Page 803«..1020..802803804805..810820..»

Charles Grodin and the Jewish question – Religion News Service

Posted By on May 20, 2021

Charles Grodin, one of cinemas most accomplished comic actors, has died at the age of 86.

For me, the quintessential Charles Grodin performance was his role of Lenny Cantrow, the newly-married bridegroom, in the 1972 original film version of The Heartbreak Kid, with Jeannie Berlin, Cybill Shepherd, and the late Eddie Albert.

The movie is the story of a Jewish couple on their honeymoon in Miami Beach. Lenny (Grodin) is a New Yorker, clearly Jewish, as is his bride, Lila, played by Jeannie Berlin. When Lila suffers an excruciating sunburn, Lenny meets and falls in love with Kelly, a beautiful Midwestern girl, played by Cybill Shepherd.

The Heartbreak Kid was a very Jewish film. The creators of the film constituted the better part of a minyan. Elaine May (the mother of Jeannie Berlin) directed the film. Grodin and Berlin starred in the film. Neil Simon wrote the screenplay. Bruce Jay Friedman wrote the short story, A Change of Plan, upon which the film was based. Edgar J. Scherick produced the film. Hal David and Burt Bacharach wrote the music.

But, more than that. The Heartbreak Kid (watch it here) is a meditation on the American Jewish condition a crucial aspect of the story that the 2007 Farrelly brothers remake ignored, and about which its original creators might not even have been fully aware.

When Lenny first encounters Kelly on the beach in Miami Beach, he is lying on his towel. She approaches him and says: Thats my spot. Youre lying in my spot. Everybody knows that. Lenny: I just got here. Kelly: Never mind. Just dont do it again. With this, she runs off into the surf.

Commentary: The date is 1972. By then, Miami Beach had become the Garden of Eden for Jewish vacationers (as in, the Eden Roc Hotel). Likewise, for Jewish residents, especially Holocaust survivors.

But, as recently as the 1940s, Miami Beach had not been overtly friendly to Jews. Hotels advertised strictly Gentile clientele. Restrictions against Jews in some country clubs persisted until way after 1972.

Yes, the whole scene is deliberately flirtatious. And, perhaps that is all it was no antisemitism intended.

Even still, the notion that youre lying in my spot sends a subtle, even unintended signal and subtext: This [this piece of sand/Miami Beach/this country] is my spot [culturally, ethnically, religiously not yours.] Everybody knows that [it is built into the very premises of our culture].

Lennys response I just got here is itself loaded with subtext. I just got here my grandparents just got to this country. We are newcomers and parvenus.

Kelly takes Lenny to a rural cabin for a romantic rendezvous. She seduces Lenny into a coy, teasing game. They both get naked, and she tells him that they must stand together as closely as possible without touching.

To which Lenny responds: I love it! All my life, I wanted to be in a place like this, with a girl like you, playing a game like this! To which she responds, shyly: I dont know if I can go through with it.

Commentary: This was more than a game. This was about how little game about how it seemed that America had teased the Jews, seducing us with success and security.

America is home sort of. Because, at the last possible second, she says: I dont know if I can go through with it.

Translation: I dont know if I can really let you the Jew, the minority, the immigrant into my space.

At the end of the film, Lenny has gotten his girl. He is married in a chapel with a cross over his head. His face is streaked with sadness as if he has begun to discern what his romantic ambition has wrought.

American Jews are not making movies like this anymore. Why not?

How much so? Consider the audience for Shtisel. It is far from being a Jewish-only phenomenon. There are many gentiles who are binging on this story of a hareidi family in Jerusalem, and who are asking respectful, curious questions about that culture.

I do not miss the world of The Heartbreak Kid.

But, I will miss Charles Grodin.

May he rest in peace.

Add to Favorite Articles

More here:

Charles Grodin and the Jewish question - Religion News Service

Fact Check-Video of people tearing clothes in Jerusalem shows a Jewish custom and is not linked to the 2021 Hamas-Israel conflict – Reuters

Posted By on May 20, 2021

Footage showing three people wearing torn shirts has been falsely linked to the ongoing violence between Israel and Hamas, and is falsely said to show Israelis who later pretended they were attacked by Palestinians. However, the video is several years old and shows people conducting a traditional Jewish custom known as tearing kriah.

The video has been viewed by thousands of social media users and begins with a man tearing the shirt of a woman, before tearing his own. The camera pans to show a child who is also wearing a torn shirt. An adult male standing nearby then asks the person filming to stop because they are outside Temple Mount (here , here , here and here).

Fiction features heavily in the world of Zionist Israel, wrote one Facebook user on May 15 in an accompanying caption. Israelis in Jerusalem are tearing their clothes so as to make it look like they are the victims of an attack by Palestinians LOL, They can be an actresses and actors now.

Other Facebook users have made similar comments.

Violence between Israel and Hamas militants has rapidly escalated since May 10, killing hundreds of people the majority of whom were Palestinian (here).

However, the video circulating on social media is at least three years old (here and here), while claims that the subjects pretended they were attacked appears to be a false assumption made upon an initial misunderstanding of the videos context.

All three of the videos subjects have a similar tear from the neckline of their shirts and downwards. In Jewish custom, this is known as tearing kriah (here and bit.ly/3fz6yCD).

Kriah is generally performed as a sign of mourning a family member; however, some Jews also tear kriah upon seeing Temple Mount, the holiest site in Judaism (here , here and bit.ly/3fvTJsD). Shirts especially for the occasion have in the past also been sold or distributed nearby (here and here).

False. The video is at least three years old and shows three people performing a Jewish custom at the holiest site in Judaism.

This article was produced by the Reuters Fact Check team. Read more about our fact-checkingworkhere .

See more here:

Fact Check-Video of people tearing clothes in Jerusalem shows a Jewish custom and is not linked to the 2021 Hamas-Israel conflict - Reuters

Members of Jewish synagogue come together after act of vandalism – KVOA Tucson News

Posted By on May 20, 2021

TUCSON (KVOA) - An act of vandalism overnight at an eastside synagogue had members believing it was an act of hatred.

With the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians in the middle east, this Jewish community believes others see it as an invitation to attack them.

A large rock was thrown through the front door of Chaverim Synagogue Tuesday night. However, instead of shrinking away in fear, over 50 members of this synagogue came out to support one another.

Members believe this was a targeted attack.

"I love Tucson, it's my community and I never expected this to happen here, Arizona Democratic Representative Alma Hernandez said. "But, at the same time, I'm not surprised with what's going on right now."

