Page 941«..1020..940941942943..950960..»

Seven Months Of COVID-19 Cost U.S. Half As Many Lives As Nearly Four Years Of World War II – Above the Law

Posted By on October 8, 2020

World War II was the deadliest armed conflict in world history. Almost all of the worlds countries were involved, and the United States played a major role. From the surprise attack at Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, to Japans eventual signing of formal surrender documents onboard the USS Missouri on September 2, 1945, U.S. troops fought and died during nearly four years of brutal combat in theaters that spanned the globe.

According to the National WWII Museum, the United States suffered 416,800 military deaths throughout the course of the conflict. With civilian deaths included, the U.S. lost 418,500 to World War II. At the time, there were hardly any American families that didnt have members serving in uniform. By the end of WWII, almost everyone knew someone who had perished in the war effort.

The war deaths were an immediate, stinging reminder of the stakes. But the historical echoes of World War II reverberate even today, eight decades later. It profoundly changed the world.

There were those who spoke out against the U.S. becoming involved in WWII. Most of them fell silent after Pearl Harbor. Later, when it became clear what the Germans were doing to Jews under Nazi leadership, a virulent strain of right-wing Holocaust denial took root it survives (and in some dark circles, thrives) to this day.

But even among those who thought the U.S. should stay out of World War II, or who denied the full depth of the atrocities committed by the Nazis, almost nobody simply denied that World War II was happening. Almost nobody downplayed its seriousness. Almost nobody said that we should not worry about WWII, because it was mostly killing only young men within a certain age range, and therefore the vast majority of Americans had nothing to worry about.

The first U.S. case of COVID-19 was reported in January, but the deaths did not begin to trickle in on a large scale until late March of this year. New York recorded its first COVID-19 death on March 14, and from there things quickly got worse. There were many days this spring when more than 2,000 Americans were dying of the virus every day. Throughout the summer and into the fall, there have been repeated spikes of more than 1,000 deaths per day.

As I write this, the United States has lost at least 209,600 people to the coronavirus. By the time this article goes to print, that number will have increased by hundreds, and by the time youre reading it, that number likely will have increased by thousands. From mid-March of this year to early October, we lost half as many Americans to COVID-19 as we lost to WWII, with no end in sight.

In response to a previous column about COVID-19, I got a piece of hate mail. The medical examiner apparently deemed the cause of death of this correspondents loved one to be COVID-19, whereas he claimed, using some pretty colorful language, it was dementia. President Donald Trump, who is himself laid up with a case of COVID-19, was an early and vocal denier of the seriousness of the coronavirus, and his legions of unthinking supplicants were quick to follow suit. There are millions of these people in the U.S. They will defend the backward idea of COVID-19 being a hoax that every educated person everywhere is in on, even as theyre losing their own family members and as their president convalesces with the virus. I bet no grieving family members during WWII ever got together at a wake and waved away the seriousness of war because their loved one would have died of something else eventually anyway.

The deaths matter though. The U.S. was a very different place in the early 1940s. We had a smaller population. We had a president who was a tested leader, not one who is a failed, barely literate real estate developer. We were more united (maybe more united than at any other time in our national history). But then, just like now, we couldnt simply soak up the deaths of hundreds of thousands of our countrymen without effect.

It took less than seven months to lose half as many Americans to COVID-19 as we lost to almost four years of WWII. Even if the deaths stopped today, this pandemic is going to change America. I just hope enough of us make the right decision as to how.

Jonathan Wolf is a litigation associate at a midsize, full-service Minnesota firm. He also teaches as an adjunct writing professor at Mitchell Hamline School of Law, has written for a wide variety of publications, and makes it both his business and his pleasure to be financially and scientifically literate. Any views he expresses are probably pure gold, but are nonetheless solely his own and should not be attributed to any organization with which he is affiliated. He wouldnt want to share the credit anyway. He can be reached at jon_wolf@hotmail.com.

Follow this link:

Seven Months Of COVID-19 Cost U.S. Half As Many Lives As Nearly Four Years Of World War II - Above the Law

Europe cant fight Jew-hatred without a working definition of anti-Semitism – The Times of Israel

Posted By on October 8, 2020

In the summer of 2014, a synagogue in Wuppertal, Germany was firebombed. Accepting the explanation of the three Palestinian Germans who committed the arson but told the court they were demonstrating against Israels war in Gaza, the judge ruled the attack an act of protest rather than anti-Semitism.

Jewish leaders and German Federal officials were outraged. Surely, there should be no question that setting fire to a synagogue is an anti-Semitic act. But even this certainty was in doubt if it involves Israel.

When Europe witnessed a resurgence of anti-Semitism nearly twenty years ago, many officials dismissed attacks on Jews as political expressions by demonstrators against Israel. By substituting the word Zionist for Jew it appeared that the most hateful, antisemitic expressions could be excused.

Get The Times of Israel's Daily Edition by email and never miss our top storiesFree Sign Up

But some pushed back.

