Page 840«..1020..839840841842..850860..»

MPs tell Bristol it is giving ‘green light to anti-Jewish incitement’ – The Tab

Posted By on February 19, 2021

Professor David Miller has in our opinion been inciting hatred against Jewish students on your campus.

A group of MPs has slammed the University of Bristol today, saying in a letter to Vice Chancellor Hugh Brady: For every day that thisgoes unaddressed, you will be giving a green light to anti-Jewish incitement.

The All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism wrote to Brady: Professor Miller brings public shame to your institution and his comments are dangerous, adding that they wrote to the university two years ago about Miller, but said: The lack of action since has been palpable.

The group is composed of MPs from all parties, including Labour, the Conservatives, the Liberal Democrats, the SNP, and Plaid Cymru.

Miller has also been heavily criticised by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, Bristol SU, the Union of Jewish Students, the Community Security Trust, Labour Against Antisemitism, Bristol staff, students, alumni, leading figures in the UK, among others.

Bristol University said in a statement today that it cannot unilaterally fire staff members due to employment law, but told The Bristol Tab: We do not endorse the comments made by Professor Miller about our Jewish students. We are proud of our students for their independence and individual contributions to the University and wider society.

MPs said in the letter that in their opinion, Miller has been inciting hatred against Jewish students on your campus, noting that he directly targeted students in his recent remarks.

On Thursday, Miller replied to a request for comment from The Bristol Tab, which the APPG described as including accusations of dual loyalty, conspiracy, subterfuge, dishonesty, racism and a global network with Israel pulling the strings, focussed on Bristol universitys Jewish student society.

They have requested an urgent meeting with VC Hugh Brady, adding that they want to make clear the cross-party consensus on the requirement for you to take appropriate action to address this disturbing behaviour.

Thangam Debonnaire, MP for Bristol West, also condemned Miller, telling The Bristol Tab:There is absolutely no place for antisemitism in our universities, our city or anywhere and it must be dealt with.

Ive spoken to members of the Jewish Society and others and Ill be meeting with University authorities as soon as possible to discuss the situation.

On Saturday, Miller launched an attack calling for the the end of Zionism as well as claiming Its fundamental to Zionism to encourage Islamophobia and anti-Arab racism too. He went on to criticise Jewish student groups, with Bristol JSoc targeted by Miller, leading to the president of Bristol JSoc being targeted for abuse online.

Millers recent comments come after two years of complaints made against the professor. He was widely condemned in 2019 when images emerged of presentation slides from his lectures claiming Zionist movements (parts of) as being one of the five pillars of Islamophobia.

He said in a statement to The Bristol Tab on Thursday that Zionism is a racist, violent, imperialist ideology premised on ethnic cleansing, endemically anti-Arab and Islamophobic ideology, and said It has no place in any society.

He claimed that the Union of Jewish Students (UJS) is obliged to silence critics of Zionism or the State of Israel on British campuses. He also said that the Bristol JSoc, alongside all Jewish Societies and the UJS, are engaged in a campaign of censorship which renders Arab and Muslim students, as well as anti-Zionist Jewish students, particularly unsafe.

Bristol JSoc and the UJS are organising an online rally on Wednesday to pressure the university into dealing with antisemitism on campus.

Featured image: Harrys Place / YouTube

Leading Jewish organisation slams Bristol Uni for continued employment of David Miller

Anti-Semitism is unacceptable: Bristol SU back JSoc after comments made by lecturer

Bristol Uni Law lecturer under fire from Islamic Society over Islamophobic remarks

Read the original:
MPs tell Bristol it is giving 'green light to anti-Jewish incitement' - The Tab

Pressure mounts on Bristol Uni over academic accused of ‘antisemitic tropes’ – Jewish News

Posted By on February 19, 2021

Pressure is mounting on Bristol University to take action against a professor accused of using countless antisemitic tropes in a response to complaints made by the Jewish society.

Sociology lecturer David Miller has doubled down on remarks made earlier this week, when he called to end Zionism as a functioning ideology, branding it the enemy.

His comments are the latest in a string of incidents which have led to formal complaints by Jewish community groups and students lodged with the university.

Get The Jewish News Daily Edition by email and never miss our top storiesFree Sign Up

Acampaign was also launched to have him removed from his post, which has had more than 1,000 signatures.

Asked by student publication The Tab about his remarks, professor Miller again went on the offensive, branding Zionism a racist, violent, imperialist ideology premised on ethnic cleansing which has no place in any society.

He accused Bristol Jewish society (Jsoc) of operating under the auspices of the Union of Jewish Students (UJS), an Israel lobby group which is constitutionally bound to promoting Israel.

Miller claimed Jewish students run a campaign of censorship and that Bristol Jsoc have consistently attacked me with a campaign of manufactured hysteria for two years, attempting to have me sacked.

READ MORE:

The campaign reached new heights of absurdity when a Zionist activist pretended to be a student in one of my classes for which she was not registered, expressly for the purpose of political surveillance. This is an age-old Israel lobby tactic imported from the US, where academics are routinely harassed for teaching about Zionism and its effects.

He claimed the campaign is directed by the State of Israel and that the Jewish state and its advocates deserve the same treatment.

His comments led to accusations of antisemitism by author and campaigner Dave Rich, who tweeted: Count the antisemitic tropes: dual loyalty, conspiracy, subterfuge, dishonesty, racism, a global network with Israel pulling the strings. Prof Miller isnt speaking about some mythical Elder of Zion but about and to actual Jewish students at his own Bristol University.

Mark Gardner, Chief Executive of the Community Security Trust said: Bristol Universitys disgrace gets worse by the day, in not taking action against Miller. They are failing in their most basic duty of care to all students, whether Jewish or not.

Thangam Debbonaire, MP for Bristol West told Jewish News:There is absolutely no place for antisemitism in our universities, our city or anywhere and it must be dealt with. Ive spoken to members of the Jewish Society and others and Ill be meeting with University authorities as soon as possible to discuss the situation.

A spokesperson for the Union of Jewish students branded his comments ridiculous and baseless.

On Tuesday Bristol University Student Union released a statement saying it is deeply concerned and will always support students who call for action against discrimination on our campus. Antisemitism is unacceptable.

It said: We are committed to upholding the IHRA definition of Antisemitism and will continue to combat discrimination on campus.

A spokesperson for the University of Bristol said: We have received a significant number of calls for Professor David Miller to be dismissed.

UK law requires that we, like all employers, act in accordance with our internal procedures and the ACAS code of conduct. Any action which we might take as an employer is a private matter. We are under obligations of confidentiality in relation to all of our students and staff, which we will continue to comply with.

We are speaking to JSoc, Bristol SU and UCU about how we can address students concerns swiftly, ensuring that we also protect the rights of our staff.

We do not endorse the comments made by Professor Miller about our Jewish students. We are proud of our students for their independence and individual contributions to the University and wider society.

