Page 761«..1020..760761762763..770780..»

Jonathan P. Baird: A rise in anti-Semitic incidents is not the answer to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict – Concord Monitor

Posted By on June 25, 2021

In New York Citys Time Square, a group of men punched, kicked and pepper-sprayed a 29-year-old Jewish man who was wearing a yarmulke. The group was shouting anti-Semitic words.

In New York Citys Upper West Side, a Jewish man headed to Trader Joes to buy food for the Sabbath. A group of teens followed him saying, Yarmulke. I want to take that yarmulke. I want to hit him in his head and take that yarmulke. That Jewish baby-killer.

In Brooklyn, a different group of males harassed Orthodox Jews getting ready for Sabbath. The group shouted, Free Palestine, kill all the Jews. The group banged on locked synagogue doors and when they could not get in they broke off the mirror on a nearby parked car. A little later, the group chased people perceived as Jews with a baseball bat and put a 17-year-old in a choke hold.

In Skokie, Illinois, someone shattered a window in a synagogue.

In Arizona, police are investigating someone spray painting a swastika and an anti-Semitic slur on the door of a Tucson synagogue. This was the second synagogue in the city vandalized recently.

In Los Angeles, pro-Palestinian demonstrators attacked Jewish diners at a sushi restaurant.

All these episodes happened in the wake of Mays military conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. During that fighting in May, the Anti-Defamation League tracked a spike in anti-Semitic incidents in the United States, including assaults, vandalism, harassment and hate speech. On Twitter, there were more than 17,000 tweets using variations of the phrase Hitler was right between May 7 to 14.

It would appear that Jews are being blamed worldwide for the violence in Gaza. As in the U.S., Jews in Europe have also seen an uptick in anti-Semitic incidents. Anti-Semites use human rights abuses by the Israeli state against Palestinians as cover for hatred of Jews everywhere.

As a Jewish American, I am not responsible for the actions of the Israeli state. And for the record, I am a progressive and an anti-fascist. I oppose racism, sexism and class oppression. I support LGBTQ rights. I have opposed the Netanyahu government and the occupation, but in this instance, I do not think a persons position on Israel and the Palestinians is the issue.

In the American Jewish community, there is a wide range of views about Israel, but that is an entirely separate matter from anti-Semitism in the United States.

I am among those progressives who were jolted by Charlottesville in 2017. The sight of neo-Nazis with their tiki torches chanting, Jews will not replace us was bracing and a wake-up call. The 2018 Pittsburgh synagogue shooting reinforced my feelings.

Progressives, along with all others on the political spectrum, have underestimated the anti-Semitic threat, and I think that comes out of a weak historical understanding of both anti-Semitism and fascism.

Anti-Semitic hatred is uniquely deep-seated. It has been justifiably called the longest hatred. Think crusades, inquisitions, pogroms, the blood libel and the Holocaust. The body count is enormous, but there is a tendency to downplay the danger because of the relative economic success of American Jews. The myth that all Jews are richfigures prominently in the anti-Semitic playbook.

The truth has some complexity. While American Jews as a whole represent the highest-earning religious group in the U.S., more than half of American Jews earn less than $99,000 per year with 31% earning less than $49,000 per year. Contrary to the stereotype, many Jews do not have much money.

The stereotype that Jews are rich and greedy has a long historical background. Going back to the Middle Ages, Jews had restrictions placed on their economic activity and they were sometimes prohibited from owning land. Ruling classes set up Jews in intermediate positions between those with real power and those without. It was convenient for ruling classes to place Jews in positions where they could be a focus for popular anger that might otherwise be directed at the ruling class.

For over 1,500 years, the church helped generate a popular culture of hatred toward Jews. Anti-Jewish legislation adopted by the church became the law of the land throughout Christian Europe. Jewish-Christian marriages were forbidden, except in the case of conversion by the Jewish party. Jewish property rights were narrowed. Jews were barred from practicing law and Jews were prevented from testifying against a Christian. In some countries, Jews were forcibly baptized or expelled.

The character Shylock in Shakespeares The Merchant of Venice comes to mind. As an unscrupulous money-lender, Shylock depicted the stereotype of Jewish greed. Jews, like the Rothschilds or George Soros, are still imagined to control the worlds financial systems. Cartoons of grotesque, fat, Jewish bankers running the planet are epidemic. Conspiracy theories live off half-baked ideas and images.

In her podcast, the comedian Sarah Silverman has directly confronted the anti-Semitic mythology that connects Jews and money. She says, The conceit that Jews are rich is why the Holocaust happened. That was the idea they were pushing that got people on board with Nazism.

I think there is truth in Silvermans perspective. The Nazis played on the thousand-year hatred that had religious and economic roots. Scapegoating was central to their project. Progressives who write off anti-Semitism in the hierarchy of racism are missing why it remains dangerous. Nazis did not ultimately care whether a Jewish person was rich or not. Rich Jews ended up on the trains to Auschwitz, Sobibor, Dachau and Treblinka, too.

Interestingly, Sarah Silverman is from New Hampshire. She lived in Bedford. She described on her podcast how growing up she was used to hearing the phrase, Jew them down. In high school, when she was doing comedy she tells how she was performing, getting laughs and she did a quick turn to serious. She spits out, Jew is not a verb. It is me, your friend.After that, she said among her friends she never again heard Jew used as a verb.

Jew-hatred is like other racial hatred or hatred of gay people. It is profoundly irrational. Progressives who do not integrate an understanding of anti-Semitism along with other racism have a superficial grasp of the forms of oppression. They are also not listening closely to the neo-Nazis and white supremacists.

The white power movement sees the Jews as an all-powerful force in the background, controlling events and using other minorities and immigrants as pawns in their game. They do not see the Jews as white. They see the Jews as the puppet masters, pursuing white genocide and replacement of white people by minorities.

In acknowledging anti-Semitism, I would recognize that in America the history of oppression against African-Americans, Native Americans and Latinx people has been far worse. That is undisputed, but it does not minimize Jew-hatred.

America has a strong First Amendment tradition of religious tolerance. Compared to Europe, anti-Semites have had less success here. Still, Jews need allies who will stand with them and oppose anti-Semitism. Passive or indifferent bystanders do not stop perpetrators. Recent experience provides evidence that a threat remains. As with other racism, anti-Semitism must be vigorously opposed.

(Jonathan Baird lives in Wilmot.)