Hernandez and Rabbi Stephanie Aaron said they were in tears when they learned what happened.

The rabbi was upset and startled and said she has trouble understanding this type of hatred.

"I really felt very shattered; I felt very violated for my community and I felt very sad," Aaron said.

Tonight was not about responding to one act of hate with another. Instead, it was to come together and support each other.

But the congregation is not dismissing that they believe this broken door was intentional.

"We would be lying to ourselves if we said this was a coincidence, and it just happened," Hernandez said. "Right now it's just a rock, and they just broke our window, but I don't wanna know what's next."

The leaders of this congregation do not want the Jewish community to be afraid. They want their members and others to stand up against prejudice, bigotry, violence and hatred.

Wednesday night, was this groups attempt to do just that.

"Our safe place, our place of shalom was ruptured, and yet this is really the first step to begin to heal it," said Aaron.

A report was filed with the Tucson Police Department about the vandalism. No suspects have been arrested.

Representative Hernandez says the synagogue does not have a surveillance system.

The rest is here:

Members of Jewish synagogue come together after act of vandalism - KVOA Tucson News

There are more American Jews and they’re staying Jewish – thejewishchronicle.net

Posted By on May 20, 2021

The Pew Research Center last week released a report of its survey, Jewish Americans in 2020. The new study of the size and character of U.S. Jewry coincidentally appeared just as Jews around the world prepared to celebrate Shabbat Bamidbar when we read the Book of Numbers description of the census of the Israelites in the desert. A scientific survey is not a census but does serve a similar function of providing a portrait of a community and highlighting its strengths and weaknesses.

Pews snapshot of the U.S. Jewish community indicates that it is growing in size and diversity, with its members finding different paths to express their cultural, ethnic and religious identities. Much of the discussion of the study will likely focus on how contemporary Jews differ from one another, but that framing misses a central finding. Contrary to the popular narrative of the vanishing American Jew, the U.S. Jewish population is actually expanding. U.S. Jews exhibit a wide range of attitudes and practices, but they have not shed their Jewish identities.

Pew estimates there are currently 7.5 million American Jews, made up of 5.8 million adults and 1.7 million children, representing 2.4% of the overall U.S. population (roughly the same proportion since 1990). This estimate represents a double-digit increase since 2013, when Pew estimated the total Jewish population at 6.7 million, and a nearly 40% increase in the population estimated in 1990 by National Jewish Population Survey.

Get The Jewish Chronicle Weekly Edition by email and never miss our top storiesFree Sign Up

The estimate reported by Pew is corroborated by my own work with colleagues at Brandeis Universitys American Jewish Population Project. Using data synthesis techniques, which enable us to analyze individual data from hundreds of high quality surveys and nearly 1.5 million respondents, we estimate the 2020 U.S. Jewish population at 7.6 million. Our higher estimate is, in part, the result of our using more recent census data.

The total population measure is based on two threshold issues concerning respondents religious backgrounds and current religious identification. Pew, like most who study American Jewry, identified Jews by asking two kinds of questions: What, if any, is your religion? and, for those who are agnostic, atheist, or do not identify with a religion, Do you consider yourself Jewish in some other way? All respondents were asked about their upbringing and their parents backgrounds. To be included in the Jewish population, they had to have a Jewish parent or had converted.

Based on those responses, Pew classified one group Jews by religion (JBRs) and the other Jews not by religion (JNRs). Nearly 75% of the adult Jewish population was identified as JBRs and the remainder JNRs. The share of the JNR population appears to be increasing, particularly among young Jews, although other research suggests that the proportion of the U.S. population who are JBRs has remained stable (1.9%).

Raising Jewish childrenPews estimate of the number of children is based on the report of an adult respondent. Children are counted as Jewish if they are part of the household of a Jewish parent and are being raised in some way Jewish. Of an estimated 2.4 million children living in Jewish households, 1.6 million were counted as Jewish. Most (75%) of these children are being raised exclusively Jewish by religion, and the remainder are being raised as Jewish in some other way.

The sociological approach used by Pew to identify who is Jewish is imperfect, but yields a conservative estimate of the total Jewish population. The approach excludes nearly three million individuals of Jewish background who dont consider themselves Jewish; some identify with another religion, others with no religion.

Along with natural population growth, immigration, and wider access to Jewish education, intermarriage is having a net positive effect. Compared to earlier generations, more Jews appear to be retaining their Jewish identity when they marry a non-Jew, and an increasing number of intermarried couples are raising Jewish children. All of these factors contribute to the expanding Jewish population.

Undoubtedly, some will question Pews decisions about who should be counted as a Jew. Long before scientific survey research evolved, Jewish sages wrestled with the question of how to count Jews and assess our strength in numbers. Thus, last Shabbat, the Torah reading about the Biblical census was accompanied by a Haftarah reading from the Book of Hosea that teaches us that the people of Israel shall be like the sands of the sea, which cannot be measured or counted.

Jewish tradition reconciles the difficulty of counting with the necessity of assessing the strength of the community by allowing indirect counts. Surveys provide communal organizations with a sense of the magnitude of their responsibility to the community and a yardstick with which to gauge the effectiveness of their efforts. The survey provides an objective way to assess the size of the community.

Pews report should calm the fears of those who believed that Judaism in America would all but disappear. The study, buttressed by other data, affirms that Jewish identity remains important to the vast majority of an enlarged U.S. Jewish population. Rather than vanishing, American Jews have constructed a multiplicity of ways to express their Jewishness. The challenge posed by the findings is how to provide a wide range of opportunities for the increasing number of individuals seeking meaningful connections within the Jewish world.PJC

Leonard Saxe, Ph.D, is the Klutznick Professor of Contemporary Jewish Studies and Social Policy at Brandeis University. This piece first appeared on The Times of Israel.

See the rest here:

There are more American Jews and they're staying Jewish - thejewishchronicle.net

Rise in antisemitic incidents in Florida prompts Jewish groups to spend thousands on security – WTXL ABC 27

Posted By on May 20, 2021

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. (WTXL) Harassment, vandalism, assault and even Zoom meetings have been disrupted by graphic and racist messages.

Antisemitism has been on the rise in America, and Florida is seeing a surge in incidents, causing a rise in the costs of security.

RELATED: Antisemitic incidents remain at high levels, according to ADL report

From Boca Raton to Tequesta, Palm Beach County is home to the most Jewish Americans in South Florida, and the population is increasing rapidly.

