Page 641«..1020..640641642643..650660..»

Remembering the life of Irgun member and activist Shulamit Dissentshik – The Jerusalem Post

Posted By on October 2, 2021

Shulamit Dralitz Pashtizky Dissentshik, my late mother, was born in 1911 in Tsarist Russia. Her father, Yehoshua Dralitz, was an ardent Zionist and was also passionate about learning the Hebrew language. He arrived for a visit in the Land of Israel in 1924, at which time he decided he would speak only Hebrew with his family members. He wrote my mother a postcard in Hebrew, which even my grandmother didnt know how to read yet. My grandfather veered towards the right with regard to his political views, though Shulamit was drawn more towards Hashomer Hatzair. In 1930, at the age of 19, she was the only female representative of the organization at the world conference in Danzig.

Many important figures in the political and cultural spheres of the Polish-Jewish community would pay visits to the home of her parents, Shifra and Yehoshua Dralitz, which was later turned into a museum that tells the 1,000-year-long history of the Jews of Poland. There would be many heated discussions about Zionism and aliyah, and Shulamit spoke about these topics with an intense level of seriousness. She abandoned her university studies in German literature and spent all of her time engaged in helping the Zionist cause.

cnxps.cmd.push(function () { cnxps({ playerId: '36af7c51-0caf-4741-9824-2c941fc6c17b' }).render('4c4d856e0e6f4e3d808bbc1715e132f6'); });

When Shulamit met and became enamored with Chaim Pashtiztki, she let him know that she would only agree to marry him if they would make aliyah and live in Israel. Their wedding was attended by both Jabotinsky and Grossman, who were heavily involved in the Zionist Revisionist Movement, but had taken opposing sides when the organization had undergone an internal division. My grandfather and mother tried to use the occasion of the wedding to bring about a reconciliation between the two, but to no avail.

The pair did agree to converse with each other, but both remained stalwart in their positions. Immediately following the wedding in 1933, my mother fulfilled her lifelong dream and made aliyah with her husband. They set up their home in Haifa, and my mother took a job as the personal assistant to Zelig Soskin, who was involved in the establishment of Nahariya.

My mothers younger sister, Haviva, with whom she was extremely close, made aliyah the year after, in 1934, with her husband, Avraham Tehomi, who is also known for his colorful story. To this day, Tehomi is believed to be responsible for the murder of Jacob Isral de Haan, a Dutch Jew who engaged in anti-Zionist political activity. In 1938, my aunt separated from Tehomi, who was a founding member of the pre-state Jewish military establishment in Israel. Until the day she died, my aunt refused to tell me if she knew any details about the murder. She, too, had held a senior position in the IDF, retiring in 1952 with the rank of lieutenant-colonel.

In 1935, my grandparents followed their daughters and made aliyah. My grandfather found a job working for Migdal Insurance while continuing with his efforts to create a national Israeli gas company that would pipe natural gas into peoples homes, as was done in Europe. Then, in 1936, tragedy hit my mother was widowed when her husband died of a heart attack. She moved in with her parents in their home in Tel Aviv, and three years later she met and married my father. Fifteen months later, in 1940, I came into the world. Throughout her entire life in the Land of Israel, my mother was active in the public affairs of the country, first in the Irgun, and later in the Herut Political Party and in the General Zionists Party, on whose list she was ranked number 38 in the election for the Third Knesset.

Following the end of World War II and the establishment of the state, my mother spent her time helping new immigrants by hiring a different woman to help her at home each day. When people asked why she did this, she answered, that these poor women were too proud to accept charity, but they would happily work to earn their pay, and this way my mother could help many families.

When I was little, every morning my mother would go visit a woman named Homkeh, who lived in the building next door. After staying inside for a while, they would then leave together, and they could be seen crying and talking as they walked down the street on their way to work. Many years later, journalist Shaul Schiff enlightened me to the situation. At house number 32, a scrawny woman named Homkeh, which was short for Nechama, lived alone in the dilapidated attic apartment. Her cheeks were sunken and her clothes were tattered. We would always see her muttering to herself in Yiddish, and the children in the neighborhood would tease and taunt her continuously until shed break down crying. After she calmed down, she would begin singing a sad lullaby to herself in Yiddish.

When Homkeh passed away, Schiff went with my mother to see Homkehs room, which he described in the following way: There were dozens of dolls on her bed, some of them male and some female, and she had apparently stitched a name onto each one. Haimkeh, Toiveh, Zissel, Moisheh Some of the girls had swollen stomachs to indicate that they were pregnant. Each doll also had a few words in Yiddish written on them, such as, She is a pretty girl, or He has a wild head. On one she had written, Oy, mein tateh, mein tateh (my father, my father). All the dolls had been arranged in the shape of an ellipse on her bed, and apparently she would sleep with all of them surrounding her.

After reading this description, I finally realized that my mother had gone to visit Homkeh every day in order to help her recover from her night terrors and the memory of losing all of her family members whod perished in the Shoah. My mother would help Homkeh come back to reality enough so that she could get herself to work each morning. They would walk down Harav Kook Street, then onto Haari and Rabbi Akiba streets, then cut through the Carmel Market.

If my mother had still been with us today, she would have been celebrating her 110th birthday. But she died 64 years ago at the age of 46.

Translated by Hannah Hochner.

Read more here:

Remembering the life of Irgun member and activist Shulamit Dissentshik - The Jerusalem Post

At 81, Sharon Silverman reflects on a life of trailblazing volunteerism J. – The Jewish News of Northern California

Posted By on October 2, 2021

Sharon Silverman has never worked a day in her life for pay, that is. But the outgoing, energetic 81-year-old just cant stop offering her time and efforts as a volunteer.

The native San Franciscan assists Jewish communal organizations and now serves on a number of committees at the Peninsula Regent in San Mateo, an independent living community for ages 60 and older where she has lived for the past 20 months.

Her late husband used to call her a professional volunteer, Silverman said.

It was important to both of us for me to be involved in the Jewish community.

Silverman grew up in the Sunset District and Lake Merced area, and attended Conservative Congregation Beth Israel. Her mother was a great role model. She belonged to many organizations and was sisterhood president, Silverman said.

After marrying Leonard and having children, Silverman got busy herself. The couple became members of Congregation Sherith Israel in San Francisco and Silverman joined the sisterhood. When she became president and got a seat on the synagogues board of directors, she worked her way up to board president becoming the first woman to hold that position.

Some men thought this is not a womans job, Silverman recalled. There were 18 to 20 people on the board, and the executive committee was all men. I sat with these men. I held my own.

She also served on a rabbinical search committee, chaired the celebrations committee, performed staff evaluations and more. It wasnt difficult, she said.

The Silvermans also joined Peninsula Temple Sholom in Burlingame after Rabbi Daniel Feder took over as senior rabbi in 2006. Again, Silverman found her way to a seat on the board.

And she proved her mettle as first woman president of the Union for Reform Judaism, serving on URJs national board for 19 years. It was great, she said.

Silverman didnt limit her service to synagogues. She served on the boards of the former Brotherhood Way JCC (now the campus of the Brandeis School of San Francisco) and the old Bay Area regional JCC umbrella organization, the UJCC.

I was very fortunate that I had a husband who supported these things, she added. He got involved, too.

While every board I served on was wonderful, Silverman said her experience as a board member of Hebrew Free Loan in San Francisco, starting in 1999, stands out. The nonprofit provides interest-free loans to Jews, and to non-Jews who meet certain criteria.

The executive committee was all men. I sat with these men. I held my own.

As a former president of the organization, from 2016 to 2018, she is a lifetime member.

Its been most rewarding, Silverman said. Its been life-changing for people.

She cites an example from years ago, prior to her daughters wedding. When the wedding planner learned that Silverman was involved with Hebrew Free Loan, she took my hand and said, Thank you. You helped me get through college.

More recently, the pandemic has only upped the demand for assistance, Silverman said. Were hearing a lot from students who want to get back to school, from new businesses trying to get stable. Weve met people who unfortunately need money to pay the rent.

Covid-19 took its toll on Silverman, too. She moved to the Peninsula Regent in March 2020 to be closer to daughters Bonni in San Mateo and Jill in Redwood Shores, and grandson Zachary, 11. Unfortunately, she moved in just in time for the lockdown.

My timing was lousy, said Silverman, who knew no other residents in the condominium community.

Even so, the self-described knitter and needlepointer kept busy getting settled in her new home, and she didnt let the pandemic get her down.

Once restrictions were lifted, Silverman made new friends and jumped right into her usual MO: volunteering. She serves on the garden committee (the gardens are immaculate), the welcoming committee and the Peninsula Regent Charitable Foundation, which awards education scholarships up to $10,000 to deserving employees and their children. Recipients are so grateful for the help, she said.

Terrie Cardoza, membership services coordinator at the Peninsula Regent, raves about Silverman. Noting that the octogenarian moved in at the worst possible time imaginable, Cardoza calls Silverman the most positive, upbeat, grateful person I have met in a very long time.

Between her volunteer commitments and her busy social life, Silverman has little down time these days. Which is exactly the way she wants it. I didnt come here to sit in my apartment all the time, she explained.

As to what she likes most about volunteering, her answer is simple: Helping people.

Continue reading here:

At 81, Sharon Silverman reflects on a life of trailblazing volunteerism J. - The Jewish News of Northern California

Text and the City: a Virtual Tour of the Israeli Linguistic Landscape – The Media Line

Posted By on October 2, 2021

Tue, Oct 5, 2021 6:00 PM - 7:00 PM Central European Summer Time (UTC+2)

Tickets ($12) here.

The languages of Israel can tell us a lot about its societ, history and culture. Join us for a virtual tour the Israeli linguistic landscape

About this event

The languages of Israel can tell us a lot about its social fabric, history and culture. In this talk, Guy will take us through the streets of Israeli cities, deciphering textual graffiti, lost pet ads, texts on t-shirts, shop signs and more. Well learn about the cultural layers of an ever changing society and about the latest trends in Modern Hebrew.

Wake up to the Trusted Mideast News source Mideast Daily News Email

This talk is presented together with the Israeli Cultural Institute in Budapest.

About Guy

Guy Sharett teaches Hebrew in the Shanghai International Studies University in Shanghai, China. He has a B.A in Linguistics of Hebrew Language from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and an M.A from the University of London. Guy, who was born in Ashdod, Israel, speaks 8 languages, and is the presenter of theStreetwise Hebrew podcast, where he teaches Hebrew through music and pop culture, explaining the Israeli psyche through slang expressions and grammar.

More:

Text and the City: a Virtual Tour of the Israeli Linguistic Landscape - The Media Line

Seeing Torah Art Exhibit Talk With Rav Hazzan Aliza Berger – jewishboston.com

Posted By on October 2, 2021

Join us at Hebrew College for our alumni-led talks about the Torah portion of the week as it pertains to our Seeing Torah art exhibit on campus.

Masks are required to enter the building.

Fact Sheet

When

Wednesday, November 17, 2021, 11:00 am - 12:00 pm* Registration closes on November 15th at 1:00 pm

Where

Hebrew College160 Herrick RdNewton Centre, MA 02459

CJP provides the above links concerning third-party events for your convenience only. CJP has no control over the content of the linked-to websites or events they describe, and accepts no responsibility for the websites, including any advertising or products or services on or available from such sites, or for any loss or damage that may arise from your attending, or registering to attend, the described events. If you decide to access any of the third-party websites linked to below, you do so entirely at your own risk and subject to the terms and conditions of use for such websites and event attendance. CJP is not responsible or liable to you or any third party for the content or accuracy of any materials provided by any third parties. All statements and/or opinions expressed in the linked-to materials or at the described events, and all commentary, articles and other content provided at the third-party websites or at the events, are solely the opinions and the responsibility of the persons or entities operating the linked-to websites and events. The inclusion of any link on this website does not imply that CJP endorses the described event, or the linked-to website or its operator.MORE

View original post here:

Seeing Torah Art Exhibit Talk With Rav Hazzan Aliza Berger - jewishboston.com

Helmed by Igor Golyak, ASP’s ‘The Merchant of Venice’ tackles antisemitism from many angles – WBUR

Posted By on October 2, 2021

Expect the unexpected. Its a clich, I know, but the Actors Shakespeare Project production of "The Merchant of Venice," staged by Arlekin Players artistic director Igor Golyak, is not. Using masks, slapstick, game show tunes, a capella numbers and more, Golyaks inventive version (throughOct. 17 at the Boston Center for the Arts Plaza Theatre) takes the classic story for a wild ride and I was thrilled to be on the bus.