View post:
Jonathan P. Baird: A rise in anti-Semitic incidents is not the answer to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict - Concord Monitor

Boyertown School Board still grappling candidate’s comments on race – The Mercury

Posted By on June 25, 2021

BOYERTOWN Residents continue to publicly ask the school board to jointly denounce the racially insensitive comments made by a candidate for the board, but no vote has been taken as of the June 22 meeting.

At issue are social media posts made by Kirstin Lord, 21, of Earl Township who won the Republican nomination for one of two seats open in the November election for Region 1, which represents Bally and Bechtelsville boroughs, and Colebrookdale, Earl and Washington townships.

Lord's friend and neighbor, incumbent Ruth A. Dierolf, a 16-year veteran school board member, won the Democratic primary for Region 1 and was the second vote getter in the Republican primary.

Incumbent Melody McWherter of Earl Township, currently the board vice president, and Nicole Zelcs of Colebrookdale Township, were the other two candidates in the Region 1 primary election.

Trey Yarnall is the 26-year-old Boyertown Area High School graduate who started the online petition calling on Lord to be removed from the board if she wins the election; a petition which has, to date, collectedmore than 5,000 signatures.

On May 22, Yarnall posted a composite Facebook post showing various comments Lord made as she engaged in back and forth arguments online.

Within the text of those exchanges, Lord referred to Black people as "colored," and defended the word's use when informed that term is "offensive."

"Yet 'Blacks' can call us white crackers? How is that any different?" Lord replied in an online exchange.

In another exchange, Lord wrote "lately seeing the news, maybe they need to wake up and realize the encouragement of looting, rioting and violence toward innocent people is unnecessary and creating a stereotype for themselves as well as other colored individuals. So in a way, they are bringing it on themselves honestly."

In another reply, Lord wrote "Also the 'N' word simply just means a 'black or dark-skinned person' so if they get offended by being called that well that suckssf than for them i guess. That's what you told me anyway right?"

Lord also commented under a photo of a protestor holding a sign, "Black lives matter? What about us white people? Nah, we just don't matter."

In a May 27 article, the Reading Eagle reportedthat Lord said she has no intention of getting out of the race, and that Lord "apologized for the comments."

Zelcs has dropped out of the race, but has now twice asked the school board to condemn the comments Lord made on social media.

The first time she spoke was at the May 25 board meeting and the board hesitated to let her speak because she had been a candidate.

"This is political speech, this is not a political body," board member James Brophy said as Zelcs began, in apparent violation of the board rule which prohibits board members from responding to speakers.

When Zelcs noted she had lost the election and is not running in November, Brophy responded "you're campaigning for a write-in campaign." When Zelcs asked School Board President Brian Hemingway if Brophy was allowed, under board rules, to address her, he replied, "I am interested in what Mr. Brophy has to say."

What followed was a recess and reference to board solicitor Jeffrey Sultanik, who said the only policy that applies to a member of the public making a political speech relies on the discretion of the board president. Hemingway allowed Zelcs to speak at the May 25 meeting.

"Do we teach our children hate and bigotry, or love and diversity?" Zelcs asked.

Also speaking at the May 25 meeting was board member Lisa Hogan who said "racism is not political" and asked the board to issue a statement "condemning hate speech of any kind."

Zelcs was among several speakers who addressed the matter again at the June 22 meeting.

Nora Filowitz said Lord's election continues the impression "that Boyertown is full of racists and hate. Whether you agree with that or not, those statements raise some red flags for someone who will oversee decisions in our school district."

She noted that in 2006 Boyertown became a "No Place for Hate" school district, a designation certified each year by the Anti-Defamation League. That designation was bestowed again in May.

Saying that "silence is endorsement," Filowitz said refusing to condemn Lord's comments "will undo all that our community" has done to move away from hate.

"If you cannot, as adults, do the right thing, how can we expect our children to?" Filowitz asked.

Jon Emeigh, who is a school board candidate in the November election for Region 3, said the phrase "'One Boyertown' is dead. I guess for certain board members, 'No Place for Hate' does not apply when spoken by someone they support for political office."

"Once again," Emeigh said, "as has happened before, our town is being embarrassed over race issues, but I guess certain board members are beyond embarrassment."

"I worry about what we as a district, and community, truly stand for," resident Kristy Hart told the board Tuesday. "I ask you to denounce her words and stand up against racism."

Acknowledging Hemingway's statements that the school board does not determine who sits there, the voters do, Hart said "the community makes the choice, but you have the voice to lead the community the way that they need to go."

"As always, I denounce racism and I would ask us, as a board, to make a stand against it," McWherter said as the June 22 meeting wound down.

Hogan again said, "I call on the board to denounce racism and hate speech."

Board member Brandon Foose noted that the U.S. government recently made Juneteenth, a celebration of the news reaching Texas that enslaved people had been declared freed, a federal holiday.

"And I think that's a good time to rededicate our institutions as a country and as a community to the principles of empathy and inclusion and always strive to do a better job that we actually meet the ideals that this country was established on."

No formal motion or vote regarding Lord's comments was made or taken.

The Reading Eagle contributed to this report.

See the original post:
Boyertown School Board still grappling candidate's comments on race - The Mercury

Five-star Palestine come from behind to beat Comoros – FIFA.com

Posted By on June 25, 2021

24 Jun 2021

Palestine beat Comoros to book Arab Cup ticket

After going down early they scored five unanswered goals

Palestine will meet Morocco, Saudi Arabia and Jordan in Group C

Palestine came from behind to defeat Comoros 5-1 and book their place at the FIFA Arab Cup 2021. They will join Morocco, Saudi Arabia and Jordan in a competitive-looking Group C at the end of the year.

Comoros started brightly at the Jassim Bin Hamad Stadium. Within five minutes Les Coelacantes were on the scoresheet thanks to Moussa Djoumoi, who latched on to the end of a flicked through pass from Mohamed M'Changama.

Palestine slowly started growing into the game, and in the 34th minute they had their equaliser. Layth Kharoub was the most alert in Comoros' penalty area and he poked in from close range after Moyadh Ousseni failed to deal with the free-kick.

Eight minutes later Oday Dabbagh produced a moment of individual brilliance and rocketed a left-footed shot past a helpless Ousseni.

After the half-time break, Palestine did not take their foot off the gas and continued their dominance. Palestine extended their lead with arguably the pick of the bunch as Dabbagh curled in a Luka Modric-esque, outside-of-the-boot cross for Tamer Seyam, who made a lung-bursting run to the near post before glancing in a header off the far post and in.

In the 71st minute it was a case of dj vu as Dabbagh broke free on the right wing again before putting a pass on a plate for Seyam to score from close range and make it 4-1.