Notable among them was US Secretary of State Colin Powell, who told the fifty-five nation Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in 2004, It is not antisemitic to criticize the policies of the state of Israel. But the line is crossed when Israel or its leaders are demonized or vilified, for example by the use of Nazi symbols and racist caricatures.

The IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism has been employed by dozens of countries to aid police and other authorities responsible for monitoring and identifying antisemitic incidents

The OSCE declared in 2004 that international developments or political issues, including those in Israel or elsewhere in the Middle East, never justify antisemitism.

To effectively combat anti-Semitism, defining it in all its forms was essential. In 2005, the EUs Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC), drawing on the advice of experts from Europe, Israel and the US, developed a Working Definition of Antisemitism with a set of clear examples. While many recognized hatred and prejudice toward Jews as anti-Semitism, fewer were aware that stereotypes and conspiracy theories about Jews are anti-Semitic, and that Holocaust denial is not a subject for historical debate but an attack on Jewish memory. There also were examples relating to Israel such as those described by Secretary Powell.

This comprehensive definition was adopted by the 31 countries of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) in 2016. The IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism has been employed by dozens of countries to aid police and other authorities responsible for monitoring and identifying antisemitic incidents. It is an integral tool in the training of prosecutors and judges.

The UN Secretary General and the European Parliament have recommended that countries use it. The European Council has called on all member states to use it. Nearly 30 countries have adopted it, including Sweden and Spain, which have some of the most strident voices criticizing Israel.

The Working Definition also has received bipartisan American support. The State Department, under Democratic and Republican Administrations, has been using it in its worldwide efforts to monitor anti-Semitism. Congressional legislation in 2017 recommended its use.

Today, the spread of anti-Semitism and other forms of group hatred and intolerance on social media is beyond the control of individual governments. That is why Facebook and other social media platforms face increasing calls to curb this incitement. American Jewish Committee (AJC) and many other organizations have recommended using the Working Definition to better identify anti-Semitism when it appears.

The same critics who have opposed every use of the Working Definition in the past have raised their voices again. If social media companies use the Working Definition to identify and censure antisemitic incitement, these critics say, they may also remove legitimate posts that should enjoy free speech protection. That is possible but those responsible for these monitoring efforts should learn to identify what is anti-Semitism in the first place.

The European experience makes it difficult to argue that the Working Definition limits speech and inhibits Israel critics. And the First Amendment offers even more robust protection in the United States. Thus, critics are left to claim it will have a chilling effect on speech.

But the Working Definition fundamentally is an educational tool to help government authorities and civil society to understand anti-Semitism and recognize it in its multiple forms. IHRA stipulates that it is a non-legally binding definition. It is not a speech code, although we recognize that some people may try to make it one.

The Working Definition is an essential, effective tool in the fight against anti-Semitism. Like any tool, it can be misused, and we should guard against that. But that is hardly an argument for not employing it at all.

The EU understands this. You cant fight what you cant define. The working definition of antisemitism by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance is the benchmark, Margaritis Schinas, Vice President of the European Commission, said at a recent EU conference.

It is a standard for all who are committed to combating anti-Semitism, in the US and abroad, on social media and in the physical world. Use it.

Rabbi Andrew Baker is AJCs Director of International Jewish Affairs, and the Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office on Combating Antisemitism.

Holly Huffnagle is AJCs US Director for Combating Antisemitism. Follow her @HHuffnagleAJC

Read the original post:

Europe cant fight Jew-hatred without a working definition of anti-Semitism - The Times of Israel

TikTok users still see widespread anti-Semitism on app – Fox Business

Posted By on October 8, 2020

Congressional sources tell FOX Business Charlie Gasparino that top GOP senators on TikTok say they were notified by CFIUS on coming new guidelines.

TikTok updated the public on how it countersanti-Semitism and other hate speech in August, but a cursory search on the massively popular social media platform reveals countless anti-Semitic comments and videos.

For instance, this video featuring Jewish culture received numerous comments referencing the Holocaust, such as "ayo gas chamber invite check" and"i heard your CONCENTRATION was powerful back then," as well as dozens of comments about using the Israeli flag as toilet paper.

Another video listing reasons to visit Israel received crude comments like "read to burn oven The great leader Hitlr" and other comments saying Israel isn't a real country.

TIKTOK SCAMMERS MAKE $500,000 BY PROMOTING FRAUDULENT APPS: REPORT

The Jerusalem Post talked to three anonymous Jewish TikTok users this week about the anti-Semitism they've experienced on the platform.

One user, Eli, told the newspaper that after starting to post content about Israel, she started receiving death threats and calls to "bring back the Holocaust." Another user told The Jerusalem Post that she's received comments like Jews worship Satan andHitler did not kill enough [Jews].

TikTok said it has a zero-tolerance policy for anti-Semitism and other forms of hate.

TRUMP ADMIN TO 'VIGOROUSLY DEFEND' TIKTOK EXECUTIVE ORDER AFTER JUDGE BLOCKS BAN

"TikTok stands firmly against anti-Semitism and doesn't tolerate hate in any form," a TikTok spokesperson told FOX Business in a statement Thursday. "We take strong action against hate groups and ideologies by banning accounts and removing content, including those which deny the Holocaust or other violent tragedies. Our team is fully committed to fostering a community where everyone feels welcome and safe to create."

Eric Hahn, head of safety for TikTok US, posted an update on its policies Aug. 20, saying that the company has removed over 64,000 hateful comments, taken down380,000 videos, and banned 1,300 accounts for violating its hate-speech policies.

"We have a zero-tolerance stance on organized hate groups and those associated with them, like accounts that spread or are linked to white supremacy or nationalism, male supremacy, anti-Semitism, and other hate-based ideologies," he wrote."In addition, we remove race-based harassment and the denial of violent tragedies, such as the Holocaust and slavery."

TRUMP'S TIKTOK DOWNLOAD BAN IS BLOCKED BY JUDGE

Policing the app is a tall order as it has been downloaded more than 2 billion times, according to mobile app research firm Sensor Tower. Earlier this year, it was downloaded more times in the first quarter of 2020 than any app in history, generating 315 million downloads between Apple's App Store and Googe Play.

TikTok partnered with Oracle and Walmartthis monthto try to win the blessings of both the United States government and the Chinese government to continue to operate. The companies are currently trying to finalize the deal.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE STORIES ON FOX BUSINESS

Continued here:

TikTok users still see widespread anti-Semitism on app - Fox Business

On the Move: East Valley JCC, Arizona ADL and Valley Beit Midrash – Jewish News of Greater Phoenix

Posted By on October 8, 2020

Lerner joins Arizona regional advisory board for the ADL

In September, Marc Lerner began a two-year term as the chair of the Anti-Defamation League regional advisory board.

A hearing attorney for Mercy Care, board member of the Ryan House and past president of Congregation Beth Israel, Lerner holds an MBA from the W.P. Carey School of Business and a law degree from the Sandra Day OConnor College of Law at Arizona State University. He succeeds former board chair Donna Pollack Johnson, who guided the Arizona region for the last two years, including through the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The strength that Marc brings to the position of chair continues Donnas legacy of incredible leadership, said Tammy Gillies, interim regional director of the ADL Arizona. We are extremely grateful to Donna for her steady guidance during these challenging times, and we look forward to the bold, strategic vision Marc brings to the role of chair during a time when anti-Semitism and hate of all kinds continues to rise.

EVJCC hires controller drawn to community programs and nonprofit work

The East Valley JCC hired Charles Paltzer as its new controller after Charlie Reidhead, who served as the EVJCCs controller for more than 12 years, retired in September.

Paltzer said he was drawn to working at the East Valley JCC because of the agencys great work in community programs and early childhood education.

A passion for mission, community involvement and charitable work are what drive me, he said.

Paltzer moved to Arizona from Chicago in 2001. He previously served as director of global affairs at the Cardio Renal Society of America and as director of finance at the National Kidney Foundation of Arizona, and holds a bachelors degree in international accounting from Benedictine University.

We are very happy that Mr. Charlie Paltzer has joined the EVJCC as controller, said Rabbi Michael Beyo, CEO of the EVJCC. Charlie brings many years of nonprofit, as well as for-profit, experience in similar positions. He has an exceptional understanding of best procedures and policies that an organization needs to implement to serve the community. Last but not least, Mr. Paltzer is very dedicated to the EVJCCs mission and we are certain he will bring innovation and new ideas to our operations.

Valley Beit Midrash welcomes development manager

Jenny Pratt, the new development manager at Valley Beit Midrash, joined the organization in September. She previously served for two decades as chief executive officer of YWCA North Central Washington, a nonprofit with programs that focus on homeless housing, job training, social justice advocacy and education. As CEO, Pratt advocated for civil rights for women and girls, people of color, immigrants, the LGBTQ community and other marginalized groups.

Pratt holds a bachelors degree in business management from Wenatchee Valley College, is active in Rotary Club and serves as president of a free legal non-profit. JN

Original post:
On the Move: East Valley JCC, Arizona ADL and Valley Beit Midrash - Jewish News of Greater Phoenix

Facebook says it will now ban all pages supporting QAnon, the anti-Semitic conspiracy theory – Forward

Posted By on October 8, 2020

(JTA) Months after beginning to remove QAnon content discussing violence, Facebook and Instagram are now removing all pages and accounts representing the pro-Donald Trump conspiracy theory with anti-Semitic overtones.

QAnon is a false but growing conspiracy theory that alleges that a cabal of liberal, globalist elites sexually abuses children and harvests their blood, and wants to take down Trump. It has been endorsed by Republican candidates for Congress, and Trump has declined to condemn it. Officials say that it is also influencing voters ahead of next months election.

Scholars of anti-Semitism say the conspiracy theory is a new version of age-old anti-Semitic stereotypes regarding Jewish conspiratorial control of world affairs. They also say it echoes the blood libel, the anti-Semitic conspiracy theory claiming that Jews use the blood of non-Jewish children for ritual purposes.

Facebook first took action against QAnon in August, when it began removing 1,500 QAnon pages and groups that discussed violence. Now, it will remove all QAnon content, even if it doesnt explicitly refer to violence.

In August, before Facebook began taking action against QAnon, its affiliated groups had millions of members on Facebook, according to NBC. Its content is often created and spread by its adherents, which means that it has subsumed other conspiracy theories and expanded in scope as it has attracted more followers.

While weve removed QAnon content that celebrates and supports violence, weve seen other QAnon content tied to different forms of real world harm, Facebook said in a statement. Additionally, QAnon messaging changes very quickly and we see networks of supporters build an audience with one message and then quickly pivot to another.

The action by Facebook comes after a summer in which a coalition of civil rights groups, including the Anti-Defamation League, led an advertising boycott of Facebook to protest what they called its failure to adequately combat hate speech.

Link:
Facebook says it will now ban all pages supporting QAnon, the anti-Semitic conspiracy theory - Forward

Are the Proud Boys anti-Semitic? A primer on the far-right group – Jewish Community Voice

Posted By on October 8, 2020

Who are the Proud Boys, the far-right group that Donald Trump name-checked at the first presidential debate? And do they hate Jews?

The answer to the second question: Some of themincluding their foundercertainly do.

Lets back up: At the debate, moderator Chris Wallace asked Trump whether he would condemn white supremacists from the debate stage. He did not. What he did say, amid denunciations of the far-left Antifa, was this:

Proud Boys, stand back and stand by, but Ill tell you what, somebodys gotta do something about Antifa and the left because this is not a right-wing problem, this is a left-wing problem.

The group Trump referred to, the Proud Boys, is a far-right, western chauvinist fraternal organization founded by Gavin McInnes that supports Trump and has engaged in street violence. Anti-Semitism is not core to the groups ideology, but according to the Anti-Defamation League, the group has allied with white supremacists, and McInnes has made a series of anti-Semitic statements. The ADL estimates that it has several hundred members.

A former member of the Proud Boys, Jason Kessler, was the primary organizer of the 2017 white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, which Joe Biden again criticized for its anti-Semitism during the debate. Chapters of the Proud Boys have marched with neo-Nazis on other occasions as well.

Just as members of the Boogaloo Bois, another far-right group, frequently wear Hawaiian shirts, the Proud Boys have adopted a specific quasi-uniform, in their case a black polo shirt with yellow trim produced by the British company Fred Perry. The company announced that it would stop selling the shirts and issued a forceful statement reiterating its top executives previous condemnation of the Proud Boys.

Fred Perry, the Englishman who founded the company in 1952, started a business with a Jewish businessman from Eastern Europe. Its a shame we even have to answer questions like this. No, we dont support the ideals or the group that you speak of. It is counter to our beliefs and the people we work with, John Flynn, the companys chair, said in 2017 and again in the new statement.

And, in case anyone has any doubts, the Proud Boys are a virulent strain of American right-wing extremism, ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt tweeted following the debate. They have a long track record of violence, including in Portland this past weekend.

He wrote that Trump owes America an apology or an explanation. Now.

McInnes made two videos surrounding a 2017 trip to Israel, including one originally titled 10 things I hate about the Jews that contained an anti-Semitic rant.

In that video, he said Jews have a whiny paranoid fear of Nazis.

I felt myself defending the super far-right Nazis just because I was sick of so much brainwashing and I felt like going, Well, they never said it didnt happen. What theyre saying is that it was much less than 6 million and that they starved to death and they werent gassed, that they didnt have supplies, he said in the second video, before adding, Im not saying it wasnt gassing.

He also blamed Jews for Josef Stalins starvation of millions of Ukrainians. I think it was 10 million Ukrainians that were killed, he said. That was by Jews. That was by Marxist, Stalinist, left-wing, commie, socialist Jews.

Update: Since the debate, members of the Proud Boys have printed the phrase Stand back, stand by on t-shirts they are selling. Cassie Miller, a research analyst at the Southern Poverty Law Center, said regarding the Proud Boys that Trumps recent statement at the debate is something that emboldened them, that thrilled them, and that will add some legitimacy to the group.

Later, Trump told reporters, I dont know who the Proud Boys are, and Whoever they are they need to stand down.

Go here to read the rest:
Are the Proud Boys anti-Semitic? A primer on the far-right group - Jewish Community Voice

Committee talks rebranding of Waterloo Police insignia – kwwl.com

Posted By on October 8, 2020

WATERLOO, Iowa (KWWL) - Waterloo community members and police officers joined together to talk about possible changes to the Waterloo police insignia.