Read the original:
Pressure mounts on Bristol Uni over academic accused of 'antisemitic tropes' - Jewish News

The Charedi Rabbi Who Changed His Mind On Zionism: An Interview With Rabbi Moshe Lichtman – The Jewish Press – JewishPress.com

Posted By on February 19, 2021

Last month marked the 76th yahrzeit of Rabbi Yissachar Shlomo Teichtal, author of Eim HaBanim Semeicha, who was murdered while being transported from Auschwitz to Mauthhausen.

To learn more about his life and the famous sefer he penned, The Jewish Press recently spoke with Rabbi Moshe Lichtman, who translated the work into English in 2002. Rabbi Lichtman is also the translator of An Angel Among Men and the author of Eretz Yisrael in the Parashah. Originally from New Jersey, he currently lives in Beit Shemesh, Israel.

The Jewish Press: For those who arent familiar with Rabbi Teichtal, what can you say about him?

Rabbi Lichtman: Rav Teichtal was a renowned gadol in Europe by the age of 24. In my opinion, if he were alive today, there would be no one close to him in Torah scholarship.

He was also a master darshan. I have given many shiurim based on his writings, and listeners are always spellbound. In his generation, he was on par with the Chofetz Chaim. He knew the entire Torah by heart.

Growing up in Hungary, the center of Satmar, he was influenced by the anti-Zionist opinions of the great rabbis around him, naturally adopting their negative outlook regarding the Zionist movement. But yntil the Holocaust, the issue did not concern him at all. He filled his time with learning and halachic writings.

What changed and led him to write Eim HaBanim Semeichah, which argues passionately for making aliyah, which he says will bring Moshiach?

In the Introduction to Eim HaBanim Semeichah, he writes: Now that we have encountered unwanted daysI am unable to delve into ordinary halachic matterssince such study requires clarity of mind. Moreover, the storms of exile which have assaulted us, have banished the students from my yeshiva. I remained alone, isolated with my thoughts over the present-day destruction of the people and communities of Israel. Why has the Lord done this? What is the meaning of this terrible anger?

How do you explain his dramatic turn-around from being a staunch anti-Zionist to an outspoken advocate for mass Aliyah?

I think that all of his life he simply accepted what he had been taught by his teachers. After he went into hiding in Bucharest as a wanted fugitive [from Czechoslovakia], he had time to ponder the question [of Zionism]. In the Introduction to Eim HaBanim Semeichah, he writes: Why has the Lord done this? What is the meaning of this terrible anger?

Having crossed the border illegally, he couldnt walk freely on the streets of the city. But without any books whatsoever, he reviewed the entire Torah with his extraordinary photographic memory and reached the conclusion:

The sole purpose of all the afflictions which smite us in our exile is to arouse us to return to our Holy Land. I intend to publicly express my opinion, to teach and advise our people, the Children of Israel, how to hasten the future Redemption, speedily in our days.

He mentions 15 times in the course of the book that he didnt have any sefarim with him and then goes on the quote the source exactly, or almost exactly not only it comes from the Torah, Tanach, Gemara, Rishonim, or Achronim, but from all the commentaries on them as well.

He writes: The purpose of this work is to raise our Land from the dust and stimulate love and affection for it in the hearts of our Jewish brethren. The essential point is that Hashem is waiting for us to take the initiative, to desire and long for the return to Eretz Yisrael. He does not want us to wait for Him to bring us there.

[W]hen we, on our own volition, truly and with all of our strength, desire and strive to return to the Land, then G-d will complete the work for us beneficially.

How was the book received?

We really dont know. From his own writings, we know that Rav Teichtal would venture out to secret meetings of Jews to give sermons about his great revelation, and to urge them to find ways to escape the coming doom.

With a heavy heart, he bemoans the fact that when he requested to speak at these underground meetings and prayer gatherings, he was told not to talk about Eretz Yisrael.

From what he writes in the books introduction, we can assume that few people heeded his impassioned warning and call: Those who have a predisposition on this matter will not see the truth and will not concede to our words. All the evidence in the world will not affect them, for they are smitten with blindness and their inner biases cause them to deny even things which are as clear as day.

Who amongst us is greater than the Spies? The Torah testifies that they were proper individuals. Nonetheless, since they were influenced by their desire for authority, and thus, they rejected the desirable Land and led others astray, causing this bitter exile, as Chazal explain. The same holds true in our times, even among rabbis, Rebbes, and chassidim.

In another place in Eim Habanim Semeicha, he writes, I know that the humble ones who separate themselves from the building effort do so for the sake of heaven. They fear that they and their children may be harmed by joining people whose ways have strayed from the path of the Torah.

Behold, we can say about such people that although their intentions are acceptable, their actions are not, for many reasons. All Jews must be united in order to fulfill the positive commandment of the Torah of building and settling the Land. Therefore, do as you are commanded!

Further, no harm will come to a Jew who participates in this great and exceedingly lofty mitzvah. On the contrary, if a large number of Orthodox Jews join in, they will enhance the sanctity of the Land, as I previously cited in the name of the holy Rebbe of Gur and the Ramban. Since we are commanded to build the Land and raise it from the dust, it is forbidden to be overly pious and undermine this endeavor, G-d forbid.

I heard that not all of Rav Teichtals family was happy when the book was republished in Israel in 1983.

I understand from the publisher, Rabbi Danny Cohen, that there was a family dispute on ideological lines. One of the rabbis sons belonged to the Lubavitch community in New York, and he didnt want the book to be published in Israel.

After the Holocaust, the book was published in Hebrew in America in a limited edition, which, I have heard, was bought out almost in its entirety by some religious group opposed to Zionism, which proceeded to burn all of the copies but I cannot vouch for the accuracy of that report.

In any event, one of the sons living in Israel, Menachem, felt less antagonistic toward Medinat Yisrael and asked the Rebbe of Chabad what to do. The Rebbe replied that Rav Teichtal was a tzaddik, not a Zionist in the pejorative use of the term, and that the book was a legitimate Torah study about Eretz Yisrael.

So the son gave his permission on the condition that a letter from him would be included at the beginning of the book, explaining that his father was not a Zionist, but rather wrote the treatise out of his great love for the Holy Land.

As in interesting side note, one of Rav Teichtals great-grandsons, a Chabad chassid, is the chief rabbi of Berlin, actively engaged in revitalizing the Jewish community of Germany. I cant help but wonder if he has ever studied his great-grandfathers book.

How did Rav Teichtal die?

When the Final Solution of the Nazis finally reached Hungary, Rav Teichtal tried to flee with his family back to Czechoslovakia, hoping the situation was better there. They were captured and sent to Auschwitz. Then, as the Russian armies drew close to the extermination camp, the Nazis transported the inmates deeper into Germany.

