Page 765«..1020..764765766767..770780..»

Israel and Palestine: Co-opting the false narrative | Opinion – NorthJersey.com

Posted By on June 21, 2021

Jason M. Shames and Lee Lasher, Special to the USA TODAY Network Published 4:15 a.m. ET June 21, 2021

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahus Security Cabinet approved a unilateral cease-fire to halt the military operation in the Gaza Strip. USA TODAY

Now that attention has shifted away from last month's outbreak of Palestinian violence including Hamas missile attacks against Israel, another severe battle is brewing worldwide, threatening the Jewish people. As we know, the recent conflict started with planned riots and then escalated to launching close to 5,000 rockets at Israeli civilians, homes, apartment buildings, schools, hospitals, houses of worship and places of business. Todays relative calm obscures the extraordinary effort by Palestinian leaders and their followers to actively discredit Israelis and Jews with a distorted narrative.

Let's begin with the historical accusations they are making about Israel implying genocide and ethnic cleansing. During the Holocaust, six million Jews died, reducing the total European Jewish population by more than two-thirds in just six years between 1939 and 1945. By contrast, the Palestinian population in disputed lands and Gaza has doubled over the past 21 years. Additionally, slogans and chants like "Death to Israel" and the infamous "From the River to the Sea, Palestine Will Be Free (of Jews)" actually and directly call for genocide. Shouldnt that be shocking to all?

Smoke from flares rises in the sky in Gaza City, in the northern Gaza Strip on Thursday. (AP Photo)

Also, let's not ignore that Hamas, the strongest political, military and most followed Palestinian entity, is a United States-designated terror organization. And for good reason. Hamas states in its covenant that "Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it." By contrast, in Israel's declaration of statehood the language includes "ensure(s) complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants irrespective of religion, race or sex; it will guarantee freedom of religion, conscience, language, education, and culture; it will safeguard the Holy Places of all religions; and it will be faithful to the principles of the Charter of the United Nations."

During the recent conflict, Palestinians advanced a narrative of Israel being a white colonizer. They did this with hopes of steering American policy and linking themselves as oppressed in the "white, black, brown" racial and intersectionality discourse of existing American discontent.And in many cases, it worked. Intersectionality has evolved as a concept that all oppression is linked in some ways. And we believe the recent #StopHate movements have been co-opted to blur the lines and nuances of different situations, often ignoring history and painting all conflicts with the same broad brushstroke. Where are the hashtags to "#StopJewishHate" alongside "#StopAsianHate" or "#Black LivesMatter"?

Distressingly, this narrative has been enthusiastically picked up by many media outlets, including the usual culprits The New York Times and CNN as well as other social media platforms. Even the minority of elected officials who subscribe to this false narrative seem to get more coverage than the majority who support Israel and its right to defend itself.

Where is the outcry against Palestinian treatment of the LGBTQ community or religious minorities? Do progressives truly want to align themselves with a brutal, repressive, terror regime that calls for the destruction of the one Jewish homeland and shoots missiles at civilians while hiding behind and endangering their own people? How is that not hypocritical?

When these and other truths are so obviously ignored the accurate assumption is that anti-Semitism is the driver behind these false narratives and this anti-Israel bias.

We know there are parts to this issue that are complex and complicated. Were not suggesting there are easy answers. But we wholeheartedly believe that until there is a true understanding and representation of all sides of the issues, there is little, if any chance, of resolving this conflict. In the meantime, we will continue to stand up for our Israel and the Jewish people.

Jason M. Shames is CEO of theJewish Federation of Northern New Jersey. Lee Lasher is president of theJewish Federation of Northern New Jersey.

Read or Share this story: https://www.northjersey.com/story/opinion/2021/06/21/israel-and-palestine-co-opting-false-narrative/7744170002/

See the original post:

Israel and Palestine: Co-opting the false narrative | Opinion - NorthJersey.com

Outgoing FM Ashkenazi hails past year’s ‘historic’ diplomatic achievements – The Times of Israel

Posted By on June 19, 2021

Israels international standing improved over the last year, says outgoing Foreign Minister Gabi Ashkenazi at a farewell ceremony with ministry staff and diplomats before Yair Lapid takes over the post.

He says the ministry gave Israel a diplomatic Iron Dome during the 11-day conflict between Israel and Hamas last month.

We enjoyed broad international support, which provided us freedom of action and prevented every anti-Israel resolution during the operation and immediately afterward, he says, with the exception of the UN Human Rights Council.

He says that normalization with Arab states over the past years is a historic paradigm shift that is expected to change the Middle East for future generations.

Ashkenazi adds that billions of shekels have been invested in Israel in the wake of the deals, including in natural gas, infrastructure, and more.

He also stresses the fundamental importance of the peace agreements with Egypt and Jordan and strengthening ties with the two neighboring countries.

Youre serious. We appreciate that!

Were really pleased that youve read X Times of Israel articles in the past month.

Thats why we come to work every day - to provide discerning readers like you with must-read coverage of Israel and the Jewish world.

So now we have a request. Unlike other news outlets, we havent put up a paywall. But as the journalism we do is costly, we invite readers for whom The Times of Israel has become important to help support our work by joining The Times of Israel Community.

For as little as $6 a month you can help support our quality journalism while enjoying The Times of Israel AD-FREE, as well as accessing exclusive content available only to Times of Israel Community members.

Read the original here:

Outgoing FM Ashkenazi hails past year's 'historic' diplomatic achievements - The Times of Israel

Arizona Israel Chamber of Commerce gets off the ground in Prescott – Jewish News of Greater Phoenix

Posted By on June 19, 2021

When Sanford and Terry Cohen moved to Prescott in 1985, there wasnt a lot going on in Jewish life.

The entire Jewish community met in the living room of a house, Sanford Cohen said. There were about 12 couples. There was no actual synagogue or temple set up.

The Prescott Jewish community has grown since then. There are two synagogues and several Israeli-owned companies, including one CP Technologies that hosted its grand opening ceremony June 9.