"I want all of you to be the example of working together," Mayor Quentin Hart said to all 12 voting members and four nonvoting members for the commitee.

The nonvoting members include at-large council members Sharon Juon and Dave Boesen, along with two local students.

The group met on zoom after Waterloo City Council approved a resolution allowing the committee to form. There are different feelings about the logo, it features ared griffin with a green eye on a gold background that was adopted in 1964.

Police say the patch is traditional carrying on vigilance, while some community members said the griffin represents the Ku Klux Klan dragon.

Waterloo police reported in August, the Anti-Defamation League had been contacted and found no connection between a griffin and any hate groups.

Members of the committee plan to meet the first Wednesday of every month through zoom. For the first time, the members talked their thoughts on the griffin insignia and an ideal relationship between police and residents.

The current logo received words like "divisive," "aggressive," "fear," "courage," and guardianship amongst committee members. Committee members said words pertaining to an ideal police relationship were "respect," "essential," "service" and "support."

The words said during the meeting are supposed to be passed on to designers for public submissions.

In future meetings, the group will discuss color scheme, wording and replacement costs at its next meeting in November.

Public submissions will be accepted through 2020. The commitee will consider designs that include a griffin and other designs.

"A lot of us have the same words, we may view them a little differently, and speak a little differently, but we're not as far off as people think we are," Waterloo Police and Co-Chair Major Joe Leibold said.

The first deadline for the committee will be in February, where they will present financial recommendations to the city council.

The next meeting will be Nov. 4 at 3 p.m. on Zoom.

Comments on the meeting can be directed here at his email address, comments@waterloo-ia.org

See more here:
Committee talks rebranding of Waterloo Police insignia - kwwl.com

Nazi comparisons have long been off-limits for American Jews. But not this year. – Connecticut Jewish Ledger

Posted By on October 8, 2020

By Ron Kampeas

(JTA) Is it OK to compare Donald Trump to a Nazi?

In line with their longtime opposition to such rhetoric, antisemitism watchdog groups are speaking out against the use of Nazi comparisons to attack Trump and his administration.

But that bright line appears to be blurring for many with the president stepping up his efforts to discredit the election results in November and refusing to promise a peaceful transfer of power should he lose to Joe Biden.

The immediate flashpoint in the debate is a new 30-second ad released Tuesday, Sept. 29 by the Jewish Democratic Council of America that draws parallels between the rise of fascism in Germany and the Trump presidency.

In swift and strong rebukes, the antisemitism watchdogs condemned the ad as offensive. One came from the Anti-Defamation League, which has been anything but shy in calling out a range of Trumps statements and actions.

However, some endorsed the ad, notably the prominent Holocaust scholar Deborah Lipstadt and the ADLs former longtime national director, Abraham Foxman, himself a Holocaust survivor. They expressed sympathy for such concerns about the state of America under Trump.

On Tuesday night, the Jewish Democratic Council was playing up its ad, connecting its ominous message to Trumps failure to condemn white supremacists in his first debate with Biden, the Democratic nominee. Instead, Trump appeared to instruct an extremist right-wing group, the Proud Boys, to stand back and stand by.

The condemnations of the ad were part of the longstanding effort of Jewish groups to make Nazi and Holocaust comparisons taboo. But a growing number of historians, activists, politicians and journalists many, but not all of them liberals or Democrats have taken up the line that Trump and his administration are deploying rhetoric and breaking norms in a manner similar to the Nazis as they rose to power and took control of Germany.

The Jewish Democrats ad contrasts images from the rise of fascism in Europe in the 1930s with images from the nearly four years of the Trump presidency. They include neo-Nazi marchers in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017, Trump speaking at a rally and the massacre of 11 Jews in the 2018 Pittsburgh synagogue shooting. A synagogue defaced with graffiti in the present day is presented alongside photos of graffitied Jewish shops in the 30s.

Titled Hate doesnt stop itself, it must be stopped, the ad implies that Trump is responsible for the antisemitism of the far right. It comes days after Biden said Trump is sort of like Goebbels, referencing the Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels.

You say the lie long enough, keep repeating it, repeating it, repeating it, it becomes common knowledge, Biden said on MSNBC.

The ADL did not directly weigh in on Bidens Goebbels comment, but it did issue a sharp condemnation of the Jewish Democratic Councils ad.

This has no place in the presidential race and is deeply offensive to the memories of 6M+ Jews systematically exterminated during the Shoah, tweeted Jonathan Greenblatt, the ADLs CEO. [T]he hate [and] extremism in this race is alarming and should be repudiated unambiguously. Elected leaders who engage in lying, scapegoating, and routinely call for violence should be condemned, full stop. At the same time, we urge leaders & their surrogates to refrain from invoking the #Holocaust in the context of the current election. It is not the same. Stay focused on the issues.

The American Jewish Committee and Simon Wiesenthal Center also called for the ad to be taken down.