Ten minutes later Islam Batran put the icing on the cake as he took advantage of some slack defending before scoring Palestine's fifth and ensuring they will participate in the Arab Cup at the end of the year.

Excerpt from:

Five-star Palestine come from behind to beat Comoros - FIFA.com

Labour could lose a by-election over the issue of Palestine – The Economist

Posted By on June 25, 2021

GEORGE GALLOWAY is sitting in Starbucks, close to the abandoned nightclub that serves as his campaign base. Fighting Labour is our number one target, he declares. An MP for Labour before he was expelled in 2003, Mr Galloway is a political opportunist with a habit of causing trouble at tricky moments. He handed Labour surprise defeats in Bethnal Green and Bow in 2005, and Bradford West in 2012. On July 1st, standing in Batley and Spen for a new Workers Party of Britain (founded to defend the achievements of the USSR, China, Cuba etc), he may cause a third upset, albeit by splitting Labours vote rather than by winning himself.

Your browser does not support the

Enjoy more audio and podcasts on iOS or Android.

Labour has held the seat since 1997. The candidate, Kim Leadbeater, is the sister of Jo Cox, who was its MP until she was murdered in 2016 by a white-supremacist terrorist. Ms Leadbeaters energy, charisma and work for the foundation set up in her sisters memory are in her favour. But polling suggests rising support for the Conservatives. And much of Mr Galloways projected 6% vote share is likely to come from South-Asian Muslims who feel slighted and ignored by Labour.

The constituency is a complex mixture. The small, prosperous towns of Spen Valley largely vote Tory. Batley, by contrast, is an old mill town filled with working-class white and South-Asian Muslims. It is rundown, with many of the handsome sandstone buildings in the centre lying empty. Leave the centre, and cobbled streets give way to potholed tarmac. Locals complain about fly tipping, too few school places and the closure of Batley police station.

Such gripes usually harm incumbentsand Labour holds not just the constituency but also a plurality on the county council. Ms Leadbeater joined Labour only recently (she felt that party membership conflicted with her charity work), which may help neutralise the anti-incumbency effect. But it has also stirred resentments. Some local Muslims think a Labour candidate should have been chosen from among their communitys councillors. Some of those councillors are rumoured to be campaigning for Mr Galloway.

Inter-communal relations can be rocky. Residents, Muslim and non-Muslim alike, lament increasing self-segregation. Ms Cox was murdered by a white supremacist; far-right groups frequently demonstrate in the area and several are running in this election. In May a teacher at Batley Grammar School was forced into hiding by death threats after he showed a cartoon of the prophet Muhammad in a lesson on blasphemy. He is still in hiding.

Internal Labour politics do not help. Sir Keir Starmer, the partys leader, has tried to tackle the anti-Semitism that flourished under Jeremy Corbyn, his predecessor. But many of Batleys Muslims feel he has nothing to say about their grievances, or about Islamophobia. They are angered, too, by his refusal to condemn Israels recent bombing of Gaza.

All this is meat and drink to Mr Galloway, whose other pet cause, besides a fondness for anti-Western dictatorships, is Palestine. From 2012 to 2015 he was MP for nearby Bradford West, standing for the Respect Party, a coalition of far-left and Islamist groupuscules. He claims Muslims like him because he helped organise an aid convoy to Palestine in 2008-09, and more generally because of his pro-Palestinian stance and rhetoric.

Doubtless true, but Mr Galloway also evokes uglier sentiments. He once blamed a scandal on the New York-Tel Aviv axis of evil. Some of his supporters talk of the powerful lobbies that made Sir Keir party leader. Soon the words Jewish and Zionist are uttered, along with references to politicians selling their souls on the issue of Palestine.

Mr Galloway promises his supporters that a defeat for Labour in Batley and Spen will force Sir Keir to step down as party leader. That may be an exaggeration. But there is no doubt that another loss, after Labours shock defeat in a by-election in May in Hartlepool, which elected its first-ever Conservative MP, would seriously damage Sir Keir. Hartlepool was one of the Red Wall constituencies across the middle and north of England that used to vote Labour, but plumped for Brexit in 2016 and are now tilting Conservative.

That loss emphasised how hard it will be for Labour to keep both the northern, pro-Brexit working class and the southern, anti-Brexit graduates it needs to have any chance in a general election. Losing Batley and Spen would be a sign that a modest but important part of Labours multi-ethnic coalition is also at risk. In this constituency and perhaps others, Israel, Palestine and anti-Semitism may function like Brexit: as a wedge issue that prises off one group of traditional Labour voters, stirring up dangerous divisions in the process.

This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline "West Yorkshire Bank"

See the original post:

Labour could lose a by-election over the issue of Palestine - The Economist

Violence Against or Obstruction of Health Care in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt) in 2020 – occupied Palestinian territory – ReliefWeb

Posted By on June 25, 2021

In the early hours of December 27, 2020 Israeli military forces raided and attacked the Palestine Medical Complex in Ramallah city in the West Bank. Military vehicles were used to close and block two hospital entrances, while approximately five soldiers fired rubber-coated bullets, 20 tear gas canisters, and ten stun grenades in the hospitals yard. A hospital employee was shot by a rubber-coated bullet as he was leading patients away from the attack, and a seven-months pregnant woman was shot in her shoulder by a rubber bullet. A tear gas canister hit a Palestinian ambulance and damaged it.

OVERVIEW

The Safeguarding Health in Conflict Coalition (SHCC) identified 61 incidents of violence against or obstruction of health care in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt) in 2020, compared to 226 incidents in 2019. Health workers were injured or arrested and health facilities damaged in these incidents.

This factsheet is based on the dataset 2020 SHCC Health Care oPt Data, which is available for open-source access on the Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX).

Continued here:

Violence Against or Obstruction of Health Care in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt) in 2020 - occupied Palestinian territory - ReliefWeb

Opening a window of hope in Gaza – occupied Palestinian territory – ReliefWeb

Posted By on June 25, 2021

What does the project "Gaza Tech Women Lead" supported by ACT-members Dan Church Aid and Norwegian Church Aid in Gaza mean for young, well-educated women like Sara Al Massri?

There is a high unemployment and poverty rate among young women graduates in Palestine -- even in professions which are in high demand in other parts of the world, such as engineers and IT specialists. Therefore, ACT-members DanChurchAid/Norwegian Church Aid's joint country office in Palestine has worked through their local partner "Women Affairs Centre" (WAC) in Gaza which implemented the project "Gaza Tech Women Lead", promoting young women's employability through digital work.

One of the project's objectives is to enhance the technical skills and knowledge in freelancing among the targeted young women through a seven-month training and coaching programme every year. The technical training covers new trending tracks (like Laravel, iOS, Digital Marketing, Machine Learning, Flutter, Android, graphic design and so forth), and coaching and mentorship to support the young women in accessing effective digital entrepreneurship opportunities.

Willing to seize the chance

Sara Al Massri, a 28 year old computer systems engineer who graduated in 2015, participated at the programme. Today, she is a successful remote worker with the uMake coworking Space in Ramallah, and a freelance graphic designer.

"My path with graphic design began when I saw an advertisement on Facebook shared by WAC announcing the start of registration for the Gaza Tech Women Lead programme. Graphics are my passion. Since my childhood, I love colors, drawing and anything related to arts, so I applied and was accepted at the second turn", the young woman said. "I chose this specialization for different reasons: First of all, every type of business needs visuals to reach its customers, thus graphic design is necessary for any kind of commerce. Second, because it's my passion, and finally, I was determined to seize the chance and create something from scratch. Therefore, I am thankful to WAC for offering a real, practical topic which is useful and brings results in the worldwide labor market."

Sara got her first job in graphic design directly after finishing her technical training. It was on Upwork, a global work platform where everyday businesses of all sizes and independent talent from around the world meet. Soon after that, she received an Upwork skill certification, which means that she demonstrated competency in her field by passing a sample work review, evaluated by domain experts in her field.

Access to the global labor market

The successful graphic designer continued, "I knew WAC activities supporting women before, but the training I got was the first one for me with WAC. I learned the graphics programs from scratch (InDesign, Photoshop, Illustrator) and also acquired all the necessary freelancing skills that let me start with fewer problems on the freelancing platforms. We were eight participants in this training -- almost all of them IT-engineers. In the Gaza strip, it's hard to find a job in the local labor market which is full of graduates with high degrees like a master's. Freelancing or remote working is the only chance to get a qualified job in this area. Together with online applications, it opens up new opportunities for us and we can benefit from the global labor market. So, I decided to find a place for me outside the borders of Gaza, and the 'Gaza Tech Women Lead' program helped me to open the window of hope," Sara concluded.

Launch of a "Re-Startup Gaza"-Initiative

In the meantime, Sara is a full-time employee as a digital marketing coordinator. She works remotely with a co-working space based in the West Bank called uMake. After the recent Israel-Gaza conflict in May 2021, Startup Palestine which is powered by uMake launched a "Re-Startup Gaza" initiative that aims to support Gaza Startups, small businesses, entrepreneurs, and talents like freelancers or remote workers.

For the future, the young graphic designer wants to establish her own design agency and do work related to human rights as well as completing her high studies in human rights.

View post:

Opening a window of hope in Gaza - occupied Palestinian territory - ReliefWeb

Israels new government agrees on only one thing: Booting Netanyahu – Brookings Institution

Posted By on June 25, 2021

Seven months after the 1967 war, President Lyndon B. Johnson hosted Israels prime minister, Levi Eshkol, in Texas. Johnson asked Eshkol directly: What kind of Israel do you want? Israel officially rejected a return to the pre-war armistice lines, which it felt had helped produce the war. So what did it want instead? What borders and what citizenry did Eshkol envision? Eshkol replied, in the recounting of a minister he briefed: Mr. President I have a wall-to-wall coalition. [T]he government has decided not to decide until there is an Arab partner for negotiations. Unfortunately, I cannot tell you what kind of Israel I want!

The successors to Eshkol including the charismatic, polarizing, and longest-serving among them, Benjamin Netanyahu have all been confronted with versions of Johnsons question. As Netanyahu leaves office, perhaps for the last time, he leaves the nation wealthier, more powerful in some ways, and yet more divided than ever, and with no more of an answer as to what kind of Israel it wants.

Eshkols non-answer to Johnson was not only evasion. He was not, in fact, in a position to speak for Israel without the authorization of his cabinet. Prime ministers are not presidents, although Netanyahu often behaved as one. Prime ministers are, at least formally, first among equals in a cabinet that collectively governs the country and commands its armed forces. This will be especially the case for Naftali Bennett, Israels new prime minister, and Yair Lapid, the alternate prime minister and foreign minister, slated to become prime minister in 2023. Each man will have a veto on all major decisions in a coalition of no fewer than eight parties, spanning the full ideological spectrum, from hard right to hard left, and including an Arab party for the first time since the 1950s.

The upshot is that major moves on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, in any direction, will not be possible with this government. Seemingly modest developments, for better and for worse, could turn out to have major long-term effects.

Bennett is very hawkish on the issue, openly and consistently opposing a Palestinian state, but he is not alone. In 2017, he described to me how his once-far-right views had become mainstream in Israel, in the aftermath of the suicide bombings of the second intifada, which started in September 2000, and the rocket fire that intensified after Israels withdrawal from Gaza in 2005. He was an early proponent of annexation of Area C in the West Bank over 60 percent of the territory and saw elements of his plan incorporated not only into the official Netanyahu approach, but also into the Trump-Kushner plan of 2020. President Trump calls it a [Palestinian] state, said a senior Israeli official quoted in the Netanyahu-friendly newspaper Israel Hayom, but what the Trump administration proposed was a state in name only, more akin to the autonomy-on-steroids that Bennett had previously advocated.

Others on the right flank of the new government share many of these views. Gideon Saar, the incoming justice minister,told me in February that although annexation is off the table for now given Israels commitment as part of the Abraham Accords with the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain it remains a strategic goal. Finance Minister Avigdor Libermans views have been more complex, and he nominally supported a two-state solution of sorts, but no one would mistake him for a dove.

Nonetheless, Netanyahu and his camp have attacked Bennett for forming a leftist government. Alternate prime minister Lapid supports a Palestinian state, as he told merecently, although he rejects perhaps as an opening position the division of Jerusalem. Lapid sounds like, and genuinely holds the views of, a centrist Israeli with whom President Bidens Washington would be very comfortable. He hopes to rebuild bridges to U.S. Democrats, woefully damaged during the Netanyahu years, and, domestically, he espouses a liberal, secularist vision. This entails curbing the influence of religious authorities on personal affairs and the power of the Haredi (ultra-Orthodox) parties, now out of government, which the Modern Orthodox Bennett could go along with but only to a degree. Lapid leads the largest faction in the new government he himself put together, earning recognition as the new leader of the center-left.