The lively ensemble sets up scenes at a fast clip, audibly and with a chalkboard street sign to let audiences know where they are in the story before diving into Golyaks singular vision of this anti-Semitically tinged tale.

Donning a hideous mask with a bulbous nose, no doubt a nod to stereotypes, Nael Nacers Shylock is both funny and empathetic, in keeping with his string of excellent performances. In one scene, he removes the mask when others arent looking and quickly puts it on when others are around, demonstrating that the mask is how the world sees him.

The gist of the narrative is generally the same as Shakespeares in this insightful rendition. Shylock lends money to Antonio (Dennis Trainor), the merchant who has berated and insulted Shylock, calling him a dog. Antonio guarantees the loan for his friend Bassanio (Jesse Hinson) to court and win Portia (Gigi Watson).

Still, Shylock agrees to lend the money. Theres one catch: if the loan isnt repaid, he wants a pound of Antonios flesh. The villainy you teach me, I will execute. And it shall go hard, but I will better the instruction, Shylock says.

A lot is going on in this version, but it works even when it feels a little frenzied. It isnt merely approachable and zany there are moments when it feels like the actors are given the space to pierce through their characters with flashes of themselves, such as Nacer referring to himself as Nael rather than Shylock, or to improvise in other ways where they see fit.

It was refreshing to encounter the piece approached this way, or rather many ways. Theres a nicely done carnival-style photo stand-in used selectively for faces and limbs to poke through, curtain shenanigans, and even a camel suit worn by the remarkably talented Darya Denisova, an Arlekin actor, as Nerissa.

Denisova fully embodies her role and commands the audiences attention whenever she graces the stage, locking eyes with members of the crowd for dramatic effect. Denisova and Watson make a powerful duo. Anna Bortnicks Jessica was also hilarious.

When the show got too serious, a cast member would stop and reset the tone with a clear directive: this is a comedy. And it is. But theres heavy anti-Semitism that comedy can mask if one lets it. Early on, theres a sign that says, Hes not sick, hes a Jew. Shylock is led by a rod with money on it, clearly communicating another stereotype in another scene. Though a comedic approach can make the unpalatable less so, its easy to laugh at that which is complex instead of tending to it and that's another kind of affliction.

Golyaks version of The Merchant of Venice has been a long time coming. The show had two previews before the pandemic shut it down. Despite the long delay, its worth the wait, especially if youre someone who respects the canon but arent used to seeing yourself or maybe the challenges you face in Shakespeare's work. The Merchant of Venice is a little different. Im not Jewish, but as a member of a marginalized group, I know what its like to be perceived a certain way, stereotyped, and discriminated against.

In The Merchant of Venice, Golyaks identity is stamped on the play. Hes a Russian Jew, but more than that, his eclectic and innovative theater language primed throughout the pandemic through his virtual offering like State vs. Natasha Banina and chekhovOS /an experimental game/ is evident.

The show is playful until it isnt. By the final court scene, the changing tide feels abrupt. But pain and injustice are like that too, coming out of nowhere and wreaking havoc. Here, Shylocks rage rumbles for flesh and recognition while Portia calls for mercy. Its an electric finale to a painful, provocative narrative.

"The Merchant of Venice" runs through Oct. 17 at the Boston Center for the Arts Plaza Theatre.

Visit link:

Helmed by Igor Golyak, ASP's 'The Merchant of Venice' tackles antisemitism from many angles - WBUR

Shrinking the Conflict: What Does Israels New Mantra Really Mean? – The New York Times

Posted By on October 2, 2021

JERUSALEM Theres a new three-word concept taking root in political and diplomatic discourse in Jerusalem: shrinking the conflict.

The idea is that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will not be solved in the near future, since the Israeli and Palestinian leaderships are both too divided to restart peace negotiations, let alone reach a peace deal. But Israel can work to reduce the impact of the century-long conflict on Palestinians, thus making peace more likely.

If the conflict cannot be solved, the argument goes, it can at least be shrunk.

The idea has gained momentum since Naftali Bennett replaced Benjamin Netanyahu as Israels prime minister in June. On the day he took office, he promised in a speech to Parliament to contribute to the reduction of friction and the shrinking of the conflict.

Two weeks later, Yair Lapid, the Israeli foreign minister, pledged to minimize the conflict, in a meeting with Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken.

The State Department does not use the term, but its officials channel the concepts logic. They avoid calls for a resumption of negotiations, pressing instead for policies that ensure Palestinians and Israelis experience equal measures of freedom, security, opportunity, and dignity, a formulation Mr. Blinken used in May.

To its supporters, shrinking the conflict is a welcome paradigm shift after the peace process juddered to a halt during Mr. Netanyahus 12-year tenure. Negotiations to establish a Palestinian state petered out in 2014, and Mr. Netanyahu became more dismissive of Palestinian sovereignty. Mr. Bennett also rejects the idea of a Palestinian state, but his backers argue that he is taking steps to improve the lives of Palestinians.

To its critics, the new mantra is merely a rebranding of Israels decades-old approach to the Palestinians. They frame it as a clever public relations strategy that obscures a longstanding intention by successive Israeli leaders, including Mr. Bennett, to expand settlements in the occupied West Bank, entrench Israels presence there and make it harder to reverse the 54-year occupation.