During the train ride to Mauthausen, guards threw crusty chunks of bread to their captives. When a Ukrainian prisoner grabbed a piece out of the hand of an old and starving Jew, Rav Teichtal protested. Others Jews warned him to mind his own business, but he demanded that the thief return the bread. A student, who was in the cattle car as well, says that Ukrainian prisoners and a Nazi guard beat Rabbi Teichtal to death.

Do you have any indication how readers of the English translation have reacted to it?

Baruch Hashem! The response has been fantastic. I have received many letters of thanks, including testimonials from people who made aliyah after having read the book. Rav Teichtals style is amazing in its combination of passion, Torah erudition, and unrelenting truth. His Torah greatness and honesty jump out from the pages.

I am certain that thousands of people have been inspired and awakened by the clearly-presented discussions and scholarly proofs in the book which emphasize the vital nature and centrality of Jewish Life in the Land of Israel.

In my opinion, with the world upheaval that corona has caused, and with ever-increasing anti-Semitism, the message of the book is just as real today. After reading Eim HaBanim Semeicha, you cannot return to being the same person unless your head is filled with denial and the need to guard yourself from the truth.

Originally posted here:
The Charedi Rabbi Who Changed His Mind On Zionism: An Interview With Rabbi Moshe Lichtman - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com

I’m tired of waiting for my uni to act against conspiratorial hatred – Jewish News

Posted By on February 19, 2021

Professor David Miller has terrified Jewish students for years. Its time for the university to take action.

The last 24 hours has been a whirlwind for Jewish students at the University of Bristol (UOB). In a video released last week David Miller, a sociology Professor at the University of Bristol, called for an end of Zionism. His comments have shaken all Jews and Jewish allies at Bristol.

Since this video was released Miller has doubled down on his comments. In a statement sent to reporters at The Tab Bristol, Miller declared Zionism a racist, violent, imperialist ideology premised on ethnic cleansing. He suggested that Bristol JSoc had manufactured hysteria and our campaign again his had rendered Arab and Muslim students unsafe. He further claims our lobby tactics are directed by the State of Israel.

As a Jewish UOB student I am appalled and saddened by this. I can personally reassure David Miller that my complaints have not been manufactured by campus-based lobby groups. As cool as it would be to be a secret Israeli operative, I can assure Miller that myself and the rest of the JSoc committee are ordinary students and we are not on the payroll of Mossad. I spend most nights writing essays, watching Ru Pauls Drag Race and doodling. Exciting I know!

Two years ago Bristol JSoc launched a complaint against Miller after a Jewish student came forward and described their experiences in his classroom (on the condition of anonymity).

I was one of the only Jewish students in David Millers class. Honestly it was scary because he is a teacher so people believed the anti-Semitism he was spreading. I was scared because I am one voice and felt I couldnt stand up to him or tell him what he was saying was wrong.

In Millers Harms of the Powerfulmodule he claimed the Zionist movement (parts of) were pillars of islamophobia. He also attempted to link various British Jewish organisations to the state of Israel. As a Jewish student, this conspiratorial spiders web of arrows and organisationswas grimly reminiscent of antsemitic tropes where Jews are accused of having unique power and influence over political affairs.

Since then Miller has faced no repercussions for his comments. Jewish students have felt ignored and neglected by the University of Bristol. I have watched with frustration as the University has failed us time and time again. .

I am tired of waiting for the University to act. Instead of working on my dissertation like any normal third year I have spent the best part of this week dealing with racists because the University of Bristol is too slow to act.

I have decided to take a definitive stand against Miller. Yesterday I started a petition calling for his dismissal. Right now the petition has 1100+ signatures but it needs your help. The Jewish community is beautiful and resourceful. If the university refuses to take action and protect its students, then it is up to us Jews to make a stand. Please lend us your support and sign this petition.

Sabrina is a Jewish student at the University of Bristol, and the Opinion Editor of the Bristol student paper. She's previously been featured in The Telegraph, The Whip and TechRound

Go here to read the rest:
I'm tired of waiting for my uni to act against conspiratorial hatred - Jewish News

LETTERS: Wise up, CA progressives; Hooray for Dr. Fauci; etc. – The Jewish News of Northern California

Posted By on February 19, 2021

Wise up, CA progressives

I agree with Oakland City Council member Dan Kalb that having two out of the five questions that the Progressive Delegates Network asked Democratic Party delegate candidates focus on Israel was overkill (California progressives get pushback on Zionism litmus test, Feb. 9).

Of the myriad issues that the party should be considering, attitudes toward Israel and Palestinians are far less important than indicated by the 40 percent represented in the questionnaire.

More critical, however, is the continued effort to conflate two separate issues, being pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian. It is time to move beyond thinking that to be pro-Palestinian one must, for example, also support the BDS movement and right of return. Palestinians must have a state of their own in the West Bank and Gaza, and Israel must accept its responsibility to end the conditions that Palestinians suffer each day.

However, BDS clearly has not been an effective advocacy tool, and right of return simply will never happen. There are better ways of building a just and lasting two-state peace in the Middle East. Creating a faulty litmus test for would-be Democratic delegates is counterproductive.

Personally, as a member of J Street, I advocate for meaningful measures to build support in the U.S. Congress for a pro-Palestinian as well as a pro-Israel foreign policy. I think that with the Democratic Party in Washington now in the leadership role, we can make real progress. We dont need the red-herring litmus test that the so-called Progressive Delegates Network was offering.

Jon KaufmanOakland

I grew up in the Bronx, in the Amalgamated Housing Cooperative, fairly close to the Stella Doro bakery (Why American Jews love Stella Doro cookies, Feb. 5 print edition).

When the wind was blowing in the right direction, you could smell the cookies baking. Stella Doro also had a restaurant in a building next to the bakery. Our family used to go there frequently for Sunday dinner. My mother often got lasagna, and I typically ordered the fried, breaded shrimp with spaghetti (for some unexplained reason, kosher did not come into play in restaurants).

This was gourmet heaven for an 8-year-old Bronx boy.

There were only two choices for dessert: spumoni or tortoni. But there was always a plate of cookies for the whole table. My mother would bring home the leftovers. As far as I know, you can still get Stella Doro Breakfast Treats and Swiss Fudge at Safeway.

Dr. Robert GolombBerkeley

The First Amendment is invariably cited to justify what is always termed legitimate criticism of Israel, no matter how untrue and/or hateful the verbiage may be.

However, even Bari Weiss and Ayaan Hirsi Ali, women of great intelligence and impeccable integrity, are incapable of presenting any legitimate criticism of Palestinians or Islam (Commonwealth Club event goes forward, despite CAIR criticism of anti-Muslim speakers, Feb. 12).

An impenetrable deflector shield of victimhood sanctity protects these entities.

Criticism of Palestinians or Islam is and apparently always will be anti-Muslim, racist and/or Islamophobic.

Julia LutchDavis

Kudos to Dr. Anthony Fauci for receiving a $1 million prize this week from Israels Dan David Foundation for his lifelong work in vaccine development (Fauci wins $1 million Israeli prize, Feb. 16).