The Israeli Arizona connection is getting stronger and stronger, Cohen said, prompting him to decide that now is the time to get his wifes and his long-envisioned initiative off the ground: The Arizona Israel Chamber of Commerce.

The common knowledge that people have about Israel is so misinformed that we really felt as though there needed to be some sort of eye-opening avenue, where people can learn about the real Israel and not the one that is portrayed on the news, Cohen said.

The Cohens plan to focus the chamber on cultural and economic exchange, including in the area of wine making.

To that end, he has spoken with some winemakers and Yavapai College, which has a robust wine program, about the value of a potential learning opportunity with Israelis.

Israel has done such a phenomenal job of developing a wine-making industry in a terrain and climate that is very similar to Arizona, Cohen said. I think Arizona winemakers have a lot to learn from the state of Israel.

A 2017 study by the Alliance Bank Business Outreach Center and Northern Arizona University found the Arizona wine tourism industry creates an estimated $56.2 million in total economic output.

Paula Woolsey, vice president of the Verde Valley Wine Consortium and professor of wine at Yavapai College, said that footprint has most certainly grown since then, but current data is not available.

Doing something with Israel would be awesome, she said. Talking about wine with people from different places around the world is a great way to bolster your own growth.

The Cohens are looking at the areas of culinary arts, music and history, but they are open to shifting directions as things progress.

Ruth Ashkenazi joined the chamber as its business development officer the second week of June.

This is a very serious grassroots effort to make sure that were building bridges, Ashkenazi said. Especially in this day and age, when theres so much tension, we need all the bridge building we can get.

She is looking into potentially creating tourism packages for Israelis visiting Prescott.

Cohen and Ruth said they have seen a lot of emphasis on recruiting support for Israel from Arizona. Were actually looking to create more support and stimulate some curiosity about Arizona from Israel, said Cohen.

The Cohens have previous experience with local chambers of commerce. Terry Cohen was vice president of the Prescott Valley Chamber of Commerce from 1987-1994 and Sanford Cohen was president of the chamber from 2001-2002. He was later chairman of the Prescott Chamber of Commerce from 2017-2018. Theyve had the intention and vision for an Arizona Israel Chamber for several years, starting paperwork for the formation of a limited liability company in 2015. They received nonprofit status from the IRS in 2018.

We had hoped someday that we would do it after our radio career is over, but that doesnt appear to be in the cards, said Sanford Cohen, who founded and runs Arizonas Hometown Radio Group with his wife.

Ashkenazi moved from California to Prescott late last year and happened to meet the Cohens shortly after. They hit it off, and talked about the vision for the chamber as a group.

With the arrival of CP Technologies to Prescott, we all kind of got our heads together and said, This just might be the springboard to get the Arizona Israel Chamber of Commerce off the ground. And so thats what Ruth generously agreed to be appointed as the business development officer.

Hillel Newman, Consul General of Israel to the Pacific Southwest of the United States, attended the opening of CP Technologies, where he met the Cohens and Ashkenazi.

Newman said he welcomes the creation of the Arizona Israel Chamber.

It will be the third organization dedicated to economic relations, he said, referencing the Arizona Israel Technology Alliance, dedicated to increasing and supporting trade, and the Arizona-Israel Trade and Investment Office in Israel.

Leib Bolel, president and CEO of the Arizona Israel Technology Alliance, said the new chamber has potential.

With its focus on culture, arts and beyond, there is a large opportunity beyond just technology that the state of Arizona and Israel both share and can benefit from one another, Bolel said.

Chabad of Prescott Rabbi Elie Filler said hes seen tremendous growth in the Jewish community in the six years since hes been in Prescott, and its been a source of pride for the town to host the Israeli-owned companies.

Its like a super honor to have Israeli companies I just hear about it from so many people, Jew and Gentile alike, he said. It gives a lot of pride to the Jewish people who are here when they see an Israeli company coming and its so well-received and supported by everyone in the city.

It would be nice to have more Israelis come to Prescott to visit, he said. He thinks they will be pleasantly surprised to find Judaism in the small city south of the Bradshaw Mountains. JN

Go here to see the original:

Arizona Israel Chamber of Commerce gets off the ground in Prescott - Jewish News of Greater Phoenix

Conveniently overlooking history with Israel and Palestine – The Register-Guard

Posted By on June 19, 2021

Craig Weinerman| Register-Guard

In his guest view from May 23, M. Reza Benham engages in identity politics by falsely framing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in terms of race ("What Black Americans and Palestinians share").

The Black community's struggle for civil rights in the United States and its reliance, for the most part, on peaceful resistance to bigotry and oppression is in sharp contrast to Palestinian terror groups such as Hamas, whose charter calls for the destruction of Israel and the murder of Jews wherever they may be found.

Hamas is a radical Islamist terror group financed by Iran. It seeks to replace Israel with an Islamist Palestinian state. The U.S., Canada, European Union and Japan have designated Hamas as a terrorist organization.

Behnam: What Black Americans and Palestinians share

Hamas committed war crimes when it indiscriminately fired more than 4,300 rockets at Israel's civilian population during the recent 11-day Gaza war. Its aim was not only to murder Israeli Jews but in so doing endangered Israel's Arab population of approximately 1.9 million. Many Hamas rockets misfired and landed in Gaza killing and injuring Palestinians.

Hamas stores and launches it rockets next to hospitals, mosques, schools and residences. It uses its civilian population as human shields, which is another war crime.

Those who insists on putting a racial spin on the conflict are mistaken. An examination of the demographics of Israel reveals that it is multi-racial, multi-religious, multi-ethnic country.

Israel has a population of 9.3 million, 74% are Jewish, 21% are Arabs and 18% are Muslim.

Mizrahi Jews are brown-skinned descendants of Jews from the Middle East and North Africa. Mizrahi Jews make up approximately 45% of Israel's Jewish population. Ashkenazi (European) Jews constitute 32% of Israel's Jewish population. The majority of Israeli Jews are brown, not white.