The phrase was coined by Micah Goodman, an Israeli philosopher who is an unofficial adviser to Mr. Bennett.

For the past 12 years, we were trapped in a false dichotomy, Mr. Goodman said in a recent interview. There were attempts to end the conflict, and when they failed, we chose not to do anything about the conflict.

There is another way, he argued, including in articles for The Atlantic and The New York Times. Short of a peace agreement and without withdrawing from the West Bank, the government could still take concrete steps to promote Palestinians economic independence and prosperity.

Shrinking the Israeli-Palestinian conflict wouldnt solve or end the conflict, Mr. Goodman wrote in The Times. It would contain it, it would lessen it. It would broaden the Palestinians freedom of movement, their freedom to develop and their freedom to prosper.

So far, the Bennett governments attempts to improve the status quo include a promise to provide 4G mobile internet to Palestinians in the West Bank; reduce the number of Israeli army raids in the nearly 40 percent of the West Bank that is administered by the Palestinian Authority; and potentially build nearly 900 new Palestinian homes in the areas run by Israel.

The Bennett government has also lent the Palestinian government $156 million to help it survive a financial crisis; allowed a further 15,000 Palestinians to work in Israel; and pledged to regularize the status of thousands of West Bank Palestinians who lack proper paperwork. Public contact between Israeli and Palestinian officials has also increased since Mr. Bennett took office, after years of minimal ties under Mr. Netanyahu.

Explaining his approach in an interview with The Times in August, Mr. Bennett said: Theyre not going anywhere, were not going anywhere were here together, stuck. But then what do we do? Economy, economy, economy.

He said that if people have a good future, have a reasonable job, can provide for their family with dignity and send their kids to good education, this would prove way more important than dealing with the usual stuff that got us nowhere.

To Mr. Goodman, these are welcome measures but not exactly what he meant when he first wrote about shrinking the conflict in 2019.

Mr. Goodmans idea was not just to improve the quality of Palestinian life, but to expand Palestinian self-rule. He proposed expanding the Palestinian Authoritys area of jurisdiction, providing more land for Palestinian officials to allocate for building projects. And he suggested creating a network of Palestinian-patrolled highways in the West Bank, allowing Palestinians to move around without spending hours at Israeli checkpoints.

All this, Mr. Goodman reckoned, could be achieved without returning to negotiations, and without addressing more contentious issues such as the future of Jerusalem, which is claimed by both sides as their capital.

Its misunderstood by many reporters around the world that shrinking the conflict means making life easier and better for Palestinians, he said. I am all for that. Thats great. But thats not what stands at the heart of shrinking-the-conflict paradigm shift. Shrinking the conflict is about increasing Palestinian self-governance. Its about increasing Palestinian freedom freedom to build, freedom of movement.

Mr. Bennetts critics argue that he is less interested in shrinking the conflict than ignoring it.

In his speech to the United Nations on Monday, he did not once mention the Palestinians.

And while some of his policies display an attempt to reduce tensions in the West Bank, others perpetuate practices that have contributed to, rather than shrunk, the conflict.

The governments plan to build nearly 900 new Palestinian homes was accompanied by a proposal to build nearly three times as many Israeli homes in the occupied territories. Critics said the settlement expansion would make it far harder to create a contiguous Palestinian state, rendering a peace agreement even less likely.

The military has continued to use live fire during protests, clashes and confrontations. Since Mr. Bennett took office, 20 Palestinian civilians have been killed, more than three times as many as during the equivalent periods in the last three years, according to records compiled by the United Nations.

The Bennett government has also permitted public Jewish prayer at the Aqsa Mosque compound in Jerusalem, a policy that began covertly under Mr. Netanyahu and that threatens a delicate arrangement aimed at keeping the peace at one of the most contentious sites in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

A recent Palestinian poll suggested that more than half of Palestinians are largely happy with the new policies that aim to make their lives easier, but a similar number also support armed resistance against the occupation.

Mairav Zonszein, a Tel Aviv-based analyst for the International Crisis Group, a research group, said Israels military presence in the West Bank makes it hard to reduce the conflict.

While Bennetts policy of shrinking the conflict with the Palestinians seeks to keep the West Bank quiet by assuaging some of the most egregious Israeli restrictions on Palestinian livelihood, Israels permanent occupation of the West Bank remains an obstacle to that goal, she said. You cant have economic peace or stability under occupation, because occupation prioritizes Israeli interests, resources and expansionism over all else.

Jonathan Shamir contributed reporting.

View original post here:

Shrinking the Conflict: What Does Israels New Mantra Really Mean? - The New York Times

530 students confirmed as infected with coronavirus – The Jerusalem Post

Posted By on October 2, 2021

The Health Ministry is considering requesting that the last three countries listed on the red or banned countries list be removed, The Jerusalem Post confirmed, as students returned to school and serious cases declined.

Currently, there are three countries on the banned list Turkey, Brazil and Bulgaria. The infection rate in these countries has been on the decline, as in most parts of the world.

The Health Ministry said it would release an official statement when a final decision is made.

cnxps.cmd.push(function () { cnxps({ playerId: '36af7c51-0caf-4741-9824-2c941fc6c17b' }).render('4c4d856e0e6f4e3d808bbc1715e132f6'); });

Israelis are not allowed to travel to red countries without special permission. Anyone who returns to Israel from these lands must enter isolation for a minimum of seven days.

The report was first released by Israel Hayom.

Meanwhile, Israeli children returned to school on Thursday after the Sukkot holiday filled with excitement and armed with the results of their rapid home antigen tests that were taken the night before.

Once again, parents in Israel in all sectors taught their children... a lesson in remarkable responsibility and social commitment, said Yigal Slovik, director-general of the Education Ministry. Despite doubts the parents of students in preschool and elementary schools proved for the second time that they can be trusted.

Some 1.4 million antigen tests were picked up from Magen David Adom before the holiday ended and more than 90% of parents tested their children for coronavirus before sending them back to school as part of what the director-general called Operation Antigen 2.