The Jewish Democratic Council did not appear to be chastened by the condemnations from legacy groups. Its executive director, Halie Soifer, seized on Trumps Proud Boys moment to reinforce the ads message.

Trump just refused to condemn white nationalism, she said on Twitter, reposting the ad. He called on Proud Boys and others featured in this ad to stand-up and stand-by. (Trump, in fact, said Stand back and stand by.)

Rep. Ted Deutch, a Florida Democrat who is a leader in the unofficial Jewish congressional caucus, said it was Trump who had pushed boundaries.

Does the ad seem to push the boundaries? It does, he said Wednesday. But last night Donald Trump once again obliterated the boundaries when he refused to condemn white supremacists.

Soifer said in an interview that the ad is set to play on web platforms in swing states with substantial Jewish populations, including Florida, and a TV ad buy was being considered. In a text to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, she noted the expressions of joy that Trumps stand by call elicited from white supremacists on social media.

The presidents blatant refusal to condemn white supremacists which has clearly incited the Proud Boys underscores the importance of our message, she said. I hope those who are concerned by the presidents words last night understand that the urgent warning in our ad that hate does not stop itself, it must be stopped is both accurate and timely.

In a sign of how disorienting the discourse has become, Greenblatt found himself condemning Trump on Twitter hours after he had condemned the Jewish Democratic Council for analogizing Trumps presidency to the rise of fascism.

Trump owes America an apology or an explanation, the ADL leader said.

The ADL and the Wiesenthal Center stood by their statements condemning the ad after Trumps Proud Boys episode on Tuesday. The Wiesenthal Center said it is extremely disappointed and troubled that President Trump did not explicitly denounce white supremacists. He needs to.

The Jewish Democratic Council did not exactly come empty-handed to the debate over whether invoking Nazi comparisons was legitimate when talking about Trump. Lipstadt, the Holocaust historian, argued that in fact it was fine to compare 1930s Germany and what critics call Trumps breaking of norms.

Lipstadt, who has been tapped by administrations of both parties for her Holocaust-related expertise, also stressed that the ad made use of images of Nazi Germany but not of the Holocaust itself.

I would say in the attacks were seeing on the press, the courts, academic institutions, elected officials and even, and most chillingly, the electoral process, that this deserves comparison, she said in a videoconference hosted Tuesday by the Jewish Democratic Council. Its again showing how the publics hatred can be whipped up against Jews. Had the ad contained imagery of the Shoah, I wouldnt be here today.

Likening a political opponent to Nazis has long been a taboo that some leading Jewish institutions and organizations have sought to enforce: The Holocaust was unprecedented and unmatched since in the breadth of its horror and its ambition, the total destruction of the Jews. Comparisons, the argument went, diminished the Holocaust and deprived its lessons of the potency to prevent its recurrence.

Lipstadt has taken that stance in the past.

When you take these terrible moments in our history, and you use it for contemporary purposes in order to fulfill your political objectives, you mangle history, you trample on it, she told Haaretz in 2011.

But in the current era, Lipstadt said, the key to acceptable Holocaust comparisons is precision and nuance.

I do think certain comparisons are fitting, said Lipstadt. Its certainly not 1938, when Nazis led the Kristallnacht pogroms throughout Germany. Its not even September 1935, and the Nuremberg Laws institutionalizing racist policies. What it well might be is December 1932, Hitler comes to power on Jan. 30, 1933 it might be Jan. 15, 1933.

Foxman, the former ADL director, has long spoken out against Nazi comparisons.

Germany did have institutions and they did have democracy and it did fall apart so, yeah, its not Germany, and its not Nazism, but our antennas are quivering, Foxman told JTA.

Soifer, the Jewish Democratic Councils leader, defended the ads tone.

Were not calling Donald Trump a Nazi, she said. We are warning against the ominous parallel of the rise of Nazism and the use of hatred for political purposes and the numerous signs that Donald Trump is doing the same.

The Republican Jewish Coalition condemned the ad.

The rule in debate is that if your only argument is to call your opponent a Nazi, you have no argument at all, RJC Executive Director Matt Brooks said in a statement.

Brooks on Twitter called on Lipstadt to address the ad. Lipstadt directly replied in the Zoom call, saying Trump was emulating Goebbels in repeating a lie until his followers had internalized it.

Foxman said the intensification of hatred, including the rise of antisemitic attacks and attacks on other minorities, did not have to rise to the level of Nazism to set off alarms.

There is serious hate out there which is reminiscent of the hate that we lived through, part of our history, he said. Jewish antennas quiver it doesnt have to be Nazism to worry us that hate is out there, and hate is not being challenged.

Main Photo: A screengrab from an ad by the Jewish Democratic Council of Americareleased on Sept. 29, 2020. The ad draws parallels between the riseof fascism in Germany and the Trump presidency.(YouTube)

See more here:
Nazi comparisons have long been off-limits for American Jews. But not this year. - Connecticut Jewish Ledger

Proud Boys presence in North Carolina according to SPLC – WCNC.com

Posted By on October 8, 2020

The group is described as a fraternity of pro western, chauvinist men and tied to several violent incidents in recent protests.