Israel's conflict with the Palestinians is not about race. It is about whether both sides are willing to recognize the legitimacy of the presence of the other and agree to partition the land into separate states.

Jews and Black Americans have historically been close allies. Many American Jews were active participants and leaders in the March on Washington with the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in 1963.

In 1968, Jews and Black Americans mourned the assassination of Sen. Robert F. Kennedy by Sirhan Sirhan, a Palestinian man, who murdered Kennedy because he was a strong supporter of Israel. Kennedy supported civil rights, the war on poverty and an end to the Vietnam War. Sirhan profoundly changed the trajectory of American history.

The Jewish Council for Public Affairs and its affiliated Jewish Community Relations Councils mobilized to address racial injustice following the murder of George Floyd. It supports criminal justice and police reform. It advocates against racism, antisemitism, hate and bigotry.

White supremacy is a common enemy of Jewish and Black Americans.The hundreds of white nationalists marching through the University of Virginia campus carrying burning torches in 2017 chanted "Jews will not replace us." This was eerily reminiscent of Nazi Party rallies in Nuremberg, Germany, during the 1930s.

The targeting of Jewish-Americans and Jewish institutions with violence and hate (i.e, "Hitler was right") during and following the 11-day Gaza War was distressing, confounding and terrifying.

Those who demonize Israel and hold it to a double standard for defending itselfconveniently overlook history. Gaza was captured by Israel during its Six Day War with Jordan, Syria and Egypt in 1967. In 2005, Israel unilaterally withdrew its military and settlements, which housed 8,000 Israelis who lived in Gaza. Israel hoped that the result of its disengagement would be an economically thriving Palestinian enclave on the Mediterranean.

Gaza soon became a terror enclave after Hamas won elections. It started launching rockets into Israel leading to wars in 2008, 2012, 2014 and 2021.

The Palestinians have rejected at least five comprehensive offers of statehood since 1947. They are unwilling to accept any compromise that would result in partition of the land into Jewish and Palestinian states because it rejects the legitimacy of a Jewish state in any part of Israel's ancestral homeland.

Those who engage in racial identity politics to explain the conflict should consider the insights of Rep. Richie Torres (D-N.Y.), who cautions against "reducing everything to an overarching narrative. Every country, every conflict has its own history, its own particularity, its own complexity and none of that should be ignored in favor of an overarching ideology that purports to explain everything."

Craig Weinerman was chairman of the Jewish Community Relations Council of Lane County from 2005-2013.He lives in Eugene.

Submit a letter to the editor of 200 words or fewer to rgletters@registerguard.com. Include your full name, mailing address and phone number for purposes of verification. If accepted, only your name and city will be published. Letters are edited for style, clarity and are fact checked. Please provide any relevant links to your research. Each writer may only publish one letter per 30 days.

Submit a guest view by emailing bomeara@registerguard.com your draft of either 525 words or 725 words, not in between. Include any relevant links to resources and research. Also, be sure to include a short biography explaining who you are, what you do and where you live. Writers may publish one guest view per 90 days.

View post:

Conveniently overlooking history with Israel and Palestine - The Register-Guard

For Israels new government, Egypt key to calm on border with Gaza – Al-Monitor

Posted By on June 19, 2021

Several fires broke out in the Eshkol region in the south of Israel June 16, apparently sparked by balloons carryingincendiary devices launched from the Gaza Strip. It was the second day in a row that such fires broke out. After the first day of fires, the Israeli army launched airstrikes against Hamas targets in Gaza. But last night, no strikes were carried out. Reportedly, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) arenow expecting for Gaza balloon attacks to calm down.

Hamas was reportedly surprised by the Israeli retaliation over the incendiary balloons, conveying to Israel a message via Egypt that they will not accept such a response. Israel reportedly answered that even if it did not retaliate last night over the balloons, it will under no circumstances accept that such attacks continue.

At the same time, Israelipress reports about messages conveyed by Israels new government, over its willingness to continue with efforts for an arrangement with Hamas. An Israeli delegation headed by the National Security Council is expected to arrive to Cairo already this week for talks with their Egyptian counterparts. The delegation will discuss a framework for an arrangement with Hamas and also the issue of the bodies of IDF soldiers and the two Israeli civilians held by the group, with the possibility of a prisoner exchange deal. The reports said gaps between the sides are still big, but there is willingness to advance.

Newly appointed head of the Knesset security ad foreign affairs committee Ram Ben-Barak said June 17, Bringing in the Egyptians on board on this issue is the right move. In the [2014] Protective Edge Operation [in Gaza], it was the Qataris leading the arrangement [between Israel and Hamas], and that proved to be difficult.

Evidently, while tensions on the Israeli border with Gaza increase, Egypt keeps its efforts to advance talks between the sides. Reportsat the beginning of this week said that Egypt had notified Hamas it intends to open a new round of mediated talks with Israel.

On June 14, the day he took office, Foreign Minister Yair Lapid shortly addressed relations with Egypt. Great things have happened this past year. We need to continue the development that started with the Abraham Accords, to work to strengthen the peace with the Gulf States, withEgypt and with Jordan," said Lapid.

Two days later, Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry referred to his countrys future relationship with Prime Minister Naftali Bennett's new government, stating, "Egypt is striving to work with [the Israeli government] to advance the peace process with the Palestinians, and to bring about the establishment of an independent Palestinian state based on a two-state solution. Egypt seeks to bring the conflict to an end, which will bring stability and peace to the region."

The statements of Lapid and Ben-Barak, and the expected Israeli delegation to Cairo, indicate an understanding in Jerusalem within the new government that the key to a long-term calm on its southern border with Gaza is Egypt. In fact, sources at the Foreign Ministry told Al-Monitor that while Israel will by no means accept for the Gaza balloon terror to go on, Lapid is expected to continue with the same approach as his predecessor Gabi Ashkenazi of strengthening ties with Egypt, both in the security realm and in other fields. Indeed, Ashkenazi in person had arrived in Cairo May 30 for talks with Shoukry. It is the first time in almost 13 years that an Israeli foreign minister has paid an official visit toEgypt.

This forging alliance and mutual trust between Jerusalem and Cairo stand in contrast to Jerusalems ties with Brussels in the last days of the Netanyahu government. On June 9, Foreign Ministry representatives refused to meet with European Union representative for the Middle East peace process Sven Koopmans during hisvisit to the region. Jerusalem was expressing its dissatisfaction over comments made by the European High Commissioner for Foreign Affairs Josep Borrell during Operation Guardian of the Walls. Borrell had blamed Israel for using disproportionate force against Gazans, omitting any reference to the 4,300 rockets Hamas had fired at Israel.

Read more from the original source:

For Israels new government, Egypt key to calm on border with Gaza - Al-Monitor

Too Jewish For Hollywood: As Antisemitism Soars, Hollywood Should Address Its Enduring Hypocrisy In Hyperbolic Caricatures of Jews – Variety

Posted By on June 19, 2021

Several years ago, a non-Jewish film producer turned to me and announced, casually and with an air of arrogance and ignorance reserved particularly for bigots, Jews control Hollywood.

He assured me this was a compliment, as many antisemites are wont, trotting out Neal Gablers seminal text on the subject, An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood, as evidence. But it was clear that said producer had either never read Gablers book, or missed one of its key points entirely: the founding producers of the film biz were Jewish, most of them Eastern European immigrants, excluded and ostracized from virtually every other industry in America.

William Fox, Carle Laemmle, Louis B. Mayer they created Hollywood out of collective necessity, a decidedly human desire to realize the American Dream. They were not wanted anywhere else. But if these pioneering studio heads were Jewish, the majority of directors, writers and actors were not. Preston Sturges, Frank Capra, John Ford, Howard Hawkes these were the artists largely shaping early 20th century cinema in the U.S.

In short, there is a core etymological difference between invent and control.

This was not, of course, the first time Id heard uttered the weary and delusional trope that Jews, who comprise roughly 0.2 % of the worlds total population, are somehow at the totalitarian helm of an industry that, per the U.S. Dept. of Labor, supports some 2.6 million jobs. Growing up Jewish in post-Holocaust America, Ive experienced antisemitism in all its various nefarious forms, from violent physical assaults to passive microaggressions shrouded in the guise of woke intellectualism.

But, for whatever reason aside from the well-documented epigenetic trauma, antisemitism can breed introspection in its objects of hatred said producers assertion that Jews dominate decision-making in Hollywood prompted me to examine the years working in the film industry in which I, a Jew, had zero decision-making power.

In 1997, after graduating from USC with an MFA in screenwriting, I spent that summer penning a semi-autobiographical script that would ultimately land me a deal at a major motion picture studio. Before sending it out, however, my then-agent advised me to make the storyline less Jewish. Could we change the Jewish characters to Irish-Catholic ones? she asked. We could, so I did. Because I was new to the biz and assumed that is what one needed to do in order to work as a screenwriter.

In truth, it wasnt difficult. I grew up in Boston, a city with the highest percentage of Irish ancestry in the United States. I wore green on St. Patricks Day and sat through annual elementary school screenings of Darby OGill and the Little People. So, I changed the bat mitzvah scene in my script to a First Communion and switched the Cohen family to the McConnells. The essence of the script felt lost, but at least Id scored a job.

From that moment on, the message was clear: you can be Jewish in Hollywood, but not too Jewish.

For decades the watering-down of Jewish representation in TV and film, namely in terms of casting, struck me as an annoying but not necessarily harmful casualty of Jewish life in America, one in which assimilation not just for Jews, but for every ethnic group has always come at the expense of subverting ones cultural identity. But amidst a surge of antisemitism in the United States per the FBI, 63% of all reported religion-based hate crimes in 2019 were directed at Jews, making it the single-largest category and the fact that scant few individuals are speaking out against these crimes, it bears reminding those in the industry that, as with any other ethnic minority (Asians, Blacks, Indigenous peoples), the perception of Jews onscreen does matter. In a day and age in which a focus on diversity and inclusion is front and center, its a hypocrisy to affirm it doesnt.

Are there Jewish characters on screen? Of course. From Jerry Seinfeld to Fran Dreschers nanny and Debra Messings Grace, there are Jewish protagonists that are writ large in the American pop cultural canon. But for every Larry David, theres a Cheryl Hines, a non-Jewish spouse, friend foil, if you will to offset the Jewishness. To make it more accessible for American society at large. (Unless the storyline is about the Holocaust; then Hollywood seems to be OK with an entire family being Jewish, especially if they die at the end.) When there is a Jewish actor playing a Jew, Hollywood effectively demands said actor to express at least slight moral disdain and psychological discomfort with ones Jewishness. The edgy, neurotic misfit Jew has become synonymous with Jews in film and TV, from Woody Allen in every movie hes made to every actor playing Woody Allens surrogate to Seth Rogens nebbish-y pothead slacker in Knocked Up.

Because, God forbid, Jews like being Jewish. Far more fashionable to be a little self-hating.

Actors ignoring or nonchalantly brushing off antisemitic comments statements further perpetuating the damaging mythical assertion that Jews imagine the hatred directed their way can be cast as Jews. And they are. Hollywood has no issue with this at all. Take Mank, for example, David Finchers biopic about Citizen Kane screenwriter Herman J. Mankiewicz. Gary Oldman, who netted an Oscar nom for his portrayal of Mank, told Playboy magazine in 2014 that people should get over Mel Gibsons infamous 2006 antisemitic rant. And they did, of course. Despite Gibsons antisemitic (and misogynistic and racist) slurs, hes continued to work as a director and actor. His status in the biz has thrived; in 2017, Gibson earned an Oscar nom for directing Hacksaw Ridge.

The messaging here, too, is clear: You can say and do things that are antisemitic, and still go on to have a flourishing career.