Some 600,000 parents reported tests through the digital reporting system provided by the Health Ministry and the rest submitted paper reporting forms, Slovik said.

Only 0.1% of students tested positive, he added. By not sending these children to school, it prevented the closure of about 1,000 classrooms and the isolation of as many as 30,000 students.

Testing children for COVID was required for entry into school on Thursday. Parents who did not screen their kids were asked not to send them.

Parents were requested to screen their kids before school started on September 1 as well. Some 8,000 cases of the virus had been identified.

Prime Minister Naftali Bennett has charged the Education Ministry with finding ways to help keep children out of isolation beyond the Green Class program, which next week will begin being evaluated in another 300 classrooms. Among the ideas is to arm parents with around two dozen testing kits and to ask them to screen their kids anytime they experience COVID symptoms.

The country continues to experience a decline in infection.

Some 3,591 people were diagnosed with the virus on Wednesday, the Health Ministry reported Thursday morning only 3.61% of people screened showed a positive result.

An estimated 619 people were in serious condition, including 211 who were intubated. Around 70% of the serious cases were unvaccinated and 20% were vaccinated with only one dose. This was the lowest number in September.

A week ago, there were more than 700 serious cases. The death rate stood at 7,761meaning nearly 30 people were reported dead from COVID-19 between the morning and evening reports. Some 7,734 were reported dead by the Health Ministry on Thursday morning.

The vaccination campaign does appear to be on the uptick. Health Ministry data showed that close to 60,000 Israelis got their third shots on Wednesday, the highest number since September 9. Another 36,000 were given the booster on Thursday. It is likely, therefore, that the decrease in daily vaccinations over the past couple of weeks was due to the Jewish holidays, which ended Tuesday night. Close to 3.4 million Israelis have received a third shot.

Close to 10,000 Israelis received their first dose on Wednesday, the highest number in September.

Finally, Bennett met Thursday with Health Ministry officials ahead of the cabinet meeting that is supposed to take place on Sunday. The Prime Ministers Office said that at the meeting the joint work arrangements were sharpened, and various issues were discussed.

The prime minister and health minister emphasized in the conversation that they attached great importance to the position of the professionals, even when it differs from the position of the decision-makers, the statement said.

Visit link:

530 students confirmed as infected with coronavirus - The Jerusalem Post

It’s time Israel got serious to tackle the Iran threat – opinion – The Jerusalem Post

Posted By on October 2, 2021

Heres the good news: unless something extreme and dramatic happens, we will not be seeing Israeli F-35s or F-15s taking off in the next couple of years to attack Irans nuclear facilities.

This might seem contradictory, but it is not. Iran remains the threat it has been for 20 years, constantly straddling the nuclear threshold while toying with the West. Its strategy has remained the same: advance its program while trying to pay the lowest price possible. Something like a dance one step forward and another backward, and vice versa.

cnxps.cmd.push(function () { cnxps({ playerId: '36af7c51-0caf-4741-9824-2c941fc6c17b' }).render('4c4d856e0e6f4e3d808bbc1715e132f6'); });

Here is another piece of bad news: Israel does not currently have an effective military plan in place against Irans nuclear installations. The good news there is that in the near future, all is expected to change.

The fact is that Netanyahus strategy failed. The Israeli defense establishment pretty much agrees that while the 2015 nuclear deal, the JCPOA, was a bad pact, convincing Donald Trump to withdraw from it in 2018 did not achieve the desired result. Not only did Iran not cave to the sanctions nor return to the negotiating table, it insisted that if America pulled out of the deal, it could also violate it.

That it has. Iran currently has about five tons of low-enriched uranium, 85 kg enriched to 20% fissile purity, and another 10 kg enriched to 60 kg. Under the JCPOA, Iran is not supposed to have more than just a couple of hundred kilos of low-enriched uranium.

According to Military Intelligence, Iran could decide to take all of that low-enriched uranium and use it, within two months, to create enough fissionable material for a nuclear weapon, what is referred to as SQ a significant quantity.

In IDF simulations, such a move is referred to as a declaration of war, but it does not mean that Israel will need to go to war immediately. Even with a SQ of military-grade uranium, Iran would still need to take the gas and turn it into uranium metal, a highly complicated process that together with assembling a warhead installed on a ballistic missile that could reach Israel would take at least two years.

The problem is that Israel fell behind. In 2010 and 2012, Israel had a plan in place to attack Irans nuclear facilities. It might not have been perfect or foolproof, but there was a plan.

Squadrons of the Air Force were trained and prepared. Pilots knew their targets and how they would get there. When the JCPOA, as bad as it was, came into existence, Israel shelved the attack plans.

While it had its problems, everyone in Israel knew including the deals greatest opponent, Netanyahu that with the nuke deal in place, the military operation was now off the table.

But like at the gym, when you build up muscle, and muscle memory, you have to maintain it. Pilots have to keep training, munitions have to undergo maintenance, and budgets have to be allocated.

When it seemed like the JCPOA was working, a decision was made in the government to stop those preparations. It was even brought to the security cabinet and approved by Netanyahu, as part of the IDFs previous multi-year plan, called Gideon.

That seemed fine for a few years. Tehran continued its support of terrorism, but for the most part stuck to the deal. While the IDF still needed to be vigilant and watch Irans every move, it was able to invest its money elsewhere. As a result, the flexed muscle the attack plan against Iran was set aside.

But when Trump left the deal and Iran violated it as well, Israel did not respond accordingly. That should have been the wake-up call. But it wasnt. Israel didnt reinvest the necessary funds to get its attack plan sharpened for a possible strike.

In the IDF, officers blame this on what they refer to as the perfect storm Irans violations happening alongside the beginning of Israels four-election cycle. This meant no state budget, which meant there was no way for the IDF to again prepare an attack option.