Alongside Lapid are other parties that support compromise to varying degrees. These run from Benny Gantzs Blue and White to Labor, with a new and prominent leader, Merav Michaeli, to the leftist Meretz, led by Nitzan Horowitz. Where Bennett and Saar reject a Palestinian state, Michaeli and Horowitz reject the idea of annexation or the continuation of occupation for equally fervent ideological and security reasons. They will, in real terms, cancel each other out, both because of the Bennett-Lapid mutual vetoes and because the relatively dovish camp in the coalition will represent at least 42 Knesset seats of the coalitions 61.

Most interesting, perhaps, is the inclusion of Raam, an Islamic party representing Palestinian citizens of Israel. Raam surprised everyone by seeking to join a coalition Netanyahus or Bennett and Lapids to promote domestic policy in favor of its constituents, rather than foreign policy on behalf of the Palestinian cause. Raams priorities are indicative of the governments as a whole.

The Bennett-Lapid agenda on the Palestinian issue is clear: It has none. The new coalition is built to tackle completely different issues, outlining a far-reaching domestic agenda that starts with two simple goals: replacing Netanyahu and ending Israels governance crisis.

The severity of the governance crisis should not be underestimated. In but one example, Netanyahu has blocked the passage of a state budget his own governments for personal political gain; the move allowed him to call elections without vacating his post. Had Netanyahu stepped aside, his own party would have easily formed a relatively homogenous and stable coalition. With four elections in two years, Israel has been beholden to the political fate of one man. Ending this, more than anything, is the task Bennett and Lapid undertake.

Reality probably wont be so kind to the new government, however. What happens on the Israeli-Palestinian front often occurs while one is making other plans. Before Donald Trump appeared on the scene, Netanyahus answer to Johnsons question, I argued, was to doubt its very premise: There is no solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict in our lifetime, Netanyahu believed. Israel must hunker down, defend itself, dissuade any challengers and perhaps gain begrudging acceptance or at best normalization, not grand peace.

This anti-solutionist approach always contained within it a fateful contradiction, however. Israel was not actually pursuing a conservative, modest policy on the conflict. It was, and still is, actively shaping the conflicts parameters. Netanyahu and the right-wingers among the new coalition all championed policies that intentionally blurred the distinction between Israel and the West Bank. And this blurring of the Green Line is often not dependent on proactive cabinet decisions. Bureaucratic inertia and existing legal arrangements all create a strategy by default, whether the cabinet has a plan or not.

Now Netanyahu leaves office at a time when normalization has resumed without movement on the Palestinian issue. But this is also a time when many abroad view the two-state solution as an anachronistic platitude and therefore return with a vengeance to the question of what Israel wants to be. Some have their own answers.

The Biden administration, with a huge domestic and foreign agenda to think about, might also prefer if the Israeli-Palestinian conflict went to sleep for about four years, just like Bennett and Lapid. And yet, just like Israel, the administration has already been pulled back into conflict management, if not conflict resolution.

Bennett heads a very small party, and he earned the top post first simply because he was the hardest to peel off from the Netanyahu camp. Hes a successful tech entrepreneur, with an energetic, straight-shooting, can-do demeanor and a pragmatic approach to many domestic issues. He thinks of himself and hopes to be perceived abroad as someone driven by common sense, ready to listen. In joining this coalition, Bennett has lost his base in the right wing, leaving him only one path: forward. He must at least appear to succeed as prime minister, or all will have been for naught.

Biden will find in Bennett someone eager for a fresh start. In his first speech to the Knesset, before being sworn in, he spoke of working on Israels relations with both U.S. parties, even using the English term bipartisan, as Lapid advocates and in an implicit critique of Netanyahu, a Republican favorite and a villain to Democrats. Capitalizing on this, Washington would do well to see what practical steps it could advance in the West Bank, and perhaps even on Gaza with Bennett and Lapid.

Biden will not, however, find any more clarity than Lyndon B. Johnson: The question of what kind of Israel does Israel itself want will remain as vague as it was in 1968, and even more important today.

See the original post:

Israels new government agrees on only one thing: Booting Netanyahu - Brookings Institution

Israel Is Sending Robots With Machine Guns to the Gaza Border – Daily Beast

Posted By on June 25, 2021

Gaza is often described as the worlds largest open-air prison. Over two million people inhabit the tiny coastal strip, and they must endure a 70 percent unemployment rate; frequent shortages of medical supplies, fuel and clean water; constant power outages; and the fundamentalist governance of the extremist group Hamas. Add to that the Israeli air strikes that knocked down multiple high-rise residential buildings in a war last Maythe third war since Hamas seized control of Gaza in 2007.

Gazans whove had enough will find it difficult to leave. Theres both a naval blockade and a 40-mile-long border fence barring entry into Israel, complemented by an additional nine miles of steel and concrete walls on the Gaza-Egyptian border. Only a lucky minority are granted permits to pass through checkpoints into Israel or Egypt for work or medical care. But the checkpoints are frequently closed at times of high tension.

And now, in a new dystopian twist out of RoboCop, people defying the border barrier may be confronted by a robotic six-wheeled car blaring warnings from a built-in public address system. And if non-compliant, the robot can address the infraction with a turret-mounted machine gun.

The Gaza border barrier is supported by many Israelis because it has reduced to almost nil the ability of Hamas and other militant groups to carry out ambushes, kidnappings and suicide bombings in Israel. The Israeli border barrier features miles of sensor-infused smart fencing guarded by ground troops and armored vehicles, surveilled by orbiting drones, and monitored by SentryTech towers armed with remote-control .50 caliber machine guns capable of shredding light vehicles. The barriers extend underground too, blocking some but not all cross-border tunnels used by Palestinian smugglers.

Nonetheless, Gazans periodically mass in protest outside the one-mile-long buffer zone in front of the fence and sometimes even blast holes through it. While IDF guards can and do shoot to kill those deemed armed infiltrators, others appraised to be non-combatants may instead be repelled with tear gas dropped by drones, or accorded warning shots, sometimes followed by a sniper shot to the leg. During a violent surge of protests at the border in April and May of 2018, over 11,000 Palestinians were injured and 100 killed by IDF border forces, which suffered one fatality and several wounded.

Improvements to the barrier have caused Hamas to redirect efforts towards cultivating an arsenal of inaccurate long-range rockets it can launch towards Israeli cities from within Gaza, though the crude nature of the weapons mean a substantial fraction fall within Gaza, sometimes causing casualties.