In its statement, the foundation said he was receiving this award, among other reasons, for courageously defending science in the face of uninformed opposition during the challenging Covid crisis, a direct reference to his turbulent days under Trump as he tried to uphold the work of science, as opposed to the divisive politicking going on all around him.

In opposing anti-mask and anti-distancing in Trumps many unsafe gatherings over the last year, and therefore ostensibly sidelined, Fauci stood his ground against the anti-scientists as the U.S. continued to witness the highest death rates in the world.

Not only did he receive this prestigious award, but he is now once again fully recognized under the Biden government for the important work he continues to do on behalf of all of us.

Mazel tov, Dr. Fauci!

Yvonne BoxermanPalo Alto

I want to commend you on the addition of Gabe Stutman to your staff.

As someone who had been engaged as a journalist many years ago, I am most impressed by the quality of his reporting on controversial issues, his journalistic high standards and excellent writing style. He is a true professional in the best sense of the word.

Ruhama LipowWalnut Creek

For 70-plus years, Jews who believe in things like protecting the environment, health care for everybody, equality under the law, etc. have been able to call themselves progressives even when they turn their backs on Israels human rights violations against Palestinians (Progressive with some strings attached, Feb. 12).

But now, the times they are a-changin.

Now there are organizations like the Progressive Delegates Network that expect progressives to be consistent in their beliefs in order to win an endorsement.

Is it too much to ask of a candidate for public office that they support the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, freedom of speech in all matters and for everyone? And what about the rights of refugees to return to their homeland if they so choose? Is that also not a basic human right that all candidates should support, especially if they call themselves progressives?

There was not a single word about Israel or Palestine in the Progressive Delegates Networks questionnaire for (people seeking to become delegates for the California Democratic Party). There were only two general statements about protecting freedom of speech and the rights of refugees.

Organizations have the right to establish their own criteria for endorsement. If candidates dont agree with the criteria, they can seek endorsements elsewhere. That is their right.

Lois PearlmanGuerneville

The Torah teaches us that leaders are not perfect.

Noah saved the world but in his old age became a drunkard and debased himself. Jacob, also known as Israel, our namesake, deceived his father (that he was Esau) and tricked his uncle/employer Lavan out of his sheep (causing the lambs to be born speckled and spotted after making a deal to get the speckled and spotted ones).

Aaron was the first Kohen Gadol (high priest), but before that he fashioned the golden calf. Even Moses, in a fit of frustration during the 40 years in the desert, disobeyed Gods instruction and was forbidden to lead the Jews into Israel.

Yet, despite their flaws, all these forefathers remain eternally to be invoked and honored for their accomplishments.

The idea that the school board would strip school names honoring such accomplished leaders as Washington, Hamilton, Madison (my elementary school) and Lincoln shows a failure to understand the importance of true leadership (S.F. school board approves plan to rename 44 schools, including Feinstein and Sutro, Jan. 27).

It teaches a bad lesson to our kids and to the public and degrades the whole city.

Alan TitusSan Francisco

Politicians quoting the Old Testament has come back into fashion (Joe Bidens inauguration was replete with anxiety, and a lot of it was Jewish, Jan. 21).

The roots of American exceptionalism rhetoric began in Colonial times, when our Founding Fathers often spoke of our country as the American Zion and the 13 [sic] colonies as the tribes of Israel who were chosen by HaShem to be a light unto the world. That ended with the Civil War.

Some of the uptick in Old Testament quoting is a good sign, but some is dangerous in that it represents a mischaracterization of HaShem and Mosaic law as authoritarian and universal. The question is why now?

I think that American politicians across the spectrum turn to biblical authoritarianism to fill the void when there is little political consensus. Politicians argue that a cause or action is justified on moral grounds or a higher authority. It is a sign of a liberal democracy under stress. One road to fascism goes through biblical authoritarianism.

In other cases, citing a verse from the Old Testament can be viewed as a heartfelt expression of religious faith by our political leaders. I liked all the faith talk during the inauguration. I get a kick out of three former presidents wishing Joe Biden Godspeed on national TV.

I even gave our newly elected president the benefit of the doubt when he cited Ecclesiastes 3:1-8, a time to every purpose under Heaven, to signify that HaShem had a hand in his win.

Larry AbramsMonterey County

Read this article:
LETTERS: Wise up, CA progressives; Hooray for Dr. Fauci; etc. - The Jewish News of Northern California

Canada should say no to racism at the United Nations – iPolitics.ca

Posted By on February 19, 2021

By bringing together all nations democratic and non-democratic alike the United Nations provides opportunities for both: For states that respect human rights, the UN can provide a forum for promoting that respect, while for states that violate them, the UN becomes a forum in which to defend, divert, and obfuscate.

One diversion tactic the latter use is to point human-rights standards elsewhere. They might use the vocabulary of human rights, but these words mean what they want them to mean.

The 2001 World Conference against Racism is a prime example. By singling out Israel, the concluding document was itself racist. It called the Jews of Israel foreigners, even though Jews have lived continuously in Israel since prehistoric times.

The document further referred to their presence in the region as colonial occupation, even though colonization of the area had ended with the termination of the British mandate in 1948. The document blamed the plight of the Palestinians on Israel alone, as if all the terrorist organizations targeting the Jews of Israel, not least the Palestinian governing authority, had nothing to do with it.

While the strategies employed by rights-violating states at the UN to smother criticism are various, a notable component is an inordinate focus on Israel. Israel is small and geopolitically insignificant. A raft of states in the Arab and Muslim world are opposed to its very existence. Non-democratic states who are neither Arab nor Muslim, but who want to make sure the UN busies itself with anyone but them, are quick to join Arab/Muslim states in elaborate, prolonged, exaggerated criticism of Israel.

Zionism stands for the existence of Israel as the realization of the right to self-determination of the Jewish people. Anti-Zionism stands opposed. There is a confluence of agendas of the anti-Zionists states and the other non-democratic states. Anti-Zionists, having failed in their attempts to destroy Israel through force in 1948, 1967, and 1973 have switched to terrorism and delegitimization through demonization. A primary vehicle for this delegitimization strategy is the United Nations.

Jews are the prototypical victims of racism. They are a people whose victimization has been so awful, it gave racism itself, before the Holocaust a widely accepted ideology, a bad name. Yet, they themselves are labelled by anti-Zionists (in a typically tyrannical vocabulary inversion) as racist. Non-democratic states that repress their minorities and who truly are racist are more than happy to jump on this anti-Zionist bandwagon barrelling toward Israel and away from them.

We can be thankful that Canada and several other states walked out of the Durban Conference. But the anti-democratic/anti-Zionist coalition at the UN never misses a trick. It embraced a Durban Review Conference in Geneva in 2009, and a 10th-anniversary event in New York in 2011. Canada boycotted both, as did other rights-respecting states.