"We're seeing a strong Jewish community growing in Boynton, Palm Beach Gardens, Jupiter," said Rabbi Andrew Rosenkranz.

WPTV

But according to the Anti-Defamation League, Florida is now also home to the fourth most antisemitic incidents in the United States.

"We went out to investigate, and it wasn't just one, but it was many and multiple," Rosenkranz said.

Earlier this year, Rosenkranz said swastikas were found drawn on windows of a vacant restaurant in Wellington located around the corner from his synagogue, Temple Beth Torah.

"When you see a symbol like that, and you're a member of a community that it's directed towards, you know there are people out there who hate you," Rosenkranz.

The ADL just released its audit of antisemitic incidents, which says Florida saw a 40 percent increase in 2020 compared to 2019.

WPTV

The ADL's H.E.A.T. (Hate, Extremism, Antisemitism, Terrorism) Map shows most of the incidents happening in South Florida.

"In the last three years, we have seen the highest numbers of antisemitic incidents targeting the Jewish community since we started recording the audit in 1979," said Yael Hershfied, interim regional director of the ADL's Florida office.

She said the lockdown at the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic did not prevent the hate, and those who pedal it started infiltrating new spaces.

"For example, Shabbat services at synagogues that were being held over Zoom, and we learned this new term now -- Zoombombing. It was being infiltrated by haters," Hershfied said.

WPTV

A new Pew Research Center report released this month not only shows the rise in antisemitism, but it also said more than half of Jewish Americans feel less safe than five years ago.

Now, Jewish institutions and synagogues are making upgrades and spending a significant amount of money on security.

"Over the past two years we have brought in about $700,000 in federal funding to go to about a dozen or so different Jewish institutions to support things like panic buttons, cameras on the outside," said Michael Hoffman, the President & CEO at Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County.

Hoffman said five years ago security spending was minimal. But now it's working with the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, FEMA and local law enforcement to ensure everyone's safety while also investing in education to combat antisemitism.

WPTV

"Over $600,000 is being spent on an annual basis to help support the community advocacy and educational needs in our community," Hoffman said.

Rosenkranz said hate is a learned trait. He teaches love and tolerance, and although it's a strain on the budget, he said he cannot afford not to also focus on security.

"We now have the ritual of a bar mitzvah, we have the ritual of a wedding ceremony, we have the Jewish ritual of a funeral. Now, we have the ritual of security," Rosenkranz.

Related Links:

View original post here:

Rise in antisemitic incidents in Florida prompts Jewish groups to spend thousands on security - WTXL ABC 27

Are the Jews being attacked in Israels mixed cities victims of pogroms – The Jerusalem Post

Posted By on May 20, 2021

The term pogrom is unfortunately back in our lexicon.Last week, Israeli President Reuven Rivlin described attacks by a bloodthirsty Arab mob in the mixed Jewish-Arab city of Lod as a pogrom. A Jewish vigilante in Lod told The Washington Post that he was defending its Jewish residents from a pogrom.

On the other side, when a video captured Jewish rioters beating what they took to be an Arab man in Bat Yam, a Pakistani writer tweeted, This is what a pogrom looks like.

So what exactly is a pogrom? And are Jews the inevitable, exclusive victims?

Its been over a century since the Russian word pogrom entered the English language, but the civil unrest in Israel is unfortunately bringing the term back into current usage.

The New York Times, using the Yiddish plural pogromen,first cited the term in 1882 to describe the wave of anti-Jewish violence that followed the assassination of Czar Alexander II, and provided a helpful inline definition: riots against the Jews.

The Slavic root of the term, derived from the evocative word to thunder, adds tone but otherwise gives little indication of its meaning. Pogrom was one of many words, including riot, upheaval and disorderly conduct, used to describe the horrific attacks that plagued Jewish villages in the Russian Empire from 1881 to 1884 as transient Russian workers rode the rails from shtetl to shtetl, stopping at every station to beat, rape and occasionally murder.

cnxps.cmd.push(function () { cnxps({ playerId: '36af7c51-0caf-4741-9824-2c941fc6c17b' }).render('4c4d856e0e6f4e3d808bbc1715e132f6'); });

In the wake of the violence, some 1.75 million Eastern European Jews migrated to the United States, the numbers tapering off only in the 1920s when restrictive immigration quotas were imposed. The term pogrom migrated with them, from Russian to Yiddish to English.

In the late 19th century, many Jewish activists believed that Alexander III, the new czar, had given his blessing to the pogroms by directing police to turn a blind eye to the violence. This view was famously captured in Sholom Aleichems writings and in the musical Fiddler on the Roof, based on his stories, when the local police chief lets Tevye in on the secret plans for an upcoming pogrom.

Toward the end of the 20th century, archival research led historians to dismiss that interpretation of the pogroms. The 1881-1884 pogroms were not organized by the bureaucratically inept Russian government, which viewed the uncontrollable violence as a threat to the stability of the regime as a whole.

By contrast, the far more brutal pogroms of the 20th century, including the notorious Kishinev pogrom of 1903 and the bloody pogroms that engulfed Ukraine during the chaos that followed World War I, showed much clearer signs of coordination by authorities at various levels. The last czar, Nicholas II, tacitly encouraged the violence by openly supporting the violent Black Hundreds organization and even underwriting the publication of the antisemitic work The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

The definition of the word pogrom thus has come to include three essential elements: a violent mob, Jewish victimhood and at least the appearance of some level of central planning or incitement, although the attacks themselves seem more spontaneous.

Although the word pogrom first emerged in the late 19th century, it was later applied anachronistically to incidents in the distant past. Social upheavals directed against Jews are virtually as old as Jewish history itself, with the street violence of Alexandria, Egypt, in the year 38 C.E. considered the earliest example.

Throughout the medieval period, a combination of religious fervor and bloodlust motivated ordinary citizens to rise up and attack Jews in hundreds of crusades, blood libels and false charges of host desecration, often with the tacit or explicit approval of ruling authorities.

The term pogrom is rarely used to describe the events of the Holocaust, on quantitative and qualitative grounds: The Nazis murdered millions in a hierarchical, organized and bureaucratic manner unlike the erratic and spontaneous attacks by pogromists. Nevertheless, certain specific incidents from World War II might qualify, such as the notorious Petliura Days of Lviv or the massacres of the Jews of Jedwabne. Kristallnacht, the night of broken glass that presaged the genocide, is often described as a pogrom.