Today, with a budget on track to being approved in the Knesset, those plans can once again advance. They are also no longer the same as they were in 2012. Iran has had time to reinforce its nuclear facilities and to bolster its defenses. This presents challenges, but dont forget that Israels technology has also improved. Israel did not have even one F-35 fighter jet with stealth capabilities in 2012. Today it has a fleet of 30.

Using the budget as an excuse for why the attack plan has fallen to the side is a bit populistic. During the nearly three years without a state budget, the IDF knew how to obtain extra funds, and how to divert money from any project deemed less important to others deemed more critical.

If Israels generals felt that a sword was being held to their neck by Iran, are we to honestly believe that the lack of a state budget is what held them back? A transition government was able to allocate billions of shekels to help Israelis get through the economic hardship brought on by COVID-19. Could it not have done the same if there was an emergency with Iran?

Naturally they could have, which means they didnt feel a sense of urgency. Politicians might use Iran to express a sense of urgency or to put down one of their adversaries, but that populism does not always match the genuine nature of the threat.

While Iran is without doubt Israels greatest threat and potentially even an existential one, we cannot ignore that it is also used for political purposes when convenient by politicians seeking to attack one another, or by the army to squeeze a bit more money out of state coffers.

Israels strategic predicament was evident in Bennetts speech at the United Nations on Monday. While he said that Israels patience has run out, and that words alone will not stop Iran, he did not come out strongly against American efforts to return to the JCPOA, nor outline a clear plan of his own on what Israel will do when diplomacy fails.

Was the lack of a clear threat due to an understanding that Israels military option is not yet ready, or because Bennett did not want to be seen undermining the Biden administrations efforts to reach a deal?

The answer seems to be somewhere in the middle, which is why Israel is currently focused on two parallel efforts: getting the military ready, and trying to convince the White House to present its own credible military threat.

Only those options, combined with tough sanctions, will stand a chance at getting the Iranians to stop, according to the IDF. And if all else fails, plans will be ready within the near future for whatever might be looming on the horizon.

***

On Monday morning, my brother-in-law Moshe Bina passed away.

Moshe was the oldest of my wife, Chayas, siblings. And his life was too short: he was 49, a husband to Rena, and a father to six beautiful children.

Books could be written about Moishie, as he was known in the family, the perfect example of what it meant to be devoutly religious with feet firmly on the ground.

Moshe was a top international tax lawyer in Tel Aviv, but never missed a day of learning, finishing the entire Talmud a few years ago. He attended minyan at shul every morning, but never missed a workout with his cycling group.

He was hands-on with life, with everything he did, someone who loved his family, his country and his people.

You know the kind of person to whom Im referring. He was the guy you could call in the middle of the night, the guy who would drop what he was doing to come pick you up because your car broke down. The guy who would make sure the event you were planning would go off without a hitch; the guy who would never miss an opportunity to man the barbeque at the family picnic.

On Monday afternoon during the burial, I was standing on the road just below the gravesite when a car pulled up. The window rolled down and an older woman asked who was the rabbi being buried. I didnt understand.

What rabbi?

Its not a rabbi who died? she asked. It must be a rabbi since why else would so many people be here?

Its not a rabbi, I told her, acknowledging the massive crowd that came to pay their last respects. Its my brother-in-law, Moshe Bina.

The woman would not let go. But why so many people? Who was he?

She wanted to know something that I could not put into words. The gathered crowd didnt come for a rabbi or for some famous politician. They came because Moshe was special, and in his modest, unique way, had showed people how they too could make their lives just a little better.

It was an honor to have known Moshe and to have him in our lives. We will miss him.

Read the original here:

It's time Israel got serious to tackle the Iran threat - opinion - The Jerusalem Post

Demand for a safe room spiked during the latest Israel-Gaza war. But how much does it cost? – Haaretz

Posted By on October 2, 2021

At the height of Operation Guardian of the Walls last May, real estate websites saw a marked rise in demand for rental apartments with safe rooms, or in buildings with protected areas on each floor. This shift in rental preferences, a dynamic market responsive to external events, brought into focus the fact that more than two million Israelis do not have a reinforced-concrete safe room. In the absence of a comprehensive government solution to this problem, many people are trying to create such a room on their own. In practice, and particularly in older buildings, this is a very challenging task.

Tenants in an apartment building that was built without such rooms before 1990, when they became mandatory, will need the agreement of 60 percent of apartment owners, says practical engineer Daphna Auerbach, a partner in Auerbach Halevy Architects. Although this is a lower threshold than the one required for other construction additions, even this is not always easy to attain. People living in their own single-family homes can build a safe room without having to take into account neighbors; all thats required is a building permit from the local authority. Another challenge that might arise, even if all the neighbors are on board, is engineering problems at the site. The safe room has to be anchored in the buildings foundations, with access into the building or to ground level, and this entails expensive and complex engineering work. In such cases, its sometimes preferable to use the national plan for fortifying buildings against earthquakes (called Tama 38), where construction strengthens the entire building, says Auerbach.

Exceeding building limits

Many older buildings have no safe rooms or safe areas on each floor, and even when there is a shelter in the basement, it takes too long for tenants living on the upper floors to reach it. Many shelters are in disrepair, having been turned into storage space for bikes and toys, which make them unpleasant places to stay during an emergency. This is one of the reasons people now want to build a safe room inside their apartments. Architect Boaz Snir, the owner of Boaz Snir Architects, explains why there is some advantage to adding a safe room in an existing building. For safe rooms, as opposed to other additions, one can exceed the buildings boundaries, something which greatly improves the ability to draw up building plans. Planning must take into consideration the buildings boundaries so that the planning does not cut into tenants parking spaces, for example. Snir notes that a safe room is therefore usually built on the sides or back of a building, not on the side facing the street.

Adding a safe room is very important and empowering, continues Snir. The extension fortifies the building against earthquakes and makes it more durable. Planning a safe room should involve an architect and orderly construction plans, with tests conducted before the work begins, in order to ascertain if the ground can stand up to the planned additions. He estimates that the cost of adding a safe room is 100,000 shekels ($31,000). This includes a door and window that meet the building code, air ducts and an apartment-wide filter system. This doesnt include the cost of building permits and fees for the designers (another 20,000 shekels). The process can take up to one year, depending on the complexity of the area and the number of safe rooms being added to an existing building.