At the end of last year, the UN General Assembly decided by resolution that in September 2021 it will celebrate the 20th anniversary of the Durban Declaration. Canada voted against this resolution, as did several other rights-respecting states. The anniversary celebration this fall is expected to call for the full implementation of the declaration.

Feb. 22 is the first day of the next session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva. On opening day, a high-level panel is scheduled to discuss the upcoming 20th anniversary. Canada should there express again its concerns about the Durban document and make clear its intention not to attend the celebration.

Canada, despite all the obfuscation of the cabal of anti-Zionist and other non-democratic states, should work through the United Nations to combat real racism. One component must be standing continuously against the Durban perversion of the anti-racist agenda to serve racist ends, with Jews yet again the intended victims.

The fight against racism is too important to ignore. Through their resurrection of the Durban Document and their pretend accusation as racist of a people devastated by racism, truly racist states attempt to avoid the criticism they so justly deserve. Canada at the United Nations should continue to say no to racism, real racism, and no also to this 20th anniversary.

Sarah Teich is a senior fellow with the Macdonald Laurier Institute. David Matas is senior honorary counsel to Bnai Brith Canada. He was rapporteur for the Jewish Caucus at the 2001 Durban World Conference Against Racism.

The views, opinions and positions expressed by all iPolitics columnists and contributors are the authors alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of iPolitics.

More from iPolitics

View post:
Canada should say no to racism at the United Nations - iPolitics.ca

IfNotNow smears IHRA definition as a ‘threat’ to progressivism – JNS.org

Posted By on February 19, 2021

(February 19, 2021 / JNS) The self-proclaimed Jewish-American progressive organization IfNotNowhosted a discussion on Jan. 27 about how theIHRA definition of anti-Semitism has been destroying the progressive movement. The word discussion, may, in fact, be too generous a term for what was, in reality, a diatribe of misinformation.

An address by Taher Herzallah, associatedirector of outreach and grassroots organizing for American Muslims for Palestine (AMP), took up much of the event.It should be noted right away that AMPs platforms disseminate anti-Jewish propaganda. Articles on its websitecomplainabout Jews illegally colonizing the occupied territoriesandZionist Jews who have the gall to regard Jerusalem as the undivided capital of the Jewish state. Appallingly, avideoposted to AMPs Facebook page commemorating Nakba Day falselypresentsa picture of Holocaust victims as Palestinian victims of Israeli violence (the picture in question is displayed at 1:25 in thevideo). IfNotNow haspartneredwith AMP in the past.

Herzallah has hardly shied away from hatred himself. At a 2014 AMP conference, he reportedlyclaimed: Israelis have to be bombed; they are a threat to the legitimacy of Palestine, and it is wrong to maintain the State of Israel. Thatsame year, AMP hosted a fundraiser dinner in honor ofRasmea Odeh, a convicted terrorist directly responsible for the deaths of two civilians in a 1969 grocery-store bombing in Jerusalem. IfNotNow maypurportto stand up for the freedom and dignity for all Israelis and Palestinians, but its embrace of AMP suggests otherwise.

The rhetoric spouted by Herzallah during this event is of equal concern. He egregiously asserted that people like [him] had to pay the price for the Holocaustan obvious attempt to appropriate the trauma of the victims of Nazi genocide on International Holocaust Remembrance Day, no less. He even dismissed the well-documentedalliancebetween certain Palestinian leaders and the Nazi regime as part of a myth before later insisting that we want to question the existence of the State of Israel itself. This questioning, he urged, should not be off the table.

Subscribe to The JNS Daily Syndicateby email and never missour top stories

His historical revisionism aside, Herzallah should realize that his argument is a two-way street. If advocating for the dissolution of Israel is on the table in the spirit of free speech, then so is pointing out the anti-Jewishdouble standardbehind it.

But that, of course, is the entire point: The IHRA working definitionno matter how much its opponents argue otherwisedoes not impinge on the rights of free speech. The IHRA website evendescribesthe definition as non-legally binding and specifies that criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as anti-Semitic.

Astoundingly, this didnt stop the events speakers from falsely asserting on multiple occasions that the IHRA definition and its advocates aim to criminalize the BDS movement that targets Israel. Indeed, this strawman argument was a recurring theme; one speakers presentation even featured a slide that insisted that the definition has been used to, among other things, squash free speech. The slide provided no examples to back up the claims, although a speaker did at one point decry the Trump administrations 2019executive orderaffording Jews protections under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act as an attack on freedoms.

Such fears are unfounded. Theorderclarifies that those enforcing Title VI should consider the IHRA definition when identifying evidence ofdiscriminationbased on race, color or national origin (emphasis added) and not diminish or infringe upon any right protected under Federal law or under the First Amendment. As the Anti-Defamation League hasexplained, Under the order, criticism of Israel may be considered protected speech, but the line must be drawn when such expression becomes intentional, unlawful, discriminatory intimidation and harassment.

Speakers, including an activist with the U.K.-based IfNotNow-equivalent Naamod, expressed similar concerns regarding British domestic politics. The approach was equally distorted. At multiple institutions, including the University of Cambridge, the adoption of the IHRA definition has been accompanied by explicit affirmations of the commitment to freedom of speech and inquiry. EvenPage 16 of the Legal Guide for Palestine Solidarity Student Activists itself acknowledges that there is no known case of any university directly citing the IHRA definition to close down an event that is legitimately critical of Israel and is therefore not anti-Semitic in the proper sense of manifesting hatred, discrimination or prejudice towards Jewish people.

Moreover, British law has never provided a right to freedom of expression akin to the First Amendment. The Human Rights Act (1998), the Communications Act (2008) and the Public Order Act (1986), just to name a few, all provide extensive limits on freedom of expression for a number of purposes, including criminalizing forms of racial and religious discrimination.

However, its clear that what IfNotNow and its alliesreallyfear is the potential to use the IHRA definition to silence pro-Palestinian advocacy or anti-Zionist speech. During his speech, Herzallah alleged that government affairs director of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, Mark Weitzman, helped draft the definition exclusively to silence the BDS movement and criticism of Israel. But just because a definition of bigotrycan bemisusedto silence speech doesnt mean the definition itself is wrong. Any attempt to define bigotry, whether or not it involves Israel, is an attempt to marginalize certain hateful ideas and expressions.

For IfNotNow and its allies, the IHRA definitions acknowledgment of the connection between anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism likely hits too close to home, hence their crusade to smear it by any means necessary. Prominent Jewish organizations that publicly support the IHRA definition were not even spared IfNotNows ire during the eventtheirefforts to stand up for Israel and Jewish college students slurred as out of step with reality and a distraction from the fight against right-wing anti-Semitism (as if countering anti-Semitism is a zero-sum game). It was even suggested that longtime ADL national director Abe Foxman and renowned Holocaust scholar Deborah Lipstadt are confused about what anti-Semitism is [and] where it comes from, a particularly rich accusation from an organization that has accusedan American congressman of pandering to Jews and thatvowsto defeat the Jewish establishment.