The word may be borrowed for other purposes the authoritative Oxford English Dictionary relates a few citations but they often sound wrong, like dark examples of cultural appropriation. Non-Jewish populations often suffered very similar attacks Mennonites were horribly brutalized by anarchist bands in Ukraine, for example, and their woes compounded by deeply held pacifist beliefs that prevented self-defense but pogrom is deeply rooted in Jewish history and narrative, no less than intifada is rooted in the Palestinian narrative.

Two of the classic elements of the historical pogrom are sadly present in the streets of some Israeli cities, namely mob violence and Jewish victims. The appearance of central planning, however, is hard to identify, and the term doesnt account for the fact that the government and law enforcement are predisposed to defend Israels Jewish citizens. Historically, pogroms are synonymous with Jewish powerlessness. Is it possible to speak of a pogrom when the state authorities responsible for maintaining public order are Jewish?

The debate is similar to the ones over how to describe urban unrest in this country: Are they race riots? Rebellions? Police riots? Uprisings?

Perhaps none of this discussion is helpful from a practical standpoint. When neighbors rise up and physically assault each other, especially after decades of peaceful coexistence, perhaps it doesnt really matter what term we use to describe the violence.

Go here to see the original:

Are the Jews being attacked in Israels mixed cities victims of pogroms - The Jerusalem Post

Most US kids of intermarriage raised Jewish; parents want institutions to notice – The Times of Israel

Posted By on May 20, 2021

JTA Years ago, Jodi Bromberg met a woman at a Jewish event who said she had to call 65 rabbis before she found one who would officiate at her wedding to her non-Jewish husband.

It was a story Bromberg understood. Brombergs wife is Catholic, and earlier in their marriage it was a struggle, she said, to find a synagogue that was the right fit for their family.

Sixteen years after getting together with her wife, Bromberg hasnt left Judaism. Her family is active in their nondenominational Massachusetts synagogue, and Bromberg is the CEO of 18Doors, an organization that helps interfaith families find a place in Jewish life. She knows, though, that there are other families like hers who gave up on trying to fit into a Jewish community.

The number of times that we hear stories about people being rejected outright because their family has said something untoward, or these microaggressions around being a member of an interfaith couple or an interfaith family that often happen in Jewish life and institutions, thats where the work has to be done, Bromberg said. Were still here, but there are lots of folks who arent because they thought, you know what, its not worth it.

Bromberg and her wife are part of a growing group of interfaith couples who are trying to assert themselves in a community where some view families like theirs as an urgent threat to the continued survival of the American Jewish community. Jewish leaders once assumed that Jews who intermarried, and their children, would be forever lost to the Jewish people. At a 1991 conference of the Jewish federations, intermarriage was compared to the Holocaust.

Get The Times of Israel's Daily Edition by email and never miss our top storiesFree Sign Up

But intermarried Jews and the scholars who study them say that isnt the case, that they largely want to remain part of the Jewish world and raise their children in the Jewish community. Now, data from the Pew Research Centers new study on American Jews backs up that contention.

According to the study, most Jews who have married in the past decade have wed non-Jewish partners. But most current intermarried couples with children are raising those children Jewish, with another 12% raising their kids partly Jewish.

All together, the study found, two-thirds of intermarried couples are raising their kids with some Jewish identity, a rate that seems to have risen over time. In addition, nearly half of adults under 50 with one Jewish parent still identify as Jewish.

Illustrative photo of a wedding. (Shutterstock via JTA)

For intermarried families and their advocates, all of those numbers suggest that doomsaying about intermarriage is inappropriate and that efforts to make Jewish communities more inclusive of interfaith families may be paying off.

Intermarriage and Jewish identity transmission are not mutually exclusive, said Keren McGinity, a professor who was the inaugural director of the Interfaith Families Jewish Engagement graduate program at Hebrew College in suburban Boston. Younger adult [children] of intermarried parents by definition would have been born more recently and would have experienced the influences of those who were advocating for a more nuanced, and better, and more accurate understanding of intermarriage.

That influence has been widely felt outside of Orthodoxy, which strictly forbids intermarriage. Major Jewish institutions have shifted their attitudes, and many now actively reach out to interfaith families. The Reform movement, which represents more than a third of US Jews, accepts intermarried families and its rabbis conduct intermarriages.

Intermarriage and Jewish identity transmission are not mutually exclusive

While the Reform movement recognizes children born of either a Jewish father or mother as Jewish, the Conservative and Orthodox movements recognize only matrilineal descent, one potential barrier to including interfaith families.

But the Conservative movement, home to 17% of American Jews, has recently taken steps to be more inclusive, allowing non-Jews to be synagogue members and, in 2018, allowing its rabbis to attend interfaith weddings, though they still cant officiate at them. Most recently it hired McGinity as its interfaith specialist, tasked with helping rabbis and congregations be more welcoming to intermarried couples.

When a Jew marries someone of another faith or cultural background, their identity can be cast into high relief, McGinity said. Being the only Jewish parent in a relationship, she said, gives them the potential to strengthen their own identity.

In a sign of the changing times, two years ago, a range of American and Israeli leaders criticized Israels former education minister for repeating the intermarriage-Holocaust comparison.

Illustrative: Outgoing Education Minister Rafi Peretz at a ceremony held at the Education Ministry in Jerusalem on May 18, 2020. (Olivier Fitoussi/Flash90)

The Pew study did find differences in the Jewish identities of children raised by intermarried parents compared to those of children whose parents are both Jewish. Couples in which both spouses were Jewish, the survey found, raise their children Jewish at higher rates than intermarried couples, and more often with the markers that Pew associates with religious affinity.

Nearly all children of in-married Jewish couples, 93%, are being raised with a Jewish religious identity. Among intermarried couples, 28% are raising their kids with a Jewish religious identity, while an additional 29% are raising their kids as what Pew calls Jews of no religion, or secular Jews.

Bromberg said the relatively low numbers of kids of intermarriage raised Jewish by religion speaks to how unwelcoming Jewish religious spaces have historically been.

But Samira Mehta, who studies interfaith families, said the causality works in the other direction: The Jews who intermarry were less likely to practice religion to begin with.

Illustrative: A display in the Ashdod Big Fashion Mall complex includes a menorah and a Christmas tree. (Courtesy)

For a lot of people, part of the reason that it doesnt seem like a big deal to marry across religious lines is because youre not somebody who really wants to necessarily orient your life around that kind of religious belonging, said Mehta, the author of Beyond Chrismukkah: The Christian-Jewish Interfaith Family in the United States. I dont think the problem is interfaith couples. I think the question is whether synagogues and, quite frankly, churches are doing a good job of helping people understand why it is that they are relevant in contemporary society.

At the same time, she said, younger Jewish adults who marry non-Jews or those are from interfaith families may be more eager to identify as Jewish than previous generations because Jewishness allows them to feel distinct in the United States. Older adults, by contrast, were raised to believe in the United States as a melting pot that prized assimilation.

For people over 50, really the goal in a lot of ways was to assimilate, Mehta said. But for those of us under 50, who were raised in the era of identity politics and multiculturalism, this gave you a way of being an ethnic American.

Some intermarried Jews who are raising Jewish kids still celebrate Christian holidays in some form, like family Christmas dinners or Easter egg hunts.

I think there are a lot of people who identify as just Jewish but who have traditions around Christmas or other holidays. That doesnt feel like a conflict

I think there are a lot of people who identify as just Jewish but who have traditions around Christmas or other holidays, said Rabbi Denise Handlarski, a secular humanist rabbi in Toronto who is intermarried and raising her children Jewish. That doesnt feel like a conflict.

Mehta said intermarried couples who celebrate Christmas and Easter may feel that it doesnt get in the way of raising Jewish kids because those holidays are so ingrained in American culture. In other words, reading Charles Dickens A Christmas Carol in December may be seen as a normal American thing to do as opposed to an active expression of Christian identity.

Having a seder feels like participating in Judaism, she said. If youre doing Christmas with Dickens and not with the Gospel of Luke, youre likely to say, Were not teaching our kids Christianity.

Regardless of what intermarried families do in December, the survey numbers show that the right approach is to actively involve them in Jewish community, said Len Saxe, director of Brandeis Universitys Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies. The dire predictions, he said, have not been borne out.

It hasnt been the end of Jewish life, said Saxe, who advised on the Pew study. And what we see is that when we provide people with meaningful experiences, with education and so on, they engage in Judaism. They raise Jewish children.

See the original post here:

Most US kids of intermarriage raised Jewish; parents want institutions to notice - The Times of Israel

The total collapse of Jewish and Israeli PR – opinion – The Jerusalem Post

Posted By on May 20, 2021

From the beginning of my rabbinic career, I focused mightily on public relations and disseminating the Jewish message to the world. I was accused of being publicity-hungry and of shallowness. But I knew that the one area where we Jews have so significantly failed was in public relations. And this has been true throughout the centuries.Only one nation has ever been accused of murdering God: The Jews. And our inability to properly respond to so heinous a charge how can anyone murder an infinitely power being brought centuries of devastation to our people. Then they accused us of being vampires, of murdering Christian children to suck out their blood. No other nation has faced a similar blood libel, which led to the spilling of countless quantities of Jewish blood.Now Israel is fighting a genocidal enemy in Hamas, a bloodthirsty death cult with a genocidal charter calling for the extermination of Jews wherever they may be found, including in the United States, Europe and Australia.Hamas aids and abets honor killings of Palestinian women whose only crime is to have a boyfriend. They slaughter LGBT Palestinians. They are ruthless and brutal to the wider Palestinian population, robbing them of the international funds sent to give them a better life and using those funds instead to fire rockets at Jews, to murder as many of them as they can.You would think that the choice here between good and evil would be stark and direct and that the world would stand with Israel. But precisely the opposite has occurred, as Israel is now being portrayed as trying to erase the Palestinian people.TAKE THE example of Mohamed Hadid, the multi-millionaire father of supermodels Bella and Gigi Hadid, all of whom are vilifying Israel with gusto to their tens of millions of followers on Instagram. Last week he actually wrote, No one should be allowed to erase a race you cant close your eyes the Pope did in WW1 and WW!! And the rest of the world stood by silently.This is the ultimate blood libel, falsely accusing Israel, the only free society in the Middle East, of genocide. Hadid shockingly compares the Holocaust of six million Jews to Israel fighting back against the Hamas rockets intent on murdering children. It takes an incredible audacity to accuse the Jews of perpetrating a Holocaust of the Palestinians. This antisemitic blood libel about the Jewish people should be rejected by all people who value truth and human rights.

cnxps.cmd.push(function () { cnxps({ playerId: '36af7c51-0caf-4741-9824-2c941fc6c17b' }).render('4c4d856e0e6f4e3d808bbc1715e132f6'); });

Excerpt from:

The total collapse of Jewish and Israeli PR - opinion - The Jerusalem Post

The making of the Jewish extremist Meir Kahane – TRT World

Posted By on May 20, 2021

Years after his death, the militant anti-Palestinian ideology of the Jewish Defence League leader lives on.

In late April, a video of an Israeli girl, a Jewish resident of Jerusalems Old City, went viral on social media. She was demonstrating with a band of young Jewish people who had been roaming the streets for days shouting Death to Arabs.

Around that time, Israeli forces had barricaded the Al-Aqsa mosque compound, stopping Muslim worshippers from praying at one of Islams holiest sites in the month of Ramadan when Muslims fast until daybreak.

Tensions rose as Israeli police used brute force to stop the Palestinians from reaching the mosque, firing rubber bullets and shooting stun grenades at them. All this happened amid international condemnation of an Israeli move to evict Palestinian families from their homes in the volatile Sheikh Jarrah neighbourhood.

That girl in the video was, in many ways, emblematic of the crisis unfolding in the occupied territory that Palestinians call their home. She was being interviewed by a Palestinian reporter who also happened to be the girls neighbour.

Im not saying well burn your village. I say leave the village and then we will come and live in it. Thats what we do in the Old City by the way, she told the reporter who works for Kan, the public broadcaster.

But more disturbing than the racist views she calmly articulated was a sticker she had on her shirt, which said Meir Kahane was right.

Its a slogan that is popular among a more extreme Jewish fringe of Israel that glorifies Rabbi Meir Kanane, a Jewish extremist who was among the first to popularise the idea of kicking all Arabs out of Israel; that there can not be any coexistence.

Not a single Israeli I know has made a greater contribution to the brutalization of the nation and its public spirit than did Kahane, wrote Ehud Sprinzak in aLA Times article. The late Professor Sprinzak of the Hebrew University was a leading authority on right-wing Jewish groups.

Kahane, an Israeli-American citizen, is long dead he was assassinated in 1990. His political career ended even before his death when the Supreme Court banned him from participating in Israeli politics in 1988.

Yet, his followers, Kahanists, continue to push forward his ideology.

Kahane is relevant in the sense that his distorted ideology is alive and kicking in Israel. And only recently a clear disciple of his was elected into the Knesset, Yossi Mekelberg, a senior fellow at the Chatham House, tells TRT World.

Itamar Ben Gvir, the leader of the far-right Otzma Yehudit (Jewish Power) party, entered the Israeli parliament last March after years of electoral defeats. It was none other than Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu who engineered Ben Gvirs rise as he secured his own political survival.

The Israeli police chief, Kobi Shabtai, minced no words in blaming Ben Gvir, a known Kahanist, for escalating recent tensions in Jerusalem.

"The person who is responsible for this Intifada is Itamar Ben Gvir, Shabtai told a recent press conference.

Taking tactics from the Kahane playbook, Ben Gvir recently opened up an office in Sheikh Jarrah, the Palestinian neighbhood in occupied East Jeursalem at the centre of the recent agitation.

Kahane might have long gone. But the fact is that there are people that adhere to his ideology, that they have a say in the Israeli politics and they are very determined to push their agenda to make him seem relevant, says Mekelberg.

Kahanes xenophobia and his logic of Jewish supremacy have manifested itself in incredibly bloody ways over the years.

Yigal Amir, a diehard Kahanist, who was against any reconciliation with the Palestinians, shot dead Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, two years after he signed the Oslo Accords with Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat.

In 1994, Baruch Goldstein, an Israeli military officer, gunned down 29 Muslim workshippers in whats known as the Hebron Massacre. Goldstein, a religious extremist, was also a Kahane disciple.

The 2015 Duma arson attack in which a Palestinian home was firebombed resulting in the death of a couple and their baby was carried out by Jewish extremists who were aligned with Kahanas grandson, Meir Ettinger.

Ettinger has remained on Israeli polices list of right-wing extremists as he openly calls for expelling Arabs and advocates violence.

The Duma incident brought extremist elements among the so-called hilltop youth the Israeli kids from illegal settlements under international spotlight.

For a man who has left behind such a violent legacy in Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories, his story starts thousands of miles up in an ethnically mixed working class neighbourhood of New York.

What a schmuck

Martin (he changed his name to Meir later) David Kahane was born in 1932 to parents who were Jewish migrants to the US. His father, Charles, was an Orthodox Rabbi who for years led religious congregations at a local synagogue.

As a child Kahane had a serious stuttering problem, which stayed with him for the rest of his life becoming more pronounced whenever he was forced into a tight corner, wrote Robert Friedman in the Kahane biography The False Prophet.

From the very beginning Kahane was exposed to Jewish militancy with his father telling Meir and his brother, Nachman, stories of Jewish heroism over Sabbath meals.

The 1930s and 40s was a time when Zionist militant groups such as the Irgun and the Stern Gang carried out bombings and assisnations against Palestinians and British officals.

Militant leaders including Irguns Menachem Begin, who would later become Israels Prime Minister, visited the Kanahe home in Flatbush, Brooklyn.

Kahanes father, Charles, a fervent Zionist, remained active in raising funds and organising logistics for smuggling weapons to Irgun in the British-controlled Palestinian areas, which are now part of Israel.

Charles was also an active member of the Revisionist Movement, founded by Zeev Vladimir Jabotinsky, who believed that Zionist state was to be created by means of force. The Revisionists bombed Palestinian markets and put bombs in their buses.

When Jabotinsky came to stay at Charless home, a young Meir was transfixed.

He followed him from room to room. One day Meir was literally sitting at his feet and Jabotinsky said, Meir, follow my footsteps. Im telling you, he hypnotized that child! Friedman quoted Sonia, Meirs mother, in his book.

As a young man, Meir joined Betar, the paramilitary youth wing of the Revisionist Movement. But unlike his vitriolic outbursts later in life, Meir never went to Palestine to actually participate in any of the fighting.

His most notable act of heroism was when in 1947, along with a few Betar comrades, he threw vegetables at the visiting anti-Zionist British Foreign Minister Ernest Bevin.

Kahane was arrested and charged but a sympathetic Jewish judge let him off with a suspended sentence, marking the start of a long brush with the law where Jewish judges in the US and Israel would let him go with a slap on the hand, despite his criminal record.

Never a good student, Kahane was known in high school for mischief and sarcasm, which often ended with, What a schmuck.

He would even make fun of ordinary middle class Jews who would come to his fathers congregations, saying that they were ignorant of Judaism. What schmucks, he would say.

But Kahane was no scholar himself. As a ninth grader at the Brooklyn Talmudical Academy, Meir fell behind other students and had difficulty keeping up with the rigorous Talmud courses.

Nevertheless, he continued to harbour notions about his own greatness, often writing essays and plays in which he somehow led the Jews of Israel.

The girl on the bridge

Meir Kahane graduated with a law degree in 1957 but he failed the bar exam. That same year he received his rabbinical ordination from the Orthodox Yeshiva Mirrer in Brooklyn.

By the time he joined the Howard Beach synagogue in a working-class neighbourhood of Queens, Kahane was married and had a one-year old child.

As a Rabbi, Kahane gained popularity as he took on his job with a zeal not seen before by the local Jews. He attacked American Jews for stepping away from orthodoxy. While adults might have cringed at some of his views, younger audiences were enthralled.

Kahane had a knack for connecting with kids, something which helped him find young recruits for his militant Jewish Defence League (JDL) later.

But as Kahanes young congregants started to wear yarmulkes and went around switching off lights and electrical appliances on Shabbos, parents started to worry.

The final straw came in 1960 when Kahane erected a floor-to-ceiling screen in his synagogue seperating male congregants from women. A majority of the congregants decided it was time for the radical Rabbi to go.

After being sidelined, a dejected Meir travelled to Israel, telling his family that he was going there to be part of the government cabinet. Instead he ended up in a Jewish school where teachers scolded him for his stuttering Hebrew and poor Talmudic skills.

He thought Ben-Gurion was going to meet him at the docks, his uncle, Rabbi Isaac Trainin, told Friedman.

Upon his return to the US after a few months, Kahane was desperate for a job to support his growing family, which now grew to four kids. He began delivering newspapers and wrote a weekly column for The Jewish Press, something that would become a springboard for his activism.

It was around this time in 1963 that Meir removed his yarmulke and tallis and began working with a childhood friend, Joseph Churba, who worked with the Central Intelligence Agency and Israeli intelligence.

Meir took up the pseudonym of Michael King and with Churba set up a think-tank that apparently did political research on government contracts.