With rare exception in the way of Barbra Streisand perhaps the singular Jewish superstar whose cultural identity, not to mention her unrelenting support of Israel, is allowed free rein across music, television and film Hollywood seems to find an almost obsessive, near-pathological need to dilute female Jewish characters. Or erase.

The examples are vast, and they are also maddening. In The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel, Jewish heroine Midge is played by non-Jew Rachel Brosnahan. In On the Basis of Sex, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the modern-day thinking Jewish womans pin-up for her groundbreaking contributions to constitutional law, is played by non-Jewish British actor Felicity Jones. And in Hulus Mrs. America, Jewish second-wave feminists Betty Friedan, Bella Abzug and Gloria Steinem are played by Tracy Ullman, Margo Martindale and Rose Byrne none of whom are Jewish. Julianne Moore (not Jewish), also played Steinem in Julie Taymors The Glorias. And in ABCs long-running sitcom The Goldbergs, shopaholic balabusta Beverly Goldberg is played by non-Jewish comedian Wendy McClendon-Covey. Even Elsa, the adolescent Jew in the Wall in Taika Waititis Oscar-winning Jojo Rabbit, is played by non-Jewish actor Thomasin McKenzie.

My current favorite: in Guy Nattivs upcoming Golda Meir biopic, Helen Mirren (and, yes, the Oscar-winner is an inarguably gifted actor), will play Israels lone female prime minister, an iron-fisted global leader who commandeered Israel to victory during the Yom Kippur War. Because nothing says Kiev-born, Milwaukee-raised kibbutznik-turned-gray-bunned grandmother of the Jewish people a political figure who embraced her ugliness as a political asset and whom David Ben Gurion was fond of calling the best man in the governmentthan a regal British Dame with ancestral ties to Russian nobility.

As Sarah Silverman, who speaks freely of oft being considered too Jewish to play certain roles, noted on her podcast and on The Howard Stern Show last November: Lately its been happening if that role is a Jewish woman, but [if] she is courageous, or she deserves love, or has bravery, or is altruistic in any way, shes played by a non-Jew.

If Jews controlled Hollywood, its fair to say this would not be happening.

There are anomalies, and those, too, deserve mention. Israeli actor Shira Haas, who earned an Emmy nom for her role in Unorthodox, will play Golda Meir in the upcoming small-screen drama Lioness, which Streisand is set to executive produce. And then, there is Shtisel, the Israeli TV series so meticulous in its nuanced, understated, realistic portrayal of Jewish life that it revolves around a Haredi family living in an ultra-Orthodox Jerusalem neighborhood detracts none from its universality; its a commercial hit in places ranging from Stockholm to Paris its of near-miraculous proportions. Why? Because Shtisel never panders to Jewish stereotypes. Its characters are Jewish, they are played by Jews (albeit secular ones, which goes even further to prove my point) and its plotlines unfold in ways that, while adhering to the laws and traditions of ultra-Orthodox Jewry, never once undercut the impenetrable humanity of its protagonists. They are Jews, but they are people.

The Jews just are.

Hollywood has a social responsibility to reflect with unflinching accuracy the experience of being an ethnic minority in America, whether Asian or Black or Muslim or Indigenous, and that same social imperative holds true for the Jewish community. Because being Jewish is not about a wig or an accent or talking really loud. Its not about bagels. Being Jewish is about a shared history, a soul, a spirit in Hebrew we call it a neshama. Amidst the terrifying rise of antisemitism, Jews in America do not feel safe. And in truth, we never have. The ways in which we are portrayed on screen yields significant real-life consequencessome positive, but far too many dangerous. The last thing the Jewish community needs right now is hyperbolic misrepresentation of who we actually are.

The simple, boring truth:

Jews are human.

Here is the original post:

Too Jewish For Hollywood: As Antisemitism Soars, Hollywood Should Address Its Enduring Hypocrisy In Hyperbolic Caricatures of Jews - Variety

Moshe’s Leadership, the Rebbe, and the Dilemma of the Modern Jew – Jewish Journal

Posted By on June 19, 2021

This weeks Torah reading contains an exceptionally puzzling passage. We are told about the complaints of the Jews, who are thirsty and worried. Moshe and Aharon are told by God totake the rod and assemble the community, and before their very eyes order the rock to yield its water. Moshe hits the rock twice, and it gives forth a copious amount of water.

Immediately after this miracle, God says to Moshe: Because you have not believed in Me, to sanctify Me in the eyes of the children of Israel, therefore you will not bring this assembly into the land which I have given them.

What did Moshe do wrong? This passage challenges every interpreter. Don Isaac Abravanel mentions eleven interpretations of this passage. And there are yet more. One opinion he cites says perhaps Moshe didnt sin at all, and the Torah is blaming Moshe for the sins of the people. A clear explanation remains elusive.

Rashi offers one of the stranger explanations. He says Moshes sin was hitting the rock after he had been specifically commanded to speak to the rock. Rashi says: For had you spoken to the rock and it had given forth [water], I would have been sanctified in the eyes of the congregation. They would have said, If this rock, which neither speaks nor hears, and does not require sustenance, fulfills the word of the Omnipresent, how much more should we!

Rashis explanation seems more puzzling than the passage itself! The Ramban points out that God had asked Moshe to carry his stick to the rock; wouldnt that imply he was supposed to hit the rock? In addition, considering that the rock is an inanimate object, what difference does it make if he speaks to the rock or hits it?

When you consider the wider context, Rashis explanation is even more perplexing. In a prior section of the Torah (Exodus 17:5-6), Moshe is commanded to produce water for the congregation by hitting a rock. Why would this time be different?

Perhaps the best way to read Rashi is to see this as an allegory on leadership. Moshes audience is not the rock; it is the people. Whether he hits the rock or speaks to it tells us everything about how he will lead the people.

Leaders use different tools to influence their followers, and those methods run on a continuum from coercion to persuasion. Warm words are used to persuade, while a swinging stick is used to coerce. A leader must adjust his methods according to the audience: for certain audiences one needs to carry a big stick, and for others, it is critical to speak softly.