All who value the safety, security and prosperity of Israel should recognize that the widespread campaign against the IHRA definition is merely the latest development in the ideological war against the countrys right to exist. Because the definition affirms that advocacy for stripping the Jewish people of self-determination is anti-Semitic, proponents of this discriminatory goal counter by dishonestly presenting their ideas as a fight for justice. In the process, they denounce the criminalization of BDS that doesnt exist and slander Jewish organizations astute enough to recognize that the demonization of Israel too often leads to the demonization of Jews.

We should not let these dangerous efforts go unchallenged.

Georgia Leatherdale-Gilholy is aCAMERA on Campus UK Associate. Zac Schildcrout is the managing editor for CAMERA on Campus.

Excerpt from:
IfNotNow smears IHRA definition as a 'threat' to progressivism - JNS.org

More than $190000 awarded in Community Placemaking Grants – Metro newsfeed

Posted By on February 19, 2021

It took two rounds and two days of deliberation to narrow down an impressive pool of 95 applicants for the 2021 cycle of Metros Community Placemaking Grants. The twelve recipients were selected by an advisory group of community members who work at the intersection of arts and social justice in the Portland region.

This years grants include efforts led by and directly supporting people experiencing homelessness, presently and formerly incarcerated people, Indigenous, Black and Latinx communities and BIPOC youth.

Camp E.L.S.O. Inc.: Your Street Your Voice ($20,000) Metros grant supports after school virtual programming where BIPOC youth will be paid to learn about the built environment and use design as a tool for racial justice. (North/Northeast Portland, Forest Grove, Parkrose, east Multnomah County, others locations TBD)

The AfroVillage Homebase ($20,000) The site owned by Home Forward will host a refurbished MAX car, pods, and a gathering space, becoming an incubator to test the community services, amenities and partnerships that will be the foundation of the AfroVillage, a broad reaching effort to meet the essential needs of people experiencing homelessness with a focus on racial disparities and inequities. (Portlands Albina neighborhood)

The Vanport Mosaic: Walking through Portland with a Panther - the life of Mr. Kent Ford, All Power ($20,000) Linking current social justice efforts to critical local history, this grant supports a new solo play that features the history, sites and stories of Black Portland leaders. (Virtual, various Portland locations including high schools)

Tin Can Phone ($7,200) An inclusive collective of presently and formerly incarcerated artists will work together in locations around the region to produce a podcast series of investigative journalism, mutual self-exploration and the restoration of people that have been significantly harmed by incarceration. (Virtual and various regional locations)

Friends of Noise/City Repair: Youth Power PDX ($19,500) Metros grant supports two cycles of a 3-4 month long leadership program in the planning, building and running of youth led events based towards intersectional social justice and art. (Virtual and Portland TBD)

Atabey Medicine Apprenticeship Program ($20,000) Atabey Medicine, in partnership with Wild Diversity, Brown Girl Rise, Mudbone Grown, Portland Plant Medicine and the City Repair Project, will use Metros grant to create a platform for healing by training the next generation of BIPOC healers and herbalists, connecting people to each other and the land. (Various regional locations)

Centro Cultural Del Condado De Washington: Arts + Cultural Events at Centro ($20,000) Metros grant supports five culturally specific events at Centro to build community and strengthen sense of belonging; to promote the visibility and cultural expression of Washington Countys Latinx community. (Virtual, Hillsboro, Cornelius and TBD Washington County)

Eena Festival ($5,250) An Indigenous-led festival in late 2021 will raise awareness about non-human led restoration, share education about Traditional Ecological Knowledge and create a safe, welcoming means to increase BIPOC access to nature. (Southwest Portland)

Community Development Corporation of Oregon: Food for All in Rockwood ($15,000) Addressing food security has never been more important. Metros grant will support Rockwood Speaks! sessions where paid, trusted community liaisons engage culturally specific groups about access to food and the 2-year food security work led by CDC of Oregon.

Hacienda CDC: Haciendas Portland Mercado ($15,000) Especially hard hit by COVID-19, Metros grant will help sustain the Portland Mercado and the community of Latinx entrepreneurs they support, and when safe, celebrate the resiliency of the community they serve with music, art and delicious food. (Southeast Portland)

Triple Echo Studios: We Can Be Heroes ($20,000) Project partners will create a 12-part STEAM focused comic book series and short film featuring Gresham landmarks and a BIPOC cast, crew and characters, with production sourcing resources and food from locally owned businesses. The series will be aimed toward 3rd graders and will be broadly distributed. (Virtual, Gresham)

Unite Oregon City: Oregon City Schools are "No Place for Hate" ($11,000) Metros grant will support a two-year collaboration between students, staff and parents working to address bullying and bias by bringing the Anti-Defamation Leagues No Place for Hate program to every school in the Oregon City School District.

Applications will open for the 2022 Community Placemaking grant cycle in early August 2021, will be due in late September and awards will be announced in early January 2022. Sign up here for updates. Metros Community Placemaking grant program helps people tackle community challenges or opportunities through creative, arts-based, equity-focused projects. Grants ranging from $5,000 to $25,000 support efforts that foster connection to place, strengthen social fabric and involve and benefit communities of color and other historically marginalized

Originally posted here:
More than $190000 awarded in Community Placemaking Grants - Metro newsfeed

Deadly inspirations – What their chosen reading says about America’s far-right | United States – The Economist

Posted By on February 19, 2021

PANDEMICS CAN have unexpected side-effects. One of them, according to a report last year by the New York Federal Reserve, may be a surge in support for extremist ideas. It observed how cities in Germany that suffered the most deaths from influenza by 1920 then voted in unusually large numbers for extreme-right parties, such as the Nazis, by the early 1930s. In the past year, too, according to studies in Britain and America, there has been a spurt in online searches for extremist content. Anger over lockdowns or loss of trust in government could be driving new interest.

Your browser does not support the

Enjoy more audio and podcasts on iOS or Android.

What texts might people be turning to? Researchers study literary habits of the far-right by monitoring reading lists traded on social media, texts promoted on podcasts or recited by enthusiasts as audiobooks on YouTube, output from right-fringe publishing houses and, most extreme, the diatribes that serve as manifestos of those who commit atrocities. Together they suggest several strands of hateful writing. Brian Hughes of American University in Washington, DC says that the sheer availability of online extremist ideology is, in part, responsible for the elevated rates of extremist mobilisation.

French writers have been strikingly influential, including those in the Nouvelle Droite movement. Alain de Benoist, an illiberal thinker, inspired members of Americas alt right such as Richard Spencer, a white supremacist. The works of a philosopher, Jean Renaud Gabriel Camus, also stand out. Ideas drawn from his book The Great Replacement (2011), are often repeated by those who say non-white immigration threatens Western countries. The book has been cited by mass shooters.