Still, militants in Gaza do also harry IDF units surrounding the area, as well as nearby civilian communities, with sniper rifles, anti-tank missiles, shorter-range Qassam rockets and mortar bombardments. The only Israeli soldier to die in the May 2021 war was in a Jeep hit by a Russian-made anti-tank missile.

The IDF therefore wants these Jaguar armed robots to partially substitute for mobile patrols by flesh-and-blood soldiers, thereby improving force protection, in military jargon. The reasoning is that its preferable for a Jaguar to risk taking a hit from a rocket-propelled grenade or anti-material rifle than a human soldier. And should the robot somehow get captured, it can even reportedly self-disable its more sensitive components.

The IDF first announced it was deploying the 1.5-ton unmanned ground vehicles in April, prior to the May war with Hamas. Then on June 19, the National Resistance Brigades, the armed wing of a Palestinian Marxist group, posted photos of Israeli forces on the border, including an image of a Jaguar close to the fencing, though when the photo was taken is unclear.

Built by Israeli Aerospace Industries in cooperation with the IDF, the Jaguar is a semi-autonomous system, meaning it receives some directions from human operator but can perform tasks with more independence than a fully remote-controlled system. For example, the Jaguars AI can effectively drive around off-road obstructions or recharge itself at a charging station without supervision.

Likewise, a human operator ordinarily makes the decision to employ the armament on the Jaguars Pitbull remote weapon system by using a so-called point-and-shoot interface. The AI then automatically aims its stabilized FN MAG 7.62-millimeter machine gun and adjusts fire as necessary. The turrets combination of electro-optical and thermal sensors can detect humans up to 1.2 kilometers away, or 800 meters away at night.

As creepy as being gunned down by border patrol robots may be, military ethicists might argue that the Jaguars AI isnt intrinsically problematic: the robot may be killing people, but its not deciding to kill them. That call is made by a human operator located miles away, someone who may be less likely to jump the gun than a soldier on the ground fearing for their own safety, and who potentially may have to clear lethal actions with a supervising officer.

That said, Israeli defense expert Arie Egozi noted in a profile piece of the Jaguar that pre-programmed scenarios enable the UGV to fire autonomously. That sounds like it could enter the realm of robots making lethal kill decisions.

However, a former IDF soldier told me he thought it unlikely an autonomous hunter-kill mode would be enabled in Gaza given the risks of mishap and lack of compelling need. He speculated the autonomous combat capability might allow rapid return fire when fired upon, or be reserved for conventional warfighting missions where there would be a greater likelihood of disruption to a command link. I would be very dubious of the claim that its fully auto for border patrol, he wrote to me.

Indeed, once the IDF finishes deploying Jaguars to the Gaza division, it plans to integrate the robotic vehicles more broadly as relatively expendable scouts supporting manned ground forces. Russia and the United States are busy developing a range of more heavily armed robotic armored vehicles with similar missions in mind.

An Israeli soldier also comments in a video that the Jaguar could alternatively employ less-than-lethal weapons and crowd control capabilities. That seemingly refers to rubber bullets, tear gas and similar weapons, implying the Jaguar might be used beyond Gaza to police unrest and rioting, which spiked leading up to and at the onset of the May 2021 war.

In the end, unmanned systems amount to a new way to harm an adversary while denying them a chance to inflict meaningful harm in retributiona basic principle in military tactics. But reducing the risks and costs of using lethal force make resorting to force more appealing, and easier to scale up and maintain over long periods of time, just like the U.S. has maintained a drone assassination campaign for nearly two decades.

In that lens, the Jaguar is of a piece with the entire smart border wall around Gaza. As Basem Aly wrote in a 2019 piece for the Carnegie Endowment of International Peace that the wall is so effective at reducing Hamass ability to directly attack Israel that its part of a larger strategy to remove any security-based pressure on Israel to reach a two-state solution.

Ultimately, it remains debatable whether Jaguars will prove more problematic as border enforcers than regular patrols from a human rights standpoint. However, the increasing sophistication of the smart border is emblematic of a preference to use technology to manage away the security issues presented by Hamas and Gaza, rather than attempting to address the material and political conditions feeding a seemingly interminable conflict.

Its hard to imagine that young Gazans growing up in a geographically constrained world without economic prospects will not rage against the hi-tech machines deployed to keep them penned there, potentially radicalizing future generations in the coming decades.

Read the original here:

Israel Is Sending Robots With Machine Guns to the Gaza Border - Daily Beast

Israel says the Delta variant is infecting vaccinated people, representing as many as 50% of new cases. But they’re less severe. – Yahoo News

Posted By on June 25, 2021

An Israeli receives a coronavirus vaccine in Tel Aviv on January 6. Sebastian Scheiner/AP

As many as half of new COVID-19 cases in Israel are vaccinated people, a health official suggested.

The Delta variant, not as easily beaten by vaccines as other variants, is driving Israel's surge.

Although Infections among vaccinated people have alarmed Israelis, the infections appear to be milder than they are in unvaccinated people.

As Israel faces a surge in cases driven by the Delta variant, its health officials suggested that as many as half of new cases were among people who'd been vaccinated.

Fully vaccinated people who've come into contact with the Delta variant will have to quarantine, Chezy Levy, the director-general of Israel's health ministry, said on Wednesday, Haaretz reported.

"Even though the numbers are low, the fact that this is reaching vaccinated people means ... that we are still checking how many vaccinated people have also been infected," Levy said, according to Haaretz.

Levy told the state broadcaster Kan Bet that about 40% to 50% of new cases appeared to be people who had been vaccinated, Haaretz reported. He did not appear to specify a time frame for the new cases.

The figure is likely an estimate, as the ministry is still analyzing the cases. On Monday, Levy said that a third of the new daily cases were people who had been vaccinated.

It wasn't clear whether those people had been fully or partially vaccinated.

Although the infections among vaccinated people have alarmed Israelis, the infections do not appear to be as severe as they are in unvaccinated people.

Though they are preliminary, the figures underline the worry that the Delta variant could mean the virus continues to spread even in places like Israel where large portions of the population have been vaccinated.

New daily cases reported in Israel have jumped to over 100, the highest level there since May. About 70% of the cases have been caused by the Delta variant, Levy said on Monday.

Story continues

Israel had been ending its virus restrictions - it ended indoor masking last week as daily cases hovered in the single digits.

As of Thursday, about 57% of Israel's population had been fully vaccinated, according to Johns Hopkins University data.

As of Monday, no severe cases of COVID-19 had been reported from the latest surge, Ran Balicer, an executive at the Israeli healthcare organization Clalit, said in a tweet.

Of all the coronavirus variants, the Delta variant could pose the greatest risk to vaccinated people. Research suggests it's better able to break through in people who've had only one dose of two-dose vaccines, such as those from Pfizer and AstraZeneca.

On Monday, Mike Ryan, the executive director of the World Health Organization's health-emergencies program, said the Delta variant could "be more lethal because it's more efficient in the way it transmits between humans."

Two doses of the vaccines appear to be protective against Delta.

An analysis by UK health officials found that two doses of Pfizer's vaccine were 88% effective against Delta while a single shot was 33% effective. That's compared with 95% efficacy against the original strain, or 52% after one shot.

But no vaccine is 100% effective, and so-called breakthrough cases are still possible.

With other variants, breakthrough infections were mostly mild.

In the UK, where the Delta variant makes up more than 90% of cases, 26 of 73 total deaths associated with the Delta variant were among people who had been fully vaccinated, The Telegraph reported this week.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Read more:

Israel says the Delta variant is infecting vaccinated people, representing as many as 50% of new cases. But they're less severe. - Yahoo News

This Israeli dropout is on the front lines against Iran – Haaretz

Posted By on June 25, 2021

The wave of attacks over the last year provided much work for defensive cyber companies like Profero Cyber Security, founded by Omri Segev Myal and Guy Barnhart-Magen. Right now, as were talking, were handling six incidents at once, some of them small, the others big. One of them is a ransomware attack, while another is a classic deception of a CEO by email, which led to the theft of $100,000, says Segev Moyal.

In an interview, Segev Moyal points to several factors that link these attacks - usually but perhaps erroneously considered to be criminal and not political - to Iranians. When we analyzed the logs [a computers activity record] of one of these attacks, we saw that they were looking for specific documents on the [victims] server, for infrastructure or secret military projects. In some cases, we saw that the hacker opened a document, waited for two hours, and then closed it. We think that they were waiting for someone who could read Hebrew.

Further proof that these attacks were not actually aimed at collecting a ransom, says Segev Moyal, is the amount of public attention the hackers tried to pull to their break-ins. This is not typical of your usual cybercrime ransom attacks, in which the extortionist and the victim both have an interest in ending the incident quickly and quietly.

The Iranians try to embarrass Israel by spreading the news, he says. There were cases in which journalists knew about an attack before the victim found out, says Segev Moyal.

The Iranians attack through several groups Black Shadow, which specializes in stealing information and releasing it on Telegram channels it created; Pay2Key, which specializes in ransomware viruses; and Networm, which apparently is a new version of Pay2Key.

Were at war with Iran, and you cant call it a shadow war anymore, says Segev Moyal. Its open warfare. It includes assassinations of key figures, but most of it occurs in the cyber arena.

Are we losing this war?

They have had many successes, not necessarily technical ones, but in marketing, in public relations. Its commonly said that anyone can create a serious cyberattack today. Thats not true. You need a powerful state with technological abilities behind you, infrastructure and organizational military capabilities.

Hamas, with three hackers working in some hole, cant topple Israel. The Iranians would like to disable an entire country, and theyve had some successes. Are they saving special capabilities for a doomsday scenario? Perhaps.

Whats the big secret? How many Iranian attacks have there been so far?

So far, there have been 32 publicized attacks in the last year and a half. These are attacks that were revealed on the websites of cyberattack groups or ones that came to the attention of the media. I count the attack on Amital Data as a single incident, even though 40 companies were affected.

Sending victims an invoice

Profero, founded last year by Segev Moyal and Guy Barnhart-Magen, is what is called an incident response (IR) company, something akin to a rapid-response team in the cybersecurity world. By the time theyre called in, the victim has already been hit, sometimes accompanied by a demand for ransom. We do only that. Were not a consulting firm or one that sells products, explains Segev Moyal. That way, we dont find ourselves in a conflict-of-interest situation. Our job is to enable a company to come out of a crisis in the best manner possible.

There are quite a few cybersecurity companies out there, including ones such as OP Innovate, Clearsky and Konfidas. Such companies reportedly charge between $150 and $800 an hour per person for the services they provide. The price in a big incident can reach hundreds of thousands of dollars, says Segev Moyal. But this is negligible, compared to the cost of a company being paralyzed and the harm to its brand and reputation.

So, is your briefcase always full of equipment?

Always, even the one Im carrying now, although most incidents can be handled remotely. The company has no office. You cant work remotely if its not part of your daily activities. The company employs people in New Zealand, Singapore, Colombia and other countries. At any given moment, there are six people available to tackle an incident. Its faster and more effective than flying someone out, but in some extreme cases we do have to get to the customer.

For competitive reasons, Segev Moyal prefers not to reveal the exact number of people he employs, but it is believed to be more than 20.

Do most attacks come from Iran?

Most of them dont. What we hear in the media relates mainly to Iran. The coronavirus pandemic generated a significant increase in cybercrime since people couldnt go out, and there was hardly any physical crime. Why should I break into a store if I can simply send someone an email and tell them I saw him surfing on a pornography site?

"The cyberattack axis of evil Russia, Ukraine and North Korea encourages cyberhacking companies working from their territory. Even China, which once only engaged in data theft, has expanded to economic crimes. In these countries, it contributes to the local economy since the money goes into the pockets of individuals and companies, who sometimes even pay taxes on it, while slowing down the West.

Is the handling of these cases different?

Totally. In one case where the attacker was the Pay2Key group, the customer had already made the first payment, but then we analyzed the address of the Bitcoin purse the attackers had provided for paying the ransom, and we realized it was coming from Iran. We told the customer to stop, that this was money going to a foreign country that might be financing hostile activities.

And when its a criminal incident?

We check that its not part of a campaign by a foreign government and that there wasnt substantial damage to business and that no information leaked out that required disclosure. If so, the company often decides to pay, with no one finding out about the incident. Chris Kyle, who wrote the book American Sniper, said that despite what your momma told ya, violence does solve problems. So, in contrast to what people tell you, paying ransom sometimes solves the problem. In some cases, we laundered the attacker. The company paid up and the attacker sent an invoice as if it had done a cyber-related consulting job.

Whats the highest ransom ever paid by a company you worked with?

It was $12 million, but there are other cases out there in which much higher amounts were paid. Several sources claim that the Israeli company Tower paid over $10 million in a ransomware attack last year, in addition to the massive cost of having its assembly lines halted at a particularly busy time of the year.

Cyber-hygiene

Segev Moyal admits that hes a strange bird in the cyberworld, and hes probably right. I dont have 12 years of schooling and I wasnt in a tech unit in the army. He grew up in the Haifa suburb of Nesher. He was introduced to computers by his grandfather, a retired worker at the Nesher cement factory.

At the age of 70, he decided that this was the next thing. He bought a computer and started learning programming and teaching his grandchildren at the same time. He bought me a computer against the wishes of my father, who was a battalion commander in the army and didnt understand why I needed one.

When Segev Moyals computer was infected with a virus, he learned how to fix it himself, starting his long romance with the cyber world. While still in the army I got special permission and started working in this area. After the army. he went on a trip to New Zealand. In New Zealand, its easy to get into university after the age of 21, and when I was there, there was a big earthquake and all the foreign students dropped out. I started studying computers and even received a scholarship. I didnt graduate it seemed like a waste of time.

Later in his career, like many people in this field, Segev Moyal set up a product-oriented company called Minerva Labs, which still exists. After five years he felt that the market needed something else. In 2019, I sat down with Guy Barnhart-Magen, who was at Intel at the time, and we recognized that there was a problem in that companies didnt have the technology or people to deal with cyberattacks. We decided to set up a company devoted to such incidents.

A few days ago, Segev Moyal revealed some critical information that has only been known to insiders: A large share of the attacks over the previous 18 months something like half the vulnerability that hackers had been exploiting was via Fortinet, a company whose services are very popular in Israel both as a relatively low-cost paywall and a virtual private network (VPN). A well-known weakness in Fortinet's device was the No. 1 cause of the Iran-backed attacks on Israel that youve heard about," Segev Moyal tweeted.

Isnt it ironic that a device that is supposed to protect networks ended up being the source of a security breach?

Its terrible. These devices, most of which, by the way, are made by medium-sized companies, not first-string players, are very problematic. They give you a sense of security, but it is very difficult to work with a complicated set of rules and lots of vulnerabilities.

Doesnt it seem a little anachronistic to be using a physical device when today there are so many cloud-based solutions, such as Zscaler?

Completely. Using a VPN device today is like buying a horse-drawn carriage. We recommend Zscaler, Cloudflare or any other cloud solution to organizations.

Segev Moyal reveals a list of cybersecurity failures. First, the use of outdated solutions. Second, and more serious, the vulnerabilities in Fortinet products through which Iranian hackers have been known since about 2019 to penetrate networks. If organizations would update their hardware to the latest versions and change passwords frequently, hackers would have a much harder time. But organizations dont do it and leave the door wide open to attacks, he explains.

To be honest, updating a firewall isnt an easy matter, because in a small organization where there may be only one standard it means shutting down temporarily. So, I think they need to move to cloud solutions, which by definition is constantly being updated to the latest version.

Another thing that has been revealed by the wave of cyberattacks is that most security products, including the best-known ones in the market, arent necessarily able to detect attacks and block them. You'd be surprised, but even many of the EDR [the latest generation of end-user solutions] failed to warn of an attack, says Segev Moyal.

Therell be no one left to attack

So what can you do? Segev Moyal answers with one word: Hygiene.

By the term cyber-hygiene, he means a series of Sisyphean operations, such as a complete separation of work environments and networks, procedures for allowing new employees into the network and ensuring they are removed when they leave the organization, regular password updates, permissions and access policies by according to employee category, dual-stage authentication protection (e.g., a password and text message) for accessing sensitive services, encryption of sensitive assets like the main management tool for a big organization's computers and so on.

In most medium-sized organizations, the information systems manager has two options, says Segev Moyal. The first is to separate networks within the organization, to update systems, to manage passwords and to move applications to the cloud in other words, doing a lot of hard, thankless work.

The second option is to have an experienced salesperson come to the company who will recommend certain cybersecurity products and promise they will solve all your problems. For 100,000 shekels, youre set. Thats what most managers choose. But the truth is that that option doesnt stop everything, especially a stubborn attacker. In one incident, we saw the attacker try to penetrate the system 16 times with remote software. Eventually, they succeeded.

Who makes the decision at the end of the day?

There are CEOs that really care about cybersecurity, and they call us directly and consult. But theyre a minority. In a directors course, you learn a lot of things finance, human resources, law but they have only recently begun teaching about cybersecurity.

So, its the managers who are to blame?

Not only them. Compare it to something in the real world. Say that theres a group of armed Iranians entering a park in Tel Aviv, robbing stores and uploading a video of the whole thing to TikTok. Its a matter of national importance. If so, then I say take national responsibility for incidents like that. In the case of the attack on the Shirbit computers, for example, the Shin Bet security service or some other government agency should come and say: This is an anti-Israel act and we are going to help. But here the company is left to fend for itself.

The U.S. The Treasury Department issued a statement in October 2020 prohibiting the paying of ransom to the Lazarus group because it is from North Korea. This made it easier for companies. Why havent we seen anything similar about Iranian ransomware groups? In my opinion, if a company is harmed in an incident like this, it should be compensated by the state.

But we have the National Cyber Directorate. They dont play this role for Israeli companies?

In the incidents with which we have been involved, they sometimes do excellent work and sometimes catastrophic work. But my question is what is their goal. Is it a body intended to protect Israel or is it an arm of the Shin Bet? Its hard to know what they want. They collect information but dont share it. Are they a technical body? An intelligence organization? It always seems that behind it is some kind of undefined interest, but its not the interest of the company thats been attacked. Sometimes I have the feeling they want to keep the conflict with Iran going but on the backburner. Why does the agency report to the Prime Ministers Office and not to the Finance Ministry, for example?

The National Cyber Directorate said in response that, the directorate has launched a new national program, which combines the capabilities of the government with those of private IR companies to help us contend with attacks. We invite everyone who has not yet joined to take part in the program, take advantage of our rapid information-sharing system and get to know the added value of what we do."

Segev Moyal says he thinks that things will get worse before they get better. In the last few weeks, weve seen the attack on the Colonial Pipeline in the U.S., production stopped at the JBS meat plant and attacks on health care institutions. I think that hackers dont have a lot of places left to attack, so theyre going to more sensitive places, like security installations, factories and hospitals.

Countries will have to recalibrate, as they did when they cooperated to stop money laundering. It will happen when they come to realize that ransomware attacks are harming productivity. "

Excerpt from:

This Israeli dropout is on the front lines against Iran - Haaretz


Page 761«..1020..760761762763..770780..»

matomo tracker