A leader must adjust his methods according to the audience: for certain audiences one needs to carry a big stick, and for others, it is critical to speak softly.

In Moshes early career, he had to be a leader who carried a big stick. When Moshe initially refuses to lead, he says it is because he is not a man of words. The Midrash (Shemot Rabbah 3:14) explains that God responds to Moshe that he doesnt need to speak. In dealing with a dictator like Pharaoh, a man accustomed to the master-slave view of politics, all Moshe needs is a big stick. Pharaoh is not open to persuasion and will only respond to brute force.

Even Moshes leadership of the Jews after leaving Egypt is based on brute force. As former slaves, they respond best to strength and coercion. Similarly, at Mount Sinai, the Talmud says the Jews accept the Torah under duress (Shabbat 88a).

In this context, we can understand why in the Book of Exodus, during the first year in the desert, Moshe is commanded to hit the rock. Moshe must lead a reluctant assembly of former slaves, a people who only know how to respond to coercion; leadership for them requires a powerful show of force.

But the event at Mei Merivah takes place in the 40th year. This is a new generation, born free in the desert. They too must follow; but this is not the time for coercion. Here, a new generation must be convinced to be self-reliant and strong, and that can only be accomplished with persuasion and education.

Rashi incisively leads us to the core of the Mei Merivah issue. In the 40th year in the desert, big stick leadership will diminish the second generations ability to hear Gods voice.

Moshes sin is nearly imperceptible from the text, because it is unique to his situation. As a leader overseeing generational change, he was expected to understand that some generations require the big stick, while others require soft words. And because Moshe cannot pivot to the leadership of speaking softly, another leader must bring the second generation into Eretz Yisrael.

Moshes sin is nearly imperceptible from the text, because it is unique to his situation.

For the last 200 years, Orthodox Jewry has been trying its best to adapt to a new reality. In the medieval era, certain judicial rights were granted to the leadership of the community, and Jewish leadership within the ghetto could certainly pressure and coerce their members into observance. But after the Emancipation gave political rights to the Jews in Western Europe, the ghetto walls came tumbling down, and the position of Orthodoxy diminished.

Many recognized that political rights would change the religious landscape. As Napoleon was marching toward Russia, the rabbis of Russia debated whether they should pray for him to defeat the hated czar, Alexander I. Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liadi, the first Rebbe of Chabad, said that he was praying for the czar to be victorious. He explained that he had seen a vision of the future on Rosh Hashanah, and was shown that if Bonaparte is victorious, the wealth of the Jewish people will be increased and the dignity of Israel will be restored. The hearts of Israel, however, will become more distant from their father in heaven. It would be difficult to lead the Jews into a new world and persuade them to follow in the ways of their ancestors.

Generations later, all Jews would be liberated, and grow more distant from heaven. But the Seventh Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, who passed away 27 years ago this week, was one who understood better than anyone how to adapt the message of Torah to the modern world; and he did so brilliantly, using down-to-earth lessons from baseball and profound insights from physics. He understood that a new vocabulary needed to be used, and that every Jew needed to learn how to reach out to others. Rabbi Joseph Telushkin, in his biography of the Rebbe, begins with a chapter entitled A Rebbe for the New World, a description that recognizes how difficult it is to teach ancient wisdom to a very different generation of Jews. And the Rebbe recognized his mission encompassed all of humanity.

In one of the more powerful stories in the book, Telushkin tells of advice the Rebbe gave to Shirley Chisolm, the newly elected congresswoman from his district. As Telushkin explains, Chisholm was the first black woman elected to Congress. [she] lacked the power to stop senior and influential southern democratic congressmen, many of whom in those days were racists, from assigning her to the agriculture committee, an intentionally absurd appointment for a representative from Brooklyn. Chisholm, who wanted to work on education and labor issues, was both frustrated and furious. She soon received a phone call from the office of one of her constituents: The Lubavitcher Rebbe would like to meet with you. Chisholm came to 770. The Rebbe said: I know youre very upset. Chisholm acknowledged being upset and insulted. What should I do? The Rebbe said: What a blessing God has given you. This country has so much surplus food, and there are so many hungry people and you can use this gift that Gods given you to feed hungry people. Find a creative way to do it.

And so she did. Together with farming state sponsors, Chisholm would introduce the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), which would feed millions of people.

This is just one example of how the Rebbes persuasive leadership would be transformative for Jews and non-Jews alike. Remarkably, a new generation in the new world could still follow a Rebbe, because they were ready for a different kind of leadership.

Rabbi Chaim Steinmetz is the Senior Rabbi of Congregation Kehilath Jeshurun in New York.

Link:

Moshe's Leadership, the Rebbe, and the Dilemma of the Modern Jew - Jewish Journal

We Jews need a real reckoning with our role in American racism – Haaretz

Posted By on June 19, 2021

After a painful year of public violence against American communities of color, the Biden White House is now proposing important changes to how educators should teach the history of racism and the lasting legacies of white supremacy in American schools.

Following President Bidens campaign promise to address the growing acknowledgement of racial inequities, a Department of Educations memo released on April 19 proposes that certain curricula take into account the "systemic marginalization, biases, inequities, and discriminatory policy and practice in American history" that have long been overlooked by generations of white Americans.

Its time we Jews do the same.

In many ways, the American Jewish community has mirrored the modern historical trends of white America. Yet despite this, the communal history we tell is one of liberal exceptionality in comparison to other whites. We emphasize that Jews overwhelmingly vote Democrat, overwhelmingly donate to charity. We narrowly recall our moments of racial liberalism and center them in our historical narrative ("We were once enslaved and endured centuries of antisemitism, thus in America we naturally abhorred Black slavery and racism!")

We praise that Jews were some of the founding members of racially progressive organizations like the NAACP and the ACLU, that we overwhelmingly participated in the Freedom Summer of 1964, that Rabbi Abraham Heschel famously linked arms with Martin Luther King, Jr. as they crossed Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama.