The work of another French writer, Jean Raspail, is championed by anti-immigrant activists in America. His dystopian novel from 1973, The Camp of the Saints, imagines the violent overrun of France by brown-skinned migrants. It is a weaponised retelling of an apocalyptic biblical parable, says Chelsea Stieber of Catholic University. The French understand it as literature, she says, whereas in America it gets to be this reality that could happen. Leading Republicans have promoted it, she points out, including Steve Bannon and Stephen Miller, both erstwhile close advisers of Donald Trump, as well as Steve King, a noxious ex-congressman from Iowa.

Apocalyptic writing is especially popular among a strand of the far-right known as accelerationists, meaning those who believe civilisation (or at least liberal democracy) will soon collapse. They hope the end can be hastened by violent acts or even civil war. In this vein an Italian fascist writer, Julius Evola, is also cited by Mr Bannon and Mr Spencer and lauded in far-right circles, along with his call for blowing everything up. He promoted an idea of heroic men who rise above history (Mussolini was a fan). Memes of him in his monocle are shared online by adoring followers.

Extremists turn to such writers because they justify using violence to clear the way for a supposed new golden age to begin. Others tell them how to achieve that. Siege, a book by James Mason of the American Nazi party, purports to be a guide to violent revolution. It had little impact when it was published in 1992, notes Graham Macklin of the Centre for Research on Extremism, in Oslo. But its rediscovery by neo-Nazis roughly five years ago has led to a surge of interest. PDFs of it are now shared widely online; the hashtag readSiege spreads periodically on social media. Now, its everywhere, he says.

The study of such writing matters, even if one researcher admits he feels like projectile vomiting while tackling some especially violent or cruel texts. Ideas can have deadly consequences, says Joanna Mendelson of the Anti-Defamation League. People are quoting and referencing books as a kind of reassurance that they are validated in their extremist views, she says. Many of the same ones reappear repeatedly among anti-Semitic and other extremist factions. A few, such as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (an anti-Semitic conspiracy originating from Russia in 1903), or the racist, eugenics-based writing of Lothrop Stoddard in the 1920s, are repeatedly rediscovered or reinterpreted by new writers. What used to be called eugenics, for example, is today dressed up as race realism.

One book is still considered the bible of the far right. The Turner Diaries, a barely readable novel from the 1970s by William Pierce, another American Nazi, imagines an insurrection by a group called Order against a government that promotes egalitarian values and gun control. It has supposedly sold 500,000 copies. One avid reader was Timothy McVeigh, who bombed a federal building in Oklahoma City in 1995, killing 168 people. (He used a lorry full of fertiliser and explosives, a method depicted in the novel.) Others were inspired to form a real-world paramilitary group, also called the Order.

Jared Holt, who researches domestic extremism at the Atlantic Council in Washington, says such books are still powerful. Veteran members of groups pass them on to younger ones. They are used to build ties between adherents, to test new initiates and ease the anxiety of some by giving a sense of purpose to their lives. He notes, too, how younger readers are finding new writing. One rambling, self-published book called Bronze Age Mindset, for example, has won a cult following, reportedly including staffers at Mr Trumps White House. It draws on ideas from Nietzsche and tells readers to prepare for the military rule that will soon begin in America. For some readers such bilious writing is appealing. Finding out why is a first step towards confronting it.

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline "Deadly inspirations"

Read more:
Deadly inspirations - What their chosen reading says about America's far-right | United States - The Economist

La-Z-Boy Announces Kurt Darrow to Retire as CEO; Will Remain Chairman of the Board – GlobeNewswire

Posted By on February 19, 2021

Kurt L. Darrow

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, La-Z-Boy Incorporated to retire as President and CEO effective April 25, 2021

Melinda D. Whittington

Chief Financial Officer, La-Z-Boy Incorporated to become President and Chief Executive Officer effective April 25, 2021

Robert G. Lucian

Vice President Finance, La-Z-Boy Incorporated to become Chief Financial Officer effective April 25, 2021

MONROE, Mich., Feb. 16, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- La-Z-Boy Incorporated (NYSE: LZB), a global leader in residential furniture, today announced that Kurt L. Darrow will retire from his positions as President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) on April 25, 2021, after more than 40 years of service to the company. His retirement follows the end of La-Z-Boys fiscal 2021 year. He will remain Chairman of the Board of Directors, in a non-executive capacity.

Reflecting the companys long-standing commitment to thoughtful succession planning, Melinda D. Whittington, Chief Financial Officer (CFO), was unanimously appointed by the Board to serve as President and CEO of La-Z-Boy Incorporated. Robert (Bob) G. Lucian, Vice President, Finance, will succeed Whittington in the role of CFO. In addition, Whittington was elected to serve on the Board of Directors, effective April 25, 2021.

Darrow stated, It has been an extraordinary honor to serve as La-Z-Boys President and CEO for the past 17 years, as well as Chairman of the Board since 2011. I have had the opportunity to watch and be part of this companys evolution from a manufacturer of a single product, the iconic La-Z-Boy recliner, to become the second-largest provider of residential furniture in the U.S., with a growing and vibrant La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries retail network. As a team, we have delivered long-term profitable growth in a dynamic industry, which has weathered monumental change. I am proud of every employee across our organization, all of whom have and continue to contribute to our success, and it has been a motivating and gratifying privilege to work with them while honoring the legacy of our founders and the values they instilled upon our company and culture.

Darrow added, On behalf of our Board of Directors, it is with great pleasure that we appoint Melinda as our next CEO. Her more than 30 years experience, including extensive consumer products expertise, proven capability in operational and financial matters, strategic vision and sharp focus, will guide the company forward as the landscape for home furnishings continues to evolve. It is the right time for Melinda to take the helm. Her strategic acumen and demonstrated leadership skills position her to successfully lead La-Z-Boy to and through its next chapter of growth. The company is in excellent shape and, as I step away from the day-to-day operations, I have every confidence Melinda and our top-tier leadership team will leverage the many opportunities that lie ahead for La-Z-Boy.

W. Alan McCollough, Lead Director of the Board, said: Kurt has made a significant impact on La-Z-Boy Incorporated. During his tenure as CEO, he strengthened the La-Z-Boy brand, honed the companys portfolio, championed and evolved the companys integrated-retail strategy and entered the company into the e-commerce arena. Kurts vision for the future helped transform La-Z-Boys global supply chain into a value-creating asset and set the company on a course for continued growth and profitability. Kurt led the company through two of the most challenging times in its history, the Great Recession and, more recently, through uncharted territory resulting from the global COVID-19 pandemic. La-Z-Boy was fortunate to have a CEO of his caliber. On behalf of the Board and the entire La-Z-Boy organization, I thank him for his many contributions to the company and look forward to his continued leadership of our Board.

