanence within French society of old anti-Semitic prejudices, prejudices that Jews are frequently confronted with, the study says.

Jews are not only victims of jokes, anti-Semitic acts persist. 53% of respondents say they have received insults (48% in 2019), threats of assault (24% in 2021, for 22% in 2019), theft and damage (22% in 2021 and 2019) and physical assault (20% in 2021, 23% in 2019) according to the survey.

Social networks have become one of the spaces where anti-Semitic speech is released the most according to the survey: 28% of French Jews say they have already been threatened on social networks, a proportion that even reaches 46% for those under 25 years old. More and more young people say they are victims of anti-Semitism. In 2019, 53% of 18-24 claimed to have been insulted at least once, they are now 63%. Social networks are often cited, but school has become the first place of exposure to anti-Semitic violence.

60% of victims report having been assaulted at school, 42% of them on several occasions. Jewish families have understood this and often ask their children not to wear recognizable signs of their Jewishness, and even to avoid revealing the fact that they are Jewish. This is why these families are increasingly sending their children to denominational schools, Catholic or Jewish, the survey says.

This study also shows that a certain category of the population proves to be more receptive to anti-Semitic prejudices: men over 65 years old. The spread of anti-Semitic prejudice is also more prevalent on the far left and far right, the researchers noted.

The survey also indicates that nearly half of French Jews (46%) have already considered leaving France, which is six points less than in the 2019 study. What changes are the reasons for leaving. 13% of respondents want to leave France because of fears for their future, compared to 21% in 2019. On the other hand, cultural or religious reasons have increased in three years, from 6% to 12%.

In their conclusions, the researchers noted that between a quarter and a third of our fellow citizens share these anti-Semitic prejudices. This new X-ray of anti-Semitism confirms the persistence of anti-Semitism at the heart of French society.

Joel Mergui Mergui has called for the nomination of a person responsible for the fight against antisemitism in each country in Europe. Unfortunately often countries nominate a person responsible for all hatred. Each hatred must be treated differently and Antisemitism must be treated specifically, he said.

While these statistics are a reason for pessimism, Mergui said that our responsibility today is that Judaism continues to live.

There is also a reason for optimism because today there is the State of Israel. Half of the Jewish population lives in its land of origin and another half living in the world go back to synagogues, traditions, claim their identity. Let us continue to proudly wear the kippah and make Judaism live, he added.

More here:

When we combat antisemitism, we will be able to combat any form of hatred in the world - European Jewish Press

30 years after the fall of USSR, Russian-speaking Jews go global – Ynetnews

Posted By on January 30, 2022

Several years after the fall of the Iron Curtain, when David Rozenson first returned to his hometown of Leningrad, (which he left for the United States as a child), to train teachers for Judaism programs, he was astonished by the passion of his students for everything Jewish, after the Soviet regime sought for decades to erase every trace of Jewish education. "I will never forget the notebooks they filled out in handwriting, their passion for learning Hebrew, for reading poetry. It was not just a flame, it was a roaring fire," he remembers.

Rozenson, now the executive director of Beit Avi Chai, a Jewish cultural center in Jerusalem, has lived in several Russian-speaking Jewish communities - from his childhood and adolescence in the United States, through studies in Israel to living for more than a decade in Moscow, where he was active in formulating and implementing Jewish curricula and community events. His journey, like a drop of water, reflects the contemporary reality of millions of Jews, who were liberated 30 years ago from the yoke of Soviet rule and today constitute a fascinating global community, of which one million Russian-speaking Israeli citizens are an important part.

6

Taglit Birthright Mega Event

(Photo: Courtesy for GPG)

Russian-speaking Jews in the United States: A variety of currents, assimilation, and Israel

Besides Israel, the other main location of Russian-speaking Jews today is the United States, where between 400,000 and 600,000 Jews and their families arrived. "Of these, over 100,000 arrived in the 1970s and 1980s, but most of them emigrated after the dissolution of the Soviet Union," notes Dr. Nati Kantorovich, head of information and research at Nativ in the Prime Minister's Office.

Among Russian-speaking Jews in the United States, the older Soviet generation, who carried the heavy task of immigration and building a new life, shows a greater closeness to Judaism, as part of the identity with which they came to their new land. "The older generation worked to establish community organizations, and Russian-speaking Jews are known as the most pro-Israel Jewish community in the United States," says Dr. Kantorovich.

The younger generations, on the other hand, are much more involved in American society. As in many immigrant communities, some young people try to get away from their roots, "and some absorb local perceptions about diverse issues, including Israel," says Dr. Kantorovich. This means both adopting critical anti-Israeli perceptions that exist to one degree or another in U.S. universities and, on the other hand, being very active and vocal in support of Israel for example, SSI (Students Supporting Israel) was founded by Jews from the former Soviet Union.

6

Limmud FSU New York

(Photo: Courtesy for GPG)

This deeper integration of the younger Russian-speakers in America brings with it worries of assimilation, which is a common problem of the general Jewish community in U.S., but also new opportunities for wider contribution to American Jewish life. "Many second-and third-generation immigrants are in leadership positions in Jewish communities, on campuses, in Jewish organizations," Rozenson says. "You can also see a growing number of intellectuals and entrepreneurs, many of whom came as children from Russia, who are becoming very important in literature, culture, society and business in the Jewish community and in American society as a whole."

Germany: Dealing with the memory of the Holocaust

6

Jewrovision in Germany

(Photo: Courtesy for GPG)

Another focus is Germany, where the vast majority of the current Jewish community is made up of Jews from the former Soviet Union. "There are about 220,000 Jews and their families living in Germany, most of whom came after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, half of them Jews according to Jewish law," says Dr. Kantorovich.

"The very fact that Jews immigrated to Germany presents them with a significant issue that Jews who came to Israel or the United States did not have to deal with - the memory of the Holocaust at the place where it originated," says Dr. Kantorovich. "In studies conducted in recent decades and also in dialogue with Jews on the ground, one can see the discussion and concerns surrounding such a sensitive issue."

Similar to the community in the United States, the younger generation has more complex Jewish perceptions. The younger generation of Russian-speaking Jews in Germany sees themselves more as European citizens. "They come to the big cities, use the European passport to travel and live around the world," says Dr. Kantorovich. Nevertheless, the resurgent threat of antisemitism has mobilized the young generation of former Soviet Jews in Germany. This is a community that is very combative when it comes to defending its identity," notices Marina Yudborovsky. Whenever they are, Russian-speaking Jews went there to be free and to live their Jewish life as they see fit, and if they have to defend this privilege, they will. We see very spirited movement in Germany as these Jews step up to combat antisemitism and support Israel.

6

Festival of Resilience by Base Hillel

(Photo: Courtesy for GPG)

The post-Soviet space: Building diverse communities and accepting Jews in the public and political space

Simultaneously with the waves of immigration of Jews to various countries around the world over the past decades, many Jews remained in the post-Soviet space Dr. Kantorovich estimates the number between 900,000 and one million. And what do the Jews do? Build communities, plural, each to his own liking. Dr. Kantorovich notices that "there are Israeli, Western, religious and secular elements that work extensively to establish and develop communities, and you can even observe the familiar division between the movements Judaism in the post-Soviet space - Reform, Conservative, Chabad, Lithuanian. There is a variety of possibilities, so that every Jew can connect to the community that suits them best."

It must be said, that, regardless of the complicated politics of the region, the official attitude towards Jews in almost every post-Soviet country underwent nothing short of a climate change the glaciers of state-sponsored antisemitism are gone, hopefully for good. Jewish life has become public, and the needs of the communities are recognized and taken into account by the local leadership.

6

Opening of the exhibition, dedicated to Soviet Jews at Wende Museum, LA

(Photo: Courtesy for GPG)

Another proof of change is the presence of Jews in key public positions. "In Ukraine, a Jew is elected president, in Latvia the president is Jewish on his father's side," says Dr. Kantorovich. "In Russia, government officials with Jewish roots serve. Today the Jews are part of the political, business and cultural life, without hiding their Judaism." This means also connecting openly and passionately with Israel. Nativ, which was established by Ben-Gurion and for many years worked in secrecy to connect with the Jews behind Iron Curtain, today works openly, bringing Israel to local Jews. "Today no one peeks behind their backs anymore to see if anyone is following him and lurking for him. It shows a lot about the current atmosphere," says Dr. Kantorovich.

The connection to Israel is strong and maintained by many and varied bodies - official Israeli institutions such as the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Nativ as well as the Jewish Agency, work freely for cultural and social rapprochement. "Jewish organizations celebrate Israeli holidays and memorial days, organize public demonstrations of support for Israel, the study of the Hebrew language has become visible and quite a few master it at various levels. When there is a dialogue about Israel in the media, representatives of Jewish organizations are invited to be interviewed and speak for Israel.

6

Taglit mega event

(Photo: Courtesy for GPG)

Taking Russia as an example, Rozenson believes that "there is no doubt that the State of Israel serves as a critical connection point for many Jews in Russia today. The number of Jews who immigrated to Israel, who have relatives in Russia, produces a critical connection for the development of Russian Jews. It is critical in expanding the current initiatives and creating new and meaningful ways for Russian Jews to learn, to participate in Jewish life. The same is true for the other post-Soviet countries as well.

One of the main concerns of Jewish communities in the area is aging. "The median age of Jews in the post-Soviet space is higher than 50," says Dr. Kantorovich. "However, the younger generation of Jews developed a higher awareness of their Jewish identity, and there is a phenomenon of multiple identities - it is possible to be part of several worlds and to carry several identities, without giving up any of them. A situation is created in which young people begin to influence their parents, and the funnel of loss of Jewish consciousness turns another way."

Despite the challenges, Marina Yudborovsky sees a promising future for Russian-Jewish global community. New generations of Russian speaking Jews combine enormous thirst for Jewish knowledge, deep appreciation of their identity, strong connection with Israel and worldwide network of personal and family ties. They can play a pivotal role in global Jewish dialogue between Israel and Diaspora, strengthening the unity of Jewish people.

Go here to read the rest:

30 years after the fall of USSR, Russian-speaking Jews go global - Ynetnews


Page 505«..1020..504505506507..510520..»

matomo tracker