CHARLOTTE, N.C. In the wake of Tuesday's presidential debate, there has been significant confusion and chatter about the "Proud Boys," a self described pro western chauvinist fraternity for men.

The group is classified as a hate group by the southern poverty law center and has been tied to several violent incidents in recent protests.

"They are anti women, they're very misogynistic." Jeremy Shaver with the anti-defamation league explained.

"They are ant immigrant and xenophobic.They are anti-muslim and islamaphobic, the also hold some viewpoints that are very dangerous to the LGBTQ community, particularly the transgender community."

The SPLCtracks where various hate groups congregate theyve identified 32 in North Carolina, including the "proud boys."

Its not publicly known exactly where in North Carolina the group meets only that they have a "statewide presence."

Now democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and others on both sides of the aisle calling for the president to further denounce the group.

"My message to the proud boys and every other white supremacist group is cease and desist," Biden said on the campaign trail following the debate.

On Wednesday, Trump again addressed the issue saying I dont know who the proud boys are, they have to stand down, let law enforcement do their work."

The anti-defamation league also warns many of these groups focus on recruiting young people targeting even middle and high schoolers, primarily online. Parents are encouraged to keep a close eye on their kids internet habits, especially in these turbulent times.

See more here:
Proud Boys presence in North Carolina according to SPLC - WCNC.com

Everything ‘potentially up for grabs’: What Jewish groups are watching for in this unusual Supreme Court session – JTA News – Jewish Telegraphic…

Posted By on October 8, 2020

WASHINGTON (JTA) The uncertainty surrounding the makeup of the Supreme Court led to a quieter-than-normal kickoff for the courts 2021 decision-making season. But even with the little known about what the countrys highest court will consider, its clear that multiple issues of interest to Jewish advocates will be on the docket.

A challenge to a 1990 ruling that has galvanized religious freedom advocates for years is before the court, as is a voting rights case. And if Amy Coney Barrett, President Donald Trumps nominee to replace Ruth Bader Ginsberg, is confirmed, the list could quickly grow. The same could happen if Trump is elected to a second term next month.

For one thing, cases that draw a 4-4 tie automatically revert to the lower courts ruling, making them a waste of the courts time. The court is currently configured five conservatives to three liberals, but Chief Justice John Roberts, a conservative, occasionally swings to join the liberals.

At this point, anything they havent taken could mean the court is not sure that theyre going to be able to get a majority until the ninth justice is confirmed, said Marc Stern, the American Jewish Committees legal counsel and a veteran court watcher.

Because four justices must agree to hear a case, Barretts confirmation would also make it easier for some kinds of cases to be taken up.

We know it only takes four justices to say, Yea to take a case, and we know from Judge Amy Coney Barretts background that shes hostile to the Affordable Care Act, certainly, and to Roe v. Wade, and precedent is definitely, she has stated, not a priority for her and so everything that we care about is potentially up for grabs, said Jody Rabhan, the policy chief for the National Council of Jewish Women.

Heres a glance at what Jewish groups are watching out for this coming session.

Adoption agencies and prospective foster parents face off in Philly

The rights of agencies that foster children versus the rights of their would-be parents also pits the American Jewish communitys Orthodox bodies against its civil rights groups.

In Fulton v. the City of Philadelphia, an adoption agency is challenging the city for cutting off funding because the agency would not place foster children with same-sex parents. The court will hear oral arguments on Nov. 4, the day after the election.

The Anti-Defamation League filed a friend of the court brief arguing that requiring Philadelphia to exempt religious agencies would roll back hard-fought discrimination protections.

Requiring such an exception for Petitioners in this case would cause a flood of demands for similar exemptions, undermining the efficacy of those laws in safeguarding vulnerable members of the population, including religious minorities and members of other marginalized communities, said the amicus brief, which cited cases in which Jewish parents have been denied the opportunity to foster children.

Joining the ADL on the amicus brief are an array of groups favoring church-state separations, including a whos who of the liberal Jewish establishment: Bend the Arc, Jewish Women International, Keshet, the National Council of Jewish Women and Truah.

Steve Freeman, the ADLs vice president of civil rights, said the adoption agency in the case was using religious freedom as a sword and not a shield to blunt the freedoms of others.

Because we have our religious views, we can use taxpayer dollars to refuse to allow gay couples to adopt a foster child to me should be a non-starter, he said.

Jewish groups lined up on the other side include the Orthodox Union and Agudath Israel of America. Both groups have signed onto amicus briefs on the side of the adoption agency, but not necessarily because they oppose placing foster children with same-sex couples.

Its not about what is the right or wrong approach for foster care and adoption in particular, its more about defending the longstanding principle that in American society and under the First Amendment, we should find ways to accommodate different religious groups and religious minorities and religious practices, said Nathan Diament, the Orthodox Unions Washington director.