There is good reason to celebrate Jewish civil rights activism, and such moments deserve to be commemorated. Yet the near-exclusive repetition of celebratory episodes have contrived a fanciful image of the American Jewish experience that largely disregards the actual historical record. Likewise, they can be countered by many neglected moments of Jewish racial hostility.

In the nineteenth century, a significant number of prominent rabbis, including the much-lauded Isaac Mayer Wise, failed to condemn slavery (and in some cases, like New Yorks Rabbi Morris Jacob Raphall, delivered sermons that supported southern secession).

While some courageous Jews did travel South to register Black voters in the Civil Rights Era, many others fiercely opposed their intervention. In a remarkable showing of racism, for example, a Jewish White Citizens Council member from Mississippi published a pro-segregationist pamphlet in 1956 entitled "A Jewish View on Segregation," where he maintained that "any white Southerner, Christian or Jew, must do all he can to help maintain segregation."

Such regressive racial politics wasnt just limited to southern Jewish voices: In a survey conducted by the New York Times in 1964, nearly half of Jews in New York were shown to believe that the Civil Rights Movement was moving too quickly and should "slow down."

A nuanced Jewish history goes beyond mere episodes of racial liberalism or bigotry during moments of racial flux (like the Civil War and twentieth-century civil rights). More telling is to study the broader cultural trends of white America that Jews migrated toward, particularly following the Second World War when the majority of Jews achieved middle-class status.

Although the majority of Jews did (and do) vote for liberal political candidates, they also joined the postwar "white flight" from the city to the suburbs, structurally redefining the American racial landscape and leaving Black and Brown inner-cities impoverished.

Faced with issues like school desegregation and busing in the late 1950s and 1960s, Jewish parents likewise embodied the racial separatism of white America. As historian Michael Staub shows, a survey of Jews in Jackson Heights, Queens in 1963 found that only 28 percent favored school desegregation (five percent lower than their Catholic neighbors).

Notable Jewish intellectuals publicly condemned desegregation efforts as well, including the Harvard historian Oscar Handlin and the labor Zionist leader and Brandeis professor Marie Syrkin.

While no doubt wanting to instill Jewish values in their childrens education, the proliferation of private Jewish day schools in the postwar decades was similarly imbued with the reactionary response to desegregation.

In surveys conducted among the parents of non-Orthodox Jewish day school students in Los Angeles in 1977, between a quarter and a third of participants admitted that their decision to enroll their children in private Jewish day schools was influenced by "integration" (about a tenth openly wrote it was to "escape the public school and/or because of busing.")

Much like the Souths "white" or "seg" academies, writes historian David Sorkin in a book on global Jewish emancipation, the private Jewish day school movement "began as a form of religiously legitimized white flight from desegregation."

The Jewish integration into white America and the racial implications which it entailed has long been recognized by Black Americans. Five and a half decades before James Baldwin wrote his now-famous 1967 essay "Negroes Are Anti-Semitic Because Theyre Anti-White," which asserted that Black animosity toward Jews merely reflected a broader frustration toward white Americans, early twentieth-century Black civil rights activist James Weldon Johnson aptly described that:

"[The American Jew] knew that to sanction Negro oppression would be to sanction Jewish oppression, and would expose him to a shot along that line from the old soldier, who stood firmly on the ground of equal rights and opportunity to all men; yet long traditions and business instincts told him, when in Rome to act as a Roman."

More than we generally embrace, acting as a Roman in this case, aligning with other whites has been the dominant story of American Jewry.

While we should celebrate and promote our moments of racial liberalism, we must not cherry-pick from the more widespread history of a population that integrated into the white side of racial divide, which in turn perpetuated lasting damage against communities of color. In doing so, we erase our responsibility from the continuing legacy of American racism.

Jacob Morrow-Spitzer is a PhD student in the Department of History at Yale University, where he researches modern Jewish history with an emphasis on American Jews, politics, and race. His most recent work was an investigation of shifting Black perceptions of Jews in the American South since the time of slavery. Twitter: @Morrow_Spitzer

This article was shaped by conversations with the Yale University Slifka Centers Judaism and Race Working Group, and comments from Rabbi Jason Rubenstein, Rabbi Isaama Goldstein-Stoll, and Dalia Moallem

Read the original:

We Jews need a real reckoning with our role in American racism - Haaretz

Secretary Blinken’s Travel to Germany, France, Italy, and the Vatican | US Embassy & Consulates in Italy – US Embassy Rome

Posted By on June 19, 2021

Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken will travel to Berlin, Paris, Rome, the Vatican, Bari, and Matera, June 22-29.

In Berlin, the Secretary will attend the Second Berlin Conference on Libya to support national elections in December and the withdrawal of foreign forces. While in Berlin, Secretary Blinken will meet with Chancellor Angela Merkel and Foreign Minister Heiko Maas to highlight the importance of the U.S.-Germany relationship in addressing common challenges and priorities. He will also meet with Libyan and other foreign leaders on the margins of the Conference on Libya to discuss mutual concerns. In Berlin, Secretary Blinken and Foreign Minister Maas will underscore our shared commitment to combatting anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial and distortion and to finding innovative new ways to enhance Holocaust education.

In Paris on June 25, Secretary Blinken will meet with President Emmanuel Macron and Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian to deepen the strong U.S.-France relationship, highlight our shared values, and discuss areas of cooperation, including global security and recovering from the pandemic. The Secretary will also meet with OECD Secretary General Mathias Cormann to discuss key economic priorities, international taxation, and U.S. chairmanship of the 60th anniversary Ministerial Council Meeting in October.

In Rome, Secretary Blinken and Italian Foreign Minister Luigi Di Maio will co-chair a meeting of the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS. On the margins of the D-ISIS meeting, the Secretary will participate in a Syria Ministerial to discuss the crisis in Syria and underscore the importance of meeting humanitarian needs. He will also have bilateral meetings with President Sergio Mattarella and Foreign Minister Di Maio to underscore the U.S.-Italy partnerships important role in addressing key global priorities. Secretary Blinken will also visit Vatican City, where he will meet with senior Holy See officials to underscore our shared commitment to freedom of religion or belief and tackling the climate crisis.