How does it work in practice? Snir describes the process: After getting the tenants consent, the projects feasibility must be examined with an architect and construction expert. They examine whether the ground and the building itself can withstand the addition. After their approval, preliminary planning can begin, looking at different options that tenants who want the extension can agree on. After that, plans must be submitted to the municipality, and preliminary approval is obtained. Following that, the process of obtaining the final permit can begin. This process can take between a year and a year and a half. After the last round of fighting in Gaza, some cities have shortened the process, cutting it to a few months, says Snir.

Snir says theres another new phenomenon of building common safe areas on each floor instead of individual safe rooms. This applies mainly to new buildings containing small apartments or to older buildings in which a Tama 38 renovation is being done. In a small 2-room apartment, its not convenient to use the living room as a safe room, he says. A common area on each floor solves this problem. Rooms in small apartments are built as regular rooms, and the safe area is shared by several apartments. In buildings going through the Tama 38 process, even if there is a common shelter in the basement, shared safe rooms may be added on each floor so that people can reach them faster when needed. These common rooms are more spacious than a safe room in an apartment and include a better air filter and fire extinguishing systems, but it does take longer to get there compared to a safe room in your own apartment. This is a factor one has to consider, depending on the apartments location relative to the threat people face. Moreover, Snir believes that such common spaces tend to become storage areas, which makes them unavailable for protecting tenants in times of emergency.

Blurring the safe room look

Even after adding a safe room or buying a new apartment with a safe room, the room itself is not always pleasant looking or inviting as a living area. The door and blast window are made of thick iron in order to seal off the room during an emergency, but in normal times they are an eyesore. In some new apartments, this is sometimes solved by adding an extra doorframe, which allows an additional door that opens into the room. Architect Shira Muskal, co-owner of Halel Architects and Interior Design, recommends that people make sure an extra doorframe is installed before buying a new apartment. One can cover the door with wallpaper in accordance with the design of the room, as well as hanging a soft, floor-to-ceiling curtain over the window, giving the room a tall look. For example, a Roman curtain hanging from the ceiling gives every window more attractive rectangular proportions.

In order to be ready for emergencies, Muskal recommends furnishing the safe room with low furniture, so that in case theres an explosion nearby, no one sitting there will be hurt, she says. Furthermore, she recommends not overloading the room with unnecessary furniture and decorative items in order to give the room a more spacious look. If the room is not used regularly as a bedroom, you can place a cushioned, soft and comfortable sofa across from the door, so that entering the room is a soothing experience, opening up the space. You can use a sofa that opens into a bed, so that it has a dual purpose as a play room, work room or guest room as needed.

According to Muskal, in many apartments, the safe room is used for other purposes such as for storage, as a closet room or as a home office. Its not legally prohibited, but its important to know that according to Home Command regulations, no changes are allowed in plumbing or in the ability to seal off the room. Above all, its crucial to leave it as a protected safe space that can be used in times of emergency.

Interior designer Ariella Azaria Berkovich explains that many people erroneously think that you cant drill holes in a safe room. Professionals can tell you where you can drill holes for the right dowels, using them as anchors for hanging up pictures or decorations in your safe room, she says. One can also move electric sockets. In any case, she says, the safe room should be connected to all forms of communication networks, concentrating all the media in a closet that can also contain other essentials one may need in an emergency.

Azaria Berkovich suggests covering most or all of the safe rooms window with a tall, fancy bed headboard. This way, you can blur the dominant safe room look and convert it into a fancy room. The absence of external lighting can be compensated for with complementary artificial lighting that provides strong but pleasant light. If doing without a window is not an option, I design the space so that the eye is drawn toward other elements in the room, not to the window and door, such as by adding wallpaper, a large bookcase that fits the space, textile elements and accessories with a presence.

Read more:

Demand for a safe room spiked during the latest Israel-Gaza war. But how much does it cost? - Haaretz

Israel Air Forces relative failure in Yom Kippur War comes to light – Haaretz

Posted By on October 2, 2021

Nearly 1,000 books, a cautious estimate, have been published about the 1973 Yom Kippur War, more than half of them in Hebrew. Prof. Uri Bar-Joseph is the author of two of the most important.

The Watchman Fell Asleep, whose English-language version came out in 2005, is the classic account of the history of the surprise to Israels intelligence community at the start of the war. The Angel: The Egyptian Spy Who Saved Israel (English 2016) adds what was banned for publication about Israel's spy among Egypts leaders, Ashraf Marwan, and about how he tried to warn Israel of the impending war.

In the past year and a half, Bar-Joseph researched a subject that has drawn surprisingly little attention from historians of the war: the role of the air force in the campaign. The results are found in a trenchant new Hebrew-language book whose title translates as A War of Its Own: The Air Force in the Yom Kippur War. The air force chief during the war, Benny Peled, gets the same critical and thorough treatment that Military Intelligence chief Eli Zeira got in the two earlier books.

Lets put it this way. If youre ever responsible for a major security snafu, make sure Bar-Joseph doesnt write a book about you.

In the years before the 1973 war, about half the defense budget was invested in the air force, which emerged from the 1967 Six-Day War basking in glory. But after the 73 war, contrary to the air forces splendid tradition, not even an internal investigation was undertaken. Only one researcher, Shmuel Gordon (who flew a Phantom jet in the war), authored a study, the Hebrew-language Thirty Hours in October, about the air force at the beginning of the war.

In 2013, on the wars 40th anniversary, a meeting took place between the current air force headquarters staff and the 1973 headquarters officers. Peled was no longer alive but his spirit, one participant says, still hovered in the room. His subordinates were afraid to speak openly.