Whittington said, I am honored by the opportunity to lead La-Z-Boy, with its rich and storied 94-year history and iconic brand. We have a solid platform from which to grow and prosper and a bright future ahead. Our team is proven, passionate and skilled, and we will capitalize on opportunities for future growth and innovation, including the build out of our omnichannel presence while we help consumers turn their houses into homes. I would like to thank Kurt and the Board for placing their trust and confidence in me as I move into the CEO role and lead a company made up of people with extraordinary talent and dedication.

Whittington added, I look forward to working with Bob as our new CFO. With his strong financial expertise and business acumen, including more than three decades of experience at The Procter and Gamble Company (P&G), he will seamlessly move into the CFO role. During his last two years as La-Z-Boys VP, Finance, he brought meaningful improvement to the organizations finance processes and business decision making. Im confident he will continue to provide financial and business leadership as our CFO.

About Kurt L. DarrowKurt Darrow joined La-Z-Boy in 1979, moved through the ranks of the organization, and was named President and CEO in 2003 and Chairman in 2011. An out-of-the-box strategist, Darrow accelerated the companys transformation from solely a chair manufacturer to one that manufactures and offers stylish and aspirational furniture for every room in the home. Under his leadership, La-Z-Boy became one of the most recognized brands in the furniture industry, is the largest reclining chair manufacturer worldwide, and is the second-largest manufacturer/distributor of residential furniture in the U.S. Darrow is also credited for the rapid expansion and evolution of the companys branded distribution system into one of the largest in the industry, the companys integrated-retail strategy, and the global supply chain transformation that established the companys unique positioning in the marketplace where it offers consumers the option of mass customization with quick delivery.

Within the furniture industry, Darrow has held numerous prominent roles at the American Home Furnishings Alliance (AHFA), the American Furniture Hall of Fame Foundation, Inc., and currently serves as an Executive Board Member of the Anti-Defamation Leagues Furniture Division. He was inducted into the American Home Furnishings Hall of Fame in 2018, was honored in 2015 with the City of Hope Spirit of Life Award, received the Distinguished Service Award in 2013 from the AHFA and, in 2003, was the recipient of the Anti-Defamation Leagues American Heritage Award. Darrow is a member of the Board of Directors for CMS Energy Corporation, and the Board and Executive Committee of Business Leaders for Michigan. He also serves on the ProMedica Board of Trustees. Darrow earned a BA in business administration and an Honorary Doctorate from Adrian College and served as a member of the colleges Board of Trustees from 2002 to 2011.

About Melinda D. WhittingtonMelinda D. Whittington joined La-Z-Boy in 2018 as Chief Financial Officer, bringing more than 30 years of experience to the role, where she leads the global finance and accounting team responsible for external reporting, financial planning and analysis, investor relations, internal audit, treasury and risk management and the tax function. Prior to joining La-Z-Boy, Whittington served as Chief Financial Officer for Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, a publicly traded, healthcare information technology solutions company. Prior to that, Whittington was Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer for Kraft Foods Group, Inc. (now The Kraft Heinz Company), one of North Americas largest consumer packaged food and beverage companies. There, she led a team of employees responsible for external reporting, shared accounting services, treasury, financial planning and analysis, overheads and tax. From 1993 to 2014, Whittington held various finance leadership roles at The Procter and Gamble Company (P&G), including Finance Director, Global Home Products; Finance Director, Corporate Accounting; and Associate Finance Director for Global Business Services. Her roles included international experiences in Belgium and Costa Rica. Whittington currently serves on the board of the YMCA of Monroe, Michigan and is a member of the Ohio State University Fisher College of Business Deans Advisory Council. She is a summa cum laude graduate of Ohio State University, earning her BS in business administration. She is also a certified public accountant.

About Robert (Bob) G. LucianBob Lucian joined La-Z-Boy in 2019 as Vice President, Finance, where he is focused on sustainably improving monthly and annual business forecasting and planning processes, capital budgeting, market pricing and financial analysis of supply chain network design and new product opportunities. Prior to joining La-Z-Boy, Lucian was with Coty Inc. as CFO North America Professional Beauty, responsible for integrating P&Gs Professional Hair Care business into Cotys Professional Nail Care business. Prior to that, Lucian spent 32 years at P&G in positions of increasing responsibility in multiple business units, Corporate Finance, New Business Development, and Global Supply Chain Finance. He holds an MBA in finance and international business from the University of Cincinnati and is a cum laude graduate of the University of Notre Dame where he earned a BS in chemical engineering.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Generally, forward-looking statements include information concerning expectations, projections or trends relating to our results of operations, financial results, financial condition, strategic initiatives and plans, expenses, dividends, share repurchases, liquidity, use of cash and cash requirements, borrowing capacity, investments, future economic performance, business, and industry and the effect of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on our business operations and financial results.

The forward-looking statements in this press release are based on certain assumptions and currently available information and are subject to various risks and uncertainties, many of which are unforeseeable and beyond our control, such as the continuing and developing impact of, and uncertainty caused by, the COVID-19 pandemic. Additional risks and uncertainties that we do not presently know about or that we currently consider to be immaterial may also affect our business operations and financial results. Our actual future results and trends may differ materially depending on a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties discussed in our fiscal 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K and other factors identified in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Given these risks and uncertainties, you should not rely on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. We are including this cautionary note to make applicable and take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or for any other reason.

Additional Information

This news release is just one part of La-Z-Boys financial disclosures and should be read in conjunction with other information filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which is available at: https://lazboy.gcs-web.com/financial-information/sec-filings. Investors and others wishing to be notified of future La-Z-Boy news releases, SEC filings and quarterly investor conference calls may sign up at: https://lazboy.gcs-web.com/.

Background Information

La-Z-Boy Incorporated is one of the worlds leading residential furniture producers, marketing furniture for every room of the home. The Wholesale segment includes England, La-Z-Boy, American Drew, Hammary, and Kincaid.The company-owned Retail segment includes 158 of the 351 La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries stores. Joybird is an e-commerce retailer and manufacturer of upholstered furniture.

The corporations branded distribution network is dedicated to selling La-Z-Boy Incorporated products and brands, and includes 351 stand-alone La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries stores and 563 independent Comfort Studio locations, in addition to in-store gallery programs for the companys Kincaid and England operating units. Additional information is available at http://www.la-z-boy.com/.

Photos accompanying this announcement are available athttps://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/25e3882f-54f1-4f8e-aee8-1f679c4ad6e4https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/8622a9cd-e85a-4374-8368-ea912fbd2b58https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/7e60d617-6a27-400e-8dd1-4fe780435c90

Contact: Kathy Liebmann(734) 241-2438 kathy.liebmann@la-z-boy.com

See the article here:
La-Z-Boy Announces Kurt Darrow to Retire as CEO; Will Remain Chairman of the Board - GlobeNewswire


Page 840«..1020..839840841842..850860..»

matomo tracker