Finally, in Bari and Matera, the Secretary will join foreign ministers at the G20 Foreign Ministers Meeting to reinforce the U.S. commitment to multilateralism and discuss continued cooperation in combatting the COVID-19 pandemic, addressing the climate crisis, and building back better with our global partners, with a focus on Africa.

Excerpt from:

Secretary Blinken's Travel to Germany, France, Italy, and the Vatican | US Embassy & Consulates in Italy - US Embassy Rome

Grading Facebook one year after the brand boycott – AdAge.com

Posted By on June 19, 2021

It's been one year since more than 1,000brands boycotted Facebook in an effort to stop hate speech. Since then, the civil rights groups behind the movement say while progress has been made to better secure social media from racism, some of the issues that initially propelled the protest have actually gotten worse.

Over the past year Facebook has made strides in cleaning up the platform, including unprecedented brandy safety tests in New Feed, yet marketers say they are watching the social behemoth closely to make sure it delivers on its promises.

On Thursday, the Anti-Defamation League, one of the founding organizers of Stop Hate along with the NAACP, issued a report looking back on the year, grading Facebook on how wellor notit fulfilled commitments like purging hate speech and disinformation.

Issues that we raised 12 months ago, we made meaningful progress, says Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO at the ADL. For the first time, Facebook agreed to a series of what I would describe as concessions, where they finally made an explicit effort to take down white supremacist groups, to remove racist content, to classify Holocaust denialism as hate speech. They hired a VPof civil rights;they agreed to participate in an audit of their hate content.

Facebook still saw its share of problems over the year, like the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, which was in part caused by hatespread on the platform. Greenblatt says hate also still finds a voice in anti-Semitism and white supremacism.

Its become very clear that the concerns that we raised, despite [Facebooks] protestations and despite their pushback, the issues that we raised have only increased in urgency," Greenblatt says."The things that we flagged have actually flourished on their services.

Aba Blankson, NAACP chief marketing and communications officer, said that Stop Hate prodded brands to take responsibility for the platforms they support, and it showed that concerted action works. Brands have the immensepowerto hold each other accountable,and urgent responsibility to drive meaningful change, Blankson said in an email.

Major brands not only joined the campaign to pause, but examined how their marketing and advertising dollars were being used on social platforms, primarily Facebook, and changed internal advertising policies as a result, Blankson said. While Facebook and other platforms updated their policies to mitigate hate and misinformation, they still have more work to do in enforcing those policies in a timely and consistent manner.

The boycott wound up recruiting more than 1,000 brands, including Verizon, Coca-Cola, Unilever, Honda, North Face, and more. Ad agencies and brands were motivated to act following the police killing of George Floyd last May, when social media became a battleground between civil rights champions and hategroups.

The account of then President Donald Trump became an example of how the most powerful accounts could stoke violence. Trump posted messages suggesting Black Lives Matter protesters should be met with an armed response.

Trumps accounts on Facebook and Twitter were ultimately banned following the Jan. 6 attack on Congress.

With more than 10 million advertisers, the boycott did not harm Facebooks bottom line. In fact, Facebooks ad revenue grew 21% in 2020 to $84 billion.

Facebook has been working with the Global Alliance for Responsible Media to implement rules around hate speech, enforcing community standards, and protecting brands. This year, Facebook agreed to test a way for advertisers to control where they appear in News Feed. Facebook has 1.88 billion daily users who all receive a personalized, algorithm-based content feed. For years, Facebook told advertisers that context in News Feed, where ads appear above and below user-generated posts, did not matter.

Theyre giving advertisers controls, which was literally the first ask, and that represents an incredible change in position, says Ben Hovaness, senior VP, marketplace intelligence, Omnicom Media Group.

Major brands have expressed concerns about the pace of audits, though, whichFacebook assured them would help quantify the risks on social media.

Facebook has said it is committed to implementing standards set by GARM, the industry group, and willallow audits of how well it complies with those standards. But Facebook has yet to incorporate GARMs standards, partly because they are not finalized around content monetization and brand safety controls, the company said.

Facebook also is opening its Community Standards Enforcement Report to an audit by Ernst & Young. The enforcement report details the level of offensive content on Facebook, and brands want to verify the findings that Facebook self-reports.

This week, Marc Pritchard, Procter & Gambles chief brand officer, referenced the GARM standards and Facebook in a talk with Ad Age at the Association of National Advertisers conference.

When I say there are still challenges that is one of them, Pritchard said. The GARM safety and suitability standards, that was an expectation that we put to all platforms, and we expected adoption, and then we expected the MRC audit of that as well as coming up with new monetization approaches. One of the challenges is that the MRC auditing is still not in place. And that's important to us, and I think it's important to the industry.

Facebook pointed to all the actions it has taken in the past year, including hiring a civil rights executive, which was a core demand of protesters.

Over the past year, we hired Roy L. Austin, Jr. to serve as Facebooks first VP of Civil Rights and continued to grow our team of civil rights experts. Weve made substantial investments to keep hate off our platform and have updated our policies to catch more implicit hate speech and banned Holocaust denial, aFacebook spokesman said. Before the U.S. election last year, we also banned militarized social movements, took down tens of thousands of QAnon pages, groups, and accounts, and updated our policies prohibiting voter suppression. We hold ourselves accountable through regular reports to the public on the progress were making and areas where we need to do more. While there is always more work to do, we are committed to doing it.

Facebooks advertising leadership has changed in the past year, as well. Just last week, Carolyn Everson, head of global business solutions, left the company. Everson had been one of the most active executives working with advertisers directly to ensure changes to the platforms.

Pritchard discussed Eversons departure, too. The mark of a great leader is the team that steps up behind them, Pritchard told Ad Age. And I have confidence in them.

Originally posted here:

Grading Facebook one year after the brand boycott - AdAge.com


Page 765«..1020..764765766767..770780..»

matomo tracker