He was a very complicated man. His relations in the US and his identities werent clear. For years it was rumored that he worked for the CIA, or the FBI, Shlomo Fischer, a senior fellow at the Jewish People Policy Institute, tells TRT World.

As Michael King, Kahane penetrated into various universities in a bid to influence Jewish students who were joining the anti-Vietnam war protests in large numbers.

He kept a separate apartment on East 85th Street in Manhattan while his wife and kids lived in Queens. In those years, Meir took up various identities but always introduced himself as King.

I knew him only as Michael King. He told me he had been a correspondent for a wire service in Africa and I recall at one point he volunteered that he was a Presbyterian, a New York public relations professional, who met Meir at a party, told Michael T Kaufman, a New York Times reporter. Kaufman was probably the first to write a detailed article on Meir in 1971.

For a man who often spoke about women contemptuously and promoted segregation, Kahane enjoyed extramarital affairs, which did not end as may have hoped.

In 1966, Meir started an affair with a 22-year-old aspiring model Gloria Jean DArgenio, bringing her to his apartment where they spent most of their time.

DArgenio, who also used the name Estelle Donna Evans, was madly in love with Meir and was looking for an eventual marriage. But after a few months, Meir broke off all contact with DArgenio, telling her via a letter that his real name was not Michael King and that he was married and had kids.

With the letter in her hand, DArgenio jumped off the Queensboro Bridge, plunging 135 feet below into the East River. Pictures of her agonised face while being rescued made it to the front page of New York Daily News. She died a day later.

Kaufman, the Times reporter, who also mentioned the D'Argenio incident in his detailed story, years later wrote a follow-up and regretted for not highlighting the affair prominently as it would have helped expose Kahane.

That episode shook Meir as he desperately tried to keep it away from the public limelight. But it did not stop him from putting his militant plans into action.

Every Jew .22

By 1968, Meir had discarded his second identity of Michael King and founded the Jewish Defence League (JDL), a radical group that on paper wanted to protect the interests of Jews living in the US but in reality was a vehicle for pushing his career forward and to raise money.

His first targets were not Palestinians or Arabs. Using his columns in the Jewish Press in the lead up to JDLs formation, Meir wrote venomously against the Black and Puerto Rican community, stoking fear about how they threatened Jewish neighbourhoods.

He quickly found a cause. In the late 1960s, New York City was updating its school system by trying to give more control of the schools to local communities including Black people.

But the teachers union was 90 percent white and almost two thirds of them were Jewish. When authorities tried to reassign a few white teachers to other places, Meir and JDL activists began a series of protests and demonstrations - they started disrupting school board meetings and threatened Black leaders.

JDL soon attained a reputation similar to that of the Black Panthers. As relations with the Black community worsened, Meir took out a full page ad in The New York Times with a picture of young JDL activists brandishing lead pipes and baseball bats under a headline Is this any way for a nice Jewish boy to behave?

With slogans such as Never Again and Every Jew a .22, Meir soon drew young Jewish men into JDLs fold from poor neighbourhoods in New York and elsewhere.

After his confrontations with the Black community, Meir became the strongest advocate of more than 2 million Jews living in the Soviet Union where they were facing increasing persecution by the communist regime.

JDL activists began a series a terrorist attacks against Soveit officials and institutions including multiple bombings such as the one at the Soviet cultural building on January 8, 1971. Even though no Soviet officials were killed, it raised alarm bells in Washington.

Meirs activities became so violent that President Richard Nixon feared they would wreck the Strategic Arms Limitation Act, which was designed to avoid a nuclear war with the Soviet Union.

All this added to Meirs popularity, and the JDL ranks continued to swell. By the early 1970s, the group claimed to have more than 10,000 activists across the US and Europe.

Then in late 1971, JDL militants fired a high-powered rifle into the Soviet Mission office in New York that almost killed a diplomats child. That prompted US law enforcement to launch a crackdown against JDL activists. Kahane was briefly arrested but did not face prison despite overwhelming evidence against him.

In late 1971, Kahene moved to Israel.

The goy must go

Over the next two decades until his assasination Kahane continued to organise terrorist attacks against Russians, Arabs and even Americans.

In Israel, he opened up an office, which he called Museum of the Potential Holocaust, which reflected his belief that diaspora Jews should move back to Israel if they wanted to avoid another Nazi tragedy.

He also ran a centre in the conservative settlement of Kirayat Araba that he used to indoctrinate young American Jews. One of them was Chicago-born Matt Liebowitz who attacked a bus and injured nine Palestinians. While he was being sentenced for 26-months, he told judges he regretted what he had done.

Liebowitz, who spent time with street gangs in the US after his parents divorced, was the kind of young man Meir targeted - a disturbed, disillusioned individual who could absorb his fanatical militant ideas.

Kahane was not the first in Israel who promoted the idea of building illegal Jewish settlements on the occupied Palestinian lands. The right-wing Gush Emunim was already doing that. But even Gush Emunim would hesitate when it came to attacking individual Palestinians, and it was open to the idea of co-existence.

But Kahane would have none of it. He wanted to kick out all the Palestinian citizens of Israel - and even those who lived in the occupied territories.

You cant buy an Arabs national aspiration, he would say in response to liberal Israelis who advocated peace.

The Arab is a cancer in our midst. And you dont coexist with cancer, he told an audience a few years before his death. A cancer you either cut out and throw out or you die. Is better to have Jewish state that is hated by the whole world than an Auschwitz loved by it.

Kahane became the first politician in Israel to run on a platform that openly called for the expulsion of Palestinians. His militant followers were often involved in attacking Palestinians.

He established a political party Kach (Thus!) and made multiple attempts to enter the Knesset, the Israeli parliament. He failed miserably. It was not until 1984 that his party won a seat. His followers celebrated by going through the Arab markets, overturning food stalls and shouting Death to Arabs.

When Kahane stood to speak at the parliament after his election, most of the MPs walked out.

Thats not to say Israel didnt protect him. Kahane continued to run underground terrorist operations, which included attempted hijack of a passenger plane, a plan to blow up the Dome of the Rock mosque, and multiple bombings. Even though the FBI made requests, Israeli authorities never cooperated in investigating the various charges against Kahane.

Even with the FBI on his trail, Kahane did not abandon his terrorist activities against those who defended the rights of the Palestinians. In October, 1985, a pipe-bomb rigged to a door killed Alex Odeh, a regional director at the Arab-American Anti Discrimination Committee (ADC).

Odeh was a Palestinian Christian who vigorously defended the image of Arabs in the Middle East. FBI identified two JDL activists in his murder. Both of them still live as free citizens in Israel.