Instead, an array of conservative religious groups see the Philadelphia case as a way into overturning a decision they have despised since it was made in 1990, Employment Division v. Smith, that upheld a drug rehabilitation clinics right to fire two Native American employees who smoked peyote as part of a religious ritual.

As everybody said back in the early 90s, this was the Dred Scott case of religious freedom and it continues to be, Rabbi Abba Cohen, Agudath Israels Washington director, referring to the notorious 19th-century decision that upheld slavery.

Smith, as it is commonly known, gave states wide some would say total latitude to reject religious exemptions to laws. The decision spurred the passage in 1993 of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, but the Supreme Court subsequently ruled the law held only for the federal government and was unconstitutional when other entities were accused of not granting exemptions for religious beliefs.

Rabhan of NCJW said the particulars of the Philadelphia case were germane to why Jewish groups should uphold the citys right to defund the adoption agency.

Placing children in foster homes and using religion as a way in which to accept or reject otherwise qualified placements, based on religious beliefs, is core to who we are as an organization, she said.

Judge Amy Coney Barrett speaks after being nominated to the Supreme Court by President Donald Trump in the Rose Garden of the White House, Sept. 26, 2020. (Oliver Douliery / AFP via Getty Images)

Cases about days off work for religious reasons could make the cut

Orthodox Jewish and other religiously conservative groups would like to see discarded a 1977 decision that upheld the right of the now defunct Trans World Airlines to fire a man whose Christian sect forbade work on Saturday.

There are an array of cases in the lower courts that they hope the court will seize upon to overturn TWA v. Hardison, a decision written so broadly that Cohen says he advises people not to file lawsuits challenging employers who will not allow time off for the Jewish Sabbath or holy days.

I tell people, your rights have been violated and you have a case but, you know, the law is so weak that to invest all that time and resources aggravation on a case that you dont have much of a chance to win, I just cant advise you with a clear conscience, he said.

Considered most likely to rise to the Supremes docket is Dalberiste V. GLE Associates, the case of a Seventh Day Adventist who sought sabbaths off from his power plant employer.

Growing attention to voting rights

Jewish civil liberties groups are pouring energy into voting access this year. They are also closely watching an Arizona voting rights case the court will consider this session in which the state has restricted what Trump and Republicans call ballot harvesting, collecting early ballots from voters.

Another voting rights case the court may take up is a law passed by Floridas Republican-led legislature and enacted by its Republican governor that guts a 2018 ballot measure that allowed most former felons to vote. The law requires the former felons to pay outstanding fines and court fees, and critics have argued it amounts to an unconstitutional poll tax.

Religious liberty issues could get a hearing

The court this week heard oral arguments in Tanzin v. Tanvir, the case of three Muslim men who would not act as federal informants in their own community. The federal government, they allege, retaliated by placing them on no-fly lists. They are suing for damages under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Orthodox Jewish groups are paying attention to the case to see whether the beleaguered law they once hoped would ensure their freedoms will take another beating.

Stern said to also watch out for challenges to state orders enforcing coronavirus pandemic restrictions on houses of worship. The court has before this session twice rejected appeals from churches against the restrictions, but Justice Brett Kavanaughs forceful dissent in a Nevada case suggests that the courts conservatives are itching to again take on the pandemic restrictions.

The potential for precedent-overturning cases is high

Perhaps the most prominent case that could be overturned if Barrett is confirmed is Roe. V. Wade, the 1973 decision that enshrined the right to abortion. Rabhan said there were at least 17 challenges to Roe v. Wade in lower courts that the Supreme Court could consider, and both she and the AJCs Stern said they were certain that abortion would come up this session, and in a way that could once and for all overturn Roe v. Wade.

Already, the court has indicated an interest in revisiting the issue of marriage equality, enshrined only in 2015 by Obergefell v. Hodges and another case that upheld the right to same-sex marriage.

The justices this week allowed to proceed a lawsuit two gay couples brought against Kim Davis, a Kentucky clerk who refused to grant them marriage licenses. Davis wanted the lawsuit quashed. However, two of the courts most conservative justices, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, suggested that the court could soon consider a more appropriate case that would overturn Obergefell v. Hodges.

This petition provides a stark reminder of the consequences of Oberfegell, Thomas wrote. By choosing to privilege a novel constitutional right over the religious liberty interests explicitly protected in the First Amendment, and by doing so undemocratically, the Court has created a problem that only it can fix.

Rabhan said she heard a warning in Thomass statement.

It was almost as if it was a dog whistle, to the Senate and certainly to Judge Barrett, that they too dont prioritize precedent, and its frightening to think about rights that we have being taken away and its as easy as filling one seat to make that happen, Rabhan said.

Read this article:
Everything 'potentially up for grabs': What Jewish groups are watching for in this unusual Supreme Court session - JTA News - Jewish Telegraphic...


Page 941«..1020..940941942943..950960..»

matomo tracker