Bar-Joseph told Haaretz on Thursday that in his research he discovered an exceptional air force that suffered in the war from failed management and a series of mistaken decisions. The air forces system of command is highly centralized. The control center in fact controls every movement of a plane in the air. In these circumstances, the forces commander wields vast influence.

Peled was very assertive but lacked operational experience compared to his predecessor, Motti Hod. He refused to listen to other opinions or criticism from the people under him. He was fixated on destroying the Arabs air forces, as was done in 1967. The commanders of the bases sat with him in meetings every evening. It was clear to them that mistakes were being made, but few of them dared speak out.

The result, Bar-Joseph says, was an operational conception that after two days of combat pushed aside the preoccupation with the enemys surface-to-air missile systems, which were the major obstacle to the air forces aid to the ground troops. Instead, the focus was on the Egyptian airfields as a main target for attacks by the Phantom squadrons. Those forays produced limited results, while the threat posed to the Israeli rear by the Egyptian planes was negligible (because they had to cross the Sinai Peninsula), and the danger they posed to the Israeli planes was limited.

Bar-Joseph quotes an astonishing conversation between Peled; the chief of staff of the Israel Defense Forces, David Elazar; and two other senior air force officers at midday on October 18, 1973, 12 days into the war. Elazar said bitterly: For some reason I believed until now that in a war all efforts should be concentrated in joint, active efforts, and that we should spare our forces regarding everything secondary . Today Im learning from you that in the air force it works differently and that the main thing is to deal with the periphery.

In the background was the IDFs crossing to the western side of the Suez Canal. After three days of fighting at the bridgehead, the IDF had lost nearly 600 combat troops and was having a hard time advancing. Elazar expected the air force to focus on attacking the surface-to-air missile batteries in the area, to help him assist the ground forces. But Elazar discovered that Peled had chosen to bomb Qantara to the north, a less relevant sector. Six planes were lost in that raid.

According to Bar-Joseph, Elazar didnt dictate operational efforts to Peled. He disagreed with him sometimes, but he didnt run him. That might be due to personal dynamics between them, but it was also the result a 20-year operational culture in which the air force enjoyed full autonomy in the IDF. I worry that the air force enjoys a similar degree of freedom today.

In another jolting episode in the book, Peled sometimes deliberately reported a lower number of able planes and also lower estimates of the number of planes that had been hit and were quickly being repaired. But Peled apparently knew the real figures. He later explained that he noticed poor morale among his General Staff colleagues, who were reluctant to launch a counterattack over the canal, so he tried to spur them to act quickly before the planes that would enable that crossing ran out.

Some of the conclusions in the book are relevant today, Bar-Joseph believes. Today the leadership and the public recoil from land battles and the casualties they entail. At the same time, there is a strong belief in the air forces ability to cope with the threats, he says.

The biggest threat in the next war will be the firing of missiles and rockets at the civilian rear. After one day of combat dozens of buildings in the center of the country will be badly hit. The air force is perceived as a panacea for that.

The public expects us to inflict extremely heavy damage on Hezbollah in response which is logical with these airstrikes stopping most of the firing at the rear. A vast gap regarding expectations will emerge. In reality, it will be impossible to deal with each launcher, and then will come the disappointment. Thats a point that also has to be taken into account when Israel takes offensive steps that could bring a war closer.

Another question relates to decision-making under pressure, something the current political and military leadership has no experience with. As Bar-Joseph puts it, The IDF of 1973 was an excellent army, highly experienced. A tank commander in the 11th Reserve Brigade had more combat experience than the chief of staff and the major generals today. The same holds for the gap between Golda Meir and [minister and adviser] Israel Galili and the experience of Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid. Theyll have to make extremely difficult decisions while casualties are being inflicted, and all of it under a hysteria offensive on social media.

This week the defense minister and chief of staff chose Tomer Bar as the next air force chief. Not that Maj. Gen. Bar needs this recommendation from a newspaper, but Bar-Josephs book seems to be required reading before he takes over one of the most important positions for Israels security.

The American way

Amid the dispute that flared up again this week between the political leaders and the Health Ministry over coronavirus policy, lets have a look at whats happening in the United States. The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Mark Milley, was grilled in a Senate hearing about the Americans chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan. He admitted that the event was a strategic failure.

Milley isnt necessarily the paragon of an impartial public servant. A little more than a year ago he was lambasted for accompanying President Donald Trump on a bizarre visit to a Washington church after anti-Trump demonstrators were violently dispersed near the White House.

He later apologized, and the books published this summer about Trumps wacky presidency contain plenty of revelations of unusual actions by Milley during the presidents final year in office. It seems the general, who undoubtedly was a major source for some of the books, breached many of the accepted rules of behavior in his efforts to protect the armed forces from the stain that marked such a deviant presidency.

In Israel, the U.S. chief of staffs comments remind us of the COVID dispute, and further back, the disagreement at the end of the 90s between Ehud Barak and the IDF High Command over the prime ministers decision to withdraw from southern Lebanon. (Though today most of those generals admit he was right.)

Milley was asked about the confrontation with Joe Biden over the withdrawal from Afghanistan. The president doesnt have toagree with that advice.He doesnt have to make thosedecisions just because weregenerals, he said in reply to a question by Sen. Tom Cotton, a Republican. This country doesnt want generals figuring out what orders were going to accept and do or not.

Milley commented on top officers qualms about the order to evacuate Afghanistan immediately while leaving behind many people who had served the United States loyally. According to Milley, it would be an incredible act of political defiance for a commissioned officer to resign just because my advice was not taken. He added, My dad didnt get a chance to resign at Iwo Jima. And those kids there at Abbey Gate [in Kabul], they dont get a choice to resign.

You can say plenty of bad things about the Americans, but its hard not to admire the relations between the president, the Senate and the armed forces in their democracy as seen in the hearing and the exchange between the general and the senator. Here, too, it seems, Israel can still learn from the United States.

Continue reading here:

Israel Air Forces relative failure in Yom Kippur War comes to light - Haaretz


Page 641«..1020..640641642643..650660..»

matomo tracker