But JDL and Kach were eventually listed as terrorist organisations in the US. Within Israel, Kahane was banned from politics and his support dwindled.

I remember when he came to my hometown of Givataim, which is adjacent to Tel Aviv, in 1985 to demonstrate, thousands and thousands of us came out in a rally to oppose him, says Yossi Mekelberg of the Chatham House.

Kahane was assassinated on November 5, 1990 in a New York hotel during a Zionist conference by El Sayyid A Nosair.

While he left behind a violent and divisive legacy and many people refer to him as the father of Jewish militancy, he was never able to achieve the popular support to accomplish his dream of creating a true theological Jewish state. But what is unmistakable is that recent chants of death to Arabs in Sheikh Jarrah will surely resonate with those who remember the JDLs violence.

Nobody mentions Meir Kahane as a person now. I personally do remember him as a person, says Fischer of the Jewish People Policy Institute.

Source: TRT World

Read more:

The making of the Jewish extremist Meir Kahane - TRT World

Ultra-Orthodox Jewish women are bucking the patriarchal, authoritarian stereotype of their community – The Conversation US

Posted By on May 20, 2021

Ultra-Orthodox Jews have been in the news a lot lately, partly due to their reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic.

With a few exceptions, the stories present ultra-Orthodox Jews as a patriarchal community that is authoritarian and resistant to public health measures, even during a global pandemic.

While this narrative has dominated coverage of this community for decades, it comes from a focus on ultra-Orthodox men. Male community leaders are quoted in the media, and men are more visible among the crowds that are resisting and protesting lockdown measures. This reinforces both outside views of women in the community as subservient and internal attempts to silence and exclude women.

But given the gender segregation in ultra-Orthodox communities, a complete picture of this society simply cannot be gleaned from men alone.

And when you look at ultra-Orthodox women, a picture of major societal change emerges. Women in the community are increasingly making reproductive decisions, working outside the home and resisting rabbis authority.

As a religious studies scholar who focuses on gender and Jews, I spent two years from 2009 to 2011 interviewing ultra-Orthodox women in Jerusalem about their reproductive experiences. What I heard then I see reflected in the dynamics in ultra-Orthodox communities in Israel today.

We talked about their pregnancies ultra-Orthodox women have about seven children on average as well as their choice of contraception and prenatal tests.

What came out most prominently from our conversations and the many hours of observations I conducted in clinics and hospitals was that after several pregnancies, ultra-Orthodox women begin to take control over their reproductive decisions. This runs counter to what the rabbis expect of them.

Rabbis expect ultra-Orthodox men and women to come to them for guidance on and permission for medical care. Knowing this, both male and female doctors might ask a woman who requests hormonal birth control, Has your rabbi approved of this? This relationship cultivates mistrust among ultra-Orthodox women and leads them to distance themselves from both doctors and rabbis when it comes to reproductive care.

However, this rejection of external authority over pregnancy and birth is supported by the ultra-Orthodox belief that pregnancy is a time when women embody divine authority. Womens reproductive authority, then, is not completely countercultural; its embedded in ultra-Orthodox theology.

While gender segregation has long been a feature of ultra-Orthodox ritual life, men and women now lead very different lives.

In Israel, ultra-Orthodox men spend most of their days in a Kollel, or religious institute, studying sacred Jewish texts. This task earns them a modest stipend from the government.

While the community still valorizes poverty, ultra-Orthodox women have become the primary breadwinners. Over the past decade, they have increasingly attended college and graduate school in order to support their large families. In fact, they now enter the work force at a similar rate as their secular peers and are forging new careers in technology, music and politics, for example.

Some recent TV shows depict this kind of nuanced understanding of gender and authority among ultra-Orthodox Jews. Take the last season of the Netflix series Shtisel, for instance.

In the TV show, Shira Levi, a young ultra-Orthodox woman from a Mizrahi background which refers to Jews from the Middle East and North Africa does scientific research. She enters into a relationship with one of the main Ashkenazi, or European Jewish, characters. Their ethnic differences end up being a bigger source of tension than Shiras academic interests.

Another character, Tovi Shtisel, is a mother who works outside the home as a teacher. Despite objections from her husband, a Kollel student, she buys a car so she can get to work more efficiently.

And finally, Ruchami, who first appears as a teenager in season one, eagerly marries a Talmud scholar but struggles with a serious medical condition that makes pregnancy life-threatening. Despite her commitment to ultra-Orthodox life, she flouts rabbinic and medical rulings. After her rabbis ruling that she should not have another child due to her medical risks, Ruchami decides to get pregnant without anybodys knowledge.

These characters reflect my research that ultra-Orthodox women have a much different relationship to rabbinic authorities and pronouncements than men. This is not just due to changing attitudes among women, however. Ultra-Orthodox society has been experiencing what some call a crisis of authority for years.

Today there is a proliferation of new formal and informal leaders, leading to a diffusion of authority. In addition to the many rabbis in ultra-Orthodox communities, their assistants or informal helpers, called askanim, operate pervasively. Ultra-Orthodox women also turn to theories that are repackaged in ultra-Orthodox language, like anti-vaccination campaigns. And finally, ultra-Orthodox Jews have created online groups that challenge the authority of leading rabbis.

The dominance of one narrative about ultra-Orthodox Jews reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic ignores other reasons why the virus spread so rapidly and devastatingly in these communities.

Interviews with women would have revealed that poverty and cramped living spaces made social distancing almost impossible. These conversations would have also revealed that although some consider Rabbi Chaim Kaneivsky, a 93-year-old ultra-Orthodox rabbi who has cultivated a significant following, to be the king of COVID for rejecting public health measures, there is no single rabbi whom all Israeli ultra-Orthodox Jews follow. In fact, many ultra-Orthodox Jews in Israel have been following COVID-19 guidelines.

And furthermore, attention to womens complicated experiences with the medical establishment would have highlighted the mistrust and doubt that permeates the ultra-Orthodox communitys relationship to public health measures.

During a public health crisis, it is easy to demonize those who might not follow medical guidelines. But ultra-Orthodox Jews are diverse, and I believe understanding their complexity would enable better medical information and care to reach these populations.

[3 media outlets, 1 religion newsletter. Get stories from The Conversation, AP and RNS.]

More here:

Ultra-Orthodox Jewish women are bucking the patriarchal, authoritarian stereotype of their community - The Conversation US


Page 803«..1020..802803804805..810820..»

matomo tracker