Jewish American Heritage Month

Posted By simmons on July 19, 2017

The SPSC has faced repeated efforts by pro-Israel lobbyists and Scottish prosecutors to criminalize the groups pro-Palestine activities.

Activist from the Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign protest Israels violations of Palestinian rights outside the Glasgow Sheriff Court, Scotland on July 10, 2017. (Photo: Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign/Facebook)

In yet another landmark legal victory, members of the Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign emerged from court victorious today after being accused of racism. Their crime? Standing up to Zionism.

The trial ended three years of speculation and pressure for SPSC members whose robust defense of their actions won the day in Glasgow Sherriffs Court when the verdict was announced on Friday.

Five days of evidence and cross-examinations earlier this month focussed on the actions of two SPSC members who faced charges of racism and aggravated trespass for a protest against Israeli company Jericho cosmetics, which operates around the Dead Sea in the occupied West Bank. The protest was held in the wake of Israels 2014 military offensive against Palestinian civilians besieged in the Gaza Strip. More than 2,200 Palestinians were killed by the Israelis during the offensive, including 550 children, before in the war ended on 26 August. During the demonstration on 13 September 2014, the SPSC protesters denounced the killings.

The protest was held in the wake of Israels 2014 military offensive against Palestinian civilians besieged in the Gaza Strip. More than 2,200 Palestinians were killed by the Israelis during the offensive, including 550 children, before in the war ended on 26 August. During the demonstration on 13 September 2014, the SPSC protesters denounced the killings.

Police were called to the shopping center where the protest was being held, leading to the arrest of the two SPSC members accused of racism. In other words, explained Mick Napier, one of those arrested, we were accused of being motivated by hatred of Israelis rather than opposition to Israels repeated massacres, apartheid across the whole of Palestine and genocidal violence in Gaza.

During the Glasgow trial, the SPSC was buoyed by a High Court ruling in London that the Conservative government in Westminster acted unlawfully when it tried to prevent local councils in Britain from divesting from companies involved in Israels military occupation. The successful legal challenge for the right to boycott was brought by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign in London, supported by War on Want, the Campaign Against the Arms Trade and the Quakers.

However, Napier wasnt convinced that the result of the latest trial was a foregone conclusion. Given their past record, we felt it was unlikely that even this High Court ruling in favor of BDS [boycott, divestment and sanctions] would stop Scottish prosecutors related efforts to criminalize the campaign in support of Palestinian freedom.

The prosecutor called the Procurator Fiscal in the Scottish legal system claimed in open court that the two accused in the Glasgow case were recycling an ancient anti-Semitic Jewish blood libel by speaking about Israeli mass murder of Palestinians. The Procurator Fiscals office made these claims, said Napier, while the violated people of Gaza were still looking for ice-cream freezers and vegetable refrigerators in which to store the bodies of children killed by Israels military.

In their testimony, last month, Napier and his co-accused Jim Watson both rejected the claims made by prosecution witnesses, a Chief Inspector of Police, the manager of the Jericho stall and two local Zionist activists. The prosecution claim was that staff was intimidated by racist placards and the shouting of racist abuse; this was the description of the SPSCs criticism of the pro-Israel counter-demonstrators for supporting Israels most recent massacre of Palestinians.

The racist placard with which the Procurator Fiscal and Zionist witnesses took particular issue was a symbolic but graphic image of blood dripping under the name Dead Sea cosmetics. Napier pointed out that at the time of their protest, the UN Secretary-General was describing Israels massacre of thousands of Palestinians as a moral outrage and criminal act and a gross violation of humanitarian law.

When the Scottish government joined in by denouncing the deep inhumanity of the Israeli massacre, noted Napier, the Scottish procurators fiscal were working hand in glove with pro-Israel lobby groups to silence voices of Palestine solidarity.

The SPSC has faced repeated efforts by pro-Israel lobbyists and Scottish prosecutors to criminalize the groups pro-Palestine activities. The Zionist record to-date is one of almost total failure; legal action has failed to secure any convictions of pro-Palestine activists. There was, however, a consolation prize [for the Zionists] when we were both found guilty of refusing to leave the shopping center when asked to do so by the police, said Napier. I was also convicted of aggravated trespass for protesting inside the shopping center. We will be appealing against both convictions so any celebrations by the Zionists will, I suggest, be a bit premature.

In February last year, two employees of the pro-Israel Community Security Trust made allegations against SPSC members but that was also thrown out by Kilmarnock Sheriff Court when the Sheriff ruled that the crime as alleged had not taken place. Had we not had the benefit of anAl-Jazeera Arabic language broadcast of the protest where the CST tried to secure an assault conviction there might have been a different outcome, added Mick Napier.

Stories published in our Hot Topics section are chosen based on the interest of our readers. They are republished from a number of sources, and are not produced by MintPress News. The views expressed in these articles are the authors own and do not necessarily reflect Mint Press News editorial policy.

Excerpt from:
Scottish Court Rules Opposing Zionism Is Not Racism - Mintpress News (blog)

Category: Zionism
Tags: